G900F most battery friendly rom? - Galaxy S 5 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I dont care much about saving space, and from my experience debloating doesn't do much to the battery life. I'd like a stable rom with possibility of black theme. All I care about is decent speed and screen on time. As for kernel I'm open for anything. SmallWiz V8 UX seemed like a good fit, but fingerprint doesnt work and theming is not possible.
Maybe stock rom with assertive display, phoenix kernel and modded theme is enough?

If you want black/dark themes, you are limiting the possibilities by going with stock-based ROM. Resurrection Remix N may be a good candidate because it has theming support, good battery life (although less than stock) and is quite stable for daily use.
If you only care about battery life (and can give up some theming), (generic unbranded) stock official ROM is your best bet.

Saber said:
If you want black/dark themes, you are limiting the possibilities by going with stock-based ROM. Resurrection Remix N may be a good candidate because it has theming support, good battery life (although less than stock) and is quite stable for daily use.
If you only care about battery life (and can give up some theming), (generic unbranded) stock official ROM is your best bet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Surprised to hear that stock is supposed to be best. I had xXx rom before, but when I got my phone back from repair with stock rom and new battery there's less juice than on xXx. Regarding black theme, it's just about battery life, not about fancy theme.

plzextendcookietime said:
Surprised to hear that stock is supposed to be best. I had xXx rom before, but when I got my phone back from repair with stock rom and new battery there's less juice than on xXx. Regarding black theme, it's just about battery life, not about fancy theme.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stock usually performs the best in SOT tests because it has better frequency scaling and is able to use samsung closed-source drivers that is unavailable to AOSP ROMs. Most problems with battery life arise from either carrier bloat, or the apps installed by the user. There may also be a chance where something else is the cause but only in rare-cases. Usually a factory reset can fix all of these problems, however it may not work for all.
With that last line in the original post, it is often thought that using stock kernel will yield the best battery and stability. It has been discussed throughly about the battery impact a custom kernel places, and whether or not undervolting makes a difference (where it usually will yield almost none).

Any rom that supports the Boeffla-Kernel

i'm using popwiz 5.1
give it a shot
https://mega.nz/#!NdkgAAaa!7DQcxWBUtQbNaUTGaOPYOKZ641pICmWdlFISYZAfGlM

Related

Best ROMs according to users

As the title suggests, all the Moto x play users are invited to tell which ROMs they used and term as best.
The criteria is all you can choose from like fluidity, features, stability, battery life, etc
So start flashing new ROMs and keep posting in the thread.
Enjoy Flashaholics...
In my opinion Resurrection Remix has the best combination of features and it is very stable, but it could have better battery life and fluidity (I read that the next release will be more fluid)
CrDroid has the most commonly used features, it lacks some bells and whistles but it provides good battery life.
Using RR with squid's kernel, the device performs superbly, but yes, as @alresave mentioned, the battery life could be a little better.
Haven't used it personally, but for performance and battery life, I'd recommend you go for Tesla since its mostly AOSP and much more stable and fluid.
For me Cm13 with squid kernel
Chaotick said:
For me Cm13 with squid kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How is battery life vs stock for you? Also, does CM13 support ambient display?
I thought I saw temasek say his CM13 was tweaked to include it.
I just found out that the stock ROM doesn't support hotplugging, which I thought only had to do with the ROM. I'm wondering if I would get bettery battery life using CM13(due to hotplugging, mainly,) but also wondering if there are any noticeable hiccups still.
JohnHorus said:
How is battery life vs stock for you? Also, does CM13 support ambient display?
I thought I saw temasek say his CM13 was tweaked to include it.
Cm13 does have ambient display - showing notifications, clock etc.
On stock with my setting - I don't used greenify and such apps i got about 6-7 SOT with a little below 40 h mark without charger. I am using CM13 with squid kernel for about 24h and needles to say the battery life will be a little worse due to changing kernel settings flashing CM13 nightly update etc . The kernel needs to be left alone for a few days to settle which gives best results. Latest 0407 nightly build with squid kernel 16b with interactive governor will give 5-6 SOT IMO.
To put the battery life in perspective - my friend has stock HTC Desire Eye and he has to charge it every day with medium usage and maybe 3 sot.
From the next nightly ota update i will be using cm13 without any extra kernel just to see how the basic kernel performs and that the basic battery life is
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
alresave said:
In my opinion Resurrection Remix has the best combination of features and it is very stable, but it could have better battery life and fluidity (I read that the next release will be more fluid)
CrDroid has the most commonly used features, it lacks some bells and whistles but it provides good battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on Blisspop and man its got everything I need. It's stable and slick. Battery life has to be checked. Blisspop and RR are very similar in features they offer. Tried both of them.
The logo of RR is very slick and nice. Even the boot animation is really nice.
Automated reply by JARVIS
I miss SlimPIE. Some ROMs even say they have it but have PAPIE or CMPIE.
Gotta say the best rom was stock 5.1 but I found Tesla Rom to be stupid snappy regardless of kernel. Battery for whatever reason has been crap for me but most users in the thread report an amazing battery life. I've only had it for a day so I guess I'll let things settle and see if the rom does the trick after all.
I tried AICP and Bliss, and Bliss with ultra kernel r5 works fine!
If you want battery go with any slim based Rom's. That will be for battery- I tried orion- one bug each time I reboot data Sim got switched to primary slot.
Now I am sticking with Stock due to it's smart Sim feature.
I am on validus right now and it seems better than RR in terms of performance.
Automated reply by JARVIS
Tried Every ROM, But Stock Based ROM Marshmallux v2.0. Because Camera Performance & Battery is Great in Stock. Without Stock Other ROMs Camera Performance is Not Good.
tshohel7 said:
Tried Every ROM, But Stock Based ROM Marshmallux v2.0. Because Camera Performance & Battery is Great in Stock. Without Stock Other ROMs Camera Performance is Not Good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I find the camera performance satisfactory even in custom roms
K.khiladi said:
I find the camera performance satisfactory even in custom roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In Which ROMS
Stock rom or a debloated stock rom like marshmallux or GtrCraft are my personal favorite's for smoothness and battery life.

