Hi guys, could you tell me how to open file for writing in the phone app LocalStorage for the non-unlocked handset (regular app for store)?
Code below doesn't work
Code:
FILE *tmp;
auto tmpPath = Windows::Storage::ApplicationData::Current->LocalFolder->Path + "\\tmp.txt";
auto tmpErr = _wfopen_s(&tmp, tmpPath->Data(), L"w");
Any suggestions?
Try looking though msdn articles. I found it somewhere in there. But I have forgotten it now.
Sent from Board Express on my Nokia Lumia 1020. Best phone ever!!
Note to noobs: DON'T PM ME WITH QUESTIONS. POST IN THE FORUMS. THAT'S WHAT THEY ARE HERE FOR!
@wcomhelp, please keep your rtfm advices for yourself, OK? I'm not a noob and of course I've searched msdn, google, codeplex, github etc. and so on before posting here. If you don't know how, much better be silent (like others who read this post but have no idea what I'm talking about)
I've tried a few possible methods including ugly "MS-way" with task & lambda syntax (see below) but nothing worked as it should be (code below works if no file exist and fails if file already exist - CreationCollisionOption::ReplaceExisting options is not worked/not implemented/buggy/billgates_knows_only ).
Code:
auto folder = Windows::Storage::ApplicationData::Current->LocalFolder;
Concurrency::task<Windows::Storage::StorageFile^> createFileOp(
folder->CreateFileAsync(CONFIG_FILE_NAME, Windows::Storage::CreationCollisionOption::ReplaceExisting));
createFileOp.then([=](Windows::Storage::StorageFile^ file)
{
return file->OpenAsync(Windows::Storage::FileAccessMode::ReadWrite);
})
.then([=](Windows::Storage::Streams::IRandomAccessStream^ stream)
{
auto outputStream = stream->GetOutputStreamAt(0);
auto dataWriter = ref new Windows::Storage::Streams::DataWriter(outputStream);
// data save code skipped
return dataWriter->StoreAsync();
})
.wait();
BTW, I've used workaround, to save ported C++ app data to the LocalSettings instead of text file (as it was in original code).
"Doesn't work" doesn't give us a lot to go on, troubleshooting-wise. Can you tell us what error you get?
Only thing I see in the code that looks a little weird is that the
Code:
"\\tmp.txt"
part isn't explicitly a wide-character string, but I'd expect string concatenation to take care of that.
Also, out of curiosity, why libc functions instead of Win32? Obviously, the code you're writing here isn't intended for much portability...
@GoodDayToDie, there is no error code at all - standard POSIX functions returns NULL FILE, the ::GetLastError() also return 0.
I'm porting old C-style app to WinRT platform and don't care about portability (but the first post code - just a simplified example, nothing more).
POSIX (libc) functions works pretty well for reading only but not for writing - that's the problem...
As I said before, I resolved my issue by workaround but still curious why the POSIX calls fails for file writing in the app storage.
buuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh
No need for lambdas
https://paoloseverini.wordpress.com/2014/04/22/async-await-in-c/
You may also want to rethink your strategy
You can't create files at arbitrary locations, so your method is kinda redundant. All the locations you are allowed to create and read files to/from are available through KnowFolders and ApplicationData classes. These return StorageFolders which in turn can create files with CreateFileAsync (used for both creating and opening existing files) and get files with GetFilesAsync ( I recommend against this one though) and similar methods.
@mcosmin222, could you please re-read my posts one more time? I'm not trying to create files at "arbitrary locations"; I wanna create/write simple text file at the app's local storage (which one should be available for reading/writing). And the problem not in the lambdas or task usage (yes, it looks ugly but it works as it supposed to be).
Could you provide a working example instead of words? And I'll be glad to say you "thanks a lot"; can't say now...
sensboston said:
@mcosmin222, could you please re-read my posts one more time? I'm not trying to create files at "arbitrary locations"; I wanna create/write simple text file at the app's local storage (which one should be available for reading/writing). And the main problem not in the task (async execution).
Could you provide a working example instead of words? And I'll be glad to say you "thanks a lot"; can't say now...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, just gimmie a few hours till I can get near a compiler that is capable of doing that
Of course, no rush at all, take your time. It's not a showstopper for me now (actually, my workaround with AppSettings is more preferable way - at least for universal app and roaming settings) but the issue still has an "academic interest" and maybe will be useful in the next projects for porting old C/C++ code to WinRT.
sensboston said:
Of course, no rush at all, take your time. It's not a showstopper for me now (actually, my workaround with AppSettings is more preferable way - at least for universal app and roaming settings) but the issue still has an "academic interest" and maybe will be useful in the next projects for porting old C/C++ code to WinRT.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi
in vs 2015
#include <pplawait.h>
Something of the like should work
Code:
WriteSomeFile() __resumable
{
auto local = ApplicationData::Current->LocalFolder;
auto file = __await local->CreateFileAsync("some file", CreationCollisionOption::eek:penIfExists);
__await FileIO::WriteTextAsync(file, "this is some text");
}
However, as of right now, in VS 2015 RC, you have a host of limitations when dealing with this, but I do not believe this will be of any issue to you.
