Database Users

HoneyComb Now!

Android 3.0 aka Honeycomb preview sdk has landed....
can someone compile it for for DHD....
i know Dhd is not tablet but its big enough....
http://developer.android.com/sdk/preview/index.html

PLEASE!!!
Yes please, can someone cook this up for our DHD's?

Errr, I'm sure an SDK is just an SDK and not a source? Want to cook it? See if it works with the guide on cooking your own rom in this forum...

http://img341.imageshack.us/g/appsc.jpg/

jkoljo said:
http://img341.imageshack.us/g/appsc.jpg/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
looks awesome

Well lets hope Kali from cyanogen will take on this challenge...though no source code is out...and it wont be out for some time...
Geez..now gingerbread seems so 2010 lol

I extracted the wallpapers if anyone wants them

MrYuiM said:
Errr, I'm sure an SDK is just an SDK and not a source? Want to cook it? See if it works with the guide on cooking your own rom in this forum...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, it's not that easy

Looks pretty swish.
Swyped from my superfast, LeeDrOid DHD, on the XDA app.

Neeeeeed ! plz !!

I would rather prefer a very stable gb version with good battery life than something that will take months to develop.
Sent from my LeeDroided Desire HD

Looks very nice!
I hope someone can compile a build for Desire HD
Can't wait. I think Google's really going to port their tablet design also to smartphones.

nickiberli said:
lol, it's not that easy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but it's by no means impossible the first froyo custom ROM's where developed from the emulator images within the SDK so i wouldn't be surprised to see some limited functionality ROM's popping up in the next week or so

mariosraptor said:
I would rather prefer a very stable gb version with good battery life than something that will take months to develop.
Sent from my LeeDroided Desire HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are numerous stable builds of Gingerbread around this section, what are you waiting for?! Battery Life is also very acceptable on CM7 builds, much better than it was on CM6.
Just been looking at the Honeycomb emulator and it looks great, but I don't think it's built with the smartphone in mind.
Regards.

but I thought it is only for tablet. Will we lose our fone function?

this would be too awesome, seems to be cyanogenmod8 is in production, tablets have fone function as well ... so it wont loose any !

+1 it would be really gr8 if someone do us this favor and develops a 3.0 ROM. That would be really awesome.

first of all, sdk's never give a good rom, and second this is just a preview

Ran it on my emulator. Pretty sweet. Though Honeycomb would be much worse since it's for the tablet freaks but looks pretty nice

who is hAve here a link rom honeycomb for dhd ?

ics for xperia 2011

http://blogs.sonymobile.com/wp/2012...e-for-unlocked-2011-xperia-smartphone-models/
look there , can some one port this to x8 ?

You can't have this on the X8 because of the following reasons:
We need at least 512 Mb of Ram. 1 Ghz Cpu minimum or at least 825 mhz.

n1kolaa said:
look there , can some one port this to x8 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must be using Xperia™ arc S, Xperia™ neo V or Xperia™ ray, running the latest Xperia™ software release (which is 4.0.2.A.0.42). Please note that you can’t use the original Xperia™ arc or Xperia™ neo, as they have different partition layouts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, have much fun trying to port the ROM for the devices mentioned above to the ARMv6VFP of the W/X8.
But then...
Look here, we actually already have a partly working ICS ROM for the X8

Porting now

BIG JD said:
Porting now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what does porting now mean?
that means you are porting this rom to x8?

theroom3600 said:
what does porting now mean?
that means you are porting this rom to x8?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems like it, Googling It might help, lol.
Yes he is porting it, to the x8, but as b.jay said, we already have a ics port partly running our devices.
Anyway, good luck porting, I tried but im a beginner on making android roms, I have my own project ti work on . Anyway,good luck
Sent from my X8 using XDA App

BIG JD said:
Porting now
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good luck if you need help call me

8
They are already doing the firmware - ice cream sandwich, and for x8 can not do normal 2.3! What the hell?

i think ICS not good for x8,cause x8 hardware not supported it

I think too.. but wait and see

xperiandra said:
i think ICS not good for x8,cause x8 hardware not supported it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
boisdulait said:
I think too.. but wait and see
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What the hell are you guys talking about ?! If that's the case, paul-xxx's cm9 shouldn't even work

