Hello, i was trying to compile TCPMP Player for WIN32 and i got following error.
PHP:
Performing Custom Build Step
'yasm' is not recognized as an internal or external command,
operable program or batch file.
Project : error PRJ0019: A tool returned an error code from "Performing Custom Build Step"
Build log was saved at "c:\cc\tcpmp.src.0.72RC1\tcpmp\common\Debug\BuildLog.htm"
common - 1 error(s), 0 warning(s)
I version is tcpmp.src.0.72RC1 and compile with VS2005/2008. It compile ok for PPC / WINDOWS MOBILES. But i found WIN32 project on http://picard.exceed.hu/ and try to compile for WIN32. I start compile "common" project as it is depend for all project and it give that error.
So has anybody have experience compiling TCPMP for WIN32 and anybody know what error is that.
Many thanks
Can't help but have some sources you may like...
I'm no coder but I've been keeping an eye on every TCPMP build that pops up... Since this is still the very best free media player and since the unnofficial builds have a tendency to eventually die out I've been collecting sources I find relevant.
milesmowbray released a vs2008 build and sources. He gives info there. Also check this post by Invario which has a higher max char limit which fixes streaming from Youtube.
If you plan on adding subtitles there is a moddified source of core components (you may want to apply any needed changes to milesmowbray sources and make a separate subtitle.plg file from these sources). They don't have Intel XScale support...
To fix possible ID3v2 Unicode issues or add Pocket Scrobbler (Last.FM) capabilities I found these sources.
There are also some mods of the sources of ffmpeg.plg that add flv1 (works better than the official one with all other formats too) and flv4 (version 0.54 works fine but I can't get 0.55 to work). It would be cool if these were merged into a single plugin.
The avc/h264 source of the plugin that circles in many unnofficial builds seems to be lost but I found the TCPMP MX27 project.
I'd love to see a new PPC build.... You can find all these sources and more in my signature (they sould also be good for Win32). Also please do share any modified sources and builds you make
Hope it helps.
Hello, Many thanks for your reply and sources. I have been look at all the sources you have provided , some of them are very useful when i go ahead for the next step.
For the compiling info for WIN32, i have look at readme file and all the web as well , but there is not much i can find.
I am not a good programmer , also in this case i am not trying to modified the source of the way the player work, but i do think it is the only concern is the project setting or some setting file in the solution.
What i have found out so far is even thought this error , i can generate all library(lib) files (but no .plg file ) and i can get TCPMP WIN32 output file and i can run this application ON MY PC with the precompiled libraries from the web. So i also think the only problem i got now is to compile the "common" project and if this project setting error (Project : error PRJ0019: A tool returned an error code from "Performing Custom Build Step" ) goes way , all the other projects that depends for this project might be ok. So i need to find out how to set up project setting for "common" project.
Many thanks
I found another project at SourceForge that has a Win32 build and sources aswell as a wiki. It's OpenSVC decoder.
As another alternative pudn.com has a lot of sources/documentations/configs up for download (you need to upload some sources to be able to download from there...). Site seems to work best using IE.
Many thanks for your info, OpenSVC decoder is built for WIN32 and there is WIKI explanation , i need to install YASM to compile this. After install this still getting similar error. But this site is a good start to compile for WIN32 and i will keep on trying base on this. For pudn site , there is WIN32 build as well but it always problem when i upload files since last year, so i give up now.
Anyway many thanks for your time and info.
No problem. Just make sure you release your builds and sources in the forum if you ever do anything for PocketPCs.
Related
Hi all,
I think this forum is the right place for such king of things. I want to share an updated Windows CE log dump tool. The original version of the tool is called UIDumpViewer 1.0 and located at http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/...28-09e4-4a87-a8e4-a06f2352b754&displaylang=en.
I'm working on a very big Windows Mobile project and due to bugs in this tool it was impossible to see any info from Dr. Watson dump files. There were exceptions while loading either kdmp or pdb files. The original files have been decompiled using .NET Reflector. I've fixed some bugs, compiled it back and now the tool works much better ( at least for me ).
I've also implemented a small console viewer. You can find both two tools as well as all sources in attachment. FYI: you could use a great tool called CrashFinder 2.5 developed by John Robbins at http://www.wintellect.com/CS/blogs/jrobbins/archive/2006/04/19/crashfinder-returns.aspx. This utility helps you determine the line of code by exception address.
Hello,
great job. Got some hints:
msdia71.dll ist required and must be registered correctly (PB5 uninstaller removed the DLL but failed to unregister it so I wondered why nothing worked)
IDiaDataSource::loadAndValidateDataFromPdb is called for loading the PDB (will also validate it). In case one is sure that PDBs match the binaries except for the time stamps one should call IDiaDataSource::loadDataFromPdb instead and skip the validation.
