Related
i have had an evo since the day it came out, and about a month and a half ago i dropped it on the ground. the screen shattered, and i didn't have insurance. at the time the sprint guy said it wasn't a big deal, because the cost for repair was about the same either way. i paid about $130 and it was fixed half an hour later.
lately, about a month and a half later, i noticed some weird issues with the touchscreen. it was jumping around as if i had my finger on it when i wasn't touching it. i formatted the sdcard, did a factory reset, wiped everything, and loaded a stock rooted rom on it. it was fine for a couple hours, then i noticed the issues again. random scrolling, opening apps when i wasnt touching the screen, etc. i noticed the Y and G keys are now not working. i downloaded a screen test app that records where you have touched the screen with a white line. while sliding my finger up and down all across the screen, there is a noticeable band running vertically across the general area of the Y and G keys that does not record any touch activity even if i slide my finger there.
i took the phone to a sprint store and showed them. they asked if i had insurance and i said no. they said "well you could get insurance and then have it repaired for $35." i asked "why should i have to pay to have something repaired that i didn't break? the replacement screen is obviously defective." the guy said "well you should have insurance." and i again said "why do i need insurance for something that went bad on its own?" and he said "you had the repair done over 30 days ago so you'll have to pay to have it repaired again."
i have no idea why i should have to pay for repairs for a phone, regardless if i have insurance or not, when i didn't do anything to damage the phone. im going to go to the actual repair store here in chicago, but i doubt theyll say anything different. if they can't repair it for free, im seriously considering switching to a different phone company. this ridiculous service/repair policy along with the horrible battery life (the guy actually asked how my battery life was and tried to sell me an extended battery, and also tried to sell me a case... neither of which i care about), ridiculous $10/month fee, and lack of built-in tethering makes me want to switch back to tmobile which was a great company when i had the G1.
does anyone have any tips they can give me to get this fixed for free? or is that a hopeless idea?
thanks.
When you had the repair done, I'm sure there was a warranty period on the repair itself. Do you have any documentation showing what that timeframe is? It seems to me that if the screen repair warranty is up, you may be stuck paying for the new repair. Have you tried calling sprint with *2 and explaining the situation? I went through a similar situation with the screen developing a large white spot. It took many calls to *2 until somebody was willing to work with me. Try that. If you are not getting the answers you want, hang up and call right back. My persistence worked out eventually, but like I said, it was a time-consuming ordeal. Good luck.
i understand that there was a warranty associated with the last repair, but it still doesn't make any sense to me that a problem i am having with the screen has nothing to do with anything i did. the shattered screen is not the problem (the screen did not get shattered again, which was what the original repair was for). the touchscreen is simply not working properly. am i supposed to get insurance, pay for that each month, and then pay $35 now and again every 45 days if the problem continues? doesn't make much sense to me, but that seems to be how sprint operates. i will take your advice and call *2 after i get turned away at the actual repair facility that i'm on my way to now. thanks for your advice.
Go to another store and show them the problem but do not mention anything about the screen being replaced before, unless they noted your account. Hopefully they could replace it/fix it under warranty
Welcome to Sprint's "screw the customer" routine. Ive dealt with similar issues in the past.
Like others have said, the repair they did should have a warranty to it, just like if you go to get your car fixed, it usually has a 90 day warranty on the fix itself. Go back to where they fixed it, and talk to the manager. Explain your situation, that the repair obviously was faulty.
If that doesnt work, call *2, and ask to speak to account services. Explain your situation to them, how you are not at fault here, and shouldnt be treated this way as a valued customer. Tell them you will cancel your service if they dont help you resolve this issue. When you tell them that, they will bend over backwards to keep you, and hopefully send you a repacement phone.
I would say your best bet is calling *2 several times and trying to get a person who will help. Usually if you bounce around enough you may get lucky. Although, I have noticed that over the last 6 months they have really tightened down and become less willing to make exceptions. But these situations is what the insurance is for. If your phone was defective in the first 30 days, Sprint would repair it or replace it for free regardless of insurance, after that it's on the customer if you don't have insurance, regardless of the issue. If you had insurance right now you could get it replaced free with no deducible. I had a similar problem with my original EVO that I had since launch day last month. The touchscreen would just start clicking in the middle of the screen all on it's down. I have the insurance, so they replaced it with no questions asked. Your situation is sort of like a laptop, they only come with a certain warranty, and then if it breaks after that it's on you to fix it unless you have extra insurance or an extended warranty regardless of why it malfunctioned. I'm not a big fan of extra insurance either, but on a phone it is really worth it. Also, I am pretty sure ALL phone companies have the same sort of policy when it comes to fixing phones, so I doubt going to a different carrier would help you any. If your phone breaks without insurance through any provider after 30 days its coming out of your wallet. I would say, you might as well get the insurance and pay the $35 to get it fixed. That sounds like a good deal to me, because last night I broke the glass on my second evo, and with insurance the deductible to replace the phone is $100... so $35 sounds like a deal to me. If you don't want to do that, the only other option I see is going on eBay and buying a new screen/digitizer for $49 and putting it in yourself.
wmblalock said:
I would say your best bet is calling *2 several times and trying to get a person who will help. Usually if you bounce around enough you may get lucky. Although, I have noticed that over the last 6 months they have really tightened down and become less willing to make exceptions. But these situations is what the insurance is for. If your phone was defective in the first 30 days, Sprint would repair it or replace it for free regardless of insurance, after that it's on the customer if you don't have insurance, regardless of the issue. If you had insurance right now you could get it replaced free with no deducible. I had a similar problem with my original EVO that I had since launch day last month. The touchscreen would just start clicking in the middle of the screen all on it's down. I have the insurance, so they replaced it with no questions asked. Your situation is sort of like a laptop, they only come with a certain warranty, and then if it breaks after that it's on you to fix it unless you have extra insurance or an extended warranty regardless of why it malfunctioned. I'm not a big fan of extra insurance either, but on a phone it is really worth it. Also, I am pretty sure ALL phone companies have the same sort of policy when it comes to fixing phones, so I doubt going to a different carrier would help you any. If your phone breaks without insurance through any provider after 30 days its coming out of your wallet. I would say, you might as well get the insurance and pay the $35 to get it fixed. That sounds like a good deal to me, because last night I broke the glass on my second evo, and with insurance the deductible to replace the phone is $100... so $35 sounds like a deal to me. If you don't want to do that, the only other option I see is going on eBay and buying a new screen/digitizer for $49 and putting it in yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Under the new Sprint policy revealed here on XDA, isn't a non-TEP screen replacement, or anything else, $35 per job?
