http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100823006066/en
Corning Supplies Gorilla® Glass for Samsung Galaxy S Premium Smartphone
Evolution of Smartphones Led by Cutting-edge Display Technologies
SEOUL, South Korea--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Corning Incorporated (NYSE: GLW), a world leader in specialty glass and ceramics, announced today that Corning® Gorilla® glass has been designed into the Samsung Electronics Galaxy S, a newly released premium smartphone.
“Advanced display technology plays a crucial role in meeting consumers’ growing expectations on high-end mobile devices, especially smartphones. Corning’s Gorilla glass has helped maximize Galaxy S’s unique smartphone features by enabling a high-quality touch display.”
The Samsung Galaxy S features a four-inch super AMOLED display, while weighing roughly 119 grams in a slim, highly durable design. The enhanced super AMOLED display is enabled in part by using Corning Gorilla glass as the protective cover. Gorilla glass is an environmentally friendly alkali-aluminosilicate thin sheet glass that is both scratch resistant and durable.
BJ Kang, senior manager of Samsung Electronics said, “Advanced display technology plays a crucial role in meeting consumers’ growing expectations on high-end mobile devices, especially smartphones. Corning’s Gorilla glass has helped maximize Galaxy S’s unique smartphone features by enabling a high-quality touch display.”
Haeng Hee Lee, president of Corning Korea Company Ltd added, “Device makers are challenged with designing stylish yet durable products. The Galaxy S is a fine example of a premium device created through the combination of Corning’s specialty glass and Samsung’s mobile display technologies. Corning’s Gorilla glass enables device makers to introduce durable display products with innovative designs.”
More than 20 major makers of PC and handheld devices have already recognized the benefits of Gorilla glass by designing it into more than 225 devices, and more than 55 models will be released over the next six months.
Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995), which are based on current expectations and assumptions about Corning’s financial results and business operations, that involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. These risks and uncertainties include: the effect of global political, economic and business conditions; conditions in the financial and credit markets; currency fluctuations; tax rates; product demand and industry capacity; competition; reliance on a concentrated customer base; manufacturing efficiencies; cost reductions; availability of critical components and materials; new product commercialization; pricing fluctuations and changes in the mix of sales between premium and non-premium products; new plant start-up or restructuring costs; possible disruption in commercial activities due to terrorist activity, armed conflict, political or financial instability, natural disasters, adverse weather conditions, or major health concerns; adequacy of insurance; equity company activities; acquisition and divestiture activities; the level of excess or obsolete inventory; the rate of technology change; the ability to enforce patents; product and components performance issues; retention of key personnel; stock price fluctuations; and adverse litigation or regulatory developments. These and other risk factors are detailed in Corning’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the day that they are made, and Corning undertakes no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events.
About Corning Incorporated
Corning Incorporated (www.corning.com) is the world leader in specialty glass and ceramics. Drawing on more than 150 years of materials science and process engineering knowledge, Corning creates and makes keystone components that enable high-technology systems for consumer electronics, mobile emissions control, telecommunications and life sciences. Our products include glass substrates for LCD televisions, computer monitors and laptops; ceramic substrates and filters for mobile emission control systems; optical fiber, cable, hardware & equipment for telecommunications networks; optical biosensors for drug discovery; and other advanced optics and specialty glass solutions for a number of industries including semiconductor, aerospace, defense, astronomy and metrology.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ConceptVBS said:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20100823006066/en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great story, but I've seen scratch tests that seem to indicate otherwise. Also, I'm surprised that they didn't announce this earlier. I lean 80% towards this being true, but not everything is adding up to me.
alovell83 said:
Great story, but I've seen scratch tests that seem to indicate otherwise. Also, I'm surprised that they didn't announce this earlier. I lean 80% towards this being true, but not everything is adding up to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a official press release so its true.... And even diamond can be scratched
Well, I was judging these relatively versus what I've seen from GG. Again, I'm just saying that not everything adding up. Keep in mind, there are maybe 6+ models and variations, perhaps we shouldn't look further into this than it being only the I9000 without further information. After all, the US carriers did gimp phones to save themselves some money whether on the front-end (storage) or back-end (tethering/ff camera).
Also, this could've been adopted late in the development cycle so the test I watched could've been using a previously spec'd screen (I think this is the least likely). It's not like Corning or a manufacturer to announce this late. They announced this on the Streak nearly a year before it hit the US, and at least 6 months before it hit EU. This is typically a big step up for a manufacturer and a good way for Corning to get themselves recognized and desired by consumers, meaning it's good marketing for them as well. No one loves GG more than the Engadgets & GSM Arena (leap of faith there), so at least getting bonus points from them when one of the "knocks" on the Galaxy S is the industrial design. Gorilla Glass plus plastic means the screen is as strong as can be and the casing can be replaced in case the phone took a brutal fall.
So, am I saying that this is false, no, I believe the story, I just take it with a grain of salt saying that unless they confirm it on the entire family line there might be something else hidden in the details (that's where they say the devil is, )...I'm probably just looking too far into this though. ...I'm just saying is all...
Still doesn't excuse Samsung for the poor design on the international version. By that I mean having the glass go all the way down and having it cut out for the home button making it a very weak point for cracking.
