Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LG V50 ThinQ come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The cameras are good, generally. Well rounded, and well color balanced between lenses. The colors seem more natural or true. Pictures aren't as brightly colored saturated as some other devices.
---------- Post added at 11:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 PM ----------
The focal distance of the wide angle lens, for a "macro" shot is about 7 or 8 centimeters, which at that distance provides very clear, roughly 2x magnified images. It works quite well, and I am very pleased with this performance.
Does the camera take quick pictures? I had the V30 before and a common problem which they had was that there was a lag between pressing the shutter button and the picture being taken. This would mean that I would frequently miss photos of my kids, creating a blurred picture. I have read this was mixture of the phone taking a while to set exposure and slower shutter speeds being favoured in order to keep iso and noise low.
themancc said:
Does the camera take quick pictures? I had the V30 before and a common problem which they had was that there was a lag between pressing the shutter button and the picture being taken. This would mean that I would frequently miss photos of my kids, creating a blurred picture. I have read this was mixture of the phone taking a while to set exposure and slower shutter speeds being favoured in order to keep iso and noise low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really quick. Also night mode is really fast.
Says it all great camera and this is with night shot.
snaske65 said:
Says it all great camera and this is with night shot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are those?
They are zooanthoids in my fish tank. They are a soft coral.
Usually you dont get there color to well because of the blue night light, thebpicture gets washed in blue.
This camera can filter a lot of that out. A lot og phones cant.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Close up photo and also a close up screenshot taken with my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8.
jimmylips75 said:
Close up photo and also a close up screenshot taken with my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good lord I hope that's with the telephoto lens
Quite impressed with low light performance. Took this at the weekend at the back on a dark cinema whilst waiting for the trailers to start. Auto mode, no flash, no editing.
wnp_79 said:
Quite impressed with low light performance. Took this at the weekend at the back on a dark cinema whilst waiting for the trailers to start. Auto mode, no flash, no editing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that looks amazing. I just got the Note 8 too but I haven't had a chance to do low-light yet.
By far, the best camera I've ever owned.
Just need to find a big-ass spider so I can post some examples.
jimmylips75 said:
Close up photo and also a close up screenshot taken with my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please tell me you set fire to that nope...
jimmylips75 said:
Close up photo and also a close up screenshot taken with my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a little TOO CLOSE for me!
jimmylips75 said:
Close up photo and also a close up screenshot taken with my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's an awesome background/screensaver.
I'm aware that during low light the images will appear grainy or noisy, but I can see the grain even in medium light condition. Image is set at 4.3 ratio highest bit rate for pics.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
How about wide color
So, what is the use of a wide color gamut capable display if the camera still shoots sRGB jpg?! I have not found any info on the color space profile of Note 8 jpegs and videos, can anyone chime in?
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It was very dark at that hour and taken with telephoto camera not wide angle one.
ksekhar said:
It was very dark at that hour and taken with telephoto camera not wide angle one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you edited this photo in some app or this is original unedited pic? looks not natural tho
meryguadelupe said:
have you edited this photo in some app or this is original unedited pic? looks not natural tho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google photos auto
Now, this is by far not the best *quality* photos, but it does show off the functionality quite well. I took this photo of a room in my apartment with absolutely no lights on other than some light leaking into the hallway behind me from a neighboring room, and a pure red heat lamp for a tank (pictured). I went full manual, mounted the camera with some objects on a table, and set it to a 10 second shutter, thinking that I wouldn't be able to pull off holding it by hand. Then I held it by hand. These are the two photos I got (one braced on a table, one by hand) with a 10 second shutter in a DARK room (the braced one is zoomed in).
Here's a shot of that same room from out in the hallway where there's a little light (so you can see about how dark it is).
What happened to the scalable function between 0-100% when using photo filters like Vignette and Stardust etfc? Gone?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
I love the camera, works great for me
same
Limeybastard said:
I'm aware that during low light the images will appear grainy or noisy, but I can see the grain even in medium light condition. Image is set at 4.3 ratio highest bit rate for pics.