RRO/Layers compatible Stable ROM for N9005?

Hi there.
I'm on the outlook for a STABLE rro/layers compatible ROM for my N9005.
I've been using Touchwiz derivative ROMs for some time (such as DarkLord's S6/N5), as they tend to be really stable, and I find that the battery life is excellent (2 days).
I've been steering away from AOSP (etc) ROMs for some time, due to what - from my experience - is a great deal of instability (random reboots, frequently), and very poor battery life for the same usage (a recharge ESSENTIAL at the end of every day).
However, no matter how I dress the Samsung up (Nova launcher, Samsung material theme, Flat bars xposed extension), I never really can get it looking how I desire: I'd really like to get it looking very clean and dark clean and light)
'
So, can people suggest rro/layers compatible ROMs that are foremost stable and with excellent battery life?
Cheers
M
P.S. I have updated my modem to the latest Samsung firmware
You can use aryamod, audax rom, phonesis battery life is depending on kernel configuration not only on the rom you use. Find some tutorial how to set kernel for battery optimization, and you can albo use greenify apk for hibernate aps.

Which custom ROM gives the best battery Life...!!!?!!!

First of all thanks to all developers who are providing us such an awesome custom roms for lenovo k50 series. I appreciate their hard work.
I have only one question for all developers as well as junior and senior members in this community who are regularly flashing custom roms on their devices>>
which custom rom gives the best battery life for lenovo k3 note/k50-t5 ?
Please comment below and let us all know, up till now which is the best custom rom for lenovo k3 note....!!
I guess you mean the best battery life, in which case I'd like the answer too - more specifically, which K3 Marshmallow ROM gives the best battery life?
Hi all, in my case, i try many roms.
1.- VIBEUI_V3.5_1628_7.142.1 this one make me fell my lemon like a watermelon lol, coz i see it so heavy, but a good timing of battery, like a 5 hours continue of full screen work.
2.- s424_VISNu_Lemmonade this is very fluid, no lag in screen but the time of charge was like a 2 and half hours to charge the battery, much time for me.
3.- the_flash_rom_ota_edition_v6.9.3_1621_by_jdesig frome other page, was so fluid, 4 hours of screen work countinue, 2 hours of charhing battery.
4.- an is the rom that i have now, Ghost_Glich_V6 this one fluid, 4.5 to 5 hours of work screen, and 1.5 hour of charge battery, its stable and i like it lol.
I hope to see your e periences too.
Enviado desde mi Lenovo K50-t5 mediante Tapatalk
Is over heating issue on custom ROMs is directly related with Battery Life ? Because I noticed that those custom ROMs which have over heating issue , drained battery faster.......!
I used almost every custom ROMs except MIUI ROMs(I honestly don't like the UI) , which are being posted on XDA as well as on needrom..!! Out of which I made a list of few Stable ROMs as given below:
1) BLEND ROM (Stable, Battery drain fast, Heating issue)
2)Official VIBEUI_V3.5_1629_7.155.1_DEV_K50-T5 (Stable, Battery life ok)
3)XUI MM 6.0 (Stable, Battery drain fast, Over heating issue)
4)AOSP PURE St 1.5 (Stable, Battery drain fast, Heating issue)
5)Ghost Glitch v6 (Stable, Good battery life, NO heating issue, Except so many useless Apps)
6)VIBE PURE St 1 (Stable, Heating issue, Battery life ok, VR support)
