Has anyone heard the native aspect ratio for the camera sensors? On the Nexus 6 it was 16:9 on the front but 4:3 on the back. I can handle the front being 16:9, but if the back isn't 4:3 I will be seriously annoyed. I was hoping for a jump to 16mp so this would further hurt my pictures because I would be forced to crop down to 4:3.
If you know, please link to a source.
I may have answered my own question doing a search for sample photos turns up this:
http://cdn02.androidauthority.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/IMG_20150928_202643.jpg
It has a resolution of 4032x3024 which equates to 12,192,768 pixels. So that seems perfect for 4:3. Good job google.
Poke_N_PDA said:
I may have answered my own question doing a search for sample photos turns up this:
http://cdn02.androidauthority.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/IMG_20150928_202643.jpg
It has a resolution of 4032x3024 which equates to 12,192,768 pixels. So that seems perfect for 4:3. Good job google.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in a world becoming far more dependent on pictures being viewed on 16:9 screens instead of being printed on paper, i find 4:3 to be highly annoying.
indianajonze said:
in a world becoming far more dependent on pictures being viewed on 16:9 screens instead of being printed on paper, i find 4:3 to be highly annoying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can change it to 16:9 but you lose a lot of pixels
yeah thats the problem. it's been a struggle since nexus 5 for me
16:9 is good for Video and smartphone screens. Nothing else. It is horrible for framing a single photo.
just my 2 cents.
Related
Which do you prefer and why?
I'm so torn between the two 13mp seems to catch a slightly more crisp picture than 6mp but 6mp is a wider shot which fills the s4 screen well when showing images to friends and also its bigger on a computer screen when uploading to facebook.
You can use 9.6MP, it's also 16:9 ratio
noideaforusername said:
You can use 9.6MP, it's also 16:9 ratio
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly what I am using 9.6. Really nice, enough quality, and like the Thread implies, fills the screen, which makes a huge difference.
Could it be possible to "unlock" the camera app of the later Z* phones (in my case Z2) to support filming in 4:3 in 720p or 1080p? Shouldn't it be technically possible, considering how the 1280x720/1920x1080 recording is just a cropped picture of 4:3.
I personally would rather film in 4:3 and get the full picture that the sensor can grab instead of this pseudo-widescreen. Perhaps 1280x960 or 960x720.. anything above that VGA 640x480, really
Maybe I'm alone with this, lol...
Why would you want to film in 4:3 when every screen on the planet is now widescreen?
Incanity said:
Why would you want to film in 4:3 when every screen on the planet is now widescreen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because if I want to crop my video/pictures, I don't need the source to be cropped, I can easily do so in my videoplayer or by videoediting later on.
I like being able to capture as much as the sensor supports and most sensors are 4:3 so I don't need this pseudo-widescreen
Do you also use the Sony stabilization function? Just incase you want to crop your image even further, ha.
Hi guys
Noticed that on the 6p, the pixel were much lower if u choose 16:9
Which do u perfer to shoot with? 4:3 with more pixel, or 16:9 with less pixel?
and why you do it?
Thanks.
I prefer the 16:9 just because it fills the entire screen. It would be nice if we could have it both ways though.
murphyjasonc said:
I prefer the 16:9 just because it fills the entire screen. It would be nice if we could have it both ways though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but the 16:9 has a lesser pixel? do u notice the picture in 16:9 have a lesser quality compare to 4:3?
I also like that the 16:9 fill the entire screen, but the quality to me is important too
mousefai0922 said:
but the 16:9 has a lesser pixel? do u notice the picture in 16:9 have a lesser quality compare to 4:3?
I also like that the 16:9 fill the entire screen, but the quality to me is important too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been using both off and on. To me the difference is minimal. The 4:3 seems to be a little better in low light but in bright light I can't tell the difference. I've been using open camera app to shoot 16:9 and google camera to shoot 4:3. I haven't settled on one or the other as my main shooter yet though. I'm debating on trying pro camera to see how it does. It won't be the first couple of dollars I've wasted if it isn't any better. I'm trying to find a good one that will shoot stills while taking video. I got used to that coming from my note 3 and then G4.
murphyjasonc said:
I've been using both off and on. To me the difference is minimal. The 4:3 seems to be a little better in low light but in bright light I can't tell the difference. I've been using open camera app to shoot 16:9 and google camera to shoot 4:3. I haven't settled on one or the other as my main shooter yet though. I'm debating on trying pro camera to see how it does. It won't be the first couple of dollars I've wasted if it isn't any better. I'm trying to find a good one that will shoot stills while taking video. I got used to that coming from my note 3 and then G4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm in the same boat. While I enjoy 16:9 mostly, I prefer to get as much quality to my pictures as possible with the 4:3 before any processing. That said - ProShot looks pretty nice, but unfortunately it's reported changing EV has been disabled? What a dumb move by Google...
