Related
I don't see any comparison in this subforum.
Perhaps we can compare and discuss different ROMs
Which do you like and why?
I only really test CyanogenMod 13 and Lineage OS.
Can I add something ---
Which ROM is best for GAMING?
Ah ah I just had the same question. I wondered why there were so many flavors of Lineage Os, and what were the difference. For the moment I have tested only stock (Alxndr's rom) and Lineage 14.1 Official.
- Lineage OS offical is great. The fingerprint recognition is lightning fast, and the rom is globally fast. There are lots of customization and options.
- Stock has however a better battery life, Ultra Power Saving Mode, camera and dialer.
I don't do gaming. However, I can tell the performance in antutu is equivalent (+/- 53.000). Stock had a better 3d score (11.000, vs 8.000 for LOS) and should do better for gaming.
My dream would be a Lineage OS with ported touchwiz framework for edge, camera, sms and dialer. Or a S7 nougat rom with ported LoS fingerprint.
I am running Vaniraosp these days.
htb2050 said:
I am running Vaniraosp these days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And why
I am using LOS at the moment and it blazing quick the only thing is that my phone heats heat up!!
Resurection remix for customisation. Fast and very good battery life base on AOSP.
Envoyé de mon SM-G900F en utilisant Tapatalk
AOKP seems to have everything working that i have come across and gets nightly updates i like Cr Droid but was still getting rotation issue Kltedv hopefully that will be sorted in the next update
Official linage
Tried LOS, Resurrection Remix and crdroid. LOS is good but seems so vanilla in front of RR and crdroid.
I like features. Resurrection Remix has the most features. crdroid is similar but slightly less features, but excellent battery life of all.
I switched back to RR from crdroid in the hopes of getting battery life improvement with boeffla kernel, forcedoze, hebf optimizer, but not seeing it so far. May go back to crdroid.
@freefourlife
Battery life with crDroid so much better? Any disadvantages?
derAndroidler said:
@freefourlife
Battery life with crDroid so much better? Any disadvantages?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Minor additional features in RR. Planning to switch back, as I couldnt get similar battery efficiencies even with custom boeffla kernel
I feel safer and more stable with official lineage OS, but this is only illusion in my head.
freefourlife said:
No. Minor additional features in RR. Planning to switch back, as I couldnt get similar battery efficiencies even with custom boeffla kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are in for a treat for v 2.1 when it will be released. They are improving it a lot in terms of performance and battery life.
based on stock mm, great bat life, nice mods on stock SUPERLite MiNi MM *361mb*
i tested AICP, LOS and CrDroid i want to test AOKP, the most developed was AICP, but the battery life and the ram usage was the worst, but it was the better choice, all the things worked, but i prefer LOS, Crdroid it has a lot of bugs in 2.0, i don't tested the 2.1 but a few users said that the sim card is not detected so i will wait, it has the best battery life compared with the other roms but a lot of things aren't working so it's not the best thing and LOS is vanilla but with little customizations, so it's really cool, the dev's can improve the battery life but, i think that if you use LOS is ok for daily use.
I really like LINEAGE OS official. But I use custom TW roms just because I prefer TW camera . So I hope to use LINEAGE OS with ported TW framework for stock or N7 camera .
tommygun198 said:
based on stock mm, great bat life, nice mods on stock SUPERLite MiNi MM *361mb*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you like TouchWiz?
dokmanXYX said:
i tested AICP, LOS and CrDroid i want to test AOKP, the most developed was AICP, but the battery life and the ram usage was the worst, but it was the better choice, all the things worked, but i prefer LOS, Crdroid it has a lot of bugs in 2.0, i don't tested the 2.1 but a few users said that the sim card is not detected so i will wait, it has the best battery life compared with the other roms but a lot of things aren't working so it's not the best thing and LOS is vanilla but with little customizations, so it's really cool, the dev's can improve the battery life but, i think that if you use LOS is ok for daily use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never tested AICP, but there are daily updates I see.
crDroid has different problems I recognized that, too. And few updates.