Code:
Cannot use Windows Runtime (WinRT) types in the signature of resumable function and resumable function cannot be a member function in a WinRT class. (This is fixed, but didn't make it in time for RC release)
We may give a wrong diagnostic if return statement appears in resumable function prior to seeing an await expression or yield statement. (Workaround: restructure your code so that the first return happens after yield or await)
Compiling code with resumable functions may result in compilation errors or bad codegen if compiled with /ZI flag (Edit and Continue debugging)
Parameters of a resumable function may not be visible while debugging
Please see this link for additional details
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2015/04/29/more-about-resumable-functions-in-c.aspx
you should also note that this works with native, standard C++ types.
@mcosmin222, looks like unbuffered writing works (i.e. without streams) fine but it still not an answer for my initial question
I'm curious why the standard POSIX libc writing operations are not working on the app's local storage (but reading from files works fine). Actually, it's all about porting old C/C++ code for WinRT; of course for the new app it's not a problem but re-writing old code to FileIO should be a huge pain in the ass. What I did: I've "mechanically" changed all libc formatted outputs from file to string, and use LocalSettings class (actually it's XML file) to store that string (I'm planning also change LocalSettings to RoamingSettings, to provide settings consistency between WP & desktop app).
P.S. <pplawait.h> is not available in my VS 2015 (release pro version) so I've tested by using lambda pattern.
OK, first things first, LIBC != POSIX! The POSIX way to do this would be to call the open() function and get back an int as an "fd" (file descriptor), which is of course not implemented on Windows Phone because Windows Phone is not a POSIX platform (you might find the Windows compatibility functions _open() and _wopen(), but I doubt it). You are attempting to use the standard C library functions, which are portable but implement kind of a lowest common denominator of functionality and are generally slightly slower than native APIs because they go through a portability wrapper.
Second, sorry to be all RTFM on you but you should really Read The Manual (or manpage, or, since this is Windows, the MSDN page)! Libc APIs set errno (include errno.h) and use different error values than Windows system error codes (or HRESULT codes, or NTSTATUS codes, or...). Error reporting in C is a mess. If you were calling CreateFile(), you would check GetLastError(), but since you're calling _wfopen(), you check errno (not a function).
@GoodDayToDie, _wfopen_s returns 0 (i.e. "no error") but tmp pointer receives also 0 (NULL) Could you explain why libc file functions are working for reading (at the app installation & local data folders of course) but not for writing? Any logical ("msdn based") explanation? Or you just... don't know, heh?
sensboston said:
@GoodDayToDie, _wfopen_s returns 0 (i.e. "no error") but tmp pointer receives also 0 (NULL) Could you explain why libc file functions are working for reading (at the app installation & local data folders of course) but not for writing? Any logical ("msdn based") explanation? Or you just... don't know, heh?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LIBC functions will most likely work just in debug mode. The moment you try to publish the app it will fail. You can do lots of crazy stuff on your developer device with basic C functions, but if you try publishing, it won't pass the marketplace verification.
Most C APIs are simply not supported, since they do not comply with the sandbox environment of the Windows Runtime.
The code I gave you is tested with VS 2015 RC. You should be able to include <pplawait.h> just fine, if you are targeting toolchains newer than November 2013.
mcosmin222 said:
The moment you try to publish the app it will fail. You can do lots of crazy stuff on your developer device with basic C functions, but if you try publishing, it won't pass the marketplace verification.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm... Are you sure or it's just your assumption? My app is still under development but (just for test!) I've made store app package for WP and it passed local store verification I also uploaded package to the store (via browser) and it also passed. I don't have time to create all tiles and fill all fields to complete beta-submission (actually, I don't know how to mark app as beta in the new dashboard) but for me it looks like app don't have any problem and will pass store certification easily. And you may be sure - it uses A LOT of libc calls 'cause originally it was written for Linux (or kind of UX system)
sensboston said:
Hmm... Are you sure or it's just your assumption? My app is still under development but (just for test!) I've made store app package for WP and it passed local store verification I also uploaded package to the store (via browser) and it also passed. I don't have time to create all tiles and fill all fields to complete beta-submission (actually, I don't know how to mark app as beta in the new dashboard) but for me it looks like app don't have any problem and will pass store certification easily. And you may be sure - it uses A LOT of libc calls 'cause originally it was written for Linux (or kind of UX system)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once usage reports get up to microsoft, you will be given a notice to fix the offending API (happened to be once). You are much better off using the platform specific tools: not only they are much faster, they are also much safer and you won't have problems later on.
