i have heard that qualcomm has the drivers or something to that effect, and wont release the info for programmers to take advantage of the graphics accelerator. the effect is i cant play simple videos, unless i run them through a program first to recode them
if that is the case, why would sony ericsson give them the contract, knowing this?
When do you think this problem may be cracked?
Why wouldnt sony ericsson include codecs in their media panel ( i understand this has video acceleration)
Although QTv is still not very well understood, CorePlayer can (and does) use it to accelerate video playback.
Leddy said:
Although QTv is still not very well understood, CorePlayer can (and does) use it to accelerate video playback.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i thought it didnt yet??
I don't know how they do it.. but coreplayer is 99.9% smooth !
only the really fast scenes in normal xvid sometimes drop a frame... but it's very acceptable.
as the others said keep an eye on the core player 2.0 release which is said to do better hardware decoding. its not bad now though .
dont know much about the details of qc driver mess as i am new here. but even if you have full proper access to the driver, applications needs to written to take advantage of the accelerated hardware to notice a performance increase.
Thanks for information
THE GRIZZ said:
as the others said keep an eye on the core player 2.0 release which is said to do better hardware decoding. its not bad now though .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is bad, real bad. My 3 years old Palm T5 plays movies 20% faster, at 100% (ie the same resolution). But then no WM device of X1 generation is any better. Faster devices only starts to appear (like new ASUS and Toshiba promised 1GHz device).
Dr.Sid said:
It is bad, real bad. My 3 years old Palm T5 plays movies 20% faster, at 100% (ie the same resolution). But then no WM device of X1 generation is any better. Faster devices only starts to appear (like new ASUS and Toshiba promised 1GHz device).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the T5 doesn't have to display all the extra pixels.
I say with no scaling .. so extra pixels should not count. I mean when the picture is small enough to fit on both displays at 100%.
When playing at fullscreen, Xperia is even slower, while not much ..
With null video the speed is more or less same. But even copying the image with no scaling seems to be slow on Xperia. On Palm 100% scale is only a bit slower then null video.
On the other hand Palm is slow at scaling. For Xperia (crystal player, qTV driver) scaling makes only little difference.
I only watch language lessons on Xperia, and only rarely. I don't need that to be perfectly fluent. And then, you can always convert the video, which should help.
I guess the reason is Palm T5 was really good at that time. The difference is it was just PDA. No wifi, no phone, no gps. It could have strong CPU. Communicators have to feed and cool all that, and they started with weaker CPUs (even communicators from Palm, or even models with WIFI (Tx) had slower CPU). Only last year communicators catch up with CPU power. But then there are many other things, like buss speed, display driver, OS support (Palm is quite simple OS).
The ultimate pocket movie player is just not here yet. T5 was a bit closer to it then Xperia (it also has bigger screen, worse colors on the other hand).
Anyone knows how is TouchHD in this aspect ?
read this
http://mobile-enthusiast.blogspot.com/2009/02/saga-of-htcs-video-performance.html
Good find ! That explains a lot. Only if I knew it earlier
Will there be issues on video playback like all other HTC devices ?
Will leo be able to play a not converted divx ?
firiel said:
Will there be issues on video playback like all other HTC devices ?
Will leo be able to play a not converted divx ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's able to play till 480p res. videos even no exist video acceleration or drivers... It's powered by brute cpu force with snapdragon to process vid. codecs IMO...
firiel said:
Will there be issues on video playback like all other HTC devices ?
Will leo be able to play a not converted divx ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not gonna worry about that. For Touch HD, I used Total Video Converter, I used Iphone H264 MP4 best settings and play in Windows Media Player, even in Touch HD it is smooth and stunning at full 800 X 480, only that scrolling through time frames or during video startup is sluggish. And for HD2, I believe the loading time will be shortened.
Playing high quality videos have been non issue with these HTC devices, you just need to do it right.
precsmo said:
Playing high quality videos have been non issue with these HTC devices, you just need to do it right.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you don't mind wasting time on conversion, that is.
From HTC website: Video supported formats: .wmv, .asf, .mp4, .3gp, .3g2, .m4v, .avi
Can't speak to quality because the phone isn't out. ;-)
Reason4444 said:
I think it's able to play till 480p res. videos even no exist video acceleration or drivers... It's powered by brute cpu force with snapdragon to process vid. codecs IMO...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which means that when a device from another manufacturer like samsung or acer grabs the snapdragon we will cry with the results, right ?
