I recently bought an HTC Trinity also known as P3600.
I installed TCPMP and launch video. Of course I got the problem with Imageon and switched to raw framebuffer.
Image quality was OK (although compression artefacts are more visible on trinity than Wizard) but performance seemed low.
So I ran benchmarks and surprisingly the trinity (cpu= 400Mhz) is much slower than my wizard (cpu= 225 Mhz).
I get 118% for trinity and 152% for wizard for the same movie and the same parameters for TCPMP 0.71.
What can be the explaination???
My HP 4350 with cpu 400 Mhz is well above 250% for this movie...
This makes no sense for me. It's like my wizard is running 200 Mhz. Or maybe Samsung processor is crap but I read somewhere it is good.
below are test results (I stopped them after 30 seconds because it is not necessary to bench the whole movie to see there is a problem)
for trinity:
TCPMP Version 0.72RC1 Benchmark Results
Average Speed 118.48%
Video Frames 943
Audio Samples 1701539
Amount of Data 2883 KB
Bench. Time 0:31.835
Bench. Frame Rate 29.62
Bench. Sample Rate 53447
Bench. Data Rate 742 kbit/s
Original Time 0:37.719
Original Frame Rate 25.00
Original Sample Rate 44100
Original Data Rate 626 kbit/s
URL \Carte de stockage\My Videos\Beur.Blanc.Rouge.FRENCHDRip.XviD-LOST-LuCiFeR_PocketPC.avi
Size 306622884
Platform PocketPC
OS Version 5.01
OEM Info TRIN10000
Clock speed 397 Mhz
Video output Raw FrameBuffer 240x320 16bits Lookup
Video zoom 320x240 -> 240x320
Audio output Wave Output 44100Hz 16Bits 2Ch.
and for wizard
TCPMP Version 0.72RC1 Benchmark Results
Average Speed 152.09%
Video Frames 932
Audio Samples 1687459
Amount of Data 2848 KB
Bench. Time 0:24.511
Bench. Frame Rate 38.02
Bench. Sample Rate 68842
Bench. Data Rate 952 kbit/s
Original Time 0:37.279
Original Frame Rate 25.00
Original Sample Rate 44100
Original Data Rate 626 kbit/s
URL \Storage Card\My Videos\Beur.Blanc.Rouge.FRENCHDRip.XviD-LOST-LuCiFeR_PocketPC.avi
Size 306622884
Platform PocketPC
OS Version 5.01
OEM Info WIZA200
Clock speed 225 Mhz
Video output Raw FrameBuffer 240x320 16bits Lookup
Video zoom 320x240 -> 240x320
Audio output Wave Output 44100Hz 16Bits 2Ch.
meroupow said:
I recently bought an HTC Trinity also known as P3600.
I installed TCPMP and launch video. Of course I got the problem with Imageon and switched to raw framebuffer.
Image quality was OK (although compression artefacts are more visible on trinity than Wizard) but performance seemed low.
So I ran benchmarks and surprisingly the trinity (cpu= 400Mhz) is much slower than my wizard (cpu= 225 Mhz).
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. I have seen benchmarks for the Omap processor that showed very good graphics performance, even better than much faster processors because of a separate accelerator inside the chip, maybe that is the reason, or maybe TCPMP is just not optimized to use the new Samsung processor to its maximum potential.
Related
See my test reuslt
Play same file at same card.
I update my MDA pro with Jassar rom or dopod 900 asian WWE,but it is slow too.
It cann't play skyforce at normal speed too.
Why?
x50v
TCPMP Version 0.72RC1 Benchmark Results
Average Speed 148.02%
Video Frames 979
Audio Samples 1496401
Amount of Data 4535 KB
Bench. Time 0:22.046
Bench. Frame Rate 44.41
Bench. Sample Rate 67874
Bench. Data Rate 1.7 Mbit/s
Original Time 0:32.633
Original Frame Rate 30.00
Original Sample Rate 44100
Original Data Rate 1.1 Mbit/s
URL \SD Card\[pda][0640x0480][kannagi_op][1100].avi
Size 14728190
Platform PocketPC
OS Version 5.01
OEM Info Dell Axim X50v
Clock speed 624 Mhz
Video output Intel 2700G 480x640 16bits
Video zoom 640x480 -> 480x640
Audio output Wave Output 44100Hz 16Bits 2Ch.
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
dopod 900
TCPMP Version 0.72RC1 Benchmark Results
Average Speed 67.98%
Video Frames 710
Audio Samples 1083527
Amount of Data 3372 KB
Bench. Time 0:34.815
Bench. Frame Rate 20.39
Bench. Sample Rate 31122
Bench. Data Rate 793 kbit/s
Original Time 0:23.666
Original Frame Rate 30.00
Original Sample Rate 44100
Original Data Rate 1.2 Mbit/s
URL \Storage Card\[pda][0640x0480][kannagi_op][1100].avi
Size 14728190
Platform PocketPC
OS Version 5.01
OEM Info PU10
Clock speed 523 Mhz
Video output DirectDraw 480x640 16bits
Video zoom 640x480 -> 480x640
Audio output Wave Output 44100Hz 16Bits 2Ch.
