Upgraded after 7 years - Battlestations

New Build just finished this weekend
MB: ASUS ROG Strix B550-F
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Cooler: ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 240
RAM: Crucial Ballistix RGB 3600 MHz DDR4 8GB (4 sticks) = 32GB
HD: M.2 Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB SSD 2x in RAID 1
Power Supply: COOLMAX ZU Series ZU-1000B 1000 W (reused from last build)
Case: NZXT - H510i Compact ATX Mid-Tower Case
GPU: GeForce GT 640 (reused from last build waiting for prices to drop)
WAY faster than my old build loving it so far. Just need a better GPU and then time to upgrade the monitors. Looking at dual curved 25 inch.

RRiVEN said:
New Build just finished this weekend
MB: ASUS ROG Strix B550-F
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Cooler: ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 240
RAM: Crucial Ballistix RGB 3600 MHz DDR4 8GB (4 sticks) = 32GB
HD: M.2 Samsung 970 EVO Plus 1TB SSD 2x in RAID 1
Power Supply: COOLMAX ZU Series ZU-1000B 1000 W (reused from last build)
Case: NZXT - H510i Compact ATX Mid-Tower Case
GPU: GeForce GT 640 (reused from last build waiting for prices to drop)
WAY faster than my old build loving it so far. Just need a better GPU and then time to upgrade the monitors. Looking at dual curved 25 inch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What temperature are in benchmarks do you have for the cpu?
I'm asking cause the CPU has a high tdp and the hot spot isn't in the middle of the die

strongst said:
What temperature are in benchmarks do you have for the cpu?
I'm asking cause the CPU has a high tdp and the hot spot isn't in the middle of the die
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't run any benchmarks yet, which one should I run? Also the cooler has you set it up with an offset, it specifically mentions the CPUs hotspot is offset so you offset the cooler to cover it better

RRiVEN said:
I haven't run any benchmarks yet, which one should I run? Also the cooler has you set it up with an offset, it specifically mentions the CPUs hotspot is offset so you offset the cooler to cover it better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using an offset as mentioned which gives the center of the heat better to the center of the AIO plate, but not all AIO plates are the same, that's why I'm asking and cause the TDP and power consumption is 105 instead if 65 compared to the Ryzen 7 3700X so you have to deal with higher temps when load neads to be handled.

My GPU is trash so I need a good CPU stress test and I will let you know. Any recommendations?
Also it has been YEARS since I have applied thermal paste, you still put a little on and spread it around making a thin coat over the CPU, or is there a better way?

strongst said:
I'm using an offset as mentioned which gives the center of the heat better to the center of the AIO plate, but not all AIO plates are the same, that's why I'm asking and cause the TDP and power consumption is 105 instead if 65 compared to the Ryzen 7 3700X so you have to deal with higher temps when load neads to be handled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It appears I need to tweak my system as the CPU is WAY below where it should be.
The Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe has a bad score because I am using Windows RAID 1 and not hardware RAID 1, but the numbers it posted are good for what I use this for, programming.
Not sure why the CPU is trash, the Armoury Crate app (came with MB) the CPU temps never got above 60
UserBenchmarks:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 98.7%
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GT 640 - 6.1%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 255.6%
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 250GB - 95.9%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018) - 103.3%
HDD: WD Green 500GB (2009) - 45.1%
HDD: WD Green 3TB (2011) - 57.6%
USB: WD My Passport 0837 2TB - 38%
RAM: Crucial BL8G36C16U4RL.M8FE1 4x8GB - 93.8%
MBD: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CPU package never went higher than 62, and 'CPU' peaked at 51

