What is SE playing at? - XPERIA X10 General

Ok so,
The X10 has a 16M colour screen
The X10 has a Multi-Touch capable screen
The X10 has Wireless N capability (not yet confirmed!)
The X10 has a powerful CPU
And yet Sony Ericsson dose not make use of these features.
Did they just add the more expensive hardware to push the price of the phone up?
Sure seems that way.
What they are doing is like buying more RAM for your PC and not actually using it. Just putting it on the desk to sit there and collect dust.
I just don't get it at all. Makes not sense what so ever.
If Jeff is still here maybe you would like to comment on this?

I think their software developers just suck. They make amazing hardware but fail at software on everything. I have owned 2 SE phones in the past and both had buggy interface. Same for earlier versions of the PSP. Sony is a hardware company.

I have owned 4 SE's and it always seems to be the same problem. You think I would have learned my lesson.
SE like to use the latest hardware in their advertising to trick customers into thinking that SE phones actually use the latest hardware. This is how SE push up the price of their devices. Then they promise customers that their device will be able to run the latest features once their product gets a software update, in the not too distant future of course. This usually takes around a year. Then while you're waiting for their update service, they try to compare their product with features their devices will have in the future, to what other products are actually currently using. And, SE never take into account that by the time their product is updated, that it will be updated to OUTDATED software. Then you have to sit back and watch whilst nearly every other flagship device from their competitors are enjoying feature you will never have on your SE device. Some times these other devices are even running the latest features on less hardware. And finally after all this, SE announce their next product release and repeat the whole process all over agian.
Nearly a years wait and still waiting just so we can import face book contacts! What a joke. (very slight exaggeration, but you get the point)
I tried to tell people this would happen back in April. I hate to say I told you so, but...
To say I will never buy another Sony or SE product as long as I live would be an understatement.

mackdaddy187 said:
I think their software developers just suck. They make amazing hardware but fail at software on everything. I have owned 2 SE phones in the past and both had buggy interface. Same for earlier versions of the PSP. Sony is a hardware company.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could have said it better myself.
SE is all about the hardware.
The development team seems mediocre and that's too bad.
Well, let's hope the bootloader gets cracked...

Maybe SE will see the light an actually get their **** together!.
I will be contacting the CEO of SE about this as well.. I don't expect id get a reply or even a decent one if i do but meh

