EDGE/Wi-Fi/USB speed-wise, a direct comparison of ROM/radio versions 1.5.4.2/01.12.10, 1.6.7.1/01.13.10 and the leaked 2.8.7.1/01.13.10 has been published at http://www.pocketpcmag.com/blogs/index.php?blog=3&p=518&more=1 – feel free to check it out.
Related
I've noticed several people mentioning during the last few days that they have devices with 1.18.x.x and 1.19.x.x roms.
Even HTC's "Hang" update mentioned it being compatible with all roms lower then 1.19.x.x
So, any downloads available for WWE 1.18 and 1.19 roms?
I would sure love to see what changed and if performance is even more increased.
I did however notice that more new HD users are having strange software problems that my HD that I received early november didn't have.
So are the new roms worse?
Please someone, anyone, share the new roms so the more advanced users can hack away at them.
There are so many threads out there with different versions of the Opera Mobile 9.5 beta... So which version of Opera Mobile 9.5 is the latest and greatest?
look in general section
here
There is always a new latest build every month or even every several days some times. Since chefs here continue to port newer builds from new device releases. of different brands of WM devices.
But if you are talking about greatest, the answer is simply NO.
Maybe you can find a build best fits your own device with your specific ROM, but there is no best for all.
Generally speaking, newer builds should be better than older ones, since Opera engineers keep fixing all bugs they found and keep making efforts to enhance the perfomance of Opera Mobile. But chances are you always need some DIY work to make any build of Opera Mobile to fulfile your own requirement, which depends on you device, your rom, and your personal preference.
Refer to my own experience on making Build#16277 to best perform on my QVGA TYTN II with a WM6.5 ROM, I posted it here.
See Engadget, Gizmodo, or any of your favorite gadget sites.
Many of the reviewers mentioned about speed and camera improvement over the European Hero. As we know, these are the two notable improvements brought about by the new rom update.
One exception is Engadget's review though, where Joshua mentioned no noticeable improvement in speed over the European Hero (with old rom). Upon asking, he told me that the version number on his review unit is 1.22.651.1, which indicates that it doesn't have the new rom installed (new rom has version number 2.xx.xxx.x). He also mentioned that the firmware version of his review unit is 1.5, i.e. NOT 1.6 Donut.
This is puzzling. I thought CDMA got supported only starting in 1.6. OK, I know the logic, 1.6 spots CDMA supports doesn't mean that 1.5 can't have CDMA support. It's just that, if that's the case, why call this a new feature of the 1.6 firmware?
1.6 is out since yesterday ... don´t think that the new Hero has it, or am I wrong?
Greets, Ro.
I've been looking around the whole evening and many threads don't even say if it has bugs (finger print unusable, camera app closes...). I wonder if some of you are using a rom that is closest to the latest versions or Samsung models.
I'm willing to change from 5.1 Nameless, and see what advantages bring the newer versions. So please, lend me a hand with the information available.
Hi Folks,
I've noticed that on every SW update (ASBA, ASCA, etc.) the guys from samsung are releasing a new version of the Samsung camera.
I'm with the Exynos version of the S10+ (SM-G975F) and flashed the latest ASCA OXM firmware and prior to doing so, when I was still on ASBA, i've noticed that my Samsung camera version was 9.0.03.13, now after I've upgraded to ASCA, the version bumped to 9.0.03.25.
Now, as many of you are probably aware of, the picture quality in terms of post-processing of the samsung camera app is not the best.
I own samsung devices ever since the good old S2, continuing to upgrade every year to the newest model so yes - I had them all.
I'm pretty convinced that the S10+ picture quality is inferior to its predecessor I had (Galaxy S9+ Exynos) and even did some comparisons using professional tools such as PS and PS Lightroom and as I see it, the problem is not with the hardware but with the HEAVY software post-processing applied on the captured images.
I check the GCAM port page on daily basis but the versions offered there are crappy at best.
In addition, i'm checking for the latest Samsung Camera versions as well and yesterday I noticed that there's a new version available - 9.0.03.29 which I can't install. (my guess is this is a 'system' app type, so without rooting my phone, I can't install it)
Now, like I wrote above, they (=samsung) usually tend to bump many system apps versions with their updates, but AFAIK, ASCA is indeed the latest available firmware for the SM-G975F.
Can someone explain please how come they've release a new camera version without releasing a new FW?
Thanks!
Eviatar
I tried also and refused to install with no reason
After it said your app will be updated it says app is not installed
eviatar said:
Can someone explain please how come they've release a new camera version without releasing a new FW?
Thanks!
Eviatar
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably the new camera version was released for another samsung model.
For example. I see that the Note 8 series got the update to Pie this week. So maybe the new camera version is for the Note 8 models.
A new version of a samsung app does not always mean that it is a better version than the previous one. It may just mean that it is a version of this app addressed specifically for the hardware and software of a specific samsung model.