murphyjasonc said:
I've been using both off and on. To me the difference is minimal. The 4:3 seems to be a little better in low light but in bright light I can't tell the difference. I've been using open camera app to shoot 16:9 and google camera to shoot 4:3. I haven't settled on one or the other as my main shooter yet though. I'm debating on trying pro camera to see how it does. It won't be the first couple of dollars I've wasted if it isn't any better. I'm trying to find a good one that will shoot stills while taking video. I got used to that coming from my note 3 and then G4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the full screen disply on 16:9 is one of the main reason i choose to use it. It just kinda weird to have black space on the side.....
i havent try any other camera software.. any recommendation u have?
mousefai0922 said:
the full screen disply on 16:9 is one of the main reason i choose to use it. It just kinda weird to have black space on the side.....
i havent try any other camera software.. any recommendation u have?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried several that are in the play store. For me open camera works the best out of the free ones. Search for open camera in the play store and give it a try. It had way more options than the google camera app.
Camera sensors are generally 4:3, even professional ones most the time are.
16:9 crops the sensor, hence lower megapixelsis
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
ALWAYS use 4:3 because only this way you will get all the pixels. You can resize it later and cut it down to whatever ratio you want - but you can never do it the other way round (without losing quality).
Yeah, the 4:3 vs 16:9 thing has been on my mind lately too... I like 16:9 pictures better, but when I compare the pictures I take, the only difference I notice is the 16:9 is basically zoomed in. You get no "wider" view, it just basically crops the top and bottom of the image off. There is a camera app or two that I've used that does make it wider, but those don't seem quite as nice as an image.
tele_jas said:
Yeah, the 4:3 vs 16:9 thing has been on my mind lately too... I like 16:9 pictures better, but when I compare the pictures I take, the only difference I notice is the 16:9 is basically zoomed in. You get no "wider" view, it just basically crops the top and bottom of the image off. There is a camera app or two that I've used that does make it wider, but those don't seem quite as nice as an image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the aspect ratio of the sensor is 4:3, so it cuts of pixels until you get 16:9. Changing the aspect ratio without interpolation is only possible by cropping. Interpolation is what happens in the apps you mention which leads to decreased quality.
mousefai0922 said:
but the 16:9 has a lesser pixel? do u notice the picture in 16:9 have a lesser quality compare to 4:3?
I also like that the 16:9 fill the entire screen, but the quality to me is important too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't get lesser quality when shooting in 16:9, it's the exact same quality. The only difference is the image is cropped at the top and bottom to achieve the 16:9 aspect ratio.
What's weird is the S6, Note5, and G4 have the full resolution at 16:9, where the 4:3 was a cropped version of 16:9.
I shoot in 4:3 to have the full 12.2MP image. I can always crop it later.
italia0101 said:
Camera sensors are generally 4:3, even professional ones most the time are.
16:9 crops the sensor, hence lower megapixelsis
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what do u mean by crop the sensor?
Valynor said:
ALWAYS use 4:3 because only this way you will get all the pixels. You can resize it later and cut it down to whatever ratio you want - but you can never do it the other way round (without losing quality).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but let say i shoot in 4:3, how can i cut it down to 16:9?
tele_jas said:
Yeah, the 4:3 vs 16:9 thing has been on my mind lately too... I like 16:9 pictures better, but when I compare the pictures I take, the only difference I notice is the 16:9 is basically zoomed in. You get no "wider" view, it just basically crops the top and bottom of the image off. There is a camera app or two that I've used that does make it wider, but those don't seem quite as nice as an image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i do noticed that too
So to clarify, 4:3 has a wider angle and 16:9 is zoomed in right?
i just like the feeling that 16:9 takes up ur whole screen when viewing on photo app
Heisenberg said:
You don't get lesser quality when shooting in 16:9, it's the exact same quality. The only difference is the image is cropped at the top and bottom to achieve the 16:9 aspect ratio.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so like other user are saying, is good to take it as 4:3 since u can edit later on but u cant edit when u shoot on 16:9 right?
mousefai0922 said:
but let say i shoot in 4:3, how can i cut it down to 16:9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use any picture editor that features a "crop" function and remove part of the top and bottom of the original 4:3 picture until you get a 16:9 ratio or any other ratio you like (e.g. 3:2 is also common). Done.
