GApps for Android 6.0 - ONE General

I've flashed unofficial CM13 by @CraZY_BoY^ and realize there's not much compatible gapps for 6.0 and thus I present to you guys mine.
Inclusive:
Google Play Store
Google Play Services
Google Contacts Sync
Google Calender Sync
Google TTS Engine
And other files needed for GApps to work
Mod Gapps for 6.0: Mod edit: Link removed

Will try it out in a bit!
Thanks OP!

Thank you much needed

Thanks
Thank you sir!

Thanks! About to flash the unofficial CM13 ROM, so this came at a perfect timing. [emoji3]
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk

alternatively there is a WIP version of Slim GAPPS for marshmellow ...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/slimroms/general/gapps-official-slim-gapps-trds-slimkat-t2792842

Thanks. I'll he testing this out next time I update my current 6.0 rom.

lbaty said:
alternatively there is a WIP version of Slim GAPPS for marshmellow ...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/slimroms/general/gapps-official-slim-gapps-trds-slimkat-t2792842
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's totally uncool to take Bobbi lim's thread off-topic by pointing to somebody else's work.

CafeKampuchia said:
It's totally uncool to take Bobbi lim's thread off-topic by pointing to somebody else's work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks @CafeKampuchia
The OP mentioned "there's not much compatible gapps for 6.0".
I was trying to help with options, I didn't mean to downplay or undermine his efforts.
I see your point though.
Sorry if I offended anyone, that wasn't my intention.

@lbaty, no problem. We're all learning here.

CafeKampuchia said:
It's totally uncool to take Bobbi lim's thread off-topic by pointing to somebody else's work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you'll unzip the gapps and look at the g.prop file you'll see this is actually a slim gapps (see screenshot).
This is not the first time that @Bobbi lim takes credit for things he didn't do, for example his ROMs optimization which he claim are something unique he invented and he refuse to share is actually an init.d nitro mod which he refused to give credit and when confronted he gets angry...
Sent from my A0001 using XDA Free mobile app

12. Using the work of others.
If you are developing something that is based on the work of another Member, you MUST first seek their permission and you must give credit to the member whose work you used. If a dispute occurs about who developed / created a piece of work, first try to settle the matter by private message and NOT in open forum. If this fails, you may then contact a Moderator and provide clear evidence that the work was created by you.
Convincing evidence will result in the copied work being removed. If there is no clear evidence that it was you who created the work, then in the spirit of sharing, all work will remain posted on the forums.
As an addition, developers have the right to hold exclusivity over their work for as long as it is deemed necessary by that developer. However, if the work is claimed as exclusive, it must remain as such. No selective sharing will be allowed (ie, allowing certain people to use it and not others). If the developer decides to start sharing the work with others, the work automatically becomes available for all to use, albeit with the relevant credit displayed.
When permission has already been given, unless there is a very valid reason, it cannot be revoked (same applies to major updates on the work). Under that same premise, permissions cannot be denied unless the work is exclusive or under extreme circumstances.
In plain English: If you want to keep your work exclusive, go for it. However, if you are going to share your work, do it fairly.
Reposted content, derivative or maintaned works based on that of former or banned members may be removed at our discretion.
These rules apply to all software posted on XDA (including but not limited to ROMs, RUUs, apps, games, kernels, themes, icons, etc) unless that software comes with a license that waives these rules.
Thread closed
For those wanting the actual Slim GApps package by @dankoman, follow the link posted below.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/slimroms/general/gapps-official-slim-gapps-trds-slimkat-t2792842

