Hi,
There is a really good i9001 wiki and another updated sticky Rom List but still there is no objective information on battery life or performance.
And that is quite annoying because all ROM developers claim that they have coded THE ROM and that it is the best in the whole universe.
Well... turns out it ain't...
And even if it was, it would be nice to see how it compares to the second best or to the previous version of the same ROM.
By resorting to testing with apps like battery spy and benchmarking tools, objective ranking of ROMS would be possible [maybe even a developer app could be developed to include this in ROMS themselves and report data from users if allowed].
I know there is the issue of user profiles being different, etc. thus a ranking wouldn't necessarily apply to every user, but it would be an indicator as the advertised fuel consumtion and horsepower of a car is.
This would be very useful for users navigating the forum in search of their next ROM and for developers also, as it would promote competition with a baseline quality indicator. Surely some would code for fake performance (or avoidance) of this benchmarking but the good, elite developers working on major ROMS would abide by it.
Really good i9001 Wiki:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1374339
http://forum.xda-developers.com/wiki..._Plus/GT-I9001
Updated Sticky i9001 Rom List:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1901212
I'm new to Nexus 4; I'd need a kernel with corrected thermal throttling; no modifications to colors, contrast, gamma etc, but the possibility to correct them manually; good for battery but smooth and eventually with tweaking possibility (like clocks, voltages etc).
Any hint? Thanks!
Hi,
Nexus 4 Original Android Development
All is here, yes it needs some search, some reading (changelogs, list of features, last feedbacks, etc...) and some test by yourself but after that you'll be happy to have found by yourself THE kernel that suits your needs. Personal satisfaction.
Ah, should we choose for you..., yes it seems...
Hello. I'm interested in modifying my nexus 7 setup and installing a new kernel and potentially a new rom because web browsing on stock is a bit sluggish for a rather vanilla android install. So is multitasking while running an idle chroot. From my initial research, custom kernels and different clock settings can accomplish what I'm seeking.
Now here's the thing. I'm also interested in keeping the fantastic battery life that the stock rom and kernel has given me. I'm thinking that I want a rather lean ROM with over clock settings that are a bit more conservative, like It will try to stay at lower clocks when it can, but if a process is constantly pushing the tablet, give it a higher clock until load goes down. Similar to the on demand CPU governor in Linux. Is there a setup you guys would recommend that would give me what I'm looking for?
My boot loader is unlocked and my ROM rooted.
Helios747 said:
Hello. I'm interested in modifying my nexus 7 setup and installing a new kernel and potentially a new rom because web browsing on stock is a bit sluggish for a rather vanilla android install. So is multitasking while running an idle chroot. From my initial research, custom kernels and different clock settings can accomplish what I'm seeking.
Now here's the thing. I'm also interested in keeping the fantastic battery life that the stock rom and kernel has given me. I'm thinking that I want a rather lean ROM with over clock settings that are a bit more conservative, like It will try to stay at lower clocks when it can, but if a process is constantly pushing the tablet, give it a higher clock until load goes down. Similar to the on demand CPU governor in Linux. Is there a setup you guys would recommend that would give me what I'm looking for?
My boot loader is unlocked and my ROM rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, Helios747...
And welcome to XDA...
It is true... there is a a whole slew of kernels and ROMs to choose from... this is both 'a damn nusicance' and it is also 'a delightful wonder'.
But it also means, and there is no real easy way of saying this... you're going to have to experiment for yourself.
Nobody can really say what is best for you... except you.
---------------------
Look at your needs - how you will use your tablet; High Octane Video Games or Low Level Browsing (maybe with a bit of YouTube) - Sleek and Slim - or Fat with Features - or maybe some compromise betwixt the two..
... you obviously know a fair bit about Linux (more than me probably, given your chroot reference), so you're probably better placed than me to make certain choices.
---------------------
XDA moderators have an objection about threads/posts concerning 'best ROMs/kernels'... such debates lead to flame wars, so a specific thread has been created here...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2151963
Post here... and look here also... it's a great resource.
---------------------
The best of luck to you... and hope you find something that works for you.
Rgrds,
Ged.
Closed. We don't allow comparison threads. Try them and see
I was wondering if anyone has done any actual testing between the different popular kernels available for the N4, or even a spread speed with a feature comparison.
With so man different options it hard to tell how they stack up, which have what fixes or what additions applied. I feel like someone should make a sticky that compares the kernels side by side so that newbies/people who are just not technical or great on following what has recently updated, can tell what each option offers.
