Database Users

AnTutu Benchmark

I know some of you think benchmarks are wack but I use them from time to time to see if im gaining any better performance from different roms and kernels. Used to use Quadrant all the time but a friend told me about AnTutu on the market. Don't know if any of you have used it, but its free and im kind digging it over Quadrant. Try it out if you haven't. Here are some screen shots.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Trigger + Tigersblood = Winning

Thanks will check it out.
Here's a link for anyone wanting to try it out.

Just tried it out. Got a score in the low 1500s. Seems pretty good, although it's kind of depressing not seeing my phone at the top of the list like it always was in Quadrant

Thanks for the heads up

dpaul007 said:
Just tried it out. Got a score in the low 1500s. Seems pretty good, although it's kind of depressing not seeing my phone at the top of the list like it always was in Quadrant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol yeah im used to seeing my score at the top too. This bench gives out some useful info tho. More than the free version of quadrant. Don't know if I wanna pay 24 bucks for the pro version of quadrant to see how that is. Sure its a lot better than the free version. Im going to stick with this for a bit until I find something better.
Trigger + Tigersblood = Winning

quadrant pro is bull does nothing but give "detailed" stats which means the same thing this does for free, the bar thing is colored and it gives GPU CPU etc.
After saying all that, i should admit...
I have Quadrant Advanced...
I'll check this out in a sec. thanks for sharing!

I ran this benchmark a couple weeks ago and scored 2081.
I re-ran the benchmark after the recent update, and I just scored 3254 total, which ranks me 30th in the world. Wow!
Stock Motorola Atrix 4G 2.2.1 FroYo

Sid 6.7 said:
I ran this benchmark a couple weeks ago and scored 2081.
I re-ran the benchmark after the recent update, and I just scored 3254 total, which ranks me 30th in the world. Wow!
Stock Motorola Atrix 4G 2.2.1 FroYo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*****of the world of people who have actually ever used the app lol****

Warchief337 said:
*****of the world of people who have actually ever used the app lol****
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good one lmao

Quadrant Benchmark for Galaxy Note - 4308 (and probably higher)

Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.

the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.

Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave

I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....

foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?

rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?

Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!

Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??

i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D

Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri

RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000

How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3

I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri

MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000

It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri

roms and benchmarks

I would have posted in the trinity kernel but im still new and learning and cant do that yet. After reading about the little dust-up in the trinity kernel thread Ive really started to question benchmark testing software for android. As I understand quadrent is just the most common bench marker but many people seem to not like it. While I enjoy getting high scores Id rather have a "true" benchmark of my performance on my tablet. Does anybody have any suggestions for a better benchmark software or at least one you can't :cheat" at. Also on a unrelated note I see the different roms available however it appears people seem to act like CM10 or AOKP are real special compared to other roms. As I have no history with tablets or android before getting my Nexus is their a reason why these roms are treated with such reverence by some? Thanx alot guys

joemegahertz said:
I would have posted in the trinity kernel but im still new and learning and cant do that yet. After reading about the little dust-up in the trinity kernel thread Ive really started to question benchmark testing software for android. As I understand quadrent is just the most common bench marker but many people seem to not like it. While I enjoy getting high scores Id rather have a "true" benchmark of my performance on my tablet. Does anybody have any suggestions for a better benchmark software or at least one you can't :cheat" at. Also on a unrelated note I see the different roms available however it appears people seem to act like CM10 or AOKP are real special compared to other roms. As I have no history with tablets or android before getting my Nexus is their a reason why these roms are treated with such reverence by some? Thanx alot guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
first off, I'm using plain old pure asop as my ROM.. simple, clean, and fast. and for benchmarking, you should use many different benchmarks, none of them singlely test for everything. some are graphics oriented, some cpu oriented, some browser oriented, and some read/write oriented. here's a screenshot of the benchmarks that I use. and yes, even quadrant can be useful if you watch the individual scores(we watch the mem and CPU scores in quadrant BTW). oh BTW, any benchmark can be cheated. but what's the point, you're only lying to yourself.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Thanx for the quick reply! I agree completely about lying to yourself I just hate seeing incredible scores and not knowing if they cheated and me racking my brain trying to figure out why my scores aren't that good lol. Going to have to try out those other apps. Also not sure if you work with morfic or just a big supporter but thank you for the kernel, excellent battery life and power when I need it.

Evaluating ANTUTU 5, impressions so far.