Related

[MOD]Hey Snapdragon! Mod - 4/14/15

Disclaimer
I'm not responsible for anything that may happen to your device. I've tested this mod to the best of my abilities, but I can't guarantee anything. Make a complete backup before applying any of these changes. If you brick your device, boot loop, lose data, or etc...again, I'm not responsible.
CM12 - Working
- CM12S YNG1TAS0YL with stock kernel
- CM12 nightly with stock kernel
CM11 - Working
- CM11S XNPH30O, XNPH33R, XNPH38R, XNPH44S, and XNPH05Q with stock kernel
- CM11, PAC-man, crDroid with most recent kernels
- franco r35 kernel
CM12.1 - Not Working
- CM12.1 nightly (bootloop)
CM11 - Not Working
- LiquidSmooth ROM (mediaserver seg faults immediately)
- OmniROM
Also, I found a commit in the CM source that adds Voice Wakeup options to the Settings app. If the ROM doesn't have this code compiled into their Settings, the mod will probably not work. You'll still be able to go through the training process, however, I don't believe Google Now will launch because the intent action is never being set.
Instructions
1.) Backup any important data on your phone (files, pictures, etc.)
2.) Boot into recovery. I use and have only tested with TWRP
3.) Make a nandroid backup
4.) Flash the mod
5.) Reboot
Recovery
If you encounter any issues (e.g. bootloop) or just want to remove the mod, go into recovery and restore just the System partition from the backup you made earlier (this will preserve your Data partition).
After Installation
After installing, you'll get a notification to enable Voice Wakeup and to train your voice. You can do this now or skip it. It can always be setup later by going to:
CM11: Settings --> Voice Wakeup --> Retrain your voice
CM12: Settings --> Language & Input --> Voice Wakeup --> Retrain your voice
Also...
1.) Go into the Google Now settings and disable "OK Google" detection settings.
2.) Disable your lockscreen if on CM11S or CM12S...other CM11/CM12 based ROMs should work fine since the apk is signed correctly. Some users have reported being able to use a 3rd party lockscreen (e.g AcDisplay) as a work around for CM11S.
If something is not working for you, I need the following or I can't help...
- The ROM you're using (date/version too)
- The kernel you're using (date/version too)
- A description of the problem
- A logcat of the problem in action
Changelog
Code:
[I]4-14-2015[/I]
- New test version for CM12 based ROMs. I believe this should work with most kernels.
[I]Version 2.0[/I]
- CM11 based ROMs only
- Updated mixer_paths.xml with more recent version from CM11
- Deodexed, signed, and zip aligned VoiceWakeup.apk. The app can now bypass the lockscreen on CM11 based ROMs
Disabling the lockscreen is still necessary for CM11S ROMs because those keys aren't public
- Added a "loud" version. It increases the microphone volume levels to make it more sensitive
[I]Version 1.0[/I]
- Initial Release
Woow. It seems working flawlessly
me wanty. Hopefully you can post a how to in the near future
Added to OnePlus One index thread:
[INDEX] OnePlus One Resources Compilation Roll-Up
Transmitted via Bacon
jojo_whit3 said:
I bought the OnePlus One in August because I was interested in the always on listening feature that they showed off back in the Spring. So when I actually received the phone, I was pretty disappointed to learn that they took the feature out before shipping. Over the past couple weeks, I've been working on a way to get this feature back in the phone and I think I finally got it working pretty well. I've only tested it on the 25R and 33R builds, but it should work on most ROMs for this phone. The mod uses the always on low power core, so there's no significant drop in battery life. I know Qualcomm has some licenses for this IP, so I'm still trying to figure out if I can legally post the mod here. But in the meantime, here's a demo of it working...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just curious, would this mod stop ota updates and if so is it easily reversible? Looks really nice.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
share it pls!
Overdose1986 said:
share it pls!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read the OP?
I know Qualcomm has some licenses for this IP, so I'm still trying to figure out if I can legally post the mod here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Transmitted via Bacon
looks cool, do keep us updated if you are able to share this "legally" or can you pm me the "not so legal" way? LOL
I didn't know I wanted this until now
That looks awesome
I've been trying to contact someone from the Cyanogen team to get some more information about posting this. If anyone has any contact info, either send me a PM or send them over to this thread.
To give a little more information about this mod, its essentially a port of the VoiceWakeup.apk I found here. If you use apktool to disassemble this file, it's easy to tell it came directly from Qualcomm. However, if the Cyanogen team intended to release this apk with the phone initially, then I'm assuming they already have some agreement in place with Qualcomm. So hopefully that also means it'll be ok for me to post this mod in the near future.
26.2man said:
Just curious, would this mod stop ota updates and if so is it easily reversible? Looks really nice.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You would still be able to download the OTA updates, but you wouldn't be able to apply them since there would be changes to your file system. If you make a nandroid backup in recovery, then anything is easily reversible.
Thanks. Hope you can release this soon.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Looks great, wonder if the cm team is working to make it work by choosing you own wake up command. Had it on my find 7a and saying snapdragon was strange
If it's already freely available then it's unlikely to cause any more issues, depends on what did you do to"port" it I guess.
All the cm11s apps have been made available, so if it came from an existing rom I can't really see much of an issue. But I'm not a lawyer
Alternative is to post a walkthrough of your changes to the original.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Awesome work, hopefully you're and to post it up for us eventually.
Hi Everyone...I did a little thread cleaning. Please, lets not harass the OP about when this will be released. Like everything else on xda, it will be released when the developer is ready. Just as a reminder to everyone,
yes this is a hackers site, but certain things are not allowed. If the OP wants to make sure that he isn't violating CMs or Qualcomm's Intellectual Property then we should let him do this to his own satisfaction. Nobody
wants to see a modification removed because CM or Qualcomm complained.
Thanks!
This looks really good! Would love to have this feature, keep it up man
If you're worried about posting the modded APK and the IP issues, can you at least let us know what you modded so we can do it on our own?
had a quick play with it earlier,
Cm 11 nightly contains the background libs (except liblisten.so) but there's some java calls missing. Curious that cm have left most of the libs in place.

