Related
HTC just announced the Desire Z version of their "Vision" handset that is identical to the G2. It runs a newer version of HTC Sense that's got a lot of nice new enhancements. I expect G2 owners will want to port this in a hurry.
Desire Z will be available in October in Europe and Asia only.
Check out this "Fast Boot" --- boots in like 4 seconds::: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OpWPMens9C8
YouTube video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERH9BoU64pw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXnCOhvoqgw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FAIlKN2u5M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwiNDsZNRag
Specifications (from here):
800 MHz Qualcomm Scorpion
Qualcomm MSM7230
2x faster than Snapdragon CPU
5x better than Snapdragon GPU
Android 2.2 w/ HTC Sense
3.7 inch display
800 x 480 resolution
SLCD technology
5 megapixel camera
LED flash
720p HD recording
HSPA+ integration
WiFi b/g/n
Size: 4.7 x 2.4 x 0.6 inches
Weight: 6.5 ounces
Battery: 1300 mAh Lion
Talk time: up to 6.5 hours
Standby time: up to 17.5 days
Pop-out QWERTY keyboard
Four rows
Programmable “quick access” keys
4GB of internal memory
Full aluminum body
HTC Fast Boot
Pre-installed 8GB microSD card
GPS with A-GPS
DLNA Streaming and Media Sharing
3.5 mm stereo audio jack
micro-USB (5-pin micro-USB 2.0)
Audio supported formats – Playback: .aac, .amr, .ogg, .m4a, .mid, .mp3, .wav, .wma (Windows Media Audio 9)
Video supported formats – Playback: .3gp, .3g2, .mp4, .wmv (Windows Media Video 9)
Ambient light sensor
Proximity sensor
Digital compass
That fast boot is crazy. I'm loving the phone, definitely fast. However the phone looks VERY thick.
so its called "HTC fast boot". I wonder if that means the G2 won't have it. I'd be a lot more likely to turn my phone off and save battery if I knew I could turn it back on that quick
The Desire Z has 1.5GB of internal memory from what I've read at Engadget, not 4.
Infact, your source also says 1.5GB internal memory.
Where are they getting that the CPU is 2x faster than Snapdragon? For all we know it's the same CPU shrunk to 45nm, so it should be the same speed.
Its possible HTC said that at the event? I'm just speculating.. I would be happy if its 2x faster.. lol.
dualityim said:
Where are they getting that the CPU is 2x faster than Snapdragon? For all we know it's the same CPU shrunk to 45nm, so it should be the same speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a lot of the performance gain is from the Adreno 205 GPU as opposed to the older Adreno 200 GPUs on the Desire, HD2 and Evo. The Desire HD, however, also has the Adreno 205.
Superfrag said:
Its possible HTC said that at the event? I'm just speculating.. I would be happy if its 2x faster.. lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really sure if that equates to better performance, but it is more efficient.
If you think about it, past 1st gen snapdragon phones had very poor GPUs which made the CPU look slower. Maybe the upgraded GPU adds speed to an otherwise speedy CPU.
That could be true. Maybe the GPU in earlier Snapdragons was bottlenecking the CPU. Makes sense.. I also think these can be OC'ed more without issues due to the 45nm architecture.
but will the 1300mah battery life survive?
I think it should be better. The shrinkage in die size results in a more efficient CPU, which emits less heat and consumes less power. If it was 1500mAh it would have been super, but I think 1300 mAh will be pretty good.