Update:
I went to a Sprint repair store (can't go to the original one because I moved across the country). They took the phone to the back room and came out five minutes later. The guy said "the tech said to get that touch screen test app off your phone because it isn't a good representation of what's wrong" ... I said "okay, well that section of the screen is clearly not accepting touch input" and he said to call a 1800 number to do a factory reset (?!) so I left and called that number and it was disconnected. haha.
I called *2, went through a bunch of menus, and it told me to call some 1800 number from a different phone. I got some guy who walked me through a factory reset which of course did not work. He said he would connect me to tech support, who I thought I was already talking to. Told her the problem and that the reset didn't work. She said it was a hardware problem and I said yes, and said I know it isn't her fault but that I didn't think it was fair for me to pay for a defective screen. She said she was making some notes in my account and was going to transfer me to an escalation manager. That person listened to my complaint again which I tried to word in a polite way. I didn't threaten to cancel my account but was ready to say something. I told her I would like to have a replacement phone since this one seems to have issues. She asked if it had been replaced before, I said no. She asked for my mailing address and email and put me on hold for about five to ten minutes. During that time, I got an email outlining my exchange order.
The exchange order notes that I could have to pay $75 to $125 for the replacement as well as some other fees, but she never mentioned anything about me paying at all so I'm prepared to call up and complain again if they try to charge me. I mean, I realize that's a policy but they never mentioned fees on the phone. I mean, i might as well have paid the $35 if I didn't mind fees.
Another thing to note is that when the guy at the store came out of the back room he had the battery cover off my phone and said the sensor showed it had gotten wet. I have never gotten it wet, and he said it was my fault if I kept it in my pocket. I will call and complain again if they charge me for returning a wet phone, because its not my fault if its such a poor design that minor sweat or pocket humidity can make it malfunction! I don't mean to nitpick but come on HTC...
one thing i HATE about calling any tech company getting shifted around to this person then to this person etc etc
wrb123 said:
i have had an evo since the day it came out, and about a month and a half ago i dropped it on the ground. the screen shattered, and i didn't have insurance. at the time the sprint guy said it wasn't a big deal, because the cost for repair was about the same either way. i paid about $130 and it was fixed half an hour later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you ask them what kind of warranty they provided with the repair?
No, I didn't (and still don't) think it mattered. If I break something, like I did, I expect to pay for it or have insurance cover it. Since I didn't have insurance, I was okay with paying. While I don't expect a repair to last forever, I think it is reasonable to expect the phone be repaired to like-new condition or with a new screen. Then, if I use the phone normally, with or without insurance, I expect the phone to function normally for at least the length of the contract.
Expectations and reality are two different things. Why don't you call the store and ask them how long they warranty their repairs and go from there.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I don't know what this guy is talking about! First with how much this phone cost why wouldn't you have insurance on it! It only equals 85 bucks for the year way less then the price of a new or used phone even with the 100 you have to pay to get a replacement your still making out good! I jumped in the pool with my phone and even though it still worked I got a replacement for a 100 no hassles! And my screen went hay wire on the replacement and when they couldn't repair it I got another one for free! I dropped my phone and damage the front facing camera took it to the Sprint store and got it fixed for free! So stop being cheap and get insurance
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
I am already getting a replacement phone for free, without insurance, if you read the entire thread.
As far as "being cheap" and "just getting insurance" you are citing two incidents where you caused damage to your phone. I agree that you or I should be expected to have insurance to cover damage to our phones that we cause. I am talking about a screen defect (I didn't drop my phone a second time and crack the screen a second time - the screen stopped accepting touch input in a huge area). people should expect more from electronics manufacturers and the phone companies that essentially work with them by accepting and promoting new phones. Electronics used to last, even when they had moving parts. Now we have a generation of people who are fine with devices that frequently go bad and having insurance to cover it. It seems to me Sprint and HTC are the cheap ones, pumping out thousands of the next "iphone killer" with poor batteries, screens, usb ports, etc.
The "issue" you are having with Sprint is that they no longer cover in warranty repairs at no cost. The phone comes with a 1yr warranty thru HTC. If you would like free in warranty repairs call HTC. Good luck with that one by the way. Normally you are responsible for shipping the device to the manufacture and you would be obviously without your phone for the duration of the repair. The manufacture usually inspects the phone much more closely as well. When I worked at another carrier we used to receive photos of corrosion internally of equipment that they determined was not repairable. Even though the external indicators showed no such damage.
If you have TEP $7/month you would receive replacement equipment for in warranty repairs if it can not be repaired by an in store technician. TEP covers all manufacture warranty and non-warranty items in house. If it is board level damage, water damage, lost stolen, or broken beyond repair it will be replaced by asurion for the $100 deductible.
Any warrantied item without insurance will cost $35 for sprint provided repairs. Exception being software updates. If the phone is out of warranty all repairs, software updates, etc will cost $35.
The incident when my phone went on the fritz and was doing the same screen things yours was I got a replacement free of charge!
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
My "issue" is also that sprint was providing in warranty repairs for one year when I bought this phone. Now they're trying to change that and then saying "oh just get insurance because its a good idea and would cover this." No. I'm getting a free replacement which is what I deserve. There is another thread that explains this change in policy.
bnick007 said:
The "issue" you are having with Sprint is that they no longer cover in warranty repairs at no cost. The phone comes with a 1yr warranty thru HTC. If you would like free in warranty repairs call HTC. Good luck with that one by the way. Normally you are responsible for shipping the device to the manufacture and you would be obviously without your phone for the duration of the repair. The manufacture usually inspects the phone much more closely as well. When I worked at another carrier we used to receive photos of corrosion internally of equipment that they determined was not repairable. Even though the external indicators showed no such damage.
If you have TEP $7/month you would receive replacement equipment for in warranty repairs if it can not be repaired by an in store technician. TEP covers all manufacture warranty and non-warranty items in house. If it is board level damage, water damage, lost stolen, or broken beyond repair it will be replaced by asurion for the $100 deductible.
Any warrantied item without insurance will cost $35 for sprint provided repairs. Exception being software updates. If the phone is out of warranty all repairs, software updates, etc will cost $35.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a good explanation of what changed. It actually used to be like this way back in the day wth Nextel before the merger - you could get a warranty replacement for free, or you could pay $35 for the convenience of walking into the store and picking it up the same day. I'm not sure when it changed to free warranty repairs but you have to pay more for out of warranty repairs (first it was $35 or $55, depending on what's wrong, then later $99 for dumbphones and $119 for smartphones), but now it's essentially back to how it was to begin with.