I was selected to test out an Alpha version of ANTUTU 5, here are my impressions so far. It is markedly longer than previously. There are new CPU tests, including Single Thread Integer, Single Thread Floating Point, refined 2D tests, which are now performed in landscape, and an all new 3D test Project Anarchy, which is a Forrest Scene. Pretty Cool. Cant wait for the final project.

stevessvt said:
I was selected to test out an Alpha version of ANTUTU 5, here are my impressions so far. It is markedly longer than previously. There are new CPU tests, including Single Thread Integer, Single Thread Floating Point, refined 2D tests, which are now performed in landscape, and an all new 3D test Project Anarchy, which is a Forrest Scene. Pretty Cool. Cant wait for the final project.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am testing it too and I've noticed something but I am not sure if it's related to Antutu. When it goes to CPU Interger Test or Float point test, all cores go to 100% usage except for CORE1. For some reason, it stays at 1-10%. Maybe it's the kernel. I am using ElementalX

andreasyeah said:
I am testing it too and I've noticed something but I am not sure if it's related to Antutu. When it goes to CPU Interger Test or Float point test, all cores go to 100% usage except for CORE1. For some reason, it stays at 1-10%. Maybe it's the kernel. I am using ElementalX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will check it out if I can, I am stock unrooted. How can I check for you?

stevessvt said:
I will check it out if I can, I am stock unrooted. How can I check for you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you can't. I am using InsertCoin Rom to check CPU Usage. Thanks anyway!

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2809307
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

i just downloaded and gave a shot but it is restarted my device around 34%
M8 viperone 1.8.0 @ 2.5ghz via elementalx 0.19

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
SD redbull v2

Nice,...stock? My best so far was 43341, stock unrooted. My first run resulted in a F/C, but everything since has been good.

stevessvt said:
Nice,...stock? My best so far was 43341, stock unrooted. My first run resulted in a F/C, but everything since has been good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea how you guys are getting a such a high score, im stock rooted but only can get around 41500 and that's only after updated the gpu drivers

Is This the Highest Benchmark Score the Note 3 Will Get?

I want to preface this with the fact that I have run several roms over the course of my time spent in rooting and flashing. Out of all of the roms, CM12.1 is the most stable and currently runs the fastest. I'm wondering if the Note 7 or S7/S7E ports will be able to handle overclocking because every time I have tried, the device will reboot. If I can't get these types of roms to be stable and fast, I won't be able to test them with Antutu benchmark. That said, I'm wondering if there is anyone who has a higher score than this. If so, what rom did you use and how stable is it?
I should note that I am currently using these specs:
-ROM: CM12.1
-Kernel: IdleKernel
-Screen Size: 2560 X 1440 (My phone seems to handle this incredibly well, though I can't quite get it up to 4K without having problems.)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

The Killing Joke said:
If I can't get these types of roms to be stable and fast, I won't be able to test them with Antutu benchmark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, this joke is really killing me...

Dejan Sathanas said:
Yeah, this joke is really killing me...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The questions were posed because I want to know if anyone has had better luck than I did. I'm merely curious as to what the limits are of this type of phone.

The Killing Joke said:
The questions were posed because I want to know if anyone has had better luck than I did. I'm merely curious as to what the limits are of this type of phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This score means nothing if you do not specify used cpu governor, hotplug driver, i/o scheduler and o.c value.
With an S7E port (default settings, no optimizations and no OC), i can get +62K and a 3D score higher than yours.

zlazaar said:
This score means nothing if you do not specify used cpu governor, hotplug driver, i/o scheduler and o.c value.
With an S7E port (default settings, no optimizations and no OC), i can get +62K and a 3D score higher than yours.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As expected, most N7/S7E ports will have a higher 3D value than CM. The govenor I used was interactive. Overclocked to 2.76 ghz, gpu was also overclocked to 450 mhz. I chose not to mess with the i/o scheduler. Hotplugging was turned off.

The Killing Joke said:
As expected, most N7/S7E ports will have a higher 3D value than CM. The govenor I used was interactive. Overclocked to 2.76 ghz, gpu was also overclocked to 450 mhz. I chose not to mess with the i/o scheduler. Hotplugging was turned off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if you are satisfied with your rom so keep it.
Anyway, in raw speed Touchwiz can't compete with CM/AOSP.
A little tip for higher score : use Fiops schedular with read ahead buffer = 256kb