I've never said that he's working for nothing..
Just that x8 has hardware limits.. It's very difficult for me to try explain it in english..
Look. Try to port windows 7 on a 800mhz with 256mb ram.. It will be extremely difficult.. I think it's a little the same.
Course he's doing great job.. I tested it and it's running well.. but I'm perplexed that we can run ICS with all of his fonctionnality on our x8.
But I hope I'm wrong

boisdulait said:
I've never said that he's working for nothing..
Just that x8 has hardware limits.. It's very difficult for me to try explain it in english..
Look. Try to port windows 7 on a 800mhz with 256mb ram.. It will be extremely difficult.. I think it's a little the same.
Course he's doing great job.. I tested it and it's running well.. but I'm perplexed that we can run ICS with all of his fonctionnality on our x8.
But I hope I'm wrong
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing in IMPOSSIBLE... it's sometimes confused with very, very, very hard
Sent from my X8 using xda premium

I think you're right : nothing is impossible..
But I think too you understand my reasoning

ICS -v- Task 14 /\ My Review

I have seen a lot of talk lately with people comparing the ICS development ROM's to Task 14.. I have been swapping back and forth almost daily between AOKP #23 and Task 14 Slim so here are my thoughts..
1st of all both are awesome ROM's that offer plusses and minuses depending on what each individual wants and needs.. These observations are based on MY wants and needs so opinions will vary.. The fact that Task 14, a HC 3.2 ROM even gets mentioned / compared to an ICS ROM speaks volumes about how good it is..
Things I like about AOKP #23:
--Browser hardware acceleration
--No screenshot soft key (I loathe that thing)
--ROM Control
--Ability to set # of homescreens
--Swipe to dismiss
Things I like about Task 14:
--Rock solid and stable
--Camera works for video chat
--Just as fast as ICS in many areas and faster in some
--Mini widgets
--Several awesome themes available
The AOKP is actually pretty stable for the most part and Roman and team have done an awesome job on it but remember it's a beta so there is issues and bugs at the time of this posting.. Task 14 is super rock solid and its really only limited by HC 3.2..
I honestly can't decide which I like better.. They both ROCK! I guess that's why I change between them daily..
A few AOKP issues I have is with apps and the screen.. Words with friends is a good example of this.. Also, the screen gets a little glitchy at times when viewing online images.. Nothing major and by no means a put down on AOKP...
I have had zero issues on Task 14 that are not widespread HC 3.2 related..
If you can live without the camera and are willing to experience a few minor bugs here and there then the AOKP may be for you.. If however you want rock solid with zero bugs, a working camera and a system that is just as fast then Task 14 may be for you..
These are MY thoughts and comparison of 2 kick a$$ ROM's... Thoughts and replies are welcome but please don't turn this thread into a pi$$ing match...

You're just asking for a pissing match. I'll just watch... for now...:sly:
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.

I hope not since they are both awesome ROM's...

I've tried ics, very fast and smooth without touchwiz is a godsend. There is only one 3g ics rom so I have not tried romanb's yet. 3g is a big deal to me. Other thing with isc is no proper USB/mass storage support. It does not show all files that I've downloaded from net except whatever files I transferred to tab. Camera is another big issue for me, or lack of. Video does not work also from the rom I tried. Some apps on market not supported also so cant update. That's my summary of isc. HC3.2 on the other hand is improving. I have not tried Task as again no 3g. I'm a big fan of Alterbridge and his Overcome roms. Been using his rom since the original Tab. His latest 2.3.0 soup up with pershoot kernel is more than great for me. ISC is great but for my daily usage, its not ready yet.
Sent from my GT-P7500 using XDA App

raqball said:
I hope not since they are both awesome ROM's...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wait its coming bro...
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.

I do realize this is XDA but I guess I hope we all will act like adults and that this mini review will help anyone who can't choose between these 2 awesome ROM's.. Heck I'm having a hard time choosing.. The OP was made on Task 14 and this post is getting made on AOKP..

Good comparsion between the two. Personally, I use Task14 with b00sted's ICS theme. No ICS can compare to it right now, but once the camera issue is solved, ICS will be boss.
All us Task fans are hoping for a Task ICS ROM soon.
BTW, good thread OP.

A Task ICS ROM will be awesome once it comes.. I'm back on the AOKP for this morning as least..

I think we scared off the ones that would have made this a pissing match. Good.
BTW- nice OP.
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.

