Can someone please tell me what the actual dimensions (h x w) are for the screen on the Ameo/Advantage/Athena?
Thanks!
Was my question that tough? Or too elementary?
5" Diagonal, 80x100mm
Thank you zoharbl. The 5 inches I knew. It was the 80 x 100 (3.15" x 3.94"), that I was after. To me that is much more usable than the 1.57" x 3.54" of the E90.
Related
Please could someone categorically say what dimensions the Universal has.
I have seen two sets of varying dimensions. Which ones are correct?
http://www.eprice.com.tw/news/?news_id=2913
http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=125564
ONE: MM (Inches) Length: 127.7 (5.03) Width: 81.0 (3.19) Depth: 25.0 (0.98) (That is THICK!)
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
Two Reports of Weight: g. (oz.): 270.0 (9.52) or 210.0 (7.41)
Also, anybody have some close-up size comparison pics with a Himalaya or Blue Angel, in particular, thickness?
Thanks.
Squuiid said:
Please could someone categorically say what dimensions the Universal has.
I have seen two sets of varying dimensions. Which ones are correct?
http://www.eprice.com.tw/news/?news_id=2913
http://www.expansys.com/product.asp?code=125564
ONE: MM (Inches) Length: 127.7 (5.03) Width: 81.0 (3.19) Depth: 25.0 (0.98) (That is THICK!)
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
Two Reports of Weight: g. (oz.): 270.0 (9.52) or 210.0 (7.41)
Also, anybody have some close-up size comparison pics with a Himalaya or Blue Angel, in particular, thickness?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK - here's what happened.
Official specs were released by HTC - and propogated by T-mobile. These gave the dimensions as 131.6 x 79 x 21.6 mm and a weight of 210g.
Later these specs were revised and now T-mobile, Orange and O2 all give the dimensions as 127.7 x 81 x 25 mm.
An O2 Powerpoint presentation was leaked that gave the weight as 270g. Now, however, O2, T-mobile and Orange all give the weight as 285g.
Until someone actually measures and weighs it in a review, therefore it is:
127.7 x 81 x 25 mm and 285g according to all trustworthy official sources.
The full known specs are given in the VGA Comparison page linked in my sig at the bottom of my post.
Nope, I've just measured mine and it is:
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
aadvark said:
Nope, I've just measured mine and it is:
TWO: MM (Inches) Length: 131.6 (5.18) Width: 79.0 (3.11) Depth: 21.6 (0.85)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That woud make the original specs provided by HTC correct (in terms of dimensions at least). Which makes one wonder where they got the second set of specs from?
Not sure if this site was posted in the past but here is a comparison of the Universal.
http://www.windowsmobile.no/modules...ame=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
JW
Not sure if this site was posted in the past but here is a comparison of the Universal.
http://www.windowsmobile.no/modules...ame=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
JW
Thanks buddy! Just what I was after.
Looks pretty damn big! :shock:
Think my Himalaya is the max size I will go for in a phone.
The Universal looks too THICK.
I agree. I'm waiting for the Wizard so see how big that is. If I couldn't cope with that no way I'd have a Universal, especially at the price it is.
Here are the images of the Wizard. I agree it looks better as far as size but the processor scares me.
http://www.windowsmobile.no/modules...e=article&sid=443&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
OMG it looks HUGE ! i think they have made a mistake with this one, Good specs but i think its far too big to be practical.
I Own an XDA 2i and that is deffo the biggest phone i have ever had, i have just got used to the size in fact, so there is no way i would go bigger.
On a good note though ... the Wizard looks really interesting, i like the small size of that, more my cup of tea lol, we'll just have to see what the processor performs like
Noooooooo!
i-mate are reporting it as being:
Dimension (Typical): 81mm x 127.7mm x 25mm
http://www.clubimate.com/t-JASJAR_technical.aspx
Can it really be that big/fat?
