Related
Well, I just unpacked the G's stock /proc/config.gz kernel configuration and determined that the kernel is set for multicore.
Therefore, the rumor that the gtab is only using one core is wrong - at least from a kernel perspective. Does anyone have any information as to where this rumor got started?
Probably because all the benchmarks assume a single core, and thus people see results that don't make sense if you count 2 cores.
The major issue I have with the kernel right now is that everytime the G Tablet goes to sleep and wakes back up, it gets stuck at a ridiculously low clock speed and creates stuttering and slowness unless you use OverclockWidget to reset it. That's got to be a kernel-level issue.
That and the fact that the reading of the multitouch sensor is inherently stuttery and can't even read 2 touch points accurately for pinch and zoom some of the time (reminds me of the Nexus One in earlier software releases).
I think the general feeling is that the Android layer itself is not taking advantage of both cores. Or at least the apps themselves are not multi-threaded yet.
I'm thinking that this is similar to the days on early XP - that kernel was SMP aware OOTB, but if the applications weren't multthreaded, it didn't really offer much.
rcgabriel said:
The major issue I have with the kernel right now is that everytime the G Tablet goes to sleep and wakes back up, it gets stuck at a ridiculously low clock speed and creates stuttering and slowness unless you use OverclockWidget to reset it. That's got to be a kernel-level issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. The kernel's default governor is 'performance', so the kernel itself should be setting the clock to max. Maybe its not when it wakes up. Certainly something to look at....
roebeet said:
I think the general feeling is that the Android layer itself is not taking advantage of both cores. Or at least the apps themselves are not multi-threaded yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That may be, however, low-level stuff like flushing disk cache, handling wifi/bluetooth hardware events, etc., should be able to be pushed to the second core so that any processes on the first core wouldn't stutter. My experience has been that whenever wifi connects/disconnects, the whole tablet simply "freezes" until the wifi is fully connected. Sure is annoying in Angry Birds....
roebeet said:
I'm thinking that this is similar to the days on early XP - that kernel was SMP aware OOTB, but if the applications weren't multthreaded, it didn't really offer much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, kernel processes should be able to be rescheduled on the second core, so, yes, it should offer "more". Even if some of the programs running are single-threaded, having two cores should allow the processor to run two processes at the same time (even kernel processes that I alluded to earlier - flushing caches, handling wifi/bluetooth events, etc.). We should not be seeing "stalling" or "stuttering" much if at all. The only thing I can think of is that kernel support for the Tegra 2 is still immature.
rcgabriel said:
The major issue I have with the kernel right now is that everytime the G Tablet goes to sleep and wakes back up, it gets stuck at a ridiculously low clock speed and creates stuttering and slowness unless you use OverclockWidget to reset it. That's got to be a kernel-level issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting. The kernel's default governor is 'performance', so the kernel itself should be setting the clock to max. Maybe its not when it wakes up. Certainly something to look at....
roebeet said:
I think the general feeling is that the Android layer itself is not taking advantage of both cores. Or at least the apps themselves are not multi-threaded yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That may be, however, low-level stuff like flushing disk cache, handling wifi/bluetooth hardware events, etc., should be able to be pushed to the second core so that any processes on the first core wouldn't stutter. My experience has been that whenever wifi connects/disconnects, the whole tablet simply "freezes" until the wifi is fully connected. Sure is annoying in Angry Birds....
roebeet said:
I'm thinking that this is similar to the days on early XP - that kernel was SMP aware OOTB, but if the applications weren't multthreaded, it didn't really offer much.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, kernel processes should be able to be rescheduled on the second core, so, yes, it should offer "more". Even if some of the programs running are single-threaded, having two cores should allow the processor to run two processes at the same time (even kernel processes that I alluded to earlier - flushing caches, handling wifi/bluetooth events, etc.). We should not be seeing "stalling" or "stuttering" much if at all. One thing I can think of is that kernel support for the Tegra 2 is still immature. Another is that Viewsonic/Malata/Nvidia got something wrong in the hardware....
