Database Users

Benchmarks

Can someone benchmark the phone with these apps and post results please.
Linpack
quadrant
neocore

shep211 said:
Can someone benchmark the phone with these apps and post results please.
Linpack
quadrant
neocore
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linpack: 8.80, 8.177, 7.961, 8.328, 8.341 (five runs)
Quadrant: 847
Neocore: 55.5fps
Fps2D: 55fps

Linpack: 7.957 (Lowest) 8.367 (Highest) of 5 runs
Neocore: 55.7
Quadrant: 870

After doing the lag fixes and clearing the cache on my rooted Vibrant, my best quadrant score on stock kernel is 950!!

zenlakin said:
After doing the lag fixes and clearing the cache on my rooted Vibrant, my best quadrant score on stock kernel is 950!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet! Just imagine how this thing'll run with CM6!

Consistently between 8.3 and 8.5 on Linpack.

These are my best scores so far
Linpack- 8.512
Neocore- 56.7
Quadrant- a big 980
im on MS_Gurus odin flash

Quadrant 915
Neocore 55.7
Cousins stock Droid scored 930 on quadrant and 23.7 on Neocore

Linpack: 8.532
NeoCore:55.4 fps
Quadrant:960

Linpack: 7.635, 8.393, 8.419, 8.419, 8.29
Neocore: 55.6 FPS
Quadrant: 899

shep211 said:
Can someone benchmark the phone with these apps and post results please.
Linpack
quadrant
neocore
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FPS2 55 Const (5 runs)
Neocore 55.8 Const (5 runs)
Quadrant 880 (Worst) 897 (best)
Linpack 7.938 8.168 8.163 8.168 8.223 (5 Runs)

Linpack MFLOPS 8.231 time 10:19 norm..5.68...
quadrant 2500+
neocore 55.7
just a couple mods

Linpack: 8.1 mflops
Neocore: 54.9 fps
Quadrant : 2060
Running ryanza's lag fix.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Linpack: 7.913 mflops
Neocore: 55.3 fps
Quadrant: 2264

hxxp://androidspin.com/2010/08/23/my-quadrant-is-bigger-than-your-quadrant/
The link is not meant to discourage the devs, but people need to understand that the performance of their device did not suddenly increase by 2x-3x just because of the lag fix. This is to help people to set their expectation in a reasonable manner.
please replace the "xx' with "tt".

http://androidspin.com/2010/08/23/my-quadrant-is-bigger-than-your-quadrant/
In case anyone didn't want to replace the letters.
I don't always complain, but when I do, I #BlameWes

vinnydakid said:
In case anyone didn't want to replace the letters.
I don't always complain, but when I do, I #BlameWes
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much!
The new poster restriction prevented me from doing so.

Neocore=55.7 fps
Quadrant=2296
Linpack=8.157
I did the lag fix from the market.

Post your 2.1 benchmark here

Please share it. Thank you
Sent from my X10a using Tapatalk

539 Quadrant....

whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?

neocore 27.7 fps

517 Quadrant

552
.

Quadrant - 547
Linpack - 6.973 MFLOP/s

james_2k said:
whats the point in benchmarking if its limited to 30fps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's lots of benchmarks you can do.. not just video recording... also a danger of this thread being a mess as everyone uses different tools.. It'll only be useful if people use the same benchmarking tools such as Quadrant and linpak.

i got 553 [Quadrant Advance]
little bit dissapointed, nexus 2.1, and motodroid 2.1 are better than ours,

quadrant :
517
sooo slow

quadrant - 560

quadrant 530

573.......

Quadrant: 517. Why is it so low? Ideas?
Linpack: 6,95 MFLOP/s

536 on mine

670 Quadrant
9.2 MFLOPS on Linpack

wtf, 670? sorry i'm gonna want some proof for that

http://db.tt/tlimV6b
http://db.tt/XXtlV8k

Quadrant: 1756
yeah, that's right it's not my X10, it's My Galaxy S
X10: 570

why is this varying between devices running on the same OS version??
Shouldn't our scores be the same? For the person who scored over 600 - are you running ADW launcher? I have a feeling ADW launcher is causing my score to be low by using too much of the CPU resources?!

Post your benchmark scores.

On CM3 the highest Ive gotten is 1013
On Linpack Ive gotten as high as 5.79
Curious to see what others are getting.