RRiVEN said:
It appears I need to tweak my system as the CPU is WAY below where it should be.
The Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe has a bad score because I am using Windows RAID 1 and not hardware RAID 1, but the numbers it posted are good for what I use this for, programming.
Not sure why the CPU is trash, the Armoury Crate app (came with MB) the CPU temps never got above 60
UserBenchmarks:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 98.7%
GPU: Nvidia GeForce GT 640 - 6.1%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 255.6%
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 250GB - 95.9%
HDD: Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018) - 103.3%
HDD: WD Green 500GB (2009) - 45.1%
HDD: WD Green 3TB (2011) - 57.6%
USB: WD My Passport 0837 2TB - 38%
RAM: Crucial BL8G36C16U4RL.M8FE1 4x8GB - 93.8%
MBD: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING
View attachment 5472711
View attachment 5472719
CPU package never went higher than 62, and 'CPU' peaked at 51
View attachment 5472723
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did the benchmark test, but it's not reliable since there's lot of missing or incomplete tests: https://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/48368072
UserBenchmarks:
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 88.4%
SSD: Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB - 240.6%
SSD: Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB - 195.8%
SSD: Samsung 840 120GB - 60%
SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 500GB - 112%
HDD: WD Red 1TB (2012) - 78.1%
HDD: WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 500GB - 107.3%
RAM: G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB - 93%
MBD: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)
Have you tried with TimeSpy like i did?

Related

Do I have a freak HD2?

My HD2 will run stable clocked at 1.536Ghz; The maximum frequency allowable by SetCPU.
I don't remember HD2's normally running this fast. Not saying it hasn't been done just saying I remember people having problems past about 1.2Ghz. My last HD2 could barely break 1.1Ghz.
You have read on here about someone else who overclocked about that speed and their phone is now a nice paper-weight?
fred_up said:
You have read on here about someone else who overclocked about that speed and their phone is now a nice paper-weight?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I sure didn't @[email protected]! Do you have a link?
FireDemonSiC said:
My HD2 will run stable clocked at 1.536Ghz; The maximum frequency allowable by SetCPU.
I don't remember HD2's normally running this fast. Not saying it hasn't been done just saying I remember people having problems past about 1.2Ghz. My last HD2 could barely break 1.1Ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you will have a freaky-smelling-of-fried-mobo, very soon after running it at that speed.
matt
OCing 1st gen of snapdragon which use higher wattage and scaling to 1.5mhz is bad bad idea. Make stable profile for your mCPU with SetCPU with max: 1.2mhz/avg: 768mhz/idle: 640mhz you wont have any problems. Had no issue with HD2 OCed 24/7 for months with LeoCpuSpeed back when it was out. Just use common sense and don't OC if you don't need it.
Wow/ Thanks for all the words of warning guys.
Is this an issue with increased heat due to the higher wattage draw? Because one thing I have noticed strange about this HD2 is it seems to run alot cooler than my last one. My last one would get as hot as 104F. This one I can barely get to top 90F and a cool to the touch back of the phone confirms that.
Well more current = more heat, as its basically supplying more to scale the frequency. But my question is what is it that you do on your end that needs 1.5ghz OC? Top of that on HD2 thats insane, don't say you are gaming.
LOL not at all.
When you've been dabbling in overclocking since you were 14 and have gone as far as phase change cooling, you have an appetite to push things to their extreme limits.
I use to be like that lol held records in extreme overclocking forum but for my usage I hit my limit with quad core and stopped as any upgrade from then on for me is overkill as thats another matter not subjected to this forum.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Code:
O/S: openSUSE 11.2 (Linux 2.6.31.12-x86_64)
Case: APEVIA X-Plorer Metal Case (w/Side Window-Black LCD Temperature Display)
PSU: A-POWER AK 750 WATT ATX (20+4-pin w/SATA & PCIe)
Mobo: Asus M4A78 Pro (AMD AM2/AM2+ 780G/SB700)
CPU: AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition (Deneb 3.0GHZ 45NM 125W)
MEM: 4x2GB OCZ Gold DDR2 SDRAM 800 (PC2 6400 1.8V 5-5-5-18CL)
GPU: GIGABYTE Radeon HD4350 512MB 64bit GDDR2/800MHZ (650MHZ 80SPU)
HDD: Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 250GB PATA133/UDMA6 (8MB 7200RPM 9.4MS)
DMR0: 2x Western Digital Caviar SE16 250GB SATA2/3.0Gbps (16MB 7200RPM 8.9MS)
DMR1: 2x Western Digital Caviar Blue 500GB SATA2/3.0Gbps (16MB 7200RPM 8.9MS)
NSS: 2x Western Digital Caviar Black 1TB SATA2/3.0Gbps (32MB 7200RPM 8.9MS)
ETH: Intel PILA8460C3 PRO/100 S Desktop (PCI-RJ45 10/100Mbps)
As you can see this server has been completely dismantled maybe when I have sometime ill bring this FServ online as I usually use to host 50k users. I was one of the 5 "HyperNode". Use to pull 3.5-4TB bandwidth my ISP was pissed as I had to build custom router/RAN server which ran on special ITX system p4 3ghz, 2gb ddr2 pc2700, 120mb pata just to cope with the high level traffic. Was around 3.2-3.3K tcp callback per sec and 3.5-4k udp callback per sec. So you could see how my ISP felt lol been offline ATM for close to year now.

