Related
I want to try developing for the DSTL1 / N21
There are quite a few interesting things we can do...
Success has been been seen by xda-devs such as JesusFreke, Amon_RA, Haykuro, and Cyanogen (yes there others) in the field of Android ROMs. The ground work is there, porting and developing can commence.
Why do this?
Current ROM 1.5 - has many problems...
Unofficial ROM 1.6 - is a GREAT improvement, but makes one hungry for something better...
It would be awesome to have some success in this field. I know this device is capable of so much more, but I believe the implementation of the system is the issue. This is not the phone developers fault, as they have their own company agenda, but we could improve our own performance and satisfaction .
For example, my device (1.6 rooted) lags with having only ~50% CPU utilization and ~50MB RAM free...
Overclocking (i mean forcing full CPU capacity - 624Mhz) the CPU has barely helped and only aided battery drain...
Relevant comparison of G1 vs DSTL1 (N21) are
RAM - G1: 192MB vs DSTL1: 128MB
CPU - G1: 528Mhz vs DSTL1: 624Mhz
These specification comparisons say that G1 can run a better ROM than DSTL1? I don't think so. DSTL1 only loses in RAM, which can be made up for using swap!
Devs had success with techniques using: App2SD, swap, ext3, and BFS (faster file system). I believe we could do something impressive here! There are pros and cons to this.
Developers and Testers would be needed. A team of 5 developers and a few testers should be able to get us on the right track. We would definitely need Linux experience, or the desire and ability to soak up all the info on Google
A Linux kernel is a must for this phone, we would have to compile our own... It would be nice to preserve DUAL SIM, but in reality we might have to give up this luxury, as it is proprietary code, unless a new ROM is made backwards compatible (which is possible).
Cyanogen's Github is available for knowledge osmosis http://github.com/cyanogen
A DSTL1 Recovery by Amon_RA (based on Cyanogen's Recovery) is already in Beta...
Cool things are possible. Could I find some developers willing to donate their free time?
Please limit responses to dev talk.
reserved for later
crzyruski,
Believe it or not the very luxury you talk about giving up(dual sim) is the reason why may of us bother to buy these phones(DSTL1\N21) in the first place. Other wise we might as well go with a mainstream phone such as hero etc.
chrismotto said:
crzyruski,
Believe it or not the very luxury you talk about giving up(dual sim) is the reason why may of us bother to buy these phones(DSTL1\N21) in the first place. Other wise we might as well go with a mainstream phone such as hero etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a possibility that I'm not going to ignore, so I stated it.
The point is that the current OS is lacking. Initially we would want to port and learn from porting of the quality ROMs available now. Those obviously don't support dual-SIM.
Progress needs to start from somewhere. When someone releases a new port or ROM not all pieces work... look at the Eclair (2.0) port, half the features don't work!
If enough heads came together we could probably retain dual-SIM, common this is linux and I've seen the most amazing development come to realization. I just need the teamwork because it might take me a whole year in my spare time...
Having a kernel working
Hi,
the most important IMHO is having a kernel working, built from sources.
Obviously, some closed source drivers must be rewritten, notably the NXP5209 (the GSM modem), if we want the device to be useful (i.e. if we want to make phone call).
My first attempt of booting with a custom kernel was unsucessfull (black screen), which brings to the second point: the lack of some sort of console for kernel debuging.
Any idea regarding the NXP? Anyone is aware of some opensource driver or specs?
Any idea also regarding kernel debugging in the N21/DSTL1?
sfabris
@sfabris
I will try to find info for the questions you have.
My initial work will be to make an emulator so we can test on PC and not our devices (because we need them functional for every day life )
Have you checked out how other modders have done kernel modifications?
Namely JF and Cyanogen?
I can't begin to comprehend so I'm glad you took the initiative with this.
Lets make some progress
sfabris said:
Obviously, some closed source drivers must be rewritten, notably the NXP5209 (the GSM modem), if we want the device to be useful (i.e. if we want to make phone call).
Any idea regarding the NXP? Anyone is aware of some opensource driver or specs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe we have it all wrong???? Maybe its PNX?
PDA DB reports DSTL1 as having Nexperia PNX5209 (ARM946) Phone Controller.
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=1714&view=1&c=general_mobile_dstl1
A similar Android with this phone controller is WayteQ X-Phone (TechFaith Lancer)
http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=specs&id=1801&view=1&c=wayteq_x-phone_android_techfaith_lancer
crzyruski said:
@sfabris
Have you checked out how other modders have done kernel modifications?
Namely JF and Cyanogen?
I can't begin to comprehend so I'm glad you took the initiative with this.
Lets make some progress
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm forced to HTC G1 until I'll wait the replacement for my N21 I'll go in detail on the kernel boot process on other hardware.
A fast way to test kernel in our every day device is kexec which should work also on ARM.
sfabris said:
A fast way to test kernel in our every day device is kexec which should work also on ARM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as I understand, kexec is a program that can run a new kernel on the fly...
So I could try a new kernel right from my device without reflashing?
have you tried this? Or is this still theory?
crzyruski said:
As far as I understand, kexec is a program that can run a new kernel on the fly...
So I could try a new kernel right from my device without reflashing?
have you tried this? Or is this still theory?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried it on x86, never on arm.
Support is there also for arm, but this not imply that also the Marvell PXA is supported.
It's basically the same way of booting Android from WM via haret.
Fastest way to boot your new kernel or to crash your machine
I have created an emulator.
