Question regarding flashing Cataclysm mod on Feb update when it's out - Nexus 6P Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Hey all... Just a simple question... I have the Cataclysm mod .zip from jan5 measuring around 35mb.... Would like to know if I flash the same over the Feb update when the same comes out... Would the same work and I'll get all the features on that or not.....
Would be trying nonetheless but wanted to know....

likely no.

I had the same question... if no is no - great... just want to rephrase it...
My understanding of the Cata MOD - is that it installs on top of stock. If that is the case, when the FEB security update is released why not install it as originally planned for the Cataclysm updates? (where the vendor.img was NOT included)...
In theory this may work? IF not - why?

Ok - I'm going to grab the February release and take the approach of only flashing the CATA MOD file ontop of the system/vendor images... I'll report back here if it works... as stated I believe in theory it should work just fine.
Would be a great way to continue to enjoy CATACLYSM ROM... best ROM out there...

luigidk said:
Ok - I'm going to grab the February release and take the approach of only flashing the CATA MOD file ontop of the system/vendor images... I'll report back here if it works... as stated I believe in theory it should work just fine.
Would be a great way to continue to enjoy CATACLYSM ROM... best ROM out there...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please make sure to report back, I'm curious about this too. I'm fairly sure it isn't the best idea, though

redsmith said:
Please make sure to report back, I'm curious about this too. I'm fairly sure it isn't the best idea, though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll do a nandroid backup first.
Then - will flash the new system.img, the CATA MOD, then the new Vendor.img... based on my previous notes on how to install just the MOD file - this SHOULD work. I suppose one gotcha may be if the kernel needs to change - in that case I'd just immediatly flash a custom kernel over the stock cata kernel that comes with the MOD flash. I use GOD's Kernel - http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6p/orig-development/kernel-t3276585
I note that the boot image and radio images have not changed in this release - so we're talking pretty straightforward testing here!
My understanding was that Atl4ntis developed the MOD file just for this reason - and also decoupled the CATA MOD work from the main stock rom. The end result was a unique ROM whereas it truly 'sat on top' of stock...
This is one reason I liked the rom so much - it was for all purposes a stock ROM - with the bells and whistles that CATA had - sitting on top as extras... at least that is how I looked at it.
IF this doesn't work - I'm likely just going to go back to stock ROM anyway as I don't trust anyother ROM's stability - based on past experience - CATA is the ONLY ROM that was stock-stable.
Still frustrated that people on this site killed Cataclysm for us.... Whatever political crap that was going on was BS - here was a GREAT developer who just plain delivered and delivered and delivered... and made things better for many of us. To be slammed in any way or manner is beyond petty.

luigidk said:
I'll do a nandroid backup first.
Then - will flash the new system.img, the CATA MOD, then the new Vendor.img... based on my previous notes on how to install just the MOD file - this SHOULD work. I suppose one gotcha may be if the kernel needs to change - in that case I'd just immediatly flash a custom kernel over the stock cata kernel that comes with the MOD flash. I use GOD's Kernel - http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6p/orig-development/kernel-t3276585
I note that the boot image and radio images have not changed in this release - so we're talking pretty straightforward testing here!
My understanding was that Atl4ntis developed the MOD file just for this reason - and also decoupled the CATA MOD work from the main stock rom. The end result was a unique ROM whereas it truly 'sat on top' of stock...
This is one reason I liked the rom so much - it was for all purposes a stock ROM - with the bells and whistles that CATA had - sitting on top as extras... at least that is how I looked at it.
IF this doesn't work - I'm likely just going to go back to stock ROM anyway as I don't trust anyother ROM's stability - based on past experience - CATA is the ONLY ROM that was stock-stable.
Still frustrated that people on this site killed Cataclysm for us.... Whatever political crap that was going on was BS - here was a GREAT developer who just plain delivered and delivered and delivered... and made things better for many of us. To be slammed in any way or manner is beyond petty.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
didnt work... started from scratch and flashed the stock system image with having the userdata formatted as wel... then proceeded to flash the cata mod (JAN5) update almost around 35mb.... also had checked previously that it had it's own boot.img so after flashing cataMOD.. went to bootloader and flashed the stock boot.img...
came up and got stuck at android bootlogo.... waited 15mins and went to stock again.... but there is some light at the end of the tunnel... i was using slimROM devloper's @Yank555 rom(YAOSP) is freaking awesome and the most stable.... also has my beloved feature "SLIMDIM" which dim's the nagiation bar...
here is the link:-
https://twitter.com/yank555lu >>> for following development...
and the Android-fileHost link:-
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=45668

rohit25 said:
didnt work... started from scratch and flashed the stock system image with having the userdata formatted as wel... then proceeded to flash the cata mod (JAN5) update almost around 35mb.... also had checked previously that it had it's own boot.img so after flashing cataMOD.. went to bootloader and flashed the stock boot.img...
came up and got stuck at android bootlogo.... waited 15mins and went to stock again.... but there is some light at the end of the tunnel... i was using slimROM devloper's @Yank555 rom(YAOSP) is freaking awesome and the most stable.... also has my beloved feature "SLIMDIM" which dim's the nagiation bar...
here is the link:-
https://twitter.com/yank555lu >>> for following development...
and the Android-fileHost link:-
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=45668
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you also flash the vendor.img after flashing the CATAMOD?

luigidk said:
Did you also flash the vendor.img after flashing the CATAMOD?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope

Hi, worked for me.
I manually flashed the latest factory images. (bootloader, radio, recovery, boot, system, cache, vendor, userdata)
Then I flashed twrp.
Booted into twrp and installed latest Cat-Mod, SuperSU 2.52, franco-r9.
Rebooted into bootloader and flashed vendor again and formatted userdata.
Hope this helps,
Pat

myuzi said:
Hi, worked for me.
I manually flashed the latest factory images. (bootloader, radio, recovery, boot, system, cache, vendor, userdata)
Then I flashed twrp.
Booted into twrp and installed latest Cat-Mod, SuperSU 2.52, franco-r9.
Rebooted into bootloader and flashed vendor again and formatted userdata.
Hope this helps,
Pat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can confirm that everything works... i guess flashing the vendor did the trick...

myuzi said:
Hi, worked for me.
I manually flashed the latest factory images. (bootloader, radio, recovery, boot, system, cache, vendor, userdata)
Then I flashed twrp.
Booted into twrp and installed latest Cat-Mod, SuperSU 2.52, franco-r9.
Rebooted into bootloader and flashed vendor again and formatted userdata.
Hope this helps,
Pat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great news!
- with the bootloader being the same, as well as the radio - is there a need to flash anything other than system.img, CATA MOD, and vendor.img.
- also - why did you manually flash, rather than flash the images with TWRP? (note, when flashing images with TWRP I see an option to install to either boot or recovery - and I'm still trying to determine which to use... in the meantime I'm installing the drivers on my PC so I can manually flash also.
- for manually flashing - can you flash in order: system.img, catamod, vendor.img? without rebooting between steps? (I figure I can flash a kernel later in TWRP)

myuzi said:
Hi, worked for me.
I manually flashed the latest factory images. (bootloader, radio, recovery, boot, system, cache, vendor, userdata)
Then I flashed twrp.
Booted into twrp and installed latest Cat-Mod, SuperSU 2.52, franco-r9.
Rebooted into bootloader and flashed vendor again and formatted userdata.
Hope this helps,
Pat
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a question though.. i somehow have decrypted my phone... is any adversity of the same.. should i encrypt it back again.. and if yes.. how...

luigidk said:
Great news!
- with the bootloader being the same, as well as the radio - is there a need to flash anything other than system.img, CATA MOD, and vendor.img.
- also - why did you manually flash, rather than flash the images with TWRP? (note, when flashing images with TWRP I see an option to install to either boot or recovery - and I'm still trying to determine which to use... in the meantime I'm installing the drivers on my PC so I can manually flash also.
- for manually flashing - can you flash in order: system.img, catamod, vendor.img? without rebooting between steps? (I figure I can flash a kernel later in TWRP)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey.. the catamod would be flashed from twrp.. would suggest taking the steps that work.. should be simpler..

rohit25 said:
hey.. the catamod would be flashed from twrp.. would suggest taking the steps that work.. should be simpler..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed - and more consistent - don't have to check whether all images need flashing!
Did you flash CATAMOD last - or before Vendor (I can't remember if it matters!)

luigidk said:
agreed - and more consistent - don't have to check whether all images need flashing!
Did you flash CATAMOD last - or before Vendor (I can't remember if it matters!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
catmod first.. i had the jan6 variant so that had the vendor in it... then had to boot to bootloader and then flash vendor again.....

rohit25 said:
a question though.. i somehow have decrypted my phone... is any adversity of the same.. should i encrypt it back again.. and if yes.. how...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I should have been more clear. I always format userdata before booting into android, so the phone will be decrypted. The choice is yours if you want to encrypt or not. There really isn't much benefit to decrypt on the 6P since it's plenty fast as is. I'm just a creature of habit.