This could be incorrect, but:
http://www.taranfx.com/dual-core-tegra2-android-vs-iphone-4
and
http://www.androidcentral.com/nvidia-tells-us-why-we-want-dual-core-processors
I keep thinking (and hoping) that native support in the next version on Android might mean better overall performance. I guess we'll know in a few month's time.
roebeet said:
This could be incorrect, but:
http://www.taranfx.com/dual-core-tegra2-android-vs-iphone-4
and
http://www.androidcentral.com/nvidia-tells-us-why-we-want-dual-core-processors
I keep thinking (and hoping) that native support in the next version on Android might mean better overall performance. I guess we'll know in a few month's time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not going to give up on g-tablet and move to something else anytime soon are you?
jfholijr said:
You're not going to give up on g-tablet and move to something else anytime soon are you?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never say never.
In all seriousness, I'm pretty happy with my GTab. It does what I need it to do and probably the only thing that bugs me is the viewing angles, but not that much. The good outweighs the bad.
I am watching the Notion Ink news though, as that could solve the screen problems. But at $500, it might be out of my range - remember that I got my Gtab in the Outlet for $215.
roebeet said:
Never say never.
In all seriousness, I'm pretty happy with my GTab. It does what I need it to do and probably the only thing that bugs me is the viewing angles, but not that much. The good outweighs the bad.
I am watching the Notion Ink news though, as that could solve the screen problems. But at $500, it might be out of my range - remember that I got my Gtab in the Outlet for $215.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't leave us! haha
Aww I was one who thought this was true. I was hoping for a 5000 plus quadrant score haha. I'm satisfied with this tablet...for now. I'm definitely sticking with tegra devices. I won't get rid of this tablet until a tegra device with more RAM, a better screen, and maybe a faster processor.
i could just be wrong, but i was under the impression that froyo was to blame for not using multicore as it wasnt supported
and yet another reason why we were all waiting on gingerbread as it would utilize it
Well if this is true and it has multi core capabilities you would think new software should be on the way......
Yep, the stock/TnT kernel definitely uses both cores:
# cat /proc/cpuinfo
cat /proc/cpuinfo
Processor : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)
processor : 0
BogoMIPS : 1998.84
processor : 1
BogoMIPS : 1992.29
Features : swp half thumb fastmult vfp edsp vfpv3 vfpv3d16
CPU implementer : 0x41
CPU architecture: 7
CPU variant : 0x1
CPU part : 0xc09
CPU revision : 0
Hardware : NVIDIA Harmony Development System
Revision : 0000
Serial : 0000000000000000
#
The big question is, does froyo's dalvik VM support both or not. The OS natively is running utilizing both, but applications have to be optimized for multi-processor/core, particularly the Java virtual machine stuff in the proprietary Android stuff. Good question for one of the bigger dev's like Cyanogen; I'll see what I can find out. Either way, native support across the board for multi-core is definitely going to be a huge part of Android in the future, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was already written into GB (at least partially) and will be 100% by HC's release.
markgolly said:
Well, I just unpacked the G's stock /proc/config.gz kernel configuration and determined that the kernel is set for multicore.
Therefore, the rumor that the gtab is only using one core is wrong - at least from a kernel perspective. Does anyone have any information as to where this rumor got started?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. You can also see this in the logfiles, e.g. kernel ring buffer via dmesg and see that it does bring up both cores which is further supported by a bogomips val that corresponds to 2 x 1GHz a9s.
As other have mentioned it is the layers ABOVE the kernel that don't seem to be fully threaded or enough to really take advantage of multiple CPUs... i.e. Android "OS" layer & apps...
Oddly enough even though I am keeping the gTab I still haven't really dug through /proc on this one much yet. It was the first or second thing that I did with the GT & WPDN along with examining the kernel ring buffer...
Hi
I´m kind of new here but still haven´t found an answer why my Nexus only shows 1097 RAM instad of 2000? Even tried different hardware checker and they all tell me the same. Have I made I bad flash?
Davidkallen said:
Hi
I´m kind of new here but still haven´t found an answer why my Nexus only shows 1097 RAM instad of 2000? Even tried different hardware checker and they all tell me the same. Have I made I bad flash?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 2GB ram on the device must accommodate both the operating system and graphics Ram before any apps are loaded. So what you see is normal. This is no different for laptops. Also the 16 or 32 GB internal storage shows less after formatting and Android OS plus Google apps (Gapps) are installed. At least with the Nexus 10 you have much less bloatware compared to other Tablets (eg. Samsung).