this thread contributes nothing

Related

Sony Ericsson bats bravely for Android 1.6

It is not every day that a cellphone manufacturer sets out its stall to defend an older operating system. Well, that is exactly what Sony Ericsson did at a press briefing (or discussion, as they preferred to call it) in Delhi yesterday as it tried to explain to selected members of the press why Android 1.6 was not too far behind Android 2.1 and even 2.2. The reason for this faith in the older version of Android is simple – Sony Ericsson has no fewer than three devices (the Xperia X10, the X10 mini and the X10 mini pro) running on the platform.
Sony Ericsson’s argument was that while there was no doubting that the devices ran on an older version of Android, the company had company had done more than enough to include features in its UI (called UIX) to make it comparable with newer versions of the OS. Features like better camera controls, Timescape, Mediascape and improved media players, claimed the company brought the X10 range of devices very close to anything that Android 2.1 devices could deliver. With the exception of multi-touch, as one gentleman from the company added. What’s more, while a major update to the X10 would take it up to Android 2.1 later this year, there would also be a number of smaller tweaks that would continue improving the user experience (such as allowing them to use Timescape without going to the device’s browser, and improvements to the browser itself) on the device, beginning with an update coming in a couple of weeks.
For all the company’s claims, however, it was difficult not to feel a tinge of regret that all the hard work put into the interface layer had not gone into Android 2.1, which all said and done, is a few streets ahead of 1.6 in terms of appearance and performance. Especially when one considers the fact that the X10 was rolled out well after (almost four months after) the Motorola Droid/Milestone which was already running Android 2.0 (later updated to 2.1). Yes, there is no doubting that Sony Ericsson has done a lot with Android 1.6, more perhaps than any cellphone manufacturer, but there is also no doubting the fact that its decision to choose 1.6 rather than a newer version of Android on one of the most powerful configurations seen on a smartphone was more than a little befuddling. The company executives can rail on about the fact that “user experience is more important than the version of the OS” (yes, one of them actually said that) and the fact that the “X10 performs as well if not better than any device running Android 2.1, with the exception of multi-touch” (yes, that was said too), but these claims are undermined by the fact that a person who pays a premium price for a handset expects it to be running the latest software in town. And heck, if 1.6 was SO hot, why on earth is Sony Ericsson itself working on an update to 2.1?
It was a brave innings by Sony Ericsson for Android 1.6, but alas, it was in a losing cause. There is no doubt that the X10 is one of the best Android 1.6 devices in town, but it would have perhaps been the best smartphone in the world had it run 2.1. And by the time it does get down to running 2.1, the Android world would have perhaps moved on to 2.2 and beyond. Time and updates wait for no one in the tech world, not even Sony Ericsson.
This happened recently in india,Sony Ericsson organised a Round Table Android Meet where they were to discuss about there Android commitment.
Sony Ericsson India also said that , they are Committed to Providing Updates to Xperia X10 throughout it’s Lifecylce.
here is da link http://onlygizmos.com/sony-ericsson-bats-bravely-for-android-1-6/2010/06/
there would also be a number of smaller tweaks that would continue improving the user experience (such as allowing them to use Timescape without going to the device’s browser, and improvements to the browser itself) on the device, beginning with an update coming in a couple of weeks.
this really looks promising..i guess SE r really improving da overall UI..doing everything inside timescape looks very promising indeed...i hope dey roll da update soon
Look what froyo adds to the table for android. 2.1 update might be big for SE but the standard by then will be 2.2. Again with the catch up game.
Not a good sign at all from SE.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Like da way dey did with 1.6 including some features of 2.1. i feel SE will include some features of 2.2 in 2.1 update
Judging from past exeprience (X1), I doubt X10 will ever see Froyo (unless rooted of course)... We'll be lucky if we get 2.1 this year, knowing SE software upgrade practices I won't be surprised if 2.1 gets pushed for Q1 then Q2... 2011
And before we know - ups "the lifespan" of the device will end "Come and by our new X100 (or whatever)". Welcome to the world of Sony Ericsson!
leobg said:
Judging from past exeprience (X1), I doubt X10 will ever see Froyo (unless rooted of course)... We'll be lucky if we get 2.1 this year, knowing SE software upgrade practices I won't be surprised if 2.1 gets pushed for Q1 then Q2... 2011
And before we know - ups "the lifespan" of the device will end "Come and by our new X100 (or whatever)". Welcome to the world of Sony Ericsson!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly!
How about getting the battery life to what was promised at time of sale? When to do we hear SE talk about this issue. And, since there is never any mention of what the planned life cycle is, it is like promising nothing! Political BS.
And, I would like to correct one other point someone mentioned. By the time the X10 gets 2.1, the standard will be 2.3 (not 2.2), and there is a massive difference.
And, how about the fact the flash 10.1 will only be compatible with 2.2 or higher?
Still hoping for 2.2 they should skip 2.1
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk
leobg said:
Judging from past exeprience (X1), I doubt X10 will ever see Froyo (unless rooted of course)... We'll be lucky if we get 2.1 this year, knowing SE software upgrade practices I won't be surprised if 2.1 gets pushed for Q1 then Q2... 2011
And before we know - ups "the lifespan" of the device will end "Come and by our new X100 (or whatever)". Welcome to the world of Sony Ericsson!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, because HTC didn't just abandon the one year old HTC Magic, right?
Perspective people! It's not just SE... every company out there does this, and to think that some other company is going to be any better is deluding yourself.
Htc did a great job on the magic,with the sense ui ,i think they did a great job if you think of the hardware limitation this unit have.
i doubt X10 will sell much in India anyway.....the android platform hasnt taken over the apple market share yet.
much youngsters are still drawn to iphone 3gs.
anyway...i am waiting for updates.
main issues: Low in-call volume, poor battery life, limited functionality of timescape.
Yeah I had wanted to go to that round table conference. Take a bat and give some o the Sony execs a piece o my mind. How could the dev and execs of SE be.ok with releasing their flagship phone with an outdated OS. It's ridiculous! It's like putting ur ferrari in a race to be driven by your grandmother.
Man I hope root is achieved. I kinda like the stuff that SE has.done to make the phone different from the others. But I like better call.volume, flash support, better battery life, more RAM, auto flash, root requiring apps, etc more. So its going to be the vanilla froyo ftw for me.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
ashman84 said:
Yeah I had wanted to go to that round table conference. Take a bat and give some o the Sony execs a piece o my mind. How could the dev and execs of SE be.ok with releasing their flagship phone with an outdated OS. It's ridiculous! It's like putting ur ferrari in a race to be driven by your grandmother.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're so cute!
Hey, look at me, I'm a major international corporation! I have a product for sale! It has a slightly out of date operating system! Please don't buy our product! It's terrible that we included most of the functionality from the newer OS in our build of the older OS! We are a terrible company!
--
Now, do you think Sony Ericsson is really going to come out and tell you "Yes, our phone sucks don't buy it"? Of course they're going to defend their choices, if they don't then it's called a marketing failure. No one's going to tell you their product sucks and still expect people to buy it.
iead1 said:
You're so cute!
Hey, look at me, I'm a major international corporation! I have a product for sale! It has a slightly out of date operating system! Please don't buy our product! It's terrible that we included most of the functionality from the newer OS in our build of the older OS! We are a terrible company!
--
Now, do you think Sony Ericsson is really going to come out and tell you "Yes, our phone sucks don't buy it"? Of course they're going to defend their choices, if they don't then it's called a marketing failure. No one's going to tell you their product sucks and still expect people to buy it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off, thanks for compliment. I hope ur a 22 year old, 5 8" smoking hot woman who didnt go dancing with her girlfriends tonight and instead sat her a** down in front of a computer to randomly comment on xda.
secondly, SE has historically always been flaky with providing upgrades for their phones. Although they say that they will support the x10, its almost a given that they wont stick to their timelines. Its been the case with every phone they've released.