Sony Reveals Windows 8-based UltraBook and TableTop PC

Sony Reveals Windows 8-based VAIO Duo 11 Hybrid Ultrabook and VAIO Tap20 Tabletop PC
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sony has revealed two bold new designs in the VAIO series in the form of VAIO Duo 11 and VAIO Tap20.
The Sony VAIO Duo 11 slider hybrid Ultrabook combines fully-featured PC productivity with tablet convenience. The Surf Slider design transforms full-function Ultrabook PC into tablet operating mode for on-the-go computing.
The Sony VAIO Duo 11 comes with a 11.6-inch full-HD touchscreen and a digitizer stylus pen. It is 17.85mm thin, and weighs 1.3kg.
While the VAIO Duo 11 targets the professional on-the-go, Sony is positioning the VAIO Tap20 tabletop PC as "fun for the whole family". The VAIO Duo 11 is a new-style PC with multi-touch panel that comes with a unique adjustable stand for comfortable computing in any position: lay-flat, tilting or desktop-style.
It comes with a massive 20-inch screen with 10-point multi-touch operation lets all the family join in simultaneously with multi-player games. The built-in battery gives portability around the home.
Unique multi-user apps including Family Paint and Fingertapps Organizer.
Both VAIO Duo 11 and VAIO Tap20 run Windows 8 and are lined up for an October release. Pricing information isn't available yet.
VAIO Duo 11 specifications
Intel® Core™ i7-3517U, Intel® Core™ i5-3317U or Intel® Core™ i3-3217U Processor
Windows 8 or Windows 8 Pro
4GB or 8GB DDR3L 1600MHz SDRAM
128GB or 256GB SSD
29.4cm (11.6") OptiContrast™ Panel;
Full HD (1920x1080) with wide (16:9) aspect ratio; capacitive touchscreen
Intel® HD Graphics 4000
WLAN 802.11a/b/g/n; Bluetooth® Ver. 4.0 + HS; Ethernet (1000BASE-T/100BASE-TX/10BASE-T x 1); USB 3.0 (x1), USB 3.0 with USB charge (x1); VGA out; HDMI out; Memory Stick Duo / SD memory card combined slot; stereo speakers with xLOUD™ ; Full HD Web Cameras (x2, front and rear facing) powered by 'Exmor for PC' (2.07 megapixels); Sensors (NFC, GPS, Accelerometer, Gyro, Digital Compass); Windows button; rotation lock button; digitizer stylus; optional extended battery pack
Approx. 320 mm x 17.85 mm x 199 mm
Approx. 1.3kg (with standard supplied battery)
VAIO Tap20 specifications
Intel® Core™ i7-3517U, Intel® Core™ i5-3317U or Intel® Core™ i3-3217U Processor
Windows 8 or Windows 8 Pro
4GB to 8GB DDR3L 1600MHz SDRAM
750GB or 1TB HDD 5400rpm
50.8cm (20") VAIO Display Plus (1600x900) with wide (16:9) aspect ratio;
10-point multi-touch screen
Mobile BRAVIA Engine 2
Intel® HD Graphics 4000
WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n; Bluetooth® Ver. 4.0 + HS; Ethernet (1000BASE-T/100BASE-TX/10BASE-T x 1); USB 3.0 (x1), USB 3.0 with USB charge (x1); Memory Stick Duo / SD memory card combined slot; 2.1ch speakers with S-Force Front Surround 3D; HD Web Camera powered by 'Exmor for PC' (1.31 megapixels); Web and Assist buttons
504 mm x 187 mm x 304 mm (Minimum tilt angle)
504 mm x 312mm x 45 mm (Maximum tilt angle)
Approx. 5.2 kg (including battery)
Source : http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/29/3276522/sony-vaio-duo-11
Problem with Sony is they overprice everything.
Sent from a SYNERGIZED GalaxySIII
But at the same price point, Xperia give u more than a galaxy conterpart
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
epagib said:
Problem with Sony is they overprice everything.
Sent from a SYNERGIZED GalaxySIII
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really somehow I see their price good, because they're good at what they do when it comes to PC.

