Hi all,
greeting from barcelona
I can not take any picture more than 0,5MB in the 2M (1600x1200) mode with my T-Mobile Wing.
do you know friends how can I setup the T-Mobile Wing to take a 2MB picture ??
tons of thanks
torrellesbcn
2 Megapixels does not mean that it will be a 2 megabyte photo. Also the format that the camera takes pictures in is compressed. That's why there's a difference...
A "2 megapixel" camera actually has 1.92x10^6 pixels (1600 * 1200) or 1.92 megapixels which means that the photo has nearly 2 million pixels in it. It is no indication of size. Most of the photos that come from a 2mp camera are ~500kb depending on light adjustments made by the camera.
Related
HTC Universal "was" initially sold as having a 1.3M camera!
As it is also written in the backside of all units.
However, newest ROMs allow to configure for taking 2M pictures!
Taken pictures, really have a 2M format (1600x1280).
Someone knows, if:
- Is it really 2M or it is interpolated?
- Was the camera sensor HW prepared for 2M, since the beginning?
interpolated
rather extrapolated...
interpolated
it IS interpolated at 2mp
Hi all,
wonder why nobody noticed this but.. have you ever tried to take a shot with the camera and then open it with your PC? The resolution is 1552x2592 (or the other way around in case of landscape shots) which is exactly 4.02Mpixel instead of 5.0
what do you think?
Maybe you didn't take the photo at the maximum resolution, because mine has 2592X1944 = 5038848 = 5 Mpíxels !!!
Try to change between widescreen photo and standard size. One of them is 4 MP and the other is 5 MP. I don't own a HD but I think I red it somewhere.
I think you are taking photos in widescreen
ehm.. yes jamief00.. I was taking photos in widescreen mode.. but I didn't tought that it would simply "cut" the exceeding pixels :| too bad.. well.. thank you
This has been covered in other threads!!!
This seams to be a common thing with cameras in general, I have a HD camcorder which obviously records video in widescreen. When it comes to taking stills the 4:3 pictures are higher resolution that the 16:9 pictures. It appears that the CMOS sensors are 4:3 and are clipped to give 16:9 rather than the other way round.
Anybody else notice this, the 8MP camera is noise as hell and in some cases (for me) distort the pic or shoots it blurry. Why is that? My 5MP on my HD2 is not noise at all. Is the Incredible camera noise as well (since im sure they are the same).
More megapixels doesn't equal higher image quality, I think this is what you're forgetting. It's just from HTC, they do process the hell out of the images taken from the camera and it's not enhanced by Kodak or Carl Zeiss. If it did have efforts from them I would be very disappointed. I really want to see how good the 12 megapixel camera on the Nokia N8 looks. Maybe we can have a benchmark.... it's still a phone afterall.
Post a pic with the noise you are talking about. What ISO setting are you using? AUTO?
Also what kind of lighting are you under?
This is a phone camera after all. The MP is just marketing.
how to import picture from EVO into the PC the pics are saved into the Phone not into SD
advice please
why don't you just email it to yourself?
rutter9 said:
why don't you just email it to yourself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I cannot email 200 Pics to myself
Raadius said:
Anybody else notice this, the 8MP camera is noise as hell and in some cases (for me) distort the pic or shoots it blurry. Why is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on your ISO settings. Your previous phone might not have had the issue because the EVO can go all the way up to 1250 ISO, while most other phones cannot go above 800. Its good to have options.
I would suggest to turn off auto ISO. If its dark, change your ISO to a high setting. If your in a lot of light, lower your ISO.
Even though 800-1250 ISO might be noisy, it can take sharper low light photos.
I doubt that the image sensor for this phone is not physically bigger than the 5mp one in the Hero. To fit 8 million pixels into the same physical space that 5 million pixels inhabit on the hero means that each pixel has to be smaller. Smaller things have less surface area and thus are less sensitive to light. To counteract this loss of light sensitivity they have to amplify the light that they receive and this causes more grain. Again, this is all assuming that the sensors are physically the same size. Most compact cameras have used the same size chip physically for years but adding pixels year after year. Eventually you get diminishing returns in quality because of the extra grain. This is why compact cameras don't have 30 mega pixels now, they reached the max where things just get worse if they go higher.
Set iso to 100
Amazing
Becouse there is no optical zoom on HD2 my guess is that when i take 5MP picture with MAX ZOOM it will take part of 5MP picture and strech it to 5MP thus losing the quality.
