Which do you think I should buy?
Which is best?
What are the glitches of the XDA IIi?
Hope you can help make my decision...
Cheers,
Rich
hey~~~ must be xda IIi~~~~~
the most powerful PPC phone~~~
XDAIIs having keyboard, usefull when you type a message with one hand.
Rom XDAIIi biger = 128Mb
XDAIIs = 64Mb
XDAIIi design like XDAII
which one's is your.
I prefer XDAIIs.
If you still can wait upto next few month.. wait for XDA IV..
If you still can wait upto next few month.. wait for XDA IV..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it seems that the outlook of XDA IIi / s is better than IV....
I like the look of the XDA11s with it's nice black finish and pull out keyboard - but i was won over on the XDA11s specs, and i couldn't be happier using it as a wireless modem at the minute with my laptop typing this in the garden.
I like the look of the XDA11s with it's nice black finish and pull out keyboard
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To Foxman: yes..the outlook of IIs is just cool.....but I am using II...and want to change eith IIi or IIs..if I buy a IIi...I can use the II battery.....but I like the ourlook of IIs..that's why I still think which one I should buy
I have XDAII and I still find IIi features better.
IIi is for power and IIs is for look.
But the most important still ROM support from this forum.
If there is a upgrade for IIi to WM2005, I will go for IIi now.
lolx if you see the video of bill gates about the WM2005 youll see that all the microsft staff are using himalaya XDA IV.. prety cool.. im jelous i wanna go find a job to microsft..
outlook?
outlook as in the program ?
outlook as in the style and look of the device
outlook as in the ability to be able to get ones hands on one of those devices ?
Hello,
I used to own an XDAIIs and now I have the XDAIIi. I beleive the XDAIIi is a better pocket pc/phone in all aspects. The XDAIIs is heavier, slower processor, and very easy to break because it has a sliding keyboard which tends to become loose also. The XDAIIi has it all better than the XDAIIs except if you want a keyboard.
Bohs
I started with a XDA then a XDA2 then i tried the 2s and had 4 of them all the same crappy bluetooth, i now have the 2i and find it works ok, plus i did have some spair batteries and stuf from the old XDA2 that that was good
also like Rutgar what do you mean by outlook is better in the 2s
JOhn
I think outlook means "appearance", or "the looks" if you read sunlight's posts.
XDAIIi
:roll: i really wna know how much is the XDAIIi in the philippines and where can i get it.... hope they will allow monthly installment hehehehheheh :wink:
Dude XDA II mini here in pinas worth 38000 pesos and IIs is 48000 pesos expect 60000 for IIi and 100000 for IV..
Wow, that's how expensive XDA back at home? There were quite a bit in Ebay (UK) & the price were cheaper too but I'm not sure if they would ship it back there (Philippines).
Back to forum's question, I'll still go for XDA2i, mainly because of faster processing speed & in my opinion, almost all (not the keyboard from XDA2s of course) features of previous XDA's were in it. I haven't read about XDA4 but I hope it's as good as XDA2i.
Oneil :roll:
Hi!
As owner of a Qtek 9090 i wonder if I should go for the 9000 now?
Reason I ask is I have been a bit disapointet with the 9090, mostly because of the bad hardware etc.
I know with the 9000 the only "new" stuff i get is 3G, better Camera, faster processor and Win 05.. and thats fine.
But is it worth buying? and is the hardware better? Will I bee disapointet as a 9090 owner or what?
Hope to hear you oppinions since its seems that people in here has the pretty much the same opinions as me..
Thank you!
we all know that there will be no wm5 4 magicin nd blueangel has already + qwert keypad and i think it is cheaper than jam ...................it just that bit is big can any body recommend any other solution or tell how well ba performs compared to mini
Yup the BA got a leaked WM5 test rom & Magician will never get WM5, but BA is more expensive. Not sure about second hand prices though.
I personally like the magician design much more & would go for a wizard, charmer etc instead of a BA.
For spec comparison you can visit the wiki, there's a lot of info there,
M
oltp said:
Yup the BA got a leaked WM5 test rom & Magician will never get WM5, but BA is more expensive. Not sure about second hand prices though.
I personally like the magician design much more & would go for a wizard, charmer etc instead of a BA.
For spec comparison you can visit the wiki, there's a lot of info there,
M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how can be ba expensive than mini caz mini is newer accorrdin 2 gsmarena....wizard is too much costly nad charmer if i am not wrong is the jam black with wm2k3..........cam on ba is vga and that on mini is 1.3 and i think there is any difference as both stink......how is performance of wm5 on ba can we use all buttons,camera and one handed operation as supported by wm5
oltp said:
I personally like the magician design much more & would go for a wizard, charmer etc instead of a BA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, but I wouldn't be recommend a Charmer (though I had it) as it seems that (after a while in this forum) the number of users are limited. Go for a Wizard (if you like keyboard, but it seems that it gives problems), or a Prophet.
hanmin said:
I agree, but I wouldn't be recommend a Charmer (though I had it) as it seems that (after a while in this forum) the number of users are limited. Go for a Wizard (if you like keyboard, but it seems that it gives problems), or a Prophet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it's just the simple fact that T-Mobile (don't know about other operators) is selling the Wizard, but not the Charmers accounts for difference in the amount of users. It seems like a good device though.
Regards, M
oltp said:
Maybe it's just the simple fact that T-Mobile (don't know about other operators) is selling the Wizard, but not the Charmers accounts for difference in the amount of users. It seems like a good device though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems that MDA Compact 2 is the only Charmer around. If that
s the case, as with probability concept, chances of number of users on Charmer will be naturally smaller.
BTW, what do you mean by T-Mobile is selling the Wizard, not the Charmer?