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
dopod 900 with PERFORMANCETWEAKHIGHRESOURCES.cab
TCPMP Version 0.72RC1 Benchmark Results
Average Speed 76.22%
Video Frames 723
Audio Samples 1104685
Amount of Data 3442 KB
Bench. Time 0:31.619
Bench. Frame Rate 22.87
Bench. Sample Rate 34936
Bench. Data Rate 892 kbit/s
Original Time 0:24.099
Original Frame Rate 30.00
Original Sample Rate 44100
Original Data Rate 1.2 Mbit/s
URL \Storage Card\[pda][0640x0480][kannagi_op][1100].avi
Size 14728190
Platform PocketPC
OS Version 5.01
OEM Info PU10
Clock speed 524 Mhz
Video output DirectDraw 640x480 16bits
Video zoom 640x480 -> 640x480
Audio output Wave Output 44100Hz 16Bits 2Ch.
Re: Dopod 900 is very very slow in playback video or play ga
Hi,
Sorry i havent looked through all your results - but in connection with Skyforce.
You need to make sure you've got v1.22 anything below and the game is unplayable on the jasjar/m5000 etc.
I have quite a few game installed and all seem to run ok - the ones that dont are normally not wm5 optimised.
Matt
I would like to know which software allows me to benchmark my prophet in terms of CPU speed etc. to make sure it runs as fast as it should. I would really appreaciate if some of you could post some results along with the software used.
It would be interesting.
Cheers!
BenchMark
Just use TCPMP v0.71 and benchmark with the included Nature MP4 file.
mine's clocked at 250Mhz.
Average Speed 207.24%
Video Frames 202
Audio Samples 181716
Amount of Data 182 KB
Bench Time 0.06.562
Bench. Frame Rate 30.78
Bench Sample Rate 27688
Bench Data Rate 228 kbit/s
Original Time 0.13.600
Orginal Frame Rate 14.85
Original Sample Rate 8000
Original Data Rate 110 kbit/s
buyaoxiao, can you post benchmark data without overclocking the CPU so that we can compare performances?
from emule
video code------xvid
video quality----1250kb/s
resolution-------672×272
audio code------AC3
audio birates----372kb/s
yes with last coreplayer build .....
yup
Coreplayer will play it.
But the question he asked was...'smoothly' and in my experience it would be no. The bitrate is waaay too high on both the video and the audio, I would say you'd run a benchmark against that file and get it running at about 85%
yes, I mean "smoothly"!
anybody can give a real test?
This was with an 512*384 Xvid movie:
Average speed: 83.66%
Bench. frame rate: 20.059
Bench. sample rate: 40581
Bench. data rate: 1.86 Mbit/s
Orig. frame rate: 23.967
Orig. sample rate: 48000
Orig. data rate: 2.23 Mbit/s
Hell no ! (said with Will Smith voice). If Core player can play the file specified by the OP i'll throw my x1 out the frigging window.
Hey, I just tried what the Leo can REALLY play back! Since there is a 1008x1008 restriction in coreplayer the maximum res. we cannot test divX 720p.
Running the latest HD2O Rom with all common Tweaks.
Here my benchmarks:
Running HD2O Rom
SinCity Trailer 960:528 DivX 1.35Mbit/s @ 25FPS
Audio : 128Kbit/s real Stereo
44 KhZ
Results (Coreplayer v.1.3.6):
Average Speed: 123,37%
Bench. Datarate: 1.67Mbit/s
Results (TCPMP v.0.72):
Average Speed: 79.03%
Bench. Datarate: 1.1Mbit/s
Hi guys,
I'm curious how to encode a video for playback on SG3 to achieve best visual and audio output and keep the lowest battery consumption. So, what do you recommend:
Video:
resolution
codec
fps
bit rate
etc
Audio:
codec
sample rate
bit rate
CBR / VBR
etc
SG3 display resolution is 240x400 but I found on official samsung site that (best or recommended or ?) resolution for playback is 720x480.
Thx for any advice
Resolution/codec/bitrate: SD (720x480 or less)
- if you download an XVID film or series (and the size doesn't matter) you can directly play it from inbuilt media player.
Audio: I suggest MP3 CBR 320kpbs, or MP4A VBR at highest quality, MP4 produces better quality and supported by most popular media players.
Codec:
xvid - good quality, and less CPU usage
h264 - good quality, smaller size, but more cpu usage.
FPS: use the source values (if your movie is 25fps and want to convert to reduce size etc. use 25 fps)
Bit-rate: depends on SD-card speed, most of XVID movies are @1000 kbps, maximally use 1500 kbps I think it's enough.
Sample Rate: 44100 Hz is standard CD quality, 48000 Hz is DVD quality, I think you will not hear any difference.