Related
Hello
I've flashe new ROM from SE (Vodafone UK image APP_SW_X1i_VFE_UK_CDF1215-0285_KOV_R2AA007).
I ran SKTools benchmark before and had results as below (without tweaks):
Integer;327.3780;Moves/25 usec
Floating point;7.399;MWIPS
RAM access;1471;Speed index
Draw bitmaps;788;Speed index
Main storage (write);10326.05;KB/sec
Main storage (read);16786.89;KB/sec
Storage Card (write); 652.30;KB/sec
Storage Card (read);2084.12;KB/sec
Now the test results after upgrading:
Integer;327.5500;Moves/25 usec
Floating point;7.499;MWIPS
RAM access;1516;Speed index
Draw bitmaps;776;Speed index
Main storage (write);2133.33;KB/sec
Main storage (read);7102.89;KB/sec
Storage Card (write); 983.04;KB/sec
Storage Card (read);6212.34;KB/sec
As You see, performance of mainstorage is poor.
Please write your experiences.
re
me the same, look here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=459328&page=32
but subjective the device seems faster
hmm interesting, however from what i've seen around the forums, I believe SKtools benchmarks don't really provide very accurate results . . .
Other strange thing is that it's almost impossible to improwe performance using those well known tweaks (filesystem cache, glyph buffering ...)
mobilemodman said:
hmm interesting, however from what i've seen around the forums, I believe SKtools benchmarks don't really provide very accurate results . . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well I used to repeat SKTools benchmark few times and use statistic theorem
So that results are stable. In fact running benchmark for the first time usually gives wrong results (differing from average).
@ macko - yep that is true aswell, however running the benchmark is so time consuming, I dont think anyone would actually bother getting all those statistics
mobilemodman said:
@ macko - yep that is true aswell, however running the benchmark is so time consuming, I dont think anyone would actually bother getting all those statistics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My loved wife says the same
have you tried spb benchmark?
First of all, despite of the memory benchmarks, the results are quite the same. So what basically changed is the speed of Flash-Rom access, where the internal memory got slower and the external (memory card) appearently faster.
Did you have installed the SD card tweak on the previous and/or new ROM. It was said to be the only tweak really significantly improve the speed at all.
I also think that the memory card speed subjectively is quite low with the old ROM. The question now is: What's more important, high internal memory speed or high memory card speed. I'd go for the first since most applications are stored in the internal memory but that depends.
Does it also occur with other types of the new ROM, I mean from other manufacturers or without branding. I read that they differ slightly, so that could have an influence too.
fards said:
have you tried spb benchmark?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like to but there was no sense if I didn't previously tested with it. Can anybody post results obtained using spb benchmark? (before - after)
Dandie said:
First of all, despite of the memory benchmarks, the results are quite the same. So what basically changed is the speed of Flash-Rom access, where the internal memory got slower and the external (memory card) appearently faster.
Did you have installed the SD card tweak on the previous and/or new ROM. It was said to be the only tweak really significantly improve the speed at all.
I also think that the memory card speed subjectively is quite low with the old ROM. The question now is: What's more important, high internal memory speed or high memory card speed. I'd go for the first since most applications are stored in the internal memory but that depends.
Does it also occur with other types of the new ROM, I mean from other manufacturers or without branding. I read that they differ slightly, so that could have an influence too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Dandie,
the tweak was installed on both roms branded old/unbranded new,
on the branded rom the sd read and write was very faster after installing the sdcardtool
but
with the new rom the benchmark results are slower and much more with the tweak
i'm assuming updating the rom wipes the phone clean back to factory settings? i'd hate to have to reinstall everything?!
@ stats101: Right!
rookie333 said:
Hi Dandie,
the tweak was installed on both roms branded old/unbranded new,
on the branded rom the sd read and write was very faster after installing the sdcardtool
but
with the new rom the benchmark results are slower and much more with the tweak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahm. what??? What I would like to see are benchmarks without the tweak, from both, old and new ROM. Did anyone try that?
Anyone with R2A can use SPB Benchmark please?
It's more accurated for a real use.
Then I post my result of R1A hardresetted.
Thx.
Dandie said:
Ahm. what??? What I would like to see are benchmarks without the tweak, from both, old and new ROM. Did anyone try that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi dandie,
the benchmark from old rom i remember, was a little bit lower than the new rom without tweak.
anyway, i don't thrust the benchmark and the tweaks, because the system feels a bit faster, with or without tweak, there's no different.