Maybe, just maybe HTC might release 1500 batteries, which will be sold separately. Or we might have to turn to aftermarket battery makers to satisfy our needs! (obviously not the extended version, same size but higher mAh)
Superfrag said:
That could be true. Maybe the GPU in earlier Snapdragons was bottlenecking the CPU. Makes sense.. I also think these can be OC'ed more without issues due to the 45nm architecture.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've heard that the MSM7x30 is actually the new 1Ghz Snapdragon underclocked at 800Mhz. Apparently that info is on the qualcomm website somewhere. If true then hell yeah the CPU can be overclocked, at the expense of battery power though.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
The video on youtube titled "htc desire z - a closer look" is pretty amazing (i can't post links as i'm too new to this site). i'm just wondering how much is sense and how much will be on the g2...
skulk3r said:
a lot of the performance gain is from the Adreno 205 GPU as opposed to the older Adreno 200 GPUs on the Desire, HD2 and Evo. The Desire HD, however, also has the Adreno 205.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Notice that those specs specifically mention that the CPU is 2x faster and the GPU is 5x faster, so when they say the CPU is 2x faster, they are not talking about the performance boost gained from using the Adreno 205, they are specifically referring to a faster CPU core. That's what I'm wondering about, the GPU is faster for sure, but all evidence points to a CPU that performs the same (or worse, due to the 200MHz slower clock) but shrunk to 45nm for better power efficiency.
You guys think the g2 will get dlna functions?
We don't know. AFAIK, the Desire Z doesn't have DLNA, nor does the Desire HD. All we can do is wait for it to be released, or reviews of it to come out.
sheek360 said:
You guys think the g2 will get dlna functions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Superfrag said:
We don't know. AFAIK, the Desire Z doesn't have DLNA, nor does the Desire HD. All we can do is wait for it to be released, or reviews of it to come out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Desire Z seems to have DLNA, according to HTC. It's around 4 mins into the promo video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly4C0TXmnlQ
ppl... clock speed is like horsepwoer in a car. its not the only determinant of performance. other stuff matters in a car right? like aerodynamics, weight, transmission etc? same for a chip. engineering matters. 2nd gen snapdragons are 2nd gen for a reason... they're better
Sent from my HTC Dream using XDA App
sheek360 said:
You guys think the g2 will get dlna functions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably not. I don't see t-mobile digging into their pockets for that.
j.books said:
ppl... clock speed is like horsepwoer in a car. its not the only determinant of performance. other stuff matters in a car right? like aerodynamics, weight, transmission etc? same for a chip. engineering matters. 2nd gen snapdragons are 2nd gen for a reason... they're better
Sent from my HTC Dream using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't understand, Snapdragon is not a chip, it's a chipset or SoC. The CPU in Snapdragon is called Scorpion, and the G2 supposedly uses the same CPU, except manufactured in a 45nm process rather than a 65nm process. So except for the clock speed, we shouldn't expect any changes in the performance of the CPU.
Hi
Can any one tell me which device is faster
HTC Desire Z or HTC Desire HD
and if want one of them which one you will take
an9093 said:
Hi
Can any one tell me which device is faster
HTC Desire Z or HTC Desire HD
and if want one of them which one you will take
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this seems a strange question
Desire Z = 800mhz with 512mb RAM
Desire HD = 1000mhz and 768mb Ram
So the HD is clearly faster.
Writing a Facebook status or anything else is faster on the HD because you don't have to pull out the keyboard
Because of the hardware specs I think the HD has more power and is faster, but we have to wait for the first reviews... ?!
Same CPU and GPU but Desire HD's is clocked higher so that wins that.
Bigger screen = easier menu acses = quicker
MacaronyMax said:
Same CPU and GPU but Desire HD's is clocked higher so that wins that.
Bigger screen = easier menu acses = quicker
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always thought that if the device has same cpu n gpu the the one with he smaller screen will be faster as same gpu has less real estate to render...
arnozzle said:
I always thought that if the device has same cpu n gpu the the one with he smaller screen will be faster as same gpu has less real estate to render...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Except in this case these two devices have different CPUs
chief1978 said:
this seems a strange question
Desire Z = 800mhz with 512mb RAM
Desire HD = 1000mhz and 768mb Ram
So the HD is clearly faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
arnozzle said:
I always thought that if the device has same cpu n gpu the the one with he smaller screen will be faster as same gpu has less real estate to render...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quite apart from the higher clock speed mentioned I'm not sure this is true, it's not like it has to render more pixels, same resolution = same real estate, just blown up a bit. Maybe I'm wrong.
