So guys! My patience is gone now to see cm12.1! I don't care about fingerprint and Laser auto focus (Kidding I care) but whatever! I'm thinking to flash Cm12.1 with boeffela kernel! So will it work flawlessly?? Has anyone tried cm12.1 is it good?? Should I flash?
chetan_1215 said:
So guys! My patience is gone now to see cm12.1! I don't care about fingerprint and Laser auto focus (Kidding I care) but whatever! I'm thinking to flash Cm12.1 with boeffela kernel! So will it work flawlessly?? Has anyone tried cm12.1 is it good?? Should I flash?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I switched to CM 12.1 my first thought was also about flashing Boeffla kernel.
But I decided to try native CM kernel for a few days and surprisingly I was not disappointed
Nice, fast kernel, battery friendly.
So there is no need for me to flash Boeffla on CM 12.1
Boeffla kernel is not compatible with CM and he won't make a Kernel for CM until there is an official CM rom
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
spencer24 said:
Boeffla kernel is not compatible with CM and he won't make a Kernel for CM until there is an official CM rom
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info! can you tell me will AK kernel work in cm12.1?
Hi Chetan, just wondering which version of CM you are using, and how you find it (in particular photo quality). I'm very tempted to flash it myself, but have just started using Boeffla Kernel with OOS, so wish to give that a bit of a go...
Sent from my ONE A2001 using Tapatalk
jemcik said:
When I switched to CM 12.1 my first thought was also about flashing Boeffla kernel.
But I decided to try native CM kernel for a few days and surprisingly I was not disappointed
Nice, fast kernel, battery friendly.
So there is no need for me to flash Boeffla on CM 12.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woooo!!! But how you tweak your cpu?? Also can you help me to tweak my cm12.1 settings? Obviously for good battery (I haven't flashed yet just downloaded the roms)
Epipsychidion said:
Hi Chetan, just wondering which version of CM you are using, and how you find it (in particular photo quality). I'm very tempted to flash it myself, but have just started using Boeffla Kernel with OOS, so wish to give that a bit of a go...
Sent from my ONE A2001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hehe I haven't flashed it yet! I'm about to! Just little bit scared... I'll do soon! And surely I will tell you how's it! And Cm12.1 https:// forums.oneplus.net/threads/unofficial-cm12-1-cyanogenmod-12-1-beta-for-oneplus-2.351889/ (remove the space)
chetan_1215 said:
Thanks for the info! can you tell me will AK kernel work in cm12.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure there was a version which will work but as I'm not a user of AK I not sure which one it is
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
spencer24 said:
I'm sure there was a version which will work but as I'm not a user of AK I not sure which one it is
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem bro! Can you tell me which Custom rom and Kernel you using in your OP2?? :silly:
Since development of AK has ceased, don't expect the last version of AK to work with "never" builds of CM12.1 though.
chetan_1215 said:
But how you tweak your cpu??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you think you need to tweak it?
It works great out of the box
I just edited system/etc/thermal-engine.conf to reduce thermal throttling in Real Racing 3
chetan_1215 said:
No problem bro! Can you tell me which Custom rom and Kernel you using in your OP2?? :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using stock oos 2.2 With the latest Boeffla does just what I need. I would like to try out cm but will wait till they fix all the problems on cm 13
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
jemcik said:
Why do you think you need to tweak it?
It works great out of the box
I just edited system/etc/thermal-engine.conf to reduce thermal throttling in Real Racing 3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hehe i just need good battery life! and little good performance
spencer24 said:
I'm using stock oos 2.2 With the latest Boeffla does just what I need. I would like to try out cm but will wait till they fix all the problems on cm 13
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!! and surely i'll wait!
Related
Hey guys,
Is there any way to have dt2w on any ROM or KERNEL? Some kind of zip maybe?
Thanks [emoji6]
theraf90 said:
Hey guys,
Is there any way to have dt2w on any ROM or KERNEL? Some kind of zip maybe?
Thanks [emoji6]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only way of using DT2W is to flash a custom kernel or roms, so unless there is some other cheaty way of doing it, I can't help you.
DylonSaaied said:
The only way of using DT2W is to flash a custom kernel or roms, so unless there is some other cheaty way of doing it, I can't help you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that's what I know too, but you never know someone more talented than me might have figured out the cheaty way [emoji23] [emoji23]
theraf90 said:
Yeah that's what I know too, but you never know someone more talented than me might have figured out the cheaty way [emoji23] [emoji23]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't you just flash a custom kernel tho? I'ts pretty easy. I am running Android 5.0.1 with Sabermod franco.Kernel and Xposed, works perfectly. This kernel has DT2W so yeah .