thirdly, what are the functionalities that they've included in 1.6 that you speak of??? To have an OS that cannot support 16M colors when the hardware can? TO have an OS that cannot support more RAM than 256MB? To not have flash support for god knows how long considering we're only getting 2.1 in Q4 and we need 2.2 for flash support? To be left behind in Android market cause all new apps will be for 2.1 or 2.2? To not have auto flash on the camera which is supposedly a limitation of 1.6?
And lastly, I wasn't taking a dig at the marketers of the phone. its their job to sell the phone and from what I can gather, they seem to be doing a good job. What my peeve was about is that at the design and execution stage the devs and execs at SE should have made a conscious effort to put the best in their best phone. I dont care if the x10 had a marketing failure. Its specs are good enough for anyone to figure out the phone's brilliant. There was a strategy planning and execution failure for the x10 at SE and that's just not done when your company is worth 6.7 billion (at last count). It should've had 2.1 right from the get go considering other phones released before the x10 had 2.1 as stock.
So please, dont go running your mouth off if you dont know facts. Anyone who can see what the x10 is capable of will realize that its the OS thats keeping this phone back. I love the x series of SE. I've had them all. I just want my phone to be the best it can be, which it isn't right now.
and on side notes:
A) Android 1.6 isn't a SLIGHTLY outdated OS. Its outdated period. Especially since 2.2 is out and 2.3 at the end of the year.
B) "we included most of the functionality from the newer OS in our build of the older OS! "
a grandmom on steriods is still a grandmom on steroids.
ashman84 said:
First off, thanks for compliment. I hope ur a 22 year old, 5 8" smoking hot woman who didnt go dancing with her girlfriends tonight and instead sat her a** down in front of a computer to randomly comment on xda.
secondly, SE has historically always been flaky with providing upgrades for their phones. Although they say that they will support the x10, its almost a given that they wont stick to their timelines. Its been the case with every phone they've released.
thirdly, what are the functionalities that they've included in 1.6 that you speak of??? To have an OS that cannot support 16M colors when the hardware can? TO have an OS that cannot support more RAM than 256MB? To not have flash support for god knows how long considering we're only getting 2.1 in Q4 and we need 2.2 for flash support? To be left behind in Android market cause all new apps will be for 2.1 or 2.2? To not have auto flash on the camera which is supposedly a limitation of 1.6?
And lastly, I wasn't taking a dig at the marketers of the phone. its their job to sell the phone and from what I can gather, they seem to be doing a good job. What my peeve was about is that at the design and execution stage the devs and execs at SE should have made a conscious effort to put the best in their best phone. I dont care if the x10 had a marketing failure. Its specs are good enough for anyone to figure out the phone's brilliant. There was a strategy planning and execution failure for the x10 at SE and that's just not done when your company is worth 6.7 billion (at last count). It should've had 2.1 right from the get go considering other phones released before the x10 had 2.1 as stock.
So please, dont go running your mouth off if you dont know facts. Anyone who can see what the x10 is capable of will realize that its the OS thats keeping this phone back. I love the x series of SE. I've had them all. I just want my phone to be the best it can be, which it isn't right now.
and on side notes:
A) Android 1.6 isn't a SLIGHTLY outdated OS. Its outdated period. Especially since 2.2 is out and 2.3 at the end of the year.
B) "we included most of the functionality from the newer OS in our build of the older OS! "
a grandmom on steriods is still a grandmom on steroids.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, you said you wanted to take a baseball bat to the Sony execs, so yes, you are taking a dig at the marketers of the phone. A pretty big, violent dig.
Second, I'm not just talking crap. Sony added a lot of stuff to 1.6 that didn't exist before, like the Camera app, Mediascape, and the custom dialer.
Third, and this is the biggest point of all, simply put, the phone was never, ever, ever, ever, ever advertised as having anything at all other than Android OS version 1.6. You can cry all you want about this point, but, if you bought this phone, you knew it coming in. If there's something you wanted that was 2.1 specific, you should have went for a phone that had 2.1 preinstalled. It was known for months that the phone would release with 1.6.
It's this last point that really just boggles my mind. I don't understand people who buy something, knowing 100% of it's capabilities, then ***** when it doesn't do something it wasn't advertised as being able to do. It's like buying a Toyota Prius, knowing it's a Toyota Prius, then complaining after you buy it that it doesn't perform like a Ferrari. If you wanted something that performed like a Ferrari, you should have bought the Ferrari.
The phone can be "better." Anything can be "better", but for what was advertised, it's as good as it was made out to be.
Side note:
1.6 is only "slightly" outdated. It was released September 16, 2009. In the time between then and now, only one update has been officially released. At the release of the phone, the 1.6 was only about 7 months old. It's not Sony's fault that Google pushes out new updates faster than manufacturers can handle them.
ashman84 said:
secondly, SE has historically always been flaky with providing upgrades for their phones. Although they say that they will support the x10, its almost a given that they wont stick to their timelines. Its been the case with every phone they've released.
thirdly, what are the functionalities that they've included in 1.6 that you speak of??? To have an OS that cannot support 16M colors when the hardware can? TO have an OS that cannot support more RAM than 256MB? To not have flash support for god knows how long considering we're only getting 2.1 in Q4 and we need 2.2 for flash support? To be left behind in Android market cause all new apps will be for 2.1 or 2.2? To not have auto flash on the camera which is supposedly a limitation of 1.6?
And lastly, I wasn't taking a dig at the marketers of the phone. its their job to sell the phone and from what I can gather, they seem to be doing a good job. What my peeve was about is that at the design and execution stage the devs and execs at SE should have made a conscious effort to put the best in their best phone. I dont care if the x10 had a marketing failure. Its specs are good enough for anyone to figure out the phone's brilliant. There was a strategy planning and execution failure for the x10 at SE and that's just not done when your company is worth 6.7 billion (at last count). It should've had 2.1 right from the get go considering other phones released before the x10 had 2.1 as stock.
So please, dont go running your mouth off if you dont know facts. Anyone who can see what the x10 is capable of will realize that its the OS thats keeping this phone back. I love the x series of SE. I've had them all. I just want my phone to be the best it can be, which it isn't right now.
and on side notes:
A) Android 1.6 isn't a SLIGHTLY outdated OS. Its outdated period. Especially since 2.2 is out and 2.3 at the end of the year.
B) "we included most of the functionality from the newer OS in our build of the older OS! "
a grandmom on steriods is still a grandmom on steroids.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
idiots will always be idiots, people like you would always complain and not think.
1) X10 was announced a month+ after Android 1.6 was released, 2.1 was released in january, X10 having the hardware better than the OS given shows that it's having the possibilities of having updates in the future.
Though they could have just scraped 1.6 and go for 2.1, but they wouldn't be able to keep what they promised for the consumers, namely the release date of X10, a near-somewhat stable version of UX adapted for 2.1 (tho it was still unstable for 1.6 but later on improved in minor updates) as well as timescape and mediascape, these might not be important to you but if they're not you might have gone for HTC instead (which makes me wonder why on earth you'd go for X10 if not for their unique UX and apps).
2) As big as a company can get, they wouldn't be able to have some of their resources to work only for constantly updating X10 for every new version of Android OS released by Google (1.6 - september, 2.1 - january, 2.2 - may) as SE has other phones to work on as well (for new, old, unannounced products etc)
before you go on talking about HTC manages to pull that off, answer me this, how many android phones were announced/released by HTC from early 2010 until now? at the rate they're in, do you think they'll support the old phones constantly with updates? I bet they'll keep on releasing android smartphones with the latest firmware and leave the old products to dry after an update or 2. SE on the other hand told us that they're trying to have X10 to have a long life-cycle (as late as the update may be)
as for your sidenote
A) 1.6 IS slightly outdated, it's been out since september 2009 and as I said, Android OS seems to have a life-expectancy of 4-5 months, majority of Android phones would be outdated every 4-5 months as well following your logic.
How about the Droid getting 2.2 today.