The diference is if the resolution would be smaller... for example.
HTC Wildfire 1 GHz with 240x320 4.3" (i know it has 600MHz, but if we put the sam CPU and the 3.2" size)
HTC Desire HD 1 GHz with 480x800 4.3"
Wildfire would have at least 30% better performance... Its all in pixels not dimension of the LCD
TNStrangelove said:
Quite apart from the higher clock speed mentioned I'm not sure this is true, it's not like it has to render more pixels, same resolution = same real estate, just blown up a bit. Maybe I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're correct.
Seriously????
Are you really all answering this not so intelligent question? REALLY???
For the guy, who is asking this:
Use google!!!
Do research!!!
Search the forum!!!
Find CPU model numbers, about nm's and gpu's - START TO LEARN.
This is a WAY to dumb question (pardon me) to be asked in a new thread. If you are asking such questions, I really advice you to NOT get this phone, cuz it's gonna get SO MUCH MORE DIFFICULT than you would ever expect, judging from simplicity of your question.
Stop living under a rock.
Sorry for my behavior, it's just that I get a little enraged from time to time. It's just a matter of time, that someone asks something so basic as: Which is brighter - dual LED flash or single LED flash, and which one would you get?
Isn't the Desire Z fitted with a newer CPU than the Desire HD? If so, it could be more powerful even if the clock speed is lower, especially since I just looked up the Desire Z's CPU and it says it's recommended top clock speed is 1GHz - I give it a few weeks after release at the most until the speed's upgraded with a custom kernel.
There are both 2nd generation 45nm processors with the same Adreno 205 GPU...only the Desire HD is clocked more on 1GHz and Z is at 800MHz
MaybachMan said:
Isn't the Desire Z fitted with a newer CPU than the Desire HD? If so, it could be more powerful even if the clock speed is lower, especially since I just looked up the Desire Z's CPU and it says it's recommended top clock speed is 1GHz - I give it a few weeks after release at the most until the speed's upgraded with a custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, given both phones are being released at the same time, they both have the same model of CPU. Really man. Why would HTC give the Desire HD a worse processor than the Desire Z...
Smartmob said:
There are both 2nd generation 45nm processors with the same Adreno 205 GPU...only the Desire HD is clocked more on 1GHz and Z is at 800MHz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does that mean we can over clock the Z to 1ghz?
What about RAM that would make a difference too.
questions questions...more is better...thats it. Numbers are numbers...
You can probably push him to some limit, but then you can push DHD even more then Z...
MaybachMan said:
Isn't the Desire Z fitted with a newer CPU than the Desire HD? If so, it could be more powerful even if the clock speed is lower, especially since I just looked up the Desire Z's CPU and it says it's recommended top clock speed is 1GHz - I give it a few weeks after release at the most until the speed's upgraded with a custom kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, both CPUs are next gen snapdragons. In fact I believe they are the exact same chip model, the desire Z is just under-clocked . It should be very easy to over-clock but that would just make them equal.
Yeah, thought it made more sense to give them the both CPU TBH, I'd just read otherwise on other threads.
Smartmob said:
questions questions...more is better...thats it. Numbers are numbers...
You can probably push him to some limit, but then you can push DHD even more then Z...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not necessarily if the Z is using the same CPU under-clocked, then theoretically you should be able to over-clock them to the same amount.
Opel Astra 1.9 CDTI 100KS and Astra 1.9 CDTI 150KS... Are they the same only chiped? No, there are some minor diferences in the engine too...
For those of you that haven't seen yet... someone has overclocked a G2 to 1.4ghz.
does anybody know how to optimize the performance of our gpu, the adreno 200 by qualcomm? some said this gpu is strong enough for mobile gaming. theres has to be some kind of tweak for it maybe?
just curios
The Wildfire most certainly does not have an Adreno 200 GPU. It is actually the Desire and the Wildfire S which does.
I am assuming you are getting this info from GSMArena. They have mixed up the GPU Specs of the Wildfire and the Wildfire S.