You might get away with reading stuff (since reading is not that harmful), but you should be using the winRT APIs each time they are available.
Simply uploading your app to the marketplace just reruns the local tests in their cloud servers: once you submit the actual app (not beta, not tests) for consumers, it will be much more aggressively checked. This is because the store allows specific scenarios for distributing apps in close circles that may break the usual validation rules.
@mcosmin222, one more time: is it your assumptions or personal experience? I don't know how many apps you have in store (I do have a lot) but I never heard that you said. I've used C++ libraries with WP hacks in some of published apps but never had any problem with "aggressive checks". What I know: if you are using some "prohibited" calls, your app will not pass uploading to the store (uploading, not a certification).
P.S. I'll send you personally a link when I publish release Hope, you'll like it
sensboston said:
@mcosmin222, one more time: is it your assumptions or personal experience? I don't know how many apps you have in store (I do have a lot) but I never heard that you said. I've used C++ libraries with WP hacks in some of published apps but never had any problem with "aggressive checks". What I know: if you are using some "prohibited" calls, your app will not pass uploading to the store (uploading, not a certification).
P.S. I'll send you personally a link when I publish release Hope, you'll like it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By "hacking" you mean recompiling the code to fit the windows phone toolchain? if so, then you shouldn't have to worry about too many things.
but even so, calling stuff like fopen in locations other than local storage will get your app banned. Even if it makes past the first publication, you can get noticed weeks later or even months (yes, it did happen to me personally).
In most cases, calling C APIs that can potentially break the sandbox (like opening a file in doc library with fopen) will always fail the marketplace verification, eventually. If it hasn't happened to you yet, then you may have not been using such APIs.
No, my C++ code is not accessing other than approved locations but the app has a lot of libс (and of course other C/C++ libs) calls; I'm 99.9% sure it's legitimate and will be not a source of any problem. Otherwise what is the advantages of having C++ compiler?!
As far as I know, just some of API's are prohibited but you will notice it right after local store compatibility test run...
As for "hacks" I mean usage of undocumented ShellChromeAPI calls (including loading hack).
P.S. I've found why <pplawait.h> header is missing. Initially I've created solution with the 12.0 toolset but now I can't (or don't know how to) change it to 14. However creating the new empty universal solution in VS 2015 also gives me toolset 12 by default. What is the toolset 14 for? Windows 10?
sensboston said:
No, my C++ code is not accessing other than approved locations but the app has a lot of libс (and of course other C/C++ libs) calls; I'm 99.9% sure it's legitimate and will be not a source of any problem. Otherwise what is the advantages of having C++ compiler?!
As far as I know, just some of API's are prohibited but you will notice it right after local store compatibility test run...
As for "hacks" I mean usage of undocumented ShellChromeAPI calls (including loading hack).
P.S. I've found why <pplawait.h> header is missing. Initially I've created solution with the 12.0 toolset but now I can't (or don't know how to) change it to 14. However creating the new empty universal solution in VS 2015 also gives me toolset 12 by default. What is the toolset 14 for? Windows 10?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The advantage of C++ is the obvious versatility: the standard C++ APIs will work fine for you as long as you stay inside the sandbox (this means you can't access files even in locations that are outside of sandbox but you have permission to them, such as music library). You can use most classic C/C++ libraries without issues as long as you do the interface with the runtime broker yourself. That means using windows runtime APIs instead of classic C APIs when dealing with stuff such as file access, for example. This is a pretty extensive topic and It is rather difficult to explain it all with 100% accuracy, especially when there is lots of docs running around.
You also get deterministic memory management, which is huge in specific scenarios.
Long story short
You will be fine with standard C/C++ when using
any in-memory functions supported by the compiler (you can manipulate data types, string, mutex, etc).
File IO in isolated storage only (applicationData folder)
Threads (although you are better off using threadpool or the like, it is much easier and cleaner). You can also use futures, and std::this_thread.
You will have to use winRT replacement
File system access in any other location than application data (you must use the windows::storage APIs)
sockets, internet access and the like.
any hardware related thing: music&video playerback must be interfaced through winRT (although the underlying decoders can be classic C/C++), messing around with the device sensors.
Retrieving system properties (internet connection state etc)
cross process communications
communicating with other apps
There are also win32 equivalents
mutex, threading, fileIO (isolated storage only)
Media playback with custom rendering pipeline.
