Related
Hi, for those who own an Galaxy Note 3 (with a Snapdragon 800), does it have the Quick Charge feature that the LG G2 has?
And if it does, how fast does it charge? A guy at a retailer says the LG G2 can charge from 0% to full in 30minutes.
(I'm only comparing this to the LG G2 is because both of them have a snapdragon 800 which supports it)
EDIT; I mean to say Quick Charge 2.0, not 3.0
I think that's a miss quote on the LG tech... its zero to 80% in 30 mins.
Thats still good, but yeah unless im doing it wrong the note3 doesnt have that.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk now Free
senectus said:
I think that's a miss quote on the LG tech... its zero to 80% in 30 mins.
Thats still good, but yeah unless im doing it wrong the note3 doesnt have that.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk now Free
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for replying.
but thats weird, i dont get how the LG G2 which has a micro usb port charges faster than a note 3 with a USB 3.0
pham818 said:
thanks for replying.
but thats weird, i dont get how the LG G2 which has a micro usb port charges faster than a note 3 with a USB 3.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i could be wrong:
http://mobilesyrup.com/2013/09/05/t...ting-smartphone-released-this-year-heres-why/
it says that :
Perhaps even more exciting is, combined with Qualcomm’s Quick Charge 2.0, the Galaxy Note 3′s 3200mAh battery will charge much, much faster. USB 3.0 alone improves charging speeds from 500mA of current to 900mA, which is closer to an AC adapter than a USB port. The Note 3 also sports a 1.5A mode, too, which promises to bring charging time to under two hours.
The charger that it comes with is 2.0 A
senectus said:
i could be wrong:
http://mobilesyrup.com/2013/09/05/t...ting-smartphone-released-this-year-heres-why/
it says that :
Perhaps even more exciting is, combined with Qualcomm’s Quick Charge 2.0, the Galaxy Note 3′s 3200mAh battery will charge much, much faster. USB 3.0 alone improves charging speeds from 500mA of current to 900mA, which is closer to an AC adapter than a USB port. The Note 3 also sports a 1.5A mode, too, which promises to bring charging time to under two hours.
The charger that it comes with is 2.0 A
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahh thanks for the info
It appears like Samsung's Adaptive Fast Charge is in fact an equivalent of Quick Charge 1.0 but not Quick Charge 2.0.
Samsung's adapter outputs either 5V or 9V:
http://www.samsung.com/us/support/faq/FAQ00071944/98120/SM-N910PZKESPR
Quick Charge 2.0 outputs 5V, 9V and 12V. It is confirmed by this photo of Motorola's Turbo Charger as well as exemplary page of some OEM quick charge 2.0 adapter:
http://auonlineshop.kddi.com/disp/CSfLastGoodsPage_001.jsp?GOODS_NO=4528&dispNo=001001002
Just a guess but I expect your need a bigger battery, like that in a tablet, to handle charging at 12 volts. As it is, I'm blown away by how fast this phone charges on the adaptive charger. Just wish I could get one for the car.
rcobourn said:
As it is, I'm blown away by how fast this phone charges on the adaptive charger. Just wish I could get one for the car.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I couldn't agree more :highfive:
Yep, its a beast at charging, according to PhoneArena it remains the fastest charging phone around, so its Adaptive Fast Charging is doing an incredible job!
My concern would be what it does to battery life..can't help but think the lifespan of the battery will take a hit using fast charging all the time.
rcobourn said:
Just wish I could get one for the car.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could always buy a car power inverter and use the fast charging adapter with that.
railshot said:
You could always buy a car power inverter and use the fast charging adapter with that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My car has an a/c outlet; the real problem is just finding stock on the adaptive charger. Even then, don't much want a cord running to outlet in back seat. As for using an inverter.. D/C ports are in awkward places to use one in Explorer. Will make due until auto version is available.
Guys does anyone know if the below accessory is real?
