The following are rules for Original Development:
Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them
Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.
A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.
Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.
Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.
Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)
The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:
Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favourite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.
Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.
Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.
Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.
A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.
A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Related
Hello,
If anyone needs a banner for their Rom, i can help.
PM me details if you like. I am happy to try and help out.
Please post the link to your rom.
I have skills with Photoshop.
MY PREVIOUS BANNERS PROJECTS:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
For the amazing Dilidroid Rom - personally one of my favourites. Looks stunning.
Check out the thread or try the rom? http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1717883
MY CURRENT BANNERS PROJECTS:
Wanamlite
Thanks,
Denemga
reserved
Good move on putting yourself out there, but may I add something? If you're looking for work, paid or otherwise, don't limit yourself. By asking for only "ROMs or threads that are well known or have some decent amount of views/users", you're setting yourself up to fail. I can almost guarantee you that any large development project already has it's graphic taken care of. Instead, why not offer your services to smaller/less known devs? Not only is this good because a) you actually stand a chance of finding work, but also b) because, whether we like to admit it or not, we as people are shallow; we base things off the face value. We do judge books by their covers, both consciously and subconsciously. You can have the best ROM in all the lands, partnered with the fastest, smoothest kernel that delivers crazy battery life, but if you've got banners, etc. done up in MS Paint, you're guaranteed to instantly lose a tonne of potential users.
I can't tell you how many times I've left a thread thirty seconds after viewing it, because the banners, logos, text, and everything is simply downright hideous. If reflects, if you can't even bother to make your work look good, what does that say about your effort in your development? At the same time, I've tried a lot of different ROMs, kernels and apps simply based off their looks/screenshots/logos, etc..
Try to get over who you want to work for, and start thinking about who would accept your work.
screamworks
more in development
Hi there
I have made this thread because the differences between the Roms around are not quite clear to me. I am now on Auras2.7 (LB) I like it a lot but I am wondering about the differences between stock based custom roms for our XZ's. Is it only theming or has anyone noticed any (big) differences?
Furthermore, are Auras mods like circle battery, metalic animated backgroud etc compatible with other roms? These mods are the only reason I hesitate to try other Roms out. Before Auras I was on KA till his first XZ was broken, but now Auras bought a HTC One all chances are open for a new favourite .
Any thoughts? Please share your opinion and your experiences in comparison to other Roms.
ps. Switching between roms is nothing personal I am very grateful for all the nice stuff these developers bring to our devices:good:
Comparison of ROMs is not allowed in XDA as far as i know.
It's always better to check the available ROMs in the Development section and see what suits you best. If it's about the working MODs only then may be fine, let's not go the performance issue.
auni said:
Comparison of ROMs is not allowed in XDA as far as i know.
It's always better to check the available ROMs in the Development section and see what suits you best. If it's about the working MODs only then may be fine, let's not go the performance issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not see what's wrong with sharing feedback and compare roms with eachother as long as everyone is respectful and grateful to the developers. Some people like to have powerfull roms, some like a long lasting battery and to some the aesthetics are the most important what's wrong with discussions about that? I think such a thread can be very usefull for end-users as they don't have to try any rom (there are quite a few atm luckily) and for developers because they get more objective end-user feedback and know what is most important to them. If it is not allowed and anyone have a good explanation for it I will remove this thread or mods can remove it if they like.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nextbit Baton offers several benefits to users, including:
Sync: Keeps apps and data in sync across multiple devices, allowing users to move fluidly from one device to the next without missing a beat.
Pass: Send any open app in its current state to another device, saving time and eliminating the tedious process of manually finding and opening apps on different devices.
Backup and restore: Save apps and data to your Nextbit profile in the cloud, so you can always get your apps back on any device.
Nextbit’s private beta is exclusively on CyanogenMod, the leading open-source, community-driven Android OS backed by Cyanogen Inc. The future public release of Nextbit will be available first on the commercially distributed Cyanogen operating system.
“Cyanogen continues to reimagine Android by introducing bold new firsts,” said Kirt McMaster, CEO of Cyanogen. “Nextbit represents one of these platform firsts that could only manifest on a truly open Android. We enable Baton to become a native OS level feature, creating huge benefit for our users.”