Basically, winRT functions as an abstraction layer between the hardware and your code. You can use classic C++ up to the point where you need to interact with the system in any way. At that point, system interaction must be done with winRT. This way, microsoft ensures a higher degree of stability and security for devices.
check this link out for more information on the toolchains. You should be able to use this in VS 2013 as well with windows 8 (this is a compiler feature, has nothing to do with supported platform)
https://paoloseverini.wordpress.com/2014/04/22/async-await-in-c/
Related
Hi all,
I'm new to Android development, kind of a Java noob, but not to programming in general. I'm not looking for code examples, just theory or a basic 'how this is done' in Java/Android. I also hope this will become useful information for other developers heading down this path.
I've had some success creating my first Android app - I apologize for not going into details about the specifics of the app, as I plan to eventually sell it commercially on the market - the question should, however, be applicable to any application using this flow model.
My current goal for this application is to create a 'plugin' type system ( like those used in OpenHome and other apps that allow user-generated plugin-able content / functionality ), to allow for flexibility in both my own further component development, as well as eventually creating an open interface for other developers to use to extend the application.
Currently my application is laid out as follows:
Main UI class
- entry point to the application
- starts the service class to spawn 'spinners' ( data processors )
- presents the user with an (ideally) extendable interface to the service
- binds to the service class using AIDL
Service class
- presents an AIDL interface for communication from the UI process
- creates 'spinners' of various types based on user interaction that process data
- persistent, will run in background, new Main UI instances will connect to the running service and present the currently running spinners.
- extendable via an as-yet-unimplemented plugin interface to add new types of spinners
Spinner classes
- use a generic interface with a handfull of common methods to communicate with the Service class, bubbling up data to the UI interface.
- processes user defined data streams, outputs to a buffer/sink suppled by the Service
Assumptions I can make are:
- the plugin (Spinner) class will always implement / override a group of methods to present to the Service class; ie 'putData()', 'getStatus()', 'start()' and 'exit()'
- the plugin class should always return data to the Service class via a supplied/shared buffer ( short array, for example )
Where I'm stuck at the moment is exactly how to implement extendable classes without those classes being a part of the current code base package. More simply, how do I interface with these classes without knowing their names, methods, etc?
As mentioned, I'm new to Java so I may just be overlooking an already implemented class that handles this interaction. If that is the case, I'd be happy for anyone to tell me to shut up and read the docs, if you can point me at the proper docs
What I really don't want to do is create a 'plugin language' for these external bits, as I feel this could hamper development of fast/functional plugins vs. those written as native Java classes. This would also expose potential security issues, as I'd need to create a public interface to the Service class for these applications to link to. I'd prefer if execution of the plugins remained private / internal to the 'main' application.
I'm already using an AIDL interface between the UI class and the Service class - it would potentially be possible to use further AIDL interfaces into each plugin, but from my romp-through-the-park implementing the UI -> Server communication in this way, I find it cumbersome and difficult to pass any kind of complex data sets/controls. And I'm still unsure how the Service class would actually implement these without inheriting the interface directly.
I've poked around Intents in Android, but I'm having trouble wrapping my head around them/what they're for - it seems it might be possible to inherit the plugins that define themselves as sinks for my applications specific Intent type, but I'm lost in the details of how this works exactly, or if it would even be a viable path for what I'm trying to do. Can new Intents even be introduced into Android?
I apologize for the long-winded explanation of what boils down to a simple question:
How can I implement a 'plugin' interface in my application to allow myself and other developers to extend my app through their own classes?
I've been a Java developer for 10 years or so.
From what I understand the "Android" way, would be intents. I'm still working on wrapping my brain around them too.
However, the "Java" way would be to define an interface (or several) for the plug-in(s) to implement. Then use reflection to identify classes in the classpath that implement that interface.
There are some advanced techniques using custom class-loaders, but researching reflection should get you started; if you choose to go that route.
Thanks for the quick response, I'll take a look at the reflection implementation.
Intents do seem to be the 'way to go' for inter-application communication in Android the more I read about it though - if I can figure out how to pull in plugins which specify my applications 'Intent' dynamically. Intents seem to work really well for spawning a 'dumb instance' of an application - like the browser when clicking a link in another app - when your application doesn't want to deal with that data locally.
Seems a bit more difficult to wrap them around a bi-directional interface between the service and the external plugin application. If anyone's got experience with this kind of thing I'd definitely appreciate prodding in the right direction. Documentation on Intents is confusing at best.
Hi there, i'm new to developing Android Apps, so i have some questions.
1. I know that always have a chance of breaking security on computer world
2. Whats the most secure method to generate a UniqueID? because my app needs to work on china tablets, original tablets, cellphones, hacked phones, etc. I need this for verification of paid things (wait, xda will have a free version ;o)
3. There is any way to encript the program without affecting the performance too much? I'm new to java and comming from C++, so there is any compaction, encrypt, etc? Because if anybody knows the NEW IDA will come with android support.
4. There is any HTML parser on java? Because i need to fetch a html page with httpclient and after i need to parse it to get content... the contect is dynamic (html table with N rows), so i need a parser... or there is any other way?