I've successfully upgraded to MMB29Q - and have stayed on CATACLYSM ROM - using the last CATA MOD.
For me this is a big deal as it is the first time I've done a manual update using fastboot commands. but thanks to everyone in XDA - went very well (Note: I've always used some type of toolkit in the past, or everything was already baked into a FULL ROM install...)
Also - first time I'm going 100% no root - so I can keep running AP
I flashed these images from the MMB29Q image - in order:
- bootloader.img
- radio.img
- boot.img
- system.img
- booted into recovery:
- used TWRP to flash CATA MOD
- booted back to bootloader:
- flashed vendor.img
- used TWRP to flash a permissive kernel (God's Kernel)
- used TWRP to copy/chmod the latest HOSTS file from ADAWAY (no longer using Adaway directly as I'm not running root)
- used TWRP to flash latest V4A install (atmos/sony version)
- used TWRP to flash sony music player install
- rebooted
everything is 100% - no root - AP working and CATA enhancements in place

luigidk said:
I've successfully upgraded to MMB29Q - and have stayed on CATACLYSM ROM - using the last CATA MOD.
For me this is a big deal as it is the first time I've done a manual update using fastboot commands. but thanks to everyone in XDA - went very well (Note: I've always used some type of toolkit in the past, or everything was already baked into a FULL ROM install...)
Also - first time I'm going 100% no root - so I can keep running AP
I flashed these images from the MMB29Q image - in order:
- bootloader.img
- radio.img
- boot.img
- system.img
- booted into recovery:
- used TWRP to flash CATA MOD
- booted back to bootloader:
- flashed vendor.img
- used TWRP to flash a permissive kernel (God's Kernel)
- used TWRP to copy/chmod the latest HOSTS file from ADAWAY (no longer using Adaway directly as I'm not running root)
- used TWRP to flash latest V4A install (atmos/sony version)
- used TWRP to flash sony music player install
- rebooted
everything is 100% - no root - AP working and CATA enhancements in place
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looks good... and not using toolkits is big WIN... manual is much better..

Related

[STOCK ROM BACKUP] 2.1 Éclair (V20E Baltic)

Stock Android 2.1 Éclair Recovery Backup! V20E Baltic
This is a Recovery Backup of Android 2.1 V20E Baltic ROM. All files in this rom are freshly extracted from the V20E_00.kdz update file, converted from .mbn to .img, ready to be flashed using Clockwork Recovery. No mods, just untouched stock ROM ^_^ Also, Remember to Wipe/Data factory reset before flashing to AVOID BOOTLOOPS!
NOTE: THIS IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH MODIFIED PARTITION SIZES
(If you flashed Mur4ik's 250MB Data KDZ, YOU CANNOT USE THIS BACKUP! You will need to flash a regular Fastboot ROM using KDZ Updater to reverse the partition size change.)
FAQ:
Q: I get stuck at the Android boot logo after I flashed this. Is my device bricked?
A: No, you ignored the above and forgot to factory reset. Go into recovery, factory reset and reboot. Your phone will now fully boot.
NOOB: THIS BACKUP BRICKED MY DEVICE! (Believe me, people say this-.-)
A: Not possible. I cannot brick your device with this. Go away.
Q: Are there any mods to this ROM?
A: No. It is 100% stock.
Q: Why don't I just downgrade using KDZ?
A: Because if your PC dies during flashing, congrats on your new brick (I know the chances are slim, but hey, better to be safe, right?)
Download:
Download from MegaUpload
Size: Roughly 110.39MB (Compressed .zip)
Roughly 222MB (Uncompressed)
MD5: b17bf5ee2ef91f58ab78d07ce6a59945
Any questions? Just ask below.
Jack
thanks flashed that before rma - accepted good to use as development soruce - good work,bro ! love that !
mikegapinski said:
thanks flashed that before rma - accepted good to use as development soruce - good work,bro ! love that !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problems, thanks!
Also added information on how to get original partition sizes back.
Jack
JackG256 said:
Stock Android 2.1 Éclair Recovery Backup! V20E Baltic
This is a Recovery Backup of Android 2.1 V20E Baltic ROM. All files in this rom are freshly extracted from the V20E_00.kdz update file, converted from .mbn to .img, ready to be flashed using Clockwork Recovery. The only modification to this ROM is that I have added Cyanogen's APN list, which allows this ROM to be compatible, out of the box, with your Mobile Data and saves you having to your settings again. (Some carrier's settings may not be included, Check Cyanogen's APN list) Also, Remember to Wipe/Data factory reset before flashing to AVOID BOOTLOOPS!
NOTE: THIS IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH MODIFIED PARTITION SIZES
(If you flashed Mur4ik's 250MB Data KDZ, YOU CANNOT USE THIS BACKUP! You will need to flash an original Fastboot ROM using KDZ Updater to reverse the partition size change.)
Download:
Download from MegaUpload
Size: 110.75MB (.zip)
Roughly 222MB (Uncompressed)
MD5: 8305e31a1bdb571fd59a7db787acb6c1
Any questions? Just ask below.
Jack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know this is newer but why is it special? How is it different compared to other stock ROMs?
nibras_reeza said:
I know this is newer but why is it special? How is it different compared to other stock ROMs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not special, It just includes bugfixes or other. It's just better to have the newer software I guess. Meh, I only made the recovery backup for people to get back to 2.1 if they want, Because using KDZ could brick your phone. (The chances are slim, but it happens.)
Jack
Slightly OT:
JackG256 said:
It's not special, It just includes bugfixes or other. It's just better to have the newer software I guess. Meh, I only made the recovery backup for people to get back to 2.1 if they want, Because using KDZ could brick your phone. (The chances are slim, but it happens.)
Jack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you know what I've never understood? What is a Baltic rom? And what is the difference ? LOL
Jamielawther said:
Slightly OT:
Do you know what I've never understood? What is a Baltic rom? And what is the difference ? LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Baltic ROM was designed for the countries in the Baltic areas (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) but it can be used for all over the world. I used Baltic instead of CIS as Baltic doesn't come with the CIS apps (like Yandex or other crapware) also I don't know the real differences but I think that it is just bugfixes and such.
KDZ updater is a tool used by LG customer care, right? In that case, it would be safer than recovery.
I guess they updated the Kernel as well. In any case, am using Swiftdroid. Thanks for the recovery images though. xD
JackG256 said:
The Baltic ROM was designed for the countries in the Baltic areas (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) but it can be used for all over the world. I used Baltic instead of CIS as Baltic doesn't come with the CIS apps (like Yandex or other crapware) also I don't know the real differences but I think that it is just bugfixes and such.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah , Going back to Baltic now then
Also , Do you know how I could install a theme for 2.1? All the ones I have from 4.pda use Metamorph , which reboots my phone whilst replacing framework-res , is there any way I can stop this or not use metamorph? I think it's the enoch theme , but no theme has ever worked
nibras_reeza said:
KDZ updater is a tool used by LG customer care, right? In that case, it would be safer than recovery.
I guess they updated the Kernel as well. In any case, am using Swiftdroid. Thanks for the recovery images though. xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, LG use R&D Test tool (I think) but Test Tool/KDZ reflashes the bootloader whenever you use it. Whereas recovery doesn't, which makes it safer because if the phone dies when flashing an image in recovery, you can just reflash it as the bootloader goes un-touched, but if your phone or computer dies during a test tool or KDZ flash, you now have a brick with a screen and buttons. Recovery is much, much, much safer, but LG don't use it as it is un-official software. LG also use it because if they upgrade your phone from 1.6 to 2.1, the bootloader needs to be reflashed and updated.
Also, these images are useful if you want to create 2.1 roms or go back to 2.1, say if your phone's screen broke etc.
Jack
JackG256 said:
No, LG use R&D Test tool (I think) but Test Tool/KDZ reflashes the bootloader whenever you use it. Whereas recovery doesn't, which makes it safer because if the phone dies when flashing an image in recovery, you can just reflash it as the bootloader goes un-touched, but if your phone or computer dies during a test tool or KDZ flash, you now have a brick with a screen and buttons. Recovery is much, much, much safer, but LG don't use it as it is un-official software. LG also use it because if they upgrade your phone from 1.6 to 2.1, the bootloader needs to be reflashed and updated.
Also, these images are useful if you want to create 2.1 roms or go back to 2.1, say if your phone's screen broke etc.
Jack
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True about dying during boot-loader flashing but boot loader is small and it usually gets flashed within a minute or so. As per recovery, there is a higher chance of errors when flashing. I agree about your point. As long as recovery and bootloader are working, no matter what happens to system or boot, you could fix it.
I tried to flash this, also wiped cache, data and dalvik, but I'm getting boot loops.. I made a backup before so I reverted the changes... here's what I did:
copied into clockwork's backup folder, rebooted into clockwork mode, flashed and wiped cache, data and dalvik.. result: boot loops
any help?
thanks
denzig said:
I tried to flash this, also wiped cache, data and dalvik, but I'm getting boot loops.. I made a backup before so I reverted the changes... here's what I did:
copied into clockwork's backup folder, rebooted into clockwork mode, flashed and wiped cache, data and dalvik.. result: boot loops
any help?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, I was going to fix it but forgot, i'll do it now. Just give me 20 mins to upload and that.
Jack
Fixed version now uploaded, turns out it was a problem with the boot.img, all is resolved.
Jack
Thank you for the backup!
Maybe I will flash it. CM7 is slow for me.
Thank you so much, will try it later and post the results..
I have the same problems than denzig, my phone restarts after the LG's logo. Does a solution exist ?
Mat11
Uploaded another fixed version-.- If this doesn't work I will cry myself to sleep (/facepalm). (Joking about the crying myself to sleep bit by the way.)
Enjoy!
Jack
I flashed this but I immediately flashed infernal kernel so didn't get any boot loops... I've now realised why I stopped using Baltic ROMs - Google Navigation insists on using the US TTS. It's a roundabout NOT a circle
Still nice to have in my "ROM museum" though - thanks Jack!