Benchmarks ? Here we go !
Darth Sith said:
Anyone with R2A can use SPB Benchmark please?
It's more accurated for a real use.
Then I post my result of R1A hardresetted.
Thx.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a look here :
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=3242912#post3242912
In my POV mine runs pretty faster and stable
Curiously enough, benchmarks point towards the other direction
I ain't going back: I prefer "real feel" over cold benchmarks
gtrab said:
In my POV mine runs pretty faster and stable
Curiously enough, benchmarks point towards the other direction
I ain't going back: I prefer "real feel" over cold benchmarks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Me neither !
My feelings are the same as yours ... !
I upgraded to R2A a few days ago on my x1a, and I couldn't really notice any significant difference in speed between the two firmwares just from day to day use. However, when I loaded up the HTC youtube app, I found the new firmware to clearly have quite a lot of difficulty playing back clips at high quality with dropped frames, desynced audio, etc, whereas the same youtube clips would play flawlessly on my R1A Xperia. Also, I feel like video playback is more choppy in the Media panel, although Coreplayer playback is still the same as before. I have reflashed my x1a twice with the R2A firmware, and both times video playback performance suffered. Now I'm back to R1A and video is working fine. Does anyone else have this problem?
Hi,
In the specification sheet of HTC HD, it is clearly said that Ram is 288 and Rom is 512. But when I turn on the device, I saw that the memory for storage is 322 (71 in use) and for program is 195.58 (80 in use).
Where are the missing part?
288-195=93 MB of RAM
512-322=190 MB of ROM?
Yes, because if your ROM was empty, your device would not start up. If your RAM was empty, you wouldn't have an Operating System loaded into it to run it.
The figures you have quoted are the factory / in use figures... i.e. Once you have started your phone up, some of the RAM gets used up by loading the OS from ROM.
I hate to sound patronising and pedantic, but if you had to ask that question, you should have probably bought an iPhone.
Budadank said:
have started your phone up, some of the RAM gets used up by loading the OS from ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I knew this. But I am surprised that the OS takes such a large mount of RAM and ROM.
Do you mean that 512-322=190 MB of ROM is used for storing OS and other default apps like manila; and 288-195=93 MB of RAM is for WM 6.1?
After a soft restart, there are already 80MB RAM in use so I only have 100 MB for other apps out of 288 MB!!
I guess there should be a way to reduce the RAM and ROM usage by deleting some default apps. There is wm PPC comes with 128 RAM which gives user <100 mb to use. I am expecting that since HD has 288, I should have at least 200 mb instead of 100 mb to run my apps.
PS: I dislike the way apple manages iphone and mac. So no thanks.
Lots of the cooked ROMs in the ROM development forum cut out a lot of the fat - there are varying degrees between completely minimal to fully functional - depends on what you want. I think you will find it very difficult to fill the ROM on your device with programs etc - and media is what the Micro SD slot is for.
Could maybe do with a little more RAM at times but you can kill stuff with the taskmanager if you find your phone getting a bit sluggish.
Budadank said:
Could maybe do with a little more RAM at times but you can kill stuff with the taskmanager if you find your phone getting a bit sluggish.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you on this point.
Are there any tweaks to do this?
acolytelee said:
I agree with you on this point.
Are there any tweaks to do this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could always use CleanRAM which does as it says, cleans RAM. Some apps or games like Xtrakt or NFS Undercover sometimes won't run due to insufficient RAM. After using this app on setting 2 they work.
Other than this your best bet is to use a lite rom with little or no apps installed on it so you can choose what you want.
Fallen Spartan said:
Other than this your best bet is to use a lite rom with little or no apps installed on it so you can choose what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.
The lite rom, 6.1 or 6.5, does a lot to reduce Rom, which is not so useful, but not that much to the Ram.
The available ram is still 190 ~ 195 mb.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=482258
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=502618
However, it does cut off the Ram in use from 80 to 45 mb so finally one has 150 mb. but where is the missing 288-195?
I think you might need to just get over it matey. In proportion, it's actually not a lot of RAM usage at all. Not when you consider Windows Vista is happy when it has 1GB all to itself and then another GB for programs to run in. That's about 50% for the OS. You're moaning about the OS using about 35% of your RAM.
