Alright guys. I stepped up. Google Edition (Soon) - ZenFone 2 General

So I decide to step up and buy the Zenfone 2 551. WW MODEL Should have it at my door step on Wednesday. Then fun begins. Going to build a Google edition rom for you all. Be less lag in the phone. With the most power out of the kernel. It will be designed. Around all 3 versions off the 550/551. Time to share some love. Please don't ask for a time stamp. As I am working around my twin boys schedule. After all that's done. I will build a killer theme for this also. To give more colors to work with. TWRP will be tweaked to run a lot smoother for us also. I already sent some emails out to people. To help out on twrp. As that is my weak point. Hope you guys are ready..
Sent from my ASUS ZenFone 2E using XDA Free mobile app

Hell yeah...... \m/

bring it on!!!!

Oooooh exciting
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using XDA Free mobile app

I like Google edition ROM.
But every custom ROM comes without gapps.
Thanks in advance.

It will be fully 64-bit and have the latest PowerVR drivers? Cool

Looking forward to it. I also love GPE ROMs.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using XDA Free mobile app

Send for my ASUS_Z00AD usingXDA Free mobile app

The rom is already built. Just waiting on the phone to get here. It will have all the Google apk's in it. But make it clear to you all. I will not release it until its at least 95-100% bug free. Because I don't want anyone crying.
Sent from my ASUS ZenFone 2E using XDA Free mobile app

64bit x86 Android is different from 32bit version only by kernel (and some kernel related drivers). All libraries are 32bit. Stock ZF2 Android is exactly the same as so-called 64bit AOSP in terms of bitness.
This is standard for x86 Android builds.
Both 64bit and 32bit binaries are supported seamlessly even in stock Android - thanks to x86 instructions set. So, it's up to specific application developer choice how many bits to use in native code.

Thanks so much in advance

sorg said:
64bit x86 Android is different from 32bit version only by kernel (and some kernel related drivers). All libraries are 32bit. Stock ZF2 Android is exactly the same as so-called 64bit AOSP in terms of bitness.
This is standard for x86 Android builds.
Both 64bit and 32bit binaries are supported seamlessly even in stock Android - thanks to x86 instructions set. So, it's up to specific application developer choice how many bits to use in native code.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am little bit confused, do you mean x64bit os in Stock? X64bit apps support in Stock u mean?
If yes, then I don't think so..
Even Asus rep, support, care said what we have in Stock is just x64bit kernel with x32bit os, promised that 5.1 will be full x64bit os for zenfone 2.. And x64bit app of AnTuTu didn't work in zenfone 2 but works with ARM x64bit os

blazinandroid1 said:
The rom is already built. Just waiting on the phone to get here. It will have all the Google apk's in it. But make it clear to you all. I will not release it until its at least 95-100% bug free. Because I don't want anyone crying.
Sent from my ASUS ZenFone 2E using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mate, you'll ALWAYS get people crying... It is an unfortunate thing but there's alweays something someone doesn't understand, do or just plain f!cks up... And you as the dev will always be ground zero for the muck they throw...
So saying, I hope I haven't scred you off because we really need some devs for this puppy...
Has some pretty decent hardware and the software is sorta catching up but it would be nice for another dev's rom to be on the menu.
Cheers mate...

blazinandroid1 said:
So I decide to step up and buy the Zenfone 2 551. WW MODEL Should have it at my door step on Wednesday. Then fun begins. Going to build a Google edition rom for you all. Be less lag in the phone. With the most power out of the kernel. It will be designed. Around all 3 versions off the 550/551. Time to share some love. Please don't ask for a time stamp. As I am working around my twin boys schedule. After all that's done. I will build a killer theme for this also. To give more colors to work with. TWRP will be tweaked to run a lot smoother for us also. I already sent some emails out to people. To help out on twrp. As that is my weak point. Hope you guys are ready..
Sent from my ASUS ZenFone 2E using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
edit..
Troll? Or this is real?
https://www.reddit.com/r/galaxynote4/comments/321a8e/turns_out_that_blazinandroid1_was_a_troll/

meciu99 said:
edit..
Troll? Or this is real?
https://www.reddit.com/r/galaxynote4/comments/321a8e/turns_out_that_blazinandroid1_was_a_troll/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro. That's a whole different person.
Sent from my ASUS ZenFone 2E using XDA Free mobile app

A different person that happens to share the exact same username, state promises despite providing vague technical info, and also happens to have "twin boys".
Yeah, quite the coincidence.