How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?

donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is comparing what is available today. The OP is well aware that ICS is in development but he is looking for a daily driver and was looking for others opinions on what we use.
Until ICS is official there is no way to do a 1 for 1 comparison.

donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's easy.. I use them both daily and figured my post might help others who are on the fence or not sure which to use..
Anything can be compared.. Pinto -v- Corvette or Blonde -v- Brunette ect....

donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Easy you try them both and yes ics is alpha but thats what is available now and is the point of this thread. I came to the same conclusion as the OP after using both kang versions. the arguably incremental improvement in smoothness does not outweigh the full functionality goodness of galaxytask
Adding Visidon even gives me face unlock features and with camera ics+ i get the camera panorama functionality on my galaxy task rom
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk

ICS ........... almost stable!
donniezazen said:
How can you compare Android 4.0 (No official release and by the way in Alpha state) and Android 3.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Even though it is supposed to be alpha (since the Camera mainly does not work and there are also some minor bugs), it is quite stable for daily use as I myself use it and the best part is there are some amazing customisation options ..... literally mind blowing!

Thanks for the review. Still haven't custom rom'd it up yet.
When does the official ics come out?

i have found that the battery in the latest ICS kangs (not the one on XDA as that doesnt get updated! but the one on rootzwiki) is by far lots better than any HC.
So indeed for an alpha release ICS is looking very good compare to an already establish HC rom.
So I can only imagine how good ICS will be when SS releases it...hopefully in April..
bit OT interesting that there are no leaks yet from samfirmware!

nandihno said:
i have found that the battery in the latest ICS kangs (not the one on XDA as that doesnt get updated! but the one on rootzwiki)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Romanbb is constantly updating the AOKP...

wtgserpant said:
Even though it is supposed to be alpha (since the Camera mainly does not work and there are also some minor bugs), it is quite stable for daily use as I myself use it and the best part is there are some amazing customisation options ..... literally mind blowing!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mind blowing? seriously? did you just come from using my Packard bell 286 from the back of my closest? Just kidding. But mind blowing compared to what? stock?
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.

Benzoman said:
mind blowing? seriously? did you just come from using my Packard bell 286 from the back of my closest? Just kidding. But mind blowing compared to what? stock?
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol im with benzoman on this one...
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk

Benzoman said:
mind blowing? seriously? did you just come from using my Packard bell 286 from the back of my closest? Just kidding. But mind blowing compared to what? stock?
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree as well... ICS is not mind blowing and is only slightly snappier than Taks 14 in some areas..

Chanses of Jelly Beans on HD2

Till now we all know that Android 4.1 Jellybeans is in slot now. Even SDK is out. Sources are not on-line though. But I believe it will be very soon.
Now it's a big question whether HTC HD2 can hold Jellybeans or not? As fas as information on net concern Yes we can see JellyBeans on our beloved HD2. As drivers are almost same so it wont be a big problem to port it in our phone. With only 5-6 major changes JB is almost same as ICS. Some new features are there in JB like Google NOW, Off-line voice text is very cool about JB.
So in short we will see JB as soon as they release source codes.
If you find anything interesting you guys can post here so that we can have faith that HD2 will have JB.
Happy Hacking.

A dump of 4.1 has alreaady been posted on the NAND Thread, about 5 hours before your post, so shouldn't be too long to see if it can be ported.

I will still stick with GB but I'm willing to try JB. I hope they have the fix for Netflix. ICS still have some problem.

No it doesn't, it's pretty much perfect. I personally have no flaws in my day-to-day ICS usage.

Nigeldg said:
No it doesn't, it's pretty much perfect. I personally have no flaws in my day-to-day ICS usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have to agree with you there
and the tytung ics rom is freaking awesome

Don't get me wrong. I love Tytung's work as well. I flashed 4.04 just few hours ago because Netflix has a new update. I thought it will solve the problem and keep me from using ICS for good but still Netflix won't cooperate.

Really quite disappointed jellybean is only a slightly tweaked version of ics.. was expecting a fresh os.. nevertheless I simply cannot wait for a jb rom to pop up

Tenpin said:
Really quite disappointed jellybean is only a slightly tweaked version of ics.. was expecting a fresh os.. nevertheless I simply cannot wait for a jb rom to pop up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it is indeed. But few of the features are seems to be awesome. What I am exiting about is New google play an google now.

But if you think about it, the whole project butter thing will make the OS feel like something new. I simply cannot wait for it to be available on our devices
Sent from space..

amarb70 said:
But if you think about it, the whole project butter thing will make the OS feel like something new. I simply cannot wait for it to be available on our devices
Sent from space..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree here, I have been waiting long enough to see iOS smoothness on android, and hopefully its finally coming.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA Premium App

Marvlesz said:
I agree here, I have been waiting long enough to see iOS smoothness on android, and hopefully its finally coming.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my NexusHD2 using xda premium

Very Nice Rom I Tried it now for 5 days its very stable :fingers-crossed:

Android L preview for s/s plus

Would it be posible to port Android L preview to s/s plus? It's probably posible.
I wish someone tries to do that.