Hi every1.
Was just reading this article :
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=257
It is QUITE interesting to see that the Flyer scores so much higher in GPU compared to the Desire HD...
Could it be there are improved GPU drivers? Could this be the reason HTC Sense 3.0 is coming to the Flyer but NOT the Desire HD?
If this is the case, maybe some developers could get something valuable out of a possible Rom dump?
Any Ideas?
It might not be using the same GPU, that's just speculation according to that site
Due to the much higher res, it would also need a much better GPU to get higher scores, I doubt it's using the 205 looking at those results and that res
Joey93 said:
It might not be using the same GPU, that's just speculation according to that site
Due to the much higher res, it would also need a much better GPU to get higher scores, I doubt it's using the 205 looking at those results and that res
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but Qualcomm (as far as we know) doesn't have any single cores with the 220.
Which is why I assume it has to be the 205. Or else Qualcomm made an exclusive for HTC?
In that case maybe HTC does have a point saying that parts of Sense 3.0 wont make it onto the Desire HD line because of hardware limitations...
Hm...
From what I've read over the net, the Flyer is running a dual-core clocked at 1.5Ghz? Which leads me to believe it'll be an Adreno 220.
I would be very disappointed the Flyer won't ship with a dual core chip given the competition. At minimum I'd expect the same specs as the recently announced HTC Sensation.
kinnyfaifai said:
From what I've read over the net, the Flyer is running a dual-core clocked at 1.5Ghz? Which leads me to believe it'll be an Adreno 220.
I would be very disappointed the Flyer won't ship with a dual core chip given the competition. At minimum I'd expect the same specs as the recently announced HTC Sensation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's single core http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/15/htc-launches-into-tablet-wars-with-1-5ghz-7-inch-flyer/
Hawks556 said:
It's single core http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/15/htc-launches-into-tablet-wars-with-1-5ghz-7-inch-flyer/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But it could be dual-core with locked secound core... And Ardeno 220. I don't belive they have just build bigger desire HD, OC'ed CPU and thats it.
krogoth said:
But it could be dual-core with locked secound core... And Ardeno 220. I don't belive they have just build bigger desire HD, OC'ed CPU and thats it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It could also be quad-core with three cores locked, but I doubt it I think they would have advertised it as dual-core if it really was that.
Like someone else mentioned, the Flyer is using a single core for sure and most likely the same GPU as the Desire HD.
I would speculate that the score is so much higher because the Flyer is running Gingerbread. Gingerbread was said to improve graphics performance with better driver support, and maybe HTC decided to optimize their Adreno drivers too which probably explains the jump in performance.
To be honest this actually makes me a little more excited for the Gingerbread update coming anytime now because we'll probably get the same improvements
SupremeBeaver said:
Like someone else mentioned, the Flyer is using a single core for sure and most likely the same GPU as the Desire HD.
I would speculate that the score is so much higher because the Flyer is running Gingerbread. Gingerbread was said to improve graphics performance with better driver support, and maybe HTC decided to optimize their Adreno drivers too which probably explains the jump in performance.
To be honest this actually makes me a little more excited for the Gingerbread update coming anytime now because we'll probably get the same improvements
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm... knowing HTC, they probably wont bring any graphical improvements. We will probably have to get some dev to get what ever HTC did to improve the drivers.
Hawks556 said:
It's single core http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/15/htc-launches-into-tablet-wars-with-1-5ghz-7-inch-flyer/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I stand corrected! I just had a peep on pdadb.net and it's reporting a single core 1.5Ghz chip with Adreno 205 GPU in it. Obviously take that with a pinch of salt, anything can happen from now till release day.
If it is running an Adreno 205, then lets hope they have developed an optimized driver that can be ported.
Has anyone (I say anyone, I mean devs) had a look at the Xperia Play GPU drivers yet? Same chipset, but apparently heavily optimised drivers. I think LeeDrOiD was going to look into it but I'm not sure if he got round to it.