Sent from my Nexus 10 using XDA Premium HD app
3DSammy said:
The 2GB ram on the device must accommodate both the operating system and graphics Ram before any apps are loaded. So what you see is normal. This is no different for laptops. Also the 16 or 32 GB internal storage shows less after formatting and Android OS plus Google apps (Gapps) are installed. At least with the Nexus 10 you have much less bloatware compared to other Tablets (eg. Samsung).
Sent from my Nexus 10 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for you answer 3Dsammy.
I understand that you use RAM when things are installed, But I still dont get it. When I was on stock it showed in settings 2 gb RAM. And now Hardware info (app) System RAM 1097?. Same with Clean sweeper.
Davidkallen said:
I understand that you use RAM when things are installed, But I still dont get it. When I was on stock it showed in settings 2 gb RAM. And now Hardware info (app) System RAM 1097?. Same with Clean sweeper.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus 10 has never shown 2gb available, I've had it since launch and I believe the most I've ever seen was back on 4.2 was about 1400MB or so, and it has gone down from there on each update. You never get what they advertise on the box, every single one of my devices has less than whats advertised, my Note 3 is supposed to have 3gb available, but really its only 2.38 after its said and done..
1098 is normal on 4.4.2 for N10, I've attached a shot from mine ... I can only assume most of it is being reserved for the GPU and its super high resolution.
** These threads might have more information you are looking for.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2377356
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2463178
Hi,
As already stated here, just clearing a little the information for you .
The Nexus 10 has a huge screen resolution, therefore it requires a more powerful GPU, even having a pretty powerful graphic processors which is the MALI, it's not powerful enough for the 1600p screen, so they allocated ≈1GB to the graphic unit to prevent any possible issues.
Also, there are some apps running in background, so it takes some RAM too.
Hope this clarifies a little ,
~Lord
"All I Ever Needed Was A Little Piece of Hope" - World of Fantasy (Helloween)
Sent from my monstrous Xperia Z1
Thank for your help:good:
I did notice that with slim kat 4.2.2 I have 1647 ram available and with 4.4.2 slim kat I had 1099.
so I thought that Kit Kat uses less RAM but I don't really see it with those comparisons.
Joe
First time when I've ordered Moto X Play (XT1562) with 16 GB of internal storage, it did show 11 GB of available storage. However, due to display defect, I had to return it and get an replacement which has 10.89 GB of available storage.
I've received the replacement before sending the actual defective one. I've tried to check what's different, but I couldn't find anything else except for storage availability difference. Both were Lollipop 5.1.1 with identical kernel and firmware version (both were "reteu" and single SIM). As I didn't know about accessing recovery mode before returning the defective one, I don't know was there any difference in recovery information.
Performance seems to be identical, both were still causing identical lags. Even after upgrading to marshmallow with my current replacement, it's still stuttering while scrolling. It still doesn't feel fully optimized.
I didn't post this before as I thought that this wasn't a big deal, but I want to know what was the difference between storage availability. Does anyone have Moto X Play with 11 GB of available storage? I saw some people having 10.89 GB, but no one having 11 GB. Please check size of your available internal memory storage and give some details if possible. Along with that, vote if you have 16 GB model (If you have 32 GB, don't vote for other value).
What happened to 0.11 GB of storage? Is it anyhow possible to get it back?
Well, mine does have exactly 11GB. Dunno what's the actual reason.
I'd imagine it's the same as anything, all chips are made to a certain spec and not all are bang on. They have tolerances, some maybe 11 and others maybe 10.89 and some may even 11.10 or something. It's the same with CPUs, not all chips are identical I the same range. This is why we CPUs can be over clocked much further than another CPU that is the same model number.
If after a few days you don't see a noticeable performance difference, I'd suggest performing a factory reset. If it still persists, I would send the pone back. Mine went from noticeable lag to occasional stutter (fairly rare, just could be equated to background tasks running).
