Database Users

Nexus One Plan *need input*

hey guys i ordered the nexus one for 529
i was wondering if my current g1 plan unlimited text and internet will work with it as soon as i plug my sim in
thanks for your input!
AND WELCOME TO THE NEXUS BABY!

did exactly that. no issues at all

Should work. Still an android data plan.

There's already a thread asking this exact same question. Next time search. As others have said, yes.

uansari1 said:
There's already a thread asking this exact same question. Next time search. As others have said, yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i actually did search thanks a lot, check how long ive been on XDA next time. so thanks but stop mini modding
now back to the subject thanks guys!

pr0cl1v1ty said:
i actually did search thanks a lot, check how long ive been on XDA next time. so thanks but stop mini modding
now back to the subject thanks guys!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I don't give a sh!t how long you've been here if you don't know how to search. Obviously your tenure doesn't really mean much, does it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=615285
As I said... your question was answered in that thread.

pr0cl1v1ty said:
hey guys i ordered the nexus one for 529
i was wondering if my current g1 plan unlimited text and internet will work with it as soon as i plug my sim in
thanks for your input!
AND WELCOME TO THE NEXUS BABY!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this won't work.
You just wasted your $529.
Sorry man.

uansari1 said:
Yeah, I don't give a sh!t how long you've been here if you don't know how to search. Obviously your tenure doesn't really mean much, does it.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=615285
As I said... your question was answered in that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ive been here longer then you bub, and im not trying to start anything.
and thanks for the sarcasim bro

pr0cl1v1ty said:
ive been here longer then you bub, and im not trying to start anything.
and thanks for the sarcasim bro
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look, Bub. Who cares if you've been here longer than I have? Clearly it doesn't make you smarter. You tried calling me out for suggesting you search, then I posted the other thread that you claimed didn't exist. You make me laugh. Now drop it... your question has been answered. I'll get out of your thread now.

Children! Children! Please! Yes we know he should have search. He said he did and found nothing. He could have just as easily said that he did not try and it would have made no difference.
@uansari1 Calm the **** down, theres more people to blame for being guilty of this than just him. And there are bigger things to be *****in' about than just this. RELAX
@pr0cl1v1ty Yes the sim will work just fine, just take it out of your g1 and place in Nexus One. You dont even have to alert tmobile, it will work as soon as it is placed inside.
@Paul22000 Was that really neccesary? Dont forget that plain text cannot correctly display voice. And an ignorant newbie randomly searching the forums could come into this thread and be misinformed by your statement.

I'm on the no contract 500 min/unlim text/unlim data for $60 before my work discount annnd new to Tmo. No complaints so far
Also... Enough with the search comments... it gets rather childish.

Blueman101 said:
Children! Children! Please! Yes we know he should have search. He said he did and found nothing. He could have just as easily said that he did not try and it would have made no difference.
@uansari1 Calm the **** down, theres more people to blame for being guilty of this than just him. And there are bigger things to be *****in' about than just this. RELAX
@pr0cl1v1ty Yes the sim will work just fine, just take it out of your g1 and place in Nexus One. You dont even have to alert tmobile, it will work as soon as it is placed inside.
@Paul22000 Was that really neccesary? Dont forget that plain text cannot correctly display voice. And an ignorant newbie randomly searching the forums could come into this thread and be misinformed by your statement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks man for the consideration.

[Q] Root Block: Intentional or Bug?

Cyanogen is saying its a bug. Tmo is saying its a feature. which one is correct?
If it is indeed a bug how would tmo go about fixing our phones? mass recall? sweep under the rug?
If its a feature, is it a precursor to what future phones will be?
Either outcome isnt very good for the consumer and may lead to lots of lost customers for tmo. Specially after tmo releasing a statement that its a feature of the phone.
I love this phone, the very first smartphone i ever had, and was really looking forward to hacking around with it but its hard to justify such a device that locks you out of such features. I hope cyanogen and all the other great devs work out a solution to this problem. I dont want to send it back.
looked for similar threads and couldnt find any.
info link:
h**p://phandroid.com/2010/10/11/cyanogen-calls-shenanigans-on-t-mobile-g2-root-fail-safe-mechanism/

Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!

d0nkey said:
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This......

