Related
The kernel has been open sourced, by CM, as any OEM should do when device hits retail. That means a great step for us, ROM developers. We may discuss findings for reference on future development here.
Link to source code: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8974
By the way, it's not only useful for the OnePlus One, seems that it's interesting for Find 7 as they borrow some code from it, worthy to read.
Oh Gr8 news ! Hope we could get custom kernel on OPO soon
Sent from my One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I am hoping we get one soon also.
Sent from my One using Tapatalk
SferaDev said:
The kernel has been open sourced, by CM, as any OEM should do when device hits retail. That means a great step for us, ROM developers. We may discuss findings for reference on future development here.
Link to source code: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8974
By the way, it's not only useful for the OnePlus One, seems that it's interesting for Find 7 as they borrow some code from it, worthy to read.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mind putting together the flashable zip of the stock kernel so that users who go custom kernel flashing (Franco for now) can fall back to the stock kernel?
A flashable .zip would be great
@SferaDev Thanks for this, I will be using this to build a kernel for our devices
Gamma control is out:
0f98e789af8c12ce3687cbe4515b429aa1e031a3 video: mdss: Add predefined gamma selection
I'm a bit confused.
So far, I know of two kernel sources: This one and AOSP-compatible sources released by OnePlus directly (OnePlusTech on github, can't post links at my postcount).
However, there are already custom kernels that claim to only work with CM11S, and others that claim to only work with CM11. I assume the latter are based on this source. So what's the current (official) branch for CM11S?
DrDaxxy said:
I'm a bit confused.
So far, I know of two kernel sources: This one and AOSP-compatible sources released by OnePlus directly (OnePlusTech on github, can't post links at my postcount).
However, there are already custom kernels that claim to only work with CM11S, and others that claim to only work with CM11. I assume the latter are based on this source. So what's the current (official) branch for CM11S?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OnePlus AOSP is really new and I personally recommend CMs one. Their original intention was to keep as CM as possible...
SferaDev said:
OnePlus AOSP is really new and I personally recommend CMs one. Their original intention was to keep as CM as possible...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So kernels that don't work with the stock ROM are just based on a newer revision of the kernel in CM's repo, and older revisions in there would boot CM11S just fine?
DrDaxxy said:
So kernels that don't work with the stock ROM are just based on a newer revision of the kernel in CM's repo, and older revisions in there would boot CM11S just fine?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't faced ANY kernel that doesn't work...
A flashable zip will be great! Can any expert help on this?
Does anyone know who are the best known recognized developer groups making Roms for the G3 (if any)?
rumors, maybes, confirmed?
I've heard cm is on it, but other than that idk
---------- Post added at 06:36 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:24 PM ----------
Also think I they I heard dirty unicorn is working on it, and I knoe OctOS had plans to support, but I don't think they've started yet
Cm probably do a great job on this device like others but we don't know any others yet because G3 used to have a bootloader lock.
Let's hope plenty of developers jump on board now the boot Loader problem had been circumnavigated.
Apparently LiquidSmooth is being worked on.
I would love to see purity rom on this beast also.
Can't wait to get Dirty with some Dirty Unicorns :highfive:
I haven't bothered rooting because there are no roms yet. Would be interesting to know what to expect. Cm is at least something promising.
Ohh! Purity ROM on this phone will go blazing fast! Can't wait for the flood of ROMS
shadehh said:
I haven't bothered rooting because there are no roms yet. Would be interesting to know what to expect. Cm is at least something promising.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm the same shadehh regards rooting. Untill the main stream rom makers are churning out top quality stuff I'll hold on.
I'd love to see Archidroid here. Some of the finest IMHO.
i have asked on the g+ page of aicp and test builds will be made as soon as the sources are released to bump the roms
miui
Hi guys...i love to see miui offical rom also is there any news about that.
Maybe we should let'em know about bump...
reza1995live said:
Hi guys...i love to see miui offical rom also is there any news about that.
Maybe we should let'em know about bump...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bump! has already gained enough publicity from some tech blogs for ROM devs to know about it. Let's wait and give Team Codefire time to release the bumping process & I'm pretty sure we'll see a couple of ROMs pop-up soon after that!