Overall, It's probably a better value, and you're probably still better off without insurance. Think about it this way - suppose you keep a phone for 2 years, and it breaks once a year - once under warranty and once out of warranty. With the new plan, that's a total cost of $70 ($35 + $35). With the old plan, the first repair would be covered and the second wouldn't. so that'd be $119. Now obviously, that's a hypothetical, you probably don't need to get it repaired that often. but personally, I find that I generally don't need any repairs until I've owned it for a year or so anyway. So it's better for my purposes, although others might disagree.
Regarding TEP - in the long run you're not saving money unless your phone is lost or stolen, and even then you're out $100 for the deductible. Suppose you're phone is stolen once in the same hypothetical 2 yr period (since after 2 yrs you could get a discounted upgrade): You'll save $449.99 on a new phone at MSRP, but you will have paid $268 in premiums and the deductible. If your phone isn't stolen / water damaged / completely destroyed, you're out $168. I don't know about you, but in the last 11 yrs that I've owned cell phones, I've never had that happen - I've needed repairs, but have never been in a situation when I'd need to place an insurance claim. And the $35 you'll save on a repair with tep is only 5 months' premium - surely nobody needs a repair every 5 months!
The bottom line is that all insurance is a losing proposition in the long run - if it weren't likely that you'd pay more in premiums than you get in claims, insurance companies wouldn't make any money. Personally, i only insure those things that I absolutely can't afford to replace out of pocket - my car, house, health life, etc.
Anyhow, sorry to go on like that, but it's just a topic that's been bouncing around in my head recently.
(and a bit of fair disclosure, I'm a Sprint Nextel employee, but what I write here is purely my personal opinion)
Raheem387 said:
The incident when my phone went on the fritz and was doing the same screen things yours was I got a replacement free of charge!
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good deal
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Good luck, I have to wonder though if the fight, frustration and possible disappointment is really worth it.
I was looking to purchase a Samsung Galaxy SII i9100 (U.K. version) but I know that Samsung won't honor the warranty since its a not a U.S. phone.
I was reading some old threads on this about how for $94 Squaretrade will insure your phone for $600 for two years but some people said they would cover it and some said they wouldn't...
Then I got this directly from Squaretrade's website:
"Coverage Details
2 years of coverage: The SquareTrade Smartphone warranty covers your Smartphone for up to 2 years, starting on the date of purchase.
Covered Issues: Both accidents (e.g., broken screen or other damage through drops AND liquid damage including full immersion) and out-of-warranty normal use failures (e.g., battery no longer charging or other hardware failures) are covered. We do not cover loss, theft, willful damage or damage occurring through gross misuse."
This scared the hell out of me, I've never used Squaretrade before. Lets say something goes wrong and I contact them for support... wouldn't they just say "sorry we only cover out-of-warranty repairs you need to go to Samsung U.K. since you have a 1st year warranty through them" ???
Kind of a big purchase (over $600) so I need to be sure that I am covered before pulling the trigger
Also does anyone know the general cost of shipping a galaxy s i9100 from the U.S. to the U.K. for samsung to repair it?
Thanks for you help I really appreciate it.
P.S. in case anyone says to search I already looked through both of the U.S. warranty threads and didn't find an answer
If you a buy a phone in its country of intended sale from an authorized Samsung dealer it's covered by Samsung's two-year global warranty. So if you buy it in the UK and have it shipped to the U.S. it'll be covered as you'll have a receipt from the UK in GBP. Expansys-USA also sends phones they sell in the U.S. back to the UK for repair through their office there. Now that the phone's being sold in the U.S. there's a good chance you could get a UK phone under warranty repaired here. Samsung's very strict and requires a receipt and/or a credit card statement before they repair a phone under warranty. They also have a DB of serial numbers that show which phones were sent to which resellers. Their warranty system is hard to scam.
SquareTrade does cover gray market phones. This is from their T&C:
If the manufacturer refuses to honor their warranty because they consider your item grey market or not purchased from an authorized retailer, we will still cover you.
And yes, assuming you get your phone from the UK or from Expansys-USA, SquareTrade only covers what the manufacturer doesn't. But if you crack the screen or cause damage to the phone that Samsung woudn't cover it's still good to have SquareTrade as a back-up.
Owning a gray market phone is a pain in the ass if something goes wrong. If it has to be repaired in the UK you'll be without for a couple of weeks. If you want the safety and security of carrier insurance and swaps for defects stick with an American version.
BarryH_GEG said:
If you a buy a phone in its country of intended sale from an authorized Samsung dealer it's covered by Samsung's two-year global warranty.
Expansys-USA also sends phones they sell in the U.S. back to the UK for repair through their office there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So if I purchase through Expansys-USA that means I still have the 2 year (or is it 1 year since it was bought from a Expansys branch in the States?) warranty and if anything goes wrong I send it to their U.S. branch which then forwards it to their U.K. branch to get repaired?
Is there any sort of warranty f.a.q. on Expansys website that says this in writing that I can print out? I looked on their website and found nothing detailing this U.S. to U.K. forwarding process and don't wan't to have something go wrong and then later on an Expansys-USA rep that doesn't know much telling me "Ooooh no sir, we don't do that... you have to go through Samsung U.K. yourself to get repairs"
BarryH_GEG said:
Owning a gray market phone is a pain in the ass if something goes wrong. If it has to be repaired in the UK you'll be without for a couple of weeks. If you want the safety and security of carrier insurance and swaps for defects stick with an American version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gezz why the heck does Samsung make it so hard for Americans? You'd think they would want to make it easier for potential customers to buy their products that make them money instead of blacklisting the product from warranty and turning sales away
ap3604 said:
So if I purchase through Expansys-USA that means I still have the 2 year (or is it 1 year since it was bought from a Expansys branch in the States?) warranty and if anything goes wrong I send it to their U.S. branch which then forwards it to their U.K. branch to get repaired?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In essence, Expansys is your warranty. I'm guessing they act as middle-man for the life of the Samsung warranty which, internationally, is two years. You really need to check with them.
Is there any sort of warranty f.a.q. on Expansys website that says this in writing that I can print out? I looked on their website and found nothing detailing this U.S. to U.K. forwarding process and don't wan't to have something go wrong and then later on an Expansys-USA rep that doesn't know much telling me "Ooooh no sir, we don't do that... you have to go through Samsung U.K. yourself to get repairs"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
E-mail their sales group and ask them to send you an e-mail confirming their policy. If you want to buy the phone in the UK, Handtec, Clove, and CleverBoxes all ship to the U.S.
