Related
Pacman rom is a combination of paranoid android , aokp and cm !! All of them great roms into one! anyone could compile or build a rom would be appreciated
gitHub link: https://github.com/PAC-man
thanks in advance
also a demonstration of the rom (on galaxy s2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PW5fRzEnyLQ
Haven't seen pacman on 4.2 yet? Probably in the works
there is a pacman for 4.2 well for xperia ray device. but i think its in works too
What about jellybam? That's got everything you said + paranoidandroid
Sent from my Paranoid Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
as far as I know anything related to PA is currently closed source till they officially finalize their 4.2 release...moles and the team are still working on it, as its in beta.
thanks pple ill look into jellybalm rom
Hi guys, long time loyal PA user and tired of waiting for them to merge ThemeManager, want to switch to any CM based rom which has PIE functionality and properly updated.
Is there any such ROM out there? Original CM will not support PIE ever, so anyone ported PA PIE to CM ?
you can try nexus 5 experience that is cm based and have slim pie , carbon but i don't know if it is cm based , and the developer of crdroid is working on a port of PIE from cm10.2 for his rom
Jeckoo said:
you can try nexus 5 experience that is cm based and have slim pie , carbon but i don't know if it is cm based , and the developer of crdroid is working on a port of PIE from cm10.2 for his rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Carbon does have PIE, but it's AOSP.
actually looking for a cm based rom because of theme manager, PA has no indication of including theme support.
Also if pie is there then it will be better, else might have to flash proper cm nightly
Sent from my Nexus 4
have you tried the app?, its pretty good
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2454531
deepayanneogi said:
actually looking for a cm based rom because of theme manager, PA has no indication of including theme support.
Also if pie is there then it will be better, else might have to flash proper cm nightly
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Liquidsmooth has pie and has theme manager. The new one..
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
deepayanneogi said:
Hi guys, long time loyal PA user and tired of waiting for them to merge ThemeManager, want to switch to any CM based rom which has PIE functionality and properly updated.
Is there any such ROM out there? Original CM will not support PIE ever, so anyone ported PA PIE to CM ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beanstalk is amazing, and has Pie, Halo, multiwindow, immersive mode, Xposed baked in, and about every other feature you can imagine... It is CM based as well... Combine it with Hells-Core kernel and PA Gapps and it is rock solid, actually even with the stock kernel it is very good. I suggest it very highly.
You won't see many updates though, maybe 4-8 per year on average, this ROM is rock solid and extremely feature packed, when updates to come out they just work though, many ROMs basically use updates like a beta program, not Beanstalk. I don't know if it has the new or old theme manager, I don't use themes so I can't tell you... but it does have a theme manager.
Thanks for the suggestions guys, just clean CM latest and it's quite good till now, I feel there is slight performance hit from PA but I will take that. CM has expanded desktop so no need of PIE any more. Was tired of PA, they still haven't managed to incorporate hybrid let alone theme manager.
Hey guys, everything is in the title, i wonder if it's possible now for SGY to have some new bases for roms ( KK AOSP, AOKP ) as CM11 is now in a nightly stage, will it be possible to make AOKP and 4.4 AOSP ?
Thanks
OxygeenHD said:
Hey guys, everything is in the title, i wonder if it's possible now for SGY to have some new bases for roms ( KK AOSP, AOKP ) as CM11 is now in a nightly stage, will it be possible to make AOKP and 4.4 AOSP ?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. But first CM11 base should be stable, then it is possible.
No ETA or something.
Sent from my GT-I9001 Gadget of Mass Destruction with CM11 using XDA Developers App.
hnkotnis said:
Yes. But first CM11 base should be stable, then it is possible.
No ETA or something.
Sent from my GT-I9001 Gadget of Mass Destruction with CM11 using XDA Developers App.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i doesn't wanted to ask any ETA, i just wanted to know if it will be possible with the recent changes on our phones ;p
OxygeenHD said:
i doesn't wanted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a great news......after the stable version of cm11 by BroadcomCM team....it'll possible.
imElectronica said:
Its a great news......after the stable version of cm11 by BroadcomCM team....it'll possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its not BroadcomCM that is building cm11 its Androidarmv6 and yeah its possible after a stable build but depends aosp is a bit difficult to build as compared to cm
What is the consensus on the CM12 nightly builds?
Is anybody using them?
I just got my 9506 and all I really want out of a rom is the stock look, like Nexus or GPE, which CM provides.