All reports I've read about SGS being cracked have been down there. Same happened to mine and the shock it got was so minor I didn't even realize or think the screen would get damaged. So those with that version of the SGS be careful.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Schmich said:
Still doesn't excuse Samsung for the poor design on the international version. By that I mean having the glass go all the way down and having it cut out for the home button making it a very weak point for cracking.
All reports I've read about SGS being cracked have been down there. Same happened to mine and the shock it got was so minor I didn't even realize or think the screen would get damaged. So those with that version of the SGS be careful.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are plenty of people whose glass hasn't cracked. Remember, Samsung have sold millions of these phones, and given enough people in a forum, many people will have the same problem. I don't think this is an inexcusable mistake, or poor design. There is a border protecting the glass (which seems to be made of metal), and it's tough glass.
It isn't designed as a rugged phone, and how common is this issue?
Just watch this video and see how fragile this device is - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xASJobjD68
If you drop it during a conversation, say bye bye to this "gorilla glass".
Fatherboard said:
Just watch this video and see how fragile this device is - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xASJobjD68
If you drop it during a conversation, say bye bye to this "gorilla glass".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are u kidding? Fragile? Looks like u didnt see the whole video.
no, it looks like you haven't...
Fatherboard said:
Just watch this video and see how fragile this device is - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xASJobjD68
If you drop it during a conversation, say bye bye to this "gorilla glass".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't even worth debating. http://gizmodo.com/5571658/first-iphone-4-broken-after-one+foot-drop
You'd have to be an idiot to buy any smart phone if you are concerned about dropping it. The main benefit of Gorilla glass isn't protection (although, clearly it needs to handle everyday life), but to offer protection against scratches.. You wont have any problems if you don't drop it..
This has the tendency to happen. you guys are idiots if you think you bought a bulletproof device.
Haven't you ever dropped a cellphone during a conversation?... that's odd. I might have to replace my palms, then.
Err i think you might be the idiot mate, first you say its fragile and supply a link showing that the glass is actually quite strong (for a mobile) and then you say its no different to any other phone.
I work on a building site and i have no fears of damaging my screen although you would have to be a bit of a moron to have a phone like this and not put protection
it anyway
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
omg, no wonder you're working at a building site.
Fatherboard said:
This has the tendency to happen. you guys are idiots if you think you bought a bulletproof device.
Haven't you ever dropped a cellphone during a conversation?... that's odd. I might have to replace my palms, then.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Disregard my comment, I misinterpreted your statement. Yes, I do agree it isn't unbreakable. The purpose of gorilla glass is mainly to withstand basic knocks, and scratches, not to be immune against scratches. It isn't designed to withstand drops.
Gorilla glass or not, I already have 2 little scratches..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
leoon said:
Gorilla glass or not, I already have 2 little scratches..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 0 But it say's nothing, maybe if it was normal glass you would have 10 scratches, no one knows!
newsflash: Glass tends to scratch/break when recieving shock.
Doesn't matter in what device, if you drop it from ear-hight, it will crack. At least a bit.
I have to say i'm impressed such a hard glass plain didn't shatter even when falling from waist hight.
What about the glass that is covering the camera on the back? Any info about that? I put silicone on my SGS and still after some time I can see little tiny scraches on the glass cover.
It is quite funny in the beginning how the Iphone fan boy use to boast on the quality of Iphone that Iphone glasses are gorilla glass and samsung is not glass but plastics.
Now as more information are becoming available how the table have turned. I guess that will shut iphone fan boys up for a while.
What doesn't make sense is that why it takes so long for them to make the announcement when clearly, it could have boosted the sales.
Yea ill leave my zagg screen protector on ... knowing my luck the day i take the screen protector off. The bus or train im in will get into an accident and my phone will magically fly out of my pocket and land face first on a a screw on the ground.
Related
http://www.ijailbreak.com/iphone/iphone-5-vs-galaxy-s3-drop-test-durability-video/
Just found this
These so called drop "tests" don't make much sense. E.g. it really makes a difference if a phone lands on one of the corners or not. To draw some decent conclusions, the test setup should be way more professional. And in general, just dont drop your phone or buy a rugged IPxx certified one.
iPhone doesn't need these tests. Because they are coming damaged out of the box.
You gotta think too, weight/size ratios, type of glass, and of course luck of the fall. We know the s3 gg2 is pretty fragile due to it being thinner and more brittle, so maybe a scratch test would be in order to determine which glass is... idk... better? I mean if it's easier to scratch the i5 than the s3 ya kinda have to ask yourself, would you be more prone to drop or scratch your phone?... idk, for me yeah the i5 clearly took a drop better but why the hell would you want ios? I'd way rather have Windows than ios, of course I would/will never own anything apple in my life unless given to me, and I'd sell it anyway
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app
I've always criticised Samsung for putting plastic at the edges. People always say 'hey, what a beautiful phone you have. How is it called?' But then, they can't help but noticing the chip on the supposedly metal edges. Even though they still like the phone.
I personally do not care if everything is plastic, but let the
Chrome edges be made of metal
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
j0ep0 said:
These so called drop "tests" don't make much sense. E.g. it really makes a difference if a phone lands on one of the corners. To draw some decent conclusions, the test setup should be way more professional. And in general, just dont drop your phone or buy a rugged IPxx certified one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly - I may be biased towards the GS3, but they've just basically wasted £1000 worth of phone proving little. The GS3 may have failed due to impacting in a more critical spot, maybe not, who knows.