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine to even in really good lighting, using highest resolution.
Few observations after a month of use:
Picture quality overall is great, however the stock app tends to overblow the highlights in high contrast scenes. This is the effect of the small sensor size and it's prominent on all cellphones, however both Pixel 2 and iPhone X I've tested don't have that issue. However, installing and using the Google camera port helps the issue dramatically, so it's the HDR algorithm employed in the stock app, not the actual sensor.
Stock camera app is, however, both faster and more reliable in terms of snapping every day photos. Furthermore stock app has marginally less noise than Google Camera, but it also captures marginally less details. Stock camera also has less saturation and sharper gradients than Google Camera, likely a product of the algorithm as well.
The telephoto camera is decidedly worse than the wide angle one, even in bright light. You're trading off the dynamic range for zoom, and it's not just the difference in the lenses.
Lightroom HDR raw files (40mb 3.2MP image that contains 10 bit of colour) are mind-blowing. As an owner of full-frame Canon 6D I was blown away by the colour retention in Lightroom Camera app. On a DSLR you'd absolutely have to use bracketing to get those colours (although you'd get a 20 MP image), it's very impressive that a cellphone can do that. If only it shot out a 12 MP raw file.
Overall Note 8 has a very versatile camera with awesome picture quality, but certain scenes require he use of Google Camera for HDR+ algorithm to get the best results.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the HTC U12+ come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Hey guys, none willing to share his impressions about the camera?
The details, contrast and sharpness are great in most situations (look at the train).
The color accuracy is very satisfying (look at the sunset).
But the camera struggles in situations with harsh light incidence. Look at the photo with the dog. Where the light through the trees hits the ground, it looks extremely unnatural and oversharped.
All the pictures are point-and-shoot without editing.
Tierlord said:
Look at the photo with the dog.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forgot to upload the photo with the dog
Interesting! I just got mine, I will try it and report back
The camera is the saving grace of this phone for me, you can point and click and generally get a pretty decent shot.
The only thing I've noticed it does seem to struggle with is hard sunshine where it can be hard to get the camera to recognise the darker points instead of dimming everything down. But I'm sure that's the same with most phones.
I've attached a quick bokeh snap I took yesterday.
Shot in Paris with moderate light.
Sent from my HTC U12+ using XDA Labs
Full resolution here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/zz2116xqsl0zq04/AADyUJaQTy_iUYAsxMso1Gjya?dl=0&m=
**
**
**
**
**
With main camera https://ibb.co/Nm37R7q
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy fold come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy fold come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The camera is not consistent, some pics look amazing mostly and other are very grainy and not sharp, look out of focus, regardless of the lighting conditions compare the pics to the ones taken on my S9+ and those are better than my Fold's. Can anyone share their experience with the camera?
jhoserovi29 said:
The camera is not consistent, some pics look amazing mostly and other are very grainy and not sharp, look out of focus, regardless of the lighting conditions compare the pics to the ones taken on my S9+ and those are better than my Fold's. Can anyone share their experience with the camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I noticed the same thing, some pictures are out of focus for no reason.
samhall said:
I noticed the same thing, some pictures are out of focus for no reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does this happen often to you regardless of the light conditions?
jhoserovi29 said:
Does this happen often to you regardless of the light conditions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't used the camera often enough to say "often", I just walked around the house mid-day taking pictures to test the camera, and several of them were out of focus. I did some testing yesterday with "A Better Camera" and got perfect results.
samhall said:
I haven't used the camera often enough to say "often", I just walked around the house mid-day taking pictures to test the camera, and several of them were out of focus. I did some testing yesterday with "A Better Camera" and got perfect results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you share some sample pictures from the FOLD, please?
jhoserovi29 said:
The camera is not consistent, some pics look amazing mostly and other are very grainy and not sharp, look out of focus, regardless of the lighting conditions compare the pics to the ones taken on my S9+ and those are better than my Fold's. Can anyone share their experience with the camera?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for some reason, samsung's software is lowering the shutter speed, instead of increasing the ISO, so in turn, will usually result in a blurry photo...
there have been others that say using the Pro mode with everything on Auto is a better solution.
unfortunately, pro mode is not available on the front facing and wide angle cameras.
pretty disappointing performance on the cameras really.
