Hi,
i have strange problems using GCM service over xmpp
i just use the sample code provided bei Google here:
developer.android.com/google/gcm/ccs.html#implement
sometimes this code works fine, and i get the notification on my device
but sometime i just run into a SASLError:
Code:
SASL authentication PLAIN failed: text:
the cause for this error is, that Google GCM server returned an error:
Code:
text
which is unknown in the smack SASLError enum.
so first i don't know what the root cause is.
when i run this code in a loop, i can see that for n request in a row i receive this error, then after some time, the error is gone and messages are send.
again after some time, i receive the error again.
couldn't explain why,
could it be that there are some Google Servers not working properly ?
when i use the test url:
Code:
gcm-preprod.googleapis.com:5236
at least i don't get the SASLError, instead i just get not-authorized.
but the behavior is the same, n requests works n next requests doesn't
did someone have any idea why this happens ? or having the same problems ?
thanks a lot
This is the XDA home of UBER Toolchains.
What is UBERTC?
A bleeding edge toolchain based on latest gnu.org changes and patched with aosp and linaro android patches for optimal performance/battery.
Links
Prebuilts: https://bitbucket.org/matthewdalex/
Source: https://github.com/UBERTC
Communities: UBER Development - https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/112152563785863538123
DarkRoom Development - https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/117685307734094084120
Bug Reports/Support
Bug reports and support will be offered on this thread, Github and the Google+ communities in the links section.
Credits
AOSP
Google
Linaro
Cl3Kener
XDA:DevDB Information
UBER Toolchains, Tool/Utility for all devices (see above for details)
Contributors
mdalexca, Cl3Kener
Source Code: https://github.com/UBERTC
Version Information
Status: Stable
Created 2016-12-29
Last Updated 2017-06-17
Great toolchain! Good job, man.
Kindly update the link to pre-builts.
Edit:
Thanks.
@DespairFactor
Hi,
I synced these three chains from your repo today morning and the build was fine,
aarch64-linux-android-4.9, arm-eabi-4.9, arm-linux-androideabi-4.9
however repo synced again few hours back and build is failing every time with this error.
http://pastebin.com/JF1hZAm1
While syncing one commit was truncated for each toolchain.
Can you suggest what's the issue? Thanks.
nicesoni_ash said:
@DespairFactor
Hi,
I synced these three chains from your repo today morning and the build was fine,
aarch64-linux-android-4.9, arm-eabi-4.9, arm-linux-androideabi-4.9
however repo synced again few hours back and build is failing every time with this error.
http://pastebin.com/JF1hZAm1
While syncing one commit was truncated for each toolchain.
Can you suggest what's the issue? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a clang error, not a gcc error. It it segfaulting which is usually something related to memory.
The Flash said:
That's a clang error, not a gcc error. It it segfaulting which is usually something related to memory.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could this commit be a reason for this issue as I read that clang related optimizations may done that, although it's for UberTC and I build using it just today morning.
https://github.com/ashoksoni/android_build/commit/74358aa6c5892f5aed0b16e9833c3a0c4588264f
Sent from my "1+2" powered by Unofficial RR 7.x.x
Compiled by myself
Edit :
I somehow removed my last post mistakenly.
nicesoni_ash said:
Could this commit be a reason for this issue as I read that clang related optimizations may done that, although it's for UberTC and I build using it just today morning.
https://github.com/ashoksoni/android_build/commit/74358aa6c5892f5aed0b16e9833c3a0c4588264f
Sent from my "1+2" powered by Unofficial RR 7.x.x
Compiled by myself
Edit :
I somehow removed my last post mistakenly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isn't likely because those need to be enabled via boardconfig, which clang are you using?
DespairFactor said:
It isn't likely because those need to be enabled via boardconfig, which clang are you using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't make any changes to my BoardConfig.mk. This is the link.
https://github.com/ashoksoni/android_device_oneplus_oneplus2/blob/cm-14.1/BoardConfig.mk
This looks like the toolchain issue as one other user reported me the same issue. I am using the default toolchain now with same setup except ubertc optimizations and the build is going fine.
Could this be because of this commit?
https://github.com/UBERTC/GCC-UBER/commit/c09770237a5f4443b4328fef8b73636dc07aff41
Coz I only started having this issue after this commit.
Thanks.
nicesoni_ash said:
This looks like the toolchain issue as one other user reported me the same issue. I am using the default toolchain now with same setup except ubertc optimizations and the build is going fine.
Could this be because of this commit?
https://github.com/UBERTC/GCC-UBER/commit/c09770237a5f4443b4328fef8b73636dc07aff41
Coz I only started having this issue after this commit.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That commit has been in there for ages. You probably are missing a commit in bionic or build to supplement the opts.
The Flash said:
That commit has been in there for ages. You probably are missing a commit in bionic or build to supplement the opts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, but I only use pre-built ones from DespairFactor's repo. Build is working fine on default tc.