[ROM][I9295(jactivelte)][5.0.2] SlimLP [UN-OFFICIAL]

SlimLP Android 5.0
SlimRoms is a custom android operating system. The main goal is to offer users a slimmed down but still feature rich alternative to other android operating systems.
The entire SlimTeam work together to bring you this tailor-made beauty straight from Android Open Source Project (AOSP) source code.
All of the sources can be publicly viewed through GitHub and you can stop by the public Gerrit to submit patches of any type.
SlimLP is currently in alpha / beta stage, some custom features are already in place, but much much more is planned for the future.
Download:
First build , Date : 1/29/2015
https://s.basketbuild.com/filedl/devs?dev=mythi&dl=mythi/slim/Slim-jactivelte-5.0.2.alpha.0.91-UNOFFICIAL-20150129-1852.zip
Second build , Date : 2/3/2015
https://s.basketbuild.com/filedl/devs?dev=mythi&dl=mythi/slim/Slim-jactivelte-5.0.2.alpha.0.91-UNOFFICIAL-20150203-1046.zip
Third build , Date : 2/11/2015
https://s.basketbuild.com/filedl/devs?dev=mythi&dl=mythi/slim/Slim-jactivelte-5.0.2.alpha.0.91-UNOFFICIAL-20150211-1836.zip
Google Apps / How to
Our resident Gapps guru, @dankoman, is still working on our custom Gapps. For now please use those provided here.
Important links:
slimroms.net - The official webpage where you find everything you need to know about SlimRoms.
Downloads - Download the rom, gapps and other addons.
Installation instructions - Follow these steps to the letter if you're about to install SlimRoms on your device.
Latest Changelog - Read here if you want information on changes in latest build.
Slim FAQ
Kernel Source - The source of your device's kernel.
Get in touch! - Contact SlimRoms at these places if you have questions, requests or feedback.
Google+
Twitter
Facebook
Forum
Disclaimer: SlimRoms are not responsible for any damages to your device.
Kernel Source
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_samsung_jf/tree/cm-12.0
Device Trees used :
for jactivelte
https://github.com/hashem78/android_device_samsung_jactivelte/tree/slimlp
-----
for jf-common
https://github.com/hashem78/android_device_samsung_jf-common/tree/slimlp
Thanks to :
SlimRoms
Cm
@AntaresOne
@spegelius
@rebelos
@olarf
me :victory:
Why do you put TARGET_DEVICE=jfltespr in slim.mk?
https://github.com/hashem78/android_device_samsung_jactivelte/tree/slimlp
...
PRODUCT_BUILD_PROP_OVERRIDES += \
PRODUCT_NAME=jactivelte TARGET_DEVICE=jactivelte \
TARGET_DEVICE=jfltespr \
BUILD_FINGERPRINT="sams....
That's Samsung Galaxy S4 (Sprint) while you claim this slim build is for Samsung Galaxy S4 (Intl ) Active i9295.
@O-T using words like "claim" will easy trigger a defensive stance on many persons. Are you not happy to have the second 5.02 rom for your device? Or you just can't do better.
Its almost like next thing a army of lawyers will jump on the mod… learn to chose words dude…. No one ows you nothing
O-T said:
Why do you put TARGET_DEVICE=jfltespr in slim.mk?
https://github.com/hashem78/android_device_samsung_jactivelte/tree/slimlp
...
PRODUCT_BUILD_PROP_OVERRIDES += \
PRODUCT_NAME=jactivelte TARGET_DEVICE=jactivelte \
TARGET_DEVICE=jfltespr \
BUILD_FINGERPRINT="sams....
That's Samsung Galaxy S4 (Sprint) while you claim this slim build is for Samsung Galaxy S4 (Intl ) Active i9295.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@O-T words I am not claiming anything , check your facts and come back
https://github.com/spegelius/android_device_samsung_jactivelte/blob/cm-12.0/cm.mk this is how I found it in @spegelius and cm does it ., BTW the value isn't important because it adds a check in updater script to determine whether this is a gs4 for sprint or gs4 active .
Oh damn, i wondered why adb shell shows jfltespr, need to fix this. Copypasta error.
And nce work mythi :good:
spegelius said:
Oh damn, i wondered why adb shell shows jfltespr, need to fix this. Copypasta error.
And nce work mythi :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol yeah i was about to remove the flaag in the next build was debugging some apps and noticed jfltespr in log lol ,
thanks for your thanking me
mauk said:
@O-T using words like "claim" will easy trigger a defensive stance on many persons. Are you not happy to have the second 5.02 rom for your device? Or you just can't do better.
Its almost like next thing a army of lawyers will jump on the mod… learn to chose words dude…. No one ows you nothing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Despite English is not my native language I usually spell and construct grammatically as best I can to avoid misunderstanding. Sorry if that single word offended you.