That said, kudos to the iPhone there, it definitely seems to be a sturdy device if you're keen on throwing your phone around lots.
the iphone 5 size looks like my S3 , can i sue apple ?
Aimara said:
the iphone 5 size looks like my S3 , can i sue apple ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you can but Apple will claim that Samsung used secret agents and mentalists to steal the secret plans from them before releasing the iPhone. :laugh:
Great. Now I can throw Iphone 5 whenever I get upset with it
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
It's about the design! Samsung did a mistake with the S3! As did apple with the iPhone 4 but you can see the new design dose not expose the glass so it will take more drops then the gs3
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
I don't see the point in doing drop tests on phones that make no claim to any IP standard, it proves nothing, especially with the totally unscientific methodology employed.....the bottom line from this point of view is that a larger sheet of glass will always be more vulnerable than a smaller one, simple physics.
it dosent take a genius to tell this... we all know s3 is prone to damage.. and again in reality the extent of damage always varies dpending on various factors
That pocket drop test is perfect for iPhone because the amount of moisturiser on male iPhone owners hands is gonna affect grip.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1883519
:banghead:
I got no problem with plastic but it should be durable. Like the one of the S2.
The S3 feels a bit more fragile, than the S2.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Phones are gonna shatter from a 1ft drop when they do end up making them frameless.
for a phone as thin and light as the iphone it did great tbh
i expected the s3 to do better
The test is not valid, because it's not a scientific experiment, they should be doing repeats, how do we know he didn't have a phone with a manufacturing defect causing the screen to break? My dog has knocked my GS3 off the window ledge before now onto a hard floor, and the screen is intact. All that video shows is HIS GS3 screen broke from the drop, then he did a second drop test with an already broken screen, which will further damage it.
Kind of useless test, just showing his phone can break, and confirming the laws of physics in further impacting already cracked glass will make the cracks worse.
delsus said:
The test is not valid, because it's not a scientific experiment, they should be doing repeats, how do we know he didn't have a phone with a manufacturing defect causing the screen to break? My dog has knocked my GS3 off the window ledge before now onto a hard floor, and the screen is intact. All that video shows is HIS GS3 screen broke from the drop, then he did a second drop test with an already broken screen, which will further damage it.
Kind of useless test, just showing his phone can break, and confirming the laws of physics in further impacting already cracked glass will make the cracks worse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah and the sheer size of the S3 means if you drop it on it's edge all that extra surface area means means it can easily flip round and land flat which is always the death nail for phone screens.
So for us the extra screen real estate is a huge positive and potential killer negative and none of these drops actually means the iPhone is better built.
I just like to watch iphones get smashed
EDIT: Well that was disappointing.
The guys at gizmoSlip have performed the quintessential drop test.
Not much problems in case of a back drop.
Screen shattered on the front drop.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yORiMT8DZoM
I guess it would be a good idea to buy a protective case after all!!
Sent from my Spice Mi-310 using XDA
Are people still surprised that dropping a pane of glass causes it to break, or do you think that Samsung is using magical glass that is not prone to breakage? Never really understood the utility of a drop test.
If the device is metal, it'll either dent or bend. If the device is plastic it will either survive unscathed or crack. If the impact is not directly on the glass, glass may or may not break depending on the force, angle, etc. If the impact is directly to the glass, it will break. There, I just described the drop test outcomes for every phone or tablet ever made.
It also depends on the design of the device itself. note II survived the drop test. So not all results are the same
Note II is also smaller and lighter, with less surface area. Still, it's a pretty safe bet that if you drop the device glass down onto a hard surface, it'll break. If it doesn't, you just got extremely lucky, but it's not because the Note 8 has stronger/weaker glass than ipad mini, note II, etc.
I agree, complete waste if money.
Its funny. Alot of Samsung mobile devices get marked down in reviews for their choice of materials used in their casings. This test shows that it is durable at least.
I dont think I know any iPhone users who havent cracked their screen at one point or another from even the smallest of drops and ones where the screen didnt even land face down. So much so that my younger brother seems to repair one from someone he knows every few months as a hobby (he is an engineering student at university and likes to tinker with things). I'm not particuarly anti Apple, but that always seems to be the bench mark which everything is judged
Interesting. I would not do that with my Note 8
case
Sun_Bean said:
Interesting. I would not do that with my Note 8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any recommend case ?
reliable and good case
melnikor said:
any recommend case ?
reliable and good case
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using this one:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00B4BEA82/ref=oh_details_o01_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
It's an excellent case for only $7. All corners are protected except for the one where the pen sits
I unfortunatly did my own drop test! I had it in my outside suit pocket, and my bag pushed it out and fell from about 3.5 ft face down onto a NYC sidewalk. Fortunatly all that happened is the raised fray border got scratched/dented! Not cracks or scratches to screen! Plastic held up very well, almost had a heart atrack.
That one had a loose nack by sd slot, but found out after drop the whole back can be popped off. Hopefully someone will make some cool eubber/aluminim backs!
Since I had a loose back.