What exactly is a Google Edition rom? Never heard that before.

Very excited to hear this....in for sure.

threi_ said:
A different person that happens to share the exact same username, state promises despite providing vague technical info, and also happens to have "twin boys".
Yeah, quite the coincidence.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, I'll believe it when I see it. No offense to the OP, but how many times on XDA do we see these things?
If he puts a GPE Rom that actually boots up for this phone, I'll eat my words..

ansebovi said:
I am little bit confused, do you mean x64bit os in Stock? X64bit apps support in Stock u mean?
If yes, then I don't think so..
Even Asus rep, support, care said what we have in Stock is just x64bit kernel with x32bit os, promised that 5.1 will be full x64bit os for zenfone 2.. And x64bit app of AnTuTu didn't work in zenfone 2 but works with ARM x64bit os
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linux in Stock ROM is 64bit. This is the *actual* OS.
Android is, hmmm.. how to say.. it's pseudo-OS which doesn't manage neither processes nor memory, but simply uses modified java virtual machine per process.
So, generally speaking, Stock ROM *has* 64bit OS. Only java machine i.e. Android is 32bit.
But, since real OS (Linux kernel) is 64bit, you can use 64bit applications. I mean Linux binaries and libraries.
I compile binaries on my Ubuntu x64 and can freely use them without any modifications on Zenfone 2.
There is NO Android exist which is fully compiled in 64bits on x86 architecture. You can check AOSP configs - all them are using 32bits. Only Kernel (i.e. Linux OS) is 64bits. And Android 5.1.1 has no changes in this subject.
It's like Windows x64 where you can use 32bit applications. So, Stock ROM is 64 bit OS with 32bit Android applications (including 32bit Android framework).

Related

This may help ICS development....

Our Tegra 2 is the AP20H board right? Well other than MOTO specific drivers like finger print reader/webtop shouldn't this help in making a full port with everything working like full acceleration and the like? http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_i9103_galaxy_r-3967.php It has the same board and has official ICS. Sorry if this is a repost, just trying to help the cause.
We need a new kernel, the drivers alone don't help us.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app
Yeh this has been looked at already =/
We do have the drivers needed, but we don't have a compatible kernel, as I've said many times. We can only get the kernel from Motorola.
Sent from my #Motofail... No further Plans coming...
Or we can try to develop kernel from source of another AP20H devices.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1917591
Zeljko1234 said:
Or we can try to develop kernel from source of another AP20H devices.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1917591
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. We need to make our own kernel to get these drivers to work.