MOTOACTV ROMs

Rooting and updating your MotoActv is about to get significantly easier! No more waiting games for developers to update their ROMs or tools when Motorola pushes a new OTA; now you can do it yourself! I honestly have not seen these types of files ANYWHERE else, so I had to create these myself (with quite a bit of help from [mbm]). But enough blabbing, here are the files and how to use them:
(Note: all these methods assume we have full fastboot access! -- Which we still have at this point)
- Stock Images:
These are not just mere update.zips that you might be accustomed to elsewhere in Android. Nor are these mere fxzs that you might be accustomed to elsewhere with newer Motorola devices. They are in fact both and more. There are 3 main ways to flash these files onto your device, giving you options based on what OS you run and how comfortable you are flashing files to your device.
1) FXZ:
- Operating System: Windows
- Requires: RSD Lite with FXZ Support
- Instructions: Simply load up the file as any standard fxz (it is very straight-forward)
2) Recovery:
- Operating System: Anything that can mount your device
- Requires: The ability to get into recovery
- Instructions: Place the file on the sdcard, boot into recovery, flash as normal
- Note: Recovery does not wipe your device, it is suggested that you do so before flashing stock images
3) Fastboot:
- Operating System: Windows/Linux/Mac
- Instructions (Windows): Unpack the zip, run flash-all.bat (if it fails, run as administrator)
- Instructions (Linux/Mac): Unpack the zip, run flash-all.sh (it should already have proper permissions)
Miscellaneous Images:
These miscellaneous images are nothing you haven't seen before at this point, but their purposes are new, so they too require explanation.
1) AnyRoot:
AnyRoot is based on koush's AnyKernel in the sense that it unpacks and repacks the boot.img on the fly. However, as the name suggests, AnyKernel is meant for kernels, while AnyRoot, actually roots the device on the fly. This will work on any MotoActv device. It is flashed as a normal update.zip and everything is done in the background so you won't noticed much. However, for ease of access, the stock and rooted boot.img is exported to your sdcard in /sdcard/recovery/. Also note, that if you happen to flash AnyRoot over an already rooted device, nothing will happen as it has built-in error checking.
2) rebootRecovery:
rebootRecovery is another fxz type zip, the same as the stock and rooted images, except it can't be flashed in recovery (would be a little redundant don't you think?). This flashes a specially made misc.img by [mbm] that tells the device to reboot into recovery from boot. This means you can flash AnyRoot on any stock device.
How Tos / FAQs:
Now that you know what the files do, I can explain in short steps how to use these files to get what you want:
1) How to Return the Device to Stock?
- flash a stock image using any of the 3 methods
- you can now update via Motocast if you so wish
2) How to Root a Stock Device?
- update your device via Motocast to the latest version (suggested)
- place AnyRoot on your sdcard
- boot into fastboot, and flash rebootRecovery using either of the 2 methods
- flash AnyRoot in recovery
- reboot
3) How do I update my Rooted Device?
- flash a stock image using any of the 3 methods
- update your device via Motocast to the latest version
- place AnyRoot on your sdcard
- boot into fastboot, and flash rebootRecovery using either of the 2 methods
- flash AnyRoot in recovery
- reboot
Q: After using rebootRecovery I can't get out of recovery!?
A: You are using an old recovery that doesn't clear the 'reboot-recovery' command; use the newer recovery: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5849675/android/f100/CWMR5x_F100_recoveryB2.img
Q: What do these ROM offer over other custom ROMs?
A: Nothing, they are simply stock images, but you can upgrade with them.
Q: How much battery should I have when I flash?
A: Performing any kind of these flashes will drain at least 10% of your battery, I wouldn't suggest you flash below 60% ESPECIALLY IF YOU FLASH rebootRecovery!
Q: What happens if I flash a 16gb zip on my 8gb or visa-versa?
A: Don't freak, it will still boot, but it's not the best thing in the world to do, just go back and flash the correct model zip.
Q: Can I extract the images from your zips and flash them my own way?
A: yep (couldn't really think of anything else to say)
Q: I manually flashed the stock-boot.img from AnyRoot, and now I can't update. Why?!
A: The boot.imgs need to be truncated before they can be flashed to correctly work with Motorola's updates, just use the stock images.
Q: What's next?
A: HyprActv -- What's this?
Stock Images (w/ md5sums):
8gb-NA: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5849675/android/f100/MA_1710_8GB_NA.zip (5e228bf56a67aced012c8cbb2d7f7c76)
16gb-NA: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5849675/android/f100/MA_1710_16GB_NA.zip (21b067dc629f7ccd18b43799d8d5fb17)
8gb-EU: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5849675/android/f100/MA_1710_8GB_EU.zip (5b79a46d87728303fc2c920eec71c2e8)
Miscellaneous Images (w/ md5sums:
AnyRoot: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5849675/android/f100/MA_AnyRoot.zip (2f867b006da42865ef861094db0eb6e6)
Reboot Recovery: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/5849675/android/f100/MA_RebootRecovery.zip (1623c9c61462db9bb20b55bc8f1144aa)
Mirror (thanks Iownox!): http://www.androtransfer.com/?developer=lownox&folder=MotoACTV
This is Reserved.
I rooted and flashed in recovery (the stock 4.55.97 and the the rooted version 4.55.97) and I stay on 4.55.78 no matter what! The flashes go through successfully... But nothing has changed and the System version still says 4.55.78... But like I said, the flashes both completed! I did a factory reset... and the updater-script wipes system, so what could be my issue?
Moose8106 said:
I rooted and flashed in recovery (the stock 4.55.97 and the the rooted version 4.55.97) and I stay on 4.55.78 no matter what! The flashes go through successfully... But nothing has changed and the System version still says 4.55.78... But like I said, the flashes both completed! I did a factory reset... and the updater-script wipes system, so what could be my issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It sounds like you flashed that old boot.img. Do you have the battery percentage in the status bar? According to TheEndGame7 that is another surefire way to tell if you are on 4.55.97, if you used any of the root tools, it's possible that they automatically flash the old boot.img.
CEnnis91 said:
It sounds like you flashed that old boot.img. Do you have the battery percentage in the status bar? According to TheEndGame7 that is another surefire way to tell if you are on 4.55.97, if you used any of the root tools, it's possible that they automatically flash the old boot.img.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I did flash the old boot.img (root tools :O ). I'll try flashing the modified boot img again. Thanks! I had no idea the root tool took me back to the old boot img
Moose8106 said:
I think I did flash the old boot.img (root tools :O ). I'll try flashing the modified boot img again. Thanks! I had no idea the root tool took me back to the old boot img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, any and all tools that exist so far will need to be updated.
I wiped data / cache and used recovery (b) to install the rooted-4.55.97 zip and didn't have any luck either. I did not use the root tools to flash. Also wiped dalvik cache after and fastboot -w for fun.
innovatelife said:
I wiped data / cache and used recovery (b) to install the rooted-4.55.97 zip and didn't have any luck either. I did not use the root tools to flash. Also wiped dalvik cache after and fastboot -w for fun.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you end up doing any restore of some kind after you flashed?
Update
There are "new" instructions that might fix the issue where the rooted 4.55.97 appears to not flash. Simply wipe the boot.img image before you flash. And don't use the root tools until they are updated.
Also, if you have success, please post it. Usually "Thanks, it works" is annoying, but in this case where I don't have the device, I need to make sure this is working on some level.
I formated everything from recovery, now I got stuck with Moto logo with no animation when it starts, how to get out of this?
NA
Is there any mirrors for the download of these roms? the dropbox links are down
NORCALkID said:
Is there any mirrors for the download of these roms? the dropbox links are down
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They were pulled, they're not working. There has been some form of mis-communication when I did my testing. I am not working on these until I can get the device from utkanos. Check Update 2, in the initial post.
Success
CEnnis91
I was lucky the second time, first time I succeeded to upgrade to rooted 4.55.97 but for some reason I didn't get the battery percentage on the status bar but all other issues are OK and status indicated version number 4.55.97, I repeated flash from recovery but after wiping and remounting all folders, this time for stock 4.55.97
Now I'm on stock 4.55.97 with battery percent on status bar and syncing from my mac.
thanks CEnnis91
NA
I went into recovery>mounts, and didn't see any wipe for boot. I took a shot at system since I had already wiped cache and data. Didn't seem to help either. Tried 'fastboot erase boot" and re-flashed. No go. Couldn't start back up the device at all. Tried flashing the latest rooted image using "fastboot flash boot boot.img". No go.
I messed around trying to get the device to boot back up for a while, but it won't even charge right. Only charges long enough to kick off the Motorola 'M', and that is it. On attempts at loading fastboot, I just keep getting an error saying that the battery is low. I know I can only blame myself for this. No fastboot access and no adb access. All attempts at resetting the device have failed.
Before I attempted all of this, my battery was full. Unfortunately, wouldn't charge anymore even plugged into the wall. Any ideas?
Hopefully nobody else makes my mistake.
Man I can't wait till this is perfect, you guys are fricken awesome. I raped your thanks buttons op lol
MoPhoACTV Initiative
Will be working on this tonight. I just found out how to make the flash script clear cache and dalvik for you, pre-install. That'll probably save some headache, but it works only in edify format. Not sure what the stock recovery uses...
Anyways, I'm home!
ClearD said:
Will be working on this tonight. I just found out how to make the flash script clear cache and dalvik for you, pre-install. That'll probably save some headache, but it works only in edify format. Not sure what the stock recovery uses...
Anyways, I'm home!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All recoveries will now use edify, amend is old and depreciated, you will only find that on old devices.
Corrupt Kernel...
innovatelife said:
I went into recovery>mounts, and didn't see any wipe for boot. I took a shot at system since I had already wiped cache and data. Didn't seem to help either. Tried 'fastboot erase boot" and re-flashed. No go. Couldn't start back up the device at all. Tried flashing the latest rooted image using "fastboot flash boot boot.img". No go.
I messed around trying to get the device to boot back up for a while, but it won't even charge right. Only charges long enough to kick off the Motorola 'M', and that is it. On attempts at loading fastboot, I just keep getting an error saying that the battery is low. I know I can only blame myself for this. No fastboot access and no adb access. All attempts at resetting the device have failed.
Before I attempted all of this, my battery was full. Unfortunately, wouldn't charge anymore even plugged into the wall. Any ideas?
Hopefully nobody else makes my mistake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a classical case of a corrupt Kernel. Not that the images are corrupt, but somewhere along your update, your boot.img did not install the kernel properly and now you have a broken power manager within kernel.
What I would do is the following:
Hook your watch to the charger and let the M sign show up.
Even if it hangs on the M, leave your watch hooked over night.
Try downloading an older image and use fastboot to erase everything and then flash everything back again. This should return your watch to a working state again.
You may then choose to customize it as you see fit.
Root tool > "return to stock"
Sent from my HTC Inspire 4G using XDA-funded carrier pigeons
simx said:
CEnnis91
I was lucky the second time, first time I succeeded to upgrade to rooted 4.55.97 but for some reason I didn't get the battery percentage on the status bar but all other issues are OK and status indicated version number 4.55.97, I repeated flash from recovery but after wiping and remounting all folders, this time for stock 4.55.97
Now I'm on stock 4.55.97 with battery percent on status bar and syncing from my mac.
thanks CEnnis91
NA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm about to try this.. but it's making me think... Do you think the updater-script doesn't correctly format system? Think about it... our devices say 4.55.97 (mine changed to that after a reboot or two), and we only had partial features... sounds like something isn't wiping correctly.