It's the same as taking the shot in 16:9 but this way you can decide later which parts of the 4:3 you want to cut off (only top, only bottom or part of both).
mousefai0922 said:
so like other user are saying, is good to take it as 4:3 since u can edit later on but u cant edit when u shoot on 16:9 right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you technically could edit a 16:9 image down to a 4:3 ratio by cropping the sides off the image. Doing this will result in an image containing even less pixels though. If you're really worried about it just take photos in the 4:3 ratio and crop them to 16:9 if you need to. I just have mine set to 16:9 all the time, I don't like the look of images in the 4:3 ratio. Using 16:9 allows the images to fill the screen on my phone, my tv, and my laptop (mostly).
Heisenberg said:
Well you technically could edit a 16:9 image down to a 4:3 ratio by cropping the sides off the image. Doing this will result in an image containing even less pixels though. If you're really worried about it just take photos in the 4:3 ratio and crop them to 16:9 if you need to. I just have mine set to 16:9 all the time, I don't like the look of images in the 4:3 ratio. Using 16:9 allows the images to fill the screen on my phone, my tv, and my laptop (mostly).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea, the only reason i will consider taking in 16:9 is that it fills the entire 6p screen
Just got my G6 and was looking at the camera settings and noticed the 18:9 default aspect ratio of photos was an 8.7MP photo and 4:3 is 13MP. Well we know the sensor is 13MP, so obviously anything wider than 4:3 is just a crop. So correct me if I'm wrong but choosing a wider photo ratio in settting isn't going to give you a wider field of view, all it's going to do is crop out the top and bottom of actual photo the sensor is registering which you could easily do in a photo editor. But you can't put the top and bottom back in, if you set the aspect ratio wider than 4:3.
So what is the idiotic thinking behind defaulting the camera to 18:9? I'm guessing the average user might be upset that the photo is not taking up the entire screen on their phone. It's odd that these days there's all these tests, reviews and debates about what smartphone has the best camera, and then you have the manufacturing setting the default camera settings to crop out the top and bottom of your photo.
Yep, AFAIK, all camera sensors are round, while all pictures we got are in square shape. So, such wide pictures as 18:9, 16:9 are all cropped.
Sent from my LGM-G600K using Tapatalk
ted presley said:
Yep, AFAIK, all camera sensors are round, while all pictures we got are in square shape. So, such wide pictures as 18:9, 16:9 are all cropped.
Sent from my LGM-G600K using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Camera sensors are not round, they are rectangular. The sensors native aspect ratio is what determines which aspect ratios are cropped.
uh60james said:
Camera sensors are not round, they are rectangular. The sensors native aspect ratio is what determines which aspect ratios are cropped.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry, I have explain what I mean in the wrong way.
As we know digital camera*takes light and focuses it via the len (which is round) onto a sensor, and yes, the image produces by the round len is round.
And when that round image projected on the rectangular sensor, we got the rectangular picture. Using a nearly square will get most of round image made by the len.
A more wide ratio picture (18:9 for example) with the same quality as 4:3 need 2 things: a bigger len (to have a bigger round image), a bigger sensor to crop the wide section => both increase the cost and most important need a bigger camera part.
Hope I have make my opinion​ clearer. Sorry for confusion I made.
Sent from my LGM-G600K using Tapatalk
I don't remember exactly but didn't the camera say something about this when you first started it? Or when you headed into the camera settings for the first time?
I seem to recall being reminded that using 4:3 would use the full sensor at least so that would help people who aren't in the know.
Obscure Reference said:
I don't remember exactly but didn't the camera say something about this when you first started it? Or when you headed into the camera settings for the first time?
I seem to recall being reminded that using 4:3 would use the full sensor at least so that would help people who aren't in the know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't pay attention at that time, but the default setting of my Korean version is 18:9.
Obscure Reference said:
I don't remember exactly but didn't the camera say something about this when you first started it? Or when you headed into the camera settings for the first time?
I seem to recall being reminded that using 4:3 would use the full sensor at least so that would help people who aren't in the know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it mentioned that so I changed to 4:3 immediately
Sent from my LG-H961N using Tapatalk
ted presley said:
I'm sorry, I have explain what I mean in the wrong way.
....
....
Hope I have make my opinion​ clearer. Sorry for confusion I made.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a great guy :good:
Why is 16:9 Ratio locked to 12MP? When the main camera is 16MP, 4:3 Aspect Ratio can go up to 16MP, so why can't 16:9? And could somebody possibly develop a mod to allow 16:9 to take full capability of the camera, I would try but I don't know how to, just a question I thought I'd ask, thanks in advance for replies
Joe199799 said:
Why is 16:9 Ratio locked to 12MP? When the main camera is 16MP, 4:3 Aspect Ratio can go up to 16MP, so why can't 16:9? And could somebody possibly develop a mod to allow 16:9 to take full capability of the camera, I would try but I don't know how to, just a question I thought I'd ask, thanks in advance for replies
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
16:9 just isn't a thing for 16MP. On any camera really. I'd try to explain it but I'm bad at explaining so I'll try to summarize (or at least how I like to think of it, someone can correct me). Think of megapixel as a large portion of a photo. When you have 12 it's basically 4 megapixels across and 3 megapixels tall, making 12. 16 just adds 4 more to the top or bottom row of the photo. So it's not a limitation of the phone, just of cameras in general.