I know that on the Nexus 7 forum there is a thread where a person applies the same device, ROM and settings to multiple kernels and test battery life in a few separate situations. I'd love to see someone do that for the Nexus 4 as well. I know there are many variables in play, but it can give people an idea of what each kernel provides.
That way people can more easily narrow down what kernels fit their needs/feature desires.
the problem is that different devices react differently to each kernel. one devices great, can be another devices horrible. i do understand your idea though, im not saying its bad, because it is a good idea. its just the results would be accurate(maybe, depends on how tested, for the tester. but could be very inaccurate for another device.
I know that, but at least a tracking spread sheet would be handy for comparisons, and the testing would let people know somewhat what what to expect.
knitler said:
I know that, but at least a tracking spread sheet would be handy for comparisons, and the testing would let people know somewhat what what to expect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you want the most out of a kernel? Battery life, speed, or oc?
I know im repeating another fellow member but not all chips are created equal. It all depends what kinda of use. You could try a kernel and run your tests on it. Then save pictures of the graphs if you can. Then flash a different kernel and make comparisons on them. A good place to start is Faux123 or Franco kernel. Both kernels are developed very well.
I don't think you are following me.
If you want to know what Kernels allow:
Color calibration
Ennhanced audio
built-in wifi fix
underclock to 192mhz
Would you rather read 12-15 threads or just look at a spreadsheet in a sticky on top of the forum, and know what 2-3 to choose from instead of reading all the descriptions and notes?
knitler said:
I don't think you are following me.
If you want to know what Kernels allow:
Color calibration
Ennhanced audio
built-in wifi fix
underclock to 192mhz
Would you rather read 12-15 threads or just look at a spreadsheet in a sticky on top of the forum, and know what 2-3 to choose from instead of reading all the descriptions and notes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just try some kernel`s out and keep the one you like most, is this again one of those disguised `best of` threads? Each user has a different setup (apps, widgets, syncing, roms, mods) so this would not be a test under similar conditions.
knitler said:
I don't think you are following me.
If you want to know what Kernels allow:
Color calibration
Ennhanced audio
built-in wifi fix
underclock to 192mhz
Would you rather read 12-15 threads or just look at a spreadsheet in a sticky on top of the forum, and know what 2-3 to choose from instead of reading all the descriptions and notes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it bugs you so much why don't you make the spreadsheet? It's not like you'd have to learn code or something. Just saying..
knitler said:
Would you rather read 12-15 threads or just look at a spreadsheet in a sticky on top of the forum, and know what 2-3 to choose from instead of reading all the descriptions and notes?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I chose a kernel, I used to manually look through each kernel thread and then just try the kernel myself. Didn't need any fancy spreadsheet or comparison charts.
Plus I have a feeling it would... deter newer kernel developers and misguide newer users. A user sees "X" kernel not having a feature, when 5 other kernels have every feature, and they'll skip right over that kernel, regardless of what benefits it may offer.
espionage724 said:
When I chose a kernel, I used to manually look through each kernel thread and then just try the kernel myself. Didn't need any fancy spreadsheet or comparison charts.
Plus I have a feeling it would... deter newer kernel developers and misguide newer users. A user sees "X" kernel not having a feature, when 5 other kernels have every feature, and they'll skip right over that kernel, regardless of what benefits it may offer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If the kernel has benefits then they would just be listed. You're example doesn't make much sense to me, if a person wants a feature, they yes, they will use a kernel that has that feature. If a person wants to tune the color on their screen why would they NOT get a kernel with that control feature?
knitler said:
If the kernel has benefits then they would just be listed. You're example doesn't make much sense to me, if a person wants a feature, they yes, they will use a kernel that has that feature. If a person wants to tune the color on their screen why would they NOT get a kernel with that control feature?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a few good kernels dont list "features". and some kernels make up names for features to make them sound more then they are, and make it a point to list "features" that really arent. really, its best to try a kernel, as these "feature" lists can be very misleading.
Hello everyone.
I just thought I'd open a new thread in hope I get some comments and/or replies on this topic. What is your current configurations for your device?
I am asking as I have flashed many ROMs and personally like AEX for its fluidity and sleek design. My main point of this thread is so everyone can gather ideas and knowledge of other users and what they use as their daily driver. But I have found every Android Oreo ROM is a battery drainer.
I also use SmartPack-Kernel with my own tweaks. I am struggling with tweaking the interactive governor though and thought this topic would be a good discussion point so we can get the best from our S5s.