CandyKat are working on a ROM. I asked the other day https://plus.google.com/114490049576855321482/posts/CAoWbPPn2cF (scroll to the bottom).
biron_w said:
CandyKat are working on a ROM. I asked the other day https://plus.google.com/114490049576855321482/posts/CAoWbPPn2cF (scroll to the bottom).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes we are. We have a sprint build waiting to be bumped already. Working in some device trees for other variants. We are very interested in developing for this phone as a few of us on the team have it.
I'm not too bothered about custom roms but would love to see custom kernel, something like boeffla on S3, that would be awesome
Cuzz1369 said:
Yes we are. We have a sprint build waiting to be bumped already. Working in some device trees for other variants. We are very interested in developing for this phone as a few of us on the team have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good news Hopefully you will do a build for the d855 and if you need a tester I'm more than happy to help.
Cuzz1369 said:
Yes we are. We have a sprint build waiting to be bumped already. Working in some device trees for other variants. We are very interested in developing for this phone as a few of us on the team have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Excellent news I was running CandyKat on my Nexus 4 before I upgraded to a G3 so I'll be very happy when it's available :good:
if you need a tester I'm more than happy to help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll happily test builds as well for the D855. Anything to help get CandyKat up and running.
Cuzz1369 said:
Yes we are. We have a sprint build waiting to be bumped already. Working in some device trees for other variants. We are very interested in developing for this phone as a few of us on the team have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your interest in creating ROMs for the G3. Seeing the increase in developer participation over the past week or so has been great. If you plan to put out any VS985 builds, I'd be happy to give them a test run.
--------------------------------------------------------
Candykat maintainer
Ville (2.15/2.16 Hboots)
M7gsm
M8 (current device)
OnePlus One (coming soon)
i9300
gsw5700 said:
I'm not too bothered about custom roms but would love to see custom kernel, something like boeffla on S3, that would be awesome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats my greatest hope!!!! that kernal was amazing
Hi people,
With the recent announcement of @pedestre (creator of apolo kernel) that the development of apolo kernel comes to an end and Gustavo kernel does not be updated since a long time, we have no costum kernel for the many 5.1.1 roms that are coming to our phones....
Many people uses bln, cpu and gpu voltages control etc.
I want to ask someone with skils who can compile latest cm kernel, witch i think that will be compatible with all newest 5.1.1 roms, with basiclly feautures like bln and others... and if its possible, keep it update with lates cm realises....
Thanks, i hope some dev can help us
Yes, we need kernel developers
Maybe @Resync , @stelistcristi , @chhapil or @warrior1208 ?
Here is tutorial: How to build Gustavo kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=54997129
Zile995 said:
Yes, we need kernel developers
Maybe @Resync , @stelistcristi , @chhapil or @warrior1208 ?
Here is tutorial: How to build Gustavo kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=54997129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Always been considering to build a kernel, especially porting dorimanx to lollipop. Having trouble on ubuntu with dorimanx's instructions, so I will try bbqlinux instead and see how it goes.
Zile995 said:
Yes, we need kernel developers
Maybe @Resync , @stelistcristi , @chhapil or @warrior1208 ?
Here is tutorial: How to build Gustavo kernel http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=54997129
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can develop if @pedestre can give me the permissions to let me continue Apolo. Although, I'll do that and all the other ROMs' building stuff after 6th of June.
warrior1208 said:
I can develop if @pedestre can give me the permissions to let me continue Apolo. Although, I'll do that and all the other ROMs' building stuff after 6th of June.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sure he would give you persmission to do that.
Right now I'm cloning my repo of dorimanx kernel. Have made a few changes like chhapil (except no uber tc yet). I'll see if I can release something next week (however will be very busy with exams). I'm still very new at building kernels so expect a few quirks with the kernel.
---------- Post added at 07:12 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:10 AM ----------
Nightshadow931 said:
I'm sure he would give you persmission to do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be alright since android kernel is open source.
This thread is already awsome!
Yes please LL Kernel! CM sourced RR for galaxy s2 gt i9100 needs kernel!
Developers please come forward we beg you!
@warrior1208 Instead of continuing a Kernel, why not make and develop one yourself and name the kernel yourself as well? It would be nice if there's a new kernel name in our device. Just suggesting here...
