If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the LG V40's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Having both the V30 and V40, I find the V40 display lacking visual pop. On the same brightness (V40 auto is always higher than a V30 for some reason), images on V30 are brighter and more colorful. Not overly saturated and definitely not as bland as on the V40. Even playing around with the various display profiles, you can't get them to match. Sure the panel is bigger and no longer has that weird grain looking texture the V30 has but it's also dimmer. I'm no coloring expert but just based on visual comparison, LG seems to have messed up the profiling on the V40.
With the V30, you could put it next to a samsung panel and compare camera shots you just took. It'd prolly work in LG's favor depending on the sammy device even. With the V40, that compare is just not a good idea anymore.
Related
If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the Moto G7 Power's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Hi everyone,
I have seen several Moto G7 Power units on display in shops and the displays on all but one of them had slight magenta tint. The one that didn't was almost perfect (compared side by side to my curent mobile, which I know is pretty accurate). What is your experience with display panel variance on the Moto G7 Power? Is there any way to tell what LCD panel is installed on a particular unit? Could it be that the units on display, which are in demo mode have some "boosted" colour profile applied to look punchier compared to other deices?
If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the Moto G7 Plus's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The display is good, but very blueish.
I deeply hope the next update fixes this or will provide color calibration.
I think the screen color looks pretty balanced, I'm using the Natural saturation setting btw. Compared to the screen on my G5+ which is rooted & using KCAL adjusted more to the blue side, my G7+ screen looks much less blue and almost reddish. It looks fairly sharp on the desktop and in apps, and the color in videos appears pretty realistic to my eye.
The G5+ had very poor color depth in stock but interestingly not in most ROMs, which needed correction with KCAL that made a huge difference. But testing the stock G7+ screen with Display Tester app's Banding/Contrast/Saturation feature it looks very good as is and would only need KCAL for adjusting color balance if desired. G5+ needed KCAL but G7+ doesn't in the same way.
If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the Moto G Power's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I posted this in the G Stylus forum. Same screen.
Saturation is typical LCD. Even with saturation selected. My previous phone was LG V20 with same kind of screen. With a custom kernel and kcal, I could make it look almost as good as a Samsung. I picked a wallpaper and icons that don't highlight it's LCD weakness. Icon pack is Darko2.
Well, colors are worst ever than. I have another phone Samsung Galaxy A40 and it is way way better, not work choose saturated or natural or boosted. Guess screen quality is selfish. can't say because of LCD, Sony Xperia XZ2 also have LCD, but it is better
If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the LG V60 ThinQ's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Color accuracy is ok when looking straight on the screen, but there's a massive greenish/yellowish color shift when looking at an angle.
I feel that the screen fares favorably compared to my now-retired LG V30+.
But cutting edge, this is not. Only 1080p despite the large screen size. Standard 60 Hz refresh rate.
It's an OLED, so that's always nice. But they didn't really invest much on the display. It's serviceable.
I find that the viewing angles are fine and haven't noticed any dramatic color shifts depending on the viewing angle.
I had no real complaints about the V30+. I have no real complaints about this one. But I knew what I was getting when I bought the phone.
On the bright side, FANTASTIC battery life!
Definately not accurate!
The whites have a slight red tinge no matter what setting you use (expert included)
But the screen is pleasant to look at.
Lots of off access color shift too.
I am very surprised at the uniformity between the main screen and the dual screen, well done!
If you're colorblind, please disregard this thread. Rate this thread to express how you deem the color saturation and accuracy of the Moto G9 Power's display. A higher rating indicates that you think that color accuracy is very high and saturation is excellent.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The colours looks well balanced. No tint of any kind is noticeable.
94% sRGB.
The natural mode is pretty good for all uses. Boosted and Saturated mode are also available for a more vivid display.
It's good enough for me, although obviously, I wouldn't trust it for any professional colour accurate work. (Not that any professional would use this for their work, obviously they would rather work on a PC, but still.)
It is more than good enough for content consumption.