I only have a very small test with AOKP, everything seems working.
At the moment using LineAge OS with (nearly) no bugs. Battery life is OK, but not perfect. Performance seems good, no problem at the moment.
But I'm always interested in other ROMs or interesting features etc.
derAndroidler said:
Do you like TouchWiz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why, you can use any launcher you like
I have been using custom rom on this device since i bought it and took it out of the box (4-5 months ago).
To be honest and coming from other "superior" device, in terms of performance this device never disappointed me, for me it's like a "diesel car", you'll not have the power that maybe you are able to get whether you have a device powered by a Snapdragon 800-35 series. But this device ever performs very decently in every task, without major troubles.
Today i used my girlfriend's G4 Plus Dual-SIM XT1641 (totally stock, non-rooted, no anything, besides the lot of trash apps/games and Google bloatware that she has installed) and surprisingly i felt it much more "light/fast", for example when scrolling. So, i decided to make comparissions using the so much hated benchmark test (Geekbench 4 specifically, and AnTuTu 3D).
My results were:
Stock Nougat (7.0 June security patch):
Single-core: 742
Multi-Core: 3081
Stock LineageOS 14.1 (without modifications):
Single-Core: 662
Multi-core: 2314
The stock G4 plus did the test 5 minutes more quickly than the other one (mine XT1641 Single-SIM).
Then, i did the same test with AnTuTu, the result was similar, the stock one scored like a 20% better, and ended the test 3-4 minutes first. But the important thing for me was in the graphics test (GPU), honestly the stock one destroyed my device (running 14.1) in terms of graphic smoothness (FPS). The graphics in my device were really slow and i could see this slowdown in real time (running the test in both devices side to side, in the same time) [5/7FPS less than the stock one].
I use LineageOS 14.1 with his stock kernel, as it comes.
The obvious question:
[Question]: Why this happens?
I ask this because in every device that i owned the results were the opposite, i mean: CyanogenMod/LineageOS was pretty superior than the Stock rom (in terms of performance and even in benchmarking tests).
Don't get me wrong and think that i am complaining about the custom rom performance, in fact, i love (and i'm currently using) custom roms. I am just curious about the reasons of these results.
Your opinions are really welcome.
I never use or trust benchmarks. I always go off by what feels better to me.
reCoded said:
I never use or trust benchmarks. I always go off by what feels better to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Definitely that's te way to go. :good:
I can also say that stock is alot smoother than the custom ROMs. Gaming performance is also better and I've even tried asking why custom ROMs gaming performance suffers compared to stock but no one seems to respond
I've tried LOS and ViperOS on my G4 Plus (XT1640 2gb RAM). The performance was much better with both custom ROM's, It was very snappy, held more apps in memory and was a more pleasant experience. Stock ROM perfoemance is not bad, but I see very clearly that the apps won't stay im memory for long and often I have scrolling lag when using facebook on chrome. For gaming I havent noticed any diference whatsoever.
danilomrx said:
I've tried LOS and ViperOS on my G4 Plus (XT1640 2gb RAM). The performance was much better with both custom ROM's, It was very snappy, held more apps in memory and was a more pleasant experience. Stock ROM perfoemance is not bad, but I see very clearly that the apps won't stay im memory for long and often I have scrolling lag when using facebook on chrome. For gaming I havent noticed any diference whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What games have you tried?.
I've tried bleach brave souls and I get seriously bad lag compared to stock.
Although you are right about stock having bad memory management
yes even i feel the same in custom roms while scrolling or even while pulling the quick settings bar there is a lag but stock rom is pretty smooth and even the battery backup on stock is better than many custom roms but for most of the people thats ok and they dont care about these things and they like the customizations and theme support and many other features that are not available in stock
i personally feel like i can literally see the battery percentage going down in custom roms too fast
krishna8691 said:
yes even i feel the same in custom roms while scrolling or even while pulling the quick settings bar there is a lag but stock rom is pretty smooth and even the battery backup on stock is better than many custom roms but for most of the people thats ok and they dont care about these things and they like the customizations and theme support and many other features that are not available in stock
i personally feel like i can literally see the battery percentage going down in custom roms too fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try the aosp one's like omni, aosp extended, ultra-caf, du, cypher (btw official 4.1 is out), pure nexus, cosmic they are smoother than most of the lineage based one's.