FYI, LCD density should be 120.
Edit: Technically the density is 133...
files prevent recovery-RA-DSTL1-v1.2.3 from loading
I have been wrestling with the beta recovery-RA-DSTL1-v1.2.3
Amon_RA retrofitted his own recovery image to work for the DSTL1 (N21)...
IT HAS AWESOME POTENTIAL.
Currently ADB RECOVERY SHELL + ROOT is the only thing that is functional.
But I haven't been able to get in touch with him to continue work on it.
The following files prevent me from booting into RA's Recovery, so I remove them:
- e2fsck
- mke2fs
- parted
- tune2fs
Once I am in ADB RECOVERY SHELL I can push them back on and do what I need to do.
Unfortunately the changes are persistent so if I were to reboot and try Recovery Mode again, it won't load
What is so special about those four programs that prevent my recovery from loading?????
is there any ways to update the firmware of N21
hi,
i'm just buy a sciphone n21 (actually is already in our office for 2 weeks but find it now:-( )
and i've to face myself in a situation that i can't use this phone:-( since i buy this phone because:
- i assume that google apps auto sync contact and calendars. unfortunately this phone has not google apps by default.
- and has dual sim support.
so my question: is there any way to upgrade it to a firmware which support is?
can i do anything to use my phone?
thanks in advance.
regards.
crzyruski said:
I have been wrestling with the beta recovery-RA-DSTL1-v1.2.3
Amon_RA retrofitted his own recovery image to work for the DSTL1 (N21)...
IT HAS AWESOME POTENTIAL.
Currently ADB RECOVERY SHELL + ROOT is the only thing that is functional.
But I haven't been able to get in touch with him to continue work on it.
The following files prevent me from booting into RA's Recovery, so I remove them:
- e2fsck
- mke2fs
- parted
- tune2fs
Once I am in ADB RECOVERY SHELL I can push them back on and do what I need to do.
Unfortunately the changes are persistent so if I were to reboot and try Recovery Mode again, it won't load
What is so special about those four programs that prevent my recovery from loading?????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
e2fsck is a filesystem check utility for ext2
mke2fs is for ext2 filesystem creation
parted is a partitioning tool
tune2fs is for change some filesystem parameters (usually checking interval)
I've read that recovery from Amon-Ra creates automatically 3 partitions (ext2, swap and FAT32). So those commands whould probably mean ext2 filesystem creation. I'm sure Amon-Ra could give us more information on this subject because he added them to the image.
Have you checked your SD card?.
PD: I'm waiting for my N21 . So I can't test yet.
andferno said:
e2fsck is a filesystem check utility for ext2
mke2fs is for ext2 filesystem creation
parted is a partitioning tool
tune2fs is for change some filesystem parameters (usually checking interval)
I've read that recovery from Amon-Ra creates automatically 3 partitions (ext2, swap and FAT32). So those commands whould probably mean ext2 filesystem creation. I'm sure Amon-Ra could give us more information on this subject because he added them to the image.
Have you checked your SD card?.
PD: I'm waiting for my N21 . So I can't test yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for that insight.
I am not sure what RA's recovery would have done on its own...
but I have initiated and completed successfully a partition of my SDCard that includes FAT32, swap, and ext2.
Now that I have done this, for experimentation really, I don't know how to use it and what it gives me.
Obviously the swap is useless because I would need a cooked Android ROM that would actually utilize swap.
ext2 is probably for apps2sd... which I tried unsuccessfully - probably because of my own mistake.
I will continue trying and report again later.
As far as Amon_RA, he mentioned he was working on upgrading all the recovery images he has put out to the next version - thus we will be in queue until this comes to pass. Maybe we can just skip this version and go to the next
N21 vs DSTL1: stock comparisons
I have completed the comparison of recovery images of the DSTL1 and N21.
For this test I used an original mtd2.img from my DSTL1 and an original mtd2.img from Slemmen's N21.
The recovery images are identical:
Both mt2.img are 4,194,304 bytes
Both mtd2.img-kernel are 2,141,616 bytes
Both mtd2.img-ramdisk.gz are 386,645 bytes
What is also interesting to note is that the two boot images i inspected were also identical.
The DSTL1 boot image is one that came with the 1502 update from General Mobile (which may or may not be identical to the original).
The original N21 boot image, thanks to ikarishinjisan, is identical to the DSTL1 boot image:
Both mt1.img are 4,194,304 bytes
Both mtd1.img-kernel are 2,141,816 bytes
Both mtd1.img-ramdisk.gz are 148,671 bytes
*Notice how both recovery and boot are the same size... must be padded?
*Notice how boot kernel is 200 bytes more than recovery kernel.... interesting...
On a side note:
Bootloader is identical as expected: both ikarishinjisan's and my mtd0.img are 1,048,576 bytes.
If things are going to go custom, it might make some sense to put ext3 filesystems on these things.. ext3 is just ext2 with journalling, which could be helpful since phones can just die/get dropped/lose connection with battery/whatever.
Also, this can be done with the tools already there..
mkfs.ext2
tune2fs -j
dnfm said:
Also, this can be done with the tools already there..
mkfs.ext2
tune2fs -j
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you referring to the Amon_RA's custom recovery?
I can't get tune2fs onto the recovery without trickery, definitely not noob friendly... until we figure out why.
But great suggestion
I'm guessing the ROM must be coded to make use of ext3, otherwise its worthless?