SE wants to become Android's largest handset maker...

I'm a big SE fan, but this somehow makes me smile....
www.businessweek.com/news/2010-09-0...e-world-s-largest-android-phone-supplier.html
Haha Darn! you beat me by a minute!
It'll be the Japanese market.. the X10 is more popular than air over there..!!!!
More like Android 1.6's largest handset maker
yeah and i want to become worlds greatest dictator
I wouldn't dismiss the idea that quickly. Here in Sweden SE is a very popular brand and by the looks of it they're popular in Japan as well. If they decide to go with Android on all their future phones and start marketing them more aggressively in the US they have a chance. They have the production capacity for it, they're well known and even if all models aren't fantastic there's no denying the build quality of their devices. Even though I've passed up SE phones because of their crappy software I've always been impressed by how well built and solid their phones feel.
With good marketing and if they get better at working on Android their chances are pretty good. They have the infrastructure to reach that goal, that goes a long way.
Yes, but you must agree that their android software department need to be improved in order to reach that goal...
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
mezo9090 said:
Yes, but you must agree that their android software department need to be improved in order to reach that goal...
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, but keep in mind that the X10 series is the first time SE has used it. I'd be more worried or surprised if there weren't any bumps in the road.
Just looking at the updates we've had so far they've improved a lot. Fixing the battery issue, improving the built-in software and so on.
ddewbofh said:
Agreed, but keep in mind that the X10 series is the first time SE has used it. I'd be more worried or surprised if there weren't any bumps in the road.
Just looking at the updates we've had so far they've improved a lot. Fixing the battery issue, improving the built-in software and so on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude its not about flaws in their software ... its about how they handle it ...
the incall volume is so ****ed up for a lot of people - when you talk to the customer support they tell you something like this "for me its okay - if you dont like it you can send your phone in" their official support form is full with topics about it ... same goes for the standby time ... it says 17 days on their homepage ... i asked customer support about it and he told me my phone must be damaged - i can send it in ... (he also said he gets 3 days of standy - i am pretty sure it doesnt even last 17 days when you turn it completely off^^)
i knew the support would suck ... but the hardware is quite good (besides from the lack of multitouch) - i just bought it coz i have faith in the community that they ll release custom roms soon
SE has released only one(3 version of same) android phone in the market in past 2 years when HTC has released atleast 4 or 5 and plus they are upto 2.2 on most of their phones. I don't think SE can catch to them any time soon just based ads showing Timescape
SE ship twie the number of phones as compared to HTC having come down from a stage where they shipped 6x more phones. So they are pretty capable as we all know. Now with Sony into the mix, SE phones would have PS3 compatibility, remote play, access to Sonys own online store, access to more Sony brands like VAIO, BRAVIA, etc. Well..
Sony has been associated with Ericsson for ages (from an IT time perspective) so one would think they'd at least be nipping at Nokia's heels by now. But who knows? Maybe Android will be the push they need to pump some much needed energy in to the brand? Time will tell, as long as they don't ditch Android I'll stay satisfied.
xGary said:
More like Android 1.6's largest handset maker
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
right 100%
Yeah that'll only happen if the secret owner of Sony Ericsson is Chuck Norris... cause only Chuck Norris can make that happen..! lol
They sure have the hardware capacity to get it done, but they are just so stupid and arrogant that I do not think it'll ever happen.
If they're serious, I'd swap in the current software department for some new blood.
It's really crazy how companies nowadays can't even get simple things done right.
As the old saying goes... "too many chiefs and not enough indians".
Until SE gets their act together and stops all the internal bickering and movement within the ranks, this will never be a realistic goal for them to achieve.
I think it's time we eased up on slamming SE. Since we don't actually know how the process works internally it's unpossible to tell if they're just lazy, they're still getting used to a new product line or any other unforeseen problem for that sake.
I intentionally refrain from calling them incompetent simply because my experiences with their products in the past has been great and I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt.
ddewbofh said:
I think it's time we eased up on slamming SE. Since we don't actually know how the process works internally it's unpossible to tell if they're just lazy, they're still getting used to a new product line or any other unforeseen problem for that sake.
I intentionally refrain from calling them incompetent simply because my experiences with their products in the past has been great and I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with your statement. We don't really know the reason. I read it in some post somewhere else that it's ready, but they want to test it thoroughly before releasing to the general public...
Whoever is responsible for being so slow to update, I somehow doubt that it's their developers. They are just doing what they are told by management. If Sonys developers are anything like other software devs I know they are not too happy with releasing their product with 1.6 instead of 2.1 or 2.2...
ddewbofh said:
...unpossible...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impossimpable! (Hope someone gets it - HIMYM).
jk btw don't take badly

