Database Users

Pocket Hack Master XDA II mini Result

the following result are done with
Pocket Hack master 2004 3.05.001
Spb Benchmark 1.1.0 B40
Torrance (%) 0.55 1.02 0.13 0
SPB B SPB % CPU Index CPU %
Default 1210.33 100 1597.07 100
Dynamic (max 416) 1226.75 102 1573.02 99
208 870.17 72 1095.37 69
416 1201.09 100 1601.87 101
468 1356.75 113 1813.79 114
520 1515.54 126 2016.91 127
for OC to 520 Mhz approx. 26% imporve on system performance and 27% CPU Index
Hope useful.

How about underclock the procesor for decrese battery consumption? ...is it stable at 520mhz?
Regards,
P.C.
p.s. Great job!

Very stable so far.. will do battery test soon. but it take a long time to do so.

i wrote it on another post a few days ago.. but u can go higher than 530Mhz if u add new speeds in the manual settings - my jam reported it was stable at 600 and something... even 845Mhz worked!

The speed of CPU can show upto 1040 at 130 Mhz Bus speed.
but the MIPS rate won't change above 520 this means above 520
the CPU will ignore the freq multi and lock to 4x which is 520Mhz

What probability I have to "burn" my JAM procesor? :?: ...I don`t know a lot of PDA-s...but I do know about computers...is there the same thing?...the battery consumptions should increase...what about the heat?.... :roll:
Regards,
Primoz

PCAIOO said:
The speed of CPU can show upto 1040 at 130 Mhz Bus speed.
but the MIPS rate won't change above 520 this means above 520
the CPU will ignore the freq multi and lock to 4x which is 520Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh ok.. thanks for the info

Undervolting Thread

This thread has been created to share Undervolting Settings (UV).
Undervolting makes CPU/GPU/Modem to consume less power, thus extend battery life. This is allowed by flashing modified kernels that allow UV (Thanks to raspdeep's work). One can use Voltage Control to change settings (Thanks to xan).
Setting format is -x mV for a given CPU clock as used in xan's app: [1200Mhz] [1000Mhz] [800Mhz] [400Mhz] [200Mhz] [100Mhz]
What are your settings?
PS: Please edit your very first post with settings instead of reposting. Thank you!

Stable: 50 50 75 100 100 100
1200 max: 50
1000 max: 50
800 max: 75

I am currently running 50 50 50 75 100 100 with no stability problems. It has made 4 back-to-back quadrant runs and a couple days of general usage without any crashes so far.

Undervolting doesn't work well with my phone the same with overclocking. I can't undervolt 1000Mhz and above because it causes much stability issues here. I can only undervolt 100-800Mhz with settings < 100mV.

TheVisitorX said:
Undervolting doesn't work well with my phone the same with overclocking. I can't undervolt 1000Mhz and above because it causes much stability issues here. I can only undervolt 100-800Mhz with settings < 100mV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My system hangs in sleep mode when I have setCPU or Superpower with sidekick on.

I have the max cpu capped at 800mhz using SetCpu.
Undervolted -50 for 800mhz 600 400 200 and 100 each.Phone was at 50% last night and 6 hours later it's dead.Battery was completely discharged.All i did was set everything at 50Mvs less.Correct ? i think i'm missing something.Do help.thanks.

hey guys
im new to oc and uv
im currenlty using ramads gb jvh with hardcores speedmod kernel
ive got tegraks ultimate app and have oc'd it to 1100 as anything above reboots my phone
everything else is the same as standard
i was wondering if anyone else can help me with what i should change
i have no clue,
so far
frequency 1100
core 1275mv
internel 1100
cpu level 1
frequency 800
core 1200
internel 1100
cpu level 2
frequency 400
core 1050
internal 1100
cpu level 3
frequency 200
core 950
internal 1100
cpu level 4
frequency 100
core 950
internal 1000
these values are all stock, i havent touched them
im wanting to know what i should change them to
thanks
forgot to add, my battery life is really bad, i use hsdpa and wifi frequently

i have cm7 #19 with the (latest) glitch v10b-VC kernel..no oc, bu uv
100mhz -50,200mhz -50,400mhz -50, 800mhz -25 and 1000mhz @stock

What is the negative effects of UV?
My current values starting at 1000mhz is:
-75
-100
-100
-125
-175

hackeron said:
What is the negative effects of UV?
My current values starting at 1000mhz is:
-75
-100
-100
-125
-175
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Negative effects come in the form of stability issues and random reboots. Is doesn't physically damage the processor. By lowering the core voltage supplied to the CPU, you also decrease the noise margin for the CPU to properly differentiate between logic 1 and logic 0. This is why -75, for example, works for some and not for others because processors are not 100% identical. The obvious benefit UV is lower power consumption.