Kernel/bootloader/recovery

Hi guys,
1. What is the advantage/disadvantage of flashing a custom kernel?
2. I recently flashed Cyanogenmod. It automatically installs a custom kernel right?
3. Using the Nexus 7 toolkit I reverted my N7 to stock recovery (from CWM) How should I make sure that it's been reverted to the latest stock version?
4. What does N7's stock factory image contain? (Stock ROM + Stock recovery + Stock kernel?) (found here: https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images)
5. Is this correct? You can install a custom ROM without changing the kernel but in order to have more customization you have to flash a different kernel than the stock one.
6. Is this the correct order? Unlocking bootloader>rooting>Flashing custom recovery>Flashing custom kernel>Flashing custom ROM>...?
7. Difference between unlocking bootloader and rooting.
8. How to find out N7's latest stock kernel version.
Many thanx
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
valapsp said:
1. What is the advantage/disadvantage of flashing a custom kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same as those for a stock kernel. That is to say, every kernel has advantages and disadvantages. Some trade performance for battery life, others do the reverse. Some are more feature-heavy and potentially more unstable, others are feature-light but designed to be rock solid. With custom kernels on a Nexus device, you avoid one of the biggest dangers of custom kernels (instability due to lack of kernel source for developers to base their work on), but you still need to be careful. You don't necessarily know how proficient the author of a given kernel is, and the wrong one can make your device unusable/kill it.
valapsp said:
2. I recently flashed Cyanogenmod. It automatically installs a custom kernel right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe it does. I don't remember which one though, since I don't use CM.
valapsp said:
3. Using the Nexus 7 toolkit I reverted my N7 to stock recovery (from CWM) How should I make sure that it's been reverted to the latest stock version?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to be more specific-- the latest stock ROM, or the latest stock recovery? If you're wondering about the ROM, you can check in Settings > About tablet > Status. When it comes to determining recovery version, I'm not so sure.
valapsp said:
4. What does N7's stock factory image contain? (Stock ROM + Stock recovery + Stock kernel?) (found here: https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe it contains stock ROM and kernel.
valapsp said:
5. Is this correct? You can install a custom ROM without changing the kernel but in order to have more customization you have to flash a different kernel than the stock one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Generally correct. There's a subset of features that are kernel-dependent, not ROM dependent, so you should think of it as ROM customizations vs. kernel customizations. Some examples of the former include PIE menus and Paranoid Android's Halo feature. Examples of the latter might include tap2wake (double tap on a powered-off screen to turn it on), NTFS drive support for OTG, and so on.
valapsp said:
6. Is this the correct order? Unlocking bootloader>rooting>Flashing custom recovery>Flashing custom kernel>Flashing custom ROM>...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and no? It's one way of going about it, save for the last two things, which should be reversed. Since some ROMs include custom kernels, flashing a kernel and then a ROM runs the risk of having your kernel choice overwritten.
If all you need to do is flash a different ROM, you can go straight form unlocking the bootloader to flashing a recovery. You can also flash ROMs and kernels independently, so long as whatever kernel/ROM you're running initially doesn't have known incompatibilities with your new ROM/kernel.
valapsp said:
7. Difference between unlocking bootloader and rooting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unlocking your bootloader is like getting the key to a house. Rooting is getting permission from the landlord to do whatever the heck you want to the house. A locked bootloader means that the device is checking to ensure no unauthorized code is running at boot time, which prevents custom recoveries from being installed. Rooting only really matters when the device is booted up.
valapsp said:
8. How to find out N7's latest stock kernel version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Google. Sorry, can't help you with this one.
That was a great answer @Rirere
Rirere said:
Same as those for a stock kernel. That is to say, every kernel has advantages and disadvantages. Some trade performance for battery life, others do the reverse. Some are more feature-heavy and potentially more unstable, others are feature-light but designed to be rock solid. With custom kernels on a Nexus device, you avoid one of the biggest dangers of custom kernels (instability due to lack of kernel source for developers to base their work on), but you still need to be careful. You don't necessarily know how proficient the author of a given kernel is, and the wrong one can make your device unusable/kill it.
I believe it does. I don't remember which one though, since I don't use CM.
You need to be more specific-- the latest stock ROM, or the latest stock recovery? If you're wondering about the ROM, you can check in Settings > About tablet > Status. When it comes to determining recovery version, I'm not so sure.
I believe it contains stock ROM and kernel.
Generally correct. There's a subset of features that are kernel-dependent, not ROM dependent, so you should think of it as ROM customizations vs. kernel customizations. Some examples of the former include PIE menus and Paranoid Android's Halo feature. Examples of the latter might include tap2wake (double tap on a powered-off screen to turn it on), NTFS drive support for OTG, and so on.
Yes and no? It's one way of going about it, save for the last two things, which should be reversed. Since some ROMs include custom kernels, flashing a kernel and then a ROM runs the risk of having your kernel choice overwritten.
If all you need to do is flash a different ROM, you can go straight form unlocking the bootloader to flashing a recovery. You can also flash ROMs and kernels independently, so long as whatever kernel/ROM you're running initially doesn't have known incompatibilities with your new ROM/kernel.
Unlocking your bootloader is like getting the key to a house. Rooting is getting permission from the landlord to do whatever the heck you want to the house. A locked bootloader means that the device is checking to ensure no unauthorized code is running at boot time, which prevents custom recoveries from being installed. Rooting only really matters when the device is booted up.
Google. Sorry, can't help you with this one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all many many thanx to you because of your help. Yes I meant stock RECOVERY in question 3 also the way you explained question #7 is awesome.
Now I'm running stock ROM on CWM recovery and Franco kernel. My question is that will I be able to upgrade to Android 4.3 with this recovery and kernel? Or I have to flash the stock kernel or stock recovery or both?
Also how can I extract the stock kernel from the factory stock image file?
Thanx again.
valapsp said:
First of all many many thanx to you because of your help. Yes I meant stock RECOVERY in question 3 also the way you explained question #7 is awesome.
Now I'm running stock ROM on CWM recovery and Franco kernel. My question is that will I be able to upgrade to Android 4.3 with this recovery and kernel? Or I have to flash the stock kernel or stock recovery or both?
Also how can I extract the stock kernel from the factory stock image file?
Thanx again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OTA updates are normally only applied to the rom/system, so in theory you should be able to just run the OTA update with the stock rom, the worst that would mainly happen is losing rooting because the system partition gets replaced with a fresh install of the newest operating system (but your /data retains your settings and user data).
I use TWRP recovery instead of CWM, and TWRP when you're bout to exit it will detect if your system has Supersu or not and will offer to install it for you (from there once you boot into the system you can use it to install the su binary for you thus re-rooting).
In the end it's a personal choice. With custom roms like I'm using, there's no real "OTA" update (just a notice that the rom creators use to notify you of new versions which are downloaded to the device, and you just reboot into recovery to flash them). Custom roms typically get updated a few days to a few weeks after google updates if they're AOSP based.
The stock kernel would normally be the boot image, I don't know how you would do it with clockwork mod, but in TWRP you can simply make a backup of the boot partition to retain the original stock kernel. (It will of course only work on AOSP-based roms if you choose to just flash the stock kernel, but the ones that are made for the rom, or custom kernels tend to offer optimizations over the original stock one).
Thanks, I meant extracting the stock kernel from factory image file found here:
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images