Sent from my "1+2" powered by Unofficial RR 7.x.x
Compiled by myself
nicesoni_ash said:
Oh, but I only use pre-built ones from DespairFactor's repo. Build is working fine on default tc.
Sent from my "1+2" powered by Unofficial RR 7.x.x
Compiled by myself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So let me get this straight: the latest toolchains without any additional commits like the Uber opts you posted fail to compile? GCC didn't change at all, if anything were to break it, it would be binutils.
The Flash said:
So let me get this straight: the latest toolchains without any additional commits like the Uber opts you posted fail to compile? GCC didn't change at all, if anything were to break it, it would be binutils.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right, the pm I got from other user is also reporting the same thing that when he build using binutils 2.5, the error was gone but then the kernel wasn't bootable for him. But since it's clear, do you think now the pre-builts can be build with different binutils?
Sent from my "1+2" powered by Unofficial RR 7.x.x
Compiled by myself
nicesoni_ash said:
You are right, the pm I got from other user is also reporting the same thing that when he build using binutils 2.5, the error was gone but then the kernel wasn't bootable for him. But since it's clear, do you think now the pre-builts can be build with different binutils?
Sent from my "1+2" powered by Unofficial RR 7.x.x
Compiled by myself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always compile the toolchains yourself, you sync it down just like a ROM and build it with the scripts in the UBERTC organization.
I have a question, is there anything I can do to get the kernel to boot with 7.x?
Boots just fine with 6.x toolchain, but when compiled with 7.x, just stays on the splash screen
The device is Sprint Samsung Galaxy S3, running RR-N
Lonelyskatter12 said:
I have a question, is there anything I can do to get the kernel to boot with 7.x?
Boots just fine with 6.x toolchain, but when compiled with 7.x, just stays on the splash screen
The device is Sprint Samsung Galaxy S3, running RR-N
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
7.x is still in development from GNU, this happened with 6.x when it was in the same state. I suggest waiting until it's official release ,it will likely work at that time.
hello,
just wondering if anyone can assist w/the following error message generated while compiling LOS-13 for OnePlus3 w/UberTC 4.9
build is configured w/the original UBER optimizations...
i've swapped out the physical memory & increased cache from 50-GB to 80-GB
Code:
/tmp/abort_message-19a0bf.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/abort_message-19a0bf.s:510: Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections
clang++: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
build/core/binary.mk:950: recipe for target '/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/abort_message.o' failed
make: *** [/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/abort_message.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
target thumb C++: libc++abi_32 <= external/libcxxabi/src/cxa_default_handlers.cpp
/tmp/cxa_aux_runtime-ba7b1a.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cxa_aux_runtime-ba7b1a.s:1008: Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections
clang++: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
build/core/binary.mk:950: recipe for target '/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_aux_runtime.o' failed
make: *** [/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_aux_runtime.o] Error 1
/tmp/cxa_default_handlers-c025bc.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cxa_default_handlers-c025bc.s:2706: Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections
clang++: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
build/core/binary.mk:950: recipe for target '/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_default_handlers.o' failed
make: *** [/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_default_handlers.o] Error 1
make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
laperry1 said:
hello,
just wondering if anyone can assist w/the following error message generated while compiling LOS-13 for OnePlus3 w/UberTC 4.9
build is configured w/the original UBER optimizations...
i've swapped out the physical memory & increased cache from 50-GB to 80-GB
Code:
/tmp/abort_message-19a0bf.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/abort_message-19a0bf.s:510: Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections
clang++: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
build/core/binary.mk:950: recipe for target '/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/abort_message.o' failed
make: *** [/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/abort_message.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
target thumb C++: libc++abi_32 <= external/libcxxabi/src/cxa_default_handlers.cpp
/tmp/cxa_aux_runtime-ba7b1a.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cxa_aux_runtime-ba7b1a.s:1008: Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections
clang++: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
build/core/binary.mk:950: recipe for target '/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_aux_runtime.o' failed
make: *** [/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_aux_runtime.o] Error 1
/tmp/cxa_default_handlers-c025bc.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cxa_default_handlers-c025bc.s:2706: Error: inconsistent uses of .cfi_sections
clang++: error: assembler command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
build/core/binary.mk:950: recipe for target '/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_default_handlers.o' failed
make: *** [/home/samadhi/los13/out/target/product/oneplus3/obj_arm/STATIC_LIBRARIES/libc++abi_intermediates/src/cxa_default_handlers.o] Error 1
make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not related to GCC, those are related to the clang toolchain.
thanks for your reply, it only fails w/UBERTC. w/default TC's it compiles fine...
DespairFactor said:
That is not related to GCC, those are related to the clang toolchain.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
laperry1 said:
thanks for your reply, it only fails w/UBERTC. w/default TC's it compiles fine...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is the exact toolchain name you are using? Can you give more output too?