SuperFly03 said:
This......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely this.

I read all post lol, but I need to do this question, Im always an Iphone user (tmobile network) I bought this G2, I keep reading that cant be root for now, I change it today because got blackout twices....
I dont know what the hell works the root thing.. Just an advices, should keep my G2? or wait for another android phone...
Still have 13 days for return

d0nkey said:
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
care to elaborate?

s30zgt said:
care to elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you? lol...

AndroidNoober said:
Can you? lol...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off learn to type in a understandable format. your previous post just butchers the english language.
Second, i can see that this thread will go nowhere. Mod can you please close this thread?

s30zgt said:
First off learn to type in a understandable format. your previous post just butchers the english language.
Second, i can see that this thread will go nowhere. Mod can you please close this thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I know my English is bad.. Is my second language.. I just trying to understand a little bit about this.. Spanish pages are from Mexico or Spain, harder to understand!!!
Like I said, sorry about that.

s30zgt said:
care to elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, here: Read the ****ing internet.

krayshunist said:
Sure, here: Read the ****ing internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks man lol. I don't need your asinine comments that bring nothing to this thread. Mods please close this thread.

Wow... ppl are such asses..i dont see anything in here that warrants the op to be cursed at...ridiculous
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

People are being jerks for sure, but OP, you should search better cuz your question has been answered in several threads. The short of it is NO. It is not a bug in the sense you are thinking. It is an intentional bug which tricks linux (android os) into thinking writes to the system files during root are being made when in actuality, the writes are only being written to cache. Once the cache is cleared during reboot the root access is erased because it wasn't actually written to the system in the first place. It's not a bug that needs to be fixed. It's a bug that was placed there to fool the system and make permanent root more...challenging.

Wiki
s30zgt said:
Cyanogen is saying its a bug. Tmo is saying its a feature. which one is correct?
If it is indeed a bug how would tmo go about fixing our phones? mass recall? sweep under the rug?
If its a feature, is it a precursor to what future phones will be?
Either outcome isnt very good for the consumer and may lead to lots of lost customers for tmo. Specially after tmo releasing a statement that its a feature of the phone.
I love this phone, the very first smartphone i ever had, and was really looking forward to hacking around with it but its hard to justify such a device that locks you out of such features. I hope cyanogen and all the other great devs work out a solution to this problem. I dont want to send it back.
looked for similar threads and couldnt find any.
info link:
h**p://phandroid.com/2010/10/11/cyanogen-calls-shenanigans-on-t-mobile-g2-root-fail-safe-mechanism/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a very informational Wiki out. Check it out. It will get you up to date with all the work that has been done towards root.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/wiki/index.php?title=HTC_Vision#Rooting_the_G2

The important part of the question.. for me.. is whether the Z has the same bugFeature.
I see one random user saying that they flashed a G2 rom on a Desire Z and nothing more. Have I missed something? Kinda hard to say yay or nay based solely on that.

"Intentional Bug" ????
If it's intentional, it's NOT a bug.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App

Thank you XfooYen for the info. I did a quick search before I posted(the posting page even searches similar post before you publish them) and found nothing similar. I will make sure to search more thoroughly next time.
I am familiar with the current situation with root, I just though that if a well known developer like cyanogen thinks that its a bug that maybe the readers of xda might want to discuss his possible ratonale for such a statement, then again that may not have been what he was trying to say and got it misrepresented by the media. Instead I saw nothing but irrelevent and pointless posts. For a second I thought this was gizmodo or engadget.
Thank you again. Its good to know that xda has readers who actually know what they are talking about and not just the average troll.

androidtoy09 said:
"Intentional Bug" ????
If it's intentional, it's NOT a bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, you're wrong.
RT @cyanogen: @garok89 yeah, and the statement tmobile made is technically wrong. theres nothing that restores the phone, its actually what i'd call a bug

greengoldmello said:
Wow... ppl are such asses..i dont see anything in here that warrants the op to be cursed at...ridiculous
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. This is XDA. In the years I've been here, there was never this much flaming and douchery as there has been lately.