:good:
souler456 said:
@warrior1208 Instead of continuing a Kernel, why not make and develop one yourself and name the kernel yourself as well? It would be nice if there's a new kernel name in our device. Just suggesting here...
:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see. I'll try. But first, I have to update all the three ROMs and then a custom kernel. Although, as I stated, I'll be able to do that after 6th of June.
Regards.
warrior1208 said:
Let's see. I'll try. But first, I have to update all the three ROMs and then a custom kernel. Although, as I stated, I'll be able to do that after 6th of June.
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, man. Take your sweet time, and thanks for the response :good:
:good:
I vote for gustavo's kernel since last version of it was just everything i needed. Miss it's colour control very much
I would love to see a TWRP kernel, as I use the file manager to delete unwanted system files on rom updates.
I do think it has a more friendly UI too.
We need 2 type of kernel. One like gustavo_s' and other is like apolo.
One for full control
And other is daily usage and more stable
Or maybe one based on apolo with CPU and GPU OC
OskarUA said:
I vote for gustavo's kernel since last version of it was just everything i needed. Miss it's colour control very much
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure there not much work needed to get Gustavo's kernel working on newer lollipop builds. Right now, I've made changes to io schedulers, TCP algorithm, supersu. Still have no clue how to get build started, at least there's progress. Change of mind. Will be busy with exams.
Zile995 said:
Or maybe one based on apolo with CPU and GPU OC
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then apolo configurator must be updated too
Latest twrp CM based kernel is available in my threads...second post.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=61055230
Where is your thread? Link please.
JudgeDread11 said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=61055230
Where is your thread? Link please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...dirtyunicorns-v9-3-unofficial-builds-t3111998
nhmanas said:
Then apolo configurator must be updated too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually no, everything can be done through terminal. That is, indeex, how apolo configurator/stweaks or any other such app works. Just executing commands.
Our device is still running because of XDA and the developers. And this 3 year + device is still in race to taste the Marshmallow .
Let us use this thread for discussion related to it.
And all of this has become possible because of the recognized developers @JustArchi @dhiru1602 @mcgi5sr2 @Moster2 @arter97, Christian Balster (OMNI team), @forkbomb444 Haxynox team, Nameless team (Sorry, in case I missed someone)
There are 3 projects going on for getting a build of Marshmallow.(Achieved)
The Haxynox Team --- [ AOSP M is out --- Check it out ]
The Official CM --- [ The First to come --- CM 13 Thread Link ] && { It's happening, nightlies are here - Official CM-13 Download Link }
The Nameless Team --- [ It will happen ]
For the list of Marshmallow ROM's available for S3 GT-I9300, Click below:
Official CM13 : Thread Link
Official RESSURRECTION REMIX : Thread Link
Temasek's UNOFFICIAL CyanogenMod 13 : Thread Link
Official Mokee Open Source Project : Thread Link
The CyanPop 6.x.x Project : Thread Link
Minimal OS : Thread Link
Android Ice Cold Project : Thread Link
The Haxynox Team
They are the first to initialize the process of building Marshmallow for our device tree.
Developers: @mcgi5sr2 @Ivan_Meler @dexter93
You can get the latest 'M' AOSP from here : Haxynox AOSP 'M' Link
Github: Link
Official CM 13
The development process of CM 13 has just started few days back.
Developers: Simon Shields , CM team.
Gerrit Link: I9300-M-BringUp || smdk4412
Here comes the first building project of Marshmallow CM 13 :
CM 13 Thread Link
PS: No one knows who XYZ is on XDA. I searched for him on Github and came through this account of a developer ,which has the same commits as published on Official CM Gerrit.
The link of the Github is keepcalm444 and may be it is XYZ's user name.
An XDA account matched it forkbomb444 ( The email used for commit in Official CM Gerrit Review matches it .
(I am not sure about it)
The unknown developer is none other than @forkbomb444
Official Nameless Team
They have asserted that they will definitely release Marshmallow for our device.
Source : Google+ Post
Developers: @dhiru1602 , Nameless Team.
You can follow their work on the thread here : Nameless ROM Link
Google+ Community (They are active here): Nameless ROM Official Community
Gerrit: Nameless ROM Gerrit
Note: I will update any information if something new happens. I welcome you to suggest new thoughts or new information.