Sony ericsson likes the update game

we have been through a very harsh process of finally getting the 2.1 update on our phones, SE said to have another update on the UIX by december and now I have seen the multi touch working officialy by Rikard on the SE Blog, said by him to have it enabled by the next year Q1 with another update.
This looks like the guys over SE likes to keep their users kind of frustrated with future hopes of getting the phone better with updates, I'm starting to think that they see this like a game
ellokomen said:
we have been through a very harsh process of finally getting the 2.1 update on our phones, SE said to have another update on the UIX by december and now I have seen the multi touch working officialy by Rikard on the SE Blog, said by him to have it enabled by the next year Q1 with another update.
This looks like the guys over SE likes to keep their users kind of frustrated with future hopes of getting the phone better with updates, I'm starting to think that they see this like a game
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If they are updating the OS frequently it only shows how they care for their device and want it to be better in my opinion.
Why does it bother you if they are working on an update?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Versus the non-update game SE typically does?
I'm fine with them improving our phones. Bring it on SE!
Btw there isn't an update in December....that was pushed to "early 2011" and my guess is that multitouch will be included in that update
pngface said:
that was pushed to "early 2011"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the update comming out to SEUS 31/03-11 (The day before the 4. Quarter)
Maybe Sony Ericsson dont have lots os programmers, and they are not good enough to do the things before the others, the Android 1.6 are ver good costumized by SE, but there are things that needs to be programmed, like:
- Multitouch (driver)
- 16M colors (driver)
- Audio (actual driver is very bad)
- Android 2.2 (costumize and optimize to X10)
I would rather say that they have very good cryptographic team, because that is from what I can see, the best they have on their hardware.
The update in December is delayed to Q1, its the same as the one Rikard mentioned. However this will be another big update, not just enabling partial MT. Though the FW is set to launch in early January, so we should see alot of these new FW stuff at CES which I'll also be there
unknown13x said:
The update in December is delayed to Q1, its the same as the one Rikard mentioned. However this will be another big update, not just enabling partial MT. Though the FW is set to launch in early January, so we should see alot of these new FW stuff at CES which I'll also be there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool! Its been a while since we've heard from you
Any idea what the other features are? (*hint* - froyo ? )
Update game or not, im personally fine with it and I think it only shows SE cares about us and the device. They weren't going to implement multi touch but I think they chose to do so because of us the users. If you ask me I say bravo to SE and this might restore some faith into the SE bashers.....it could be a possible sign for froyo.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
I can't help but laugh at all the haters who already sold their phones after reading this, i knew about the update but not that it would bring MT.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Tjotte said:
I can't help but laugh at all the haters who already sold their phones after reading this, i knew about the update but not that it would bring MT.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The X10 was, up to just recently, an incredibly crippled phone. Officially running 1.6 into the tenth month of 2010 is an embarrassment. I wouldn't laugh at anyone who decided to cut their losses and look for a better alternative.
The devs on XDA deserve a lot of credit for their perseverance. It is them that made this phone relevant again. Not SE's "brilliant engineers".
jayluke said:
The X10 was, up to just recently, an incredibly crippled phone. Officially running 1.6 into the tenth month of 2010 is an embarrassment. I wouldn't laugh at anyone who decided to cut their losses and look for a better alternative.
The devs on XDA deserve a lot of credit for their perseverance. It is them that made this phone relevant again. Not SE's "brilliant engineers".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't agree more about both points.
Personally I'm still very resentful towards SE and will not buy nor recommend any of their products for a least a couple years. The whole talking up THEIR "brilliant engineers" is just more bull**** and pisses me off, is that supposed to be a slap in the face to all the devs out there working to fix their mistakes? Why not tell us the truth about the hardware all along? Why cripple your phone with outdated buggy software and program it not to have multi-touch? What is the incentive there?
At least they're finally listening to all the negative feedback they've been getting, but still...a big part of me wanted to see the devs accomplish multi-touch and Froyo before SE.
Mr Patchy Patch said:
Update game or not, im personally fine with it and I think it only shows SE cares about us and the device. They weren't going to implement multi touch but I think they chose to do so because of us the users. If you ask me I say bravo to SE and this might restore some faith into the SE bashers.....it could be a possible sign for froyo.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They LIED about the MT since the beginning man. They said the screen was resistive and not capacitive and now they say "oh...we didn't realize it was capacitive. sorry!" Right they didn't...they do not know their own hardware they are developing for?
They do not care...they launched a phone with an outdated OS when 2.1 was already out and it took them 6 months to skin it and add in their branded goods. Now the X12 is going to be launched with 2.1 when 3.0 will be out upon its launch...see a trend here? I personally do not think they care and will never buy another SE phone. Pretty sure many feel the same...see the value of the X10's on eBay now? Dirt and yet the Nexus, older, is selling for $500+ still with the vanilla OS on it. What does that tell you? Function over fashion. Bring on the 2.2 ROM from Jerpelea & Z That will be the saving grace for me and allow me to keep this phone a bit longer. Pretty much every other newer Android phone out there has MT so this phone getting MT after almost a year really is not something to be excited over. Especially when it will only be enabled for surfing and Google maps!?
Udonitron said:
They LIED about the MT since the beginning man. They said the screen was resistive and not capacitive and now they say "oh...we didn't realize it was capacitive. sorry!" Right they didn't...they do not know their own hardware they are developing for?
They do not care...they launched a phone with an outdated OS when 2.1 was already out and it took them 6 months to skin it and add in their branded goods. Now the X12 is going to be launched with 2.1 when 3.0 will be out upon its launch...see a trend here? I personally do not think they care and will never buy another SE phone. Pretty sure many feel the same...see the value of the X10's on eBay now? Dirt and yet the Nexus, older, is selling for $500+ still with the vanilla OS on it. What does that tell you? Function over fashion. Bring on the 2.2 ROM from Jerpelea & Z That will be the saving grace for me and allow me to keep this phone a bit longer. Pretty much every other newer Android phone out there has MT so this phone getting MT after almost a year really is not something to be excited over. Especially when it will only be enabled for surfing and Google maps!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a lot of hate for SE, but as long as they try to improve the SE experience for those with SE phones, I'm happy. Could they be doing better? Just enabling MT for the X10 is so much more than what they have done in the past. Maybe it's because I had a Nokia as my last phone that I'm happy with any substantial improvement in the OS, haha.
I forgot where I read it, but the turnaround time from new OS to handset is roughly 4 months (it used to be nearly 12 months). Froyo (2.2) came out in May and it's only been in the last couple months where handsets have been getting 2.2. The exception is the N1, but then again, that was sold as a phone for enthusiasts (and pretty much what they're using to test it on). When Gingerbread (2.3) comes out, you can expect at least another 4 months before it gets pushed OTA (besides the N1 and the NS). As they learn Android, I'm sure they'll be faster in issuing updates. Motorola was (and sometimes is) pretty slow in pushing updates for their phones but now they're cranking it out.
In regards to multi-touch... Did they ever say resistive? They were up front when they said it wasn't going to have MT. Yeah, but I agree they should have had it on the X10 in the first place. The N1 didn't have MT at first and they were quick to add it. Nexus One's MT is the same as the future X10 MT. They both are designed for pinch to zoom applications, its a limitation found in the hardware. Games will work but it will have the same multi-touch limitations as the N1. And of course - phones that have just come out have better multitouch... they're newer phones based on newer chipsets which use newer technologies.
I dont get the big idea about MT, its not a big thing, hardly use it on my wildfire.
In regards to the x10 launched with 1.6 for me it was running better than any other device with 2.1 on there. Touch wood but ive never had any problems apart from the in ear volume. So what if the value has dropped. Its the sentimental value that counts.
I praise the devs for their hardwork. Also SE...however i will say Rikard and SE need to get off their fat arses and stop delaying everything.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
rvictorg said:
Couldn't agree more about both points.
Personally I'm still very resentful towards SE and will not buy nor recommend any of their products for a least a couple years. The whole talking up THEIR "brilliant engineers" is just more bull**** and pisses me off, is that supposed to be a slap in the face to all the devs out there working to fix their mistakes? Why not tell us the truth about the hardware all along? Why cripple your phone with outdated buggy software and program it not to have multi-touch? What is the incentive there?
At least they're finally listening to all the negative feedback they've been getting, but still...a big part of me wanted to see the devs accomplish multi-touch and Froyo before SE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think ur taking it too far man...personally i think 1.6 was pretty good and after i updated to 2.1 i was very pleased. the updating was easy and i easily restored my contacts using the default backup and restore app
the battery life on the x10 is incredible, consitently get about 2 full days of regular usage(surfing net before classes, a little talking, some txting and listening to 1-2 hrs of music everyday). while my friend with the iphone 4 complains about terrible battery and dropped calls(he has a case too!)
the phone looks very nice and feels solid, the software isn't "buggy" i haven't had any problems with it at all(no root or anything btw). and the 2.1 version is soo smooth and looks very nice compared to say a stock android 2.1. people complain about mediascape and timescape, but personally i love them timescape doesn't use too much cpu if u disable the services (like txt, email, fb, etc) and mediascape is miles ahead of android in media playing ability.
and just to remind you, those engineers are working very hard, remember they have to develop the software for the phone from scratch and optimize every bit of it, and yes the developers here do a lot of work, but they just have to fix what the engineers messed up or modify some files, and with thousands of lines of code, its easy to mess up somewhere. im a chemical engineering major right now, and i dont know anything about computers, but in general engineers are very bright people and probably know what they are doing better than what we do.
though im not a se fanboy (this is my first se product and might be my last) some people need to tone it down. stop ranting against se like theyre the antichrist. this is my first android phone so i was still amazed with my phone even with 1.6. (android 1.6 is waaaaay better than ios 3.0) and after flashing to 2.1 my phone is enough to make my friends agree that my x10 is better than one of our friend's iphone 4 (i wouldnt be so sure of that but when they see me multitasking with widgets, live wallpaper, H connection what evr the hell that is, and removeable parts like batteries, memory, sim, etc. its hard to disagree) i will admit the x10 is nerfed by se but if you wanted a phone that focused more on android rather than custom software you should have done your research. i knew from the begining that my phone was an "android" but with se's "timescape and mediascape" ontop of "1.6" which is outdated. i also read that mt wasnt available and most likely wouldnt be. these are the things that piss people off yet these are the things you always see in online reviews, the research isnt hard. i knew what i was reading before i even knew what the terms fully meant. luckily we have devs to help fix these problems, but as i said earlier once i can upgrade i doubt ill get a se phone again (unless that psphone turns out to be real and stable, that thing looks sweet)
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
one think we should thank to the updates is that the price of the device that had dropped very down, maybe getting up right now.
so we have:
android 2.1,
1ghz,
4 inches
and
MT coming soon.
Try to catch a phone with those features with less than 360 bucks on ebay, only the X10.
I was thinking to getting the droid 2 GSM when it comes out, but now I really like my phone with those new things.
And the upcoming android 2.2 will be very welcome among us
SE works hard to make their devices with a pleasant experience, just like apple do with their iphones that have the best out-of-the-box experience among smartphone. even if Sony doesn't have the best state of the art technology on the world of android, we cannot deny that the UI has been carefully finished.
and btw, the x10 with 2.1 is among the best battery life GSM android phones right now, just ask someone who owns a Evo 4G about battery life and you will get it
Note: the H up there means HSDPA, which is commonly known as 3.5G for internet access, sometimes it will go to 3G again because of low signal or very congested network
I love the update game and hope it continues since it feels like I have a new phone every time a big update comes out. I find it incredible that people complain about SE keeping the promise they made to support the phone for 2 years.