In my opinion, I'm thinking that if you root the phone the performance decreases. The more you do, the more the performance decreases. Stock roms all always better for me.
Will you install an stock rom or stay in linage??
andres88_ said:
In my opinion, I'm thinking that if you root the phone the performance decreases. The more you do, the more the performance decreases. Stock roms all always better for me.
Will you install an stock rom or stay in linage??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am on stock right now, rooted with EX. I obtained the same results as the post (with Geekbench 4). I know that the score isn't really important, anyway, i will use this rom a couple of days, to take better conclusions.
I notice that on stock, I get 5-7 hours of SoT, but on any ROM, even stock aosp, I get 3-4 hours. Quite strange.
I am by no means an expert on this but maybe the Moto stock rom is just much better than most stock ROMs. Where a custom rom may show performance improvements over other custom ROMs, they aren't an improvement over other stick ROMs? I don't know . I think the developers of ROMs for our device have done a fantastic job and I enjoy the customizations the ROMs offer. After having hard bricked my last phone twice (unable to bring back to life the last time), I am sticking with a locked bootloader and stock for awhile. Don't want to have to replace my phone again.
Multi-core: 2330 with Cypheros 7.1.2
MisterSteve said:
I am by no means an expert on this but maybe the Moto stock rom is just much better than most stock ROMs. Where a custom rom may show performance improvements over other custom ROMs, they aren't an improvement over other stick ROMs? I don't know . I think the developers of ROMs for our device have done a fantastic job and I enjoy the customizations the ROMs offer. After having hard bricked my last phone twice (unable to bring back to life the last time), I am sticking with a locked bootloader and stock for awhile. Don't want to have to replace my phone again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agreed, developers like Silesh.Nair, Jleeblanch, vache, and others did amazing jobs here. We are lucky to have devs of that level, because we have ROMs of quality and variety for this device. Thanks for your great opinion.
lCrD512 said:
Try the aosp one's like omni, aosp extended, ultra-caf, du, cypher (btw official 4.1 is out), pure nexus, cosmic they are smoother than most of the lineage based one's.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed OmniROM yesterday, used it for a while, and yes, it runs much more smoother than the LOS based ROMs i've tried, also i did the Geekbench 4 test, the results were: Multi-Core: 3081, Single-Core: 738, hence, the test is not lying (same results as the stock rom).
Still i do not know why the performance of the LOS baseds rom is not like the AOSP ones. I am not saying this only based in the results of a test.
I am currently on RR because i love his customization and features, but i see the difference when i try AOSP in terms of overall performance.
moonlightdrive said:
I installed OmniROM yesterday, used it for a while, and yes, it runs much more smoother than the LOS based ROMs i've tried, also i did the Geekbench 4 test, the results were: Multi-Core: 3081, Single-Core: 738, hence, the test is not lying (same results as the stock rom).
Still i do not know why the performance of the LOS baseds rom is not like the AOSP ones. I am not saying this only based in the results of a test.
I am currently on RR because i love his customization and features, but i see the difference when i try AOSP in terms of overall performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which ROM did you recommend for more battery and performance? Based on your device and your experience.
champagne66601 said:
Which ROM did you recommend for more battery and performance? Based on your device and your experience.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OmniROM, without a doubt. I tried plenty of roms, it's seems to be the only purely AOSP based. This rom performs like the stock one but whit the plus of a better battery life.