gtda said:
hey guys
im new to oc and uv
im currenlty using ramads gb jvh with hardcores speedmod kernel
ive got tegraks ultimate app and have oc'd it to 1100 as anything above reboots my phone
everything else is the same as standard
i was wondering if anyone else can help me with what i should change
i have no clue,
so far
frequency 1100
core 1275mv
internel 1100
cpu level 1
frequency 800
core 1200
internel 1100
cpu level 2
frequency 400
core 1050
internal 1100
cpu level 3
frequency 200
core 950
internal 1100
cpu level 4
frequency 100
core 950
internal 1000
these values are all stock, i havent touched them
im wanting to know what i should change them to
thanks
forgot to add, my battery life is really bad, i use hsdpa and wifi frequently
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm also using Tegrak's overclock apk for some time now (from beginning) and it's really good!
Just lower the core voltage (start with cpu level 0) until it's unstable (random reboots), then add a few mv (+5) to make it stable again (no reboots). do this for every core frequency (only one at the time, so you know witch one is making the system unstable). I never touch the internal frequency... Undervolting will NOT damage your CPU (overclocking can if you're not carefull)
Don't be stupid testing just a few hours, test (stress test) for days. Only then you are sure it's stable
These are my settings:
(rock stable after a few weeks => playing asphalt6, running quadrant and smartbench hours a day for a few weeks,...)
cpu level 0
frequency 1000
core 1205mv (-70) => could get it stable at 1200 but had one reboot after one week, so I added +5
internel 1100
cpu level 1
frequency 800
core 1105 (-95) => could get it stable at 1100 but had one reboot after one week, so I added +5
internel 1100
cpu level 2
frequency 400
core 950 (-100)
internal 1100
cpu level 3
frequency 200
core 825 (-125)
internal 1100
cpu level 4
frequency 100
core 825 (-125)
internal 1100
Now I know what my lowest core voltage is, I can start overclocking (not for now).
I'm on stock deodexed JVP 2.3.4 with Hardcore (latest) Speedmod (partition EXT4), Tegrack Overclock Ultimate and Voodoo Control Plus (holy combo => Quadrant 2400+ (no OC, just UV) and wow, what a great battery life!
edit: yes, I need to update my signature

SamHaLeKe said:
cpu level 4
frequency 100
core 825 (-125)
internal 1100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^ Typo??????????
internal voltage @ 100Mhz is 1000mV by default, so you are overvolting.

kiwijunglist said:
^ Typo??????????
internal voltage @ 100Mhz is 1000mV by default, so you are overvolting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Default value is 950mV on my phone according to pimpmycpu. According to SamHaLeKe's post, he's reducing his by -125 so 825mV is correct
I'm new to UV, and just experimenting. My current values are
1200 = -50mV
800 = -50mV
400 = -100mV
200 = -100mV
100 = -150mV
Seems ok so far, more aggressive cutting gave me reboots

$$$

The most i could get from my phone w/o stability issues
1500 - 50
1400 - 50
1300 - 50
1200 - 50
1000 - 50
800 - 75
400 - 100
200 - 125
100 - 150

Starting from 1000MHz, I'm using these values :
-50 [1000]
-75 [800]
-100 [400]
-125 [200]
-150 [100]
No stability issues since then !

Mine are;
1000 : 50
800 : 50
400 : 75
200 : 75
100 : 100
Works great for me
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk

swaakx said:
Starting from 1000MHz, I'm using these values :
-50 [1000]
-75 [800]
-100 [400]
-125 [200]
-150 [100]
No stability issues since then !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have the same!
my phone now cold as ice. and greatly stable

I'm a noob at this UV stuff but I'm quite interesting about that.
I tried with Control Freak, should I set first a low voltage on 100Mhz and try to stress the cpu only with this change on 100MHZ? or should I set all voltages and test?
thx for help

i'm on jvq darkyrom
using tegrak overclock ultimate
1200mhz 1255 (-20)
800mhz 1105 (-95)
400mhz 950 (-100)
200mhz 850 (-100)
100mhz 810 (-140)

[REF] OC/UV Settings ***Settings Only, No Questions Please***

I know many of us have been trying to put together a working set of voltage settings for OC'ed kernels that works.
I also know that all hardware is not created equally, so this thread is meant to help with those users trying this for the first time as well as give people playing around with the settings a place to keep their data.
Please post a response in this format:
Kernel:
Scheduler: (scheduler is the top left option in Voltage Control)
Batch: (the batch number is listed behind the battery)
OC/UV Settings:
1600 - 175
1500 - 175
etc
Please post any commentary on your settings in the bottom of your post.
If you get a shutdown or freeze because of your settings, please edit your post to put the new settings.
***Also, please do not fill up this thread with questions. I would like this to be a repository of OC/UV settings only.***
Mods, if this is not the appropriate forum for this information, I apologize.