The kernel would need to be configured to support ext3.
Hi all
can't post in the dev forum so i'm posting here instead. I have installed insanitycm009 and i love it so far, much faster than the previous insanity rom (none cm one) but i'm having some problems with random reboots.
I believe that it may have something to do with my filesystem as i was previously running ext4 on the last insanity rom. i loaded the ext4 manager app i have and it is unable to help me as i don't have a cf-root kernel installed. i am running glitch kernel v10.
ext4 manager shows my filesystems as follows:
/system = yaffs2
/dbdata = unknown
/data = unknown
/cache = yaffs2
as you can see the os is unable to identify the filesystems so i think this is the cause for the reboots. How can i fix this?
insanity cm is based on cyanogenmod 7
this is a custom built rom from the google sources that has nothing to do with other custom roms that are usually based on Samsung roms.
cm7 and miui and of course insanity cm need another type of kernel that is built to support a rom built in that fashion. the filesystem is also handled differently for example other partions are created and other filesystems used (yaffs for example) that means that probably the ext4 manager can't handle the environment. If you want to check what filesystems and partitions you have open the adb shell and type "mount" the same thing works in terminal emulator (an app from the market)
If there really was a problem with your filesystem that would cause you not to be able to read what it, the phone would probably not even boot.
read the insanity thread to see whether other people have the same problem or even a solution.
EDIT:
I know that's not really helpful, I'm sorry
thanks very much for your response.
I have had a quick look through the thread and have been unable to find anything remotely similar to what i am experiencing. (granted it was a quick look)
Don't suppose you have any thoughts do you as to what might be causing the reboots?
If i can't solve it i might just go back to a stock rom and see if i still get the reboots then.
(I wasn't really sure if this might fit into "Development", so I put it here, maybe a mod will move it, if it's a dev topic )
Anyways, here we go, I DUALBOOTED two different, independant ROMs on the S2
Video of dualboot in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9-V_6Ua_D0
** THIS IS NOT (YET) COMPATIBLE **
** WITH ICS (ANDROID 4.0.x) ROMS! **
-- this goes for custom ROMs as well as stock ROMs --
Icey Sammich compatibility will be added once Sammy released their ICS kernel sources.
!!! There now is an app for more convinient and easy setup of the dualboot !!!
(04.11.2011) DualBoot setup app v2.00: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=19049047&postcount=94
(12.12.2011) App has been updated to 2.51, lot's of good new stuff! >> Free Version -- Donate Version <<
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off:
This is only a little experiment I did like "c'mon, has to be possible" - this is NOT (at least yet) tweaked for usability and anything the like, just a humble experiment.
That said, don't flame me if things are rather complexicated to do this ATM.
Maybe I'll come up with a more userfriendly way of setting this up, maybe someone else does, maybe no one does.
Also now that I found a base on what to do, there might be different ways (more easy ones maybe) to set this up, I'll keep toying around with it.
But let's cut to the chase, shall we
So, how was this set up? I'll give a brief rundown of what I did:
I edited a few .rc files in the initramfs of the kernel to make it actually perform a full boot when recovery mode was triggered and to fire up recovery mode when in battery-charging mode.
I also edited a few mounts in the boot .rc for the 2nd OS (in "recovery" mode) to use different partitions for /system and /data, so that we'd end up with really independant installs.
What partitions did I missuse for that:
partition 12 (mostly unused, only when installing a stock ROM AFAIK) for /system - that's a neat choice IMO as p12 is 512MB in size, just as p9 where /system usually sits on
partition 7 (which is usually /cache) for /data
gives us only 100MB of user data space, but for now that's OK, as said, it's only an experiment on how such a thing could be done.
with the original partition for /cache "gone", I mounted a tmpfs for it.
So the OS still has a usable /cache
Then I set up the two OSes:
(dualboot kernel not yet flashed)
Launchprep part 1:
I made a CWM backup of my normal installation I was running (stock XXKG6 at the time).
I installed DevNull-Test AOSP as to it's instructions
Some su'ed voodoo via a terminal while having the 2nd OS (the DevNull AOSP one, in this case) installed - best done in recovery mode via ADB:
rm -Rf /cache/*
cp -Rp /data/* /cache/
dd if=/dev/block/mmcblk0p9 of=/dev/block/mmcblk0p12 bs=4096
That did "set up" the 2nd OS to where it's supposed to go.
Launchprep part 2:
Then, "advanced restore" of the backup made a few minutes earlier:
- boot
- system
- data
Reboot
At this point OS #1 is running again and OS #2 is sitting in hiding, prepared to roll - so, let's roll:
Flashed the modified "dualboot kernel" (via an App or Odin or magic, doesn't matter).
---> DONE <---
reached the point to where everything works as shown in the video.
As said above already, yes it needs some manual work to set it up, yes there's a lot of things that might not work, yes there are other/better ways to set it up.
It's only a humble experiment - lot's of space for improvement.
Maybe you like it - for those who do, I wanted to share this
Attached to this post you find the modified kernel I used, it's based on my v1.20 custom kernel (see sig) but with the above mentioned changes.
I've seen the video m8, this is totally different approach, ur giving this device a new dimension. love u "in a straight way" hahaa
there currently an app called Bootmanager which also handle up to quadruple booting. But sadly currently only support HTC phones.
http://www.appbrain.com/app/bootmanager/com.drx2.bootmanager
well, one can hope!