The only bad thing about Omni could be that is has not all the features that the LOS based ones offers, like Invicta or RR.
well, that's right. for me stock rom also feels a lot smoother faster and battery life is incredible. best stock software i've seen from motorola. i like custom roms and all the possibilities they bring, and we already have some very stable like invicta, or LOS. but i love this phone on stock (and debloated hehehe)
[20-Aug-2018] NEW: For the ranking table with normalized scores of Oreo Treble Kernels head directly to post #421.
Let me first say that is not a "best rom" thread. There is no absolute best rom. What is best for one user may not be best for another. To give a simple example, battery is very important for some users while performance is priority for others.
Benchmark results are usually misleading, but PC Mark battery life benchmark shines by using day to day tasks to measure phone performance and battery drain. It repeats a series of tasks including web browsing, photo and video editing, text editing and data manipulation.
For each rom I made a clean install and a simple setup with basic settings and a few apps necessary to monitor/admin the runs.
The tests are run with the screen brightness calibrated at 200 lumens as required by PC Mark and all sound levels set to zero, so results are better suited for comparison.
Each benchmark run takes over 8 hours. So this test is also a stability test. Some rom/kernel combinations simply fail to complete the test.
Here is the index of all my mido benchmarks compilations:
Treble Oreo Roms ranking table - post #390.
Latest preview of Treble Kernels - post #413.
Latest preview of Treble Roms - post #343.
Previous preview of kernels benchmarks - post #256.
Previous Kernel normalized scores and ranking tables - post #273.
Non-Treble Oreo & Nougat Roms - post #4.
Previous Compilations - Roms & Kernel - post #5.
04-May-2018 - Kernel Poll Results:
I had 75 votes in my kernel poll. Thanks to you all. Here are the poll results:
# Votes / Kernel
34 FrancoKernel
12 ElectraBlue
09 KudKernel
06 Xenial
04 Velvet
03 Revolt
03 Stormguard
02 None of the above
02 ZPX Inferno
00 Chewy-Weeb
75 Total Votes!
.
Reserved
Reserved
The following is the series of Nougat and non-treble Oreo Roms prepared between February and April 2018.
Let me first say that is not a "best rom" thread. There is no absolute best rom. What is best for one user may not be best for another. To give a simple example, battery is very important for some users while performance is priority for others.
Benchmark results are usually misleading, but PC Mark battery life benchmark shines by using day to day tasks to measure phone performance and battery drain. It repeats a series of tasks including web browsing, photo and video editing, text editing and data manipulation.
For each rom I made a clean install and a simple setup with basic settings and a few apps necessary to monitor/admin the runs.
The tests are run with the screen brightness calibrated at 200 lumens as required by PC Mark and all sound levels set to zero, so results are better suited for comparison.
Each benchmark run takes over 8 hours. So this test is also a stability test. Some rom/kernel combinations simply fail to complete the test.
It took almost three weeks to run these tests with two midos dedicated for it 24/7!
If you want to learn more about PC Mark take a look at the site: PC Mark for Android.