Kernel: CogKernel 4
Scheduler: CFQ
Batch:1007
1200 - 50*
1120 - 50*
1000 - 0
900 - 100
800 - 100
600 - 100
400 - 100
200 - 100
100 - 100
*- previous setting of 175 crashed after several hours. now trying 50

You may also want to know what kernel and scheduler are being used. I've had issues (sleep of death) with bfq, but noop seems to be great.
kernel - SetiroN 1.4.7 1200
scheduler - noop
batch - 1007
1200 - 125
1000 - 125
800 - 125
400 - 125
200 - 125
100 - 125

ooh great idea, maybe also include the kernel you are using atm, and if possible the phone batch number?
SetiroN's 1.4.6
batch 10.11
Scheduler: noop
OC/UV settings
1200 - 125
1000 - 100
800 - 125
400 - 150
200 - 150
100 - 200
there is rare freezes on android.core with this setup, but its not a big problem, and battery life is really good so this is my usual setup

Kernel: CogKernel 4
Scheduler: CFQ
Batch: 1007
Voltage Settings:
1600
1500
1400 (-175)*
1300 (-175)
1200 (-150)
1120 (-150)
1000 (0)
900 (0)
800 (0)
600 (0)
400 (0)
200 (0)
100 (0)
* - current running and stable

SetiroN kernel 1.4.3
Scheduler: noop
Batch: 1007
OC/UV settings
1280 - 50
1000 - 50
800 - 75
400 - 100
200 - 100
100 - 125
Stable, no freezes, no charger death. Afraid to mess with it. I lose about 2% (total, not per hour) battery overnight (6-7 hours).

Kernel: CogKernel 4
Scheduler: CFQ
Batch: 1006 (is it old enough to be a classic?)
Voltage Settings:
*edit set 1300 to 150 (175 freezes, 125 freezes) and it seems to be working
1200 -100
1120 -100
1000 -100
900 -100
800 -100
600 -100
400 -100
200 -100
100 -100
1300 is running stable with above settings
1200 works with settings in black very stable

designgears said:
Kernel: CogKernel 4
Scheduler: CFQ
Batch: 1007
Voltage Settings:
1600
1500
1400 (-175)*
1300 (-175)
1200 (-150)
1120 (-150)
1000 (0)
900 (0)
800 (0)
600 (0)
400 (0)
200 (0)
100 (0)
* - current running and stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what cpu??

Kernel: SetiroN 1.5.4 XT 1600MHz
Scheduler: BFQ
Batch: 1007
OC/UV Settings:
1600 - 75*
1552 - 75*
1504 - 0
1464 - 75*
1456 - 0
1400 - 0
1344 - 0
1288 - 50*
1200 - 50*
1000 - 0
800 - 0
400 - 0
200 - 0
100 - 0
*STABLE

godzulu said:
what cpu??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
set at 1300 cpu
settings in signature. So far, so good

Hey great thread...one Q where to look for batch number??

Underneath your battery is the batch number.
Kernel: Setiron 1.4.3
Scheduler: NOOP
Batch: 1008
OC/UV Settings: 1280 - 25
1000 - 25
800 - 50
400 - 75
200 - 75
100 - 75
Updated voltage control app to get settings to stick on boot. Other than that no problems whatsoever and running stable and flawlessly.

What does the scheduler and batch number signify?
Edit: only asking because I know others will be asking the same thing
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

Kernel: Setiron 1.4.4
Scheduler: BFQ
OC/UV Settings:
1300 - 25
1000 - 50
800 - 75
400 - 100
200 - 100
100 - 100
Voltages stick on boot. Didn't have to make any changes to the generated script. All I did was mount system as R/w first and then save the voltages settings from the voltage app.
Very stable, no FCs since I flashed...about 4 days ago.

ninjuh said:
What does the scheduler and batch number signify?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Batch number signifies what batch your phone was created in. Much like Sony and Microsoft use numbers with their consoles to indicate what hardware may reside in the chassis or what time period they were manufactured under, mobile phones, or much any electronic device that is released in cycles, follows the same principle.
As for the scheduler, a scheduler in terms of processing is in lamens terms...Processes waiting to be executed in your memory are allocated to the CPU by the scheduler. It selects the next operation to get executed from the RAM, basically. Operating Systems are processes in themselves, so there has to be a medium to make sure the operating system and application processes play nicely together. That's not all there is to it, the scheduler means a lot for I/O[input/output] operations as well, but we're keeping it lamen.
In a nutshell, it's the middle aged Nanny that lives inside your processor. It makes sure everything is clean, runs time efficiently [nannies are usually paid by the hour], and it makes sure none of the kids rough-house or make a mess. Done.
By the way, OP says no questions. I answered it because I'm obviously one of the coolest, nicest guys around, but let's keep it to a minimum and stay on track!