Ubuntu Phone installation is out + Source Code

Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Porting info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
Our device is WIP (Work in Progress): https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
tpr0 said:
Hey fellas,
Finally Ubuntu Phone is available for Nexus 4, GNexus...
Along with the source code.
Can't wait, Info: http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/ubuntu-phone-downloads-to-be-released-next-week
Preview (snapshots) on 21st FEB: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TouchInstallProcess ( thats for the nexus 4/ GNexus only, wide range of compatibilities according to hardware specifications and kernels afterwards)
New U.P. developer section on ubuntu.com: http://developer.ubuntu.com/get-started/gomobile/
Once the source code is release, porting will be rolling here
Atrix 4G can still rock up to 2014...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lets hope its compatible with tegra2. I have a windows 8 tablet with real windows, but ubuntu on my atrix i dont say no i hope the experience is good like on the desktop ubuntu.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
harszeee said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wzc0uMXGFBY
it will be on tegra for sure
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea because it's not really a proof that it is working for our tegra phone. it's a lot different so u have to find a phone that has the same specs this but there is no one.
let's see if it will work for us that would be awesome
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
lehjr said:
That's the Atrix 2 (OMAP), and that's Ubuntu for Android rather than Ubuntu Phone OS.
Ubuntu for Android, as I understand it, is basically the Webtop that we've already had for some time now and uses the kernel already on the device, whereas Ubuntu Phone OS is a complete replacement for Android, but the details themselves are a bit sketchy, like what display server they're using, what kernel is supported. Wouldn't it be both ironic and disappointing if it required an ICS/JB kernel, especially since we still have a Froyo/GB kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
harszeee said:
oh sry my mistake thought that was an electrify
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, he identifies the device about 10 seconds or so in, but admittedly if he didn't the only other way to identify it would be process of elimination, looking at the logo's and figuring it out that way.
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
DowJonesARG said:
Guys, there's a post of saiftheboss7 that he mention that he made a request to Mark Shuttleworth, Ubuntu's Guru. You can upvote that request so that the Ubuntu Kahuna sees that us Atrix users want the Ubuntu OS for our beloved A4G. I can't post links right now, too noob for the forum, but you can check it out in this section.
Upvote my friends, upvote and we can have a better functional phone!!!!!:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please don't force the devs to support our phone. just let the image release si the devs can see the source code and the system. After that we can ask to import the os to the atrix if it's possible.
Just be patience.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Sorry is just my nerves speaking. Hope to see it in action soon.
Enviado desde mi Atrix4G
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
wildchild048 said:
Ubuntu was just released and tomorrow they will show how to port to other devices.Hope we can get it to work on our atrix.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah tomorrow is porting lesson can the thread maker update and copy this https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting in? so the people who are intersted can hangout too so we get more people
Do you have, or may be adapted upload released today? ubuntu can only hope that this is no longer
It's released and port lessons are there xD Let's hope it works on atrix
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
Let's hope epinter can work his magic and port this for us.
Sent from my MB886 using xda app-developers app
So no devs are interested?
Re: Ubuntu Phone installation to be avail. on 21th FEB + Source Code
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
please install atrix 4g
rjayflo said:
I think at this moment...devs are more interested in a working kernel for ICS
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this will be fully working without an ICS Kernel.
I think an effort like this worths a try, since we can aways update the userspace ubuntu packages, keeping the old kernel. I don't see why the old gingerbread kernel wouldn't work.