I thought we had established it as being 21.6mm
I notice the screen resolution is actually higher than 640 x 480 because you can tell when a LCD is running at its native resolution or not. The image should be bright and crispy. I also have a friend who told me the same thing that our Athena should be 800 x ???, anyone can confirm that?
I see Sharp can support 800 x ??? for their upcoming PDA phone, so it is possible that HTC's next upgrade is taking us to 800 X 600?? Anyone can confirm that, too?
benzman said:
I notice the screen resolution is actually higher than 640 x 480 because you can tell when a LCD is running at its native resolution or not. The image should be bright and crispy. I also have a friend who told me the same thing that our Athena should be 800 x ???, anyone can confirm that?
I see Sharp can support 800 x ??? for their upcoming PDA phone, so it is possible that HTC's next upgrade is taking us to 800 X 600?? Anyone can confirm that, too?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am sure it's only 640 x 480; although the image looks sharp and beautiful on Athena, but that's just because it has a better screen, the resolution is only 640 x 480, you can see that if you compare to Universal, the font on Athena actually look unclear and have edges compare to Universal. They both have the same resolution, but Athena's screen is bigger so that's why you see the edges
Has anyone seen the specs comparing the thickness of the Epic to the other Galaxy phones? I'm just wondering how much the keyboard adds.
Thanks!
I read 4mm.
edit: Actually that's not right. Its 4mm larger than the evo. Sorry.
Remember that the 4g radio is also probably adding some size to the phone.
Size: Dimensions: 4.9 inches 2.54 inches x 0.56 inches (124.8 mm x 64.6 mm x 14.2 mm) (LxWxT)
Weight: 5.46 ounces (155 grams)
versus
SIZE Dimensions 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 mm
Weight 119 g
So about an extra 4mm for the keyboard, and 35 grams.
Not terrible, and it is still in line with other smartphones, but if you want a 4" display and a landscape slider, you have to pay for it somehow.
drizek said:
Size: Dimensions: 4.9 inches 2.54 inches x 0.56 inches (124.8 mm x 64.6 mm x 14.2 mm) (LxWxT)
Weight: 5.46 ounces (155 grams)
versus
SIZE Dimensions 122.4 x 64.2 x 9.9 mm
Weight 119 g
So about an extra 4mm for the keyboard, and 35 grams.
Not terrible, and it is still in line with other smartphones, but if you want a 4" display and a landscape slider, you have to pay for it somehow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Just wondering how it compares to my old Tilt2.
dc41 said:
Agreed. Just wondering how it compares to my old Tilt2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tilt2 dimensions:
116 x 59.2 x 17.3 mm. Weight, 178.5 g
I know it's got a 7" display, but what's the exact dimensions (height x length) of the display...?
Thx.
Nevermind found an answer...
http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com...-are-the-actual-screen-dimensions/td-p/736077
The screen itself is 6.25 x 3.75 approximately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@ 169ppi 1024x600 = 3.55x6.059 inch
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/nookcolor/features/techspecs/index.asp?cds2Pid=35607
----edit----
i did the sizing in photoshop.
thx.......
Okay, so I came across this article about the dream smartphone. Basically, it lists all the specs a dream smartphone of 2014 will have.
The Dream Smartphone Specifications:
Display (Screen): 5.2-inch AMOLED 1080 x 1920 pixels (424 ppi)
Camera: 16 MP, 5312 x 2988 pixels, f/2.2, OIS, iPhone image processing (5 MP Front)
Performance: Snapdragon 810 (8core, 64bit), Adreno 430, 3 GB of Ram
Battery: 3500 mAh with Motorola Turbo Charging
Speakers: Dual Front-facing stereo speakers
Design: 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.37 inch (146.4 x 70.6 x 9.4 mm)
Operating System: Android 5.0 Lollipop
I personally would go for a bigger display with the same dimensions if possible. Bigger 4000mAh battery would be nice too.
Source
What are your dream specs for a smartphone?