Gezz why the heck does Samsung make it so hard for Americans? You'd think they would want to make it easier for potential customers to buy their products that make them money instead of blacklisting the product from warranty and turning sales away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The U.S. carriers are their bread and butter. They'd rather funnel all their sales through them rather than compete by selling unlocked phones direct.
Easy...
ap3604 said:
I was looking to purchase a Samsung Galaxy SII i9100 (U.K. version) but I know that Samsung won't honor the warranty since its a not a U.S. phone.
I was reading some old threads on this about how for $94 Squaretrade will insure your phone for $600 for two years but some people said they would cover it and some said they wouldn't...
Then I got this directly from Squaretrade's website:
"Coverage Details
2 years of coverage: The SquareTrade Smartphone warranty covers your Smartphone for up to 2 years, starting on the date of purchase.
Covered Issues: Both accidents (e.g., broken screen or other damage through drops AND liquid damage including full immersion) and out-of-warranty normal use failures (e.g., battery no longer charging or other hardware failures) are covered. We do not cover loss, theft, willful damage or damage occurring through gross misuse."
This scared the hell out of me, I've never used Squaretrade before. Lets say something goes wrong and I contact them for support... wouldn't they just say "sorry we only cover out-of-warranty repairs you need to go to Samsung U.K. since you have a 1st year warranty through them" ???
Kind of a big purchase (over $600) so I need to be sure that I am covered before pulling the trigger
Also does anyone know the general cost of shipping a galaxy s i9100 from the U.S. to the U.K. for samsung to repair it?
Thanks for you help I really appreciate it.
P.S. in case anyone says to search I already looked through both of the U.S. warranty threads and didn't find an answer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simple, throw it into the toiled before claiming the insurance.
It fell out of my hands face flat onto a concrete floor - I tried to catch it mid fall and ending up flicking it further away, around 4-5ft drop with quite a bit of force in the end.
NO DAMAGE at all!!
This phone is not as fragile as people are making out on xda.
Just thought I would let people know as all I see on here is 'it smashed/cracked by itself' 'i didn't drop it far etc etc
Perhaps I am just lucky, either way front and back glass are still perfectly fine.
This might help people who are still on the fence to buy it or not.
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
Yeah I've had my phone fall a few times onto wooden floors, once into the crevices of my car seat, tossed on my bed etc; phone is still mint. No case or screen protector.
Sent from my D5803
pricey2009 said:
It fell out of my hands face flat onto a concrete floor - I tried to catch it mid fall and ending up flicking it further away, around 4-5ft drop with quite a bit of force in the end.
NO DAMAGE at all!!
........
This might help people who are still on the fence to buy it or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well maybe you should change the title lol. Now people will think this is yet another thread about a Z3C that has fallen to pieces.
I've dropped mine after 1h from taking out of the box... from the microwave to to counter and to tiles floor, i lost few years of my life, but the phone was absolutely immaculate, not wearing any protection at all
Robin>Hood said:
Well maybe you should change the title lol. Now people will think this is yet another thread about a Z3C that has fallen to pieces.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't you think that makes it more likely to be read though? Lol
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
You could change the title to something like "Post about your drops with no damage!"
every drop is different.
if you are lucky it survives a 2m drop.
if you are unlucky it cracks from 50cm
pricey2009 said:
It fell out of my hands face flat onto a concrete floor - I tried to catch it mid fall and ending up flicking it further away, around 4-5ft drop with quite a bit of force in the end.
NO DAMAGE at all!!
This phone is not as fragile as people are making out on xda.
Just thought I would let people know as all I see on here is 'it smashed/cracked by itself' 'i didn't drop it far etc etc
Perhaps I am just lucky, either way front and back glass are still perfectly fine.
This might help people who are still on the fence to buy it or not.
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@pricey2009
Hey Pricey
Tbh I think you're massively lucky... but please add your experience to the survey, so that it's as representative as possible.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/z3-compact/general/sony-xperia-z3-z3-compact-glass-survey-t2900149
Regards,
Gary
gazzawazza said:
@pricey2009
Hey Pricey
Tbh I think you're massively lucky... but please add your experience to the survey, so that it's as representative as possible.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/z3-compact/general/sony-xperia-z3-z3-compact-glass-survey-t2900149
Regards,
Gary
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All done
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
Sounds like a defective unit to me - ask Sony to replace for one that cracks properly :good:
To the OP.. What week is your phone was manufactured?
Sent from my C2104 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Sparksys said:
To the OP.. What week is your phone was manufactured?
Sent from my C2104 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
W39
Sent from my D5803 using XDA Free mobile app
you must be lucky - I dropped mine 2 days after getting it and it landed on a corner of a glass scale and entire back screen was in bits.... I still have a chipmark on the bezel at the back (tiny but still) but luckily I managed to get the back glass replaced by my insurance. What I'm worried about now is how it affects the water resistance but hopefully they would have done a decent job and put the back screen in properly...
Dropped mine today after a week of use. Was in my shirt pocket and fell on the concrete floor as I was bending down. There was no case on it. Only screen protectors. I was really nervous to check for any damage after reading through the plethora of negative reviews regarding cracks. To my surprise the phone did not suffer from any damage whatsoever. Was quite relieved. My case (Ringke fusion) is still on the way. Hope it arrives soon.
I placed my order from Sony's USA site this past Friday. I had the option to also purchase the 2 year warranty from Sony for an extra $79.99. I am very, very careful with my devices, so I normally don't purchase the extra protection. But this will be my first all glass phone, so I'm wondering if I should shell out the extra $80.
Weird thing is that Sony's website states that I have up until 365 days after my purchase to get the 2 yr warranty. So, does that mean I can wait until my phone breaks to get the warranty? How exactly does this work?
Issemann said:
I placed my order from Sony's USA site this past Friday. I had the option to also purchase the 2 year warranty from Sony for an extra $79.99. I am very, very careful with my devices, so I normally don't purchase the extra protection. But this will be my first all glass phone, so I'm wondering if I should shell out the extra $80.
Weird thing is that Sony's website states that I have up until 365 days after my purchase to get the 2 yr warranty. So, does that mean I can wait until my phone breaks to get the warranty? How exactly does this work?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry that no-one replied Issemann.
Personally, the 2 year 'cover' sounds ok. It does significantly increase the cost of the phone though, surely?