Don't have CM3.
5.28 on Linopack.
Offtopic:
(on Linpack's latest runs website saw 51.1 and 88 on a G2 !! - running @ 1.5 and 1.4 mhz respectively. I mean, Dude!).
My un-overclocked CM 6.1 Froyo Nexus tops at 35 MFlops. I'll try to downgrade it to 2.1 to be able to compare apples to apples.​
Quadrant Standard: 550 (for comparison, my Froyo Nexus: 1430, but 2.1 stock Nexus: 520).
I do not feel my S7 slow, laggy or lazy in any aspect though.

Linpack: 5.45
Quadrant: 550
Sent from my Ideos S7 using XDA App

I am getting around 524 on my Quadrant score with the S7.

Same as you guys.

linpack
mflops 6.07
norm res:5.68

Singapore set
Linpack: 6.988
Quadrant: 1506

Quadrant - 627
Linpack - 7.045
Huawei S7 Life Edition. ROM Australia Telsta. Boot onliner.by edition

Benchmark Bragging

Most people on this forum have tinkerer with their xoom, and at some point ran quadrant and linpack. I'm curious as to who has the fastest benchmark xoom.
We all know benchmarks don't mean squat in the real world but its still cool to OC it and see what it will do.
So post up your quadrant and linpack scores and at what speed
Mine @ 1.6
Quadrant 4513, it ran 4517 however was unable to get a screen shot.
68.772 linpack. Ranks 124 of all devices

I got 4157 as my highest on quad (1.6 ghz) but I got a 69.4 on linpack (screenshot lost when I had to flash stock images to recover, also at 1.6 ghz) ( its a GIF, so the app doesn't like it)
http://db.tt/GQ8XznI
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App

This is kinda weird for a brag I guess, but I get 3758 on quadrant and 60 on linpack with the 1.4ghz 1.4.2 kernel.

ICS benchmarks versus GB

Previously with GB:
Browsermark - 99,857
Sunspider - 1826ms
ICS after this mornings update:
Browsermark - 124,672
Sunspider - 1488ms
Wow, roughly 25% improvement in both

Could you please try a full benchmark with Quadrant?

Quadrant standard full benchmark - 3748 (3871 on second run)

straxusii said:
Quadrant standard full benchmark - 3748
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
So a little bit higher than the score with ICS Stunner. Hope NeoBuddy updates it soon.

No real difference with quadrant, I think that was roughly the same as my GB score

oh ........great benchmarks .....why are people obsessed with synethetic benchmarks?

CF Bench 1.2 - Overall score 7601

Richy99 said:
oh ........great benchmarks .....why are people obsessed with synethetic benchmarks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a geek thing methinks. Tried Quadrant on my Note running stock UK GB just now it got a score of 3977 & 3668 & 3732 which is faster than anything I ever owned...but it still lags like ****.

Quadrant Full Benchmark Results -
Stock GB 2.3.6 - 2684
Current Stock ICS 4.0.3 (German release) - 3445

Antutu?

Castellano2 said:
Antutu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bungaga
Sent from my Xoom using xda premium

I am getting around 3800 in Quadrant on ICS LiquidSmooth and I was getting about 3200 on official GB.

zen123 said:
Its a geek thing methinks. Tried Quadrant on my Note running stock UK GB just now it got a score of 3977 & 3668 & 3732 which is faster than anything I ever owned...but it still lags like ****.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep my turbo ricer pimped Honda makes 430hp on the dyno but still sucks in the 1/4 mile.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk

Can someone please post a Nenamark 2 and GLBenchmark Egypt or Pro offscreen?
Thank you!

Castellano2 said:
Antutu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu 2.7.3 - 6769

MindBlank said:
Can someone please post a Nenamark 2 and GLBenchmark Egypt or Pro offscreen?
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GLBenchmark 2.1.4, Egypt 2.1 standard - 46fps (was vsync limited at times)

Can you please try the offscreen bench for Egypt?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA

MindBlank said:
Can you please try the offscreen bench for Egypt?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
60 fps

48 fps on stock GB. Very nice increase of 12 fps. I'm running an OC'ed GPU on GB (400Mhz) and it gives 68 fps. So the increase in case of ICS + 400Mhz GPU would be 85 fps. Can't wait to flash it.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA

straxusii said:
Previously with GB:
Browsermark - 99,857
Sunspider - 1826ms
ICS after this mornings update:
Browsermark - 124,672
Sunspider - 1488ms
Wow, roughly 25% improvement in both
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very, very good scores. These best everything AnandTech has ever benchmarked, with the exception of the Lava XOLO and SGS 3. Absolutely dusts the iPhone 4S, wow.