Samsung Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0 USB Car Charger [Part No: ECA-P20CWE]
Not sure if this is real as this is the only website that stocks this 'Samsung branded' charger. A google search shows similar items on Alibaba so I'm guessing this is fake.
Anyway I am going to buy this:
rcobourn said:
Just a guess but I expect your need a bigger battery, like that in a tablet, to handle charging at 12 volts. As it is, I'm blown away by how fast this phone charges on the adaptive charger. Just wish I could get one for the car.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean you wish you could get one for your car? There are plenty of compatible models available for your car. This one has 1 quick/fast charge port and 3 regular 5v 2.4amp ports.
http://www.amazon.com/Intelligent-C...d=1428955440&sr=1-5&keywords=quick+charge+2.0
bnl552 said:
What do you mean you wish you could get one for your car? There are plenty of compatible models available for your car. This one has 1 quick/fast charge port and 3 regular 5v 2.4amp ports.
http://www.amazon.com/Intelligent-C...d=1428955440&sr=1-5&keywords=quick+charge+2.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are quoting a post from last October. Things have changed.
2.0 works the same?
I am planning a 900 mile hike and need to minimize weight since I will be bringing filming gear. I have purchased a light weight plug strip with Quick Charge 2.0 USB ports. Will this work the same as the Adaptive Fast charger for my Note Edge? Or will I still need to bring the little white USB/AC plug thingy?
Thanks!
Guess I'll find out when the plug strip arrives.
light weight plug strip (http://www.amazon.com/BESTEK-2-Outl...&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o00_s00)
Power Device: (http://www.amazon.com/Generator-Eme...&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o06_s00)
lustyffh said:
It appears like Samsung's Adaptive Fast Charge is in fact an equivalent of Quick Charge 1.0 but not Quick Charge 2.0.
Samsung's adapter outputs either 5V or 9V:
http://www.samsung.com/us/support/faq/FAQ00071944/98120/SM-N910PZKESPR
Quick Charge 2.0 outputs 5V, 9V and 12V. It is confirmed by this photo of Motorola's Turbo Charger as well as exemplary page of some OEM quick charge 2.0 adapter:
http://auonlineshop.kddi.com/disp/CSfLastGoodsPage_001.jsp?GOODS_NO=4528&dispNo=001001002
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They have the right chips. I read the actual quick charge 2.0 will charge faster than the fast charge the phones come with. But then I thought, since the chips are there, would some simple mods make this work?
delete this someone ......answered my own question
Hmmm... interesting question...
When thinking back to how certain kernels could enable faster charging when connected via USB to pc, maybe this is possible...
Sent from my Nexus 5
Quick Charge by Qualcomm ups the voltage to as high as 12V, I believe. The fast charging in the new Nexus line is at a constant 5V. If the phone's internals (which goes way beyond just having a Qualcomm CPU) is unable to handle increased voltages, well... I'll remind you that lithium is a reactive alkaline metal. Burns and skin grafts hurt.
Elnrik said:
Quick Charge by Qualcomm ups the voltage to as high as 12V, I believe. The fast charging in the new Nexus line is at a constant 5V. If the phone's internals (which goes way beyond just having a Qualcomm CPU) is unable to handle increased voltages, well... I'll remind you that lithium is a reactive alkaline metal. Burns and skin grafts hurt.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This makes buying chargers so difficult. I was on Amazon just to see if I could find a car charger for this and it is difficult to know what won't blow up your phone.
It won't blow up. =)
jackdubl said:
This makes buying chargers so difficult. I was on Amazon just to see if I could find a car charger for this and it is difficult to know what won't blow up your phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would hold off on buying anything just yet. It looks like USB-C to USB-C will be the only way to take advantage of 3A/5V (15W) charging.
osi13 said:
I would hold off on buying anything just yet. It looks like USB-C to USB-C will be the only way to take advantage of 3A/5V (15W) charging.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It looks like USB 3.1 USB-C to USB-C will be the only way to take advantage of 3A/5V (15W) charging.