Trying to port JB ROM

Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
rqmok said:
Hey guys.
I am new to android developing.
I started by porting the CM10.1 ROM from HTC Desire, but my phone is stuck at the Huawei logo when it boots up.
I can still flash another ROM, but that is not the problem.
I want to know how to fix this. I want it to go past the Huawei Logo.
By the way, I used this procedure: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1598713 and I used Aurora ICS 5.0 for the base ROM. I know it doesn't have the same version of android, but there is no reason I shouldn't be experimenting like this.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Delete phone.apk and try it?
Sent from my U8800-51
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
I know
Mlopik said:
You can't port CM10.1 ROM to ICS ROM as base. That is inpossible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but it is not completely impossible.
I also tried to port it with CM10.1 that you are trying to fix, but I still get the same thing.
I will setup logcat and upload the information here.
Thanks.
Need to ask something
Hey again.
I haven't had time to do anything to my phone yet.
I am replying to ask if there is an awesome tutorial out there that could help me with this porting?
Currently, to port my ROM, I replaced files in port ROM from base ROM. Should I replace files in base ROM from port ROM?
Thanks for the help.
Hi Again
Hello.
I found out that there was a problem with the base ROM.
I have ported CM10.1 from U8800! Yaay!
But there are four things that are not working:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Cam Recording
- Sound
Can you guys tell me how to fix the audio? In the logcat, it says that there is no sound output.
Thanks
CatLog results
Hey guys.
I've got the log attached to this reply. Have a look at the audio events and see what is wrong. I can't figure it out by myself.
Thanks
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Working on JB
Djuganight said:
When will you releasing it fully functional?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have just ported the Jelly Bean from u8800pro to u8800non-pro, so I will be working on this ROM.
Seriously, I have no idea when I will be releasing a fully functional ROM. Because I have my studies as well, so I don't get much time to work on the ROM.
The audio is working in this ROM (wasn't working in the previous port),
The things that are currently not working are:
- WiFi
- Bluetooth
- Video Recording
I will try my best to do as much as possible.
I am new at building android ROMs, so please don't expect too much from me
I will be needing some help from other developers as well.
Do you think I should make a thread for this? or is there already enough not-fully functional JB ROMs there?
Thanks.:good:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Djuganight said:
Lololololol ridiculous!
Another porting, same issues...
How many are now? 4, 5 Jelly beans?
Ooo man, some times is just better to stay quiet....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know how you feel. I also feel that way.
I would like to build Jelly Bean from source, like Blefish is doing right now, but I need a 64bit computer for that (mine is only 32bit. Unless there is a hack for this, I can't build from source.
I think everyone is going to start porting Jelly Bean ROMs until one starts working. :silly:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Djuganight said:
Everyone is porting the rom with the intention of making ir fully working and then abandon development. Why don't you and others continue the work that is already done instead of making a new port which will end up like the others.
Like your are having compatibility issues due to your 32bit computer, perhaps our device is incompatible with JB...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Mlopik said:
U8800 is compatible with JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's still same ROM with other features.. It isn't simply fix Wi-Fi without source.
Djuganight said:
That I don't know for sure but I believe our is. But why 4 or 5 JB around, all with exactly same issues
Now I and others also pick up a JB Rom, mod it here and there and then instead of 4/5 roms we can have dozens. Then again non working well. This makes sense?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
dark_vader said:
Because most of devs or those who like to be called developers don't have required knowledge and then leave the project as an excuse.
Honestly I have no hope that we can see a JB rom fully functional.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you don't make some for android yourself? if it's so simply.
nagato.fm said:
Our device will remain compatible with every new android untill android will be using some new architecture of processor, so "sometimes it's better to stay silent".
OP, abandon your trials of getting a working JB using copy-paste ports. It can be only ported from source.
P.S.: just install ubuntu x64 and try to build something like CWM recovery out of forumber's source. If it builds, you can build anything you want. Today's computers know how to emulate x64. I'm myself using an old pentium d 820 (i386, sse2 and that's all) and I can build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
rqmok said:
So I can install ubuntu x64 on my x86 laptop? Are you talking about a virtual machine or installing ubuntu x64 on the actual laptop?
And as for others: Instead of saying that JB is not compatible with our device and all that sh*t, why don't you encourage me and give me some solutions.
Anyways, I am not posting this JB ROM until it's fully functional, because I might stop development as well (getting interested in firefox os).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all,your CPU must support x64,If it supported,you can install x64 to you computer.
If you want install x64 system in virtual machine (like VirtualBox),you CPU must support VT-x or AMD-V (virtualization).
You can check virtualization and x64 support via SecurAble;
http://securable.en.softonic.com

[Q] Running SailfishOS on non-Jolla phones?

Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, Sailfish is not yet released to public, and most propably wont be before Jolla phone hits markets. So you can't get it before
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody knows yet, because nobody hasn't been able to have a look at it, since it hasn't been released. But I doubt that the kernel would match, since it doesn't even match on different Android phones. There are always some minor changes.
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i think it will be possible run Sailfish on non-Jolla phone, anyway you should wait because there is no image for arm cpu in public.
tabstop said:
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in android devices in /dev very often is used from binary blobs.
and this blob compiled againts another libc called bionic and it is not compatible with glibc, but Jolla phone will use android drivers via special library.
Sailfish OS for Motorola XT910 ( Droid RAZR )
tabstop said:
Hi all,
Is there any chance to run Sailfish OS on a non-Jolla phone? I would prefer a bigger screen and I'd prefer to not wait for their phone.
Assuming that the drivers from Android are compiled for the same Linux kernel version as I want to run in Sailfish, they should be loadable.
So then it's just a question of whether Sailfish is written to use the same devices (in /dev) in the same ways.
Anybody know?
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, the Sailfish OS runs on linux kernel thats for sure and soon it will have the capability to run almost all of the android apks, which means it can not be totally different form android form 'under-the-hood' so there is always some room to try it on your android devices.
I haven't really tried to explore Sailfish OS much, but if u do, plz tell me and I would like to do it on my phone (Moto xt910).
If you come across any guide for installing Sailfish OS on non-jolla phones, plz post the links here.
sidbhatt11 said:
Well, the Sailfish OS runs on linux kernel thats for sure and soon it will have the capability to run almost all of the android apks, which means it can not be totally different form android form 'under-the-hood' so there is always some room to try it on your android devices.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
running apk doesn`t mean anything, i can run apk on my windows 7.
internaly it is GNU Linux, not android.
sidbhatt11 said:
I haven't really tried to explore Sailfish OS much, but if u do, plz tell me and I would like to do it on my phone (Moto xt910).
If you come across any guide for installing Sailfish OS on non-jolla phones, plz post the links here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you should understand that nobody care about your motorola or what ever device you own. 3.5 developers that can build nemo mobile image will not do it just because of your request.
If I remember right the first demo shown of it was on a nexus phone. so of course it will run on android phone.
tsaxda said:
If I remember right the first demo shown of it was on a nexus phone. so of course it will run on android phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you give URL?
EnErGy[CSDX] said:
can you give URL?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just remember seeing a video demo of it on youtube and the guy giving the demo said it was running on a galaxy nexus. I don't have the link but you could find it easily on youtube.

			
				
It's an open source,isn't it?
c786764052 said:
It's an open source,isn't it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Silica components and that fancy home screen are not open source
I must admit I really like this OS.. even if it is similar to blackberry 10 for some aspects.. if this os will be avaiable for rooted android phones, i will certainly install it on mine!
I'd install it fast if my phone could get this (LG L5), but I think it's too weak on it. Maybe Sony Ericsson xperia neo would take this.
Sent from my LG-E610 using xda app-developers app
N9 arm port is here who starts porting?
EnErGy[CSDX] said:
Yes i think it will be possible run Sailfish on non-Jolla phone, anyway you should wait because there is no image for arm cpu in public.
in android devices in /dev very often is used from binary blobs.
and this blob compiled againts another libc called bionic and it is not compatible with glibc, but Jolla phone will use android drivers via special library.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
since the N9 port of Sailfish OS is now available:
h**p://jollausers.com/2013/12/the-comprehensive-guide-to-port-sailfish-to-n9/
and the arm chipset in the N9 (OMAP3630) is equal to many Android devices like the Defy+ h**p://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OMAP it would be nice to hear that someone begins with the porting to other Android devices. Hopefully also for my Droid 4 (OMAP4430).
https://github.com/KonstaT/sailfishos_kernel_jolla_msm8930
thx to Konsta @ talk.maemo.org
cvp said:
https://github.com/KonstaT/sailfishos_kernel_jolla_msm8930
thx to Konsta @ talk.maemo.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be great if it could run on Galaxy note 2 or 3.

Any updates on SM-T230 Android ports?