Just make sure you've read what the warranty covers. If this is literally just an extended period (but otherwise standard) warranty, you're not covered for stuff like accidental damage / self-inflicted stuff.
I thought I'm careful with products but accidents can happen. Also, the phone is made of glass (predominantly i.e. both front and back are glass) and it's slippy in a way that I've not encountered with other phones (not that I've had many). You really must get a case for it.
Regarding your comment about phone breaking and then getting warranty. Technically, if the incident occurred and you weren't covered by the warranty, then you're not covered (I'd have thought - it's like taking out insurance after an accident occurred). But who's to know? Tbh, if you take out the warranty, then make a claim on it days / weeks later, it'll just look suspicious
You could just say you were blessed by foresight and took out the warranty at the right time
Everything I've said though is speculation, in that I've not looked at the cover you're talking about. However, I stand by that you need cover in place to be covered!
Anyway, this is an extract from the latest published Z3 compact warranty, language is UK (am taking this to imply it's the UK warranty ). The warranty listed here is two years, so either yours would be an extended cover or an extended period of warranty (I'd imagine). Finally, I say it's the z3 compact warranty, as this is the pdf produced when I browsed to the z3 compact and downloaded the warranty doc:
"Our warranty
Subject to the conditions of this Limited Warranty, Sony warrants this Product to be free
from defects in design, material and workmanship at the time of its original purchase by a
consumer. This Limited Warranty will last for a period of two (2) years as from the original
date of purchase of the Product for your mobile device, and for a period of one (1) year
following the original purchase date of the Product for all original accessories (such as the
battery, charger or handsfree kit) which may be delivered with your device.
What we will do
If, during the warranty period, this Product fails to operate under normal use and service, due
to defects in design, materials or workmanship, Sony authorised distributors or service
partners, in the country/region* where you purchased the Product, will, at their option, either
repair, replace or refund the purchase price of the Product in accordance with the terms and
conditions stipulated herein.
Sony and its service partners reserve the right to charge a handling fee if a returned Product
is found not to be under warranty according to the conditions below.
Please note that some of your personal settings, downloads and other information may be
lost when your Sony Product is repaired or replaced. At present, Sony may be prevented by
applicable law, other regulation or technical restrictions from making a backup copy of
certain downloads. Sony does not take any responsibility for any lost information of any kind
and will not reimburse you for any such loss. You should always make backup copies of all
the information stored on your Sony Product such as downloads, calendar and contacts
before handing in your Sony Product for repair or replacement."
"This warranty does not cover any failure of the Product that is due to:
• Normal wear and tear.
• Use in environments where relevant IP rating limitations, if applicable, are exceeded
(including liquid damage or the detection of liquid inside the device resulting from such
use).
• Misuse or failure to use in accordance with the Sony instructions for use and
maintenance of the Product.
Nor does this warranty cover any failure of the Product due to accident, software or
hardware modification or adjustment, or acts of God."
Source: http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/common/warranty_phones_GB_24_2.pdf
Basically, under the standard warranty, you have to prove that there is a defect to avoid having to pay a repair bill.
Regards,
Gary
gazzawazza said:
sorry that no-one replied Issemann.
Personally, the 2 year 'cover' sounds ok. It does significantly increase the cost of the phone though, surely?
Just make sure you've read what the warranty covers. If this is literally just an extended period (but otherwise standard) warranty, you're not covered for stuff like accidental damage / self-inflicted stuff.
I thought I'm careful with products but accidents can happen. Also, the phone is made of glass (predominantly i.e. both front and back are glass) and it's slippy in a way that I've not encountered with other phones (not that I've had many). You really must get a case for it.
Regarding your comment about phone breaking and then getting warranty. Technically, if the incident occurred and you weren't covered by the warranty, then you're not covered (I'd have thought - it's like taking out insurance after an accident occurred). But who's to know? Tbh, if you take out the warranty, then make a claim on it days / weeks later, it'll just look suspicious
You could just say you were blessed by foresight and took out the warranty at the right time
Everything I've said though is speculation, in that I've not looked at the cover you're talking about. However, I stand by that you need cover in place to be covered!
Anyway, this is an extract from the latest published Z3 compact warranty, language is UK (am taking this to imply it's the UK warranty ). The warranty listed here is two years, so either yours would be an extended cover or an extended period of warranty (I'd imagine). Finally, I say it's the z3 compact warranty, as this is the pdf produced when I browsed to the z3 compact and downloaded the warranty doc:
"Our warranty
Subject to the conditions of this Limited Warranty, Sony warrants this Product to be free
from defects in design, material and workmanship at the time of its original purchase by a
consumer. This Limited Warranty will last for a period of two (2) years as from the original
date of purchase of the Product for your mobile device, and for a period of one (1) year
following the original purchase date of the Product for all original accessories (such as the
battery, charger or handsfree kit) which may be delivered with your device.
What we will do
If, during the warranty period, this Product fails to operate under normal use and service, due
to defects in design, materials or workmanship, Sony authorised distributors or service
partners, in the country/region* where you purchased the Product, will, at their option, either
repair, replace or refund the purchase price of the Product in accordance with the terms and
conditions stipulated herein.
Sony and its service partners reserve the right to charge a handling fee if a returned Product
is found not to be under warranty according to the conditions below.
Please note that some of your personal settings, downloads and other information may be
lost when your Sony Product is repaired or replaced. At present, Sony may be prevented by
applicable law, other regulation or technical restrictions from making a backup copy of
certain downloads. Sony does not take any responsibility for any lost information of any kind
and will not reimburse you for any such loss. You should always make backup copies of all
the information stored on your Sony Product such as downloads, calendar and contacts
before handing in your Sony Product for repair or replacement."
"This warranty does not cover any failure of the Product that is due to:
• Normal wear and tear.
• Use in environments where relevant IP rating limitations, if applicable, are exceeded
(including liquid damage or the detection of liquid inside the device resulting from such
use).
• Misuse or failure to use in accordance with the Sony instructions for use and
maintenance of the Product.
Nor does this warranty cover any failure of the Product due to accident, software or
hardware modification or adjustment, or acts of God."
Source: http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/common/warranty_phones_GB_24_2.pdf
Basically, under the standard warranty, you have to prove that there is a defect to avoid having to pay a repair bill.