Budadank said:
I think you might need to just get over it matey. In proportion, it's actually not a lot of RAM usage at all. Not when you consider Windows Vista is happy when it has 1GB all to itself and then another GB for programs to run in. That's about 50% for the OS. You're moaning about the OS using about 35% of your RAM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for PC or laptops it's fine with that usage because you can buy rams at very cheap price.
I just dont understand why there is a missing 100 MB ram for wm 6.1 os. the other phones, such as htc nike with 128mb ram give program mem of 100mb. so the os takes only 28 mb.
http://i249.photobucket.com/albums/gg233/nikiproject/niki-project-v10.png
Fallen Spartan said:
You could always use CleanRAM which does as it says, cleans RAM. Some apps or games like Xtrakt or NFS Undercover sometimes won't run due to insufficient RAM. After using this app on setting 2 they work.
Other than this your best bet is to use a lite rom with little or no apps installed on it so you can choose what you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You posted CleanRAM v1.1, v1.7 is out dude
When I check the amount of free ram after I start my Omnia II it shows that I have somewhere around 70mb free, with half of the ram showing as "reserved".
I feel like I was cheated into buying a device which only has half the advertised amount of ram. Sure, it might be there... somewhere... but why can't we have it? Why is half of the ram "reserved" and what is the purpose of this exactly? Is there anyway to set it free?
it is possible that Samsung reserved it for Touch Wiz or samsung apps included in Rom?
Hi guys! I have the same problem. Over half RAM Memory is "reserved". I hope somebody can help us in getting more available RAM. Thanks!
"Sorg" over at modaco has determined that approx 100 is reserved for the radio, camera and hardware accelerated graphics.
currently the page pool is aprox 20 mb but the newest release from "secany" over at modaco has Samsung reducing the page pool to 15 mb to give us an extra 5 mb of ram.
maybe omnia II case is similar to the HD2 case where some geek find out how to increase RAM memory... seems that HD2 also had reserved memory for ie. radio and other functionalities and it was solved how to release it.. don't know the case in details but read over net that someone did that creating new kind of rom.
i hope xda devs can fix this issue. This is one big issue why the omnia is not so great if this gets solved then all the problems would go away. I would glady give up some space from my storage if need to et maybe 128MB free. after a cold boot i get around 60MB free thats with spb and mskip both running
jebise101 said:
i hope xda devs can fix this issue. This is one big issue why the omnia is not so great if this gets solved then all the problems would go away. I would glady give up some space from my storage if need to et maybe 128MB free. after a cold boot i get around 60MB free thats with spb and mskip both running
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rom and Ram(random access memory) are two diff things, you cant give up internal mem as ram.
We hope one day our brother inside xda dev or modaco can create the Tools & ROM to reFormat the RAM and Hidden Store in My Storage, so we can get more storage with workable ROM, tq
ratsbane said:
maybe omnia II case is similar to the HD2 case where some geek find out how to increase RAM memory... seems that HD2 also had reserved memory for ie. radio and other functionalities and it was solved how to release it.. don't know the case in details but read over net that someone did that creating new kind of rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hd2 has 128 hardware but were hidden by htc i don't think omnia has it
hoss_n2 said:
hd2 has 128 hardware but were hidden by htc i don't think omnia has it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Omnia 2 has 256 MB RAM as per tech spes, but only ~140 is usable, the rest remain for radio etc. so maybe this remaining ~100 MB could be accessible somehow as on HD2
ratsbane said:
Omnia 2 has 256 MB RAM as per tech spes, but only ~140 is usable, the rest remain for radio etc. so maybe this remaining ~100 MB could be accessible somehow as on HD2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the extra 128 rams in hd2 were disabled not used by radio
redzone321 said:
"Sorg" over at modaco has determined that approx 100 is reserved for the radio, camera and hardware accelerated graphics.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if camera has reserved ram then why does it have to shutdown everything else or complains about the memory and won't start :s
good question. Anybody knows how it works or how it is supposed to work?
64mb - radio (radio chipset has no ram so it uses system mem)
36mb - os crap(pagepool,etc..)
16mb - graphics mem
256-64-36-16=140mb available to wm
64mb for the radio is... kinda too much. Seriously, what does it need that much RAM for?
ginkage said:
64mb for the radio is... kinda too much. Seriously, what does it need that much RAM for?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
exactly thinking the same way
Any updates anyone? The RAM problem is pretty much the ONLY issue I have with this phone..
azza6 said:
Any updates anyone? The RAM problem is pretty much the ONLY issue I have with this phone..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
easiest way to solve it is to go back to 6.1 rom you get aprox 110-120 mb of free ram. theres a few on modaco.