+1
Even an employee in Qualcomm said that the graphic driver in desire hd is somewhat "immature"
But there's another possibility, the flyer may use dual channel ddrs which makes its memory bandwidth doubles the dhd, and we don't have dedicated vram, so.......?
Sent via psychic transmittion.
Attention, smartbench is always leaning towards Samsung.
Sensation in smartbench is even weaker then i9000 in gaming. But GLbenchmark tells differently, it shows 3rd gen snapdragon is faster than tegra2 in graphics(optimus 2x)
Sent via psychic transmittion.
I for one don't trust any(and I mean ANY) synthetic benchmarks.The only benchmarks I trust are the ones dedicated to a certain aspect of the device,e.g Linpack for CPU,Nenamark/GLBenchmark etc for CPU and so on.Synthetic benchmarks can be quite unreliable.
tolis626 said:
I for one don't trust any(and I mean ANY) synthetic benchmarks.The only benchmarks I trust are the ones dedicated to a certain aspect of the device,e.g Linpack for CPU,Nenamark/GLBenchmark etc for CPU and so on.Synthetic benchmarks can be quite unreliable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True.
Because those dedicated benchmarks are much more professional.
Sent via psychic transmittion.
First off, I don't want any fanboy reactions from SGS2 users or what kind of other phone. I'm just wondering why we don't have got it?
Today I played with the Arc of my nephew. And what must I say? We updated to the newest firmware before starting.
I must say that our x10 has received a very very very crappy 2.3.3 update. The Arc has ALMOST NO lags. Everything runs smoother then on our x10. They both got 1Ghz processor, how did this happen?
Also battery life is MUCH better. x10 was on lowest brightness, Arc FULL brightness both connected with wifi. X10 had a simcard, and the Arc not. But damn? Our x10 lost so many % battery in constant use while the Arc just lost 1%!!! X10 has even custom rom...
Both phones similair processor, only newer generation on Arc. Both running same clockspeed. How the heck can our x10 then perform much and much worse?
Just a few things I'm wondering, and NO I'm not going to buy a Arc. I got better things to buy
By chance any developer then can fully uncap all FPS to 60 FPS on our x10. Including 3D. I'm not expecting 3D games to run 60FPs but atleast that they will be able to reach the max FPS our GPU can handle if uncapped... The only thing we've got uncapped is 2D graphics, nothing more... And 2D graphics on Arc are still smoother...
Who will be able to make us x10 perform better? Is it kernel related? Arc has newer kernel?
I know thread is a bit messy, but how the heck can a phone with almost similair hardware (just newer generation processor and some new things) perform so much much much better? You can't make me believe that the processor in the Arc is 100% faster... Both same clockspeed just some little improvements for energy and stronger GPU, and the UI has no heavy graphics... Arc = butter smooth in scrolling and all UI related stuff.
I believe SE is capping more then only the FPS?
Did you know that the Are processor higher than X10, RAM is higher than X10 and GPU performance is higher than X10? What are you talking about? Compare a new phone appears almost 2 years later with the first Android phone from SE?
EDIT: I'm scared of this one
Both phones similair processor
--------------------------------------
almost similair hardware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better processor would also mean better gpu...
It is the processor completely. Try any phone with that gen, its the same reason those phones can overclock to 1.8 ghz comfortably
Hey guys...
My Dell with a 2.4 ghz Pentium IV running win7 runs like crap compared to my Dell with a 2.4 ghz intel core and nvidia gtx 460. Why did Dell give us such an inferior Win7?
I mean, both laptops have the same speed but the core one lasts 4x as long as the old one! They're so similar but it's so *convenient* that the newer one is running win7 better.
Doesn't anyone else think that Dell is crapping our Win7 on purpose? It's a conspiracy folks!
I guess there are several clarifications needed.
1. X10's brightness is controlled by fluorescent illuminators as compared to Arc's LED backlit. have you ever wondered why sometimes the backlight doesn't dim smoothly? fluorescent illuminated display consumes hell lot more battery as compared to LED. this is rather self explanatory.