Hi,
I am new to the android development and a bit confused from all this (root, no root etc).
Say I want to write a new kernel driver to handle keyboard input, and want it to run only on my phone. And my phone is not the developer phone, nor exploitable for root privilege escalation.
Can I download the source files and compile a new kernel with my driver? I guess I cannot use the Android sources, but need my phone specific branch. e.g if I own an HTC Hero I need to get the specific sources from HTC, and they don't publish kernel sources for all their models...
But if I found the source, add my sources and compiled it, It should be easy (and legit ) to load the new image to the consumer phone right ?
Thanks
Roee
More or less that is correct. The source code will contain the license terms, if it says GPL then you are golden. If you get the source from a questionable route and it's not necessarily "public" then it goes into a gray area. Generically speaking, if you get the Android source, and the source code for your keyboard, build an image with it, flash it to your phone, then you are perfectly fine. If you choose to redistribute that code that you mashed together, it's arguable you'd then also have to publish your mashed up code or at the very least the 2 sources you used to mash it together. Mash is the best word I can think of right now
-Chad
Thanks for the reply Chad.
If the software is GPL, and I don't intend to publish the code, I just want to play and check couple of things.
I wonder if i can only compile a new keyboard driver (for example), and just load the ko file somehow without flushing the whole kernel.
I don't have much experience in the linux world, but I would guess it will be something like :
get the branch from the android git
compile a new kernel object for the keyboard
use adb to load the ko file to the device
insmod the new device
somehow remove the current keyboard device and map a new device with the new kernel driver
is this the correct flow ? is there example of how to do it somewhere ?
Cheers
Roee
Ok, I think I have a little better understanding after I played with my G1 today...
So now I understand how to enumerate all the devices in the system, and find the proper devices (e.g using cat /proc/bus/input/devices , or in /devices/virtual/input/ ), but I fail to understand how to replace the proper lkm module. When I run lsmod, the only module loaded is the Wlan module.
How can I find which file is responsible for the keyboard and replace it with my driver? Or must I recompile the whole kernel in order to replace the driver with my modified driver?
I guess it became an easy linux questions.... (just not easy for me )
I've read the other threads about this but there is no help to be found there unfortunately.
I've been playing with App Inventor because I wanted to avoid learning Java but my think now is that seeing as I do JavaScript/PHP/mySQL and HTML/CSS anyway I might as well do my app development properly.
I've been following the instructions at the official developer.android.com site.
and the part where I have the problem is with Eclipse - at step 1 on that page. I've installed the JDK but when I try to install Eclipse I get an error telling me that there is no Virtual Java machine in the eclipse\jre\bin\ folder.
Well I'm following the instructions so what can I do about this? I don't even understand the error. Is there supposed to be a file in this folder, a folder which a.doesn't come with the standard Eclipse .zip file and which b.doesn't exist at all!
I tried this all before some time ago and got the same problem. At that time I couldn't even use App Inventor because of some JDK/JRE problem but I un-installed and reinstalled Java and App Inventor is working now.
This is one of the most frustrating computing problems I've faced because I've searched all over for an answer and there is nothing out there. Frankly I'm a little surprised at how poor the installation documentation is
The only thing I can think of is I have the wrong version of Eclipse. Which exact one is everyone else using?
Hello Subjective Effect. There is not a folder named eclipse\jre\bin in eclipse installation folder. The version i m using is eclipse-helios. I was not faced the problem you have.
I've solved that part of the problem by downloading a different version of Eclipse. It is a Helios version and is the one with Java. The installation instructions are not clear on this.
I now have another issue but I'll try work that out for the time being.
So I've no idea (again because the instructions are so poor) what to do about this.
I'm on the Android Developers site and trying to start the Hello World tutorial. I'm already stumped at the stage of creating a New Project because after I set up Project name, Application name, Package name and Create Activity clicking "Finish" gives this error:
[2010-10-28 01:33:03 - HelloAndroid] ERROR: Unable to open class file C:\workspace\HelloAndroid\gen\com\subjectiveeffect\helloandroid\R.java: No such file or directory
The reason I think the docs are poor is am I supposed to have created this directory or does Eclipse create it for you? And if it's supposed to be created for you what am I doing wrong?
Subjective Effect said:
So I've no idea (again because the instructions are so poor) what to do about this.
I'm on the Android Developers site and trying to start the Hello World tutorial. I'm already stumped at the stage of creating a New Project because after I set up Project name, Application name, Package name and Create Activity clicking "Finish" gives this error:
[2010-10-28 01:33:03 - HelloAndroid] ERROR: Unable to open class file C:\workspace\HelloAndroid\gen\com\subjectiveeffect\helloandroid\R.java: No such file or directory
The reason I think the docs are poor is am I supposed to have created this directory or does Eclipse create it for you? And if it's supposed to be created for you what am I doing wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine seems to have that error no matter what I type in.
