I have received the XZs. Here are some Camera Samples i have created. At the Point, i am satisfied with them.
Originals here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zc0zk9g7hveulko/xzs-pics-samples.zip?dl=1
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Some normal Video Samples:
Some slow motion video samples:
Video Originals here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9he8ksawhtxeble/MOV_0050.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kl3hxo3d8vgwvh8/MOV_0045.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/db2pzxtdmur7pc8/MOV_0049.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0bqddgak8amqk96/MOV_0119.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ykvaon5tg0p075m/MOV_SM_P960F_20170429181956.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8ttr6vm1k6mb1n0/MOV_SM_P960F_20170429210556.mp4?dl=1
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7mft8a7m7zdcodl/MOV_0035.mp4?dl=1
The 960 slow motion will not has decent image quality when there are no any bright or good light sources (I mean not directly focusing on the light sources). Lots of noises.
exeon said:
The 960 slow motion will not has decent image quality when there are no any bright or good light sources (I mean not directly focusing on the light sources). Lots of noises.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As to be expected due to the insanely fast shutter speed required to shot 960 fps.
Related
I'll try to shoot a short film with sgs2 in next few weeks. Managed to attach it to my dslr rig and sound will be recorded via zoom h4n & ntg2 shotgun mic. I did a quick test today with lgcamera because that is the only one that I found that had infinity/macro focus option, but no ISO settings. The stock camera is practically unusable because of the continuous focus. But lgcamera had a lot of problems and the videos know to end up with glitches and freezes sometimes. Is there a camera app or modified stock camera that has focus settings (auto/infinity/macro)? I'm on non-rooted sgs2, int version.
Here is the test video
and here is the rig
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Here is an example, of what does UHD (4K) means compared to FHD (1K).
The picture simply puts 4K to FHD side by side, and some resolution information, and the size of the extracted snapshots using VLC player.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And if you see the picture and say that the FHD looks brighter, its because of the angel that the phone was, the Z2 respectively.
The letter "s" is followed by "c" which makes the word screen, taken by the back of screen protector pack.
I was just cirious if the Z2 produces a real 4K shots, since 3rd party apps like google camera would not detect 4K, so i just tested it out by myself and figured it finally!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/sets/72157681819029571/with/33937948243/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Promising, indeed !
aknotts415 they look outstanding. I wonder if tripod was used because some images shutter is 30-40. In comparison to what has been posted already it looks so much better, steadier and practically free of motion blur.
nebulaoperator said:
aknotts415 they look outstanding. I wonder if tripod was used because some images shutter is 30-40. In comparison to what has been posted already it looks so much better, steadier and practically free of motion blur.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not full seconds thats partial,
indeed. I could see less light bleeding in this series. I love that shot IMAG0061
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/34615441411/in/album-72157681819029571/
Thread closed, there is a camera thread here: camera thread
Hey guys, i want to start discussion and i need solution
okay, actually i like a long exposure photoghraphy, but i a have problem with my op2 stock camera
i have bad quality image if i want capture long shutter speed with stock camera
i make comparison with bacon camera, i will give you samples images
Settings on both : ISO 100 Shutter Speed 8 sec
STOCK CAMERA
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
BACON CAMERA
bacon camera have a better photo than stock camera,is this a bug? is there any problem with software my camera?please give me solution if you know how to fixed it
sorry for my bad english , best regards ermariio
A few days ago I got out and about in town to test out the night shot capabilities of these cameras. Overall very impressed with the low noise, details, and the fact the black night sky actually looks deep black as it was. The Ultrawide has to be one of the best I've tested for low light, really something the details and lack of noise artifacts. My only minor criticism here is the shots could be a little brighter overall? And the front cameras can be a little overexposed or artificially bright at times. This even happens in daylight with the front selfie camera.
But impressive night photography.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}