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using Tapatalk
Mine shows 11.
differences between regions? single, dual sim? just my guess
brian10161 said:
I'd imagine it's the same as anything, all chips are made to a certain spec and not all are bang on. They have tolerances, some maybe 11 and others maybe 10.89 and some may even 11.10 or something. It's the same with CPUs, not all chips are identical I the same range. This is why we CPUs can be over clocked much further than another CPU that is the same model number.
If after a few days you don't see a noticeable performance difference, I'd suggest performing a factory reset. If it still persists, I would send the pone back. Mine went from noticeable lag to occasional stutter (fairly rare, just could be equated to background tasks running).
Sent from my Moto G 2014 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not the same as CPUs.
If you have two same phone models with same CPUs with advertised clock speed at 1 GHz for example, and then you notice that they underclocked it at 800MHz on one phone due to possible instability with higher clock, wouldn't that be unfair?
You can't just sell something advertised with higher specifications and then sell it with lower specifications.
On contrary, if the manufacturer manages to get higher clock on some CPUs, they would sell those as different model with higher advertised clock speed. The example for that would be MSM7227 (600MHz) and MSM7227-1 Turbo (800MHz, same as MSM7227, but works with higher clocks). Some models only use the first one, while other ones use the second one. Two different phone models can have different CPUs, but two same phone models cannot.
It's still 11 and 10.89 GB. No one mentioned anything more or less yet.
You're suggesting something that I didn't ask for. I don't need help with my phone. I need help with finding out what is causing this and is there anything possible to do something with it.
pijes said:
differences between regions? single, dual sim? just my guess
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've already said there was no difference between both phones I had. Same region, both had only single sim slot.
Further note:
I've decided to check with file explorer to see actual partition sizes:
/data: 10.89 GB
/system: 2.57 GB
/cache: 0.73 GB
Total: ~14.19 GB
In case that others have 11 GB of /data, then that would be ~14.3 GB in total for them.
If you can, check /system and /cache partition sizes to see if you get in total about 14.3 GB.
Okay. I'm sorry to have responded and tried to help you out. If you think that I don't know what I'm talking about then I'd say you are obviously qualified to figure this out your self. I wasn't trying to be rude, just trying to explain that there are tolerances in ICs that are followed. They have gotten a lot better than when CPUs were first being built, I understand that. But there are still tolerances. I very rarely see two Memory ICs with the EXACT same storage size. There are sections of the disk used for error correction that we don't even see in the storage size.
If you are unhappy with my response, that's cool. I won't be responding anymore.
Take care.
Sent from my Moto X Play
brian10161 said:
Okay. I'm sorry to have responded and tried to help you out. If you think that I don't know what I'm talking about then I'd say you are obviously qualified to figure this out your self. I wasn't trying to be rude, just trying to explain that there are tolerances in ICs that are followed. They have gotten a lot better than when CPUs were first being built, I understand that. But there are still tolerances. I very rarely see two Memory ICs with the EXACT same storage size. There are sections of the disk used for error correction that we don't even see in the storage size.
If you are unhappy with my response, that's cool. I won't be responding anymore.
Take care.
Sent from my Moto X Play
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You did make better answer now, though. I'm quite stubborn about some issues like this one. Thanks for further details about it.
Just seen that.
They advertise the compact as a 2GB RAM device, knowing that they only deliver 1,8 GB.
Anyone else seen that before?
I do not think it s a way to free up to full 2GB as advertised?
Other brands deliver 2GB if they tell their devices have, why not so z5 compact?
punkrockfan said:
Just seen that.
They advertise the compact as a 2GB RAM device, knowing that they only deliver 1,8 GB.
Anyone else seen that before?
I do not think it s a way to free up to full 2GB as advertised?
Other brands deliver 2GB if they tell their devices have, why not so z5 compact?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where's the source on what you're talking about? The RAM is always going to be used up by something - the OS, launcher, etc. You're not going to turn the phone on and have exactly 2GB of RAM available.
Sure, but it says 1,4 out of 1,8 used, 3xx free.
That means Limit is 1,8 as shown under Memory, not 2 as advertised. Never noticed that on a phone before.
As soon as the device is running memory is used, but it should say out of 2,0 not 1,8?