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
About: https://nextbit.com/about/
Press Release: https://nextbit.com/press/
Articles and videos
The Verge: http://www.theverge.com/2014/10/27/7079623/this-is-nextbits-try-at-fixing-app-switching-on-android
Engadget: http://www.engadget.com/2014/10/27/nextbit-baton-continuity-for-android/
Android Police: http://www.androidpolice.com/2014/1...nogenmod-with-app-syncing-backup-and-restore/
This looks intriguing! I'll be keeping an eye on this. Thanks Nextbit!
WEM97 said:
This looks intriguing! I'll be keeping an eye on this. Thanks Nextbit!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was actually an Alpha tester (can come out and say that officially now). It really is awesome and rather useful.
Nburnes said:
I was actually an Alpha tester (can come out and say that officially now). It really is awesome and rather useful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol me too. That NDA was scary. Glad I can finally talk.
Same Here, been testing it for the past 2 months. now i am just using the nextbit app on PA.
Hey guys glad to see one of us has posted to xda already, I'm about to quote Nburns and spread the word on the nexus 5 forum also just saying those alpha shirts are so soft <3
The following are rules for Original Development:
Official releases of highly original and upstream custom ROMs (built from the ground up with significant original development within them
Official releases/development of such original ROMs, perhaps posted by the maintainer or their nominated person.
A significant “first” in development for a device. Significant is subjective, but it is likely something which took considerable time/effort, and is generally accepted by developers to be significant and non-trivial.
Kernels which are built with beneficial changes that are not simply pulled from other kernels already available. Some element of original work is expected.
Tools and utilities with a clear purpose, and which are well-made, and useful to users. They should have an element of originality, either in purpose or through significant improvement in the means of operation.
Significant port of a ROM from one device to another, giving enhanced features or functionality to users of the target device. The port should be beneficial (a port from two virtually identical devices isn’t original development, it’s winzipping, and nobody really benefits from this, as it’s not development)
The following are most likely not “Original Development”, and should be posted in the “Android Development” subforum:
Your own “unofficial” stock build of your favourite original, source-built (or otherwise) ROM, particularly where an official or maintainer-endorsed thread exists already.
Minor derivatives of other ROMs with little or no changes, or ROMs consisting of “placebo” features as a main constituent or claim.
Renames or rebadges of others’ work – these don’t belong on XDA at all! Refer to rule 12 for more information.
Reposts of existing ROMs with small changes (i.e. kitchen work, such as adding a couple of apps). If you could realistically distribute your changes as an “addon pack” above and beyond a ROM, you should do so. In addition, your “ROM” would not be original development as it would be substantially identical to the original ROM.
A thread created with unrealistic goals that are clearly unachievable by those starting the thread. This is not intended to discourage high aspirations, rather to prevent threads porting Windows Phone 8 to the HTC Wallaby. This is pretty much common sense.
A ROM where a main or significant claim/feature is graphical changes to the user interface (ie. Themed ROM)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hello everyone,
I'll choose my next phone based on its compatibility with OmniROM.
What's the best phone supported by OmniROM?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
david.lynch said:
Hello everyone,
I'll choose my next phone based on its compatibility with OmniROM.
What's the best phone supported by OmniROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nexus devices are usually a good bet. Sometimes someone winds up asleep at the wheel and we fail to update them, but there is rarely much work needed so they get supported fairly well anyway.
Honestly that's it for now - Sony has a lot of potential, but until we get camera HALs compatible with Sony AOSP (there is work being done at Sony on this, but it's taking a while - lawyers and all that) they're a no-go for most people. Also, Sony devices are inconsistently supported by Omni simply because Sony releases TOO MANY DAMN DEVICES (their 6-month flagship cycle is stupid/idiotic) and many of their phones are simply unavailable in the countries our maintainers reside in.
Oppo used to be strongly recommended, but they've been doing an extremely poor job of community support since the November Github Fiasco (when they took down kernel source for all their devices, and when it finally came back up, some devices were missing and it now takes 2-3 months of pestering them for them to drop source for new devices.)
I'm personally working on Sonys right now, but I've been really spending a lot less time on Android lately than in the past. We've had quite a few members of the team semi-burnout unfortunately.
Entropy512 said:
Oppo used to be strongly recommended, but they've been doing an extremely poor job of community support since the November Github Fiasco (when they took down kernel source for all their devices, and when it finally came back up, some devices were missing and it now takes 2-3 months of pestering them for them to drop source for new devices.)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a bummer. I'm still looking for the Holy Grail of a dual-SIM phone that supports Band 12 (T-Mo 700A). They were getting close...