By the way I don't have the stock kernel anymore to back it up.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
valapsp said:
Thanks, I meant extracting the stock kernel from factory image file found here:
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images
By the way I don't have the stock kernel anymore to back it up.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh I see, well if your's is the Wifi-only version then would be something like this https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images#nakasijdq39
The firmwares are basically gzipped tarballs (in a linux system tar zxvf would normally unpack em, otherwise 7zip for windows does a good job of unpacking it into a folder).
Alternatively you can just download the kernel itself (Post #3) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2151154
Edit: Yes if you un-gzip/untar the original firmware, then unpack image-nakasi-jdq39.zip inside of that, there will be a boot.img that's where the kernel lives. The boot.img can be flashed via fastboot to the boot partition (I'd advise reading up on this first before actually doing it). Though like linked above, there are some recovery-flashible versions of the stock kernel you can use instead.
kbeezie said:
Ahh I see, well if your's is the Wifi-only version then would be something like this https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/images#nakasijdq39
The firmwares are basically gzipped tarballs (in a linux system tar zxvf would normally unpack em, otherwise 7zip for windows does a good job of unpacking it into a folder).
Alternatively you can just download the kernel itself (Post #3) http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2151154
Edit: Yes if you un-gzip/untar the original firmware, then unpack image-nakasi-jdq39.zip inside of that, there will be a boot.img that's where the kernel lives. The boot.img can be flashed via fastboot to the boot partition (I'd advise reading up on this first before actually doing it). Though like linked above, there are some recovery-flashible versions of the stock kernel you can use instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks, I actually did unzip the stock firmware seconds ago and was posting the results then I saw your edit.
Just there are some confusions here: what is that userdata.img? also what is bootloader-grouper-4.18.img
valapsp said:
thanks, I actually did unzip the stock firmware seconds ago and was posting the results then I saw your edit.
Just there are some confusions here: what is that userdata.img? also what is bootloader-grouper-4.18.img
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bootloader img would be the original stock bootloader for the Nexus 7, chances are you never replaced it, you only unlocked it. There's usually no reason to replace the bootloader with a custom one since all you need to do is unlock it.
userdata.img would be the /data partition. The firmware download basically has a image for all of the partition in the original out-of-the-box stock state. Technically you don't even to flash it, as long as you wiped /data before rebooting (since that would be the same as a clean install if you instead flashed the system and boot partition).
Edit: If I were messing with it to get back stock rom (but not messing with recovery, cuz custom recovery is still handy to have), I would only flash the boot.img and system.img , then log into Recovery and wipe data (ie: factory reset which wipes cache and /data but doesn't touch /data/media), Then I would be able to reboot into a clean stock install of the rom.
(from there I could just make a backup from recovery so I wouldn't have to do a fastboot flash again).
kbeezie said:
The OTA updates are normally only applied to the rom/system, so in theory you should be able to just run the OTA update with the stock rom, the worst that would mainly happen is losing rooting because the system partition gets replaced with a fresh install of the newest operating system (but your /data retains your settings and user data).
I use TWRP recovery instead of CWM, and TWRP when you're bout to exit it will detect if your system has Supersu or not and will offer to install it for you (from there once you boot into the system you can use it to install the su binary for you thus re-rooting).
In the end it's a personal choice. With custom roms like I'm using, there's no real "OTA" update (just a notice that the rom creators use to notify you of new versions which are downloaded to the device, and you just reboot into recovery to flash them). Custom roms typically get updated a few days to a few weeks after google updates if they're AOSP based.
The stock kernel would normally be the boot image, I don't know how you would do it with clockwork mod, but in TWRP you can simply make a backup of the boot partition to retain the original stock kernel. (It will of course only work on AOSP-based roms if you choose to just flash the stock kernel, but the ones that are made for the rom, or custom kernels tend to offer optimizations over the original stock one).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, how many times does should matter? Theoretically, you should be able to do OTAs while rooted by downloading the ZIP and flashing in recovery, but if you've made changes to /system (uninstalling a system app, or adding a helper), you might get the stupid script_assert error. Of course, you could just push the whole /system back to your device...although that can be just as annoying.
I wish there were away to turn off the script_asserts safely, but they do exist for a reason.
@valapsp
Small but important clarification.
valapsp said:
5. Is this correct? You can install a custom ROM without changing the kernel but in order to have more customization you have to flash a different kernel than the stock one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Essentially 100% of custom ROMs install a kernel. (Actually, a kernel plus a ramdisk packaged together as a single ("bootable image") file, typically named "boot.img".) So your preexisting boot image containing the kernel is always overwritten during a ROM installation. See next answer.
valapsp said:
6. Is this the correct order? Unlocking bootloader>rooting>Flashing custom recovery>Flashing custom kernel>Flashing custom ROM>...?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost, but not quite. If you want to use a different kernel than what ships with a given ROM, you flash it after you have installed the ROM, not beforehand. See prior answer.
One more thing. Since you are new to this stuff, I'll make a suggestion:
Learn how to create and restore full Nandroid backups (using the custom recovery) immediately. And get in the habit of copying them off your tablet to your PC. You will thank me later for this advice.
have fun
Rirere said:
Unfortunately, how many times does should matter? Theoretically, you should be able to do OTAs while rooted by downloading the ZIP and flashing in recovery, but if you've made changes to /system (uninstalling a system app, or adding a helper), you might get the stupid script_assert error. Of course, you could just push the whole /system back to your device...although that can be just as annoying.
I wish there were away to turn off the script_asserts safely, but they do exist for a reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, Rirere...
This is my understanding as well... (sort of! - I've always been a bit hazy on this topic).
My take on it is this...
The OTA would only fail, if it found files in /system that SHOULD BE THERE, but have been removed, modified, or replaced by the user (or via some app run by the user).
Logically (one would think), the OTA can't check for files THAT SHOULDN'T BE THERE (How would it know what to look for?) but have been ADDED by the user... like the su binary that confers root.
So, an OTA on pure ROOTED (but in all other regards, unadulterated) stock you would expect to succeed... you'd just lose root (and from what I've read elsewhere, your Custom Recovery). Both of which are trivial to recover.
Is my understanding correct... or have I missed something?
Rgrds,
Ged.
GedBlake said:
Hi, Rirere...
This is my understanding as well... (sort of! - I've always been a bit hazy on this topic).
My take on it is this...
The OTA would only fail, if it found files in /system that SHOULD BE THERE, but have been removed, modified, or replaced by the user (or via some app run by the user).
Logically (one would think), the OTA can't check for files THAT SHOULDN'T BE THERE (How would it know what to look for?) but have been ADDED by the user... like the su binary that confers root.
So, an OTA on pure ROOTED (but in all other regards, unadulterated) stock you would expect to succeed... you'd just lose root (and from what I've read elsewhere, your Custom Recovery). Both of which are trivial to recover.
Is my understanding correct... or have I missed something?
Rgrds,
Ged.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe you are correct! Theoretically, the script could rather easily check for added files by checksumming the entire /system partition before running the update (using a fast hash algorithm-- you're only looking for the presence of any changes, afterall). And I did have one OTA that went fine, other than losing root back on my Galaxy Nexus.