Thanks OP this is an awesome concept! Very happy to see you posted it with a video! and nice boot animation!
sunwee said:
there currently an app called Bootmanager which also handle up to quadruple booting. But sadly currently only support HTC phones.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, that's the thing.... that app is HTC only.... but we have Samsung S-II and want dualboot as well.
I'm already brainstorming on how to enhance the actual usability of this, i.e. flashing a 2nd OS directely to it's place instead of first installing it to the main system partition. But there is problems when /data is not mounted to the original partition, at least stock doesn't like it on initial boot.... well, well....
That is great. Going to use this for sure. This should be in development for sure.
Congratulations already.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
This is impressive bro sure will use it
but i want to ask one thing
SD card needed for this or not ?
That would be really cool (and definitely should goes to original development). Does it work with CM7/MIUI + custom rom?
vikas776 said:
SD card needed for this or not ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, so far this completely works with all internal storage.
But I have a few ideas I have yet to try to get mounted from other places - like images in /sdcard for example (I *so* hope that'll work.... )
Hi
Does this kernel include any of the Hellcat kernel tweaks or are they work in progress.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Tricky103 said:
Does this kernel include any of the Hellcat kernel tweaks or are they work in progress.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I made this build based on my v1.20 custom kernel, so it has everthing that one has - plus the touchfix already
exactly what i was hoping for.
great job - pls continue your work
Hi i tried this with instanity rom last night. When I use the three buttons to boot it just sits there not booting. My guess is the kernel is not compatible. Unless I made a mistake somewhere.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Hm, yah, might be that the kernel isn't fully compatible with that ROM, what kernel does the ROM usually use?
Did you boot it up fully at least once before copying /data to /cache ?
Yes I did fully boot up. But his kernel didn't have advanced activated in recovery so I flashed your kernel and moved the cache okay. But it said /data not found when I ran the 2nd command line.
I will flash aosp later. I like that rom.
I am not sure what kernel nitr8 uses. I think it is his own, Insane.tar would you like it to see if they can work together.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Tricky103 said:
But it said /data not found when I ran the 2nd command line.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hm, yeah, that sounds like something didn't work.... make sure you run those commands as root, i.e. "su" as very first command (I'll add that to the first post).
Give me a direct link to the ROM and I'll try it.
Make take a few days though as I'm away from my computer a lot because of work the next two days, but I'll try once time permits.
Well yeah, and this still is in highly experimental stage, if I (or someone else) should ever get this to more stable and reliable state, I'll make an easy to use installer/setup tool
But I got a few other ideas on setting it up I have to try first....
http://goo.gl/2uZCh
This is the complete rom. Only 47mb. I thought you would like the whole rom
Tricky103 said:
Hi
Does this kernel include any of the Hellcat kernel tweaks or are they work in progress.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be someday WINDOWS Mo 7 and Android on our sweet beast
Hi
I tried again with Aosp Dev-null. I still get this error "cp: can't stat '/data/*': No such file or directory "
after running this command line " cp -Rp /data/* /cache/ "
Any Ideas ?
It still doesn't boot if I press 3 button it brings up the boot logo and then black screens until it boots to the 1st partition.
Thanks for the link, will download and try as soon as time permits.
Also, try this command sequence, I got an idea what the issue maybe might be, give it a shot:
Code:
su
rm -Rf /cache/*
busybox cp -Rp /data/* /cache/
dd if=/dev/block/mmcblk0p9 of=/dev/block/mmcblk0p12 bs=4096
(use "busybox cp" instead of plain "cp", maybe it helps)
And some update on my ongoing thoughts for those interested:
- got an idea on how to make a more easy to use App for prepping and setting up the dualboot environment
- managed to do a neat thing I didn't really think it would work: issued a "mount" command and the OS thought it was mounting a partition of the internal flash (/dev/block/mmcblk0p12 in this test, but was testing for later on actually doing it with p9 - you might see where I'm headed here ) but instead of the partition it actually mounted from an .img file! (loopback)
i.e. "mount /dev/block/mmcblk0p12 /somedir" actually mounted "/somepath/someimage.img" to "/somedir" instead of the partition from /dev/block/... (you just gotta love Linux and it's flexible way of handling things....)
NOW, imagine /dev/block/mmcblk0p9 (the partition carrying the system) and p10 (data) being (kinda) transparently mounted from an IMAGE FILE
I "only" have to find a way to sneak this in before init starts mounting stuff.
If there's a way to do THAT.... unlimited multiboot from OS images, anyone?
(so far this is kinda dreaming, but would be cool to get it working )
So I've spent the better part of a week attempting to upgrade my tablet to KK and F2FS-ALL. (I was on 4.3.1, didn't want to touch KK, but Lollipop is a non-starter because I use Xposed, and I need the security updates in KK.)
I originally tried USBhost's build of Carbon, and that seemed OK, except for mysterious lags waking up ... and the fact that it can't run one of my favorite games, which makes me wonder what else it breaks. I also tried SlimKat, Dirty Unicorns, and Liquid Smooth, which I sort of liked, disliked, and couldn't boot (plus LS formats /system as EXT4, despite claiming F2FS support).
I'm totally sold on the performance gains in F2FS. The lags I saw on EXT4 are gone, even with F2FS being mounted as discard by default in M-Kernel. (I need to find more documentation as to whether this is necessary or not for F2FS, because it doesn't seem like it should be.) I wonder if there's enough of a gain with F2FS that it would make device encryption actually tolerable, but I don't have time to play with that right now.