Regards,
Gary
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what you are referring to is the original manufacturer warranty...Sony provides an additional warranty option for $80. It is for 2 years and covers accidents in addition to defects (still covered under original warranty). It does not cover theft/loss. From what i read, they will repair it or replace the device 1 time during that period. If you send it for repairs the coverage continues, if they decide to replace it, the warranty becomes void. A good bargain for $80, breaks down to $3.33 a month with no deductible. Better than carrier insurance.
jdiddy_ub said:
what you are referring to is the original manufacturer warranty...Sony provides an additional warranty option for $80. It is for 2 years and covers accidents in addition to defects. It does not cover theft/loss. From what i read, they will repair/replace the device 1 time during that period. Once you use it, it becomes void. Still a good bargain for $80, breaks down to $3.33 a month with no deductible. Better than carrier insurance. The only "catch" is the theft/loss and only 1 claim allowed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi @jdiddy_ub
I know I was referring to the standard / original warranty - I wanted to be certain that what @Issemann was talking about was different / additional / beneficial
Very good point that $3.33 a month is good, although it being a single shot isn't so good.
I'm investigating whether I can get a similar deal over in the UK. Unfortunately I didn't buy directly from Sony, so might not have this extension, if available at all, available to me.
I bought via my carrier - O2 - on an upgrade. They offer insurance but you have to take it within 28 days of purchase (and I'm outside that now).
There are price bands for the insurance. I don' t know which the z3 compact falls in but I will bet it won't be the cheapest one
However, you get accidental damage and accidental theft cover. You can also get accidental damage cover only.
I've skimmed the T&Cs and cover is upto £300. Am assuming this is per claim. Couldn't find any cap on numbers of claims you can make.
Assuming you have similar insurance packages via your carriers, it might be effectively not much more expensive to get insurance and have the 'more than one use' option?
Alternatively, take out the accidental damage warranty and look at 3rd party insurance, if that warranty gets 'used'.
Just be careful about insurance T&Cs (I know you read them but others might not be so vigilant). I've just, out of curiosity, checked out a UK insurer called gadget cover. Their monthly cover for the z3 compact is basically £7 p/m. You can pay annually too. Interesting 'penalties' though.
Excess will be £50 or £75 for z3 compact (damage / theft or loss, respectively), with an additional £25 on top, if claiming within first 3 months of cover.
Additionally, if you pay monthly, you have to pay the balance of the 12 month premium before any claim can be made (effectively increases the 'excess' hugely, if you make an early claim).
So you could effectively have to pay out £177 for a lost phone, including your initial payment, assuming the insurer honours the claim, if you claimed in the first month. Ouch.
I guess cheaper than buying a new phone though.
I do appreciate I've been rather UK-centric, but I just wanted to flag this kind of detail of UK users and to warn non-UK users of possible pitfalls with insurance (assuming mobile device insurers have similar policies - I'm fairly confident they would, particularly regarding mobile phone cover).
Regards,
Gary
gazzawazza said:
Hi @jdiddy_ub
I know I was referring to the standard / original warranty - I wanted to be certain that what @Issemann was talking about was different / additional / beneficial
Very good point that $3.33 a month is good, although it being a single shot isn't so good.
I'm investigating whether I can get a similar deal over in the UK. Unfortunately I didn't buy directly from Sony, so might not have this extension, if available at all, available to me.
I bought via my carrier - O2 - on an upgrade. They offer insurance but you have to take it within 28 days of purchase (and I'm outside that now).
There are price bands for the insurance. I don' t know which the z3 compact falls in but I will bet it won't be the cheapest one
However, you get accidental damage and accidental theft cover. You can also get accidental damage cover only.
I've skimmed the T&Cs and cover is upto £300. Am assuming this is per claim. Couldn't find any cap on numbers of claims you can make.
Assuming you have similar insurance packages via your carriers, it might be effectively not much more expensive to get insurance and have the 'more than one use' option?
Alternatively, take out the accidental damage warranty and look at 3rd party insurance, if that warranty gets 'used'.
Just be careful about insurance T&Cs (I know you read them but others might not be so vigilant). I've just, out of curiosity, checked out a UK insurer called gadget cover. Their monthly cover for the z3 compact is basically £7 p/m. You can pay annually too. Interesting 'penalties' though.
Excess will be £50 or £75 for z3 compact (damage / theft or loss, respectively), with an additional £25 on top, if claiming within first 3 months of cover.
Additionally, if you pay monthly, you have to pay the balance of the 12 month premium before any claim can be made (effectively increases the 'excess' hugely, if you make an early claim).
So you could effectively have to pay out £177 for a lost phone, including your initial payment, assuming the insurer honours the claim, if you claimed in the first month. Ouch.
I guess cheaper than buying a new phone though.
I do appreciate I've been rather UK-centric, but I just wanted to flag this kind of detail of UK users and to warn non-UK users of possible pitfalls with insurance (assuming mobile device insurers have similar policies - I'm fairly confident they would, particularly regarding mobile phone cover).
Regards,
Gary
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I edited my original post after re-reading the terms. The "one-shot" only applies to replacement. You can get the device repaired and continue to have coverage until the 2 years expires. I have been comparing the Sony $80 warranty vs. 3rd party companies and i still think that Sony comes out on top. The major difference is theft/loss coverage. If you are someone that has the tendency to lose things or have lost your phone in the past, then the Sony coverage won't cover you.
If we are talking about accident coverage, Sony comes out way on top if you talk about pricing. Take a 3rd party insurer for lets say $5/mo and add a $75 deductible to it...on month #3 you would be paying $90 and if you dropped it on say month #20 it comes out to $175..more than double Sony's price.
Also, Sony is a major brand whereas 3rd party insurance (based on google reviews-i've never had it) sounds like a 50-50 crap shoot, 1. to find a reputable company 2. turnaround times, and what they cover/don't cover...some reviews state they had to provide like 10 different proofs of purchase and the company tries to find a loophole out of it.
In my opinion, if you're lucky enough to be able to purchase the Sony warranty, that is the best deal.
jdiddy_ub said:
I edited my original post after re-reading the terms. The "one-shot" only applies to replacement. You can get the device repaired and continue to have coverage until the 2 years expires. I have been comparing the Sony $80 warranty vs. 3rd party companies and i still think that Sony comes out on top. The major difference is theft/loss coverage. If you are someone that has the tendency to lose things or have lost your phone in the past, then the Sony coverage won't cover you.
If we are talking about accident coverage, Sony comes out way on top if you talk about pricing. Take a 3rd party insurer for lets say $5/mo and add a $75 deductible to it...on month #3 you would be paying $90 and if you dropped it on say month #20 it comes out to $175..more than double Sony's price.