Fixed.
USB-C, aka - USB Type-C, is the plug type. USB 3.1 is the bus standard with correct voltage/amperage outputs.
Elnrik said:
It looks like USB 3.1 USB-C to USB-C will be the only way to take advantage of 3A/5V (15W) charging.
Fixed.
USB-C, aka - USB Type-C, is the plug type. USB 3.1 is the bus standard with correct voltage/amperage outputs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's pretty much exactly what I said. Here is the best guide I've seen explaining everything.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Nexus6P/comments/3nyd8k/20151008_the_final_word_on_the_nexus_6p5x_fast/
AFAIK USB 3.1 has nothing to do with it.
osi13 said:
That's pretty much exactly what I said. Here is the best guide I've seen explaining everything.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Nexus6P/comments/3nyd8k/20151008_the_final_word_on_the_nexus_6p5x_fast/
AFAIK USB 3.1 has nothing to do with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, yes, I see what you're saying. I just read the spec docs from USB.org about it. Type-C is truly defined outside of the USB 3.1 specs. The USB 3.1 spec sheet makes no reference to Type-C in section 5.2.1.
Haven't made it through the type-c spec doc yet. I'll keep reading.
Can i use a quallacom quick charge charger rated at [email protected] (i guess what turbo power gives is 9v at 1.67A)
P.s both give charging current of nearly 2500ma in ampere app,my original moto charger is not wrking and i am out of warranty
Yes I use my samsung charger (9v 2amp) on my G4 all the time shows as turbo charger when plugged in.
Yes, you can use a QC 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 charger with this phone... although I would HIGHLY recommend only using a QC 3.0 charger if possible, it is much better at delivering variable power needed for quick charging and controlling temperatures in the battery. When you use a QC 1.0 or 2.0 charger, the phone has to step down to that version, which will still charge faster than a "standard" charger, but it will increase battery temperatures while charging significantly which over extended use can reduce the overall life and capacity of the battery.
acejavelin said:
Yes, you can use a QC 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 charger with this phone... although I would HIGHLY recommend only using a QC 3.0 charger if possible, it is much better at delivering variable power needed for quick charging and controlling temperatures in the battery. When you use a QC 1.0 or 2.0 charger, the phone has to step down to that version, which will still charge faster than a "standard" charger, but it will increase battery temperatures while charging significantly which over extended use can reduce the overall life and capacity of the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a charger designed for sd 625 based phone only
airafali said:
Its a charger designed for sd 625 based phone only
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is?
I don't think you understand, there is no charger specifically for the SD625 or any other chipset... this is merely Qualcomm's Quick Charge technology, but Moto/Lenovo didn't want to pay the licensing/royalty or whatever else to call it that, so they call it TurboPower. I have a Qualcomm QC 2.0 adapter here at my desk and if I connect it, it clearly says "TurboPower Connected".
acejavelin said:
What is?
I don't think you understand, there is no charger specifically for the SD625 or any other chipset... this is merely Qualcomm's Quick Charge technology, but Moto/Lenovo didn't want to pay the licensing/royalty or whatever else to call it that, so they call it TurboPower. I have a Qualcomm QC 2.0 adapter here at my desk and if I connect it, it clearly says "TurboPower Connected".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By sd 625 i mean the quickcharge version which sd 625 supports by default...
airafali said:
By sd 625 i mean the quickcharge version which sd 625 supports by default...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, I don't understand what you mean. The SD625 support Quick Charge 3.0, but the charger supplied with the device is a QC 2.0 compliant adapter that is labeled "TurboPower", at least in the US. If I connect a Samsung GS7 to the Moto charger, it shows Fast Charging as well.