You're forgetting Bliss team and their maintainers and developers who are also working to bring marshmallow to our phone. They've done a wonderful job on blisspop (I can tell you myself since I've been using their ROM as a daily driver for past weeks and I have no complaints about it)
Yes forkbomb(xda) this guy is maintaining cm13 official i ask on irc(he use this nickname)
That CM "Maintainer" is just using old commits from evryone else at the list and most of the time violating authorship by just squashing commits and putting his name on it
Romflasher69 said:
You're forgetting Bliss team and their maintainers and developers who are also working to bring marshmallow to our phone. They've done a wonderful job on blisspop (I can tell you myself since I've been using their ROM as a daily driver for past weeks and I have no complaints about it)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love Blisspop too! I have tried lots of ROMS. At the end, blisspop! Thanks.
Ivan_Meler said:
That CM "Maintainer" is just using old commits from evryone else at the list and most of the time violating authorship by just squashing commits and putting his name on it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe not because he has pushed some commits of his own also.
---------- Post added at 02:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:38 PM ----------
And BTW are you guys sure that we will be getting the official CM13.0? No changes in github from last 2 days.
sunny1234590 said:
Maybe not because he has pushed some commits of his own also.
---------- Post added at 02:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:38 PM ----------
And BTW are you guys sure that we will be getting the official CM13.0? No changes in github from last 2 days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didnt see his own changes at all they are just changes from other devs with his name on top..
sunny1234590 said:
Maybe not because he has pushed some commits of his own also.
---------- Post added at 02:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:38 PM ----------
And BTW are you guys sure that we will be getting the official CM13.0? No changes in github from last 2 days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear Brother, building a ROM is not like a game.
Things are always not pushed directly into gerrit everyday, it is a long process than we think.
And coming to another thing, we (normal users) have very less idea about development. It is better to keep calm than raising unnecessary issues. This issue can only be solved by a proper answer from the CM developer.
Romflasher69 said:
You're forgetting Bliss team and their maintainers and developers who are also working to bring marshmallow to our phone. They've done a wonderful job on blisspop (I can tell you myself since I've been using their ROM as a daily driver for past weeks and I have no complaints about it)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bingkeye said:
I love Blisspop too! I have tried lots of ROMS. At the end, blisspop! Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't forget them. I respect their work.
Blisspop along with many other projects like Resurrection Remix, Euphoria OS, crDroid and many other are dependent on Archi device tree or Nameless device tree or Haxynox tree or some other (ROM source would be from respective projects).
Correct me, if I am wrong. I would definitely add them if someone from their team are working on bringing our device tree for 'M'.
Ivan_Meler said:
I didnt see his own changes at all they are just changes from other devs with his name on top..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look onto github you'll see. However, I might be wrong too.
sunny1234590 said:
Look onto github you'll see. However, I might be wrong too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once check the below post carefully.
Ivan_Meler said:
I didnt see his own changes at all they are just changes from other devs with his name on top..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You would get the answer you want if you understand the bold/underlined/italicized part.
RajashekarReddy.A said:
Once check the below post carefully.
You would get the answer you want if you understand the bold/underlined/italicized part.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Selinux M bringup commit was of which developer? Wasn't it Simon himself? :/
Romflasher69 said:
You're forgetting Bliss team and their maintainers and developers who are also working to bring marshmallow to our phone. They've done a wonderful job on blisspop (I can tell you myself since I've been using their ROM as a daily driver for past weeks and I have no complaints about it)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blisspop isn't exactly the most trustable ROM source I know. They've been caught kanging (stealing others work) many times and I'm sorry to say, but Blisspop isn't going anywhere until CM, Nameless or Haxynox do something.
Yes, it's getting a slight bit political if you're wondering.