And dont have me even mention tegra
rebecker said:
From HTC website: Video supported formats: .wmv, .asf, .mp4, .3gp, .3g2, .m4v, .avi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touch Diamond2 specs also mention .avi, but it's a half-truth. I use a Topaz ROM on my Touch HD and can't view regular DivX/XVid videos with anything built-in. Maybe the FullScreen Player from HTC Album (or Windows Media Player) here can play .avis with some weird codecs, but it's absolutely irrelevant to real-life scenarios.
vangrieg said:
Touch Diamond2 specs also mention .avi, but it's a half-truth. I use a Topaz ROM on my Touch HD and can't view regular DivX/XVid videos with anything built-in. Maybe the FullScreen Player from HTC Album (or Windows Media Player) here can play .avis with some weird codecs, but it's absolutely irrelevant to real-life scenarios.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've gone back to the stock rom on my hd, after an unfortunate incident with some muggers. But Coreplayer (ver 1.3.2) seems very adept at handling any native divx/xvid files
AshHD said:
I've gone back to the stock rom on my hd, after an unfortunate incident with some muggers. But Coreplayer (ver 1.3.2) seems very adept at handling any native divx/xvid files
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then we probably have very different HDs because mine reminds me of the era of 200MHz HTC devices. Playback of unconverted is jerky with visibly very low FPS, dynamic scenes are more like slideshows than films, even with 700MB rips, 1.4GB ones are even worse. This is not to mention that CorePlayer doesn't support AC3 audio which means that half of the movies I have are mute. If this is called being "very adept at handling" then I don't know what isn't.
Stock ROMs are exactly the same in terms of video performance, the reason why I mentioned Topaz ROM is simply because that device boasts .avi support, which it is in fact lacking. That said, ".avi support" is pretty much a meaningless phrase since .avi is just a wrapper, there could be a full zoo of codecs inside.
firiel said:
Which means that when a device from another manufacturer like samsung or acer grabs the snapdragon we will cry with the results, right ?
And dont have me even mention tegra
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In what way do you imagine that these devices will be superior to the HD2 when it comes to video playback? If the HD2 can play back video at full screen resolution (800x480) with no dropped frames at all and support any wrapper or codec you might want, how much better can any other device really get? That (most likely) is what the HD2 running Coreplayer will deliver.
The only time there's likely to be an issue is if you expect to play back a high-definition (e.g. 1280x720) video downscaled to the screen resolution in real time. But, even if it's only for reasons of storage space, you'd probably want to downscale any clips like that to 800x480 resolution anyway.
It's possible that other devices (the ones that can use GPU acceleration when playing xvid and divx stuff) will offer better battery-life during video playback, I guess, but I doubt it'll be that big a margin.
Shasarak, it's not clear how the downscaling will work performance-wise without GPU support, and CorePlayer doesn't support AC3 sound. Not that I need to listen to AC3 on a phone, but I certainly have movies with it. So at this moment CorePlayer is definitely a mediocre solution as far as I'm concerned.
Shasharak,
Am not arguing that the device hopefully might be able to play, by CPU power 480p, but what about HTC not delivering for once again, what our money worth.
If u search for comparisons of omnia and any htc 528 based model, you will see great differences on video playback. This is unacceptable from me.
And what about gaming or 3d accelerated apps. We are getting to a new age of handheld devices, that should be (MUST BE) able to deliver video, web, audio and entertainment. And should do it with all their power.
vangrieg said:
Shasarak, it's not clear how the downscaling will work performance-wise without GPU support, and CorePlayer doesn't support AC3 sound. Not that I need to listen to AC3 on a phone, but I certainly have movies with it. So at this moment CorePlayer is definitely a mediocre solution as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, as I say, I don't imagine anyone will want to downscale video on it anyway - HD video won't look any worse if it's downscaled off-line, and it will take up far less space on the memory card than the original HD file.
Coreplayer not supporting AC3 is a problem, I'll grant you. It's possible that Coreplayer version 2 will support it. If not, then you'll have to see if you can get TCPMP running on the Leo - I expect there will be a version that does.
firiel said:
Shasharak,
Am not arguing that the device hopefully might be able to play, by CPU power 480p, but what about HTC not delivering for once again, what our money worth.
If u search for comparisons of omnia and any htc 528 based model, you will see great differences on video playback. This is unacceptable from me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but that's the point: you won't see those differences on the HD2. I own a Touch Pro2, so I understand how annoyed you are. But the difference with the HD2 is that the CPU is so powerful that it should be able to play back anything with a resolution of 800x480 or less without dropping any frames using the CPU alone - why would you care if it's using the CPU or the GPU if you can't see any difference in the playback? The Snapdragon CPU is nearly three times as powerful as the one in the TP2. Even without GPU acceleration it'll still work just fine.
firiel said:
And what about gaming or 3d accelerated apps. We are getting to a new age of handheld devices, that should be (MUST BE) able to deliver video, web, audio and entertainment. And should do it with all their power.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, we know from existing benchmarks that the Leo will deliver hardware-accelerated OpenGL ES, so that's a good start. On some 3D benchmarks it's more than 20 times as fast as a TP2. (I doubt there will be any 3D-accelerated apps for Windows Mobile, anyway - otherwise people who own cheaper, slower WinMo phones will buy them and then complain they can't run them. WinMo apps tend to be written for low-end hardware.) Web should be fine - especially once we have a version of FlashPlayer 10.1 which will be in beta before the end of the year. I wouldn't worry.