@punkrockfan
you're a little late to the party
http://www.disk-space-guide.com/size-units.aspx
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabyte
https://blogs.gnome.org/cneumair/2008/09/30/1-kb-1024-bytes-no-1-kb-1000-bytes/
http://superuser.com/questions/287375/what-is-the-origin-of-k-1024
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_binary_prefixes
Also - not sure why you'd want to specifically blame Sony for this
Coming from the technical, developer background:
you have to consider that device drivers also eat up quite some memory/storage (best example: the Galaxy S, GT-i9000: 512 MB advertised, at best 300 [384 at best] available)
it's only the device drivers, it's the kernel (system) itself that also needs memory
so you'd basically have to advertise e.g. 2 GB but plug in 3 or even 4 GB to have full access for e.g. apps
All companies define a gigabyte to be 1000MB, and a megabyte to be 1000kb, etc etc. In reality it's 1024KB per MB, and 1024MB per GB.
You never fully get 2GB, just check your computer eg. your hardrive might be 1tb big, but in reality its only somewhat over 900gb? 16gb ram might only be 15.9 gb!
Well, nice, not sure since when vienna is germany?
punkrockfan said:
Well, nice, not sure since when vienna is germany?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
derailing the topic like a pro
Home Country vs. Service Provider vs. City
you'd know that if you had taken a look at your own profile
(I moved back some time ago)
Thanks for the notice though
The topic is...that in Windows the full RAM without any convertings of bits and bytes is shown.
Only Hard Disks have that "exchange" from 2TB to 1,8 e.g.
So I was not awaiting that on mobile RAM too.
Really ?
I gotta take a look next time I booted into Windows,
Android sort of is Unix, Linux - so that is more to be expected
yep
BIOS: 3096MB a 4GB Bar
Windows too
But I got an explanation somewhere else as smartphones use flash memorys equal to SSDs so its the same 1000 isnt 1024...thing there )
punkrockfan said:
yep
BIOS: 3096MB a 4GB Bar
Windows too
But I got an explanation somewhere else as smartphones use flash memorys equal to SSDs so its the same 1000 isnt 1024...thing there )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3096MB ?
that looks more like a 32bit OS limitation though
punkrockfan said:
yep
BIOS: 3096MB a 4GB Bar
Windows too
But I got an explanation somewhere else as smartphones use flash memorys equal to SSDs so its the same 1000 isnt 1024...thing there )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plus, on android some ram is reserved by GPU. Unlike dedicated graphic card on PC/Mac which got their owned ram but our GPU shared with system memory.
Same thing as onboard GPU on desktop systems so?
Well 3096 per slot, using several 4GB bars, no 32 bit limitation)
Hey, here are the specs of my current desktop. I bought it back in June 2018, and since only added more ram and an HDD, also most of my peripherals.
Specs :
CPU : Intel i5 8400
CPU cooler : Be quiet, I don't know what exactly
RAM : 16 GB Dual-Channel "DDR4 Ballistix" @ 1366MHz --> 2 at 2400MHz and 2 at 2666MHz each 4096 MB
Motherboard: ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING
GPU : 3071 MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (EVGA)
Storage : - 232 GB Samsung SSD 860 EVO 250 GB (SATA (SSD))
- 931 GB Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 (SATA)
- 931 GB Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 (SATA)
Power supply : I don't know, but I remember it being good 500-650W, 80+Gold, I think.
I want it to be better, any ideas on what should I update first ?
Noe367 said:
Hey, here are the specs of my current desktop. I bought it back in June 2018, and since only added more ram and an HDD, also most of my peripherals.
Specs :
CPU : Intel i5 8400
CPU cooler : Be quiet, I don't know what exactly
RAM : 16 GB Dual-Channel "DDR4 Ballistix" @ 1366MHz --> 2 at 2400MHz and 2 at 2666MHz each 4096 MB
Motherboard: ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING
GPU : 3071 MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (EVGA)
Storage : - 232 GB Samsung SSD 860 EVO 250 GB (SATA (SSD))
- 931 GB Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 (SATA)
- 931 GB Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 (SATA)
Power supply : I don't know, but I remember it being good 500-650W, 80+Gold, I think.
I want it to be better, any ideas on what should I update first ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not a bad system in any way! The question is, in which application should your PC be better? A game? Video rendering?