I'm just tasting the flavor of the Marshmallow in my xt1069, but I prefer the i9300 because it's better than him (in my opinion, obviously). But, a little question about the future: can i9300 smell or taste Nutella? (I'm talking about a future Android N)
Talking about the ROM's, I feel very proud because we have so many people that don't let a device of this caliber die. Since I don't have money to donate, let me give my special thanks to all of you who don't let it go down. I'm very grateful.
moisespereira01 said:
I'm just tasting the flavor of the Marshmallow in my xt1069, but I prefer the i9300 because it's better than him (in my opinion, obviously). But, a little question about the future: can i9300 smell or taste Nutella? (I'm talking about a future Android N)
Talking about the ROM's, I feel very proud because we have so many people that don't let a device of this caliber die. Since I don't have money to donate, let me give my special thanks to all of you who don't let it go down. I'm very grateful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a broad question.
First, let us hope if we could get a usable 'M' build first.
RajashekarReddy.A said:
It's a broad question.
First, let us hope if we could get a usable 'M' build first.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Too early, right? But I think we have a nice hardware to get M. Will it have a better Ram management?
Ivan_Meler said:
That CM "Maintainer" is just using old commits from evryone else at the list and most of the time violating authorship by just squashing commits and putting his name on it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look, while I did do that, I think you'll find that it's been fixed. I'm sorry I did that, and it won't happen again.
Now, re: using old commits: did you *really* expect me to spend hours on end doing work that's already been done? It makes a lot more sense to focus on work that hasn't been done yet, rather than trying to redo everyone's work.
Now, if you have any issues with what I'm doing, feel free to PM me
Exactly! This is what my point is. And apart from that he himself is pushing some commits of his own. Make sure you guys checks at least. Yesterday there was two new commits which are not yet merged though.
Thanks a lot Simon @forkbomb444
forkbomb444 said:
Look, while I did do that, I think you'll find that it's been fixed. I'm sorry I did that, and it won't happen again.
Now, re: using old commits: did you *really* expect me to spend hours on end doing work that's already been done? It makes a lot more sense to focus on work that hasn't been done yet, rather than trying to redo everyone's work.
Now, if you have any issues with what I'm doing, feel free to PM me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure proper authorship is the only issue here
Gokulbalram said:
I'm pretty sure proper authorship is the only issue here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He did give proper authorship to developers. Check github. Anyways, just a request to all the developers please help him to get the official CM13.0 for S3 running.
Any heroes here wanna make costum kernel for tab 7 t280? or help me make one? To unlock and add governors and maybe oc
klemen241 said:
Any heroes here wanna make costum kernel for tab 7 t280? or help me make one? To unlock and add governors and maybe oc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, mate, couldn't find any. Try checking Github for any Source Codes and maybe ask @ashyx to help make it.
---------- Post added at 10:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------
klemen241 said:
Any heroes here wanna make costum kernel for tab 7 t280? or help me make one? To unlock and add governors and maybe oc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if this will help you, I found a forum of the SE-Policy patch for SM-T280 kernels
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-a/how-to/guide-root-tab-a6-t280-t3473541
ParadoXGodzillA said:
Sorry, mate, couldn't find any. Try checking Github for any Source Codes and maybe ask @ashyx to help make it.
---------- Post added at 10:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------
I'm not sure if this will help you, I found a forum of the SE-Policy patch for SM-T280 kernels
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-a/how-to/guide-root-tab-a6-t280-t3473541
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude made it for t285 but he says its totaly different for t280
I have already compiled a permissive kernel for the T280 and am using it for my TWRP builds but it seems SElinux is still giving issues, so it wont boot the OS.
As usual Samsungs source code is broken and is going to take some time to fix.
ashyx said:
I have already compiled a permissive kernel for the T280 and am using it for my TWRP builds but it seems SElinux is still giving issues, so it wont boot the OS.
As usual Samsungs source code is broken and is going to take some time to fix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is great news, if i can help in any way please tell me. Only thing missing on this tablet is costum unlocked kernel and aosp or cm
Needing a custom kernel as well. Apps2sd doesn't like the vendors dir on the stock one.
ashyx said:
I have already compiled a permissive kernel for the T280 and am using it for my TWRP builds but it seems SElinux is still giving issues, so it wont boot the OS.
As usual Samsungs source code is broken and is going to take some time to fix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are able to provide a logcat output I can probably recommend something that you can do.
want to buy this custom kernal.
Hello, do not know yet, if you open update for TAB A 7 T280 2016, your older sister TAB A 10.1 ALREADY RECEIVED OREO, thanks.