HTC Nexus 9 benchmarks

HTC Nexus 9 has appeared in Geekbench benchmarks today where it scored 1807 (in one benchmark) and 1903 (in another) in single-core and 3220 in multi-core.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Via http://blog.gadgetzarena.com/news/htc-nexus-9-appears-in-geekbench-benchmarks-database/
That appears to be as powerful per core as the A8. It'll be interesting to see what the linpack is.
I recon about 57000k in antutu benchmark.
Wait until these kernel devs get over here, glitch, elementrix flar, its going way over 60k mark. [emoji12]
MRobbo80 said:
I recon about 57000k in antutu benchmark.
Wait until these kernel devs get over here, glitch, elementrix flar, its going way over 60k mark. [emoji12]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cant wait
I remember when my nexus 7 2nd edt @ stock was 22k when the above guys were finished this was about 7 months ago mind you it was hitting 30k
MRobbo80 said:
I remember when my nexus 7 2nd edt @ stock was 22k when the above guys were finished this was about 7 months ago mind you it was hitting 30k
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My nexus 7 2012 got to 22k
What as stock?
---------- Post added at 01:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:12 AM ----------
May have been 24k long time ago now
MRobbo80 said:
What as stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
about 15k
Thought so lol. I'm off to bed now. I'm dragging these days out staying up late! Only about 18 bloody days left, dam that's along time ?
I compiled the results and compared to the 32-bit K1 and Air. Huge difference in CPU and memory performance, it appears the big architecture change of Denver is reaping the benefits.
Nexus 9 Geekbench (64-bit dual core Denver K1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1014854
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1901 / 3166
Single/Multicore Int – 2571 / 4560
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1132 / 2226
Memory – 2109 / 2262
Comparison to the highest Nvidia Shield Tablet (32-bit quad core K1) record:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/907462
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1159 / 3488
Single/Multicore Int – 1242 / 4339
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1037 / 3703
Memory – 1239 / 1358
Comparison to the highest Xiaomi MiPad (32-bit quad core K1) record:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/840481
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1075 / 3388
Single/Multicore Int – 1222 / 4220
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1020 / 3745
Memory – 894 / 1010
Comparison to the highest iPad Air (v1 Apple A7X dual core) record:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/736662
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1492 / 2701
Single/Multicore Int – 1582 / 3082
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1438 / 2828
Memory – 1421 / 1687
Awesome comparison!
Hopefully the n9 lasts for a at least two years
Wow, impressive! will put some emulators on this tablet
2 things:
1- Geekbench used in those tests is 32-bit, while the one used on iPads is 64-bit so results CANNOT be compared. The K1 should score even higher if tested using 64-bit Geekbench.
2- Why does it say 2.5GHz?
Dr. Hurt said:
2 things:
1- Geekbench used in those tests is 32-bit, while the one used on iPads is 64-bit so results CANNOT be compared. The K1 should score even higher if tested using 64-bit Geekbench.
2- Why does it say 2.5GHz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because that's all we have to go by at this time. Even then, it's probably a pre-production or testing model. ALL Volantis results have been run in 32-bit.
http://9to5google.com/2014/10/16/nexus-9-benchmark-is-comparable-to-a-2012-mac-pro/
We'll have proper test results when actual reviews are out.
iPad Air 2 Geekbench results have arrived, here's the comparo. Note that they have finally put 2GB of RAM in it. Also note that the N9 is still running x32 Geekbench, so not a true indicator.
Nexus 9 Geekbench (64-bit dual core Denver K1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1014854
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1901 / 3166
Single/Multicore Int – 2571 / 4560
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1132 / 2226
Memory – 2109 / 2262
iPad Air 2 Geekbench (64-bit tri core A8X):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1061742
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1812 / 4477
Single/Multicore Int – 1801 / 5015
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1698 / 4829
Memory – 2065 / 2698
SenK9 said:
iPad Air 2 Geekbench results have arrived, here's the comparo. Note that they have finally put 2GB of RAM in it. Also note that the N9 is still running x32 Geekbench, so not a true indicator.
Nexus 9 Geekbench (64-bit dual core Denver K1):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1014854
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1901 / 3166
Single/Multicore Int – 2571 / 4560
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1132 / 2226
Memory – 2109 / 2262
iPad Air 2 Geekbench (64-bit dual core A8X):
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/1061742
Overall Single/Multicore score – 1812 / 4477
Single/Multicore Int – 1801 / 5015
Single/Multicore FLOP – 1698 / 4829
Memory – 2065 / 2698
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
apple has been doing 64bit for a few years
and optimization the os for 64bit
But we have done a better job than they
this is the first 64 bit tablet in android history!
and its so kicking apple's (you know what)
Android is the bite that apple has
and we all know what happens after a apple gets a bite
Rot to the core
USBhost said:
apple has been doing 64bit for a few years
and optimization the os for 64bit
But we have done a better job than they
this is the first 64 bit tablet in android history!
and its so kicking apple's (you know what)
Android is the bite that apple has
and we all know what happens after a apple gets a bite
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amen!
tyvar1 said:
Amen!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can anybody explain why this is http://appleinsider.com/articles/14...w-android-tablets-including-nvidias-tegra-k1? I mean if only Nvidia had not stripped two cores...?
Far_SighT said:
Can anybody explain why this is http://appleinsider.com/articles/14...w-android-tablets-including-nvidias-tegra-k1? I mean if only Nvidia had not stripped two cores...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep in mind its pre production K1 and OS, running 32 bit Geekbench vs 64 bit on iOS, so not really comparable. Wait till final tests are ready and there's been time for 5.0 on K1 to be polished, it's a nearly new SOC don't forget.
AppleInsider is also well known as a heavily biased site, more so than other Apple sites, they'll often be very selective and misleading to fit the agenda their viewers want.
Having said that, I'm quite impressed with the A8X hardware itself, it's insanely powerful.