This poor device has been stuck on touchwiz 4.4.4 for a very long time, it would be great if somebody tried to port a good rom to it.
Please reply with updates, if there's any.
Scupake said:
This poor device has been stuck on touchwiz 4.4.4 for a very long time, it would be great if somebody tried to port a good rom to it.
Please reply with updates, if there's any.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, But there not a lot of people workng on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 7.0.
DJABHipHop said:
Sorry, But there not a lot of people workng on the Samsung Galaxy Tab 4 7.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is really sad. :crying:
I would like to bring mine back to new live too.
Please, dear developers, take care of the 7" Tab 4 too. :fingers-crossed:
Best regards
Balze
I'm working on bringing a fairly new version to degas, probably Android 7 or 8.
im getting ready to refresh the kernel for this device and might be able to help with porting android 10
JohnnyStene said:
I'm working on bringing a fairly new version to degas, probably Android 7 or 8.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
beany23 said:
im getting ready to refresh the kernel for this device and might be able to help with porting android 10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Presently sitting on an old build ROM
Pixelized-OS-v2.9-20180816-SM-T230NU-FIX
That has worked relatively well even on this device with limited storage, processor, and memory. Either way, I'd love to help my unit has been rooted for 3 or so years and please let all of us know if we can help.
Please also note, I use this device only as a backup, so starting over and trying something fresh can happen quickly.
Thanks for the help and support,
Sorli...
bsorli said:
Presently sitting on an old build ROM
Pixelized-OS-v2.9-20180816-SM-T230NU-FIX
That has worked relatively well even on this device with limited storage, processor, and memory. Either way, I'd love to help my unit has been rooted for 3 or so years and please let all of us know if we can help.
Please also note, I use this device only as a backup, so starting over and trying something fresh can happen quickly.
Thanks for the help and support,
Sorli...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android 10 should work with some optimization- porting the kernel to a relatively new version would likely be the hardest part.
JohnnyStene said:
Android 10 should work with some optimization- porting the kernel to a relatively new version would likely be the hardest part.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can only try lol
I just found all device tree specific blobs and all that. Can start from there at least. Then once we get it booted and working then we can go for Android 8-10
beany23 said:
I just found all device tree specific blobs and all that. Can start from there at least. Then once we get it booted and working then we can go for Android 8-10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How complicated is it to slim down the builds as much as possible?
I don't see needing all the extra TouchWiz crap that this device barely supports and had survived using Link2SD for storage. Something stable supporting at least basic apps is all I need, and most of those (Gmail, Chrome, etc) are now available from play store.
Thanks for trying and let me know if o can help! Sorli...
beany23 said:
im getting ready to refresh the kernel for this device and might be able to help with porting android 10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Join Telegram there are a lot of Tab 7.0 uses out there and we could use more Developers for the tab 4 7.0
beany23 said:
I just found all device tree specific blobs and all that. Can start from there at least. Then once we get it booted and working then we can go for Android 8-10
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, my advice is starting by taking sources from other variants (you can find them in GitHub S3NEO organization) and editing sources by starting from that base. For the kernel, it shouldn't be difficult to make a defconfig by always looking in matisse and millet ones. I advice you to start from Android 9 (lineage-16.0 branches) since they are the most stable. If you are really interested to work, you can write me in Telegram (same username as xda profile) and I can write you something more about what you should do.
Android 8, 9 or 10 will be nice, but right now I will be happy with Android 5. Are there any ROMs for degas higher than 4.4.4?
Are there any true Android 5 or Android 7 ROMs for this device?
BenGman said:
Android 8, 9 or 10 will be nice, but right now I will be happy with Android 5. Are there any ROMs for degas higher than 4.4.4?
Are there any true Android 5 or Android 7 ROMs for this device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For now most of the ROMs out there are based on touchwiz so they are 4.4 with themes. I hope devs can build proper Android 8+ ROM for our good old buddy
onlime1 said:
For now most of the ROMs out there are based on touchwiz so they are 4.4 with themes. I hope devs can build proper Android 8+ ROM for our good old buddy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can't because degas has different SoC and nobody of the devs have this device. So, we can't do anything.
matteo0026 said:
We can't because degas has different SoC and nobody of the devs have this device. So, we can't do anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah that Marvell CPU and Vivante GPU is a real headache I guess. Why Samsung put them in it lol Maybe one day (when NewPipe stops fully working on my Tab 4) I'll grab a new Tab (probably S series this time).
delete
I have given up on porting brand new Android versions (for now) and right now I have Android 5 running. Quite unstable at the moment.
gediao15693xda said:
I ask developers to make Android 5 + ROM on Degas, because there are many apps in China that can't run on Android 4.4. Sorry, my English
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That problem is not only for China dude. That's why most of the people (incl. me) want newer Android to our loved Degas
Because Android development for this tablet seem to be DEAD I started to wonder if I could install Windows 10? I bumped to this thing claiming it can install WIndows to any android tablet but I'm yet to try it out...
https://www.changemysoftwares.com/

Categories

Resources