Also, Sony is a major brand whereas 3rd party insurance (based on google reviews-i've never had it) sounds like a 50-50 crap shoot, 1. to find a reputable company 2. turnaround times, and what they cover/don't cover...some reviews state they had to provide like 10 different proofs of purchase and the company tries to find a loophole out of it.
In my opinion, if you're lucky enough to be able to purchase the Sony warranty, that is the best deal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep... sounds like the best deal tbh.
I can't find any option regarding warranties on the Sony Mobile website
Have had a look in the Sony online store, tried accessories, etc, to no avail.
Suspect it must get offered after you've made a direct purchase?
Did have a quick browse via my carrier too but couldn't find anything pertinent.
Regards,
Gary
I have a 2014 Moto X, 16 GB with the bamboo back, on Verizon. The back is peeling off, and I've just finished speaking with Motorola.
I didn't buy the device - it was traded. Despite the fact that I have the box, the IMEI, and everything except the original order information, they refuse to help me. If I had the order info, I'd be well on my way to a new one, but without it, they're happy to leave me completely swinging by myself.
So if you're thinking about buying one used, or giving one as a gift... I wouldn't recommend it. They don't care, and couldn't be bothered to try and find a solution. Last motorola product I'll ever buy.
Not exactly Motorola's fault.
In what way? Tell me of another company that doesn't honor their warranty if you gift a device. It's not like I don't have the serial number, IMEI, and every other bit of info for the thing. Every other company on the planet uses serial numbers for warranties. It shouldn't matter who owns the device or if they kept their receipt. This isn't a pair of headphones from Best Buy, here.
Not only that, but it's a 2014. It can only be so old. It's not like this might somehow be out of warranty.
most if not all items for electronics.... from my past experience that the warranty is only for the original purchaser, its usually in the warranty policy, I buy and sell a lot of used phones, and I know that`s the chance I take of buying used.
below is from moto website
MOTOROLA MOBILITY INC.
LIMITED GLOBAL WARRANTY
MOBILE PHONES
FOR CONSUMERS WHO ARE COVERED BY CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS OR
REGULATIONS IN THEIR COUNTRY OF PURCHASE OR, IF DIFFERENT, THEIR COUNTRY OF
RESIDENCE, THE BENEFITS CONFERRED BY THIS LIMITED WARRANTY ARE IN ADDITION
TO ALL RIGHTS AND REMEDIES CONVEYED BY SUCH CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS
AND REGULATIONS.
Who is Covered?
This Limited Warranty extends only to the first consumer purchaser of the Product, and is not transferable.
It sucks, but I have never owned an electronic device where the warranty extends to the second hand market
You say it is the last Motorola phone you will ever buy, perhaps a wiser choice would be to make this the last second hand phone you ever buy.
...
Can you not glue the back?
At the minimum you could send it in and they can reglue it or replace the back cover. It will cost you but it's better than nothing. You might be able to negotiate a deal.
You never get warranty coverage without proof of purchase, it's basically Warranty 101. My advice would be to contact the original seller and ask them if they can do a warranty return for you.
I have never heard of a company that warrants an item with no proof of purchase. Even with proof of purchase, the warranty on most consumer goods is not transferable.
Factory warranties on cars is the only case I can think of where they don't care about proof of purchase (because they already know when it was purchased).
One thing to keep in mind is that sometimes your experience will vary from rep to rep.
And also your attitude going into it is important as well.
I have a friend that gets no help ANYWHERE, and it's because of the manner in which he speaks. He's not outright rude, but he's a bit socially inept, so he comes off very abrasive. You can hear kindness. People like to help nice people.
dg4prez said:
In what way? Tell me of another company that doesn't honor their warranty if you gift a device. It's not like I don't have the serial number, IMEI, and every other bit of info for the thing. Every other company on the planet uses serial numbers for warranties. It shouldn't matter who owns the device or if they kept their receipt. This isn't a pair of headphones from Best Buy, here.
Not only that, but it's a 2014. It can only be so old. It's not like this might somehow be out of warranty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The micro USB port on my black 16gb X broke. I took it to my local brick & mortar Verizon store and they ordered a replacement device, no questions asked. They never asked to see any paperwork.
It sounds like you've got nothing to loose by trying the same thing?
dg4prez said:
I didn't buy the device - it was traded. Despite the fact that I have the box, the IMEI, and everything except the original order information, they refuse to help me. If I had the order info, I'd be well on my way to a new one, but without it, they're happy to leave me completely swinging by myself.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ask the seller for the info. I think it's good Motorola doesn't accept warranty without this information because thiefs will not have this info, only people who honestly bought it...
(btw it's very stupid for a company to not honor warranty, within the normal warranty period, for owners after the first owner because this severly impacts resell price and thus selling price)
You are correct.
Apple don't need proof of purchase for warranty, they have their own database based on IMEI/SN.
So if you purchase iPhone from Craigslist and it is still under warranty, Apple will still honor the warranty.
No Android OEM has this kind of customer service, not HTC/Motorola/Samsung/Google as far as I know.
I have read reports from some folks who successfully applied a small amount of glue under the peeled up wood, might be worth a try
dg4prez said:
I didn't buy the device - it was traded.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Um. This is standard operating procedure for most companies.
sxp123731 said:
You are correct.
Apple don't need proof of purchase for warranty, they have their own database based on IMEI/SN.
So if you purchase iPhone from Craigslist and it is still under warranty, Apple will still honor the warranty.
No Android OEM has this kind of customer service, not HTC/Motorola/Samsung/Google as far as I know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Nexus S that I bought used off eBay needed a screen replacement, and Samsung did so - no questions asked. Great experience. I haven't had to deal with an OEM for warranty since.
PhilDX said:
I have read reports from some folks who successfully applied a small amount of glue under the peeled up wood, might be worth a try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can either remove the whole back and re glue it or just use a very fine felt brush to apply glue to the edge of wood. Worked for me. Sent mine back because a different corner peeled. @dg4prez
Fix it your self, It does suck they wont honor a product under warranty.
I know a lot of companies who follow this rule but there are many companies who don't.
I always try and buy product from companies who have exceptional customer service and warranties, its worth it, even if you pay a little more.
I bought a Moto X for a friend of mine, my card, my email, my delivery address. He broke his screen a week later, he called them up and they asked him to send it in, charged him $120 for a new screen and sent him back a new phone, he never needes the order number or anything.
Last week i tore the leather on my moto x, called motorola, they asked for order number, email, address, charged me $25 and sent me a new phone and i will be sending back the one that has the torn back.
Guess it depends on who you speak with.