2. the process in x10's and arc's processor are different. x10 uses 65nm while arc uses 45nm. power consumption and efficiency in both are obviously different. performance wise, different too.
3. adreno 200 and adreno 205 are of major difference. adreno 205 enables hardware accelerated flash and rendering while 200 does not. adreno 200 is ancient FYI.
4. FPS on the x10 is uncapped to 55. i suppose that doesn't make much difference with 60?
There is no "3d fps cap". This is the actual performance of Adreno200 (compare it with N1)
Cheers,
z
zdzihu said:
There is no "3d fps cap". This is the actual performance of Adreno200 (compare it with N1)
Cheers,
z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't we overclock our gpu sir ?
And why does it show 280mb ram instead of 384mb ram ?
Sorry if my question is out of topic ..
Oodie said:
Can't we overclock our gpu sir ?
And why does it show 280mb ram instead of 384mb ram ?
Sorry if my question is out of topic ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think there is a way to directly overclock GPU on SoC. it's not like in PC we have a separate graphics card to run graphic rendering.
100MB RAM is dedicated to vRAM.
silveraero said:
Did you know that the Are processor higher than X10, RAM is higher than X10 and GPU performance is higher than X10? What are you talking about? Compare a new phone appears almost 2 years later with the first Android phone from SE?
EDIT: I'm scared of this one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but ram doesnt render the ui? both 1ghz processor why is the x10 so laggy then...
Oodie said:
Can't we overclock our gpu sir ?
And why does it show 280mb ram instead of 384mb ram ?
Sorry if my question is out of topic ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you can overclock gpu by overclocking the whole processor. only gpu is not possible
KeizBaby said:
but ram doesnt render the ui? both 1ghz processor why is the x10 so laggy then...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read any of the thread?
Oodie said:
Can't we overclock our gpu sir ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but as mentioned before, you can overclock the whole chip.
Oodie said:
And why does it show 280mb ram instead of 384mb ram ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The "missing memory" is used by Linux kernel (dsp, camera, encoder and) and is not accessible by user. This is common
Cheers,
z
Old technology vs New technology...
go figure.
Thanks ToonXW , keizbaby and Z for repling. Got it now
So is there any way to overclock rhe whole chip on stock 2.3.3
Why is battery life better on Arc:
X10 65nm CPU vs 45nm on Arc
X10 998MHz @ 1300mV vs 1024MHz @ 1200mV on Arc
Alone these things make it better.
And you forgot to mention that Arc's screen reacts faster/better.
Couldn't type really fast on my X10, it didn't register some touches then. On my Arc I can type really, really fast.
All these things make it better, BUT the Arc is 1 year newer than the X10!
In 1 year hardware makes huge steps forward.
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
Flo95 said:
Why is battery life better on Arc:
X10 65nm CPU vs 45nm on Arc
X10 998MHz @ 1300mV vs 1024MHz @ 1200mV on Arc
Alone these things make it better.
And you forgot to mention that Arc's screen reacts faster/better.
Couldn't type really fast on my X10, it didn't register some touches then. On my Arc I can type really, really fast.
All these things make it better, BUT the Arc is 1 year newer than the X10!
In 1 year hardware makes huge steps forward.
Sent from my LT15i using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It reacts better because it has better fps and multi touch...
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
adham3322 said:
So is there any way to overclock rhe whole chip on stock 2.3.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernels... We wait for semc sources...
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
Already overclock CPU speed to 1.3GHz, install custom ROM if you want it.
The differences between the X10 and Arc are CPU, RAM, GPU. Same CPU name with different code 200-205, RAM: 384/512, GPU is included on CPU so new CPU technology mean better GPU. That why everything on ARC is smoother than X10. You must know exactly what you are talking about, not only the value of processor.
The x10 is pretty damn smooth now, I get all day usage from it, constantly on WiFi. The people complaining must have forgotten what 1.6 was like, it's night and day now.
Sent from my X10i using XDA Premium App