What if i take 1MP picture with MAX ZOOM. Will it take 5MP picture and cut only 1MP portion. Or will it take 1MP picture than than strech part of it as zoom resulting in really bad quality.
Can anyone understand me and answer me how is zoom done on low-res pictures like 1MP on Android.
No answers. Does anyone at least understand my question????
This is mainly software question and im not sure how camera software take care of zoom on low res pictures.
your first assumption is correct: the digital zoomed image is obtained by cropping the full picture. As for the question about the different quality on picture taken, let's say, at 5mp or 1mp: i'm not totally sure but as far as i know on a digital camera the sensor will always work at the max resolution, only after that the cpu will scale the picture according to the user choice, applying at the same time a compression algorythm. So i believe the phone will take the photo at 5mp (zoomed, not actually 5mp - cropped) then the scaling process will occur, resulting a 1mp picture. The final quality will not be amazing but still acceptable.
HI. I was cleaning my drawer today and was trying to clean up the mess in my drawer and found one of my old cameras, Canon Power Shot A560!
it is a mid budget and mid range camera and i got that about 2 years ago
well it is still working! btw its made in Malaysia, thanks to canon for that!
lets come to the point.
A560 has a 7.1 MP sensor, resolution of 3072 × 2304 and the size of the sensor is 1/2.5" CCD.
While the Galaxy S III has an 8 MP sensor, resolution of 3264x2448 and its sensor has aperture of F/2.6.
I have also added my all time love, my Samsung Wave to the test.
Wave has a two year old 5 MP camera with 30 fps HD video recording capability and still resolution of 2560x1920 and its also equipped with decent flash.
i was just considering a head to head challenge between A560 and Galaxy S III and also my Wave. i got some of the photos and found the following results.
u can clearly see that the images produced by A560 seem to be more Noise Free and more soothing than those of S3. S3 produces more sharper and more accurate color images. Wave on the other hand, proves to be the most successful out of all three considering its low Megapixel count and its quite old camera sensor. its images have the most real white balance and the colors are more natural and real to life. but the detail it captures is where it stands last.
U can also notice that the flash power of Canon A560 is somewhat more than that of S3's flash.
but in Macro mode, S 3 is the king!
I just got very few images and its night time so all of the images have been I taken in artificial lightening which is the most hard time for any camera to show its true power!
P.S: image order is that the first image is of S3, then A560 and then Wave. three sets each
pls comment with sincerity and dont troll cause that would not help no one!
PEACE
Nice comparison
aami.aami said:
HI. I was cleaning my drawer today and was trying to clean up the mess in my drawer and found one of my old cameras, Canon Power Shot A560!
it is a mid budget and mid range camera and i got that about 2 years ago
well it is still working! btw its made in Malaysia, thanks to canon for that!
lets come to the point.
A560 has a 7.1 MP sensor, resolution of 3072 × 2304 and the size of the sensor is 1/2.5" CCD.
While the Galaxy S III has an 8 MP sensor, resolution of 3264x2448 and its sensor has aperture of F/2.6.
I have also added my all time love, my Samsung Wave to the test.
Wave has a two year old 5 MP camera with 30 fps HD video recording capability and still resolution of 2560x1920 and its also equipped with decent flash.
i was just considering a head to head challenge between A560 and Galaxy S III and also my Wave. i got some of the photos and found the following results.
u can clearly see that the images produced by A560 seem to be more Noise Free and more soothing than those of S3. S3 produces more sharper and more accurate color images. Wave on the other hand, proves to be the most successful out of all three considering its low Megapixel count and its quite old camera sensor. its images have the most real white balance and the colors are more natural and real to life. but the detail it captures is where it stands last.
U can also notice that the flash power of Canon A560 is somewhat more than that of S3's flash.
but in Macro mode, S 3 is the king!
I just got very few images and its night time so all of the images have been I taken in artificial lightening which is the most hard time for any camera to show its true power!
P.S: image order is that the first image is of S3, then A560 and then Wave. three sets each
pls comment with sincerity and dont troll cause that would not help no one!
PEACE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
to me the s3 looks more icandy i would say that it can EASILY out gun a compact camera like that
the flash on the s3 is LED on the compact camera im guessing a zenon?
paintball23456 said:
to me the s3 looks more icandy i would say that it can EASILY out gun a compact camera like that
the flash on the s3 is LED on the compact camera im guessing a zenon?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No the flash of the A560 is not xenon. its just ordinary flash. it is not even led flash. its a 4 year Canon PowerShot man! but i am really impressed with it now!