Again though, it's a classic case of should versus real life. Some root methods might alter things in /system without your knowing, or root actions might alter permissions. Either way, it's a tricky, nasty little game.
So far as recoveries go: yeah, OTAs have a nasty habit of trying to do that. Some of the more advanced recoveries can resist being overwritten though/slipstream a root ZIP into the update process.
GedBlake said:
The OTA would only fail, if it found files in /system that SHOULD BE THERE, but have been removed, modified, or replaced by the user (or via some app run by the user).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Typically the OTAs also update the boot image, so the boot partition (LNX) is also checked. The stock recoveries almost always use the same kernel (with a different ramdisk) as the boot image, so they are usually rewritten too.
Owners of tilapia N7 devices have reported successful flashing of everything but radio firmware images when they used a custom recovery to process the OTA bundle. Not a disaster, as their devices will still function with old radio firmware, but it puts them in an unusual position of being unable to use the OTA to subsequently update the radio, even if they restore the stock recovery (the system files and boot images will have been changed, so almost all of the checksums will fail). At that point, using fastboot is an alternate option, but then the newbs will need to read about OTA images, unpack them, yadda yadda yadda.
IMO it is just a dumb idea applying OTAs to anything but a pure stock device. And when I say pure stock, I mean including the stock recovery. The boot loader can be left unlocked, but that's about it.
There are a lot of ways to skin the cat, but IMO the best way to proceed is to operate with two parallel but independent tracks of Nandroid backups/restores: one track is a sequence of pure stock, and the other your customized ROM du jour.
Let's presume you have a Nandroid backup of the pure stock ROM. Make a backup of your current (customized) ROM & get it copied off the tablet (in the event of a disaster), restore the pure stock ROM nandroid backup, flash the stock recovery back to the tab, and then take the OTA.
At this point:
[ unlocked bootloader ] soft-boot (no flashing) a custom recovery using fastboot, and then make yet another Nandroid backup of the newly updated stock ROM including the recovery image. (This becomes the new baseline for future OTAs)
[ locked bootloader ] re-root with motochopper, capture the (new) stock recovery partition using 'dd', flash a custom recovery ('dd' or other method), make a Nandroid of this. (These two backups become the new baseline for future OTAs)
Then, repeat any rooting customizations (if you are a "lightly customized rooted stock" kinda person), and restore apps (Market apps only!) with TiBu.
This may seem like a great deal of work, but it is the only way to insure that you can revert to a prior starting position. Look: after going down a road like this you can even restore the old customized ROM backup to make TiBu app backups after the fact, simply because you can return to any point in time if you have made a backup (and kept a copy of it off the tablet).
Everybody makes mistakes - even the experts. But the lazier folks are (read: toolkit user) the more likely is a disaster. Everybody needs to make backups.
What will happen if I change some values in build.prop editor? I won't be able to install stock ROMs anymore? Or what?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
valapsp said:
What will happen if I change some values in build.prop editor? I won't be able to install stock ROMs anymore? Or what?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on how you mean "install", you can always install via .img or recovery flashing method, but course that will overwrite your build.prop with the provided version and you would just have to re-edit the values again.
Did you mean OTA wise? If the update doesn't check for the hash of the build.prop, it will likely just replace it with a newer version if anything has changed from the last version to the new version.
As others have said, worse case scenario, the OTA fails to proceed due to errors and you would just have to manually update it yourself, as you could just flash a new boot.img and system.img from google's site (just have to remember anything you added on top of system or custom kernels will of course be reverted, so they will need to be reapplied).
Settings and user apps and such all live in /data , so it should just simply boot up as an upgraded system but with everything else intact (course I always make a backup via my custom recovery just in case).
kbeezie said:
Depends on how you mean "install", you can always install via .img or recovery flashing method, but course that will overwrite your build.prop with the provided version and you would just have to re-edit the values again.
Did you mean OTA wise? If the update doesn't check for the hash of the build.prop, it will likely just replace it with a newer version if anything has changed from the last version to the new version.
As others have said, worse case scenario, the OTA fails to proceed due to errors and you would just have to manually update it yourself, as you could just flash a new boot.img and system.img from google's site (just have to remember anything you added on top of system or custom kernels will of course be reverted, so they will need to be reapplied).
Settings and user apps and such all live in /data , so it should just simply boot up as an upgraded system but with everything else intact (course I always make a backup via my custom recovery just in case).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, and does backing up thru cwm also back up the build.prop?
valapsp said:
Thanks, and does backing up thru cwm also back up the build.prop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but not in the way you're thinking. If you back up the whole system, CWM will package each partition up (/system /data , etc), so when you flash a new rom or system on, you can't just selectively restore build.prop since restoring in CWM Would also restore the entire system partition.
You can while in recovery, mount /system and do something like
adb pull /system/build.prop , and save a copy of it on your computer, so you can go back in and change the affected values back if for some reason you needed to.
If you're familiar with ghosting, nandroid backups (what CWM and most others do, minus some variations), are basically exact clones of all the files on each partition. Older recoveries actually took an image snapshot, newer ones basically pack all the files in a compressed archive (With some kind of note of what partition type it was, ext4, etc). The latter can easily be unpacked with tar, or 7zip, etc, but disk images are a different matter.
I can't remember which one CWM does exactly since on my DZ I use 4EXT, and on my Nexus devices I use TWRP.
kbeezie said:
Yes, but not in the way you're thinking. If you back up the whole system, CWM will package each partition up (/system /data , etc), so when you flash a new rom or system on, you can't just selectively restore build.prop since restoring in CWM Would also restore the entire system partition.
You can while in recovery, mount /system and do something like
adb pull /system/build.prop , and save a copy of it on your computer, so you can go back in and change the affected values back if for some reason you needed to.
If you're familiar with ghosting, nandroid backups (what CWM and most others do, minus some variations), are basically exact clones of all the files on each partition. Older recoveries actually took an image snapshot, newer ones basically pack all the files in a compressed archive (With some kind of note of what partition type it was, ext4, etc). The latter can easily be unpacked with tar, or 7zip, etc, but disk images are a different matter.
I can't remember which one CWM does exactly since on my DZ I use 4EXT, and on my Nexus devices I use TWRP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, an easier way is to copy the build.prop thru a file manager.
But since I'm on my geek mood today I wanna know if it's possible to extract the backed up (Nandroid) file and find the build.prop somewhere there.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
valapsp said:
Thanks, an easier way is to copy the build.prop thru a file manager.
But since I'm on my geek mood today I wanna know if it's possible to extract the backed up (Nandroid) file and find the build.prop somewhere there.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it's a backup done with 4EXT or TWRP most certainly since it's just a tarball package (or tar+gzipped if you enabled compression) and can be easily unpacked by tar, or any popular archive utility like 7Zip for windows. (restoration generally just looks at the file info to see what partition type it's supposed to be, formats the partition as such, and then just un-tars the content, with the permissions and such retained).
If it's older where it's an actual jaffs (may have spelled that wrong) disk image, I'm not sure off the top of my head how you would mount it as a disk , and then mount the ext4 or ext3 partition in order to get to it. I would assume ClockworkMod would have upgraded their backup method to the same as TWRP or 4EXT, but it's possible that they didn't for compatibility reasons.

