Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Sony Xperia 10 II come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
It's ok. Photos are better that previus generation, but still far from competitions.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Honor V10 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The photo quality from this phone can be a little fuzzy when you zoom in. There are definitely better cameras out there.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Whorst than a 2013 xt1040. Need flash to focus, low level of colors, low details, I'm sick. Photos 5; 6 and 8 wants about 10 minutes to take. 02.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Nokia 3.1 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This isn't a great camera, there are much better ones in the market in the same price range..
1. Oversaturation: This seems fine..
2. Sharp detail: Even with a dual camera set up at the highest resolution.. the image isn't sharp enough.. but the live Bokeh mode does an okayish job though..
3. Appropriate exposure: Sometimes, images aren't bright enough.. you have to go to manual mode to fix it.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Picture quality is worst compare to their other budget phones
cheese, the photos are of awful quality. pretty much the worst camera i've ever used apart from a 2000's nokia
7a
I quite like my 6a, my only problems are with write to SD card permissions!, but I would like a better camera. do you think the 7a would be much of an improvement?
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy A30 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Not good actually my sister's phone is realme 3 and even though the camera is lesser than Samsung a30 but it is better than a30