Also sorry for not including fancy words like dude, bro, man, guys, lol, rofl or more of this kind.
In respect of the person who is addressed I will not fall to the level of calling anyone dude, bro, man or guys when male/female is unknown.
Status
Dear OP, I would like to know the latest status of this ROM though it has only been posted a few days ago. Do you have any plan on releasing new updates for this ROM in the nearest time? Thanks.
amruhaidy said:
Dear OP, I would like to know the latest status of this ROM though it has only been posted a few days ago. Do you have any plan on releasing new updates for this ROM in the nearest time? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes , i will , but i dont see slim adding much features in daily so weeklies will do it until slim adds all their features
O-T said:
Despite English is not my native language I usually spell and construct grammatically as best I can to avoid misunderstanding. Sorry if that single word offended you.
Also sorry for not including fancy words like dude, bro, man, guys, lol, rofl or more of this kind.
In respect of the person who is addressed I will not fall to the level of calling anyone dude, bro, man or guys when male/female is unknown.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry of i offended you.. Not my intention… I just hope you got my point… if not, well...others will put it in worst words then I did when it will be the case ..cheers and I am omw with the install.
Thanks for this ROM. It works like a charm for an early build and I'm expecting the next updates will be better. Good job to OP and everyone that worked together. Just to report that NFC isn't working but I hardly see it as a problem since I never use it anyway.
EDIT - Enabled ROOT from the Developers Option but how do I get SuperSU works here? Or do I even need one? Thanks
amruhaidy said:
Thanks for this ROM. It works like a charm for an early build and I'm expecting the next updates will be better. Good job to OP and everyone that worked together. Just to report that NFC isn't working but I hardly see it as a problem since I never use it anyway.
EDIT - Enabled ROOT from the Developers Option but how do I get SuperSU works here? Or do I even need one? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never used nfc personally too , but I will work on it the next build , if you want SuperSu from chainfire simply the supersu zip from recovery(make sure you have enable root from developer options)
Tested first alpha version.
* MP3 ring tones not working, (same issue for 1101, 2501, 2701, 3001 and now 3101 official, Unofficial )
Really strange :-/
Another issue that I just found is the Camera sometimes unresponsive and Unable to connect the camera message popped up. Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9295 using XDA Free mobile app
camera not working
This fix works for the camera.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s3/themes-apps/17-fixed-camera-app-lib-cm-aosp-roms-t2505973
@ mauk - I've had a run in with @O-T before - It seems to be a serial offender when it comes to flaming people - There are only so many times that you can use the excuse of something not being your native language. @ O-T The sensible way would be to ask someone who has english as a first language to read you posts first.... that way any unpleasantness can be avoided - If you want to PM me your posts I'll check them over. As for being called dude - as far as I'm aware it can be non gender specific term - so no offence caused there!
Thanks for the sharing! But I'm gonna wait for the OP to fix this issue in the future build.
Sent from my GT-I9295 using XDA Free mobile app
SuperSU for root on Lollipop - tested working
@amruhaidy
http://forum.xda-developers.com/apps/supersu/2014-09-02-supersu-v2-05-t2868133
nasaprinsloo said:
@amruhaidy
http://forum.xda-developers.com/apps/supersu/2014-09-02-supersu-v2-05-t2868133
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks dude. That matter had been resolved but it's good that you share, someone might need it. Thanks!
Sent from my GT-I9295 using XDA Free mobile app
injenue said:
This fix works for the camera.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s3/themes-apps/17-fixed-camera-app-lib-cm-aosp-roms-t2505973
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure thats for gs3 bro