I settled on flashing CM 11 M12 using poo706's script hack and MultiRom's hacked TWRP, with M-Kernel a69, current Busybox and SuperSU. I'm not a fan of CM, but I can't be screwing around with ROMs that aren't stable right now as I'm about to travel.
More importantly: CM 11 was one of the only ROMs that had f2fs-tools 1.40 binaries in /system/bin. (The others were Carbon and Liquid Smooth. This is simple enough to check; just look at the binaries in the ZIP file before flashing.) All the others either had no fsck at all, or had old versions of fsck.f2fs.
That completely mystifies me, because F2FS is a bleeding edge filesystem, which didn't even have the *possibility* of repairing corruption until f2fs-tools 1.40 released in September. (Does it work? Who knows; AFAIK the filesystem is still in active development.) Why would you claim support for F2FS, and not include any utilities to check and fix it? Have ROM builders just not gotten the memo that fsck.f2fs got that update in September?
There's almost no information out there about F2FS on Android in general, so I'm going to throw this out there: can anyone build f2fs-tools 1.40 as universal, statically-linked binaries which can be dropped into any KK ROM via flash scripting or an installer app? Y'know, something like Stericson's Busybox installer, but just for f2fs-tools? Is that even possible? (Would it be better to use the fork in the current Lollipop master? I have no idea; all I know is that said fork is in active development. I don't know if CM is doing their own work on this, or just pulling from master.) It just seems like the sort of thing that should be part and parcel of an F2FS implementation, as opposed to the bare minimum hacks which are still being used.
If I already knew how to build a ROM, I would've already done this. I don't, and I'm about to travel, so I don't have time to attempt it right now. (Also: do you really want someone who hasn't done this before throwing out builds?)
-XCN-
You might have seen this guide on XDA, but is out-dated and only seems to work on stock firmware. What about people people running CM13, will it work, or will it brick your device?
This guide is updated and works with CM13 tested by me, it was also written with the i9300 16GB model in mind.
FAQ: next post
I take NO responcebility for any bricks, that's on you. Exactly like rooting, or installing anything 3:rd party (right?). Either is is my responsibility if any data is lost.
If you don't follow the guide, and adventure on your own, there's no one to blame but yourself when **** hits the fan.
Now, let's have a look at my partitions before modifying them (kB):
Code:
Filesystem Total Used Available Use% Mounted on
mmcblk0p8 1032088 17732 1014356 2% /cache
mmcblk0p12 11901576 6355436 5546140 53% /data
mmcblk0p12 11901576 6355436 5546140 53% /sdcard
mmcblk0p10 564416 8964 555452 2% /preload
mmcblk0p9 1548144 632704 915440 41% /system
mmcblk0p3 20144 9568 10576 47% /efs
As you can see, stock paritioning is bad. /preload and /cache has a lot of available space which takes up a lot of unnecessary space.
We can minimize all the partitions and use the space to increase your internal storage, neat; let's do it!
1. Check for buggy eMMC chip
First of all we'll be checking if your chip is possible to SDS (sudden death syndrome) which basicly corrupts your eMMC (internal storage) chip.
This only effects the 16GB model, if you're on another model just skip to the flashing part.
A. Download the app eMMC Brickbug Check app from the Play Store.
B. Check eMMC
Check if your device has the following under eMMC chip:
Type: VTU00M
FwRev: 0xF1
If the values match, you should update to the latest ROM + kernel available ASAP, which should fix SDS, if you don't; your eMMC chip might corrupt under the process of flashing REPIT.
2. Flashing guide
A. Before we begin
- Make sure that you're running the latest version of TWRP (i9300, i9305). Any other recovery and the script will NOT work.
- Do NOT continue if you're running stock, or planning to do so. This script is only tested on official CM13.
- Make sure you're plugged into a power source, and not a computer; or else partitions may fail to un-mount.
- Do a backup of your rare cat images so they don't get lost in the worst scenario.
- (optional) If you want to configure the script, see this.
B. Download required tool
We'll be using ourselves with the tool REPIT made by @Lanchon.
Without it I wouldn't make this guide as it is the only(CN) flexible tool for modifying partitions in Android.
Download the required flashable zip file: [updated 2017-01-22]
- i9300 - here
- i9305 - here
Make sure you DON'T rename it; copy it to your device.
C. Boot into recovery - volume up + home button + power button when powered off
D. Flash the zip file
- This process is a really long one, do NOT interrupt the process.
- If the flashing fails, it may tell you that it copied itself to /tmp, navigate to /tmp and flash the script again.
- If x partition fails to un-mount, try un-mounting it via TWRP > Mount.
Inside TWRP navigate to Install > Navigate to saved REPIT and select > Swipe to confirm flash.
3. Done!
You may now restart your device and verify the extra utilized internal storage.
It's not that hard eh? That's because @Lanchon did a great job on his project available on GitHub. Him and I worked closely on #22 to add support for the i9300.
After re-partitioning (still kB):
Code:
Filesystem Total Used Available Use% Mounted on
mmcblk0p8 32240 4200 26404 14% /cache
mmcblk0p12 13457732 574316 12199796 4% /data
mmcblk0p12 13457732 574316 12199796 4% /sdcard
mmcblk0p10 8048 4120 3520 54% /preload
mmcblk0p9 1548144 638168 909976 41% /system
mmcblk0p3 20144 9568 10576 47% /efs
It seems like we've gained 1.5GB in local storage, hoorah! Totally didn't steal from other partitions
Worth it? (my opinion)
Unless you REALLY need that 1.5GB of extra storage; NO, not at all.