New July images posted

Two again - MMB30K & MOB30O. I have no idea what the difference is, but I've used MOB30O successfully.
Link to the Nexus 6 OTA page with instructions for sideloading (no data loss, need to reinstall TWRP & reroot):
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/ota
For those people who prefer to install separate components:
MMB30K
MOB30O
dahawthorne said:
Two again - MMB30K & MOB30O.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did anyone ever figure out what the difference was? Google did this last time, and the result seemed the same between the two.
I went with MOB30M last time and it worked fine, so I'm going with MOB30O.
@dahawthorne added the links on the first post for you..
Thanks. I should have included the links, but I reckoned that anyone who's interested knows where to find them, and anyone who doesn't know probably shouldn't be tinkering...
But yes, the pointer is appreciated.
Edit: I used the OTA at this link - simpler, and doesn't lose your data:
https://developers.google.com/android/nexus/ota#shamu
Instructions are on the page. A simple sideload, flash recovery, install SuperSU.
Sir , is there any difference between MMB30K and MOB30O versions?
marcus droid said:
Sir , is there any difference between MMB30K and MOB30O versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we have to wait for the AOSP change logs on that
Encrytable boot/kernel IMGs:
MOB30O:
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24572369242688110
MMB30K:
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?fid=24572369242688111
What was the difference between the last 2 images? That was released without explanation as well!
I flashed the MOB30O version, anyone having trouble flashing SuperSU like me?
SuperSU flashed alright in TWRP(though the log seems a bit shorter than usual). When I rebooted the system, it says that SuperSU binary is not installed. I've tried to reflash TWRP (since stock recovery takes over) & different versions of SuperSU: 2.74 / 2.76 and can't seem to get root.
Strange. I sideloaded the MOB30O OTA, flashed TWRP (twice - it didn't stick first time) then installed SuperSU 2.76 from TWRP. No problems at all so far.
ayang02 said:
I flashed the MOB30O version, anyone having trouble flashing SuperSU like me?
SuperSU flashed alright in TWRP(though the log seems a bit shorter than usual). When I rebooted the system, it says that SuperSU binary is not installed. I've tried to reflash TWRP (since stock recovery takes over) & different versions of SuperSU: 2.74 / 2.76 and can't seem to get root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I flashed SuperSU 2.76 just fine after flashing the MOB30O image. Also, I've never had stock recovery get replaced on my Nexus 6 ever. That's really strange.
The difference between these two images has been posted many times - not sure why people are confused about it!
MOB is the version you want.
MMB is the version for the Carriers who haven't approved the newer radio in MOB.
MOB also includes some kernel enhancements to increase performance. These changes related to the Kernel "Tick Rate". I think the changes have improved performance a little, but you're not going to think you've purchased a new phone or anything.
Summary:
MOB: Newer kernel with performance improvements, updated Radio image.
MMB: Older kernel sans performance improvements, old radio.
Summary: MOB is the train you want to be on.
ayang02 said:
I flashed the MOB30O version, anyone having trouble flashing SuperSU like me?
SuperSU flashed alright in TWRP(though the log seems a bit shorter than usual). When I rebooted the system, it says that SuperSU binary is not installed. I've tried to reflash TWRP (since stock recovery takes over) & different versions of SuperSU: 2.74 / 2.76 and can't seem to get root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dl'd the O image, extracted and flashed the system image only through twrp while at work. Rooted using a PC when I got home and I have no issues so fah. I use chainfires method and his method requires running his image with fast boot. Fastboot boot cf... What ever you have the file named. It'll do it's thing on the phone then reboot 1-3x before it boots up fully. This root it rebooted once. On previous updates, up to 3 times before it finally finished.
Why are people insisting on flashing the "old" modular way (extracting components for individual flashing) when Google have provided a total no-data-loss OTA? 15 minutes, risk-free. Why choose the difficult way when there's a seamless simple upgrade? Incomprehensible.
dahawthorne said:
Why are people insisting on flashing the "old" modular way (extracting components for individual flashing) when Google have provided a total no-data-loss OTA? 15 minutes, risk-free. Why choose the difficult way when there's a seamless simple upgrade? Incomprehensible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me it's because I've lost my data a couple of times in the past doing an OTA update. I guess old habits die hard and I like the control I have flashing each image file manually. At least that way I can be reasonably sure that my data isn't messed with by not flashing the userdata image, plus, I can skip flashing recovery so I don't have to reinstall that. It only took me 9 minutes to complete the process tonight, including re-rooting, doing it the "old" way.
dahawthorne said:
Why are people insisting on flashing the "old" modular way (extracting components for individual flashing) when Google have provided a total no-data-loss OTA? 15 minutes, risk-free. Why choose the difficult way when there's a seamless simple upgrade? Incomprehensible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two very simple reasons. 1) if you are rooted. 2) if you are unencrypted.
FWIW: it takes about 60 seconds to extract the images from the .zip file. And about 3 minutes to flash the boot and system image files in fastboot.
before i download the entire package can anyone tell me if there is a new modem in july update?
H4X0R46 said:
I flashed SuperSU 2.76 just fine after flashing the MOB30O image. Also, I've never had stock recovery get replaced on my Nexus 6 ever. That's really strange.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then that means you were able to get root successfully. My TWRP recovery got overwritten because I didn't get root. Anyways, I am gonna try flashing stuff from scratch in a few days. I've also never had issues flashing monthly updates and SuperSU until now.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Free mobile app
adm1jtg said:
before i download the entire package can anyone tell me if there is a new modem in july update?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no new modem, nor bootloader. Just security updates to boot and system images.

