Database Users

OnePlus X Benchmarks

Here are the various benchmark results from the OnePlus X device.
AnTuTu Benchmark score:38132
AnTuTu HTML5 test: 18219
Geekbench 3 score: Single-Core: 918
Multi-core: 2433
3DMark Score: SlingShot using ES 3.0 : 701
I've attached the screenshots of all the test result for reference.

38132 Antutu makes no sense. My OnePlus One with the same CPU/GPU gets almost 50K

XblackdemonX said:
38132 Antutu makes no sense. My OnePlus One with the same CPU/GPU gets almost 50K
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reaches upto 40K+ for mine in an tu tu.
And OPO has 2.5Ghz CPU but OP X has 2.3Ghz that differs the score.

I had 50k with my oneplus one and 39k with my oneplus x.
But, the htc one m8 had 2.3ghz s801 with 2gb of ram and had 45k antutu...

PoloB49 said:
I had 50k with my oneplus one and 39k with my oneplus x.
But, the htc one m8 had 2.3ghz s801 with 2gb of ram and had 45k antutu...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I know op x uses the least powerful 801 and m8 used the more powerful sd801 2.3ghz cpu.

Legolas.X said:
As far as I know op x uses the least powerful 801 and m8 used the more powerful sd801 2.3ghz cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, the X has the AA variant which has a lower clocked CPU and GPU hence the differences between other SD801 chips.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7846/...-snapdragon-800-and-801-clearing-up-confusion

kinghu said:
Yup, the X has the AA variant which has a lower clocked CPU and GPU hence the differences between other SD801 chips.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7846/...-snapdragon-800-and-801-clearing-up-confusion
View attachment 3538054
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, enough for UI animations and Fruit Ninja. I think that's a reasonable expectation for a $250 device with an awesome build.

CafeKampuchia said:
So, enough for UI animations and Fruit Ninja. I think that's a reasonable expectation for a $250 device with an awesome build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U could say that. Putting sd801 doesn't mean that u can always expect the top notch performance. Not everyone does hardcore gaming on mobile leave that to pc. Looking at price point it's kinda perfect.
I knw some ppl would tell sd615 performs better but that's a newer chip.

Those scores really don´t do the OnePlus X justice. The device runs so smooth and fast it´s an incredible device for 250$! I had no lags at all since using it.

The oneplus x uses sd 8974AA
but the gpu is clocked at 578mhz just like AB and AC version

^ Interesting.
Specs and benchmarks aside, it's a really smooth and fluid experience. I can't tell the difference between the OPX and OPO regardless of the extra 5k or so in Antutu. They did a really good job with the hardware and software for a nice user experience.

Agreed with everyone!
I dont know why antutu benchmark is low on this device, it runs smooth and neverlags till now, even tough i have filled my device with all the daily apps i need ,
If u ask me, i guess oxygen os is again to be blamed here,
I m not sure about this, but on my previous device some custom rom offers a difference of almost 5-6 k. So i believe an update or custom rom might enhance the score,
But still antutu benchmark dosent matter to me if my device is running smoothly??

Yup ur right Oxygen OS is the enemy here... Can't wait for custom ROMs

do the benchmarks change after flashing the custom kernel? If so, can someone upload a pic of the new benchmarks and see how it compares?

NekoXiu said:
do the benchmarks change after flashing the custom kernel? If so, can someone upload a pic of the new benchmarks and see how it compares?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go on default settings of blu_spark v25 kernel

loveboy_lion said:
Here you go on default settings of blu_spark v25 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, seems like benchmark didn't go up by much but the performance definitely is better !

41k

My antutu benchmark was 40801 with the stock kernel and stock cpu&gpu governor.
Changing both the CPU and GPU governors (on stock kernel) let me reach 43375.
I think there's room for further optimization.
By the way, the SOC version is nether AA or AB, since the complete code is
MSM8974PRO-AA,
just as this is a sort of "pro" version. In the table, the AA GPU frequency is 400 MHz, whereas in the OPX it is 578 MHz. I looks like qualcomm produced a newer version of the SOC, unsurprisingly the cited article, more than 1.5 years old, may didn't notice this.

Wow, my LG G2 is slightly faster? Disappointing because I got an invite and was going to buy one. Hmmmmm.

len_smith said:
Wow, my LG G2 is slightly faster? Disappointing because I got an invite and was going to buy one. Hmmmmm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wouldn't hold to much stock in what the benchmarks have to say. On my one plus one some of the laggiest kernel's gave the best scores.
Though having said that has anyone looked in to the voltage tables and CPU binning? I suspect there is more useful information there than a whole bunch of benchmark scores.
I have always regarded CPU benchmarks to be more about management of heat and thermal throttling than user performance.
For example my old lg g2 would let the CPU bake at about 72° where as on my one plus one the CPU is pretty much brick walled at about 60°, thanks to my kernels very conservative thermal profile.
The result is disappointing benchmark scores of around 32-38 antutu's. But in day to day use the one plus one is much smoother than my old g2.
I could install the original cm12s and start scoring about 51 antutu's, but in day to day use that ROM is a lag monster in comparison to what I have now. Also I prefer not to thermally stress my phone to much with hot CPU's. That's what killed my g2.

antutu is wrong. here are the real benchmark results between Op1/2/x

antutu is biased because it is favouring 64bit processors. a 32bit processor with 3 gb ram will always work better than 64bit processor with 3gb ram. this is an old debate on the desktop world when intel introduced 64bit processors. 64bit processors require double the ram just to give the same performance as as similar 32bit processors with half the ram. here are the Quadrant benchmark scores which does not bias/cheat results in favour of 64bit just to drive market sales.
23751 oneplus x
24187 oneplus one
26459 oneplus two

New perspective, interesting.