Or personaly i find if i use titanium + disable lock screen(usetouchlockpro), diable default dialer(use PhonEx for dialer/contacts) you get 90 mb after boot. which settles down to aprox 80-85.
This is useing Sonblack rom from PDAViet
it can be found at PDAViet or Modaco!
redzone321 said:
easiest way to solve it is to go back to 6.1 rom you get aprox 110-120 mb of free ram.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true, my one is 6.1 and yet less than 25m I can use this space even though so call factory default after reset. The bloody main storage has 512m, almost 500m has been used. I have not install any program yet. The 8G is used about 0.6G which wasted so much space. Samsung designers really screwed up!
Looks like even thought upgrade to 6.5 also did not improve much of the main storage space, that really sad..
I was shocked by these amounts of free memory too.
I was found only ONE solution...FLASHING some LITE or ULITE (Ultra LITE) ROM.
I personally flashed rom by Speedfrog: http://windows.modaco.com/topic/323437-lite-roms-by-speedfrog/
Free main memory about 300MB and free Ram about 110MB...I'm using it for more than one year with great success.
hi all,
it seems no change in speed by using 576MB hacked instead of original 488Mb (for my personal experience after using 2 cooked roms).
Can anyone help to give me more info for this such as advantage/disadvantage for these size and will it harm system or not?
Actually, it just happy me with bigger free size of ~300mb
thanks
This issue could also have other reasons.
Imagine you have a car
On the speedometer max speed is 200 km / h
Now you build a speedometer with a top speed 300 km / h
each now looks in the car assumes
that you have a tuned car which goes really fast
WM apps usually consume something between 0.2 (Outlook) to 10MB of memory (TomTom), so having 200MB free is more than enough for some serious multitasking. So, it is definitely not needed, but does not make any harm either.
I don´t agree, I had a Diamond with 192 mb ram and a touch HD with 288 mb ram, and both just powered, the HD was a lot faster, just because of the 100 mb extra ram (both had more than 50% ram free)
extra ram wont make the machine faster per say... it just increases the ability to handle more
If there was no advantage, then HTC would have probably not reales a HD2 with twice the amount of memory as the first release.
pkoper said:
If there was no advantage, then HTC would have probably not reales a HD2 with twice the amount of memory as the first release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I totally agree, especially since they haven't done that.
pkoper said:
If there was no advantage, then HTC would have probably not reales a HD2 with twice the amount of memory as the first release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as johnc says... they havent done that.
What they did do is release the T-Mobile Us version with twice as much ROM.
nothing to do with RAM. get your facts straight.
The T-Mobile US version however does have an extra 128MB RAM. But like i said above... there is no increase in overall performance. Extra RAM simply means it is able to handle more multitasking.
Gurgulio said:
This issue could also have other reasons.
Imagine you have a car
On the speedometer max speed is 200 km / h
Now you build a speedometer with a top speed 300 km / h
each now looks in the car assumes
that you have a tuned car which goes really fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think this is the best answer. Yes, it just bring us the feeling.
some of you misunderstand my question. Of course, bigger ram size is surely faster but in this case, it is just a tweak from original 488Mb (hardware) up to 567Mb (fake ram )
bigfun said:
i think this is the best answer. Yes, it just bring us the feeling.
some of you misunderstand my question. Of course, bigger ram size is surely faster but in this case, it is just a tweak from original 488Mb (hardware) up to 567Mb (fake ram )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no all hd2 have same rame size 576 ,it is not tweak to show fake capacities ,and it had been tested
hoss_n2 said:
no all hd2 have same rame size 576 ,it is not tweak to show fake capacities ,and it had been tested
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is is the truth? my HD2 show only 488mb with stock rom
bigfun said:
is is the truth? my HD2 show only 488mb with stock rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It requires a tweak to 'unlock' the extra RAM as it has been 'hidden' by the ROM software.
bigfun said:
is is the truth? my HD2 show only 488mb with stock rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it willnot show the 576 with out flashing new roms and new radios as the old os doesnot support this amound of ram
rp-x1 said:
It requires a tweak to 'unlock' the extra RAM as it has been 'hidden' by the ROM software.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a tweak or change the rom
From the technical point of view. When an application is started the operating system loads the application from the ROM into the RAM memory, this process is slow because ROM memory is slower to read than RAM memory. So in order to take full advantage of the CPU 1GHZ processor, the operating system needs enough RAM memory to load the full application. RAM memory sits right on top of the CPU and communication between the CPU and RAM is very fast. If there isn't enough RAM memory the operating system will load part of the application into RAM and the rest will remain on the ROM. This will make the operating system to constantly read ROM memory which slows down your application. In some cases when an application is stopped the operating system might not release corresponding RAM memory, this is called a LEAKING POINTER. In this case you will need to reboot your system to release the memory. Having too many LEAKING POINTER will make your phone run slower because operating system constantly has to go to the ROM memory instead of using the full potential of the RAM
malisha1 said:
this is called a LEAKING POINTER
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol...