Thisisabadname said:
16:9 just isn't a thing for 16MP. On any camera really. I'd try to explain it but I'm bad at explaining so I'll try to summarize (or at least how I like to think of it, someone can correct me). Think of megapixel as a large portion of a photo. When you have 12 it's basically 4 megapixels across and 3 megapixels tall, making 12. 16 just adds 4 more to the top or bottom row of the photo. So it's not a limitation of the phone, just of cameras in general.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 16:9 (12MP) Toggle comes enabled on the phone out of the box (at least I think it does) (and if not, the stock rom I'm using, the Creator might have switched it, but it's not mentioned anywhere else in his thread) and 4:3 (16MP) won't let a picture fill the screen completely, I know MP isn't everything when it comes to a camera, but it's just odd that it's a 16MP main sensor with it only using 12 of 16 out of the box, it's possible I'm not comprehending this and all the last phones I've had (GS6 and LG G5) Both have had camera mods that's gave them 60FPS recordings, improvements in general, and 100% JPG Quality, I appreciate your answer, and as I've said I might be just not grasping it or not understanding the reasoning behind it, just was digging around the stock camera app came upon the setting and thought I'd ask people that know more about this stuff then me. Thank you.
It's a hardware sensor limitation in the 16mp camera for the LG V20, and while you could get an app on the market that takes 16:9 pictures on the v20 by stretching the 4:3 picture to fit the ratio, I would just accept what we have ATM considering the alternative is kinda harmful to image fidelity
EDIT: Yes there is an option to switch to 16:9 with the drop to 12mp/6-mp depending on the options you choose obviously (just looked thanks to the post Joe199799 made just before mine)
This "degradation" in Megapixel count is actually fairly normal and happens in most cameras. My previous phone had a 13MP camera but recorded 9.7MP 16:9 shots. Here's a detailed explanation for why this happens:
If you think about how a camera works, light passes through the lens to hit the sensor. Making this lens round is the easiest option to make the image projected onto the sensor as close to reality without any distortion. Making the lens another shape would distort the image, ab bit like using the wide angle camera does, which is difficult to correct in post.
The lens projects a circular image, which you want to record as much of as possible. A circular sensor could capture everything, but circular content on rectangular screens doesn't make much sense.
The next shape that takes up the most area within a circle is a square. But at the time digital image sensors were developed, computer screens had adopted ratios of 4:3 or 3:2, slight deviations from the square.
As a result, image sensors were also built in 4:3 ratios, which sacrifice some, but not too much of the entire projected image. Now, with screen ratios favouring more width, we could adapt our sensors, however, to capture images of comparable quality, lenses would have to become larger or sensor electronics would need to shrink. Neither option is particularly preferable, which is why the 4:3 ratio has stuck around and most cameras recording 16:9 images simply crop out part of a 4:3 image. Because it arguably makes sense, megapixel count refers to the entire area of the image sensor. By cropping the image, the megapixel count will obviously decrease as a certain amount of pixels is deleted.
Alexsp32 said:
This "degradation" in Megapixel count is actually fairly normal and happens in most cameras. My previous phone had a 13MP camera but recorded 9.7MP 16:9 shots. Here's a detailed explanation for why this happens:
If you think about how a camera works, light passes through the lens to hit the sensor. Making this lens round is the easiest option to make the image projected onto the sensor as close to reality without any distortion. Making the lens another shape would distort the image, ab bit like using the wide angle camera does, which is difficult to correct in post.
The lens projects a circular image, which you want to record as much of as possible. A circular sensor could capture everything, but circular content on rectangular screens doesn't make much sense.
The next shape that takes up the most area within a circle is a square. But at the time digital image sensors were developed, computer screens had adopted ratios of 4:3 or 3:2, slight deviations from the square.
As a result, image sensors were also built in 4:3 ratios, which sacrifice some, but not too much of the entire projected image. Now, with screen ratios favouring more width, we could adapt our sensors, however, to capture images of comparable quality, lenses would have to become larger or sensor electronics would need to shrink. Neither option is particularly preferable, which is why the 4:3 ratio has stuck around and most cameras recording 16:9 images simply crop out part of a 4:3 image. Because it arguably makes sense, megapixel count refers to the entire area of the image sensor. By cropping the image, the megapixel count will obviously decrease as a certain amount of pixels is deleted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the explanation it's very through and fleshed out, I think I understand now