/usb port and backlight bleed, I returned for a fresh one! I want that stand pouch but cant find it online! Anyone seen it? I think this may be the same.
http://www.expansys-usa.com/samsung-stand-pouch-for-samsung-galaxy-note-8-0-grey-248537/
Anyway...the plastic and note are very durable!
hertsjoatmon said:
Its funny. Alot of Samsung mobile devices get marked down in reviews for their choice of materials used in their casings. This test shows that it is durable at least.
I dont think I know any iPhone users who havent cracked their screen at one point or another from even the smallest of drops and ones where the screen didnt even land face down. So much so that my younger brother seems to repair one from someone he knows every few months as a hobby (he is an engineering student at university and likes to tinker with things). I'm not particuarly anti Apple, but that always seems to be the bench mark which everything is judged
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems all I ever see are cracked iphones now that I think about it
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 2
The front of every standard smartphone in the world is made out of glass. Glass has been known for being fragile for thousands of years. Anyone who claims that phone X is tougher than phone Y and tries to use that as an argument for or against a particular device is an idiot. I would say the same about people who buy devices just so they can make videos dropping them.
So Im still carrying my second one sans case..
Dropped TWO times yesterday, both about 4 ft off ground. Both times it lands face down, perfectly landing on the lip on the bezel(makes a real hefty noise). Barely a dent(tile and hard floor). I really think the glass is a hybrid with plastic, i didnt even get worried( this is 4 drop already)
Plastic=DURABLE
nymviper1126 said:
... i didnt even get worried( this is 4 drop already) ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow!!! You must have nerves of steel! That kind of thing would freak me out!
But good to know your Note 8 has been surviving just fine.
sputnik767 said:
The front of every standard smartphone in the world is made out of glass. Glass has been known for being fragile for thousands of years. Anyone who claims that phone X is tougher than phone Y and tries to use that as an argument for or against a particular device is an idiot. I would say the same about people who buy devices just so they can make videos dropping them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that if you drop any phone on its front then your likely to damage the screen as it is fragile. My arguement is that some phones are more fragile than others if you drop them on the side (iphone) as the way that the case is designed (although sturdy to hold) transfers alot of the force onto the screen rather than has any "give" to absorb some of the impact.
Who's paying for these worthless tests buying new devices and breaking them. Please send me the money instead we already know how to break phone screens
Sent from my GT-N5110 using Tapatalk 2
agambhandari said:
It also depends on the design of the device itself. note II survived the drop test. So not all results are the same
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o92mDzBTM14
Don't think so.
hurts my heart to see this
Just killed one, dropped right on corner to tile. LCD display went black with white bars.
nymviper1126 said:
Just killed one, dropped right on corner to tile. LCD display went black with white bars.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's awful! Very sorry for you. It can be so gut wrenching to lose a great (and expensive!) device in an instant like that.
http://youtu.be/aTpFTifoMks
Woza72 said:
http://youtu.be/aTpFTifoMks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd choose a Sony over that every single time!
Where is the glass part of the phone btw? This phone is just like all the others, while Sony has a back and front plate made out of glass.
that's one chunky
Dsteppa said:
I'd choose a Sony over that every single time!
Where is the glass part of the phone btw? This phone is just like all the others, while Sony has a back and front plate made out of glass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you watch the video with your eyes open?
One side of every mobile phone made, is glass, you know, so you can see through it to the information on the display! It would be quite problematic if they placed a plastic, rubber or metal casing over the phones actual lcd display as you would not be able to interact with its touch capabilities nor would you be able to see the screen!
My post is only talking purely about the glass.
I have a z3 compact and love it. However the glass is not resilient enough.
Imagine if on the iteration of the z4 Sony used this glass, front and back, then just increased the thickness of the nylon corners by 1-2mm so that when placed flat on a surface this was the only part that touched.
Close to perfection! Naked phone all day everyday ☺
That's one chunky and ugly phone! But at least I'd trust the glass more than I do the Z3c's
Funny thing is, many people's iPhones, Xperias, Galaxies etc. end up looking just as chunky and ugly when wrapped with big ol' cases for protection :laugh:
Woza72 said:
Did you watch the video with your eyes open?
One side of every mobile phone made, is glass, you know, so you can see through it to the information on the display! It would be quite problematic if they placed a plastic, rubber or metal casing over the phones actual lcd display as you would not be able to interact with its touch capabilities nor would you be able to see the screen!
My post is only talking purely about the glass.
I have a z3 compact and love it. However the glass is not resilient enough.
Imagine if on the iteration of the z4 Sony used this glass, front and back, then just increased the thickness of the nylon corners by 1-2mm so that when placed flat on a surface this was the only part that touched.
Close to perfection! Naked phone all day everyday ☺
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was 5am when I watched the video. Anyways... What I meant was, Sony has one front and rear glass body, while that phone has only the front part that's made out of glass, that's why I said that the phone is similar to other phones out there. The rear of the phone you linked takes most of the impact when the phone falls. Glass can take less hits (Sony front and rear)
In the end it doesn't matter if the phone is shatterproof/breakproof/waterproof. It's proof until a certain point.
It really doesn't matter if the/a phone is made out of diamonds, it will never be indestructible.