pipo K2 - 11.6" inch Windows 8.1 tablet / laptop,Core M 2Ghz, 4GB RAM + 64GB SSD, 3G

pipo K2 - 11.6" inch Windows 8.1 tablet / laptop,Core M 2Ghz, 4GB RAM + 64GB SSD, 3G
Hello,
This are some Detailled Informations about the soon to come Pipo K2 Tablet!
Screen Size: 11.6“
Screen Resolution: 1,366 × 768
Screen Ratio: 16:10
Touch Panel: Capacitive 10 point touch
System CPU: Intel Core M 5Y10, 2GHz
CPU speed: Clock 0.8Ghz, bust up to 2.0Ghz
Storage: 64GB (SSD )
RAM: 4GB DDR3L
Operation System: Windows 8.1 Pro
office Free office365
Camera: Front 2MP, back 5MP auto focus
I/O ports : 1x Micro SD slot
USB port: 1x micro USB 3.0 , (2x Full size USB 2.0 on the keyboard case
HDMI output: 1x mini HDMI port
Earphone jack: 1x 3.5mm
DC-IN jack: 1x, ( 1x dc on the keyboard case )
Microphone: 1x
Speaker: 2x Stereo
Communication: Wifi 802.11b/g/n ,
Bluetooth: bluetooth 4.0
Wifi module : WIFI 802.11a b/g/n+BT 4.0(RTL8723BU/12x13 Dual antenna)
3G/4G Built-in module: HUAWEI MU736/HUAWEI ME936/HUAWEI ME906C
Power: AC adapter 12V 2.5A
Weight w/o keyboard: 778g grams
Weight with keyboard: 1500g grams
Battery : 7.4V/35Wh
Endurance : 5-7 Hours
GPU Type: Intel HD Graphics 5300
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
it's main features are Core M Cpu, wich is more powerfull and less power Hungry, but way more expensive than Baytrail Cpus ! 100 to 200 Usd more expensive to be honest, is 50% more power worth it? what do you think?
it also features a better Gbu and 4Gb of Ram !
To guarantee the tablet’s expansibility, the PIPO K2 offers a slew of ports and slots (a micro USB3.0 port, a micro HDMI port, a micro SD card slot and a 3.5mm audio jack).
pipo K2 comes with quite a heavy but complete Keyboard
When attached Pipo K2 looks like a Real Laptop
Although the screen resolution is only 1,366 × 768 the contrast and color controls are very good, this may have a good impact on the price and Battery life too
The Price will be of 400 USD in China and so 450 up to 500 USD for Overseas Countries is to be expected
which is still quite expensive comparing to The previous windows Generation,
The Main reason is that windows stopped subsidizing it's Cpus the same way it did last year ! meaning that the new Generation Cpus are 200$ more expensive for everyone.
What do you think ?
Will chinease Core M tablets make it ?
For me Pipo K2 seems to be an ACER Aspire Switch 11 Clone with way better Functionality and characteristics For Almost the same place,
Will these be enough to convince customers to pay that much for a Chinese Brand? Only time can tell .