Shasarak said:
Well, as I say, I don't imagine anyone will want to downscale video on it anyway - HD video won't look any worse if it's downscaled off-line, and it will take up far less space on the memory card than the original HD file.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I, on the other hand, can't imagine why anyone would want to convert any videos to watch on the phone. I have a notebook with a 60GB SSD and some 1.16GHz processor - it's blazing fast for Office/internet use but it'll take forever to convert any videos. I also store files like videos on a network drive, so using the more powerful desktop is still slow. And I need to watch videos only occasionally - when going on a trip I can copy a movie or two to take with me on a plane. So space isn't a problem really while ability to watch unconverted video is.
In any case, there was a question you asked about how another device may be more powerful in video playback - I guess with proper driver support they can be, and there are use cases when this is important.
vangrieg said:
I, on the other hand, can't imagine why anyone would want to convert any videos to watch on the phone. I have a notebook with a 60GB SSD and some 1.16GHz processor - it's blazing fast for Office/internet use but it'll take forever to convert any videos. I also store files like videos on a network drive, so using the more powerful desktop is still slow. And I need to watch videos only occasionally - when going on a trip I can copy a movie or two to take with me on a plane. So space isn't a problem really while ability to watch unconverted video is.
In any case, there was a question you asked about how another device may be more powerful in video playback - I guess with proper driver support they can be, and there are use cases when this is important.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a TP2 owner with a slow desktop PC I feel your pain, I really do. I'm simply pointing out that the HD2 won't suffer from this problem to anywhere near the extent that current-generation HTC phones do. My best guess is that no video clip that runs at 800x480 or lower will require conversion; it's only ones in higher resolutions that will. And the chances are that even your netbook wouldn't be able to play a 720p video smoothly, so what use is it to store the videos in hi-def format in the first place? You might as well download a lower-res version.
If you end having to convert something very occasionally then just leave it running on your desktop PC overnight - it's not that big a deal.
The key difference, here, is that a TP2 can't even get close to playing a 624x351 xvid clip without conversion, while the HD2 will play it perfectly. It'll play anything other than high definition clips perfectly without conversion - so there is exactly one use-case where GPU acceleration is relevant, and it's not an important one.
Shasarak said:
I'm simply pointing out that the HD2 won't suffer from this problem to anywhere near the extent that current-generation HTC phones do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is most certainly true. I still bought HD even though I knew about these problems, but it's still an annoyance. HD2 will be better for sure.
Shasarak said:
And the chances are that even your netbook wouldn't be able to play a 720p video smoothly,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not a netbook, it's a "real" notebook, Thinkpad X300, but anyway - I don't watch movies on my computers - I use a network media server and a network player, they are streamed to my TV. So my phone is the only computer-like device that needs to be able to play videos, actually.
Shasarak said:
so what use is it to store the videos in hi-def format in the first place? You might as well download a lower-res version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In fact, I try to avoid downloading HD videos whenever I can as I don't care for viewing them in high resolutions even though I have a large Full HD TV. The problem is only that low-res versions aren't always available, and increasingly so. It's not my preference but rather an unfortunate trend.
So you think that the snapdragon "RAW" is enough. Enough for what ? There are no limits for what to expect.
Should HTC, continue to ignore what GPU means, we should not. once again accept it It was like 2 years ago when I complained about my TC performance, without getting any answer. And now Samsung, on their first winmo device (omnia), has really better results, using the same processor. There will be tons of snapdragon devices, or even tegra powered (hopefully) soon enough.
If Qualcomm refuses to give the guys who write CorePlayer access to their intellectual property, that isn't altogether HTC's fault. Any software actually written by HTC does use GPU acceleration - there's a limit to the extent that they can be held responsible for the deficiencies of third party software.
firiel said:
So you think that the snapdragon "RAW" is enough. Enough for what ? There are no limits for what to expect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I set down very precise limits in my prediction: CPU-only video decoding will (IMO) be adequate for all videos with a resolution of 800x480 or lower. Any video with higher resolution may require transcoding - but it obviously couldn't look any better than an 800x480 video if it's being played back on an 800x480 screen.
firiel said:
Should HTC, continue to ignore what GPU means, we should not. once again accept it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And how exactly should we "not accept it"? I am also pissed off at HTC, but I don't think we can do anything except buying something else, but there are also reasons not to (all of them very individual).