For this compilation I picked the following roms:
RR-N-v5.8.5-20180121-mido-Final by @Alexey71 - Alexey71's Sourceforge
RR-N-v5.8.5-20180128-mido by Luis @8224Freak - [ROM][UNOFFICIAL][7.1.2][NIGHTLY][OTA]Resurrection Remix-5.8.5 for Redmi Note 4
liquid_remix-9.0.4-20180205-OFFICIAL-mido by @nikhil020 - [ROM][OFFICIAL][8.1.0] [MIDO] Liquid Remix [9.0.4][UPDATE 05/02/2018]
AospExtended-v5.1-mido-20180122-1306-OFFICIAL by @[email protected] - [ROM][8.1.0_r11][BETA][AOSP][OFFICIAL] AospExtended ROM V5.2 [DUI][10/02/2018]
crDroidAndroid-8.1-20180203-mido-v4.0-BETA by @Soubhik_sk83 - [ROM][OFFICIAL][OREO 8.1]**crDroid v4.0 BETA**[Redmi Note 4][SD][20180215]
PixelExperience_mido-8.1.0-20180206-1530-OFFICIAL by @nikhil020 - [ROM][OFFICIAL][8.1.0][MIDO] Pixel Experience [AOSP][r1]
RR-O-v6.0.0-20180219-mido-Official by @Adesh15 - [ROM][OFFICIAL] Resurrection Remix v6.0.0 [8.1.0][mido][r1]
RR-O-v6.0.0-20180314-mido-Unofficial by @EndLess - [UNOFFICIAL] Resurrection Remix v6.0.0 [8.1.0][mido]
AOSiP-8.1-Official-mido-20180313 by @Adesh15 - [ROM][8.1.0]Android Open Source Illusion Project[mido][OFFICIAL]
omni-8.1.0-20180325-mido-WEEKLY by @khan_frd2002 - [ROM][OFFICIAL][8.1] OmniRom [STABLE]
lineage-15.1-20180327-Extended-mido by @Alexey71 - Alexey71's AFH LineageOS Extended builds
RR-O-v6.0.0-20180405-mido-Unofficial-LuisROM by @8224Freak - [ROM][UNOFFICIAL][7.1.2][NIGHTLY][OTA]Resurrection Remix-5.8.5 (also Oreo in same thread)
RR-O-v6.0.0-20180407-mido-Unofficial by @EndLess - [UNOFFICIAL] Resurrection Remix v6.0.0 [8.1.0][mido]
Of course I could not use all the latest builds, remember it takes weeks to run all benchmarks.
Enough talk. Now Let's see the results:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Score is a performance index - the higher the better.
SOT (Screen On Time) is an estimate of the number of hours the device may be used until battery drops dead (from 100% to 0%). It's a very good estimate because the test starts with the battery at 86% and ends when the battery drops to 20%.
There is no clear advantage comparing Oreo roms. They all offer similar performance and battery drain.
Nougat RR is still better in both performance and battery drain, again with no expressive advantage over Oreo.
So any of there roms will serve you well and you should pick one based mainly on the features you want.
25-Feb-2018 Update:
Added RR-O Official. Its performance score is similar to other Oreo roms, but SOT is a little behind - 10:37 hours - one hour less than average. Not a big problem because any number over 10 hours is probably good enough for most people.
07-Mar-2018 Update:
Added RR-O Alexey's build. Its performance score and SOT are below other Oreo roms averages. When compared to official RRO SOT is a little better - 11:06 x 10:37 hours and performance score is worse - 4235 x 4763. My benchmark was done with 2018-0303 build and Alexey has a new build almost everyday. I plan to benchmark it again sometime in the future.
24-Mar-2018 Update:
Added @EndLess's RRO and @Adesh15's AOSiP.
This time I broke the results spreadsheet into two, one for Resurrection Remix builds and one for all other Oreo builds.
Adding two more roms once again proves that there is no major difference between Oreo roms. Any one of these roms offers similar performance and battery SOT.
The new RRO build by @EndLess offers the best combination of performance ans battery for Oreo RR. Still Nougat roms have better figures and there is the RRO LuisBUILD by @8224Freak still to be tested.
For the other Oreo roms, the newcomer AOSiP has a slight disadvantage compared to the others. But again this should not influence your choice. Features should be the deciding factor.
03-Apr-2018 Update:
Added @khan_frd2002's Omni and @Alexey71's LineageOS Extended.
Again no surprises. Omni is very fluid, but has slightly less than average SOT. LA Extended has less than average performance and a good SOT.
All tested roms so far are more than capable to serve you well.
14-Apr-2018 Update:
Added RRO by @EndLess 2018-0407 and RRO by @8224Freak LuisBUILD 2018-0405.
RR Oreo roms are evolving, but still RR Nougat roms have better battery/performance.
@EndLess's RRO reached 12 hours SOT, with below average performance - score was 3878.
@8224Freak's has a better compromise of battery/performance, with 11:29 SOT and 4645 performance score.