Sent from my C6603
Dsteppa said:
It was 5am when I watched the video. Anyways... What I meant was, Sony has one front and rear glass body, while that phone has only the front part that's made out of glass, that's why I said that the phone is similar to other phones out there. The rear of the phone you linked takes most of the impact when the phone falls. Glass can take less hits (Sony front and rear)
In the end it doesn't matter if the phone is shatterproof/breakproof/waterproof. It's proof until a certain point.
It really doesn't matter if the/a phone is made out of diamonds, it will never be indestructible.
Sent from my C6603
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sometimes I don't know why I bother, some people just look for the black clouds in everything!
Woza72 said:
Sometimes I don't know why I bother, some people just look for the black clouds in everything!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly! Hence the title of this topic. This is a Sony section, I don't see what you can/want to reach by posting such a video here.
Sent from my C6603
I
Dsteppa said:
Exactly! Hence the title of this topic. This is a Sony section, I don't see what you can/want to reach by posting such a video here.
Sent from my C6603
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG here come the clouds!
I actually get what you mean, and it would certainly be nice seeing something like that on a smartphone with 2 glass sides, but it would be really expensive. The off-contract price for Z3 Compact is already $500+, if both sides had a sapphire glass it would cost $700 or most likely more (especially since Sony does not produce their own sapphire glass). And the sapphire glass, while scratch-proof, can still break during certain impacts, as the video has shown. I'd rather see Sony use a better quality glass - not a sapphire but something which doesn't crack during normal usage, like some Z3C's currently do
This thread is pointless.
A Phone with sapphire front and backpanel, as thin as the Z3, would be way more prone to cracking. While sapphire is much more scratch resistant it's also more brittle. Harder = more brittle. So what exactly is the point of this thread?
A bulky phone with a rugged design and built in bumper is stronger than a thin phone without all these rugged reinforcements? Who could have expected that? :cyclops:
Thanks, exactly what I just wanted to say. And the fact that the phone is so bulky is one reason they can use sapphire glass at all.
Apple invested hundreds of millions of dollars in sapphire, and still the iPhone 6 doesn't use it. Guess why.
http://time.com/3377972/why-apple-didnt-use-sapphire-iphone-screens/
Iruwen said:
Thanks, exactly what I just wanted to say. And the fact that the phone is so bulky is one reason they can use sapphire glass at all.
Apple invested hundreds of millions of dollars in sapphire, and still the iPhone 6 doesn't use it. Guess why.
http://time.com/3377972/why-apple-didnt-use-sapphire-iphone-screens/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to bring some rays of bright, ambitious, product design ideas to the forum!
The whole idea of my thread was to highlight the possibility of better glass for Sony. I for one am not so concerned about shock/impact resilence as I have never been so clumsy as to drop a phone. However to have a screen that remains scratch free for its intended life span? Well I would pay an extra $50 for that! Additionally like I said, if they redesigned the phone frame/bumper most of the shock due to a drop would not transmit to the screen.
In closing, it's hilarious how those of you who posted negative , inflammatory comments on the pointlessness of this thread.
It was obviously meaningful enough for you to waste your petty time, energy and minds on!
What a waste of internet space this thread is.
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
When people think they're smarter than multi-billion dollar companies they either have a good reason or they didn't check the facts.
pipspeak said:
That's one chunky and ugly phone! But at least I'd trust the glass more than I do the Z3c's
Funny thing is, many people's iPhones, Xperias, Galaxies etc. end up looking just as chunky and ugly when wrapped with big ol' cases for protection :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh some refreshing, intelligent and insightful comments.
Thankyou for your time and thoughts ☺
AlexusJ said:
I actually get what you mean, and it would certainly be nice seeing something like that on a smartphone with 2 glass sides, but it would be really expensive. The off-contract price for Z3 Compact is already $500+, if both sides had a sapphire glass it would cost $700 or most likely more (especially since Sony does not produce their own sapphire glass). And the sapphire glass, while scratch-proof, can still break during certain impacts, as the video has shown. I'd rather see Sony use a better quality glass - not a sapphire but something which doesn't crack during normal usage, like some Z3C's currently do
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh another bright light, who reads a post, understand it's intend purpose and respectfully identified both sides of their opinion.
Good day to you sir ☺
Any type of Sapphire screen would have made the Z3 thicker. Additionally it would have required a total redesign to compensate for the sapphire brittleness.
So again, what is your point? A mistery phone from Sony designed around a sapphire screen? Then this thread should go in the general Sony section.
OP's too butthurt to listen to actual arguments I'm afraid.
Useless thread is useless.
Thread closed.
God i wish a mass group of us can write an email to Corning and let them know how distasteful it is to show videos of drops doing NO damage to show how tough Gorilla Glass 4 is. The glass will crack if it lands on any of the corners of the phone and will need to be replaced. Here is a drop video of a naked S6, it's cued to take you straight to the action. Notice that last drop, completely renders the display unusable
Naked S6 drop test
EDIT: Here is the Corning video of their in-house drop test and how they make it seem tough enough to withstand drops without a case:
Corning GG4 lab tests
I am not saying it's supposed to be break proof but I saw this Corning glass video last month and really thought the S6 screens would be much tougher, not completely invincible of course.