7)Androium VUI K3N (Stable, NO heating issue, Battery life ok, OTA support, VR support)
8)Paranoid Android V3 Final Version (Stable as compared with other CM based ROMs, Heating issue, Battery drain fast)
9)UNOFFICIAL CyanogenMod 12.1 Final (Stable, Battery life ok, Touch sensitivity Issue)
10)Resurrection Remix (Stable, Battery drain fast, Heating issue)
11)BLISSPOP UNOFFICIAL (Stable, Heating issue, Battery drain fast)
I also flash so many CM based ROMs like CM 13, AICP 10, AICP 11 etc. on my device, but there are so many bugs in it .
We don't know when we get the BEST Stable ROMs..!! But, I definitely request the BLEND ROM developer "Indian Tigers" please give us a new update on BLEND ROM. And one more thing guys - ANTUTU Benchmark scores are useless. There is no need to overclock the CPUs, in daily usage basis we expect stable, good battery life and new added features in our devices.
Custom version of s427 is pretty much good by fran123 on needrom.. I'm using his rom and its stable and battery life is ok..
For me best Battery life is Androium VUI 1 (OTA AIUM 1,2)
Just charging battery takes over 6 hours of.
here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/k3-note/development/rom-6-0-androium-vui-1-t3428492
and here:
http://www.needrom.com/download/androium-vui-k3n/
I have found the stable Cyanogenmod 12.1 ST5 ROM to be quite good.
Guys, I am using this ROM "http://www.needrom.com/download/paranoid-android-v3-final-version/" from needrom and applying this patch from "http://forum.xda-developers.com/k3-note/development/patch-lagfix-rom-t3466057" developed By sandeep.sethi. I am using this ROM around two & a half weeks. I must say this the best and stable ROM available on cyanogenmod base. Heating issue was solved by applying this patch as well as battery life increases. Thanks a lot for providing us such a valuable patch. This patch saves so many ROMs life and increase the performance level......!!!!!
I tested many roms regarding the battery life in the past and reported all the results in the Index Thread with screens and all. One of the very best for battery is SudaMod and I'm still using it.
Actually there is no rom right now give such that...the android itself make battery life short.
Google has develope new android 7 nougat & state that it has improve the battery consuming power for smartphone
I'm very happy with the italian rom MM 6.0 1621 (and 1609 with google dialer) from the italian developer Cuoco92. It has a very good battery life, plus other little features like the touch on status bar clock to shut off the display and so on.
The only thing that I don't like is the showing of numbers on dialer and dial list. I resolved installing Truecaller.
The rom is in the Cuoco92's channel at androidfilehost.
prosen_ghosh said:
Guys, I am using this ROM "http://www.needrom.com/download/paranoid-android-v3-final-version/" from needrom and applying this patch from "http://forum.xda-developers.com/k3-note/development/patch-lagfix-rom-t3466057" developed By sandeep.sethi. I am using this ROM around two & a half weeks. I must say this the best and stable ROM available on cyanogenmod base. Heating issue was solved by applying this patch as well as battery life increases. Thanks a lot for providing us such a valuable patch. This patch saves so many ROMs life and increase the performance level......!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its Aosp based not cm
Only cm theme engine is added

Which is more stable, and best battery life?