An interesting observation - SE using cat-string theory as its main business practice

i am a business management student...so i thought of sharing my perspective over how Sony Ericsson is playing the smartphone game...
by exagerrating a lot before the product launch ...and after the launch..giving small doses of updates so customers dont change phone in the hope of getting new features.
think of it..
they build great hype for a product months before the launch by strong advertising (probably spending more on ads than R&D itself) , promising a revolutionary interface with ground breaking custom interfaces....X panels for X1 (remember?) and timescape/mediascape (biggest garbage) for X10 ..both over-ambitious
just so they can differentiate from other companies..
ya they have great product design.. which initially attracts impulse buyers...they build anticipation...so we cant wait to get our hands on their phone!
and then they finally launch the product which will NEVER have the latest updates because their entire focus was on marketing the product i.e bringing it to market before competition and capturing market share.
they never really focussed on industry shaking R&D like Apple..c'mon without Apple, touchscreen was a dead market.
and without Android...Apple had a monopoly.
This is revolution....not timescape or mediascape..which are my least favourite apps...battery sucking with extremely slow response rates.
then they ll keep launching small small updates over couple of months...more like over a year...adding little features..so we dont change brand loyalty....giving the wounded customers a faint vision of hope...
finally they release a small update and the entire community goes 'wow' with excitement...like a virgin getting his first blowjob.
by that time..the phone has suffered scratches, has started showing signs of wear..which means very low re-sale value.
and meanwhile announcement for newer model is made...slimmer, sexier with more bugs which will be fixed via update over the next upcoming year.
good strategy for a short-term profit making....but they are losing brand loyalty.
i am not gonna buy SE Xperia Arc...ya its the sexiest phone on the market.
but its like a hot model u bang and can never have a healthy relationship with...coz she is dumb and full of flaws on the inside...such as daddy issues etc.
/rant
its like they keep us jumping over small small updates like a cat does to a string which the master will never let it catch.
but its like a hot model u bang and can never have a healthy relationship with...coz she is dumb and full of flaws on the inside...such as daddy issues etc.
epic comment
well it's true and from your perspective which one is better?
i know getting a big income is the main focus of any company but hey customers loyalty also counts. it's something i hate from sony in general, they keep pushing new tech every year and let the customer to feel outdated
Epic thread.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA App
Couldn't have said it better myself, spot on mate!
Swyped from my ZDZ Froyo X10i
bang on, while i am happy with my x10 as it was my first droid comming from a long **** list of wm devices, i am also not going to be sticking with se, already contemplating the droid 2 global, yes se makes sexy phones but, im looking for something a little more with my next device.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Funny thread
so what do you think about HTC's strategy with Desire ( Desire/HD/Z )
Just because they released a better handset after a year of the previous handset's release it doesn't mean that they do not care about brand loyalty...
so what? you want them to stick with the X10 for two years while other competitors advance with technology????
believe it or not, many will buy the ARC, even more that who bought the X10...
Next time, go buy an HTC or Motorola
and by the way, Samsung is locking their bootloader so do not buy a Samsung android so you won't end up whining like many here about unlocking it, unless you like samsung
but despite all that, I would like to thank you for the effort made by you to explain what many of us are not aware of.. it's a good practice for your uni
good luck mate with your studies
Nocturnal310 said:
i am a business management student...so i thought of sharing my perspective over how Sony Ericsson is playing the smartphone game...
by exagerrating a lot before the product launch ...and after the launch..giving small doses of updates so customers dont change phone in the hope of getting new features.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I wish you luck with the business management, since your management of the English language makes me want to punch babies in the stomach.
Also, replace "Sony Ericsson" with every technology company ever and you have a point.
/thread
iead1 said:
Well, I wish you luck with the business management, since your management of the English language makes me want to punch babies in the stomach.
Also, replace "Sony Ericsson" with every technology company ever and you have a point.
/thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Grammar and syntax of the English language is not the point of XDA in MHO...
Very well written, kudos to you Nocturnal310...
@Nocturnal310:
Of course you're right. But as someone said before, you could say this about any company producing technical stuff and you would be right as well. (I expect some very negative comments on what I'm about to say...). I understand your point, but I just don't think that SE is somehow different in their approach from any other company producing consumer goods (is that right? stuff which are bought in great numbers just to be replaced by newer models...you know, we have to watch out for our English, right iead1? ). Thats quite important because we just can't expect infinite support for our product, because sooner or later (the former is more probable) it will get replaced with brand new model with brand new stuff inside making it lot more attractive. The only thing we can complain about is, that the support may have last longer... thats true. But despite all of that, I'm still not changing the brand loyalty as I just dont know what else should I buy next time. I dont like Apple and their iStuff, also don't like HTCs because of how they look. Samsung is an option, but if I should choose between Samsung and SE just by looking at the phones, SE would definitely win (and with Samsung locking their bootloaders as well, I wouldn't help myself much by buying it). You may call me a hardcore fan of SE who doesn't think about what he's buying, but thats not me. I just think that X10 was an unfortunate mistake (which I personally still love!) of SE and I really hope they will learn from it for the reasons mentioned above.
Thats my opinion and I do not force anyone to share it, but I wanted to say it, because I just don't uderstand all that poeople saying how betrayed they feel by SE.
i think SE`s problem is that they don`t really know what they do,at least so far.
they use UIQ for a while then they leave it.
they use win mo,but after x1 and x2 they desided to go for android.
but now Android is very good platform and they should find their way.i hope so.
their main mistake is that they don`t care about customers and the weak points of their products.
I must add my mustard ...
There was a time long ago, Sony Ericsson created really nice phones with a solid build quality. My x10 is 3 weeks old and is making crazy noises when twisted a bit. The whole frame is not stiff enough.
If I saw it right on arc video presentations at youtube, the crappy timescape is now a widget and it is still choppy. This uggly blue is still there. Why blue? SE colors are Green and Orange. What a bunch of stupid designers ... I think w'll have a lot of alternatives out there with lesser crappy UI-Mods.
Well, I agree with most of your points, but let's remember: they're not ceasing support, they're launching a new model and planningto lock x10 customers in outdated Android. Motorola intended to do that too, but customers did such a big buzz that they changed their minds. The bull**** about low performance on Android 2.2 is already discarded, we can see that on all the unofficially built ROMs available at xda-forums. I risk to say that even Google has his part on this entire drama. Obviously, Sony Ericsson and their UXP loaded with much more processing hunger than x10 can support is the one we should blame, because we chose to buy SE, not Google devices (which are HTC, actually ). The removal of MediaScape from Arc tells us that they know where the problem is. Let's hope they fix this "problem" on x10 too.
I truly hope no one takes my comments personally, since I'm just expressing my opinion as a SE consumer. I still like them, but not how they use my money.
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
Apple Iphone 3G is still getting latest updates - same day as the latest iPhone 4, not ALL the features because it's got old hardware but there aware of that.
SE should be aware of it to, yes x10 can run 2.1 2.2, 2.3 ect so they should. There opinion is why there not updating. (why not the majority, the users decide)
Why can't we get hardware based updates? HTC magic/hero got tons of updates..
Yes new models will come out, but it's the same OS to update, not that much off a difference, our devs do there work in spare time and takes 2-3 weeks to come up with ASOP OS, (which is what i prefer anyway). Imagine an entire DEV team full time? yes it takes more time for testing ect but still.....
At least SE have reconized they F'd up. that's the first step!
robbyf66 said:
At least SE have reconized they F'd up. that's the first step!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They say a lot. Saying and doing are not the same.
moacyrfilho said:
The removal of MediaScape from Arc tells us that they know where the problem is. Let's hope they fix this "problem" on x10 too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they removed the mediascape app because it was so hard to new people to find the music player and photo gallery.
just think about it:
you have a new phone, and you would like to play some music, you first go to the music player but you can't find it because there is no music icon on the menu
Grab a samsung phone and try to play some music, the player is called "Music", the video player is "Videos" and the gallery is "Gallery"
robbyf66 said:
Apple Iphone 3G is still getting latest updates - same day as the latest iPhone 4, not ALL the features because it's got old hardware but there aware of that.
SE should be aware of it to, yes x10 can run 2.1 2.2, 2.3 ect so they should. There opinion is why there not updating. (why not the majority, the users decide)
Why can't we get hardware based updates? HTC magic/hero got tons of updates..
Yes new models will come out, but it's the same OS to update, not that much off a difference, our devs do there work in spare time and takes 2-3 weeks to come up with ASOP OS, (which is what i prefer anyway). Imagine an entire DEV team full time? yes it takes more time for testing ect but still.....
At least SE have reconized they F'd up. that's the first step!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are comparing with 2 companies with different calibers.
Apple - every designer/ad agency/design house/design school in this world purchase their 'godly' machines for work purposes. And these macs don't come cheap, mind you. With that amount of revenue, they can afford to create an iPhone, using their 'lagless' (yeah, right) macintosh reputations to breed a colony of iZombies to support their cause.
With the iZombies having the need to own a iAmagodlyproduct, with such supporters pumping money into their pockets, they can afford to offset any losses by being nice to
Update old iPhones even if new models are out, cos they know iZombies are already impressed with them playing the nice card and that they are confident that with their good reputation and a better new phone out, A majority of iZombies who have too much money to spare will still buy it. They are just giving an aww-I understand-you-can't-afford-a-new-phone-yet-so-I-will-update-you-periodically-so-that-you-will-come-back-to-me-when-you-have-money message to the poorer parties.
Now for Sony Ericsson (or just insert any other brand names). Let me ask you. Though they are an established brand, but let me ask you, how many people will own 1 of those expensive TVs or VAIOS? Comparing with Apple, no competition.
They don't have that much extra revenue to play nice. They can only strategize and try to earn as such as possible before their products become obsolete.
It's just like people like Donald Trump, who has so much money to play with, he can just give away to some random person on the street if he wants to. But if you try doing up a business yourself, would you give away your money to charity organizations, knowing that you cannot afford to spend the money that way? Most probably not. Unless you don't mind closing down your business due to losses.
All these threads are getting sooooooo repetitive!!! There should be one big sticky for anyone who wants to ***** and complain in any way shape and form about SE. That way this form isn't flooded with every thread turning into a SE bashing thread. It really is getting tiring logging on to see what's new and the first 50 threads are people *****in about SE.
Sent from my X10a using XDA App
Lonelee - agree with much of what you say.. but it is also true that there are many many many people who go back time and time again to buy the next apple product BECAUSE they know that Apple will not leave the OS lagging behind on the old device when a new one comes out.. it's spectacularly good brand loyalty. SE (and many other) are taking a very short term view, and a missing a great opportunity to get us all on the hook for the next product..
In the UK for example, many phones bought on contract are free with a 2 yr contract tie in.. so if I know that they will look after me for 2 years, then I'll go back for more.. my contract's not due until Feb 2012.. so I'm eagerly awaiting to see their behaviour over the next 12 months!
well I m back on XDA after exiting from blackberry platform...blackberry provided me a stable messaging device for a while but as needs changed, it was very poor for browsing and getting work with attachments done.
i was at a party few weeks ago and my friend took out his Xperia Z claiming this is the best camera phone.
to his disappointment, it was the darkest blurriest pic i have seen whereas my lumia 920 took a pic with DSLR-like clarity and image characteristics.
i am not sure how much sony has improved but seems like they are still a market follower and using marketing dollars to brag about their phones that do not perform as advertised.
after having wasted my student savings on 2 of their phones, I regret and wish I had bought a better phone for my first android experience.
product lifecycle
Hi,
I am not sure if I should blame any company for moving to newer (and maybe better) products. In the android phone market we have the nearly unique situation to be able to get our hands and minds at the software which is driving the product, at least partly.
This is quite different from cars or coffeemakers.
What I would like to from Sony is that when they decide to abandon a product (eg X10), they open up the sources of drivers etc, so that interested people can maintain their products for themselves.
I can understand that they wont open up the sources for current products.
A.