Why email Corning??? They didn't make Samsung put it on both front and back of the phone. And yes its still glass so its going to be able to he broke. There is no way that they can make glass break proof on a phone.
chillsen said:
God i wish a mass group of us can write an email to Corning and let them know how distasteful it is to show videos of drops doing NO damage to show how tough Gorilla Glass 4 is. The glass will crack if it lands on any of the corners of the phone and will need to be replaced. Here is a drop video of a naked S6, it's cued to take you straight to the action. Notice that last drop, completely renders the display unusable
Naked S6 drop test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Their whole marketing is that it's STRONGER than regular glass, not unbreakable.
I doubt anyone on a forum of this caliber thought that because Corning put their name and "tech" on glass it's going to stop acting like glass.
Glass is glass. Glass is fragile. Glass often breaks on impact.
There's nothing interesting, surprising, or scandalous here.
As far as I know Corning has never made the claim that Gorilla Glass is unbreakable, only that it's super scratch resistant. This thread is dumb.
Poetique said:
I doubt anyone on a forum of this caliber thought that because Corning put their name and "tech" on glass it's going to stop acting like glass.
Glass is glass. Glass is fragile. Glass often breaks on impact.
There's nothing interesting, surprising, or scandalous here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you're giving XDA just a little too much credit with that 1st statement. Just saying But really anyone who thinks the glass on this phone is impervious to cracking needs to lower their expectations. While being much more reinforced it's definetely prone to cracking. Which is why I have a slim clear case on mine. I had an iPhone 4 and having a device with a crack on the rear stinks.
NJGSII said:
I think you're giving XDA just a little too much credit with that 1st statement. Just saying But really anyone who thinks the glass on this phone is impervious to cracking needs to lower their expectations. While being much more reinforced it's definetely prone to cracking. Which is why I have a slim clear case on mine. I had an iPhone 4 and having a device with a crack on the rear stinks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might be right there. Though to be fair, back when I first started posting/lurking here, it would have been a pretty accurate statement lol. Mind you, this was actually my second XDA account
chillsen said:
God i wish a mass group of us can write an email to Corning and let them know how distasteful it is to show videos of drops doing NO damage to show how tough Gorilla Glass 4 is. The glass will crack if it lands on any of the corners of the phone and will need to be replaced. Here is a drop video of a naked S6, it's cued to take you straight to the action. Notice that last drop, completely renders the display unusable
Naked S6 drop test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For any droptest to hold real merit they should have used an undamaged S6 for each individual drop. An already cracked screen being dropped on it's face breaks the entire screen? Wow, I did not expect that...
chillsen said:
God i wish a mass group of us can write an email to Corning and let them know how distasteful it is to show videos of drops doing NO damage to show how tough Gorilla Glass 4 is. The glass will crack if it lands on any of the corners of the phone and will need to be replaced. Here is a drop video of a naked S6, it's cued to take you straight to the action. Notice that last drop, completely renders the display unusable
Naked S6 drop test
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You seem surprised that glass breaks?
Gorilla Glass 4, New name, Butterfly Glass.
le_lutin said:
You seem surprised that glass breaks?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No i'm shocked the way they made it seem how touch GG4 is with the lab tests: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ObyPq-OmO0
I've seen other drop tests not sponsored by case/accessory manufacturers that show a much hardier device. The S6 edge has been dropped <6' without any glass damage in all the other drop tests I've seen.
chillsen said:
No i'm shocked the way they made it seem how touch GG4 is with the lab tests: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ObyPq-OmO0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you want to see some videos of it surviving drops, is that it?
Knock yourself out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpsyGweP5so
Keep in mind the following: glass is not unbreakable.
le_lutin said:
So you want to see some videos of it surviving drops, is that it?
Knock yourself out:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpsyGweP5so
Keep in mind the following: glass is not unbreakable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you're completely creating an incorrect assumption of my main point which is their marketing made gg4 look much more stronger to drops than in real life videos and its misleading. your cheap, sarcastic quips don't do much for me
chillsen said:
you're completely creating an incorrect assumption of my main point which is their marketing made gg4 look much more stronger to drops than in real life videos and its misleading. your cheap, sarcastic quips don't do much for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But what is it that you want to see happen? A petition? What's the end-game here for you?
le_lutin said:
But what is it that you want to see happen? A petition? What's the end-game here for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
acknowledgement to the masses of Corning's marketing being misleading, to make it seem that it is impervious to cracks when dropped. to not let others believe the hype due to Corning's marketing
chillsen said:
acknowledgement to the masses of Corning's marketing being misleading
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Acknowledgement by Corning? If that's your end-game, I would give up right now as you'll be wasting your time and energy.
chillsen said:
to make it seem that it is impervious to cracks when dropped
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The video, that you, yourself linked to, specifically says:
- "Glass performance depends on device design, drop height and landing surface"
- "Our new formulation survives real-world drops on rough surfaces up to twice as often as competitive glass designs when dropped from one metre"
- (under the demonstrated test mechanism)"Withstands breakage 80% of the time".
Now how, specifically, in that video, do you feel you have been misled by any of the claims made?
Also keep in mind that Corning is not responsible for how any given manufacturer's design uses their glass.
Poetique said:
You might be right there. Though to be fair, back when I first started posting/lurking here, it would have been a pretty accurate statement lol. Mind you, this was actually my second XDA account
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I first came here when I had my S2 I would had agreed lol.