Lineage OS, AOSP, or Stock Android?
Nytrikx said:
Lineage OS, AOSP, or Stock Android?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no personal experience with Lineage but I was never a fan of Cyanogenmod and have read multiple posts that suggest it's pretty buggy. Stock will depend on which version of Android you are talking about. All versions of stock are pretty stable. Marshmallow is outdated but some people prefer it to Nougat because it gets better battery life than Nougat and works with Xposed. Nougat gets the latest features and security updates but for some reason Google has been pushing the default kernel settings very high recently so people have been experiencing poor battery life and the operating system itself eating up much more battery than in the past. AOSP would depend on the Rom you are running. I use Dirty Unicorns which is extremely stable and has better battery life than stock. Some Aosp Roms are more buggy and may provide better or worse battery life than stock depending on how they are programmed. There are also stock based Roms like Cortex, which adds Pixel features and gets the best battery life of any Rom I've been on. But the downside of a stock based Rom is that there is no OMS support for Substratum theming. My personal preference is for Dirty Unicorns but different people like different Roms.
I went to dirty unicorns and to me it's is faster than stock ROM cortex. I also like DU because it is oms and that is very important to me. Also having nav bar button customization is a plus. I would only jump back to stock if aosp takes to long to release
Stock is always most stable and allows for instant, effortless updates when available.
In terms of battery life, varies on your usage, I've had battery life that I would expect from a 3450 mAh phone.
You would see people buy a 6P and then start installing ROMs hours after and claim to get better/phenomenal battery life. Funny thing is that they have no idea what baseline is -_-
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
richii0207 said:
Stock is always most stable and allows for instant, effortless updates when available.
In terms of battery life, varies on your usage, I've had battery life that I would expect from a 3450 mAh phone.
You would see people buy a 6P and then start installing ROMs hours after and claim to get better/phenomenal battery life. Funny thing is that they have no idea what baseline is -_-
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I went from Cortex to stock 7.1.2 for several days because I wanted to try stock again. The drop off in battery life was extremely noticable. People have also noted that on recent builds of stock if you look at the battery stats Android operating system and screen are eating up much more battery than they used to.
---------- Post added at 06:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:30 PM ----------
AndrewM3 said:
I went to dirty unicorns and to me it's is faster than stock ROM cortex. I also like DU because it is oms and that is very important to me. Also having nav bar button customization is a plus. I would only jump back to stock if aosp takes to long to release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't notice DU being any faster but I do like OMS support. There always seem to be problems with Substratum if you don't have it.
Bro, Chads uber obviously is the best. It is on clang 5.0.0 and is extremely fast and stable and I get up to 8 hours sot and weeks on standby. Also I built wakeblock for uber so I can block wakelocks to save even more battery.
Nytrikx said:
Lineage OS, AOSP, or Stock Android?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello,
All ROMs should be stable. Stock is bloated, using a custom ROM helps getting ride of all the unnecessary stuff running in the background. Depending on your usage, battery life will fluctuate.
I only browse, send SMS/MMS, take pictures, videos and watch youtube with my phone. Mostly over WiFi. Don't have social network apps syncing in the background all the time. Yeah, i get 7 hours sot...
But, i guess the same with 3G/4G + Facebook + WhatsApp, etc... And I would be down to 3 hours sot obviously...
Don't let people decide for you which ROM is the best, because there is none. The best ROM is the one you like. These guys put a lot of time and effort to release their ROM. Some more than others, but still, saying this or this ROM is the best is kind of dumb and also insulting to other developers.
If there was a "best" ROM, the forum would only have one. Because everybody would use it. Or there is a best ROM and in this case those using the others are completely blind to see the truth?
Lol...
Check the forum and decide by yourself. Some are stock based, others aosp, lightweight or filled with a lot of options and customization.
Takes a few minutes to setup and if you don't like one, switch to another...
Happy flashing.
Cheers...
DEVILOPS 007 said:
Bro, Chads uber obviously is the best. It is on clang 5.0.0 and is extremely fast and stable and I get up to 8 hours sot and weeks on standby. Also I built wakeblock for uber so I can block wakelocks to save even more battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get 8 hrs SOT with any rom, including stock, given the proper usage.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
richii0207 said:
You can get 8 hrs SOT with any rom, including stock, given the proper usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really with sot. It depends highly on the rom and kernel.

Best Custom rom

Hello guys
I've just received my OP5 and I was wondering which rom + kernel combinaison to install for the best battery life / performance combo
Thank you in advance
Try them and see how you get on, other members here usage will likely be very different to your own and also consider signal quality, what apps you use will also be different.
I've tried a bunch, some Oxygen based (the stock OS) and other AOSP based. Both offer great battery life (7-10 hours SOT) and stability, so it really comes down to the features you are looking for
google it, you will find the rom

Categories

Resources