So what have you done about it? Or can I continue without worrying, is this a trivial error message?
1) you should download Eclipse 3.5.2 as Helios is not supported by Android plugin yet.
http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/packages/eclipse-classic-352/galileosr2
2) R.java problem should go away if you restart eclipse
Also, to start with better use the existing sample project HelloWorld rather than setting up your own.
This is a common known bug. You can use the latest eclipse version, once you setup a project, you will have to go under project properties and choose compiler version 1.6, which is set to 1.5 usually.
Tha will solve the problem, because i was facing the same a few days ago when starting to mess with SDK and Eclipse.
I had a similar problem and gave up for awhile and when I came back to it I found out that I didn't have my paths set correctly for the java jdk, not sure if that is it but it worked for me.
I find if I restart Eclipse it fixes things.
I've been playing with layouts!
We have an imageinfo.bin, and S000, S001, S002, and S003. We need to combine them somehow.
So, I've found threads that will teach you how to create ROMs based on imageInfo.bin files, but does anyone know how to take the pieces of a DLL (or executable) and put them together as a standalone DLL? We are trying to do that in this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=844008&page=3
For an example of what we are trying to assemble, check here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=444604&d=1290160423
You need to get recmod.exe.
Awesome, thanks! You rock.
I'm running into an error message though, "Error! ProcessCase0: bit 5 is zero!" I think maybe the file format for windows phone 7 is different. Is there anywhere I can go to understand this problem, and maybe get the source code and fix it or something?
FWIW my suspicion is that recmode.exe doesn't properly handle signed binaries, since all the WP7 binaries are signed, but previous WM versions weren't all signed.
Ondraster probably knows the right way to re-file them.
OndraSter doesn't know the actual way .
Binaries in WP7 are a bit different, maybe those e32 and whatever (I haven't dug into this ever, don't understand it and I'm not sure it is worth learning, since WM is going off and WP7 won't be cookable or worth cooking) are different and recmod can't handle its new awesomeness .
Hey OndraSter,
Thanks for the reply. It seems it would be something useful in our efforts to run native code on Windows 7 to be able to recmod those things. Do you have the source code, or any tips on how to go about figuring it out? I can give you all the credit, all I want is to be able to assemble the files!
I have the same problem...
Way back when, I could run a c# compiler on my Windows Mobile phone and create apps. I think it would be fun to do on-device "compilation" on my Desire Z too.
I'm not asking for an IDE -- just something that can take Java source code and XML files, compile to bytecode for Dalvik and produce an .apk -- all on the device itself.
Is this possible?
OK -- we'd have to both a javac (java compiler) and a dx tool running on the device to do this. The first compiles the java source, the second takes that file and converts it to Dalvik bytecode.
Anyone else interested in this?
I'm very interested too. I tried sl4a but it's limited for now.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Dexify java compiler
I'm also very interested!
I develop in Java for the Eve VM on Windows Mobile: [www t-arn com/software.htm]
but for this I needed to install a JavaVM on the device.
But it should be possible to dexify the java compiler. I found following post:
[www ist-music eu/developer-zone/documentation/phoneme-and-osgi/music-on-android]
The porting of OSGi requires the dexification of the OSGi bundles. This is a process which makes any JAR file (compliant with Java VM) compatible with Dalvik VM. It basically consists on adding a new file, classes.dex, into the JAR file. To dexify each OSGi bundle, a two-step process is required by using the Android SDK tools. In windows, the process would be:
* Create the classes.dex file associated to the JAR file:
[ANDROID_SDK]\platforms\android-1.5\tools\dx.bat --dex --output=%CD%\classes.dex my_bundle.jar
* Incorporate the classes.dex file into the JAR file:
[ANDROID_SDK]\platforms\android-1.5\tools\aapt.exe add my_bundle.jar classes.dex
Now, the dexified bundles work on both VMs: Java VM and Dalvik VM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess, we could do that for javac. If this does not work, we could try another Java compiler:
- EJC: [thecoderlounge blogspot com/2010/05/ecj-eclipse-java-compiler.html]
- kopisusu: [klomp org/KopiSusu/download.html]
I have no idea how to dexify the dx tool, though :-((
Hope to hear more from you guys
Tom
I have not yet gotten the Android SDK (nor a device...) but it seems that the dx tool itself is written in java. There is a dx.jar in the SKD. This one might already be dexified...or we could dexify with itself.
Tom
On-device development & compiler on a server...
Hi guys, I'm new to this Forum - just got my Archos 101 and now I'm searching for some more fun with it ;-)
So I really liked you guy's idea of having a compiler on the device itself - especially since the java compiler's really fast, so no doubt it can run on a smartphone...