UPDATE! [Note 4] [N910P] [24-07-2016] [PD1][MM 6.0.1] N4 EchoeRom v4-PD1!

The Wait is Over....
EchoeRom v4 released!
Get it here!!!!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4-sprint/development/rom-echoerom-v4-redemption-t3424993
MM Sprint Modular EchoeRom v3.2
First of all i didn't meant to do wrong, and if i did, i apologize to the developers and XDA, i tried to do something good but went to be misinterpreted. All credits to the respective developers on each item. This can be considered a Modular ROM, why? You take what you like, you leavewhat you hate. Also this way i respect the download count of all the other developers and at the same time if you come to install the rom let's say next month, you probably will get updated mods by that time. MM 6.0.1 is a little nasty when you pack so many mods, doing them one at a time can guarantee more stability. Take it or leave it
Features after all the process:
Based on Stock DeOdexed N910PVPS4DPD1 by @tx_dbs_tx
Super Su Systemless 2.71 from the man that needs no introduction @Chainfire
Busybox 1.24.2 by @osm0sis
BeastMode r51 Kernel Enforcing-Permissive ZeroLemon enabled by @freeza (Thank you so much for this special edition!)
ECHOE ROM Bootanimation by @friedrich420
N5 Multiwindow by @friedrich420
Removed SD notification by @friedrich420
Removed Safe warning volume and Disable USB wakeup by @friedrich420
Systemless Xposed 85.5 by @topjohnwu
Material Xposed Installer by @DVDandroid (Note: Standard Xposed Installer does NOT work with Systemless Xposed)
Kernel Adiutor-Mod V13 by @Yoinx
Double tap Home Flashlight without wakelock (app by A-App, instructions by @and2)
Dolby ATMOS 6.5 by @worstenbrood
Viper4Android MK MOD by @metaspook
Updated Qualcomm Adreno GPU Drivers by @mastero9017
TurboMod for Qualcomm Processors by @warBeard_actual
Multiple CSC and XML Tweaks (like toolbox ) by myself @carlosggb
S7 Clock (unlimited snooze Yeah!) by @Alberteno
S7 Calculator by @Alberteno
S7 Call-in-UI (you can swipe the call square and continue using the phone normally)by @Alberteno
All toggles Enabled
Additional Notification sounds (i think from Note 5, dont remember now)
Some build.prop tweaks
Other tweaks that i can remember now... dash
Install Instructions
1-Flash ODIN Sprint PC1 -> Download here Thanks @Sunderwear!
2-Let it boot and pass the wizard
3-Flash TWRP 3.0.2 -> Download here
4-Enter Recovery and Wipe everything except Ext SD (where you are going to have the rom and files)
5-Flash Sprint Echoerom 3.2 -> Download here
6-Boot up, complete the wizard, let the phone settle a min!
7-Install Material Xposed Installer and go back to recovery -> Download here
8-Flash Systemless Xposed -> Download here
9-Now the delicated part, install Kernel Adiutor-Mod -> Download here
10-On Kernel Adiutor-Mod enable init.d Emulation and on Misc Controls set SE Linux to Permissive (Mark "Apply on boot" on the top right corner)
11-Flash Dolby ATMOS 6.5 and reboot -> Download here
12-Flash Viper4Android MK Mod 3.6 reboot and wait 2min for background install to complete. -> Download here
13-Open Viper4Android give SU access and hit yes to Driver install, reboot when asked
14-Wait 2min again, YES AGAIN, and then open Viper4Android, it should be working by now
15-Now to have all toggle permanently and enable flashlight on double tap home you need to run an ADB Script on your pc and install the A-App Flashlight app
16-Unzip This File on a folder, make sure your phone has ADB Debugging enabled and run ECHOE.bat with the phone connected to the PC. Reset toggles and Voila!
17-Install A-Flashlight and Reboot -> Download here
18-DONE!
OPEN FOR REQUEST!
MD5 of the rom 1f1ae6709840cf22b03e26f4234510fc
XDA:DevDB Information
EchoeRom v3.2, ROM for the Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note 4
Contributors
carlosggb
ROM OS Version: 6.0.x Marshmallow
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.10.x
ROM Firmware Required: PC1, PD1
Version Information
Status: Stable
Current Stable Version: 3.2
Stable Release Date: 2016-06-20
Created 2016-06-20
Last Updated 2016-06-20
Reserved
Mods in progress.... Dark Interface
All access is denied?
Sent from my SM-N910P using XDA-Developers mobile app
Glad to see another Echoe Rom for the Sprint Note 4 . Downloading now.
Access denied?
CoronaDabs said:
Access denied?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry i just notice that, in two hours ill be at home abd fix it with direct links
carlosggb said:
Sorry i just notice that, in two hours ill be at home abd fix it with direct links
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thx
I'm not a mod here but I don't like what i'm seeing. There's absolutely zero information about the ROM and for the users here at XDa that are unaware, Echoe rom website has been back and forth on who they allow to view their forums and access their download links, etc. The only way this ROM and it's links can be seen and downloaded is if the Echoe site un-restricts that thread specifically. this also means that other areas of their site will still remain restricted only to those who have registered and have been approved to view their forums. I understand completely why the Echoe team takes this approach but as it is right now this ROM thread is a poor attempt to attract attention to that site and I vote to shut this thread down in it's tracks unless full access and complete rom details are given here in this thread. I am disappointed in this to be quite honest.
tx_dbs_tx said:
I'm not a mod here but I don't like what i'm seeing. There's absolutely zero information about the ROM and for the users here at XDa that are unaware, Echoe rom website has been back and forth on who they allow to view their forums and access their download links, etc. The only way this ROM and it's links can be seen and downloaded is if the Echoe site un-restricts that thread specifically. this also means that other areas of their site will still remain restricted only to those who have registered and have been approved to view their forums. I understand completely why the Echoe team takes this approach but as it is right now this ROM thread is a poor attempt to attract attention to that site and I vote to shut this thread down in it's tracks unless full access and complete rom details are given here in this thread. I am disappointed in this to be quite honest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My may im working on posting the direct links, believe me is not easy to keep both sides in peace but in a few everything will be settle.
carlosggb said:
My may im working on posting the direct links, believe me is not easy to keep both sides in peace but in a few everything will be settle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm curious to try this myself, I'll download as soon as the links are up.
sent from my droid
carlosggb said:
My may im working on posting the direct links, believe me is not easy to keep both sides in peace but in a few everything will be settle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a direct conflict of interest between this site and Echoe site. May I ask how come you can't host the rom and links here at XDA and an independent file hosting service outside of Echoe website? What's holding you to the Echoe site where access is restricted to select members? Especially since the base rom originated here at XDA on my behalf. Was this rom's mods, etc developed by other people at Echoe team other than yourself and myself as being the creator of the base rom? I don't get the reason for the "exclusivity" when the fact is the rom is not exclusive in no way shape or form other than a custom logo image added to the rom's ui. All mods and additional features such as ROM control, etc originated here at XDA by developers. So again... this is not something i can proudly support because it clearly contradicts and "takes" ideas and creations by XDA developrs and attempts to make it "exclusive" at the Echoe website. I'm only bringing up the obvious and i personally stand for and represent the best interest of XDA. Please reconsider these things.
tx_dbs_tx said:
There is a direct conflict of interest between this site and Echoe site. May I ask how come you can't host the rom and links here at XDA and an independent file hosting service outside of Echoe website? What's holding you to the Echoe site where access is restricted to select members? Especially since the base rom originated here at XDA on my behalf. Was this rom's mods, etc developed by other people at Echoe team other than yourself and myself as being the creator of the base rom? I don't get the reason for the "exclusivity" when the fact is the rom is not exclusive in no way shape or form other than a custom logo image added to the rom's ui. All mods and additional features such as ROM control, etc originated here at XDA by developers. So again... this is not something i can proudly support because it clearly contradicts and "takes" ideas and creations by XDA developrs and attempts to make it "exclusive" at the Echoe website. I'm only bringing up the obvious and i personally stand for and represent the best interest of XDA. Please reconsider these things.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree to this, there is no need to host the rom on a secondary site, plus they only allow certain users over at echoe.
CoronaDabs said:
I agree to this, there is no need to host the rom on a secondary site, plus they only allow certain users over at echoe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is my point exactly. I mean no offense to Carlos, I only would like to see you share your work more openly with no limitations from a secondary competing website. I'm sure most people here would agree. Anyway thanks for sharing your work.
tx_dbs_tx said:
This is my point exactly. I mean no offense to Carlos, I only would like to see you share your work more openly with no limitations from a secondary competing website. I'm sure most people here would agree. Anyway thanks for sharing your work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well said and Thank you! Host the files thru XDA. No need to go outside...and if you do, please tell us that and at least have active links without restrictions
Sent from my SM-N910P using XDA-Developers mobile app
May I see some screenshots of this rom before I install?
CoronaDabs said:
May I see some screenshots of this rom before I install?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure turn your phone on...waaalllllaaaa, it's just stock
CoronaDabs said:
May I see some screenshots of this rom before I install?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's stock bro the only screenshot worth sharing is the benchmark i did as it is, 75k
@CoronaDabs i uploaded screenshots, they are on the screenshots tab of this project, go check them out
From the Moderator
FIXED
Reopened
~~~ oka1
peewww at lest i download it before get close XD XD thanks for the tutorial anyway mr echo XD XD
Damn 17 steps is alot to install a ROM. Does it make coffee as u wait?
Sent from my SM-N910P using XDA-Developers mobile app

[ROM][7.1][NOUGAT][TESTING] CyanogenMod14.1-cohaolain [UNOFFICIAL]

Hey guys!
To prevent the other CM14.1 thread from getting too crowded I'll be putting my own builds up here
These builds will be based on the official source except I'll keep adding in new features and fixes before they're officially merged, and I'll be putting in some other small changes along the way if I feel they improve the experience without compromising on anything else
Currently working:
//All battery status indicators are fixed
//Pocket mode
Modifications:
//'Unofficial' tag removed from CyanogenMod version. It just made me squirm with the lack of aesthetic. Of course this is still an unofficial version!
Updated (//): 16.11.03
Download link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B88aOagl9VcCV3YtNFpwRzR1akk