5. I know how to make a tabed interface, but how is the best way to know the app state? Like it:
App Start -> User Already Logged (Save on SQLite?) ?
Yes = Display app interface and unlock config menu (here is the tabed interface)
No = Display login interface and lock config menu (here is just a relative layout with login bnts)
Thanks in advance.
1: Number one is not a question.
2: Do you mean most secure possible, or most secure practical? Those concerns should be addressed. Most secure would be to have a courier bring the user one-time-pads for every session, but that's not very practical. That said, what is the nature of your ID? Depending on what you are using it for, I would think a few randomly generated bits from some user entered entropy (like touchpad event timing) should suffice.
3: Again, what is the nature of your need for encryption? Do you want to keep it from being decompiled and analysed? If so, you're pretty much out of luck as there is always a way for a dedicated hacker to disassemble the code that does the decryption unless you use some sort of challenge-handshaking algorithm to load the keys at runtime for every session from some secure source but that requires connectivity and user interaction which necessarily complicates the process.
4: The XML parsers available as part of the Android SDK do a pretty good job of parsing HTML if it is clean compliant HTM> See, i.e. the Sax classes:
http://developer.android.com/reference/org/xml/sax/package-summary.html
5: You can use the API included preference classes to save state between sessions:
http://developer.android.com/reference/android/preference/package-summary.html
Note: for general application cryptography information, you still can't beat the venerated Applied Cryptography by Bruce Schneier.
Thanks for the answers.
I just wanna know how the most used programs like rom manager, power amp, titanium backup and whatsapp protect their paid versions, and how they validate it.
Another question that leaves on it is that some programs have a dedicated paid version, and some have just a key that you download and unlock the free version, how they did it? They just check if key is installed assuming that it was downloaded from market?
My uses is just for two reasons:
1.) protect my app as possible from newbie crackers
2.) transmit user information with a secure method to my server. Its important because my app will be used on open networks.
As for UniqueID generating, i just wanna a "unique world global super id" for each user of my app, and it will be installed on cellphones, tablets without phone, tv with android, and all of this.
Also, what to do if html is not well formated?
Hi,
I'm interested to know which debugging/logging tools are available.
I'd like to get more information about the processes at startup, and specially logs of the CPU usage by each application over a period of time.
I've been searching for some time and the only I've found are the old Htc Test applications, but can't get what I want.
Noted that HTC devices have a builtin debug tool (debuglog.dll). Anyone knows how to use it?
Also found the following the following post describing the HTCDiagDriver and the possibility to analyze the device using QUALCOMM eXtensible Diagnostic Monitor.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=12624471&postcount=2
Anyone uses it?
Global debuglog can be enabled via DebugTool.exe (available in Htc Test Applications). It depends on debuglog.dll, yeah. Read manual, it works quite well.
Then, if you want to get log for selected app, launch it via IDA.
Also we have CeLog available, I will post needed launchers soon. I can hardly call it useful as we have retail/ship SYS builds. The only useful purpose for us is page faults chart.
EDIT: CeLog attached.
Some of the builds come with the Perfman package. That s.o.b. will really slow down your device, though, and it creates a massive log file, which I could never find the tools to analyze. I think celog does it, though, which is pretty sweet.
The htc debugger works better. You just change one of the debug flags and reset, and the device starts writing the log file. It doesn't slow down the device nearly as much as perfman. I think celog may work on that log file, too. You can royally eff up your device with that tool, though, if you mess with the radio flags. It's pretty cool how it writes to flash memory. Too bad you can't change other things with it like the page pool size.
ultrashot said:
Also we have CeLog available, I will post needed launchers soon. I can hardly call it useful as we have retail/ship SYS builds. The only useful purpose for us is page faults chart.
EDIT: CeLog attached.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been playing with the tool on my Tornado and observed the following (usage related):
Use it while the device is disconnected from PC. The overhead of repllog.exe (connected to ActiveSync on XP PC) and syncing is just filling your log. For my installation (no further MS Mobile development tools on the PC) kerneltracker.exe does not connect to the device anyway.
Though obvious, the files CeLog*.exe have to run on the device, so copy them to a convenient place there.
The CeLogAttach.exe seems to start the kernel logging and it slows down the device (kind of obvious). There is no way to stop this logging. Something like CeLogDetach would be needed, if it exists, to restore the state before CeLogAttach.exe was run.
The CeLogFlush.exe will flush the existing log but also immediately start the logging again.
The CeLogStopFlush.exe does just what the name tells - it stops the flush to file of the (still ongoing) logging.