NJGSII said:
I think you're giving XDA just a little too much credit with that 1st statement. Just saying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's about a half dozen threads saying that this phone is secretly waterproof because some asshat tossed it in a bowl of water and it didn't die until the water leaked in. Remember, the masses are asses, and there's no limit to how stupid people can be.
chillsen said:
Corning GG4 lab tests
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that video, pretty cool watching their testing equipment. Shame about the rest of your post being pointless and annoyingly full of paranoia.
Hah.. ParANOIA. Lame but still has more entertainment value than your post.
entropism said:
There's about a half dozen threads saying that this phone is secretly waterproof because some asshat tossed it in a bowl of water and it didn't die until the water leaked in. Remember, the masses are asses, and there's no limit to how stupid people can be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I saw that video. My thoughts were this: Yeah my car is crash proof until it crashes. At which time it can be fixed and then it is crash proof again.
Exactly the same theory to that video.. He puts it in water and soon enough it dies because of the water, then he takes it out and dries it off and soon enough it works again.
I've watched about 3-4 Scratch/Drop tests since the Note 20 Ultra released and everyone has been pretty bad so far. Micro Scratches galore and major screen breakage. Looks like the new Gorilla Glass isn't all its cracked up to be. Its actually pretty disappointing.
If someone is going to carry this phone around without any protection: May God have mercy on your soul.
thedarkness37 said:
If someone is going to carry this phone around without any protection: May God have mercy on your soul.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not, I got a case before mine even arrived. I'm just saying for how much they touted this new glass its not living up to the hype.
It's glass... Glass does what glass will do....
Not sure what you watched but the one I saw dropped 10 times from about 5-6 feet on the front without a single break. Small breakage on the back from a back drop.
This drop test video seems to disagree with you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6OcmT18R-I
Link575 said:
Not sure what you watched but the one I saw dropped 10 times from about 5-6 feet on the front without a single break. Small breakage on the back from a back drop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I watched these:
Corning says the phone will survive a 2 meter drop. That is 6 feet. These phones are starting to crack at 3 feet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rp9Ehqb_dGo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLWOlVqvigU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6OcmT18R-I
howie411 said:
I watched these:
Corning says the phone will survive a 2 meter drop. That is 6 feet. These phones are starting to crack at 3 feet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to consider when corning says that they are talking about a flat piece of glass....now when samsung curves it and probably makes it thinner than the testing glass it goes back to the same durability as previous GG6 phones....I'm waiting to see some durability tests on the regular flat screen note20 but seems no one is (understandably) buying those.
These "tests" are no very realistic.
Imagine if a car magazine bought a new Ferrari and decided to test it by driving 100 mph down railroad tracks or in a corn field!
Want a realistic test especially for a woman? Put the phone in a big purse fall of crap they typically have, place in a paint can shaker for 1 hour. That would simulate a week's worth of wear?!
The majority of users have a case. Even a thin one increases survivability of drops enormously. Except cases with little "raisivity", the rim over the edge, on direct drops to macadam parking lots and such.
howie411 said:
I've watched about 3-4 Scratch/Drop tests since the Note 20 Ultra released and everyone has been pretty bad so far. Micro Scratches galore and major screen breakage. Looks like the new Gorilla Glass isn't all its cracked up to be. Its actually pretty disappointing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont trust a 1300 purchase to hype. They are never gonna drop a glass solution that will make me okay with leaving my phone completely naked.
---------- Post added at 10:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 PM ----------
seczdbz said:
You have to consider when corning says that they are talking about a flat piece of glass....now when samsung curves it and probably makes it thinner than the testing glass it goes back to the same durability as previous GG6 phones....I'm waiting to see some durability tests on the regular flat screen note20 but seems no one is (understandably) buying those.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find it hard to believe they don't test the glass ON the device.
pcriz said:
I dont trust a 1300 purchase to hype. They are never gonna drop a glass solution that will make me okay with leaving my phone completely naked.
---------- Post added at 10:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 PM ----------
I find it hard to believe they don't test the glass ON the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was talking about corning themselves. When they are testing/showing the strength of the new glass it is a just a flat piece of glass.
seczdbz said:
I was talking about corning themselves. When they are testing/showing the strength of the new glass it is a just a flat piece of glass.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm talking about Corning as well. They have a partnership with Samsung and a few others. They manufacture the glass for Samsung. I still find it a reach to think they are testing a flat piece of glass in a vacuum and not in the shape of the final product attached to at least a dummy device that represents the final product.
This is my opinion but I'm curious if you have a source on such a definite statement of how they test their product.
pcriz said:
I'm talking about Corning as well. They have a partnership with Samsung and a few others. They manufacture the glass for Samsung. I still find it a reach to think they are testing a flat piece of glass in a vacuum and not in the shape of the final product attached to at least a dummy device that represents the final product.
This is my opinion but I'm curious if you have a source on such a definite statement of how they test their product.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same concept of how samsung makes display panels for so many other phones but once that other phone maker gets the samsung panel they calibrate it to their own specs...I can't post any links yet but if you just search gorilla glass victus on YouTube there are videos showing them testing the glass...the dummy phone they test has a flat display and some other tests are just a piece of flat glass itself.
seczdbz said:
It's the same concept of how samsung makes display panels for so many other phones but once that other phone maker gets the samsung panel they calibrate it to their own specs...I can't post any links yet but if you just search gorilla glass victus on YouTube there are videos showing them testing the glass...the dummy phone they test has a flat display and some other tests are just a piece of flat glass itself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Umm okay. A display panel that produces different results based on the driver's attached to it is not at all an analogy for a single piece of glass.