I am not trying to be argumentative, but I don't understand what are you trying to say here.
acejavelin said:
Yes, you can use a QC 1.0, 2.0, or 3.0 charger with this phone... although I would HIGHLY recommend only using a QC 3.0 charger if possible, it is much better at delivering variable power needed for quick charging and controlling temperatures in the battery. When you use a QC 1.0 or 2.0 charger, the phone has to step down to that version, which will still charge faster than a "standard" charger, but it will increase battery temperatures while charging significantly which over extended use can reduce the overall life and capacity of the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But Moto g5 plus doesn't support quick charge 3.0. I read somewhere that it supports only quick charge 2.0
McKellen said:
But Moto g5 plus doesn't support quick charge 3.0. I read somewhere that it supports only quick charge 2.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
According to reputable reviews, it's Quick Charge 3.0:
https://www.androidcentral.com/moto-g5-plus
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/03/moto-g5-plus-android-smartphone-review.html
However, "officially" according to Lenovo, it supports Quick Charge 2.0 but even when asked directly they do not state that it does or does not support 3.0.
I have a USB diagnostic device but I don't know if that will tell me the answer, since I don't own a 3.0 capable charger currently.
acejavelin said:
According to reputable reviews, it's Quick Charge 3.0:
https://www.androidcentral.com/moto-g5-plus
https://www.androidheadlines.com/2017/03/moto-g5-plus-android-smartphone-review.html
However, "officially" according to Lenovo, it supports Quick Charge 2.0 but even when asked directly they do not state that it does or does not support 3.0.
I have a USB diagnostic device but I don't know if that will tell me the answer, since I don't own a 3.0 capable charger currently.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read this: https://forum.xda-developers.com/g5-plus/accessories/chargers-t3584554 Why doesn't Moto just tell us which charger should we use?
McKellen said:
I read this: https://forum.xda-developers.com/g5-plus/accessories/chargers-t3584554 Why doesn't Moto just tell us which charger should we use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Honestly? I'm guessing it's a royalty or licensing thing, they can't say "Quick Charge 3.0" because they didn't pay the fee.
Just my guess... I have nothing to back that up.
acejavelin said:
Honestly? I'm guessing it's a royalty or licensing thing, they can't say "Quick Charge 3.0" because they didn't pay the fee.
Just my guess... I have nothing to back that up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever tried the Quick charge 3.0? Some users report that quick charge 3.0 doesn't work. I haven't tried it coz I don't have the QC 3.0 charger
McKellen said:
Have you ever tried the Quick charge 3.0? Some users report that quick charge 3.0 doesn't work. I haven't tried it coz I don't have the QC 3.0 charger
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, don't double post. It's a waste of space, time, and creates pointless threads.
QC3 Chargers can use QC2 to charge devices. Whether or not the phone supports it is irrelevant.
Karlinski said:
Dude, don't double post. It's a waste of space, time, and creates pointless threads.
QC3 Chargers can use QC2 to charge devices. Whether or not the phone supports it is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just asking coz QC 2.0 charger is cheaper then QC 3.0 charger
And both will work fine. A 8 second Google search will tell you this. Try looking before asking!
Karlinski said:
And both will work fine. A 8 second Google search will tell you this. Try looking before asking!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, I know but Acejavelin said: "I would HIGHLY recommend only using a QC 3.0 charger if possible, it is much better at delivering variable power needed for quick charging and controlling temperatures in the battery."
McKellen said:
I know, I know but Acejavelin said: "I would HIGHLY recommend only using a QC 3.0 charger if possible, it is much better at delivering variable power needed for quick charging and controlling temperatures in the battery."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, using "highly" and "much better" here might have been a bit overkill... From 1.0 to 2.0 the difference is huge, from 2.0 to 3.0 not so much, especially on a device like this that isn't drawing a ton of current consistently.
Is a 3.0 charger better for the longevity of the battery, and thus the device, over the long term? Yes. Is it significant enough to pay the extra over a 2.0 charger? That's your call... After a year or so of consistent use it might not even make a significant difference in battery life, it may add a month ot two to the longevity of the phone over it's lifespan, no one can say for sure because each case is unique.