DylonSaaied said:
Can't you just flash a custom kernel tho? I'ts pretty easy. I am running Android 5.0.1 with Sabermod franco.Kernel and Xposed, works perfectly. This kernel has DT2W so yeah .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed Frank with 5.1 so I wanted to only add dt2w functionality. [emoji23] And find a way not to have to change kernels because I feel that that ROMs usually give their best with their original kernel [emoji6]
It's maybe just a placebo effect
It's simple!
I have installed cm12.1 and I don't know if the temasek cm12.1 are better
Thanks
(My first post)
xxgomesxx said:
It's simple!
I have installed cm12.1 and I don't know if the temasek cm12.1 are better
Thanks
(My first post)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Temasek adds more features fixes bugs really fast. It's better.
xxgomesxx said:
It's simple!
I have installed cm12.1 and I don't know if the temasek cm12.1 are better
Thanks
(My first post)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I installed Temasek 12.8 and 14.1 and wasn't very pleased with them comparing to cm12.1 nightlies. Yesterday I installed Temasek 14.8 and it has been a very good rom indeed. Long battery life and a stable performance. Only bug found so far is same one I had with cm12.1 nightlies; stock browser crashes occasionally when browsing xda forum. I was a bit sceptical with Temasek rom, but the last rom I tried, has completely changed my opinion. Make a backup of your current rom, and install a Temasek one. If not pleased, you can always change back to what you're using atm.
ikkibo said:
I installed Temasek 12.8 and 14.1 and wasn't very pleased with them comparing to cm12.1 nightlies. Yesterday I installed Temasek 14.8 and it has been a very good rom indeed. Long battery life and a stable performance. Only bug found so far is same one I had with cm12.1 nightlies; stock browser crashes occasionally when browsing xda forum. I was a bit sceptical with Temasek rom, but the last rom I tried, has completely changed my opinion. Make a backup of your current rom, and install a Temasek one. If not pleased, you can always change back to what you're using atm.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sceptical really? Please don't say anything you don't prove.
And who the **** use stock browser.
I've tried the CM version and have always come back to Tema's ROM. I seem to miss many of the issues others have had, maybe because I'm an old bugger and don't use a lot of 'them new-fangled gew-gaws' they get into. The above post is correct that Tema is responsive and fixes things fast.
I haven't tested for a while (I froze Antutu because it kept showing up in BBS) but twice I have posted scroes above 49,000 using Tema's ROM - don't even get close with other ones.
I use CM Browser (stands for Cheetah Mobile) - it's very quick - can't recall ever using the stock except mayberight at the start of owning my Note. By the time I flashed a CM ROM I was off that kind of thing so never tried the CM version.
kenny1991 said:
Sceptical really? Please don't say anything you don't prove.
And who the **** use stock browser.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both Temasek roms I tried ate my battery pretty fast, so I thought maybe I had a wrong modem or something preventing Temasek working properly on my phone. (Some had outstanding batterylives with those versions and some didn't, modems were suspected for that, read the forum if you need proof)
And I the **** use stock browser, have 7 different browsers I use daily and the stock one is one of them. So if it crashes, being part of the operating system, maybe not so huge a sin to report about it?
Really? A browser discussion??
Guys, please! Don't fight at my threads gahah?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
xxgomesxx said:
Really? A browser discussion??
Guys, please! Don't fight at my threads gahah?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fight?
Your thread should have not been made because what you ask for is all over the xda and Google. ?
kenny1991 said:
Fight?
Your thread should have not been made because what you ask for is all over the xda and Google. ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you think like that, why you have answered me, or entered in this thread?
gahah
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
xxgomesxx said:
If you think like that, why you have answered me, or entered in this thread?
gahah
Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
?omg
kenny1991 said:
?omg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We will be friends in a near future [emoji23]
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
xxgomesxx said:
We will be friends in a near future [emoji23]
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We all are friends here at xda even when we are tough.
I just bought this phone and I'm really happy with it. But in my opinion, what this phone really needs is a very stock, AOSP based 6.0.1 ROM. Look at ZyxxOS for the Xperia Z3 if you want to know what exactly I'm talking about. If anybody has the time do do this, it would be very much appreciated!
TunerCP said:
I just bought this phone and I'm really happy with it. But in my opinion, what this phone really needs is a very stock, AOSP based 6.0.1 ROM. Look at ZyxxOS for the Xperia Z3 if you want to know what exactly I'm talking about. If anybody has the time do do this, it would be very much appreciated!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't simple to just port stock aosp to a device like the opt. Go check out Exodus it is a aosp based ROM and is fantastic.