Anyone else finds the hipocrisy of SE intresting?

Well, now that we've gotten 2.3 which is nice and all.
It's wellmade and all... But one thing strikes me as.. quite odd...
Remember when 2.2 roms was beginning to pop up and how people showed to SE
that hey, 2.2 WAS possible and it ran much better than their 2.1, despite their claim that it wouldnt... And SE's answer was that we wernt REALLY running Froyo, we were just using Froyo system, backported to the Eclair kernel... Now with 2.3 released. SE is doing the same? Yet now, when they do it, it's actually Gingerbread? Or have I missed something major? Im not in any way unhappy about SE releasing 2.3, dont get me wrong here.. Just finding it quite odd how a company like SE can claim it's not really froyo when XDA devs do it.. And then turn around, do it themself and claim that now it's real.
Essentially SE have proved that they excel at talking out of their own anus and wouldn't know honesty if it punched them in the face.
I was thinking exactly the same thing yesterday.
But I've been thinking for a while that SE talk out of their ass Cox when rikard said about 16m colours not being implemented coz of "too much redevelopment" which is bull coz they were developing a new os anyway but hey what can we do?
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Unfortunately there's not much we can do.
Sony probably thought that if they delay 2.3 people will jump to Arc and the rest, but realized that since many people had the X10 - they needed to save the face and act like they were in trouble.
However, the phones are not extraordinary - I find Arc buttons unappealing (1mm below and they would have been pointing down, hard for my big fingers to reach them). The others are big and clunky..
HTC is no better, you have 7 buttons to press at the bottom, 4 virtual on the phone case, 3 software on top. I have colleagues which own HTC phones for half an year and more, and they still get confused what to press when they want to show something on the phone.
Samsung and the blunder with S2 screens (yellow patch, or either too yellow color temperature) or with the battery heating etc.
Android itself is not a mature OS (I mean is stable), but after having Symbian, Windows and Android, Android gives me the impression that you have to work a lot around the software so that you can get cool things done (or nice integrations). On WM6 it showed the weather if you wanted to make an appointment - so that you know. People like it because they believe its free, but it comes with a price, you give valuable information to Google about your habits and they can sell it for much money probably that you get by having some nice apps.
And so on.
I wish Leica would build mobile phones
viulian said:
Unfortunately there's not much we can do.
Sony probably thought that if they delay 2.3 people will jump to Arc and the rest, but realized that since many people had the X10 - they needed to save the face and act like they were in trouble.
However, the phones are not extraordinary - I find Arc buttons unappealing (1mm below and they would have been pointing down, hard for my big fingers to reach them). The others are big and clunky..
HTC is no better, you have 7 buttons to press at the bottom, 4 virtual on the phone case, 3 software on top. I have colleagues which own HTC phones for half an year and more, and they still get confused what to press when they want to show something on the phone.
Samsung and the blunder with S2 screens (yellow patch, or either too yellow color temperature) or with the battery heating etc.
Android itself is not a mature OS (I mean is stable), but after having Symbian, Windows and Android, Android gives me the impression that you have to work a lot around the software so that you can get cool things done (or nice integrations). On WM6 it showed the weather if you wanted to make an appointment - so that you know. People like it because they believe its free, but it comes with a price, you give valuable information to Google about your habits and they can sell it for much money probably that you get by having some nice apps.
And so on.
I wish Leica would build mobile phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been thinking about my privacy since Google is known for stealing their users info. And yeah, Android is far from complete, rapid development shows it all.
I wondered why it ran like ****, and I knew it was too good to be true that SE would finally unleash the full potential of the X10.
I've had my X10 for 15 months now, and only 9 months to go until my contract ends. It will be the last SE phone I ever get, and I repeatedly tell anybody who asks to avoid SE phones like the plague.
@OP:
It was possible for SE because they patched the old kernel to work with GB. If you can see the kernel version that is only possible for SE since they might have modified since they have Bootloader access. We would have got much better phones only if BL was unlocked. I.e We could have changed Kernel versions.
For SE possibilities are endless because the have all the sources and they havent released it
viulian said:
Unfortunately there's not much we can do.
Sony probably thought that if they delay 2.3 people will jump to Arc and the rest, but realized that since many people had the X10 - they needed to save the face and act like they were in trouble.
However, the phones are not extraordinary - I find Arc buttons unappealing (1mm below and they would have been pointing down, hard for my big fingers to reach them). The others are big and clunky..
HTC is no better, you have 7 buttons to press at the bottom, 4 virtual on the phone case, 3 software on top. I have colleagues which own HTC phones for half an year and more, and they still get confused what to press when they want to show something on the phone.
Samsung and the blunder with S2 screens (yellow patch, or either too yellow color temperature) or with the battery heating etc.
Android itself is not a mature OS (I mean is stable), but after having Symbian, Windows and Android, Android gives me the impression that you have to work a lot around the software so that you can get cool things done (or nice integrations). On WM6 it showed the weather if you wanted to make an appointment - so that you know. People like it because they believe its free, but it comes with a price, you give valuable information to Google about your habits and they can sell it for much money probably that you get by having some nice apps.
And so on.
I wish Leica would build mobile phones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I lold at your comment for a while.
If you don't like ARC, that's your choice but what does a hardware button has to do with android OS?
Android itself is not a mature OS (I mean is stable), but after having Symbian, Windows and Android, Android gives me the impression that you have to work a lot around the software so that you can get cool things done (or nice integrations). On WM6 it showed the weather if you wanted to make an appointment - so that you know. People like it because they believe its free, but it comes with a price, you give valuable information to Google about your habits and they can sell it for much money probably that you get by having some nice apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG. Really?
I've used every OS out there,Android,Symbian,iOS,Bada OS and even OS that runs with Java support and I call you. Android is the best OS we have now.
Did you say android ain't stable? You joking right? If you use right tweaks and correct adjustments you'll see where android takes you. android has the best customizations ever. If you use something like iOS you'll see you're limited in resources like ex: overclocking which can be done on android.
WM6 is one of the crappiest OS's Ive seen. (HTC HD2) and I gotta tell you it has got nothing. No innovation nor whatsoever. Heck it does not even have Real Multi tasking (It's been implemented in orange lol).
Android currently the major and the top OS's out there and if you say it's not good either you need to check your mobile (for hardware problems) or you must be an iOS fanboy
No disrespect meant but this was my honest review.
Neo said:
@OP:
It was possible for SE because they patched the old kernel to work with GB. If you can see the kernel version that is only possible for SE since they might have modified since they have Bootloader access. We would have got much better phones only if BL was unlocked. I.e We could have changed Kernel versions.
For SE possibilities are endless because the have all the sources and they havent released it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since SE have the codes for the bootloader, they can release using any kernel they wished really... That wasnt the point though... The diffrence in the kernelversions between the two is quite minimal anyway... But I do find it intresting that SE was saying how we wernt at all running Froyo then, yet now are saying they've released Gingerbread... One or the other cannot possibly be true... Either this isnt truly Gingerbread, or we were truly running Froyo (and gingerbread) before this and not just backported parts of those. Personally, I dont really care which as Im less intrested in questions of "what is this" and more intrested in "what can this do?", and as it stands, SEs gingerbread, offers alot that XDAs devs have not been able to do yet, such as a fully working camera with the gingerbread system. Makes me wonder though... Do SE spokespeople even remember what they've said about the custom roms? Or are they simply hoping that users wouldnt notice? :/
The problem is that different people make decisions and different people are communicating them. PR people chose bad arguments because they were not expecting something will change in the future.