My chargers, except car chargers, far out last my phones, I've had the same charger on my nightstand for 4-5 years now (seriously, it's from a Blackberry Playbook) so it's an investment...
I don't understand the issue here... A good QC 3.0 charger is a few bucks more than a 2.0 charger, and if you look you can get one for $10-$12, so is two or three dollars worth worrying about this?
If you are just concerned about what is best for the battery, never use a quick charger at all...
acejavelin said:
Ok, using "highly" and "much better" here might have been a bit overkill... From 1.0 to 2.0 the difference is huge, from 2.0 to 3.0 not so much, especially on a device like this that isn't drawing a ton of current consistently.
Is a 3.0 charger better for the longevity of the battery, and thus the device, over the long term? Yes. Is it significant enough to pay the extra over a 2.0 charger? That's your call... After a year or so of consistent use it might not even make a significant difference in battery life, it may add a month ot two to the longevity of the phone over it's lifespan, no one can say for sure because each case is unique.
My chargers, except car chargers, far out last my phones, I've had the same charger on my nightstand for 4-5 years now (seriously, it's from a Blackberry Playbook) so it's an investment...
I don't understand the issue here... A good QC 3.0 charger is a few bucks more than a 2.0 charger, and if you look you can get one for $10-$12, so is two or three dollars worth worrying about this?
If you are just concerned about what is best for the battery, never use a quick charger at all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use right now Aukey QC 2.0 charger and I consider buying QC 3.0 charger so thank you for the explanation.
McKellen said:
I use right now Aukey QC 2.0 charger and I consider buying QC 3.0 charger so thank you for the explanation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is my charger at work... If you have a QC 2.0 charger, don't bother getting a new one. If you are buying one, get a 3.0 one.
I know this thread is a little dated and I'm a late comer to this thread, but I just bought the g5 plus on a black friday deal at best buy $300 down to $225, US xt1678 variant, 64gb storage and 4gb ram, I jsut could not resist it for that price, and....it was actually cheaper than the 32gb storage 2gb ram variant which was listed at $229
Anyways on to my question, this is for acejavelin. You said your qc 2.0 worked and came up as showing turbo charging (not just normal charging)? I hope I am reading this correctly. Also is this one of those Qualcomm® Quick Charge 2.0 chargers, that's what I was looking at buying for my car and was curious if it worked. Just checking to make sure I'm reading the thread correctly.
I recently just bought a 2.1 fast charge lighter plugin, but guess what, it doesn't turbocharge only normal charge. I tried with the cord that came with the phone, as well as 2 other cords and still only normal charge for each one.
Now with my wall charger (the provided turbocharger that came with the g5 plus) in the house, all 3 cords work and show as turbocharge as long as I am using the provided moto turbo charge wall charger.
I also was curious and tried an old samsung charger that I used on I think it was the s4, last samsung I owned lol. With my nexus 5x which has USB-C worked wonderfully with it, but sadly turbo charge does not work so well with the samsung wall charger, because it does not show as turbo charge, but only normal charge on the g5 plus.
Hello, i have an aukey usb quick charge 3 charger and now that i have a new xiaomi mi a1 i bought a nillkin usb type c 3.0 quick charge cable.
Even tho i have a charger and a data cable compatible with quick charge, when i charge it says "charging", not fast charging, i don't even sense a notisable decrease of charging time.
So i am doing somethong wrong? It is suppose that with oreo update quick charge is aviable on the mi a1.
tired reply , please search.
The 'fast charging' message was a bug. Congrats. U just waste money
Sad to break it to you, but the phone doesn't support Quick Charge 3.0
Who except pajeet analphabete on Indian blog said it was supposed to get QC?
I've read that one of the Oreo beta builds had quick charging enabled by mistake and Xiaomi removed it later, this is when/where rumors started. No idea if that's true though..