Fixed 6P bootlooping, now i want to update to Oreo

Hi all, I posted this in the 6P bootloop thread, but didn't get a response. As that is a pretty LONG thread, i'm thinking my question may have gotten lost in the jumble.
Quick run down.
A few months back my 6P started the BLOD. I found the fix listed on these pages, applied it, and have been happily using my phone ever since. Phone is bone stock 7.1.2 other than the TWRP recovery and the modified EX kernel for 4 cores.
Since the fix, my phone FINALLY got the OTA update to go to Android 8.0 and i obviously want to get it done. My concern is HOW to do this without causing more headache.
Can anyone point me in the right direction? Should i use the OTA update or download the factory image from Google?
I've got some knowledge as i used to be into the "rooting" scene back in the day, but haven't for a while, so i feel a little lost.
Thanks for any help.
johnnyphive said:
Hi all, I posted this in the 6P bootloop thread, but didn't get a response. As that is a pretty LONG thread, i'm thinking my question may have gotten lost in the jumble.
Quick run down.
A few months back my 6P started the BLOD. I found the fix listed on these pages, applied it, and have been happily using my phone ever since. Phone is bone stock 7.1.2 other than the TWRP recovery and the modified EX kernel for 4 cores.
Since the fix, my phone FINALLY got the OTA update to go to Android 8.0 and i obviously want to get it done. My concern is HOW to do this without causing more headache.
Can anyone point me in the right direction? Should i use the OTA update or download the factory image from Google?
I've got some knowledge as i used to be into the "rooting" scene back in the day, but haven't for a while, so i feel a little lost.
Thanks for any help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, for starters do NOT take the OTA. It will either fail or boot loop your phone. Due to the fact you have a modified boot.img you will need to update manually using fastboot with the full image. Re-apply the modified kernel after you finish updating the partitions, but BEFORE booting the first time. You can follow most guides on how to manually update a full image using fastboot, just add the step of flashing the modified kernel before booting.
Thanks for the reply and the help. If i could ask for a little more help, as this is my only phone.
Can you explain the difference between the modified boot.img and the modified kernel?
If i download the factory image from here (https://developers.google.com/android/images) is it ok to the get the latested one (Nov 2017) or do i need to get the original one (Sep 2017 as i'm on Fi)
Once i flash the factory image, is it going to replace the modified boot image as well as the modified kernel?
Follow the OP on this thread (https://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6p/general/guide-fix-nexus-6p-bootloop-death-blod-t3640279) in the downloads section there appear to be 2 files i would need, the "Boot.img from stock 6.17, 8.0 firmware" and "EX kernel version 5.03". Am i understanding that correctly?
Like i said, this is my only phone, and i'm probably just being overly paranoid about bricking it, but any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
johnnyphive said:
Thanks for the reply and the help. If i could ask for a little more help, as this is my only phone.
Can you explain the difference between the modified boot.img and the modified kernel?
If i download the factory image from here (https://developers.google.com/android/images) is it ok to the get the latested one (Nov 2017) or do i need to get the original one (Sep 2017 as i'm on Fi)
Once i flash the factory image, is it going to replace the modified boot image as well as the modified kernel?
Follow the OP on this thread (https://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6p/general/guide-fix-nexus-6p-bootloop-death-blod-t3640279) in the downloads section there appear to be 2 files i would need, the "Boot.img from stock 6.17, 8.0 firmware" and "EX kernel version 5.03". Am i understanding that correctly?
Like i said, this is my only phone, and i'm probably just being overly paranoid about bricking it, but any clarification would be greatly appreciated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the latest November image. The boot.img contains the kernel and ramdisk, critical files necessary to load the device before the filesystem can be mounted. When you flash the new boot.img contained in the Google image, it will overwrite the patched kernel. You then need to re-patch it by installing EX kernel before booting. EX writes to (modifies) the stock boot.img. There are also pre-modifed boot.img files floating around. You will probably get more detailed help in the dedicated thread. Learning to flash manually (or remember how) is not really a big deal and a necessary skill for modding (and for getting yourself out of trouble). Good luck. :good:
v12xke said:
Use the latest November image. The boot.img contains the kernel and ramdisk, critical files necessary to load the device before the filesystem can be mounted. When you flash the new boot.img contained in the Google image, it will overwrite the patched kernel. You then need to re-patch it by installing EX kernel before booting. EX writes to (modifies) the stock boot.img. There are also pre-modifed boot.img files floating around. You will probably get more detailed help in the dedicated thread. Learning to flash manually (or remember how) is not really a big deal and a necessary skill for modding (and for getting yourself out of trouble). Good luck. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, so 1 last time (sorry)
1 - Downloaded the latest 8.0.0 factory image from google (this contains the bootloader, radio, and partitions (.zip).
2 - Get phone to fastboot and apply the above 3 new images
3- before rebooting, flash oreo4core (new, modified boot.img), TWRP recovery.img
4- reboot to recovery (TWRP) and apply the modified EX kernel
5 - reboot and (hopefully) profit
Am i missing anything, or doing anything that isn't needed?
johnnyphive said:
Ok, so 1 last time (sorry)
1 - Downloaded the latest 8.0.0 factory image from google (this contains the bootloader, radio, and partitions (.zip).
2 - Get phone to fastboot and apply the above 3 new images
3- before rebooting, flash oreo4core (new, modified boot.img), TWRP recovery.img
4- reboot to recovery (TWRP) and apply the modified EX kernel
5 - reboot and (hopefully) profit
Am i missing anything, or doing anything that isn't needed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
<<Disclaimer: I don't use the 4 core kernel, so I don't know if it comes with installer script or someone has just modified the latest boot.img>> Unzip the "partitions" zip you refer to and extract those image files to the same folder as bootloader and modem. For example, you can keep TWRP recovery if you don't flash the recovery.img. That is how you preserve your custom recovery. So in other words you'll now have a folder (your ADB folder?) with 5 image files.... bootloader, radio, boot, system, and vendor all in one folder. <<Note: it is my understanding you just substitute the latest oreo4core file (should be boot.img?) If this is true, copy that file into your ADB folder and let it overwrite the stock boot.img. Stop. Copy over flash-all.bat, change the *.bat extension to *.txt and open in notepad. You will see (and can copy/paste) the fastboot commands to get you started with bootloader and radio. Then flash the last 3 (boot, system, vendor). At this point you can reboot into the OS. Since you substituted the oreo4core boot.img file for the stock boot.img there is no need to use TWRP to flash anything. That and since you skipped flashing the recovery.img, TWRP is still there.
v12xke said:
<<Disclaimer: I don't use the 4 core kernel, so I don't know if it comes with installer script or someone has just modified the latest boot.img>> Unzip the "partitions" zip you refer to and extract those image files to the same folder as bootloader and modem. For example, you can keep TWRP recovery if you don't flash the recovery.img. That is how you preserve your custom recovery. So in other words you'll now have a folder (your ADB folder?) with 5 image files.... bootloader, radio, boot, system, and vendor all in one folder. <<Note: it is my understanding you just substitute the latest oreo4core file (should be boot.img?) If this is true, copy that file into your ADB folder and let it overwrite the stock boot.img. Stop. Copy over flash-all.bat, change the *.bat extension to *.txt and open in notepad. You will see (and can copy/paste) the fastboot commands to get you started with bootloader and radio. Then flash the last 3 (boot, system, vendor). At this point you can reboot into the OS. Since you substituted the oreo4core boot.img file for the stock boot.img there is no need to use TWRP to flash anything. That and since you skipped flashing the recovery.img, TWRP is still there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank for the help! Everything seems to be up and running. I know you said you don't use the "4 cores" (can only assume your either on a different phone or yours isn't affected by the BLOD), but do you know if i still need to apply the EX kernel update, or know of a way to tell if it's already been applied?
Thanks again for all the help. I was pretty much in the right direction, but being as how i'd been away from it for a while, i wanted some backup
johnnyphive said:
Thank for the help! Everything seems to be up and running. I know you said you don't use the "4 cores" (can only assume your either on a different phone or yours isn't affected by the BLOD), but do you know if i still need to apply the EX kernel update, or know of a way to tell if it's already been applied? Thanks again for all the help. I was pretty much in the right direction, but being as how i'd been away from it for a while, i wanted some backup
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you can flash EX kernel from now on. I think you have to use a modded boot.img that will contain his kernel/ramdisk. This is my guess. You really should be getting your information in the dedicated thread where everyone is actually installing and using it. Google "oreo 4 core" and you will find the XDA thread is the first hit. Good luck. :good:

Categories

Resources