And What is your resulution of your monitor(s) where your GTX1060 has to deal with?
strongst said:
That's not a bad system in any way! The question is, in which application should your PC be better? A game? Video rendering?
And What is your resulution of your monitor(s) where your GTX1060 has to deal with?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mostly play game, but also use a lot of cpu in others programs, so the CPU is often at 100% because of the types of games and multitasking, the GPU is also often overused, but it can be changed by reducing in game graphics but a bit annoying. Also, I have two monitors, one 2560*1440 @ 144Hz and the other is 1920*1080 @ 75Hz. I know right now GPU are a bit expensive, but if I want to change CPU I will most probably have to change the motherboard too.
Noe367 said:
I mostly play game, but also use a lot of cpu in others programs, so the CPU is often at 100% because of the types of games and multitasking, the GPU is also often overused, but it can be changed by reducing in game graphics but a bit annoying. Also, I have two monitors, one 2560*1440 @ 144Hz and the other is 1920*1080 @ 75Hz. I know right now GPU are a bit expensive, but if I want to change CPU I will most probably have to change the motherboard too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, the 1060 can't handle >1080p gaming at 144hz good, that's the main part you should update. You can check my Ryzen build here where I'm using similar resolutions for the monitors.
The 3060ti might be a good choice. I don't talk about the current prices at all, you know...
You can update to an i9-9900k which is ~30% faster than yours. But your processor isn't that bad, it might be more the lot of multiple tasks where you should think about more cores (10/16) in general
If you have more available bandwidth and ports consider adding more drives for the OS.
Depending on the Intel firmware there may be some interesting Raid options.
Explore your page file/drive options as well.
Just make sure to clone the OS drive for easy restore, clone before installing antivirus apps.
Keep the data off the OS drive, just apps.
Never clone data drives; copy only! Cloning media files can cause you to lose needed null marks.
strongst said:
Yeah, the 1060 can't handle >1080p gaming at 144hz good, that's the main part you should update. You can check my Ryzen build here where I'm using similar resolutions for the monitors.
The 3060ti might be a good choice. I don't talk about the current prices at all, you know...
You can update to an i9-9900k which is ~30% faster than yours. But your processor isn't that bad, it might be more the lot of multiple tasks where you should think about more cores (10/16) in general
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot ! Very useful
blackhawk said:
If you have more available bandwidth and ports consider adding more drives for the OS.
Depending on the Intel firmware there may be some interesting Raid options.
Explore your page file/drive options as well.
Just make sure to clone the OS drive for easy restore, clone before installing antivirus apps.
Keep the data off the OS drive, just apps.
Never clone data drives; copy only! Cloning media files can cause you to lose needed null marks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I might buy a .m2 drive
Noe367 said:
I might buy a .m2 drive
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I not up to date at all on the new mobos and drives... I run dinosaurs
ID your bottlenecks.
Research it thoroughly, even then it will be by trial and error.
Playing with the page file (maybe adding another fast dedicated drive) may yield good results with minimal expense/effort.
blackhawk said:
I not up to date at all on the new mobos and drives... I run dinosaurs
ID your bottlenecks.
Research it thoroughly, even then it will be by trial and error.
Playing with the page file (maybe adding another fast dedicated drive) may yield good results with minimal expense/effort.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, thanks !!
Noe367 said:
I mostly play game, but also use a lot of cpu in others programs, so the CPU is often at 100% because of the types of games and multitasking, the GPU is also often overused, but it can be changed by reducing in game graphics but a bit annoying. Also, I have two monitors, one 2560*1440 @ 144Hz and the other is 1920*1080 @ 75Hz. I know right now GPU are a bit expensive, but if I want to change CPU I will most probably have to change the motherboard too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go for a mobo with all solid state caps and preferably no electrolytics which invariably fail with age.
Gigabyte has been making all solid state mobos for over a dozen years.
blackhawk said:
Go for a mobo with all solid state caps and preferably no electrolytics which invariably fail with age.
Gigabyte has been making all solid state mobos for over a dozen years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Again, thank you, very helpful
Noe367 said:
Again, thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome.
Don't skip on the power supply*. Get the best you can find. A failed supply can be a real pain to troubleshoot.