There is a quite big difference between "fast charge" and "quick charge" (by qualcomm). Quick Charge will not be enabled on those phones as qualcomm wants money for each device that uses it. However in oreo we have "fast charge" enabled.... also to have quick charge you'll need charger that has the qualcomm chip in it... and for the fast charge again you'll need charger that supports fast charge(basically that it is more powerful - 34W and up).
And remember it is android one device so it is as close to the aosp as possible and many of the settings are up to google to change (like the cam api 2)
I don't get the fuss around this "fast" charge "enabled" thingy. I'm using a nexus 5x charger since day 0 (back when only displayed "charging") because i've bought it as a replacement for my nexus 5x.
So, the output of the 5x charger has 3A . Now pay attention, the A1 (at least mine and i don't think i got a special edition) was charging with 2A out of the box (nougat) and also after oreo update, period.
Mi a1 does have sd625 which supports fast charging but xiaomi hasnt enabled it cause enabling that will make xiaomi pay some loyalty to snapdragon. So they didn't enable it. NO FAST CHARGING ON MI A1
This thread reminds me of countles indian videos trying to prove redmi phones support fast charging by comparing charging speeds between stock 1A chargers an qc2/3 ones. Good stuff
With custom roms and root, could you re-enable it? Yes.
justanpotato said:
With custom roms and root, could you re-enable it? Yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope.
pendragon666 said:
This thread reminds me of countles indian videos trying to prove redmi phones support fast charging by comparing charging speeds between stock 1A chargers an qc2/3 ones. Good stuff
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Redmi note 5 has the icon of fast charging with micro usb, but Mi A1 with usb C does not, lol. My phone Mi A1 charges fully within 1 hour from 1%(would say... 40min) with an aukey QC 3.0 and a blitzwolf amp usb cable.
bastienff said:
Hello, i have an aukey usb quick charge 3 charger and now that i have a new xiaomi mi a1 i bought a nillkin usb type c 3.0 quick charge cable.
Even tho i have a charger and a data cable compatible with quick charge, when i charge it says "charging", not fast charging, i don't even sense a notisable decrease of charging time.
So i am doing somethong wrong? It is suppose that with oreo update quick charge is aviable on the mi a1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't worry about people bragging ie lying about how their phones charge up faster with quick charge. Or some sort of forced charging is going on which isn't good for the lifespan of the battery. Samsung allows users to turn off fast charging in the settings to reduce excessive heat which says something about fast charging.
So you guys are saying it doesn't support Quick Charge™. But I just downloaded CPU-Z for fun and it read the fact that the MI A1 - My unit at least runs Snapdragon 626 as opposed to what GSMArena says (625) and according to this article it is supposed to support it. I don't have a fast enough charger - Never thought I'd need one since the phone supposedly doesn't support fast charging, but if it runs 626 it might. If I can edit this post I'll add a screenshot from the phone in a moment.
Can't seem to add the screen shot, so here's the link to it:
https://imgur.com/a/PhgdBME
justanpotato said:
With custom roms and root, could you re-enable it? Yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes. I'm using a motorola turbo power charger and a magisk module 'force fast charge'. getting ~2000mA.
The phone has the available hardware for fast charging but xiaomi disabled it, it should be coming soon in oreo or pie
meltbanana said:
yes. I'm using a motorola turbo power charger and a magisk module 'force fast charge'. getting ~2000mA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried that module, but don't see any difference. Plus, I don't see the force fast charge folder in solid explorer anywhere!
WhatzIt2Ya said:
I tried that module, but don't see any difference. Plus, I don't see the force fast charge folder in solid explorer anywhere!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
depends on your charger. :good:
Dang, I JUST BOUGHT 5. QC3 chargers!!!
... I just read on some other forms that the mean one supports fast charging qc3 charger I bought a bunch of chargers. does anyone know will queue c3 chargers work on all types of phones and devices even if they don't have any Qualcomm chip in them will they still charge at your 1 amp or 2 amp speed?? and that's question does anybody know what happened to the license agreement between called come and show me about working out the deal to get the Alt-X low-latency and the Ap-X codec license agreement???