On Android 6+ (CM13) sd-cards are now implemented like normal internal storage. Just buy a 8GB micro sd-card which costs a couple of bucks these days and save yourself some trouble.
Not only that, recently a user possibly got SDS (sudden death syndrome, do your own research) after flashing REPIT. Did my own research and I updated the guide with a step to check for this buggy eMMC chip.
Credit:
- @Lanchon for REPIT.
- @forumber2 for original guide.
QnA:
The questions are kinda copied from the old guide.
Q: Why is /cache a large partition?
A: It's because stock software updates saves in the partition. The partition was extended(CN) when upgrading to Android 4.3, as the update was so large, the cache partition had to be as well. AOSP does NOT use the partition when updating.
Q: What is the /preload partition for?
A: It's only really used if you bought the phone locked. Many mobile operators put in extra apps, and bloatware too in the partition only utilized in stock firmware; and even then... There's some random Samsung crap too. REPIT minimizes the partition.
Q: Any consequences of flashing?
A: Yes, you will NOT be able to install stock firmwares (assuming that you're not running stock). A undo is easy as the script is so flexible.
You will also burn a lot of eMMC life cycles using REPIT so don't do it often, and I hope you've read 1. where I covered the buggy eMMC chip thingy.
Q: Something went wrong with flashing the zip file!
A: Please upload the REPIT log usally found in the folder where you placed the flashable zip file to dropbox, or https://paste.tinyw.in; apparently pastebin doesn't like long logs. Can also be in /tmp. Otherwise you can copy the whole TWRP log found in /tmp/recovery.log, /cache/recovery/log or /cache/recovery/last_log. NEVER copy the whole log and make a post out of it, you're spamming the thread by doing so. Issues with REPIT should NOT be reported here, instead go to the REPIT GitHub page here.
Q: I want to undo these changes!
A: Since @Lanchon is taking over this thread :laugh:, ask him. Sorry for me not doing my homework.
Q: How about the x GB model?
A: They all work, REPIT is designed to assign any leftovers to the partition we use.
More questions? Bring them on.
Reserved #2
May be it's better to give proper credits too considering it was a big mess up in past.
Sent from my "i9300/1+2" powered by Carbon/Temasek
Fueled by 7000mAh ZeroLemon Battery
nicesoni_ash said:
May be it's better to give proper credits too considering it was a big mess up in past.
Sent from my "i9300/1+2" powered by Carbon/Temasek
Fueled by 7000mAh ZeroLemon Battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Woops, I made the guide in notepad++, and accedently removed some lines when editing it; including a better credit to @Lanchon; adding in a new one now.
Hawaii_Beach said:
Woops, I made the guide in notepad++, and accedently removed some lines when editing it; including a better credit to @Lanchon; adding in a new one now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant in your op too.
Sent from my "i9300/1+2" powered by Carbon/Temasek
Fueled by 7000mAh ZeroLemon Battery
Btw, is it possible to modify this script somehow so that you can reformat the /cache partition to f2fs? Afaik the minimum size is 100mb.
Sincci said:
Btw, is it possible to modify this script somehow so that you can reformat the /cache partition to f2fs? Afaik the minimum size is 100mb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I'm sorry. It is already known, on GitHub: #8.
The minimum size of /cache? The script sets /cache to 32240kB which is 32MB..
nicesoni_ash said:
I meant in your op too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OP?
Hawaii_Beach said:
No, I'm sorry. It is already known, on GitHub: #8.
The minimum size of /cache? The script sets /cache to 32240kB which is 32MB..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After I read your conversation with @Lanchon on git, it seems to me that there is no need to wipe data and it will still work, it's that right?
OP - Original Post basically referred to first post.
Sent from my "i9300/1+2" powered by Carbon/Temasek
Fueled by 7000mAh ZeroLemon Battery
nicesoni_ash said:
After I read your conversation with @Lanchon on git, it seems to me that there is no need to wipe data and it will still work, it's that right?
OP - Original Post basically referred to first post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you don't need to wipe /data. It just makes things faster; as you wont have to move the content around. Without wiping, it will take a longer time to re-partition.
The script will NOT wipe /data except you add +wipe to -data=max (-data=max+wipe-i9300)
OP has so many meanings, it's f***ed.
Hawaii_Beach said:
On Android 6+ (CM13) sd-cards are now implemented like normal internal storage. Just buy a 8GB micro sd-card which basicly costs a couple of bucks and save yourself some trouble.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi, thanks for the guide!
actually, the external sdcard will always be slower than the internal eMMC. also, the extra free space gets auto-TRIMmed in /data, making the whole eMMC (and thus your phone) faster. also, adopted storage diminishes the total reliability of your phone and data (more devices can fail).
in all, i'd recommend anybody with less than 2 or 3GB free space in /data to REPIT; it's safe and easy.
---------- Post added at 05:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:22 PM ----------
Sincci said:
Btw, is it possible to modify this script somehow so that you can reformat the /cache partition to f2fs? Afaik the minimum size is 100mb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
REPIT does not support f2fs for now.
(future support will not include wipe without resizing, as f2fs does not support that yet.)
but you can get what you want anyway:
"-cache=0.03125+wipe"
actually means
"-cache=0.03125+wipe+ext4"
given that ext4 is the default FS for "cache".