Also the videos you are talking about are for an iteration of their glass. They are advertising a product that could be used by anyone willing to pay for it. The fact that their promo videos for it show flat panels is only proof that most devices people imagine will be flat.
Samsung doesn't make gorilla glass. Every glass panel Corning makes for various customers is made in Harrodsburg Kentucky. They hold patents for their glass, you mean that is handed over to the individual OEMs to do with it what they will?
I'll just agree to disagree. Samsung doesn't get a recipe for the glass and just does what they want. And if corning is cutting corners between flat panels and curved just to make numbers that's neither here nor their for the consumer. Samsung is a large advertising medium for them, so delivering a subpar version of the glass to one of it's biggest avenues for getting it's name out there would be kind of silly.
I guess I don't get your point, is Samsung taking a good product and making it worse? Is this a defense of corning?
In my eye glass is glass, even the Jerry Rig video shows it's marginally more durable at best compared to GG6 last year's model.
It's all hype and marketing.
pcriz said:
Umm okay. A display panel that produces different results based on the driver's attached to it is not at all an analogy for a single piece of glass.
Also the videos you are talking about are for an iteration of their glass. They are advertising a product that could be used by anyone willing to pay for it. The fact that their promo videos for it show flat panels is only proof that most devices people imagine will be flat.
Samsung doesn't make gorilla glass. Every glass panel Corning makes for various customers is made in Harrodsburg Kentucky. They hold patents for their glass, you mean that is handed over to the individual OEMs to do with it what they will?
I'll just agree to disagree. Samsung doesn't get a recipe for the glass and just does what they want. And if corning is cutting corners between flat panels and curved just to make numbers that's neither here nor their for the consumer. Samsung is a large advertising medium for them, so delivering a subpar version of the glass to one of it's biggest avenues for getting it's name out there would be kind of silly.
I guess I don't get your point, is Samsung taking a good product and making it worse? Is this a defense of corning?
In my eye glass is glass, even the Jerry Rig video shows it's marginally more durable at best compared to GG6 last year's model.
It's all hype and marketing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you that in the end its all just hype and marketing. It's glass and it will still break and scratch.
thedarkness37 said:
If someone is going to carry this phone around without any protection: May God have mercy on your soul.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just put a skin on the back, that's it. I cannot stand cases. I like to feel the glass n metal of the phone. No some £10 plastic case. Yuk.
pcriz said:
I dont trust a 1300 purchase to hype. They are never gonna drop a glass solution that will make me okay with leaving my phone completely naked.
---------- Post added at 10:28 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:26 PM ----------
I find it hard to believe they don't test the glass ON the device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Corning is not going to grab every different type of phone whose manufacturer purchased their glass and perform some sort of drop test. They make their sheet if glass and run it through its paces. After it's been altered to suit OEM needs, it's up to that party to come up with their own claims.
chetly968 said:
Corning is not going to grab every different type of phone whose manufacturer purchased their glass and perform some sort of drop test. They make their sheet if glass and run it through its paces. After it's been altered to suit OEM needs, it's up to that party to come up with their own claims.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't they say would. They will test the panels. Probably do batch tests because they make so many. They make the glass. Of course they are testing the glass. I didn't say they were individually putting each panel they produce into a phone to check but to assume they don't do form fit checks would be strange.
They make every panel of glass in house. The claims of durability are theirs. Cornings.
Just want to leave my actual experience with the phone, on my last 7 days of use since I got it.
I'm using it with a slim TPU case, bare screen. Extra careful handling, no mixing with objects in the pocket, no accidents whatsoever.
After 5-6 days of use, I can already see some light marks/scratches, specially across the top border of the screen.
They are not visible most of the time, but they appear once you hit it with light on a certain angle, and they annoy me as hell.
As some other user told me here on XDA, it's likely due to microparticles living on my pocket, that end up creating this "misterious" scratches at some point.
This is specially relevant on this N20 Ultra, because of its huge size and its difficulty fitting on any pocket whatsoever.
And this has happened to me with my last 5-6 Galaxy phones (S20+, Note10+, S10+, etc), with their so-called "Gorilla" glasses.
So no it's not scratch resistant, certainly not a bit more than most of the previous generations. Not sure about crack resistance though, but I'd rather not test that myself.
rodrigofd said:
So no it's not scratch resistant, certainly not a bit more than most of the previous generations. Not sure about crack resistance though, but I'd rather not test that myself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've always liked to point out that a lot of their focus is on shatter resistance. And unless they managed to magically change the laws of physics, the easiest way to avoid shattering glass is to make it "softer" this means the hardness is lowered so its less brittle. Problem is, thinking of it simply based on hardness and softness, softer glass scratches. Its why products like whitestone are so brittle, their hardness is higher.
Its not the worse trade off but like you said. Scratches are annoying.
Personally I ignore anything about gorilla glass. Unless they put a warranty against it, I'm gonna take measures to protect my investment.