Make sure it's minimum rated output supports your devices on that rail. Probably not an issue but be aware of it.
Most importantly make sure you have lots of head room on all the supply rails especially the lower voltage ones. Leave room for expansion.
Overrate by at least 20% of expected maximum surge demand for all rails.
Look closely at build quality. Does it look well built using epoxy PCBs and heavy wires?
A clean, neat layout?
Quality fans and excellent ventilation that conform to your case layout/venting needs?
Enough direct outputs to minimize preferably eliminate daisy chaining?
Long enough for the mobo and graphics card?
Note the exit point for cables, do they integrate well with your case design/layout?
Fun times
*a good case is a joy to work with and helps to protect your investment.
blackhawk said:
You're welcome.
Don't skip on the power supply*. Get the best you can find. A failed supply can be a real pain to troubleshoot.
Make sure it's minimum rated output supports your devices on that rail. Probably not an issue but be aware of it.
Most importantly make sure you have lots of head room on all the supply rails especially the lower voltage ones. Leave room for expansion.
Overrate by at least 20% of expected maximum surge demand for all rails.
Look closely at build quality. Does it look well built using epoxy PCBs and heavy wires?
A clean, neat layout?
Quality fans and excellent ventilation that conform to your case layout/venting needs?
Enough direct outputs to minimize preferably eliminate daisy chaining?
Long enough for the mobo and graphics card?
Note the exit point for cables, do they integrate well with your case design/layout?
Fun times
*a good case is a joy to work with and helps to protect your investment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awesome !
This beast or similar. The power supply goes on the bottom.
Amazon.com: Antec P101 Silent Performance Series Mid-Tower PC Computer Case with Sound Dampening Panels, 4 X 120/140mm Cooling Fans Pre-Installed : Everything Else
Buy Antec P101 Silent Performance Series Mid-Tower PC Computer Case with Sound Dampening Panels, 4 X 120/140mm Cooling Fans Pre-Installed: Everything Else - Amazon.com ✓ FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases
www.amazon.com
First of all, I don't want to offend anybody that has commented their suggestions already, but in my opinion most of the replies are pretty lackluster to say the least.
Now, I saw you mentioned that you mostly play games on your PC. I'd say your CPU is still perfectly fine for most modem games, the GPU is another story though. While the standard 1060 is still a decent card, your version only has 3 GB of VRAM. This is becoming more and more of a problem in modern titles and you should consider upgrading, I'd say at least to a 6 GB 1060. Of course, the current market is awful and you shouldn't spend too much money on that old of a GPU, but if you can find one at a decent price, it might be worth a buy.
Other than that, your system is pretty well specced out in my opinion, you might want to sort out that RAM situation and get a matching kit of DDR4 at a decent clock speed, your description seems a bit all over the place in that regard. 16 GB of RAM is still perfectly fine, I wouldn't recommend a capacity upgrade, but matching sticks with matching speeds can do wonders.
Furthermore, I'd consider a bigger SSD, but your current storage configuration should provide enough space and as long as the OS is located on the SSD performance shouldn't be too bad either.
Finally, whatever you do, getting a 9900k, like somebody suggested, is a bad idea in my opinion. If you don't want to do any serious overclocking or have to do **very** CPU-intensive tasks, your 8400 should still hold up well. If you go for a 9900k you might as well build a new system because you're probably gonna need a new motherboard, CPU Cooler and definitely a GPU upgrade so the 9900k doesn't have to live in bottleneck hell. Incase you absolutely want to upgrade the CPU, I'd say go for an i7 of the 8th generation, as you'll be able to expect better performance than from your i5 thanks to multithreading while not having to upgrade any others parts mentioned above.
So, to conclude: You should upgrade your GPU. Go for something like the 6 GB 1060 or better. Search around on the internet for GPUs that work well with your processor. Maybe get some matching RAM. If you still have money to spend, a bigger SSD might make everything a bit snappier. I wouldn't consider upgrading the CPU.
And, a last final note: Make sure you don't exceed your PSU's wattage, definitely check before buying any upgrades.
littlegamer757 said:
First of all, I don't want to offend anybody that has commented their suggestions already, but in my opinion most of the replies are pretty lackluster to say the least.