"wipe" means format, and never mind what was there before. even if it was something that wasn't ext4 at all, it will succeed.
so you can use:
"-cache=0.0976+wipe"
to get exactly 100MiB-sized cache (in ext4)
then, afterwards, use TWRP to format cache in F2FS
and you'd get what you want.
but...
DON'T!!!
dont use F2FS in ANY partition besides /data! it makes NO sense!
F2FS has an overhead of about 100MB, so basically you would be creating a /cache that is unable to hold any files at all. (ext4 has 5MB overhead.)
and why have a dysfunctional /cache? what for? to have problems? incompatibilities?
certainly not performance, because cache is NEVER used in android. so why do it?
it's soft of a crazy fad, like /system in f2fs.
/system, the one partition we never write to, lol
---------- Post added at 05:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:35 PM ----------
nicesoni_ash said:
May be it's better to give proper credits too considering it was a big mess up in past.
Sent from my "i9300/1+2" powered by Carbon/Temasek
Fueled by 7000mAh ZeroLemon Battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks!
no credit required!!! the GPL allows him to do as he pleases, as long as he doesn't remove the license or claims copyright.
but anyway, thanks for the credit appreciated!
and thanks for invaluable help to port to i9300!!
---------- Post added at 05:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:39 PM ----------
btw, i should start thanking the people who helped with the ports in the comments of the device port file. so far 2. i will back-credit when i get the time.
and i9305 and others are probably trivially supported, i just need the dumps done.
Lanchon said:
really long stuff going on
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is that not only could REPIT be ported to i9300, but any other Samsung device, right? They all run TouchWiz; for example s4, s5, s6? Have anyone even checked partitions on those devices?
The thing with partitions and the Android community is that almost no one discusses it. If you do a google on partitions on Android; very Little information / threads exist.
Lanchon said:
hi, thanks for the guide!
actually, the external sdcard will always be slower than the internal eMMC. also, the extra free space gets auto-TRIMmed in /data, making the whole eMMC (and thus your phone) faster. also, adopted storage diminishes the total reliability of your phone and data (more devices can fail).
in all, i'd recommend anybody with less than 2 or 3GB free space in /data to REPIT; it's safe and easy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be honest, I never cared about storage speed (same goes for trim), not a heavy user on my phone, and have never been, just doesn't go well when I'm the operator. As long as it doesn't take 1 year to copy my secret .mp4's (ransom.mp4 and many more), there's no worries.
About failure, it's like running a computer. If you shut down a computer without sending signals (unplug from wall etc), it may damage the harddrive; right? Same here. Right?
Any how, If I ever run out of space on my i9300, I'd just add a sd-card. I don't save anything important on my device that doesn't get backed up via TWRP. But..
that's never going to happen! Because my OnePlus One is coming back from RMA service! (finally after 4 months (not kidding)). kinda off topic, but hey; it's my thread right :good:
Hawaii_Beach said:
The thing is that not only could REPIT be ported to i9300, but any other Samsung device, right? They all run TouchWiz; for example s4, s5, s6? Have anyone even checked partitions on those devices?
The thing with partitions and the Android community is that almost no one discusses it. If you do a google on partitions on Android; very Little information / threads exist.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol about the quote
besides the name playing on samsung's PIT files, REPIT can actually work on any device with TWRP support. but the partition layout in most newer devices is friendly enough not to bother. even the stock i9300 layout is sort of friendly. highly problematic are only the devices that shipped before ICS with android 2.x (galaxy S2) or devices that shipped with non-emulated internal sdcard.
discussion is low volume because partitioning is considered 'dangerous'. and it can be, you can brick if you mess up. the idea of REPIT was to make it safe by encapsulating a bit of knowledge of each device in the device port file. motivation was that S2 users suddenly all needed to repit: their devices stopped working after a nightly flash because of /system being too small, it was a mess, lol.
btw, since you asked before, that's the reason why porting is needed: because you can't trust users not to make mistakes with full freedom. users that want full freedom have other tools: gdisk, parted, mkfs.xxx, resize2fs, etc.
Lanchon said:
lol ab...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I know that other devices doesn't even need to touch the partitions, as it is a waste of time. (so is this??)
edit: still, maybe I want a extra 1.5gb on my s6 Active or whatever.
edit: by for today, it's 00:00 here..
discussion is low volume because partitioning is considered 'dangerous'. and it can be, you can brick if you mess up. the idea of REPIT was to make it safe by encapsulating a bit of knowledge of each device in the device port file. motivation was that S2 users suddenly all needed to repit: their devices stopped working after a nightly flash because of /system being too small, it was a mess, lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dangerous!? I've seen way more people fu** their IMEI number (including ME on MINE i9300) by doing something dumb to the /efs content (totally didn't try to unlock the phone), that's dangerous. (got 0049)
The phone was just lying round until I got around to fix it, not going to get into details as XDA doesn't allow this stuff. It was really fustrating as people said that reflashing stock would get back the IMEI (should apparantly work, etc etc).
yet again side tracked, but i'm the operator right? :good: :highfive:
@Lanchon
Since we are talking abt partitions, I would like to ask a question that's not related to this tool but the other way mentioned in first post by flashing a zip file with manually entering the size in script file.