Arters version of Temasek CM12 is much better then official cm12
kornelius1982 said:
Arters version of Temasek CM12 is much better then official cm12
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the main differences? Is it suitable for use as a daily driver?
awicks said:
What are the main differences? Is it suitable for use as a daily driver?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are hard gamer, I recommend you to use official CM12. I've tested both and seems like theres serious graphical issues in arters cm12. But both are good for daily use, battery life is little bit worse in arter cm12. Theres not much differencies.
The consensus is that Temasek rom built by @arter97 is the BEST rom for our device, even better than touchwiz rom, and of course better than official cm builds.
pille1 said:
The consensus is that Temasek rom built by @arter97 is the BEST rom for our device, even better than touchwiz rom, and of course better than official cm builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not agree the official cm12 by the time will be better because of it's easier to handle, flash and has OTA update.
Can someone please explain what the main differences/goals are between the three major ROMS are? (official cm12, solk2, and arter97/temasek) Looking around the forum, I can't seem to find anything closer than "X is better than Y" and "The difference is in tuning" and other vague things like that
joshkun said:
I do not agree the official cm12 by the time will be better because of it's easier to handle, flash and has OTA update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah and they have better support to rom. I mean they update it every day etc..
Arters rom is based on temasek moded version of CM12 - it does include a bit more than the barebone CM12. It is rock solid and by far good enough to be a daily driver. I found it to be great with games (as a reply to another post here). Played Star Wars Kotor on it for hours, it ran perfectly and did not get hot.
The "official" CM12 I have not tried, but it seems to be lagging a lot behind arter. They had, or still have?, problems with wifi/mobile nettwork and other stuff. Does not seem to be a daily driver yet.
I just don't get why you guyz think that easy flashing and faster releases is a positive feature in terms of rom stability.
I'm quite happy with updates arter releases, they are stable and battery friendly, besides it have all goodies from temasek rom.
Don't wanna be a flashaholic!
I don't want to be a flashaholic either. Maybe when official gets a snapshot version, or milestone, but that may never happen looking at the history.
I was using CM11 on the previous 9505 but everything changed with Lollipop.
Genebaby said:
I don't want to be a flashaholic either. Maybe when official gets a snapshot version, or milestone, but that may never happen looking at the history.
I was using CM11 on the previous 9505 but everything changed with Lollipop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was looking very skeptic when it was available, but I was amazed how stable and fast it was.
Started with v1, I`m using arters build and had ZERO accidental restart, (FC, camera can`t connect and etc... ) or any bug that affects daily usage. I came from M12 i9300 CM11.
Does casting work? Moving apps to SD?
Casting works fine with Chromecast. Accessible from quick pulldown panel.
Move 2 sd is broken, it`s CM bug.
kornelius1982 said:
Casting works fine with Chromecast. Accessible from quick pulldown panel.
Move 2 sd is broken, it`s CM bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gotcha, the rom I was using with the 9505 did not have cast working and SD moving was also broken.
For me official cm12 is the best and always up to date. I tried mokeedev, arter, solk and back to official
I think I will try official cm12 when there is a at least a snapshot build.
What's broken in it at the moment, anything? What camera do you use?
I update daily with last nightly. For my usages nothing's broken. Very stable. I use Google camera.
Do you have a chrome cast? Can you connect to it?
Genebaby said:
Do you have a chrome cast? Can you connect to it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I have one. No problem to use it
I'll admit I get completely baffled with all the S4 variants.
1. Put simply is there a UK GT-I9505 Cyanogenmod 12 or 12.1 nightly?
2. What's device name to Cyanogenmod call it?
My GT-I9505 is from Everything Everywhere in the UK (who still haven't released lollipop).
Thanks
1. Yes.
2. jfltexx.
Perfect. Thanks.
jfltexx Snapshots stopped in February 2014 with M3. Which is weird as my LG G Pad last got a stable build in November 2014 with M12. That's a bit worrying if I want a stable/reliable CM build.
p.s. Stable being used generally. I'm aware CM used to use Stable as a specific naming convention.
bradavon said:
Perfect. Thanks.
jfltexx Snapshots stopped in February 2014 with M3. Which is weird as my LG G Pad last got a stable build in November 2014 with M12. That's a bit worrying if I want a stable/reliable CM build.
p.s. Stable being used generally. I'm aware CM used to use Stable as a specific naming convention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nightlies are more stable then the snapshots. So don't let naming misguide you. Just go for either the nightlies or the one in my signature. Ps go for the 12.1 branch, more stable then the 12 branch.