I was really tempted by the open source "Open Blocks" library (education.mit.edu/openblocks) from some of these "Lifelong Kindergarden" people at the MIT... they're having this neat programming environment for teaching children programming, where you can drag/drop your source code like Lego...
Here you can have a look how the programming looks:
education.mit.edu/webdav/How%20to%20Create%20a%20Procedure/How_to_Create_a_Procedure.html
Now even google is using a similar thing, probably the same sources for their "App Inventor" (appinventor.googlelabs.com/about/), but you can only develop online at a real pc, then the .apk file is packaged on the server and downloaded to your android device...
So that's practically another way of having stuff compiled "on your device" - you could do the the development on a device and then have a server dedicated for a fast compiler and dx run...
Basically, I'd say that's the perfect system to write quick programs on a touchscreen device, especially when it's a bit larger tablet...
So if anyone wants to join in, I think I'm really keen on trying to port this OpenBlocks thing to the android screen ;-)
Cheers,
wowbag
Java IDE on Android
Hello everybody
I have just finished the latest version of taJavaIDE (0.3.0)
This APK is meant to become an Android development tool with which you can create native Android apps (APKs) ON the Android device itself.
What is working so far (on my Desire HD):
- Eclipse compiler for Java is integrated and working
- dx tool is integrated (not yet tested properly)
- BeanShell Interpreter is integrated and working.
You can write your own BeanShell script, store it on your SDCard and automate
the build process with it.
What is NOT yet working:
- aapt
- apkbuilder
- jarsigner
- zipalign
apkbuilder and jarsigner should not be a problem. I think, I can integrate those in the same way I integrated ecj.
As far as I know, zipalign is not absolutely needed (I might be wrong here, though).
My biggest problem is aapt which is not a Java application but a C++ application. To make it run on Android, you would need to port it to Java (looks like a REAL challenge!) or use the NDK to create a native library that you could then access from the APK.
I have no experience with the NDK and I also don't have the necessary build environment, so I would really appreciate if someone would help me out here!
Anybody interested in contributing?
Tom
Wow, thanks for getting this started, t-arn!
It's been forever since I did any C++, but I'll take a look at aapt and see what I can figure out.
Hopefully, a true C++ programmer will come along and set us straight
I'm very interested in this project and I would be willing to try to help out if you need it. I'm a second year software engineering student and I'm currently on a work term where all of my work is with android. I may not be of much help but at least I think I have some idea what I'm doing so let me know.
you are correct in saying that zipalign is not necessary. we only need it if we want to sign the apk in release mode(for publishing it to the market). We could just use debug mode and everything would be fine. I'm sure that if someone wanted to release an apk to the market, they could just copy the files over to their pc and zipalign it there. We would still be able to use the apk on the device without using zipalign.
t-arn said:
- jarsigner
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Serison has an application on the market to sign APK's. Just thought I would let you know it is possible.
I would like this as well, as my phone has a physical keyboard and typing code isn't that bad on it - atleast not for minor edits/tweaks
JavaIDEdroid open source project
Hello everybody
I have created an open source project for JavaIDEdroid:
http://code.google.com/p/java-ide-droid/
Everybody is welcome to join the project (and hopefully contribute to it!)
As soon as I have cleaned up the code a little bit, I'll upload the source and the current APK.
For further questions and discussions, please join the java-ide-droid group. You'll find the link on the project's home page.
See you there!
Tom
Sounds pretty promising,looking forward to give it a try！
Sent from my Dell Streak using XDA App
Sounds possible, if you have the right components. I would love this. Would definitely donate to whoever got it working easily and 100%.
Very interesting project
Look nice. Downloading now.
I have wanted this since I first got an android phone.
I ended up using a virtual debain command line running OpenJava to compile and run the stuff. But if i can do it without that hastle in one app, I will LOVE you.
Edit: I tried it out. Mind explaining how to make a beanShell script? on the ECJ it always gives me a security exception even with just -help.
Code:
java.lang.SecurityException
at java.lang.System.setSecurityManager(System.java:610)
at com.t_arn.JavaIDEdroid,.DE.fnCompile(IDE.java:44)
at com.t_arn.JavaIDEdroid.MainActivity.fnCompile(MainActivty.java:167)
at com.t_arn.JavaIDEdroid.MainActivity.tabCompile_btnCompile(MainActivity.java:137)
......
Done in 1305348377 sec.
Please join the JavaIDEdroid support group at http://groups.google.com/group/java-ide-droid and re-post your question there.
I'd like to keep discussions there.
Thanks
Tom
very interesting, ill join the group, i can make the native lib for the aapt.
I would say get gcc working on the device then you can compile anything. You can compile a javavm. A native binary. Etc. If gcc can be compiled and work then all programs most likely can be compiled on the device assuming the proper libs are there to compile against.
Sent from my Incredible using Tapatalk