My rig

A few pictures and spec of my current system, comments welcome...
Case - Fractal Design Meshify S2 Midi Tower Case - Blackout Dark Tempered Glass
Motherboard - MSI Meg ACE X570
CPU - AMD Ryzen 5600X
CPU Cooler - ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420
RAM - 16GB GSkill Trident NEO 3600Mhz
GFX Card - EVGA 2080 XC Ultra
Primary Drive - Sabrent 1TB Rocket Nvme PCIe 4.0 M.2 2280
Soundcard - Creative Sound Blaster Z
Speakers - Logitech Z506 Surround Sound
Keyboard - Roccat Vulcan AIMO 120
Mouse - ROCCAT Kone AIMO
Mousemat - ROCCAT Taito
Headset - Roccat Khan AIMO
Primary Monitor - Asus VP28UQG 4K 28"
Secondary Monitor - Generic Dell 24" 1080p
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Bryski said:
A few pictures and spec of my current system, comments welcome...
Case - Fractal Design Meshify S2 Midi Tower Case - Blackout Dark Tempered Glass
Motherboard - MSI Meg ACE X570
CPU - AMD Ryzen 5600X
CPU Cooler - ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420
RAM - 16GB GSkill Trident NEO 3600Mhz
GFX Card - EVGA 2080 XC Ultra
Primary Drive - Sabrent 1TB Rocket Nvme PCIe 4.0 M.2 2280
Soundcard - Creative Sound Blaster Z
Speakers - Logitech Z506 Surround Sound
Keyboard - Roccat Vulcan AIMO 120
Mouse - ROCCAT Kone AIMO
Mousemat - ROCCAT Taito
Headset - Roccat Khan AIMO
Primary Monitor - Asus VP28UQG 4K 28"
Secondary Monitor - Generic Dell 24" 1080p
View attachment 5348113View attachment 5348115View attachment 5348117View attachment 5348119View attachment 5348123
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow that's amazing
Austinredstoner said:
Wow that's amazing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers man
Bryski said:
A few pictures and spec of my current system, comments welcome...
Case - Fractal Design Meshify S2 Midi Tower Case - Blackout Dark Tempered Glass
Motherboard - MSI Meg ACE X570
CPU - AMD Ryzen 5600X
CPU Cooler - ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420
RAM - 16GB GSkill Trident NEO 3600Mhz
GFX Card - EVGA 2080 XC Ultra
Primary Drive - Sabrent 1TB Rocket Nvme PCIe 4.0 M.2 2280
Soundcard - Creative Sound Blaster Z
Speakers - Logitech Z506 Surround Sound
Keyboard - Roccat Vulcan AIMO 120
Mouse - ROCCAT Kone AIMO
Mousemat - ROCCAT Taito
Headset - Roccat Khan AIMO
Primary Monitor - Asus VP28UQG 4K 28"
Secondary Monitor - Generic Dell 24" 1080p
View attachment 5348113View attachment 5348115View attachment 5348117View attachment 5348119View attachment 5348123
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Curious, why did you go with a dedicated sound card and not just use what's on your mobo? I used to always use Sound Blaster cards in my rigs but lately have stuck with mobo audio.
svetius said:
Curious, why did you go with a dedicated sound card and not just use what's on your mobo? I used to always use Sound Blaster cards in my rigs but lately have stuck with mobo audio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never liked onboard audio and even these days its still not comparable to a dedicated sound card.

Categories

Resources