After transfering the celog.clg file (from \Release\ directory of the device) it can be opened in kerneltracker.exe. Then you see all the kernelactivities logged and aligned per process/thread on a zoom-able timeline (10ms - 10s) including the labels of the logged primitives. With event filtering you can sort out what you are not interested in. Here you may need advice on what to look after when you want to hunt down a certain device behaviour.
I have checked for page-faults, Virtual Memory related actions (Allocate, Copy, Free) and also Module actions (load, free) to get a clue if and how modules and paging (or better said: the use of the Page-Pool) is correlated. Nothing eye-striking coming up here, but it may just be for the unknowing observer like myself.
@ultrashot: I could not find anything I would call a "page faults chart" - where is that - or what is that?
Looking further: If I change certain device properties (like increase the pagepool or playing with OSB advanced options) I fear that the logged information here is just far too detailed for a useful compare. For that you would have to create identical conditions for the action under scrutiny - something that cannot be done with a disconnected device.
So I have to admit that all objective compare of such tuning and tweaking is far above my head and I just have to join the many that make more or less clever assumptions trusting on their model of actions in their heads. I hope that the better knowing heads continue to spread their wisdom without only telling RTFM or guide with LMGTFY (which can help if the results really point to right places).
tobbbie said:
@ultrashot: I could not find anything I would call a "page faults chart" - where is that - or what is that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use Event filter->Miscellaneous->Page fault.
I am not too advanced user of this tool. If we had builds with extra celog instrumentation, we could have take much more from this tool. However, there are some articles in the internets about celog, so anyone who wants to be get more info may just try to google it. I don't want
ultrashot said:
Use Event filter->Miscellaneous->Page fault.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is what I did already when telling about the items I cared below. Page faults are however part of generic virtual memory management and they do also apply for any normal loaded executables. As you know I seek for traces of module related paging and the use of the page-pool.
So it will stay with the trial and error and side-by-side compare with two devices having different settings. Not a big thing doing that...
Some interesting articles on MSDN regarding the paging pool (aka "pagepool"):
Kernel Blog article explaining the fundamentals (highly recommended): http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ce_base/archive/2008/01/19/paging-and-the-windows-ce-paging-pool.aspx
Pagepool Variable explained and simple methods to measure impact: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa451041.aspx
-> this is what kitchentools are patching in the kernel
Then some more backup on virtual memory - just to complete on that:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ce_base/archive/2006/10/30/what-is-virtual-memory.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/hegenderfer/archive/2007/08/31/slaying-the-virtual-memory-monster.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/hegenderfer...aying-the-virtual-memory-monster-part-ii.aspx
And to get back to the debug tools topic of this thread, linked form the first article an introduction to the Remote Kernel Tracker to explain what you can actually see there (and why you cannot see certain things as we have shipped ROM builds and not profiling builds to deal with): http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sloh/archive/2005/05/17/introduction-to-remote-kernel-tracker.aspx
Great insight if you want to get a glimpse of how Windows CE operates under the hood.
...reading a little deeper in the MSDN articles, Sue Loh mentions there when talking about the paging pool size determination:
The best tool I know is that readlog.exe will print you a page fault report if you turn on the “verbose” and “summary” options. If you get multiple faults on the same pages, your pool may be too small (you may also be unloading and re-loading the same module, ejecting its pages from memory, so look for module load events in the log too). If you don’t get many repeats, your pool may be bigger than you need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To avoid dealing with a full setup of the Mobile Development toolsets, could any one (ultrashot - you have been so helpful - could you??) post that mentioned "readlog" tool? If there is something like "CeLogDetach.exe", please add it too.
BTW: you may notice that the paging pool is a central part of the Windows CE memory management when it comes to running executable code from "memory mapped files" (as Sue Loh calls them). In my understanding these are simply what we know as "modules".
A lot of tweaking strategies go around that when building ROMs with OSBuilder. There are several ways how to avoid or optimize the use of the paging pool for certain or all modules in OSB. I think these options deserve an own thread and I am not sure if the one OSB thread we have should be cluttered with discussing this.
don't have any of those.
This thread is for announcements and discussion around the WP8NativeAccess project (https://wp8nativeaccess.codeplex.com/). The purpose of this project is to provide general-purpose libraries, usable from C++ or .NET, which enable access to the underlying functions of the OS. In some cases, this will mean simple wrappers around native APIs; in other cases, these will be more advanced operations which simplify using the low-level APIs.
Some of the functions that the Native Access project exposes are already available via the official APIs. Other functions, however, are not. While I have no objection to these libraries being used in Store apps (license permitting), it is unlikely that Microsoft will permit the ones which use unofficial APIs.