While trying to compile LineageOS 13.0 for the Nexus I'm stuck with the following error:
/home/android/android/system/out/host/linux-x86/bin/checkpolicy: loading policy configuration from /home/android/android/system/out/target/product/grouper/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/policy.conf
device/asus/grouper/sepolicy/init_shell.te:2:ERROR 'unknown type init_shell' at token ';' on line 14035:
allow init_shell sysfs_firmware_writable:file { open append write };
#line 1 "device/asus/grouper/sepolicy/init_shell.te"
checkpolicy: error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
external/sepolicy/Android.mk:85: recipe for target '/home/android/android/system/out/target/product/grouper/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy' failed
make: *** [/home/android/android/system/out/target/product/grouper/obj/ETC/sepolicy_intermediates/sepolicy] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
target thumb C++: init <= system/core/init/keychords.cpp
make: *** wait: No child processes. Stop.
Anyone being able to tell me how to get rid of that?
The type init_shell is not defined, i.e. your sepolicy configuration of the device tree does not match to the ROM sources. Probably the best way is to remove those definfitions temporaryly and to build the ROM in permissive mode. Later you can restrict / adapt the permissions to your needs.
Sooo... after some time I got back to this little project.
What I have achieved so far is that LineageOS 13.0 does build for grouper. However, when trying to boot it always starts back in recovery.
What I have done starting from stock LineageOS code for grouper is correcting "tvdpi" to "hdpi" like in 14.1 (https://github.com/LineageOS/androi...mmit/7dd33b8eb8c13b682202405e48c6d7962d5a73d7), and referring the build process to the correct kernel config, which is not "lineageos_android_defconfig" but "lineageos_grouper_defconfig". Then I have tried to substitute the apparently incorrect sepolicy definitions by those of GtrCraft (https://github.com/GtrCraft/cyanogenmod_grouper).
The result can't be too bad, because it actually builds. However, since it is not starting up I'm kinda stuck here again. Anyone being able to provide a hint why this is so or how to diagnose it?
And just for the obvious question: I believe that 14.1 is too much for grouper, although there is a somehow official build. And also, Xposed does not work officially yet on 14.1 (and does not anymore on 11.0). Therefore I would really like to upgrade to 13.0.
Still no luck, compile is finishing without errors, ROM will not boot, but throws me back to recovery. Maybe someone can take a look into the ROM:
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/ts4x8unxshb2z9n,tyv3j58t82z56a8/shared
So I made a TWRP device tree for it using twrpdtgen by SebaUbuntu and I’m doing the repo sync of the twrp minimal manifest but I haven’t really built TWRP for a device before. The device tree is android_device_mbox_dolphinp1 but I will also try to make it obvious that that device is also the Easytone… etc so it is easy to find and I will make XDA post when it is fully complete. The main thing I need to do now is double check all the stuff in the build tree and any settings I want TWRP to have in boardconfig.mk and compile and test it. I own this device so if all goes well it could be at least booting by the end of the week. Is there anyone with TWRP building experience that would be willing to help if I make any stupid mistakes? The end goal is to make an official TWRP build on the TWRP website. This year I may also consider looking into ROM development just because I really love tinkering with this device and I would love to see it running a custom ROM with the Android TV controls and features in mind. I also want to help anyone who bought this device and was disappointed by the stock experience, which can be slow and clunky to say the least.
I am trying to do lunch but I get this error please help
~/dolphinp1-twrp/device/mbox/dolphin-p1$ lunch twrp-dolphin-p1
In file included from build/make/core/config.mk:313:
In file included from build/make/core/envsetup.mk:312:
device/mbox/dolphin-p1/AndroidProducts.mk:11: error: device/mbox/dolphin-p1: twrp_dolphin-p1-user: Invalid variant: p1.
16:28:41 dumpvars failed with: exit status 1
Device twrp not found. Attempting to retrieve device repository from TeamWin Github (http://github.com/TeamWin).
Found repository: android_device_emulator_twrp
Checking branch info
Calculated revision: android-12.1
Branch android-12.1 not found
In file included from build/make/core/config.mk:313:
In file included from build/make/core/envsetup.mk:312:
device/mbox/dolphin-p1/AndroidProducts.mk:11: error: device/mbox/dolphin-p1: twrp_dolphin-p1-user: Invalid variant: p1.
16:28:47 dumpvars failed with: exit status 1
build/make/core/version_defaults.mk:56: warning: Invalid TARGET_PLATFORM_VERSION 'p1', must be one of
In file included from build/make/core/config.mk:313:
In file included from build/make/core/envsetup.mk:68:
build/make/core/version_defaults.mk:57: error: SP2A.
16:28:48 dumpvars failed with: exit status 1
** Don't have a product spec for: 'twrp'
** Do you have the right repo manifest?