I tried that a while back on my s3 and it worked great. I was on kitkat that time and it was fine till lollipop came. So I flashed lollipop but since the system size was only about 500mb, it failed to flash so I made another zip with system size to 800mb and flashed it again. Although everything went fine but after flashing a new rom or restoring my old backup phone always showed some encryption error and asked to factory reset and even after doing that, still showed the same error even though I never encrypted anything. So the only option was to flash stock with pit file and change the partitions to stock size and then restore or flash a new rom.
I was never able to partition my phone after that coz that error always came back. I have op2 now so all molding goes on it and s3 is like a backup phone but I am still interested to know what was that all about and what could I do to fix that or whether my emmc worn out?
Sent from my "i9300/1+2" powered by Carbon/Temasek
Fueled by 7000mAh ZeroLemon Battery
Hawaii_Beach said:
Dangerous!? I've seen way more people fu** their IMEI number (including ME on MINE i9300) by doing something dumb to the /efs content (totally didn't try to unlock the phone), that's dangerous. (got 0049)
The phone was just lying round until I got around to fix it, not going to get into details as XDA doesn't allow this stuff. It was really fustrating as people said that reflashing stock would get back the IMEI (should apparantly work, etc etc).
yet again side tracked, but i'm the operator right? :good: :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well... effing the bootloader i way worse than borking /efs, believe me.
now, trying to hack /efs WITHOUT A BACKUP (!!) is big jesus f*cking christ sh*t u talking lol!!!
Lanchon said:
well... effing the bootloader i way worse than borking /efs, believe me.
now, trying to hack /efs WITHOUT A BACKUP (!!) is big jesus f*cking christ sh*t u talking lol!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahahaha yep. Didn't know the risk dude.
nicesoni_ash said:
@Lanchon
Since we are talking abt partitions, I would like to ask a question that's not related to this tool but the other way mentioned in first post by flashing a zip file with manually entering the size in script file.
I tried that a while back on my s3 and it worked great. I was on kitkat that time and it was fine till lollipop came. So I flashed lollipop but since the system size was only about 500mb, it failed to flash so I made another zip with system size to 800mb and flashed it again. Although everything went fine but after flashing a new rom or restoring my old backup phone always showed some encryption error and asked to factory reset and even after doing that, still showed the same error even though I never encrypted anything. So the only option was to flash stock with pit file and change the partitions to stock size and then restore or flash a new rom.
I was never able to partition my phone after that coz that error always came back. I have op2 now so all molding goes on it and s3 is like a backup phone but I am still interested to know what was that all about and what could I do to fix that or whether my emmc worn out?
Sent from my "i9300/1+2" powered by Carbon/Temasek
Fueled by 7000mAh ZeroLemon Battery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well i cannot answer about scripts and procedures unknown to me but...
an encrypted disk typically is made of 2 things:
-the encrypted disk 'surface' or area (ie: the data)
-and metadata (data describing the data, ie: data describing the encrypted disk)
metadata typically contains:
-cipher info
-and the disk surface encryption key (generated at random), itself encrypted with the access key (such as a passphrase).
why the indirect key? without it:
-changing the passphrase (say, your phone lock pattern) would be a very dangerous operation that would require reading, reencrypting and writing the complete disk, would take a huge amount of time and would drain your battery completely
-erasing the disk would similarly take a long time.
with it:
-when changing the passphrase you just need to reencrypt the surface key with the new passphrase and rewrite the metadata.
-when erasing, just wipe the metadata.
for example the metadata in recent android phones with hardware backing store for keys probably contains:
-cipher info
-and the disk surface encryption key (generated at random), itself encrypted with a secondary key (also random).
the secondary key lives in the hardware keystore. it's generated there and can never leave that processor. the keystore will decrypt the surface key during boot, only if the main processor informs the right passphrase (say, the PIN or pattern). a 4-digit PIN would be very easy to bruteforce, except that the keystore throttles down guesses, and can even wipe the key (rendering the disk forever unreadable) after so many bad guesses.
the keystore should be tamper-proof: a silly small processor, but resistant to voltage spike attacks, rays, etc and decapping to read the storage, to pick up signals in traces, to inject signals in traces, to chip modifications, etc. think of it as the chip in any recent credit card or even some sim cards, but on the main circuit board.
anyway back to metadata in android: it needs to be stored somewhere. the obvious place is an ultra small metadata partition containing just the raw metadata, no file system or anything of the like. this is simple and works great, except for one detail: older phones don't have this partition. basically this means that an android upgrade couldn't give you encryption.
so android can use a "crypto footer": with this scheme the encryptable partition (say /data) has a file system that is 16KiByte short of filling the actual partition, and the 16KiB footer follows. the footer is the metadata.
when you repartitioned before, you probably created a file system that used the complete partition area. there was no space left for the footer, so encryption couldn't be enabled.
you could have solved your issue today by flashing repit with all-default parameters: repit always resizes the encryptable partition's file system to make room for the footer, if not already there.
in REPIT, these commits add general and ext4-particular support for crypto footers:
https://github.com/Lanchon/REPIT/commit/591961adb180a6a03594053a846b698240b4d507
https://github.com/Lanchon/REPIT/commit/de3d3af9813afef7de3a798ce5314c0fb210e30f
https://github.com/Lanchon/REPIT/commit/5c3360b572ff25c7c01d796cabb9400066451ec3
this configures the footer on the i9300:
https://github.com/Lanchon/REPIT/blob/f46b0aafdfeb7860be17a315b4aceb43966325f9/device/i9300.sh#L85