In business everything is about managing resources. SE were always perfectionists regarding releasing firmwares. Their firmwares are most stable in the business. There are usually only a few bugs that get fixed most of the time. Issues that SE had not fixed to date are probably hardware related. 3G battery drain and low in-call volume most probably depend on drivers, phone chips and operator hardware interactions as not everyone is experiencing them.
With such an approach SE devs are very slow compared to devs here at XDA. They also have more phones to manage at the same time so their management has to prioritize their time. This concludes into decisions that some functions can't be worked on the phones that are not the core of SE business anymore.
As most customers would not understand real reasons PR people have to choose more acceptable arguments to serve them. PR team should have chosen more bullet-proof arguments in the early X10 days. There has been a change in recent communication though.
Lately SE has been very open about the reasons for the company decisions on X10. It is just not 100% effective as usual customer do not care for the company. Customers have just their own needs and expectations. That is natural.
SE found ingenious solution for this problem. They worked on bootloader unlocking possibility for their new phone range so community devs have better access to the phone hardware. This way the community would do what they do not have time to do.
On X10 unlocking bootloader is unfortunately not possible because SE are using licenses that are binding them to protect some parts of the phone. 2011 phones were built with this option in mind hence it is possible there.
Disclaimer: I do not work for SE. I am part of a damage control team at telecommunications company and coordinating communication between our partners, suppliers and customers is my everyday job.
They don't talk nonsense, it was just a deliberate attempt to mislead. Something they have quite a reputation for.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
i think Dante-fu has pretty much hit the nail on the head. the people who make the press statements arent the people who make the firmware and updates. they dont have a dozen guys in white coats working tirelessly on one single rom and then leaving the lab to make an update based on their progress. theyve got 1000s of roms and updates to make, with sometimes a 100 versions per model of phone.. a seperate department is responsible for press releases based on their progress.
i just dont think its as cut and dry as saying.. sony said this and now theyre liars. theyre not one person, its bad enough with the small company im with, people talking about stuff they dont know or being contradicted by new facts they werent aware of. sony are 10000 times bigger and worldwide. maybe they where just plain wrong the first time and XDA showed them how to do somethign they didnt think they could do. wouldnt be the first time. they should follow samsungs lead (when they sent out the galaxy 2 to cyanogenmod) and send a few models to people on xda to play with. i reckon they could get a lot of bugs and upgrades sorted quicker by putting out a bounty to the worldwide community. would save them a lot of money in the long run lol.
zodiac100 said:
They don't talk nonsense, it was just a deliberate attempt to mislead. Something they have quite a reputation for.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
doing a little mind-reading on the side?
in the end SE gave us what we want 2.3.3. so they respect customers and we should be thankfull cause they're not forced to.. and talking about the hardware .maybe samsung or htc or even Iphone is better in specs . but the build quality of SE is awesome. that's why i'm a SE fan . btw i used smartphones since I-mate and O2
Neo said:
@OP:
I've used every OS out there,Android,Symbian,iOS,Bada OS and even OS that runs with Java support and I call you. Android is the best OS we have now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No way I'm an Apple fan boy . I've never bought Apple things in my life.
However, about Android - I sure hope you have tried programming all the OS that you mention - I tried both Symbian (standard C++) as well as Qt, Windows Mobile and Android (check my signature). Among all, Android is weird within (maybe towards the users it might look ok, but users don't care).
Objects that disappear (think broadcastreceivers) ? Activities restarted on screen rotate ? It's Java, but it acts weird - you receive objects, but not those that you believe. Also, memory management in Android is like every girl's reality strike - aggressive doesn't mean good.
In Windows mobile at least you had the plain old canvas, your objects that you left there from last run, etc. The problem was that the hardware they chosen was bad and slow - Android is fast, but I think it will struggle in the future - and they just allowed segmentation, different .apks for different type of devices - the J2ME way .... We'll see.
Guys be happy, you got your update! Now enjoy it.
Well, at least SE did something,
This phone is still much batter than so many others.
Sent from my X10i using XDA App
dante-fu said:
On X10 unlocking bootloader is unfortunately not possible because SE are using licenses that are binding them to protect some parts of the phone. 2011 phones were built with this option in mind hence it is possible there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with most of what you said... But this part, simply makes no sense... Look.
Prior to android entering the market, SE was one of the biggest players on the market. When android was released, companies that had been quite small in the phone area, was suddenly rising, but by comparison, still smaller. By the time SE released their X10 series, SE was still, one of the major players on the market. Now, minor players, managed to release phones, without locked bootloaders, without a problem, but SE does? Now, do tell me which friggin fantasy world you're living in, where SE as one of the biggest players on the market, have LESS power over the telcos, than tiny newcomers? In the real world, things like that simply dont happen. SE could have had an unlocked bootloader had they wanted to. They dont but that's fine IMO... It was well known that it was locked when it was released and so on. As I've said all along, I just find this hipocrisy to be intresting... Not wrong exactly, just intresting.
I believe that even before X10 was finished - they probably had the other ongoing projects that were meant to catch up with the competition:
a) developers were moved to those new projects leaving X10 unattended
b) hopes were that they will convince people that X10 is good enough by the time they put Play / Arc out, etc.
But unfortunately, the market starts to behave smarter I think. You can't treat people bad, and this shows in sales of Samsung / HTC, the rest (Sony/Nokia) aren't doing great. Apple is also scared, so it sues everything it can - remember the rumor of the russian guy Eldar, Samsung wants to put something out in few months - and Apple is scared not to loose the edge.
I appreciate Sony for not giving up on old phones (not like Nokia did ARRRGGGGHHHH) but I do believe there is a moment when you can say "too late". For me, I prefer to see what Samsung comes up with - for now, X10 is smooth enough...
Ether_Man said:
I agree with most of what you said... But this part, simply makes no sense... Look.
Prior to android entering the market, SE was one of the biggest players on the market. When android was released, companies that had been quite small in the phone area, was suddenly rising, but by comparison, still smaller. By the time SE released their X10 series, SE was still, one of the major players on the market. Now, minor players, managed to release phones, without locked bootloaders, without a problem, but SE does? Now, do tell me which friggin fantasy world you're living in, where SE as one of the biggest players on the market, have LESS power over the telcos, than tiny newcomers? In the real world, things like that simply dont happen. SE could have had an unlocked bootloader had they wanted to. They dont but that's fine IMO... It was well known that it was locked when it was released and so on. As I've said all along, I just find this hipocrisy to be intresting... Not wrong exactly, just intresting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
X10 was SE's first android handset. They wanted it on big carrier so they partnered with AT&T. Regardles the fact that SE mentioned legal issues specifically we all know what is AT&T capable of.
They held the iphone users from the whole world hostage for over a year. It was because of them the rest of the world couldn't send MMS, tether their connectivity or download apps like skype from the app store.
In this case I trust SE. AT&T surely bound even their soul.They partnered with devil. And their financial situation was already bad at that point.
dante-fu said:
X10 was SE's first android handset. They wanted it on big carrier so they partnered with AT&T. Regardles the fact that SE mentioned legal issues specifically we all know what is AT&T capable of.
They held the iphone users from the whole world hostage for over a year. It was because of them the rest of the world couldn't send MMS, tether their connectivity or download apps like skype from the app store.
In this case I trust SE. AT&T surely bound even their soul.They partnered with devil. And their financial situation was already bad at that point.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An SE partnership with AT&T would affect no other handset, except the AT&T ones... Also, SE doesnt play "the partner game" like Apple does. AT&T is just like any other telco in the eyes of SE.. Bigger yes, but no diffrent.

Categories

Resources