Thanks @y2ksnoop for the following extra information, based on his usage experience:
The Endless rom has downclocked the CPU to 1.6GHz for better battery life. Though the bench scores are low, there isn't any hiccups in day to usage. The rom is really smooth and games do run fine without heating for a extended time. The thermal management is excellent and the throttling doesn't kick in early. It's the best RR stable build for day to day usage. The next best would be Luis RR Oreo rom which has SE Linux mode enforced by default.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.
This post includes some of my previous compilations. You may find them interesting, but rom and kernel builds are old for obvious reasons.
The following was posted on 14-01-2018, see original post here.
I have just finished testing @Alexey711's Velvet 6.5 kernel that came with RR-N-v5.8.5-20180109-mido-Final new led driver.
Here are the results:
Comparing to Velvet 5.5 battery drain has improved a little and performance is the same.
I did not experience any problems copying files with this build. I use Root Explorer.
Please note that this is not the latest build. Running these benchmarks take a long time and it is difficult to keep up with Alexey711.
The following was posted on 06-01-2018, see original post here.
Here is my latest compilation of PC Mark Battery Life Benchmarks to compare currently available kernels for the Redmi Note 4
If you haven´t read my previous posts and need more info on PC Mark read the explanation at the end of this post.
This time let´s start with the results:
All test were done with @Alexey71's RR-N-v5.8.5-20171219-mido-Final new led driver, using stock kernel and the available custom kernels at this moment.
There is one kernel missing: Stormguard. Unfortunately if failed to complete the benchmarks too many times.
Again there is no clear winner.
if your main goal is battery life and you don't worry about sacrificing some performance your kernel of choice should be Velvet, with an average SOT of 13:28 hours and average performance score of 4092. Good alternatives are Revolt kernel, with 12:52 SOT and 4239 performance, and Xenial kernel, with 12:40 and 4272. Both had more consistent results then Velvet.
If you are looking for the best performance then ZPX Inferno should be your kernel, with an average performance score of 4822 and an average SOT of 12:07 hours. ZPX had almost no variation in SOT between runs, with a mere 0,1% variation.
For a balance between battery and performance the best choices are ElectraBlue, with 4677 and 11:59 and RR Stock kernel, with 4623 and 12:14.
It took almost two weeks to run these tests with two midos dedicated for it 24/7!
This time I calibrated the brightness output of each kernel to 200 lux, as required by PC Mark, so results are better suited for comparison.
Now some words on benchmarks and PC Mark:
Benchmark results are usually misleading, but PC Mark battery life benchmark shines by using day to day tasks to measure phone performance and battery drain. It repeats a series of tasks including web browsing, photo and video editing, text editing and data manipulation.
For these runs I started the benchmarks with battery precisely at 85% and the test automatically stops when battery reaches 20%, so the test consumes 65% of the battery charge. Of course the screen is always on during the whole test.
If you want to learn more about PC Mark take a look at the site: PC Mark for Android.
Where to get the kernels:
Stock/RRN - Alexey71's AFH
Revolt - [Kernel][mido] ReVolt Kernel [Los/Aosp]
ElectraBlue - [KERNEL][mido] ElectraBlue Kernel 8.1 For Redmi Note 4
Xenial - [Kernel][Xenial][Mido]
Velvet - Adesh15's Velvet AFH
ZPX Inferno - ZeroProjectX´s mido AFH
.
svbarbosa said:
Ok. This is the last one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey. Remove my RR and Add PE https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=250537
By default the balance profile (cpu1.6- gpu510), you need to change the profile to perfomance
Alexey71 said:
Hey. Remove my RR and Add PE https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=250537
By default the balance profile (cpu1.6- gpu510), you need to change the profile to perfomance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These benchmarks take so long that I prefer to leave the numbers just for comparison. Even if the rom is not available anymore. Hope you don't mind.
Is there any chance you build RR-O? Your builds are the best and my personal preference is RR. This is no secret.