Nearly as funny as RAMAROM!
With over 448MB of RAM, I really doubt that any WM app is going to cause problems with memory leaks to the extent that an app cannot run properly. Bear in mind that WM apps are tiny, compared to Windows (PC) applications, so the same rules don't really apply. Yes, they do, okay, but these things simply don't happen.
You really shouldn't notice any difference between 448MB of RAM and 576MB of RAM. If you do, it's in your head, probably because you want to believe it. Perception is not always fact.
johncmolyneux said:
lol...
Nearly as funny as RAMAROM!
With over 448MB of RAM, I really doubt that any WM app is going to cause.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with you but if you are a browsering the internet and listening to music and have couple of other clients/apps running you might see a jump in the memory usage.
malisha1 said:
I agree with you but if you are a browsering the internet and listening to music and have couple of other clients/apps running you might see a jump in the memory usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, of course, but still not to the extent that we're talking about. I've never seen the memory usage on my HD2 over about 60%, and I use it very heavily.
Like I said, the (PC) Windows rules don't really apply to WM.
johncmolyneux said:
Yes, of course, but still not to the extent that we're talking about. I've never seen the memory usage on my HD2 over about 60%, and I use it very heavily.
Like I said, the (PC) Windows rules don't really apply to WM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess so, my professional exprience is working with windows server and unix mainframe systems. Which could be different from a phone architecture.
If anyone manages to max out the standard 448MB of RAM then i would like to know how the hell they managed it with winmo!
Probably this is a an old topic. I've read numerous post on weather this 576mb is real or just a trick and the logic behind it. Now it seems this is indeed a real thing but I couldn't find a good post comparing the increased ram vs the old one.
My question is does this actually improve the performance? If so, how come some chef here are still cooking not utilizing the increased ram? Or is it like many have said that releasing the hidden ram actually slow down a little due to the fact this "hidden" ram is exclusive used by certain process to speed up the system overall?
thanks
Well it doesn't increase the preformence since the 448 mb is al more than enough. It actually decrease the preformence a little bit but that is also depending on rom. So its only useful when you 15 apps running that together is using more than 150 mb of ram normally that never happens. So the hole trick is only useful for
-very very exclusive situations
-To show your friends he you see I got now 270 Mb free.
jan-willem3 said:
Well it doesn't increase the preformence since the 448 mb is al more than enough. It actually decrease the preformence a little bit but that is also depending on rom. So its only useful when you 15 apps running that together is using more than 150 mb of ram normally that never happens. So the hole trick is only useful for
-very very exclusive situations
-To show your friends he you see I got now 270 Mb free.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How come it decrease the performance?
I read somewhere on this forum that theextra ram is allocated for some graphics usage, and i think that this is what he means...
has anyone actually done some sort of bench mark comparing the increase ram vs stock one? Graphic test in particular.
No difference to minimal difference in graphic performances from user experience. It's not noticeable.
dashrink said:
I read somewhere on this forum that theextra ram is allocated for some graphics usage, and i think that this is what he means...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no the graphics 128 is already taken before the OS alocates the rest. You cant touch the graphics 128 even with the 576 hack.
When 576 is enabled, you still only have 448 to play with, just like when it is not enabled, and you have 448, you only really have 336 that you can use.
samsamuel said:
no the graphics 128 is already taken before the OS alocates the rest. You cant touch the graphics 128 even with the 576 hack.
When 576 is enabled, you still only have 448 to play with, just like when it is not enabled, and you have 448, you only really have 336 that you can use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Based on what you said, so the 576mb hack is really just displaying the numbers out? With this hack, even it shows 448mb available, you will get maxed out after 336mb. Is this what you are saying?