Note that this library does not provide any method for elevation of privileges. Consequently, the use of these APIs will be constrained by the sandbox in which all third-party WP8 apps run, as defined by the capabilities in the app manifest. In practical terms, this means that most of the system will be either inaccessible or read-only. Even so, it has already proven useful to myself. When combined with interop-unlock and Capability-unlock hacks (making it possible for apps to obtain higher privileges), these APIs become much more useful. In fact, the EnableAllCapabilities utility uses the Registry library. Similarly, if you have the ability to use restricted Capabilities in an app you are developing, you may find these libraries useful.
The libraries are as follows:
FileSystem version 0.4.0: Implements functionality to read, write, and get information about files and directories, plus supports creating symbolic links and enumerating file system volumes. This version contains a breaking change from 0.3.x: the NativeFileSystem functions are now static and the constructor is removed. This library may be built with or without the macro USE_NON_PUBLIC_APIS; by default it now includes this macro and require kernelbase.lib to build. If this macro is not defined, it builds using the public APIs without requiring any special libraries.
Registry version 0.2.9: Implements functionality to read and write registry values, and to create and delete registry keys and values. Many, though not yet all, registry value types are fully supported. This library consists entirely of non-public (for WP8) APIs and requires the KERNELBASE.LIB and ADVAPI32LEGACY.LIB export libraries for Windows Phone 8 in order to build (the DLLs are in C:\Windows\System32 on the phone; you can use Dll2Lib.exe to extract the .LIB files).
Processes version 0.1.0: Implements basic functionality to get information about your process, and to create or kill a child process. Very early version.
They are licensed under the Microsoft Permissive License.
The FileSystem and Registry libraries are currently being used by my WP8 File Access Webserver project (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2355034).
My EnableAllSideloading app uses the Registry library (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2435697).
@hjc4869 has a basic FileExplorer app which uses the FileSystem library (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2497788).
You may need to use 7-Zip or another extraction program better than the built-in Windows Zip extractor to open the archive.
Reserved for OP...
Updated. This will be the main place on XDA for releases of the NativeAccess libraries going forward. Additionally, please report problems or make feature requests here.
I think there should be some way to list all the volumes...
Perhaps windows runtime has provided an async win32 file API wrapper which has the same ability as win32 ones ,so I think undocumented file API and registry ,process and etc are more important.
The latest version of the NativeFileSystem library can give you the mount points (as strings) for all volumes (C:\, D:\, etc.)... I implemented that a few days ago; it should be in this update. Sorry for not highlighting that more clearly (typo in the OP fixed now).
Can't open "NativeAccessLibraries_040_029_010.zip"
Edit Ok with 7-zip
How odd, you're right. I didn't do anything terribly fancy while building that ZIP, so I really don't know what's up with that.
I have added the NativeFileSystem library to my PDF to Office app...
Thanks again for all your work !
@GoodDayToDie: Congratulations, good work! Unfortunately I can't import the registry library, it says it's not a valid DLL. I have Visual Studio 2013 Pro. Does it work for WP8? Please help me solving the problem. Thanks!
Sent from my Windows Phone using Tapatalk
myst02 said:
@GoodDayToDie: Congratulations, good work! Unfortunately I can't import the registry library, it says it's not a valid DLL. I have Visual Studio 2013 Pro. Does it work for WP8? Please help me solving the problem. Thanks!
Sent from my Windows Phone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need to reference .winmd file, not the .dll file.
Thanks! Can we also modify hex registry values with it?
Sent from my Windows Phone using Tapatalk
If you have the required permissions, yes. There's read/write functions for REG_BINARY, and also a simple wrapper around RegSetValue that will work for any type.
However, the library doesn't actually give you any privileges your app didn't already have. Without special Capabilities (which usually require hacks to enable), you won't have write access anywhere in the registry at all...
GoodDayToDie said:
If you have the required permissions, yes. There's read/write functions for REG_BINARY, and also a simple wrapper around RegSetValue that will work for any type.
However, the library doesn't actually give you any privileges your app didn't already have. Without special Capabilities (which usually require hacks to enable), you won't have write access anywhere in the registry at all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, thanks, but another question: I referenced .winmd file, but it gives me error, the component was not found. Any idea how to fix it?
Do you have the DLL and the WINMD in the same location? Are you creating a WP8.0 app (I don't know if apps targeting 8.1 specifically will work)? Are you building for ARM?
Yeah, I have. Library now working, but it doesn't recognize the commands, I mean if I write NativeRegistry.ReadDWORD command not found :/ Can you help me?
Sent from my RM-915_lta_lta_330 using Tapatalk
You're going to need to be way more specific.
How far did you get, i.e. can you compile the app? Install the app? Launch the app? Does it crash immediately or does it actually load? Etc.
What, *exactly*, breaks? Does it break when you try to reference the NativeRegistry library, or only when you try to actually use ReadDWORD function, or some time later? If you are able to call readDWORD, what is the return value? If it fails, what is the error code?
