I have run a variety of benchmarks on OnePlusOne to check its performance. Here you can find the results.
00:23 Antutu
01:03 GFXBench
01:30 Quadrant
01:49 Vellamo
02:31 3DMark
Thanks for the contribution... But please go here for further information and discussion...http://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-one/general/oneplus-antutu-benchmark-results-t2818245
Related
This is just a thread so we can post our quadrant scores.
Highest score will be edited in to this first post.
also a question if you can answer. Why can the nexus s clocked at 1.544ghz score 5000+ on quadrant but we struggle to hit 3000 clocked at 2ghz?
link to video to prove it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cAOvEmeriFs
Not to burst your bubble or anything but Quadrant scores have been proven to be useless.
how?
Which would be the best benchmark app to use? Everyone says the same thing about quadrant :S
The I/O testing is flawed and the results don't represent real life.Phones with low Quadrant score can feel smoother than phones with higher Quadrant score eg. Xperia Play vs Galaxy S.
Random.Guy said:
The I/O testing is flawed and the results don't represent real life.Phones with low Quadrant score can feel smoother than phones with higher Quadrant score eg. Xperia Play vs Galaxy S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True
I always thought that the quatrent scores reflected how fast you could MAKE the phone go at optimal conditions... Why can't people just syandardize what you do before you test the phone and leave it at that?
sent from my Experia Play
Random.Guy said:
The I/O testing is flawed and the results don't represent real life.Phones with low Quadrant score can feel smoother than phones with higher Quadrant score eg. Xperia Play vs Galaxy S.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is SO true. When I had my Evo 3d I ran SenselessROM and it felt to be the fastest rom available, but obtained the lowest scores. Didn't make sense at all.
Hi,
I want to present my benchmark based on Unity3d, which was created to show "real" score for your device
saying "real" I mean scores which your device deserve, for example huge resolution and decent gpu is much worse than tiny resolution with slower gpu
results can browsed online:
utest.site44.com
and copy-paste from market:
uTest is advanced benchmark based on the most popular mobile platform - Unity3d
uTest will tell you how good your device in gaming, what experience you will get from games and decision will be based on your device specs (huge resolution but decent GPU... good, but not for gaming!)
uTest will perform bunch of tests on your device and will give it a score in 3 categories - overall performance, CPU and GPU scores
uTest includes following tests:
- physics based CPU tests
- lighting tests
- GPU fillrate tests
- character rendering tests
- terrain rendering test
more tests are coming...
uTest includes Ads because Ads is a part of 90% of apps on every mobile platform so real test should test everything in real environment and also Ads will allow me to keep uTest up, running and updating
ARMv6 (with VFP) and ARMv7 supported
* please note that your device results may vary because there is other apps running in background
Market link:
*not able to post a link to Market, but you can find it there by "uTest" or "uTest Benchmark" request*
Going to try now on my Nexus S!! Probably won't have such a good score...
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
---------- Post added at 11:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:37 PM ----------
I got 12063
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
now results can be browsed online:
utest.site44.com
Are my scores correct for my stock M8, in high developer mode i get a score with antutu x of 44713 it is and in antutu my score is 44696. Then not being in high developer mode in antutu x i get a score of 44959 and in antutu a score of 44850. Reason i am asking is, this handset is a new replacement handset. Now the score on my old stock handset from what i remember was 35000. Thoughts people ?
Thread closed at OP's request.
Many thanks,
Ghost
Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.
How did u get over 47k in antutu?
Geekbench isn't really a good source at the moment. It is limited to 32-bit, so it can't utilize the full potential of the SoC.
They need to release a 64-bit compliant version to really be able to run the tests correctly.
elkay said:
Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not BM mine yet but based on those numbers.... WOW!!!!
I am also considering the price of the phone vs the scores when I say that.
The S6 comes in at nearly 68k on Antutu but the 48k score still puts this phone in the current top 10.
ze551ml antutu test :
Also...
Antutu: 48475
Was wondering if anyone could post their android 9 geekbench score (snapdragon) so I could compared it to Android 10 I will post my score shortly.