Also, as was mentioned earlier Apple warranties extend to any owner of the phone, since their proof of purchase comes up when the IMEI/SN is entered (you can even check warranty status on their website)
Only company that got close to this is samsung, i used to work in a cellphone shop and wed brick ALOT of phones testing things out, including note 3, s5 etc and samsung out always unbrick them for free even though we were not the original buyers.
2003vstrom said:
most if not all items for electronics.... from my past experience that the warranty is only for the original purchaser, its usually in the warranty policy, I buy and sell a lot of used phones, and I know that`s the chance I take of buying used.
below is from moto website
MOTOROLA MOBILITY INC.
LIMITED GLOBAL WARRANTY
MOBILE PHONES
FOR CONSUMERS WHO ARE COVERED BY CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS OR
REGULATIONS IN THEIR COUNTRY OF PURCHASE OR, IF DIFFERENT, THEIR COUNTRY OF
RESIDENCE, THE BENEFITS CONFERRED BY THIS LIMITED WARRANTY ARE IN ADDITION
TO ALL RIGHTS AND REMEDIES CONVEYED BY SUCH CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS
AND REGULATIONS.
Who is Covered?
This Limited Warranty extends only to the first consumer purchaser of the Product, and is not transferable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That rule definitely would't survive here in Europe. No matter either written or not. It's against consumer protection regulations. And what is even more weird is that the provision is in direct conflict with freedom of contract principle. Neither state nor any third party could interfere with the contract without clear legal basis. Warranty refers to the sold good not to the person who bought it.
dg4prez said:
In what way? Tell me of another company that doesn't honor their warranty if you gift a device. It's not like I don't have the serial number, IMEI, and every other bit of info for the thing. Every other company on the planet uses serial numbers for warranties. It shouldn't matter who owns the device or if they kept their receipt. This isn't a pair of headphones from Best Buy, here.
Not only that, but it's a 2014. It can only be so old. It's not like this might somehow be out of warranty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Companies warranty to the original purchaser except if it is a gift. Did you register the device with them or did the original purchaser?
My Verizon 10 has formed a yellow band on the right side of the screen. I would like to send it in for repair, but I bought the phone second hand and am not using it on the verizon network.
1) Would Verizon accept my warranty claim without a receipt or VZW account?
2) Would HTC repair it under warranty as if I bought it from them?
3) if the answer to 2) is no, would HTC repair it at a cost, and does anyone know how much a screen replacement costs?
Getting in touch with the original owner is not possible either. Any help would be appreciated!
Update: Just finished speaking with htc, they will accept my warranty claim directly! Hope they don't surprise me with a cost quote now!
Verizon won't do anything for you. The only way they would is if you are the original purchaser, in which case they will replace the device if it's within the manufacturer's 1 year warranty. HTC *might* do something for you, but I'm not too knowledgeable on their warranty policy. There's a good chance they will restrict warranty service to the original purchaser, or tell you that since it's a Verizon phone, you'll have to go through them. HTC does offer a one-time "uh-oh" protection, but that's limited to people who purchased their phone through HTC.com.
You can try it yourself, the digitizer runs around $70 on eBay, but it isn't a simple repair. Otherwise, most screen repair services charge in the $150-$200 range.
Here's the HTC warranty information. It looks like you'll want to have the phone 100% stock with locked bootloader and s-on. http://dl4.htc.com/Web_materials/Ma...evA.PDF?_ga=1.178459428.1435750642.1485623721
From the Warranty disclosure:
"A copy of the original invoice, receipt or bill of sale for the purchase of the Product or Accessory. You
must present a valid proof of purchase upon making any claims pursuant to this Limited Warranty. If no valid proof of purchase is supplied and the Product or Accessory was manufactured more than fifteen (15) months prior to the date the claim is made, HTC has no obligation to provide support under the Limited Warranty."
pastorbennett said:
Verizon won't do anything for you. The only way they would is if you are the original purchaser, in which case they will replace the device if it's within the manufacturer's 1 year warranty. HTC *might* do something for you, but I'm not too knowledgeable on their warranty policy. There's a good chance they will restrict warranty service to the original purchaser, or tell you that since it's a Verizon phone, you'll have to go through them. HTC does offer a one-time "uh-oh" protection, but that's limited to people who purchased their phone through HTC.com.
You can try it yourself, the digitizer runs around $70 on eBay, but it isn't a simple repair. Otherwise, most screen repair services charge in the $150-$200 range.
Here's the HTC warranty information. It looks like you'll want to have the phone 100% stock with locked bootloader and s-on. http://dl4.htc.com/Web_materials/Ma...evA.PDF?_ga=1.178459428.1435750642.1485623721
From the Warranty disclosure:
"A copy of the original invoice, receipt or bill of sale for the purchase of the Product or Accessory. You
must present a valid proof of purchase upon making any claims pursuant to this Limited Warranty. If no valid proof of purchase is supplied and the Product or Accessory was manufactured more than fifteen (15) months prior to the date the claim is made, HTC has no obligation to provide support under the Limited Warranty."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, everything that you said is about what I was expecting myself. But htc surprised me by accepting it as an in-warranty claim. We'll see how it goes.
Tarima said:
Thanks, everything that you said is about what I was expecting myself. But htc surprised me by accepting it as an in-warranty claim. We'll see how it goes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good to hear. I'd wager it's because the date of manufacture is well within the 12 months, since I don't think the HTC 10 has even been out a year. It says a lot about a company that they're honoring their warranty when, technically, the don't have to.
That's awesome and it definitely says a lot about what type of company HTC is. They have been my go to for years and I'm so happy to continue backing them when they make business decisions like these.
LakesideWiseman said:
That's awesome and it definitely says a lot about what type of company HTC is. They have been my go to for years and I'm so happy to continue backing them when they make business decisions like these.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, I was also impressed when I had my m7 and they offered to fix my purple-tinted camera for free way after the warranty was over (I didn't go for it because they said I would absolutely have to pay to fix my screen at the same time even though I didn't want to). But I've also heard bad things about their customer service (for example at the launch of the 10). This is my first time dealing with a warranty claim with HTC so I'll cross my fingers it goes well.
Update for anyone in a similar situation: HTC replaced the screen and shipped the phone back to me from Texas to Montreal, Canada overnight at no charge. The whole process including my own shipping took only 8 days, pretty impressive. And not a single dent/scratch or other trace of the repair. Very impressed with this service.
Only downside is having to pay 40$ shipping with insurance for a faulty device, but considering I didn't have a receipt I won't complain too much here!