Credit of course goes to CyanogenMod and all of its contributors for all of their work!
Disclaimer:
This software is provided by me "as is" and "with all faults." I make no representations or warranties of any kind concerning the safety, suitability, lack of viruses, inaccuracies, typographical errors, or other harmful components of this software. There are inherent dangers in the use of any software, and you are solely responsible for determining whether this software is compatible with your equipment and other software installed on your equipment. You are also solely responsible for the protection of your equipment and backup of your data, and I will not be liable for any damages you may suffer in connection with using, modifying, or distributing this software.
XDA:DevDB Information
CyanogenMod14.1-cohaolain, ROM for the OnePlus 3
Contributors
cohaolain
Source Code: https://github.com/cohaolain
ROM OS Version: 7.x Nougat
Version Information
Status: No Longer Updated
Current Beta Version: 7.1 (CM14.1)
Beta Release Date: 2016-11-04
Created 2016-10-31
Last Updated 2016-11-12
First...!!
Will definitely try it out.
Peace
Call Echo and no audio in video chat apps fixed ?
Two things that not allowing me to return to 7.1
Thanks for building and sharing your builds.
Btw are you open to suggestions or requests?
Nice work!
Can you remove cm setup wizard? Cos I'm a Chinese, and if I flash gapps, I can't pass it. And set selinux to permissive?
Thinks a lot!
silentvisitor said:
Call Echo and no audio in video chat apps fixed ?
Two things that not allowing me to return to 7.1
Thanks for building and sharing your builds.
Btw are you open to suggestions or requests?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my testing I haven't experienced any call echo. And I can't test video chat apps right now, so you'd have to check for that yourself mate, or wait for someone else to let you know here, sorry about that
No problem anyway mate, I'm only doing this on a learning curve. That said, I'm open to suggestions and requests, but they should be submitted without much expectation. This is my first ROM, and I'm pretty new to Android development. I can try my best, but I'm no expert. Although I do love a challenge, I can't make any guarantees
But for now I'm going to try and get Google Assistant working by default. We'll see after that
Great! When I have time I'll definitely give it a try.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
revive111 said:
Nice work!
Can you remove cm setup wizard? Cos I'm a Chinese, and if I flash gapps, I can't pass it. And set selinux to permissive?
Thinks a lot!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry mate, but I don't want to make such drastic changes, particularly ones that most people don't need
I think the setup wizard should stay, and that selinux is fine just the way it is.
Also, I'm not completely sure how to do either of these things anyway....
Can you include your personal Github sources such as device and kernel tree in the 1st post to actually see what changes you've done so far at the moment?
cohaolain said:
Sorry mate, but I don't want to make such drastic changes, particularly ones that most people don't need
I think the setup wizard should stay, and that selinux is fine just the way it is.
Also, I'm not completely sure how to do either of these things anyway....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK,fine.
In cm13, I can pass it without anything, just wait cm to fix this bug.
Thanks for this! :good:
saayuj98 said:
Can you include your personal Github sources such as device and kernel tree in the 1st post to actually see what changes you've done so far at the moment?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As soon as I've learned how to do that, I will do that.
If somebody could help me with this it'd be appreciated:
When ro.product.model=Pixel XL is added, 'Device model' in settings>about phone changes to Pixel XL, but when it's removed completely, it reverts back to ONEPLUS A300*.
Question is, when building, how can I make it skip checking the build.prop for the device name and just make it select the device name it defaults to when it's not specified in the build.prop, and where is this check located in source?
Thanks,
Ciarán
cohaolain said:
If somebody could help me with this it'd be appreciated:
When ro.product.model=Pixel XL is added, 'Device model' in settings>about phone changes to Pixel XL, but when it's removed completely, it reverts back to ONEPLUS A300*.
Question is, when building, how can I make it skip checking the build.prop for the device name and just make it select the device name it defaults to when it's not specified in the build.prop, and where is this check located in source?
Thanks,
Ciarán
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think its not possible( maybe I'm wrong in here) to change device model when you're building as it might create errors during build process. You might need to create a separate bash script I believe, for users to change that afterwards while flashing the ROM. Or create an Aroma Installer to give user an option to do that if he/she wants to.
which gapps should i flash opengapps 7.1 nano or opengapps 7.1 pico ?
Ashish Bhalla said:
which gapps should i flash opengapps 7.1 nano or opengapps 7.1 pico ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use pico gapps everytime(I like my system being less bloated). Nano is a good option too.
I suggest you to go with Nano.
Ashish Bhalla said:
which gapps should i flash opengapps 7.1 nano or opengapps 7.1 pico ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend pico, but nano is fine if you don't want Google Now, or Now on Tap, or Assistant and stuff.
saayuj98 said:
I think its not possible( maybe I'm wrong in here) to change device model when you're building as it might create errors during build process. You might need to create a separate bash script I believe, for users to change that afterwards while flashing the ROM. Or create an Aroma Installer to give user an option to do that if he/she wants to.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly yeah.
