I ran these apps to see what this device was capable of and I'm impressed. I know scores isn't everything but the device has a very good built quality. It runs very quick and smooth. I was not expecting this when I bought it for my younger brother. It doesn't feel like you are using a Mid-Range phone as it's categorized as.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Droid Incredible using XDA App
I have been saying this since before it was released. This phone has the same TI OMAP 3630 as the droid 2 and droid x just clocked at 800MHz instead of 1GHz. I think it's even the same screen as the droid 2.
I think it is the same screen. This phone is definitely going to be underestimated. If Motorola ever updates it to 2.2 it will be a contender against all current high end phones. Can some devs look into overclocking or making a recovery file for this phone.
I scored a 17.25 and 1443 on quadrant. Running Bravo at 1200/300 63sel ondemand. The phone will lockup if you run it at 1200 performance with no min and stock sel. FYI
photobuddha said:
I scored a 17.25 and 1443 on quadrant. Running Bravo at 1200/300 63sel ondemand. The phone will lockup if you run it at 1200 performance with no min and stock sel. FYI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you running 2.1 or 2.2? I've gotten 1609 with 1.5GHz on 2.2
2.2 What did you use to get the core to 1.5?
photobuddha said:
2.2 What did you use to get the core to 1.5?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woops...I have a feeling I made a typo... I think it was either 1.05GHz or 1.1GHz. But I don't really remember. I highly doubt it was 1.5GHz tho.
heydabop said:
Woops...I have a feeling I made a typo... I think it was either 1.05GHz or 1.1GHz. But I don't really remember. I highly doubt it was 1.5GHz tho.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have run at 1.05GHz stable so it was probably close to that area.
Managed to squeeze out 16.657 on Linpack @1200 MHz
I take that back, I got 19.679 MFLOPS with the newest version of Linpack.
1.2ghz @ 62 vsel.
HTC Wildfire
my HTC Wildfire with Cyanogenmod 9 - 2822 points in Linpack
Our phone is better than galaxy nexus lol
Sent from my MB520 using XDA App
Related
Is this good?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Bout average. Not to shabby. I'll take it. I have seen them all the way to 3000 but that's not the best measurement tool. The incredible is an extremely qwik phone.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
3k? Damn!
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
I've seen 3600 on an hd2. So here's what quadrants mean.
Absolutely nothing. I used to be able to get an 1800 pretty often I now only get 1100 to 1200 yet my phones 45799 times smoother now.
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
Here is my highest on Super Z roms.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
No. 3600 on the HD2 is fake. The HD2 has the same specs as the Nexus One and our phone. Impossible.
The Desire HD however, which the Thunderbolt is based on legitimately gets about 3100 on quadrant with its processor overclocked.
I think the hd2 gets them onlh if it's a windows one running android on nand it could be faked but I heard that explanation
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
Retested with latest cm7 gb rom and got 1300.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
If you run it multiple times in a row the fourth test is usually best
Sent from my Incredible using XDA App
Just got my personal best at 1539
Uber Z RC2.0.0 with included kernel and 1152 MHz overclock
1280 on Virtuous 3.2! Quadrant's cool I've been told Smartbench 2010 is better but disagree as I get HORRID scores in that app.
Did it a few more times highest at 1380! :O
my friend just got a mytouch4g and out of the box his score was in the 1700's. I always get in the 1300 or less range on SR3.5 with lou #8.
Inc SR 3.5, 40GB, 1800mah
www.TOOLBAND.com
PGleo86 said:
Just got my personal best at 1539
Uber Z RC2.0.0 with included kernel and 1152 MHz overclock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same setup just got 1761
Sent from my Uber Incredible
Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.
the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....
foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?
rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?
Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!
Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??
i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D
Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri
RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri
MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000
It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri
Like the Samsung galaxy s phone but on android 4.0.x roms?
No our phones can't handle that much overclock they wouldn't work
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
add119 said:
Like the Samsung galaxy s phone but on android 4.0.x roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
even though i posted this(my nexus s), our phones cant handle 1.7ghz too well. most would never be able to boot it. that said, our phones are faster at 1.32 or 1.44ghz than those phones are at 1.7ghz.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
simms22 said:
even though i posted this(my nexus s), our phones cant handle 1.7ghz too well. most would never be able to boot it. that said, our phones are faster at 1.32 or 1.44ghz than those phones are at 1.7ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that? I was always under the impression that the two phones are pretty much the same.