There is a thread some one made a 448mb page pool and HD2 can still boot up. Doesn't that mean the 448mb can be used freely if needed?
no, what i am saying is if you get a stock hd2, and look at the hardware info, it will show 448MB Ram total, and when you look at total program memory, it will say 336 (or there abouts)
Thats because there is 448 MB Ram, and 128 is taken by the graphics, leaving 336 for the system to use.
In contrast, if you activate the 576 hack, in hardware info it will show 576MB, and in total program memory it will show 448MB for the system to use.
Again, this is because the graphics takes 128MB
I just want to ask u all who think 576 is a trick a question, why do all the chefs here enable 576 in their roms? Are they not smart and intelligent enough, than most of us, to know that 576 is not a trick?
fantasytozi said:
I just want to ask u all who think 576 is a trick a question, why do all the chefs here enable 576 in their roms? Are they not smart and intelligent enough, than most of us, to know that 576 is not a trick?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have to use one of the T-Mobile US Base Roms and use certain radios to enable the hidden ram. Some chefs may use different base roms. It's not really a matter of deciding to enable it or not.... it just depends what base rom they want to use for their rom.
About that decrease wgere I am talking about it is something that windows have to adress more memory. Thats why it is slower. Well actually it isn't a very huge decrease.
Smaberg did create some rom with new base but have 448ram.
Let me quote some for u to read:
Abolisher2407 said:
After doing some research I have found out the following information :-
Windows Mobile 6.x is powered by Windows CE 5.2.
http://www.slideshare.net/abhisheksharma/windows-mobile-6
http://www.addlogic.se/articles/articles/windows-ce-6-memory-architecture.html
The memory architecture is divided in to 32 process slots. Each with a capacity of 32MB. However with a little testing of my own I have found that it is not possible to run more than approximately 11 applications similtaneously which equates to 28 processes running on my setup. The remaining (28 - 11) 17 processes are operating system specific processes such as the GWES.exe DLL's etc.
If you calculate the memory required for the max of 11 applications it is 352MB which explains why I never see the memory go above 300-330.
The advantage of having the extra memory (576MB) is possibly to allow the other 21 processes to run with more head room.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
g.lewarne said:
i am going to clear this up once and for all
1ghz hack = fake
576mb RAM = REAL as conclusively proved by advanced testing when it was first discovered, the fact that it comes as default whena tmous rom is flashed on a EU hd2, and my own testing (i built a rom wiht a 400mb pagepool and was able to sucessfully fill the remaining 50 odd mb of ram before the system gave out)
end of story
G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pongster said:
you're probably on a ROM whose Chef has chosen to differentiate their ROM from All the other ROM's whose Users actually benefit from the 576MB RAM that's there...
How do ALL the Chefs who Enable 576MB on their ROM's know this is NOT a trick? (Aside from the fact that there is nothing changed in the Registry to "Show" 576MB)
We tried creating a Pagepool of 448MB (on 576MB ROM's that's what's left after the 128MB is allocated for the Graphics etc.)... As you know, increasing the PagePool decreases available RAM...
by increasing this (PagePool) to 448MB, the ROM should not even Boot if the 576MB RAM is a "trick"... but it did boot... slowly and sluggishly... but it booted.
PagePool and 576MB RAM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am definitely believing the 576mb is real and just want to know the performance difference and reason why HTC wants to hide this part of ram
silvscorp said:
I am definitely believing the 576mb is real and just want to know the performance difference and reason why HTC wants to hide this part of ram
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there wont be a performance boost. Putting more petrol in a car doesnt make it go faster, and likewise more ram doesnt make a machine run faster UNLESS you are already maxing out the available ram, which none of us are.
Personally on roms with the hack, i use the extra memory to run a ramdisk with opera and system cache on it, and that gives a few benefits.
1 - when you soft reset it is wiped and rebuilt, so your cache folders dont fill up all your rom.
2 - Opera especially definately seems to run faster with the cache there. (especially compared to using the sd card for opera cache)
3 - you arent using rom or sd card space for teh cache folders.
as to why it was hidden, , , who knows? there have been a few tentative reports (nothing confirmed) of more echo/sound distortion in calls using the hack, so perhaps the radio utilises it? (I dont believe this myself, i see no difference between with/without 576 roms, but it has been put forward as a theory once or twice)
@ above me yeah that is correct
Maybe in the beginnning they got issues with it and they wanted to release it fast so they decided to give it 448 mb. This is very good possible since first roms only contain 320 mb of ram. Later they found out the bugs so the TMOUS version could released with 576 mb.