Quadrant? The 2012 app?
Enviado desde mi ONE E1005 mediante Tapatalk

any names for 32 bit benchmark apps ?

ChavitoArg said:
Quadrant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes back when benchmarks were not biased in favour of 64bit.
Mr.3bood said:
any names for 32 bit benchmark apps ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant

psychem said:
antutu is biased because it is favouring 64bit processors. a 32bit processor with 3 gb ram will always work better than 64bit processor with 3gb ram. this is an old debate on the desktop world when intel introduced 64bit processors. 64bit processors require double the ram just to give the same performance as as similar 32bit processors with half the ram. here are the Quadrant benchmark scores which does not bias/cheat results in favour of 64bit just to drive market sales.
23751 oneplus x
24187 oneplus one
26459 oneplus two
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My CPU score is saying something different... CPU score More than One plus Two ... Ooops

rockuppl said:
My CPU score is saying something different... CPU score More than One plus Two ... Ooops
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
23751 is the total score

[REVIEW][PERFORMANCE] Nexus 5X vs OnePlus X speed test! Battle of the Xs!

Hey guys,
Check out this video comparing the speeds of both the devices and find out if that less 2gb RAM really matters that much. https://youtu.be/j3J2DNHIbR4

OnePlusX only has the SD801 and it's still mostly faster. The 5X would have really been future proofed for a while with another GB of RAM.
Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Johnsmithson said:
Hey guys,
Check out this video comparing the speeds of both the devices and find out if that less 2gb RAM really matters that much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the opx tweaked in any way?

gavisharora said:
Is the opx tweaked in any way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's running stock OxygenOS 3.1.3 without any tweaks.

Definitely seems like the 5X was doing better until a few apps were in memory, and the redraws began. One extra GB of RAM would have been huge for the 5X...
I would have considered buying the OPX, even with the older SoC, but the lack of band support for US carriers was a dealbreaker.

I had OPX and I've changed it to Nexus 5x because OPX "wasn't" compatible with concrete pavement The thing i miss most is that 1 GB of RAM. Nougat is doing his best to open apps from memory as soon as it's possible but form time to time there are small hiccups and I have about 300 mb of free ram available (it's quite low IMO). Nevertheless, OPX was very delicate and I loooove low-light capabilities of camera in N5X.

[REVIEW][PERFORMANCE] Nexus 5X vs OnePlus X speed test! Battle of the Xs!

Hey guys,
Check out this video comparing the speeds of the devices and if the extra gig RAM really matters. https://youtu.be/j3J2DNHIbR4

Johnsmithson said:
Hey guys,
Check out this video comparing the speeds of the devices and if the extra gig RAM really matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is the opx tweaked in any way?

its normal for the opx to open apps faster than the nexus, after all the 801 is still a good cpu clocked @ 2.3ghz vs the 808 which is a low powered quad core + more powerful dual core @ 1.8 ghz, thats why the opx is still a bit faster. But knowing what i know now, i would definitely go for the nexus 5x over the OPX
Unfortunately opening apps faster is not all that matters. Ram speed and other stuff is important too, as well as software updates

gavisharora said:
Is the opx tweaked in any way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's running stock OxygenOS 3.1.3 without any tweaks.

Synchronize the touches on both phone FFS. Total waste of 2:25

64 BIT OS Vs 32 BIT OS

all buddies here at xda i would like to know what is the difference between 64bit os and 32 bit os. and pros and cons of each os.
as i am seeing some development of 64 bit os for redmi 2/prime
please kindly reply those who knows.
note that i googled but didn't got satisfactory answer.

For 2GB (Prime) variant it's good. For 1GB, it's a hell.
Explain:
The 64-bit OS is based on ARMv8 Aarch64, with many improvements in instruction set, specially the SIMD instructions and about memory access. But it consumes more RAM. I flashed the MIUI8 arm64 in my Redmi 2 1GB. The whole system is blazing fast, stronger in benchmarks, snappy as ever. But after installing some apps, the device becomes slow because low RAM.
Maybe with a lightweight AOSP rom could take away the RAM usage issue and receive the full benefits of the newer arch. While it doesnt occurs, I'm very satisfied with my RR 5.8.2. Stable, snappy and fully customized.