Ok, apparently TMO is selling different devices in the world. Here in the Netherlands they sell the Wizard, Universal & one or two of the HTC smartphones.
Sorry my mistake, but if the MDA Compact II is the only one it won't be a large seller.
oltp said:
Ok, apparently TMO is selling different devices in the world. Here in the Netherlands they sell the Wizard, Universal & one or two of the HTC smartphones.
Sorry my mistake, but if the MDA Compact II is the only one it won't be a large seller.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
any body not intersted in ba plz i want to exchange my mini with a ba can anybody tell how well wm5 works on ba and 1 more thing does bluetooth on newer pdas like mini stins caz it it is tooooooooo slow in my case (maybe caz of ms stock)
max414 said:
how can be ba expensive than mini caz mini is newer accorrdin 2 gsmarena....wizard is too much costly nad charmer if i am not wrong is the jam black with wm2k3..........cam on ba is vga and that on mini is 1.3 and i think there is any difference as both stink......how is performance of wm5 on ba can we use all buttons,camera and one handed operation as supported by wm5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I upgraded from magician to BA 2 months ago. interestingly, the VGA camera on BA is a lot better than magician's 1.3 M. Speed is same on both devices(magician uses more advanced pxa 272 while BA uses pxa 260). keyboard is ok(not great like universal though). Battery life is bad compared to magician. Wi-fi inclusion is great. BT is better too(widcomm)
kdskamal said:
max414 said:
how can be ba expensive than mini caz mini is newer accorrdin 2 gsmarena....wizard is too much costly nad charmer if i am not wrong is the jam black with wm2k3..........cam on ba is vga and that on mini is 1.3 and i think there is any difference as both stink......how is performance of wm5 on ba can we use all buttons,camera and one handed operation as supported by wm5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I upgraded from magician to BA 2 months ago. interestingly, the VGA camera on BA is a lot better than magician's 1.3 M. Speed is same on both devices(magician uses more advanced pxa 272 while BA uses pxa 260). keyboard is ok(not great like universal though). Battery life is bad compared to magician. Wi-fi inclusion is great. BT is better too(widcomm)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok u helped a lot since ur a ba user can u share ur experience on wm5 for ba and alo the size compared to mini ...........and if u tell that it is costly than mini or not
max414 said:
ok u helped a lot since ur a ba user can u share ur experience on wm5 for ba and alo the size compared to mini ...........and if u tell that it is costly than mini or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
size-wise..its a mammoth, but, on the other hand, i can do a lot of work on it. On mini, the small screen prevented me from doing some serious work on it. eyes used to get tired easily(i am just 18 ). wm5 on BA is ok..tuma 1.4 has brought some problems, but, tuma 1.3 still works for many of the users.
i have reverted back to wm2003SE, because of speed(2003SE is like 40% faster than wm5), memory(128mb(ram)+44mb(storage)+13mb(ext rom)=185mb !!) compared to wm5 ba which has only 44+13 mb memory(which is still greater than universal, wizard)..he he
wm5 is good on BA, all-in-all
kdskamal said:
max414 said:
ok u helped a lot since ur a ba user can u share ur experience on wm5 for ba and alo the size compared to mini ...........and if u tell that it is costly than mini or not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
size-wise..its a mammoth, but, on the other hand, i can do a lot of work on it. On mini, the small screen prevented me from doing some serious work on it. eyes used to get tired easily(i am just 18 ). wm5 on BA is ok..tuma 1.4 has brought some problems, but, tuma 1.3 still works for many of the users.
i have reverted back to wm2003SE, because of speed(2003SE is like 40% faster than wm5), memory(128mb(ram)+44mb(storage)+13mb(ext rom)=185mb !!) compared to wm5 ba which has only 44+13 mb memory(which is still greater than universal, wizard)..he he
wm5 is good on BA, all-in-all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all info from u was quite helpful .....since u upgraded from mini can u tell it is expensive than mini or not and what if we compare this mamooth(ba) with new wm5 phones like universal and k jam .......not jamin caz it is tiny like jam
max414 said:
all info from u was quite helpful .....since u upgraded from mini can u tell it is expensive than mini or not and what if we compare this mamooth(ba) with new wm5 phones like universal and k jam .......not jamin caz it is tiny like jam
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is ard $70-80 dollars expensive than mini. Universal has its own share of problems. But, it is completly different product IMHO. On the other hand, K-jam is not at all mammoth size. It just a bit too think(almost similar width as of universal). If you seek for similar size as that of mini, go in for jamin(imate) or Atom(o2)
I'm thinking about buy a Qtek 9000 in the next few days...
What is the opinion of who own one of these? You like it?
Good Features/Fast ... ?
I'm looking for a good windows mobile.
Thanks all
No one can tell me anything about this fone?
This whole forum is about this fone (or it's variants). It big, bulky and extremly useful.
Please excuse the extreme noob question, but that's what I am!
I'm considering buying an mwg atom life, is this something different to the O2 atom that many people are mentioning or is it more or less the same device but the O2 version has it's own custom ROM?
As a more general question, would other MWG atom life users recommend this? Is there anything I should be aware of?
To me it looks to offer most of the features of many other WM6 phones with the exception of GPS, (which is a big miss for me but I guess I can use bluetooth GPS) but whilst other phones retail around £400, this is available at £150 meaning I can actually afford it!! I really wanted the tytnII but it's out of my reach sadly. Is it a question of getting what you pay for?
edit-
I've done some more research and now understand the atom life's O2 heritage, but I've also discovered the Atom V which is not much more expensive and does include GPS (at the cost of a slower processor and less flash memory). Can any user of the Atom V tell me about the performance of the GPS - is it actually any good or would I be better off with a bluetooth GPS receiver anyway?