I vote for this, we need "Android L" on Galaxy i9000.

No its not possible i guess. We must wait for cm12
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Free mobile app

DJdarkster said:
No its not possible i guess. We must wait for cm12
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still not possible because of the space availiable in the device

chrisg4 said:
Still not possible because of the space availiable in the device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the problem is only the available space ?

No and the hardware limitation because they cant handle the 3.10 kernel

chrisg4 said:
No and the hardware limitation because they cant handle the 3.10 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess I need a new phone.

space?
space is not a problem, a slim cm12 rom like SlimCM could have enough free space, and moving all posible apps to SD would help to, and ART would be good for a second life to our phone.
But, about the hardware limitations, there is maybe some way to use the 3.4 drivers with 3.10 kernels? And, I ask, did the 3.4 kernel initially support our devices?

tonibm19 said:
space is not a problem, a slim cm12 rom like SlimCM could have enough free space, and moving all posible apps to SD would help to, and ART would be good for a second life to our phone.
But, about the hardware limitations, there is maybe some way to use the 3.4 drivers with 3.10 kernels? And, I ask, did the 3.4 kernel initially support our devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No this is not possible because 3.10 kernel has lot of changes...we can use only the android L if we are able to use 3.4 kernel but we will lose many features probably

chrisg4 said:
No this is not possible because 3.10 kernel has lot of changes...we can use only the android L if we are able to use 3.4 kernel but we will lose many features probably
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Android L beta uses 3.4 kernel and has almost all features of the final version. All apps of the final version will work in beta.

rdrai said:
Phone is flying like nitro after enabled ART
Thanks for making this possible
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why android L makes sense, our phone could have a second life.
(Posting it here to not spam CM11 thread)

Don't worry, the CM12 is in production

scarmau said:
Don't worry, the CM12 is in production
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice
So no EOL in sight

scarmau said:
Don't worry, the CM12 is in production
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In production for the supported phones, not the S plus.
Or will you try to make it for S/S+?

lag
i thing android L i9000 will be lag

mdragon13 said:
i thing android L i9000 will be lag
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello, not me, not like KK android L is created for can to be use on low/old phones so we have a chance to use better L than K on our galaxy s
PS : sorry for my English I'm still learning.

mouchtik93 said:
Hello, not me, not like KK android L is created for can to be use on low/old phones so we have a chance to use better L than K on our galaxy s
PS : sorry for my English I'm still learning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
KitKat was already developed for low end devices, as it only needs 512 MB RAM and has a low graphics mode. But Lollipop needs more process power for its animations and other new features. I know it's sad, but we all knew that this journey would come to an end one day.
But that's just my two cents, maybe someone will port L and it works good [emoji6]

käsebr0t said:
KitKat was already developed for low end devices, as it only needs 512 MB RAM and has a low graphics mode. But Lollipop needs more process power for its animations and other new features. I know it's sad, but we all knew that this journey would come to an end one day.
But that's just my two cents, maybe someone will port L and it works good [emoji6]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We've had a good run though. Our galaxy S has had some incredible support from A LOT of incredible devs. In fact were still getting new ROMs and updates now even after all the years our phones have been about. I don't think that L will run smoothly, but most likely we will see L hitting our phones, and maybe some dev will find a way of getting this to run well on our phones. Devs seem to love a challenge. It's thanks to such great devs that I'm still using my S1 as my daily driver after 4 years even after changing phones once, not liking the upgrade, and coming back.
A BIG THANK YOU TO ALL DEVS WHO HAVE GRACED OUR BELOVED S1.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2

RuffBuster said:
We've had a good run though. Our galaxy S has had some incredible support from A LOT of incredible devs. In fact were still getting new ROMs and updates now even after all the years our phones have been about. I don't think that L will run smoothly, but most likely we will see L hitting our phones, and maybe some dev will find a way of getting this to run well on our phones. Devs seem to love a challenge. It's thanks to such great devs that I'm still using my S1 as my daily driver after 4 years even after changing phones once, not liking the upgrade, and coming back.
A BIG THANK YOU TO ALL DEVS WHO HAVE GRACED OUR BELOVED S1.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can only say the same about the s+. If it hasn't been for our great developers, I would probably have selledy phone after less than a year. [emoji106]

Thanks
Thanks to all developers who have worked for our Galaxy S, and we hope to see even Android L .
There are news about it?