£2k phone with that bad picture quality is unbelievable.
I hope they will solve this with next update as camera is useless in my opinion.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LG V60 ThinQ come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I'm not a great photographer but the photos I've taken have been ok. The main complaint I have is how badly the lens skews the image on the edges. It's pretty bad.
I wish the world was in a better state and I wasn't sick so I could take more pic samples.
Wish this had spot metering. But LG as usual has had software that takes away from a good camera.
I love the results when using in the manual mode. The histogram is a big plus.
My main complaint is even upright my photos seem to end up being rotated.
LG Software still struggling "mosaic" post-production below average light condition, but night mode is quite good! Not app, just effects. Right now I'm testing some Gcam distros, from yesterday - UltraCVM prepared for Mi 9T (both of them works with 64mpx sensors).
Is there anyway to use 3d photos like on Facebook?
The main reason for the V60 is awesome manual photo/video controls. The phone does well for auto modes in good lighting, but they are still over aggressive with noise reduction that causes the water color effect (also apparent in the V20 I had prior, so this just how LG wants it). HDR works well, but doesn't always get the white balance right and wish I could use it while also having some manual control. I also wish they would've went with a straight up 16MP main sensor. Shooting at 64MP is no better than the binned 16MP option, and often worse.
I did "stress test" the camera the other day. I prefer long exposure photos and these were from a couple nights ago. I was limited on time and location, so pardon the motion blur in the light painting photos. But still... Let's see Gcam do this!
Couldn't you tell what sensor V60 camera is based on? Thnx
64 MP shots in bright outdoor settings are amazing on this phone. Definitely an underrated camera by most reviewers imo.
Random shots + Basic Snapseed correction.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Google Pixel 4a 5G come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
So, I reverted the photo app to ver.7.x.x and even in poor lighting conditions(cloudy, 1/2 an hour to sunset) the pics look better than w/ the latest version.(better details on rocks surface, tree trunks etc...)
mzsquared said:
So, I reverted the photo app to ver.7.x.x and even in poor lighting conditions(cloudy, 1/2 an hour to sunset) the pics look better than w/ the latest version.(better details on rocks surface, tree trunks etc...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what you did not like in v.8? I saw the HDR is always on (on my previous Pixel 3a XL it was a choice)..
I thought the pictures were lacking sharpness and contrast, well it's an arbitrary, subjective opinion, but i think the pics look better after switching the app to older version.
TodNex said:
what you did not like in v.8? I saw the HDR is always on (on my previous Pixel 3a XL it was a choice)..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@mzsquared - interesting .. if you have direct comparable pictures will be good to see
Here's a couple photos of the jupiter/saturn conjunction the other night. I turned on night mode, the camera turned on astrophotography mode automatically. I had the phone resting against the car spoiler during the one minute exposure to keep it as stable as possible.
mmarcz
Missed the conjunction due to cloudy nights, got Orion/Betelgeuse tonight:
ultrawide photo from my P4a5g, coming from P2XL , photoquality is very good and ultrawide is nice bonus.
astralx said:
ultrawide photo from my P4a5g, coming from P2XL , photoquality is very good and ultrawide is nice bonus.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
with and without nightmode, all handheld...
Hello folks!
is there the lens blur option in Google Camera stock?
i had it in my glorious Nexus5x with a mod version
Sorry i am a Pixel 4a 5g newbie
Thanks a lot