You without me is like Harold Melvin without the Blue Notes...
Its impossible for most phones to boot to 1.7 ghz. Most phones max out at 1.44 or 1.544 ghz. Even the Glitch kernel page for Galaxy S states that 1.7 ghz is extremely unstable and will fail for most phones.
Well on fascinate it was running well at 1.7 ghz even though 20 min later it crash on me
add119 said:
Well on fascinate it was running well at 1.7 ghz even though 20 min later it crash on me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if it crashes then its not working well,
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
What is the need of 1.7 in the first place
add119 said:
Like the Samsung galaxy s phone but on android 4.0.x roms?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone even works Perfect with 1Ghz, i dont understand why are we even talking about 1.7
The risk of hardware damage is very high, the phone would easily break down
Stock Kernel and Rom it looks, like the S4Pro is not far behind the 600? Just a little GPU enhancement - overclock and it would easily match the 22350 by the HTC One and not far behind Galaxy S4 either.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nice score mate
Sent from my X909 using Tapatalk 2
my untutu score
Sent from my X909 using Tapatalk 2[/QUOTE]
mcf1 said:
View attachment 1835033
my untutu score
Sent from my X909 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[/QUOTE]
1st post on XDA and highest bench thus far.. well played sir
That inst mine I just saw it while I was looking at buying the phone awhile ago, I saw them as high as 22500 I think on AndroiAuthority or on a similar website. I get my Find 5 today and whatever, I'm going to push it to the limits every once in awhile, gaming benching etc. I want to do the same as I have my DNA. Mu CPU up to 1892 at 4 cores and 100 or 125 overclock GPU. I'm getting HTC One and close to the S4 Octa scores with it overclocked. These s4Pro's will go and they overclock well. On the CPU side I really don't see any reason to get much higher, I think most quad core phones now will run pretty much all the Apps that are out, But I would like to get the GPU up to where the Snapdragon 600 is running, I think the S4Pro is at 300 MHz and the 600 is clocked at 400MHz. So it shouldn't be to hard, they did it on the DNA pretty quick. Cant wait until DHL gets here, watch it will be like 6 0r 7pm. Oh well. I will just get all my Apps ready.
So do you guys have any tips before I start playing around with my OF5?
Please! No dead pixels or hardware faults
I'm getting just under 21k (20997) on stock ROM. I've seen Oppo Find 5's with 27k, so with the right tweaks this thing is a beast and just under the S4.
I got 22k with firefly and i think this is just awesome
Sent from my X909 using xda app-developers app
19633 with pac rom
Sent from my X909 using xda app-developers app
Never got over 20050 in Antutu, no matter what ROM I tried, midnight 32GB version.
My max antutu on stock (non-clean phone): 20702
Sent from my X909 using xda premium
try cm10
KaminoReal said:
Never got over 20050 in Antutu, no matter what ROM I tried, midnight 32GB version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try a cm10 or based cm10 rom.
State your rom, current kernel, frequencies, and voltages
Kernel elementalx
Cpu 2052
Gpu 450
Rom arhd 9.4
Volts 1227
Quadrant
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Antutu
If you would luke to.flash this beautiful kernel it can be had here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2249774
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
What's your bin number?
Average CPU Temperature?
Governor?
Govenor ondemand
Average temp around ,44c with normal use
Pvs 3
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
Thanks! Great score then! That score is almost the same as the exynos octa core of S4. Although the antutu benchmark got lower score compared to quadrant. Which test did you perform first?
Riyal said:
Thanks! Great score then! That score is almost the same as the exynos octa core of S4. Although the antutu benchmark got lower score compared to quadrant. Which test did you perform first?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The quadrant score is definitely higher than my S4 octa (13K) but lower than my antutu (32K). No overclocking, just using stock kernel. That being said, with 4.2.2 on my One, there is definite overall improvement especially in terms of GPU performance.
I think the octa score is due to the powervr its just way more optimized then the adreno.
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
KindaJackedForANerd said:
I think the octa score is due to the powervr its just way more optimized then the adreno.
Sent from my HTC One using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohhh.. I thought it was a Mali GPU? If you're correct then yeah! PowerVR can already be considered a veteran when it comes to mobile GPU. It was the first ever mobile GPU in a phone. It was used in the phones nokia n95 & n82 in the year 2007-2008