I ran a build that included the two lines to enable Google Assistant, it just ended up discarding the Pixel XL line like it had never been put in there at all.
Google Assistant ran fine for a while, until I cleared Google''s data. Assistant comes up straight after the wipe, but goes back to Now on Tap again afterwards.
Can i install aroma installer open gapps 7.1 on this? If yes how.. I flashed it on this rom but then on booting google services are crashing continuously play store is also not opening.. So some can help plz on this?
cohaolain said:
Possibly yeah.
I ran a build that included the two lines to enable Google Assistant, it just ended up discarding the Pixel XL line like it had never been put in there at all.
Google Assistant ran fine for a while, until I cleared Google''s data. Assistant comes up straight after the wipe, but goes back to Now on Tap again afterwards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe init.d
---------- Post added at 04:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:40 PM ----------
cohaolain said:
In my testing I haven't experienced any call echo. And I can't test video chat apps right now, so you'd have to check for that yourself mate, or wait for someone else to let you know here, sorry about that
No problem anyway mate, I'm only doing this on a learning curve. That said, I'm open to suggestions and requests, but they should be submitted without much expectation. This is my first ROM, and I'm pretty new to Android development. I can try my best, but I'm no expert. Although I do love a challenge, I can't make any guarantees
But for now I'm going to try and get Google Assistant working by default. We'll see after that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really impressed by your overall response.
You can be a great developer one day. Humility, curiosity and simplicity are hallmarks.
Good luck :good:
ankushgautam said:
Can i install aroma installer open gapps 7.1 on this? If yes how.. I flashed it on this rom but then on booting google services are crashing continuously play store is also not opening.. So some can help plz on this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've read abouyt some bugs with the Aroma installer in 14.1. I'm not even sure if this is a CM problem or a Gapps problem, but for now, stick with pico or something pre-packaged if you can
silentvisitor said:
Really impressed by your overall response.
You can be a great developer one day. Humility, curiosity and simplicity are hallmarks.
Good luck :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks mate Maybe, maybe . Gotta finish school first!
init.d, hm. Mysterious to me. I've heard tell of it many times but never learned too much about it. Better start reading up

Dirty Unicorn Rom

Anyone running DU rom . If you can help me out. How to install latest version. Which version to install. Noticed there's 3 different for clark. Official, RC, Nightlies ? Which Gapps to install. Banks , Dynamic , TBO. ? Thanks.
StankFiss said:
Anyone running DU rom . If you can help me out. How to install latest version. Which version to install. Noticed there's 3 different for clark. Official, RC, Nightlies ? Which Gapps to install. Banks , Dynamic , TBO. ? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend you go to their Google+ page, they do not want any of their roms discussed or passed along on XDA any longer.
Below is a link in case you can not Google it, read carefully before adding questions. I would recommend the 10.5 Official as their most stable, the 11 has been released but has a few things to still work out. If you try the 11 stays with Dynamic gapps, if you go with the MM version Open is fine.
MOD EDIT: removed external link
Jimi Mack said:
I recommend you go to their Google+ page, they do not want any of their roms discussed or passed along on XDA any longer.
Below is a link in case you can not Google it, read carefully before adding questions. I would recommend the 10.5 Official as their most stable, the 11 has been released but has a few things to still work out. If you try the 11 stays with Dynamic gapps, if you go with the MM version Open is fine.
MOD EDIT: removed external link
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why they dont want their work shared on XDA?
Pyramid Head said:
Why they dont want their work shared on XDA?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they do not and they clearly state this. XDA is no longer what it once was and many Dev's have drifted away from here.
Jimi Mack said:
No, they do not and they clearly state this. XDA is no longer what it once was and many Dev's have drifted away from here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know that they do not want their work shared here, ive seen the posts but do you know if something in particular happened?
Pyramid Head said:
I know that they do not want their work shared here, ive seen the posts but do you know if something in particular happened?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, no I do not know of any details, just that they are done dealing with XDA.
While not sure if this happened to DU but I do know that for awhile mods and admins here in some areas were allowing people to take credit for work they did not do with no repercussions. A number of Devs got very angry when little jerks were taking their work and renaming Roms and using tools they had built without giving credit. This blew up into a big tiff and a number of very good devs left XDA and even some major project players like DU left and have not been back. I have no idea why this was allowed to transpire but it was ugly for about a year. I suspect there were other behind the scenes issues that I as a non dev was not aware of as well.

Categories

Resources