Shasarak said:
If Qualcomm refuses to give the guys who write CorePlayer access to their intellectual property, that isn't altogether HTC's fault.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, with a BUT: they (HTC) could enable their software to play real-life video formats. Samsung's Touch Player does that. And a smaller "but": they could also provide generic driver that would provide DirectX/OpenGL interfaces for Qualcomm's quirky technologies. Both options would cost them money I guess, so they chose not to.
The HD2's hardware (camera sensor, Snapdragon chipset, etc.) are capable of HD video recording, and other phones with almost the same hardware have it enabled (the HTC EVO 4G, for example).
Phones with lower-specced processing components, like the Samsung i8910 (ARM Cortex A8 at 600 MHz, PowerVR SGX530, Symbian), support HD recording as well. Even the ARM11-powered Samsung Omnia II on WM offers better video capture (even if not HD) than the HD2.
HTC says the HD2 can only record at up to VGA resolution due to a Windows Mobile limitation. Does anyone know specifically what the problem is?
I would love to hear the answer to this also, subscribing.
For what it's worth, I got another useless reply back from HTC after a few weeks (as expected):
It is a feature that was not requested by the carrier when the device was produced. We have no information on why this feature was not enabled on the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd be curious to see if 720p recording can be enabled when Android is fully ported over to the HD2. The hardware seems capable and the EVO 4G supports it with nearly identical components (it does have the 8MP camera that the HD2 was originally slated to get, but even the HD2's 5MP sensor should be able to capture 720p I believe).
Hi,
probably most of you know a long discussion in many threads about issues with video playback that Xoom/Honeycomb/Tegra 2 has.
Some of you say it is in the hardware some of you say it is just a software... so far none of the comapnies involved had confirmed anything either way.
But... I found this news.... what do you think?
http://androidcommunity.com/ainol-h...ps-display-huge-1080p-codec-support-20110321/
Ainol may be better known for their Full HD capable PMPs, but the company is turning to Android 3.0 Honeycomb and a proper tablet. According to some teaser spec pages, the so-far unnamed slate will have a 1280 x 800 IPS capacitive touchscreen display and run a SoChip Cortex-A9 processor.
They’re impressive specs, given tablets with IPS displays – such as the iPad 2 – are in relatively short supply. 1080p HD support is promised, with a fair amount of codec compatibility as well: MKV, AVI, WMV, H.264, XviD and MPEG.
Considering one the continued shortcomings of Android is its patchy media support out of the box, that could be enough to earn the Ainol slate a niche of its own. Pricing, screen size, release dates and other specs are still unknown at this stage.
They can say whatever, but bring it on
Really?
You mean OLD codecs/containers?
AVI now is typical just DivX which is really just another H.264 (which is already supported) As DivX runs nativity on my Droid X so I am sure it is a licensing issue on the Xoom.
Xvid, is just another DivX without the licensing issues
MPEG 1 and 2 Seriously you are excited about that?
WMV another old container we really should be moving away from as it is the MS version of MPEG-4 part 2. Now if the devices supported VC-1 MS containers that would be a bit exciting.
Now granted not having to convert everything would be nice but if people would just rip H.264/AVC in the first place life would just be easier IMO. I would be more exited about seeing more/better WebM encoders out there (which your Xoom also supports nativity)
Why won't any other company use IPS displays. If some company that I've never heard of (that I'm assuming just isn't popular here) can, then why cant Samsung or Motorola?
Eclair~ said:
Why won't any other company use IPS displays. If some company that I've never heard of (that I'm assuming just isn't popular here) can, then why cant Samsung or Motorola?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here is a well known maker coming out with an IPS display and more:
http://tablets-planet.com/2011/03/2...er-android-3-0-tablet-first-launch-in-3-days/
the issue with the tegra 2 as i know it is with playing high profile H.264, ive confirmed this with the notion ink Adam (i had for about a week)
i preordered the xoom and ill test when i get it but from what ive read its the same issue.
Eclair~ said:
Why won't any other company use IPS displays. If some company that I've never heard of (that I'm assuming just isn't popular here) can, then why cant Samsung or Motorola?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even worse, you have "cheap" tablets like the Nook Color rolling out with IPS goodness. With devices like these, where there isn't one normal way to view the screen, high quality panels like IPS should be the norm. It really is crappy that companies are still cheaping out on some of the most important parts (viewsonic G-Tab, and Archos....)