What happened with the dump from the Unbranded/Dev/Test Device? Da_G?

Just wondered if there were any updates as to what was up with that one guys dev device that was unbranded and did have HSUPA enabled? Did you guys get a system dump and poke through it yet?

I was wondering the same thing. Agreed that things like these don't happen overnight, but the suspense is killing me. I hope Da_G and gang haven't given up on Atrix like some other devs.

Sorry if this is incorrect but I believe that design gears said he gave up on the attic in the thread where he posted the retail sbf
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Techcruncher said:
Sorry if this is incorrect but I believe that design gears said he gave up on the attic in the thread where he posted the retail sbf
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Da_G and DesignGears are 2 different people

Pirateghost said:
Da_G and DesignGears are 2 different people
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But Design Gears was a huge factor in any development done with the Atrix so far so having him gone is like a kick in the face.

If there is progress everyone will know, no need to ask about it...
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

jug6ernaut said:
If there is progress everyone will know, no need to ask about it...
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No reason we can't be curious. Its not like we're asking for something to be developed or an ETA on anything... just wondering whats up with it.

leadguy68 said:
No reason we can't be curious. Its not like we're asking for something to be developed or an ETA on anything... just wondering whats up with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol let me put out this way...if something like this were to happen... do u really think this forum wouldn't explode with info about out?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

jug6ernaut said:
Lol let me put out this way...if something like this were to happen... do u really think this forum wouldn't explode with info about out?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know my head would probably explode....

Well i will add some information for you guys then...
Da_G does have a dump from a Dev Atrix that had a unlocked bootloader and hsupa enabled. He attempted to write(not flash) the unlocked bootloader to a locked atrix. The write was successful. but upon further inspection it appears that moto(unsurprisingly) has this area write protected. He did successfully write it(as he read the data back byte for bye and it was the same as written) but it appears that the data is mapped to another section of nand.
This as as far as hes gotten right now, i do not know what he is currently attempting.

jug6ernaut said:
Lol let me put out this way...if something like this were to happen... do u really think this forum wouldn't explode with info about out?
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fair enough Hope you didnt take my comment the wrong way.

jug6ernaut said:
Well i will add some information for you guys then...
Da_G does have a dump from a Dev Atrix that had a unlocked bootloader and hsupa enabled. He attempted to write(not flash) the unlocked bootloader to a locked atrix. The write was successful. but upon further inspection it appears that moto(unsurprisingly) has this area write protected. He did successfully write it(as he read the data back byte for bye and it was the same as written) but it appears that the data is mapped to another section of nand.
This as as far as hes gotten right now, i do not know what he is currently attempting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly the sort of info i was wondering about. Thanks for the update. Lets hope something comes of it!
If not, i applaud Da_G for trying and risking his device.

leadguy68 said:
Exactly the sort of info i was wondering about. Thanks for the update. Lets hope something comes of it!
If not, i applaud Da_G for trying and risking his device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To everyone reading this i suggest Donating to Da_G, while we can swear anything will come from it, little incentives dont hurt lol. I already have lol.

jug6ernaut said:
To everyone reading this i suggest Donating to Da_G, while we can swear anything will come from it, little incentives dont hurt lol. I already have lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats a good idea and if he breaks his device we should start a donation fund to get him another

jug6ernaut said:
To everyone reading this i suggest Donating to Da_G, while we can swear anything will come from it, little incentives dont hurt lol. I already have lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a bounty thread already, should be enough as of now to buy a new atrix if im not mistaken. Its only going to get bigger...pretty good incentive. Id be shooting for it if i knew anything more than a few adb commands..