Now, I saw you mentioned that you mostly play games on your PC. I'd say your CPU is still perfectly fine for most modem games, the GPU is another story though. While the standard 1060 is still a decent card, your version only has 3 GB of VRAM. This is becoming more and more of a problem in modern titles and you should consider upgrading, I'd say at least to a 6 GB 1060. Of course, the current market is awful and you shouldn't spend too much money on that old of a GPU, but if you can find one at a decent price, it might be worth a buy.
Other than that, your system is pretty well specced out in my opinion, you might want to sort out that RAM situation and get a matching kit of DDR4 at a decent clock speed, your description seems a bit all over the place in that regard. 16 GB of RAM is still perfectly fine, I wouldn't recommend a capacity upgrade, but matching sticks with matching speeds can do wonders.
Furthermore, I'd consider a bigger SSD, but your current storage configuration should provide enough space and as long as the OS is located on the SSD performance shouldn't be too bad either.
Finally, whatever you do, getting a 9900k, like somebody suggested, is a bad idea in my opinion. If you don't want to do any serious overclocking or have to do **very** CPU-intensive tasks, your 8400 should still hold up well. If you go for a 9900k you might as well build a new system because you're probably gonna need a new motherboard, CPU Cooler and definitely a GPU upgrade so the 9900k doesn't have to live in bottleneck hell. Incase you absolutely want to upgrade the CPU, I'd say go for an i7 of the 8th generation, as you'll be able to expect better performance than from your i5 thanks to multithreading while not having to upgrade any others parts mentioned above.
So, to conclude: You should upgrade your GPU. Go for something like the 6 GB 1060 or better. Search around on the internet for GPUs that work well with your processor. Maybe get some matching RAM. If you still have money to spend, a bigger SSD might make everything a bit snappier. I wouldn't consider upgrading the CPU.
And, a last final note: Make sure you don't exceed your PSU's wattage, definitely check before buying any upgrades.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, now I have the choice and many opinions to make my own choice
blackhawk said:
This beast or similar. The power supply goes on the bottom.
Amazon.com: Antec P101 Silent Performance Series Mid-Tower PC Computer Case with Sound Dampening Panels, 4 X 120/140mm Cooling Fans Pre-Installed : Everything Else
Buy Antec P101 Silent Performance Series Mid-Tower PC Computer Case with Sound Dampening Panels, 4 X 120/140mm Cooling Fans Pre-Installed: Everything Else - Amazon.com ✓ FREE DELIVERY possible on eligible purchases
www.amazon.com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have an In Win, this is fine for me, for the moment. Will also see that !
Noe367 said:
I have an In Win, this is fine for me, for the moment. Will also see that !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a real clean layout. Power harnesses run behind a steel inner panel for better shielding, out of sight and out of the way.
Plenty of cooling with the ability to expand cooling if needed. It's solid and heavy.
Antec cases come with a parts manifest as well.
blackhawk said:
It's a real clean layout. Power harnesses run behind a steel inner panel for better shielding, out of sight and out of the way.
Plenty of cooling with the ability to expand cooling if needed. It's solid and heavy.
Antec cases come with a parts manifest as well.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh cool, will look into that when needed !
Noe367 said:
Hey, here are the specs of my current desktop. I bought it back in June 2018, and since only added more ram and an HDD, also most of my peripherals.
Specs :
CPU : Intel i5 8400
CPU cooler : Be quiet, I don't know what exactly
RAM : 16 GB Dual-Channel "DDR4 Ballistix" @ 1366MHz --> 2 at 2400MHz and 2 at 2666MHz each 4096 MB
Motherboard: ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING
GPU : 3071 MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB (EVGA)
Storage : - 232 GB Samsung SSD 860 EVO 250 GB (SATA (SSD))
- 931 GB Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 (SATA)
- 931 GB Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP102 (SATA)
Power supply : I don't know, but I remember it being good 500-650W, 80+Gold, I think.
I want it to be better, any ideas on what should I update first ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gaming wise, GPU should be a priority
multi-tasking wise, buy the newest intel gen 10 or 11 also you can opt for AMD
Core i5 11th gen is a wise option
ryzen 5 3600 still good too
you'll need cpu and motherboard too