Are you getting an exception, or does it just not work? If it's an exception, give me as much detail about it as you can (the type, the message, the code where it happened, etc. if possible).
myst02 said:
Yeah, I have. Library now working, but it doesn't recognize the commands, I mean if I write NativeRegistry.ReadDWORD command not found :/ Can you help me?
Sent from my RM-915_lta_lta_330 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to rebuild the solution.
GoodDayToDie said:
You're going to need to be way more specific.
How far did you get, i.e. can you compile the app? Install the app? Launch the app? Does it crash immediately or does it actually load? Etc.
What, *exactly*, breaks? Does it break when you try to reference the NativeRegistry library, or only when you try to actually use ReadDWORD function, or some time later? If you are able to call readDWORD, what is the return value? If it fails, what is the error code?
Are you getting an exception, or does it just not work? If it's an exception, give me as much detail about it as you can (the type, the message, the code where it happened, etc. if possible).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I can't even build it, it doesn't recognize the command and makes a red line under it. I can reference the library, but not use any commands like ReadDWORD, WriteDWORD and so on. Screenshot is attached, this is happening if I load your EnableAllSideloading App, for example. With self-created projects I have the same problem. My system is Win 8.1 Pro x64 and I'm using Visual Studio 2013 Professional. Can you help me? Thanks!
You have added
Registry.winmd in reference library
and
Using Registry;
in your source code
Source code for EnableAllSideloading already has the requisite using directives...
When you look in the project's References, is the Registry library referenced correctly? By default it'll try to use a relative path that I use on my PC, but probably not the same path you use. You may need to manually adjust the reference, or delete it and re-create it.
Alternatively, what auto-fix options does Visual Studio give you when you click on those red lines?
Because my GSM network's automatic time is somehow set wrong, the set automatic time+date doesn't work for me, so this is a quite useful app for me, it can get various NTP server times and synchronize the phone's time and date to it.
It can currently sync with multiple NTP servers, I tried to add as many as I could find, although the default Russian NTP server one works fine most of the time.
Since another person did most of the programming, and not me, it will be updated if needed, but that update might not be immediate...please add any comments bellow...second post is reserved for change log descriptions. Feel free to add your insight, along with any comments, they're all valuable.
TIA
p.s.
As of yet this can't be published to windows phone store because it uses INTEROPSERVICES capability (among other things), if anything about that changes you will be notified immediately with the store link, also you'll be notified if this ever starts working on other manufacturer's phones....until then please make sure your phone is developer unlocked to deploy/sideload it...and that it is interopunlocked to work.
p.p.s.
Last, but not least, thanks to GDTD and dimoniche.
post rsrvd
wow
I was somehow expecting some ugly but functional UI, but this certainly is awesome, and it works flawless!!
and the UI is well done!!
Any chance you can post the source? There's a capability (not INTEROPSERVICES) that specifically enables setting the time; it might be better to use that instead.
GoodDayToDie said:
Any chance you can post the source? There's a capability (not INTEROPSERVICES) that specifically enables setting the time; it might be better to use that instead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you please provide this capability (for setting time)? I've tried to use kernel's SetSystemTime (with GetProcAddress trick) but it always returns 0 (i.e. BOOL FALSE).
You probably want ID_CAP_BUILTIN_SETTIME. Will probably require capability-unlock, but should let you use the Win32 APIs.
By the way, no need to mess with GetProcAddress. You can get the function prototype (from MSDN or from the header files) and link against the relevant library directly (may need to use DLL2LIB to extract the link library from the DLL).
GoodDayToDie said:
You probably want ID_CAP_BUILTIN_SETTIME. Will probably require capability-unlock, but should let you use the Win32 APIs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got a build error: Error 1 The 'Name' attribute is invalid - The value 'ID_CAP_BUILTIN_SETTIME' is invalid according to its datatype 'String' - The Enumeration constraint failed.
GoodDayToDie said:
By the way, no need to mess with GetProcAddress. You can get the function prototype (from MSDN or from the header files) and link against the relevant library directly (may need to use DLL2LIB to extract the link library from the DLL).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
App build by this way will never pass marketplace certification.
Well, not any more than a third-party app using ID_CAP_INTEROPSERVICES (or, probably, ID_CAP_BUILTIN_SETTIME) would, no... Unless you have a reason to try and be sneaky about what the app is doing, I find my approach to be more readable and straightforward. However, it's true that if you're trying to pull a fast one, it probably won't work because the import will appear in the PE data and that's easy to find.
GoodDayToDie said:
However, it's true that if you're trying to pull a fast one, it probably won't work because the import will appear in the PE data and that's easy to find.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm... I believe we've already discussed how that stuff works (as far as I remember, I've sent you a source code). There is no imported function names in the import section, everything loaded dynamically (except one call). And - "yes" - it works perfect for store certification (just check current number of "volume controllers" at the store)