Guys what happen g00h roms?

Guys all the g00h threads are disabled why? What happen to him?

Nope
As i can tell threads are there. Are you sure about that?
For example
forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-3/development/rom-t2891226

lmix said:
As i can tell threads are there. Are you sure about that?
For example
forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-3/development/rom-t2891226
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep all threads are locked and his account was disabled

strange
1Ishara said:
Yep all threads are locked and his account was disabled
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wow you are right.. Would like to know also...

lmix said:
wow you are right.. Would like to know also...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1Ishara said:
Yep all threads are locked and his account was disabled
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Two developers are gone because xda management get rid of them for not publicised reasons.
The reason is not so important as the fact they good work is out of this forum.
Even they stopped here you can find they work which is continue out of this place.

Gizmundo said:
Two developers are gone because xda management get rid of them for not publicised reasons.
The reason is not so important as the fact they good work is out of this forum.
Even they stopped here you can find they work which is continue out of this place.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dunno who is second dev but g00h really had some impresive work which was very good and unique to my opinion , and whatever the reason is it is maybe kinda harsh decision to just block someone just like that who spent a lot of time making this forum even more popular.. Sad but true..
Btw thnx for clearing that up

lmix said:
Dunno who is second dev but g00h really had some impresive work which was very good and unique to my opinion , and whatever the reason is it is maybe kinda harsh decision to just block someone just like that who spent a lot of time making this forum even more popular.. Sad but true..
Btw thnx for clearing that up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes accepted.. I think now xda froget about the community.... We are coming here because of the people not because of the community name.. Cyanogenmod become inc.. Any plan xda?

Gentlemen, do not keep your claims to XDA dev g00h only because he has left us all assuming your own forum for selected people.

waldemarz said:
Gentlemen, do not keep your claims to XDA dev g00h only because he has left us all assuming your own forum for selected people.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you a link to the forum please?

It would be really sad if G00h is really gone. Does g00h has a social media account or something with maybe some more background information?

I will not get into why he was banned as it is no ones concern but the mod teams and the banned user. All I will say is that he earned it. And for those that think it was very unique, it really wasnt.
You have to remember this is a developer forum. Not a rom site. Not a place to come and make your phone cool.
Nuff said.

Where are the ROMs?

This might be a dumb question, but i'm quite certain i'm not the only one wondering. Is anyone working on any ROMs for the v20? I know jc cracked root and recovery fairly quickly. Is anyone working on any roms? I'd love to test out Cyan ....its been years.

Pretty sure LG hasn't released the source code yet, and we still don't have the dll needed for unbricking using LGup. It's only been a month since the phone was released, chill.

I think once we get a way to flash tot/kdz people will be more willing to experiment.

slayerh4x said:
I think once we get a way to flash tot/kdz people will be more willing to experiment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, got ya. I'm not in a hurry, i just didn't know exactly what the roadblock was, or if there was one. That makes more sense now.

trobertson said:
Pretty sure LG hasn't released the source code yet, and we still don't have the dll needed for unbricking using LGup. It's only been a month since the phone was released, chill.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do people always do this? Did i sound desperate? I was just asking a simple question...isnt that what forums are for??

thatisandwas said:
Why do people always do this? Did i sound desperate? I was just asking a simple question...isnt that what forums are for??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't speak for anyone other than myself,but,it's generally considered rude/needy asking for ROMS & ETA's for such.If you don't believe me take a look around XDA & the rules for all who enter here.
Seriously,only one model has an unlockable bootloader ATM & it has only been available officially since 10/28/16.
On top of that,Android 7.0 is a new OS with only a handful of phones running it,so,you may wanna temper your expectations for development a bit............................

