Database Users

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the HTC U12+ come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

Hey guys, none willing to share his impressions about the camera?

The details, contrast and sharpness are great in most situations (look at the train).
The color accuracy is very satisfying (look at the sunset).
But the camera struggles in situations with harsh light incidence. Look at the photo with the dog. Where the light through the trees hits the ground, it looks extremely unnatural and oversharped.
All the pictures are point-and-shoot without editing.

Tierlord said:
Look at the photo with the dog.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forgot to upload the photo with the dog

Interesting! I just got mine, I will try it and report back

The camera is the saving grace of this phone for me, you can point and click and generally get a pretty decent shot.
The only thing I've noticed it does seem to struggle with is hard sunshine where it can be hard to get the camera to recognise the darker points instead of dimming everything down. But I'm sure that's the same with most phones.
I've attached a quick bokeh snap I took yesterday.

Shot in Paris with moderate light.
Sent from my HTC U12+ using XDA Labs

Full resolution here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/zz2116xqsl0zq04/AADyUJaQTy_iUYAsxMso1Gjya?dl=0&m=
**
**
**
**
**

With main camera https://ibb.co/Nm37R7q

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Moto E6 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

Took some photos with the rear shooter under an indoor lighting that I've gotten very used to after using a different mobile camera unit. With the Moto E6, going from ISO 200 to 400 in manual mode makes too big of a jump from "a little too dark" to "way too bright", every time, regardless of making adjustments in the other settings. The ISO isn't a problem with the other, lesser camera. Also with the other camera, taking photos of text is no problem, as is autofocus. With the Moto E6, the auto focus is disappointing, and taking pictures of small amounts of text is almost impossible, no matter the angle and adjustment with lighting, ISO, focus, zoom, etc.; moving farther away from the subject gives the impression that the text portion looks sharper, but I doubt the actual quality of the result (which I did not check because I wanted to move on).
Wasn't expecting much, but very disappointed by the Moto E6's camera, particularly with auto focus and image stabilization.

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Moto G8 Plus come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

I can definitely answer this one. The moto camera app is very very bad. At least for the front camera, it destroys photos with noise and blur. It is in really bad shape and I got a significantly better results using Gcam. I felt the need to inform you guys about this. Mind the front camera, it's worse than g7 plus, it's worth saying it doesn't record in 4k. I'm very upset by this. And it seems it's hardware

Try the GCam! The pics are much much better than with the stock camera app

balu94 said:
Try the GCam! The pics are much much better than with the stock camera app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so what if he use a gcam, gcam does a milions white dots on bright yellow orange surfaces

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Realme 6 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

Photos are over sharpened. The loss of details are very noticeable. The front camera has this wierd effect where it makes the skin smooth even with the option turned off. A bit of over saturation too in some cases. Things improve a bit in the pro mode. HDR sometimes messes up the pictures. Didn't notice lag in camera interface. Installed the first OTA.

I will waiting live review to i am get overall about this phone camera

Hi
In my opinion photos are good but depending of chosen camera.
The standard pics are good, the telephoto ones are excellent, the wide angle acceptable, the 64Mpx are "you must see them by distance"...
Night pics with integrated app are acceptable, but even with tripod mode are dark in the very night; but with a more specialized camera (camera FV5 lite) i did 30 secs exposures and got acceptable pics of fireflies.
And there's also a wordking Gcam which can usa telephoto and wide angle cameras.
Personally i'm quite satisfied for the price range.
P.S. i had a OTA in middle may.

On a stock camera, the raw format is of poor quality. Strong vignette and strong pink tint all over the frame. The red channel is swamped. This is difficult to correct in raw converters. For example, on Moto G9 Plus (same basic module), raw is of better quality. The tech support sends it to the service center. Does this mean I have to take every device to a service center?
I propose to add to the "Expert" mode, as well as saving in raw and for telephoto lens.
Also in the "Expert" I propose to add a 64 megapixel mode with manual settings.
About noise modulation in the video, already all who care to write. But nothing changes. On the test RUI2.0 noise modulation is not fixed.
Realme 6 Pro for Russia.

Photo quality

Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!

Much better than I thought, and with the recent update giving the A71 5G the upscale camera options, you'd be hard pressed to find much fault. I'm loving the pictures I'm getting out of it on auto, and the manual controls are awesome. I've been able to pick out details in 64mpixels that have really surprised me when zooming in.

Seems good overall, but I'm a person who uses DSLR cameras.
Phones can never really capture what a DSLR can accomplish, especially if
you're using modern DSLR's.
If you can do everything a Canon EOS 50D and EOS 5D Mark IV can do with your phone,
then you've advanced a decade or more into what DSLRs are capable of.
Having said the above, here's my takeaway:
Image quality is overall excellent after pixel-peeping on my desktop's 4K monitors, which surprised me. Color accuracy, saturation and intensity seems to capture well. Contrast also appears accurately recorded.
Sharpness doesn't seem lacking, while noise also is impressively lacking under good lighting.
I've yet to try low-light conditions, so can't comment on that.
The ultrawide lens is actually very good. No doubt using software that's not visible, it produces an extremely good rectilinear image without a fisheye effect. I'd say it's wider than a 14mm lens on my full-frame Canon EOS 5D DSLR.
All in all, it's a higher-resolution output than my Canon S-series p&s camera, yet with similar picture detail and overall image quality.