Such an honor having @Alexey71 and @sachin n as the first two to thank my thread.
svbarbosa said:
Is there any chance you build RR-O? Your builds are the best and my personal preference is RR. This is no secret.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately no, I liked PE
Hey, nice tests! But what about Franco Kernel? Please test it with both Nougat and Oreo... Thx https://forum.xda-developers.com/re...el-francokernel-r1-4th-feb-lineageos-t3744668
https://kernels.franco-lnx.net/RedmiNote4/
Sent from my Redmi Note 4x
Can you add dirty unicorns nougat 11.7.2 version for comparison ?
Alexey71 said:
Unfortunately no, I liked PE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1, hi @AlexY71 is there a thread for your pe?
Thanks, good work
What about stock miui 9.Try to add it next time. any way you did a great job ?
Great work man. Just one note - try to compare the same governors and i/o schedulers. Now, you are comparing a little bit incomparable, cfq vs maple...
Keep it up.
Alexey71 said:
Unfortunately no, I liked PE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there any chance of adding network traffic indicator on your PE builds?
Alexey71 said:
Unfortunately no, I liked PE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice riview bro
Can you do the same test using the official global rom and the official beta rom? Thanks.. Very nice topic!
Alexey71 said:
Unfortunately no, I liked PE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if you change your mind please keep RR-O in the top of your list of "next to build" roms.
sajty said:
Great work man. Just one note - try to compare the same governors and i/o schedulers. Now, you are comparing a little bit incomparable, cfq vs maple...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know. Depending on tweaks the benchmark results may vary a lot. @Zile995 also pointed out that tweaks could have a great impact on results.
But it takes so long to run the benchmarks that I would never finish them if I had to start trying different options for each rom/kernel.
So I have decided to always test the roms and kernels "as they come". No modifications at all. I just leave it up to the devs to decide what is best for their builds.
spasoje.lugonja.3 said:
Hey, nice tests! But what about Franco Kernel? Please test it with both Nougat and Oreo... Thx https://forum.xda-developers.com/re...el-francokernel-r1-4th-feb-lineageos-t3744668
https://kernels.franco-lnx.net/RedmiNote4/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kevin Saiza said:
Can you add dirty unicorns nougat 11.7.2 version for comparison ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mithun mpk said:
What about stock miui 9.Try to add it next time. any way you did a great job
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
drakylucas said:
Can you do the same test using the official global rom and the official beta rom? Thanks.. Very nice topic!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will try my best to accommodate requests, but no promises.
Too many roms and kernels and too little time.
I've tried AICP and lineage, both Oreo. Both had just don't run well when compared to stock ROMs. I see an OG pixel with similar hardware operate as smooth as butter. Any smooth ROMs?
daevion0 said:
I've tried AICP and lineage, both Oreo. Both had just don't run well when compared to stock ROMs. I see an OG pixel with similar hardware operate as smooth as butter. Any smooth ROMs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi. I am currently with aosp extended 5.4 and it works very well between this and Validus 1.7 I think they are the best I've tried, in my opinion.
Oreo for our device as of now isn't in good state if you want the stability. Big battery drain and some minor different problems here and there are present in every oreo rom.
I'd suggest some stable nougat roms like omnirom, mokee or paranoidandroid. Battery life is good and phone feels perfect in everyday usage.
Aicp is one of the smoothest very good in nearly every way as is aosp extended,lineage,RR,aosip,validus and some I've missed (all oreo)are really good.I don't experience the lag and instability and battery is pretty good too.
Fortunately there are too many roms for our beloved device these days. So the aim of this thread is to review and compare available roms. Please share your experience: battery life, smoothness, depth of customization, bugs, etc.
pixel ROM ，very good，Can try, the core is not very good, you can replace
I tested AOSIP, Derpfest, LOS, Havoc, Pixel, Candy, CRDRUID and AEX. They are all good and promising. Some need more work.
Customization: Pixel=LOS<Derpfest=AOSIP=Candy=CR=AEX=Viper<Havoc<RR
Battery: Havoc, AEX, CR and AOSIP with AFRKernel are better choices.
Smoothness: I liked AOSIP the most followed by Derpfest, Havoc, and CR.