mods delete
---------- Post added at 03:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:42 PM ----------
thatisandwas said:
Why do people always do this? Did i sound desperate? I was just asking a simple question...isnt that what forums are for??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The no ETAs rule. Posted everywhere and consistently broken.
KOLIOSIS said:
I can't speak for anyone other than myself,but,it's generally considered rude/needy asking for ROMS & ETA's for such.If you don't believe me take a look around XDA & the rules for all who enter here.
Seriously,only one model has an unlockable bootloader ATM & it has only been available officially since 10/28/16.
On top of that,Android 7.0 is a new OS with only a handful of phones running it,so,you may wanna temper your expectations for development a bit............................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. Patience is a virtue. Instant gratification is childish. If you want a ROM right now, start developing it yourself.

trobertson said:
mods delete
---------- Post added at 03:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:42 PM ----------
The no ETAs rule. Posted everywhere and consistently broken.
This. Patience is a virtue. Instant gratification is childish. If you want a ROM right now, start developing it yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Perhaps you can show me where i asked for an ETA??? Seriously though, i'm not trying to be rude or demand anything. I simply asked if anyone was WORKING on roms. I didn't say "WHEN IS THIS COMING OUT?!" or anything like that. Delete it if you want, i was just curious to see if/what people were working. Someone above nicely informed me that certain software was needed before anyone could start developing, which makes sense.
What doesn't make sense, is calling me childish, selfish, etc, for asking if anyone is developing anything. It's so ridiculous that i can't ask a simple question without people jumping down my throat. I've been on this forum for almost 10 years and it didn't used to be like this.

LG is not a very popular brand that does not attract devs. Even the Pixel doesn't even have roms. The days of roms are numbered sadly.
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

thatisandwas said:
Ah, got ya. I'm not in a hurry, i just didn't know exactly what the roadblock was, or if there was one. That makes more sense now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
JCadduono, the guy who gave us root shell and TWRP, is working on getting Kali Nethunter rom working right now. He is really good and I know he will get it working.

slayerh4x said:
JCadduono, the guy who gave us root shell and TWRP, is working on getting Kali Nethunter rom working right now. He is really good and I know he will get it working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds awesome. This is the kind of response i was asking for. Thanks man!

thatisandwas said:
That sounds awesome. This is the kind of response i was asking for. Thanks man!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NP, if you find out about any others let me know.

I understand that the second screen caused problems in the V10 development. That'll likely be an issue with this phone as well.

thatisandwas said:
This might be a dumb question, but i'm quite certain i'm not the only one wondering. Is anyone working on any ROMs for the v20? I know jc cracked root and recovery fairly quickly. Is anyone working on any roms? I'd love to test out Cyan ....its been years.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You more than likely aren't going to see a cyanogen rom, they still don't have a working one for the v10... The second screen kills it...
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk

People I think a quick no or explanation of the phone is too new would of just been fair instead of bashing the guy. The OMG don't ask for eta's rule doesn't really come in to play here
Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk

slayerh4x said:
JCadduono, the guy who gave us root shell and TWRP, is working on getting Kali Nethunter rom working right now. He is really good and I know he will get it working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, thats all the OP wants to know. As do I and many others. IS someone working on a ROM etc.. No ETAs ... This guy seems to be working on something also .. http://forum.xda-developers.com/v20/development/v20-v1-oct-20-16-t3482986

Here's my take on it. For one why would anyone buy a device like this to put cm on it? Like seriously that would be just silly. That's what nexus devices are for! I highly doubt there will be many roms that aren't just the standard stock debloated/deodexed. And those aren't even features. My advice is stay stock and use xposed if it comes out. I highly doubt there's gonna be any ground breaking features added to any rom.

Plus all the devs are switching to iPhones now! lol
Sent from my LG-H811 using Tapatalk

dark jedi66 said:
People I think a quick no or explanation of the phone is too new would of just been fair instead of bashing the guy. The OMG don't ask for eta's rule doesn't really come in to play here
Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phones has officially been out 19 days and the resources needed for custom Roms aren't available. Tag this in the first world impatient problem bin. Geez.