Really?
I thought the whole point was Stables were signed off?
Nightlies also updated daily which is bewildering. I just want a stable Android 5.1 release really. I'm not especially interested in the "cutting edge".
Thanks
bradavon said:
Really?
I thought the whole point was Stables were signed off?
Nightlies also updated daily which is bewildering. I just want a stable Android 5.1 release really. I'm not especially interested in the "cutting edge".
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is: a rom may work perfectly for me and for you it gives various problems.
Bugs vary from device to device.
For instance, most roms I have tried on my device have worked perfectly (Thankfully).
But I saw other people who reported various issues with the same rom.
You will have to try for yourself.
the GPE rom by Danvdh is one of the most stable roms I have tried. It's still 5.0.1 though.
Resurrection Remix with Alucard kernel also works fine for me.
You might also try FlexOS. People say it has nice battery life.
AICP was also stable for me.
SaberMod CM12.1 stable too. But haven't tried it for some time.
They are all based on CM12.1.
You might also try the official CM12.1 Optimized build.
GDReaper said:
The thing is: a rom may work perfectly for me and for you it gives various problems.
Bugs vary from device to device.
For instance, most roms I have tried on my device have worked perfectly (Thankfully).
But I saw other people who reported various issues with the same rom. You will have to try for yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd rather stick with a stable ROM that's been signed off and had some quality control applied to it for that very reason. I prefer to just install a ROM and be done with it (maybe upgrading every now and again OTA) .
Like you say otherwise you could be fine (probably) or maybe not.
GDReaper said:
You might also try the official CM12.1 Optimized build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting idea. Is this much more optimised for the S4 than the regular CM12.1 nightlies?
Being a fork isn't there a chance it'll get out of sync with the CM12.1 nightlies?
Thanks for the info on the other ROMs.
Lennyz1988 said:
Nightlies are more stable then the snapshots. So don't let naming misguide you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could someone explain how this is the case please? Thanks.
bradavon said:
I'd rather stick with a stable ROM that's been signed off and had some quality control applied to it for that very reason. I prefer to just install a ROM and be done with it (maybe upgrading every now and again OTA) .
Like you say otherwise you could be fine (probably) or maybe not.
Interesting idea. Is this much more optimised for the S4 than the regular CM12.1 nightlies?
Being a fork isn't there a chance it'll get out of sync with the CM12.1 nightlies?
Thanks for the info on the other ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The optimized builds are developed by the same developer as the nightlies for the s4. So they pretty much go head to head.
Oh nice thanks.
Do the latest CM12.1 nightlies have the ability to turn the S4 legacy Menu button into an App-Switcher button? It's irritating having to hold down the Home button to switch between apps.
Lastly, is there anything major left in CM11 not in CM12.1 now? Is there a list somewhere?
I understand missing features is one of the reasons a CM12.1 Snapshot hasn't been released.
bradavon said:
Oh nice thanks.
Do the latest CM12.1 nightlies have the ability to turn the S4 legacy Menu button into an App-Switcher button? It's irritating having to hold down the Home button to switch between apps.
Lastly, is there anything major left in CM11 not in CM12.1 now? Is there a list somewhere?
I understand missing features is one of the reasons a CM12.1 Snapshot hasn't been released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeing as android M is close development for CM12.1 will stop at some point and CM13 will start.
GDReaper said:
The thing is: a rom may work perfectly for me and for you it gives various problems.
Bugs vary from device to device.
For instance, most roms I have tried on my device have worked perfectly (Thankfully).
But I saw other people who reported various issues with the same rom.
You will have to try for yourself.
the GPE rom by Danvdh is one of the most stable roms I have tried. It's still 5.0.1 though.
Resurrection Remix with Alucard kernel also works fine for me.
You might also try FlexOS. People say it has nice battery life.
AICP was also stable for me.
SaberMod CM12.1 stable too. But haven't tried it for some time.
They are all based on CM12.1.
You might also try the official CM12.1 Optimized build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for the CM12.1 Optimized build. I had low mobile signal which resulting in big battery drain in the otherwise awesome Danvdh 5.0.1 GPE rom. Had to ditch it.
GDReaper said:
The optimized builds are developed by the same developer as the nightlies for the s4. So they pretty much go head to head.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this.
Why are the optimized builds so far behind? The latest CM12.1 optimized build for the S4 looks to be 2015-06-16 but there's a regular CM12.1 nightly dated 2015-06-25.