Dan_Jacques said:
For 2GB (Prime) variant it's good. For 1GB, it's a hell.
Explain:
The 64-bit OS is based on ARMv8 Aarch64, with many improvements in instruction set, specially the SIMD instructions and about memory access. But it consumes more RAM. I flashed the MIUI8 arm64 in my Redmi 2 1GB. The whole system is blazing fast, stronger in benchmarks, snappy as ever. But after installing some apps, the device becomes slow because low RAM.
Maybe with a lightweight AOSP rom could take away the RAM usage issue and receive the full benefits of the newer arch. While it doesnt occurs, I'm very satisfied with my RR 5.8.2. Stable, snappy and fully customized.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is that rr 5.8.2 64bit and with working volte?

Dan_Jacques said:
For 2GB (Prime) variant it's good. For 1GB, it's a hell.e
Explain:
The 64-bit OS is based on ARMv8 Aarch64, with many improvements in instruction set, specially the SIMD instructions and about memory access. But it consumes more RAM. I flashed the MIUI8 arm64 in my Redmi 2 1GB. The whole system is blazing fast, stronger in benchmarks, snappy as ever. But after installing some apps, the device becomes slow because low RAM.
Maybe with a lightweight AOSP rom could take away the RAM usage issue and receive the full benefits of the newer arch. While it doesnt occurs, I'm very satisfied with my RR 5.8.2. Stable, snappy and fully customized.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are wrong, also there is no performance improvements from 32 to 64bits (maybe better ram management and new cpu instruction set avaliable), I also seem to have the Redmi 2 with 1gb of ram, from all the 3 64 bits rom I noticed no performance decrease, maybe a improvement on the nougat arm64, I'm getting over 31000 on antutu, 560 and 1600 on geekbench, but arm64 is really nice to redmi 2, since it will unlock the support for some apps and games, also a prolonged support to when the normal 32bit arm art no longer be supported (just a theory of course).

TecnoTailsPlays said:
You are wrong, also there is no performance improvements from 32 to 64bits (maybe better ram management and new cpu instruction set avaliable), I also seem to have the Redmi 2 with 1gb of ram, from all the 3 64 bits rom I noticed no performance decrease, maybe a improvement on the nougat arm64, I'm getting over 31000 on antutu, 560 and 1600 on geekbench, but arm64 is really nice to redmi 2, since it will unlock the support for some apps and games, also a prolonged support to when the normal 32bit arm art no longer be supported (just a theory of course).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I saw performance improvements between MIUI8 32 x MIUI8 64. Look: there is really many changes in floating point instructions (arm64 supports double-precision fp, for example) and memory access. The gap is around 10~20%. I saw it in another phone, Doogee X5 MAX Pro. After Aug/16 the stock ROM was converted to x32. And performance decreased slightly. Antutu score decreased arount 15%. So, arm64 have performance improvements over arm32.

Dan_Jacques said:
I saw performance improvements between MIUI8 32 x MIUI8 64. Look: there is really many changes in floating point instructions (arm64 supports double-precision fp, for example) and memory access. The gap is around 10~20%. I saw it in another phone, Doogee X5 MAX Pro. After Aug/16 the stock ROM was converted to x32. And performance decreased slightly. Antutu score decreased arount 15%. So, arm64 have performance improvements over arm32.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using another device? from what I know this is redmi 2, we have a different source from other devices, and don't trust benchmarks, they are always wrong, a 64bit OS for redmi 2 is a good deal, there aren't fps improvements, but overall ram management, smoothness, and a really high decrease in stutters is very visible.

TecnoTailsPlays said:
Are you using another device? from what I know this is redmi 2, we have a different source from other devices, and don't trust benchmarks, they are always wrong, a 64bit OS for redmi 2 is a good deal, there aren't fps improvements, but overall ram management, smoothness, and a really high decrease in stutters is very visible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What ROM are you speaking? I flashed in the past and the RAM management was terrible. The phone froze for 10 seconds to become "live" again. There is a AOSP/LOS based ROM build in ARM64 to make real-world tests, or have we only MIUI one?
About another device: was the only time I could see side-by-side the ARMv8 and ARMv7 performance in the same setup. And ARMv8 aarch64 was faster, snappier. Not only in benchmarks, but in real-world scenario

Dan_Jacques said:
What ROM are you speaking? I flashed in the past and the RAM management was terrible. The phone froze for 10 seconds to become "live" again. There is a AOSP/LOS based ROM build in ARM64 to make real-world tests, or have we only MIUI one?
About another device: was the only time I could see side-by-side the ARMv8 and ARMv7 performance in the same setup. And ARMv8 aarch64 was faster, snappier. Not only in benchmarks, but in real-world scenario
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compare am64 caf-aosp vs arm caf-aosp

TecnoTailsPlays said:
Compare am64 caf-aosp vs arm caf-aosp
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll do it.
Where is the ARM64 CAF-AOSP? There is only the ARM one in the thread

Dan_Jacques said:
I'll do it.
Where is the ARM64 CAF-AOSP? There is only the ARM one in the thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Search on the comments Pirej posted a link for a 64 rom