Sent from my ONE A2001 using Tapatalk
Oos is very close to aosp, bad performance but flash boeffla it makes the difference
Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk
What about NXROM? nxrom.us/oneplus2.html
DiscipleOfDante said:
What about NXROM? nxrom.us/oneplus2.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cyanogenmod based
skeamznz said:
It isn't simple to just port stock aosp to a device like the opt. Go check out Exodus it is a aosp based ROM and is fantastic.
Sent from my ONE A2001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Exodus is great
Didn't exodus switch to a CM base? http://forum.xda-developers.com/exodus-rom/general/welcome-to-exodus-t3266180
DiscipleOfDante said:
Didn't exodus switch to a CM base? http://forum.xda-developers.com/exodus-rom/general/welcome-to-exodus-t3266180
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup
But for 6 they are going back right?
DiscipleOfDante said:
But for 6 they are going back right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, they are AOSP based.
Sent from my ONE A2003 using Tapatalk
Hi, I'm seriously considering buying this phone. My thinking is to install it CM or RR. How could Xposed behave with those? Any difference between them?
Also, does Viper4Android work? Or boeffla kernel + RR?
Thanks in advance.
RR has way more options and you won't really need xposed (adblocking and youtube adway are great for xposed)
So can I use those with RR? What about Viper?
Thanks!
Viper is reported working on OOS and cm based Roms, boeffla will have a cm kernel
Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk
I think I can't use boeffla with RR or CM, it says so on the boeffla thread
Thanks for the info guys!
Not now, but it will have a cm kernel once official cm is announced, there's a closed beta boeffla kernel for cm13
Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk
When will official CM announced? Is it in progress??
eXtremeDevil said:
Hi, I'm seriously considering buying this phone. My thinking is to install it CM or RR. How could Xposed behave with those? Any difference between them?
Also, does Viper4Android work? Or boeffla kernel + RR?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
RR doesn't support Xposed. CM is always a better option.
---------- Post added at 12:15 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:14 AM ----------
eXtremeDevil said:
When will official CM announced? Is it in progress??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When Oneplus releases the kernel source of MM, CM will become official. Grarak is waiting a long time for it.
And that release is supposed to happen anytime soon or is it just a hope?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
eXtremeDevil said:
And that release is supposed to happen anytime soon or is it just a hope?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It will happen maybe a week later after official MM is released. I think that for next month we'll have the sources.
Sent from my ONE A2005 using Tapatalk
OK, thanks for the info.
Xposed is good & stable enough for me to stay with OOS 3 beta.When Oneplus launches official build I will dirty flash and see what happens.
Thanks, I'll do my tests and see what happens. I just wanted to know some stuff before buying.
Hello,
After installing Extreme Syndicate rom to my Verizon LG V20 with Werewolf kernel, I no longer have the quick charge capabilities. I rooted with Dirty Santa. Everything else seems to be working fine except quick charge. Is there anyone out there familiar with this rom that knows what the issue is and how it can be fixed? Thanks.
prahsper said:
Hello,
After installing Extreme Syndicate rom to my Verizon LG V20 with Werewolf kernel, I no longer have the quick charge capabilities. I rooted with Dirty Santa. Everything else seems to be working fine except quick charge. Is there anyone out there familiar with this rom that knows what the issue is and how it can be fixed? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're using a rom and kernel which are both no longer supported or being developed, there's your problem
Sent from my LG-H910 using XDA Labs
cnjax said:
You're using a rom and kernel which are both no longer supported or being developed, there's your problem
Sent from my LG-H910 using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda figured that...thanks. Would you happen to know of any great up to date stable roms and kernels that offer great battery life as well as performance? Thanks.
prahsper said:
Kinda figured that...thanks. Would you happen to know of any great up to date stable roms and kernels that offer great battery life as well as performance? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try resurrectionremix with gamma kernel.
Or stock based rom like super or alpha rom with mk2000 kernel
tech_infinity said:
Try resurrectionremix with gamma kernel.
Or stock based rom like super or alpha rom with mk2000 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Resurrection doesn't have the second screen working. I was thinking on Alpha as the next choice. But before I do...what do you think about WETA rom?
prahsper said:
Kinda figured that...thanks. Would you happen to know of any great up to date stable roms and kernels that offer great battery life as well as performance? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alpha Omega with mk2000 kernel for the win, lineage roms have to many shortcomings
Sent from my LG-H910 using XDA Labs
i am using wetarom with weta kernel, and i can tell you that quick charge do work
prahsper said:
Resurrection doesn't have the second screen working. I was thinking on Alpha as the next choice. But before I do...what do you think about WETA rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paul999 said:
i am using wetarom with weta kernel, and i can tell you that quick charge do work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weta rom and kernel are equally as abandoned. The two current stock based roms (that have the second screen etc working exactly as usual) are Alpha and Super