Sharing a few low-light sample shots from the OPPO Find X5!
Quite impressed with the shots from the Primary lens! Captures great shots with plenty of light and very low noise levels. With the inclusion of OIS, the camera can take better low-light shots and less shaky images.
Now the inclusion of OIS also helps a lot while shooting long exposures with Pro Mode. OIS eliminates minor shakes and helps you shoot 1-2 second long exposure images without even needing a tripod.
Here's a picture I shot handheld with Pro mode.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
shot handheld on Pro mode with 1 sec shutter speed
What surprised me the most is the ultrawide angle. The ultrawide angle on the X5 is probably the best one out of all the phones available. The pictures are very bright and detailed. Colours are quite natural and the highlights and shadows are on point.
picture shot with ultrawide angle cameraI also did notice that the low light shots take less time to capture. Generally on other phones you do have to hold still for about 2-3 sec for it to capture.
I'm very impressed with the low-light capabilities of the Find X5. A combination of great lens hardware including the Marisilicon X chip and superior software processing helps the Find X5 shine under low light conditions.
Related
does anyone else find that the nexus takes much better still pictures than the galaxy.
Better contrast, saturation, less noise, better focus, especially in low light conditions.
Here are 2 examples, both at the same settings, except the galaxy i activated anti-shake, which seems to reduce the graininess a little.
Sure the galaxy pic looks fine when shrunk down by 50% but compared at full size, imo it looks like crap compared to the nexus
Galaxy
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nexus
Picture quality is indeed very poor on the SGS, maybe even worse than the HTC Hero I had before...pics look very blurry, almost useless really...hope future roms can improve this...(little hope).
After using the camera i feel that the auto focus system used aint that great and is the real failing point of the camera. Overall, pictures are soft and not well focused, and i just can never seem to focus on close subjects. E.g. when i try to take a picture of an insect, it focuses till its clear but then backs out and gives me the red box.
I think my Captivate cam is great.
www.dangdeals.com/dog1.jpg
www.dangdeals.com/dog2.jpg
www.dangdeals.com/dog3.jpg
To large for the forum.
those captivate pics are better than my galaxy.
i tried a second galaxy and the image quality was quite improved over the first one ....wether it is the firmware or the hardware i have no idea, but i have a feeling they are using different sensors at random.
with an HD video camera, you would think it would also take decent still images
....they either come out very grainy or out of focus
also my SGS camera is very poor, i hope that it can be improved by future software. Previously i had an Nokia E90 3M camera and it was way better.
I been taking a few pictures with HDR mode and without and i still cant see any difference. Today it was a clear sunny day and i took a picture of the sky, and both looked the same with and without HDR. The 3rd pic looked more noticeable but i was using an app.
1st pic without HDR
2nd pic with HDR
3rd pic was HDR with the app PRO HDR Camera
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
You're taking to much picture of the sky where there is to much light to notice any difference. HDR works better when you are taking pictures where there is more shade or in darker areas.
krico said:
You're taking to much picture of the sky where there is to much light to notice any difference. HDR works better when you are taking pictures where there is more shade or in darker areas.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok ill test out HDR again with that.
Jason2k13 said:
I been taking a few pictures with HDR mode and without and i still cant see any difference. Today it was a clear sunny day and i took a picture of the sky, and both looked the same with and without HDR. The 3rd pic looked more noticeable but i was using an app.
1st pic without HDR
2nd pic with HDR
3rd pic was HDR with the app PRO HDR Camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well HDR is not about this really, and on pictures like these you almost can't see any difference.
S4 imo has best HDR mode from all the smartphones i had before and i had a lot of smartphones.
Check out my pictures:
I'm still deciding whether or not I'm keeping the S7 Edge or going back to my 6s Plus, and the camera is a big factor in that decision.
In doing some testing, I've noticed that Auto mode seems to process JPGs differently than Pro mode. Photos I take in Auto mode look heavily over-processed, with awful noise reduction smoothing artifacts and occasionally even aliasing so bad that it looks like a heavily compressed JPG. Here's an example of the latter effect:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
That's a screen grab, zoomed in to 1:1, just to highlight the blocky edges around the circle and colour noise in the white of the sign. Both effects are visible even at 100% zoom.
To test this theory, I took a shot in Auto and Pro and compared the two directly. The focus was on the same spot and the shots were taken one after, just switching modes in between. No change in ambient light levels or other shooting conditions. The camera chose a shutter speed of 1/15 at ISO 200 for both shots so the settings didn't vary either.
Nevertheless, here's the result (screenshot from my image comparison software):
Unless I'm nuts, the shot on the left is clearly softer than the one on the right, not because the focus is off but because of the watercolour-style smearing of details.
Obviously the solution is to use Pro mode, but why would the images be processed differently? And if there's a good reason, why can't we choose to use Pro mode by default instead of Auto?
Very interesting! I ONLY ever use pro mode anyways so it would be nice to be able to set it as the default mode.
Hello guys, I am Rakesh and I’m a big fan of LeEco Smartphones. This is my personal review about the camera of my Le 1s. Initially, I was bit disappointed because of the camera output of my Le 1s, though it was equipped with a 13 MP shooter there were issues with low light performance of the camera and pictures having redness.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
LeEco surprised me with the new OTA update. It has resolved all issues related to camera and it has changed totally after the update. I never thought camera clarity could be altered to this extent through software updates. A big thumbs-up for the tech team for taking note of the feedback from the SuperFans.
The new interface is very simple and gives control over the features like delayed photos, Shutter sound and Exposure etc. The 13 megapixel camera of the Le 1S now supports HDR mode.
One thing I loved about the camera is its ability to shoot 4K videos and it can capture slow motion videos. Yes, it does shoot panorama as well.
Even the front 5 MP camera does a good job in low light conditions. It is good enough for selfies and the new beauty mode is simply awesome.
Hope LeEco will bring in more surprises for their users. Eagerly waiting for new OTA updates, a diehard #Superfan….!!
Hi Z5 Users! Just curious how we can get a good shot with moving objects?.... or anyone can show how to do it in a proper way?.... As I'm wondering how Sony did the following shots in their website? As I myself is always ending up with either focus center and blurry shots outside the focal point of the picture, or mostly with blur edges or noisy pic, do we have to always use a tripod to get a good moving shot? (especially for me with shaky hands lol).
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I don't believe they shoot those pics with a phone, didn't believe it as soon as the pics came online.
Sent from my E6653 using XDA-Developers mobile app
Ukiya8 said:
Hi Z5 Users! Just curious how we can get a good shot with moving objects?.... or anyone can show how to do it in a proper way?.... As I'm wondering how Sony did the following shots in their website? As I myself is always ending up with either focus center and blurry shots outside the focal point of the picture, or mostly with blur edges or noisy pic, do we have to always use a tripod to get a good moving shot? (especially for me with shaky hands lol).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use sports mode. In Scenes
Or Manual with low ISO and lowered Exposition im good light.
In a more difficult light with a slightly higher ISO which pushes faster shutter speeds. And lowered Exposition.