Kernel: CogKernel4
Scheduler: CFQ
Batch: 1006
I set max at 1300 now, since 1400 froze, but ONLY on 3d intensive stuff.
1600, -0
1500, -0
1400, -175 when in use
1300, -150
1200, -100
1120, -75
1000, -50

joeybear23 said:
Kernel: CogKernel 4
Scheduler: CFQ
Batch:1007
1200 - 175
1120 - 150
1000 - 0
900 - 0
800 - 0
600 - 0
400 - 0
200 - 0
100 - 0
This is working for me, but I want to run it for a few days to see if I get any freezes, etc before moving up to higher speeds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok....when I see things like this, I'm just...baffled.
A.) Why you only undervolt the very high frequencies that your phone rarely uses? You phone spends most of the time at lower frequencies. Open setCPU go to info, and check time in state. You'll have almost always a 10:1 ratio of time at 100MHz to 1000MHz. You save a lot more battery by undervolting the lower frequencies where your CPU spends more time.
B.) I'm really skeptical of undervolting by 150 and 175MHz at those frequencies. On *stock* voltages, I haven't seen anyone get past 100mV at 1000MHz, but you're -150 at 1120, and -1-freaking-75 at 1200MHz?! If the kernel you're using OVERVOLTS the frequencies (which laststufo had been doing as well) that's about the only way I could imagine you could appear to be undervolting by 175mV @ 1200MHz. Ie, xan's app (last I knew) calculated the UV by the stock voltage, so if the voltage was raised in the kernel, it would look like you're undervolting by 175 when it might only be 100 or 75. Something the whoever you got your kernel from should let people know so they can make informed decisions about whether or not they want to overvolt their CPU.

Kernel: CogKernel 4
Scheduler: CFQ
Batch:1007
1200 - 50
1120 - 50
1000 - 50
900 - 50
800 - 75
600 - 50
400 - 75
200 - 125
100 - 125

Kernel: CogKernel 4
Scheduler: Noop
Batch: 1008
1200 - 0
1120 - 0
1000 - 0
900 - 0
800 - 0
600 - 0
400 - 0
200 - 0
100 - 0
Seems stable. Anything over 1200 on the drop down list instantly freezes, though. :/ I can't see any of these devices running 1.6 anywhere near stable, tbh.

Kernel: glitterballs' CM reoriented
Scheduler: Noop
Batch: 1010
1200 - 100
1000 - 100
800 - 100
400 - 125
200 - 125
100 - 125

Defy Overclock. I can't go above 1000mhz

I'm on PVL-StockPlus based on 4.5.1-134_DFP-231. I came here by restoring PVL-StockPlus system over 4.5.1-134_DFP-231 modded by walter.
I have 4.5.3-109_DPP-11 kernel (I still here from MS2Ginger 3.0, that I had before these two).
Now, the problem is that I can't set custom overclock values. The cpu clock moves between 300mhz-600mhz-1000mhz regardless any overclock.conf setting.
Here is my overclock.conf
Code:
enable 1
load_all 1
scaling 2
clk1 300
clk2 600
clk3 850
clk4 1100
vsel1 20
vsel2 30
vsel3 45
vsel4 62
con_up_threshold 80
con_down_threshold 20
con_freq_step 5
con_sampling_rate 160000
int_min_sample_rate 50000
ond_up_threshold 86
ond_sampling_rate 50000
smt_min_cpu_load 20
smt_max_cpu_load 80
smt_awake_min_freq 200000
smt_sleep_max_freq 200000
smt_up_min_freq 1000000
smt_wakeup_freq 1000000
smt_ramp_up_step 200000
EDIT: The problem isn't go above 1000mhz, is with any setting. I try lowering vsel3 and vsel4 below 1000mhz and any cpu monitor shows 300-600-1000 frecuencies. I can't manage frecuencies and vsels. It's stuck at 300-600-1000.

EtaCarinae said:
I'm on PVL-StockPlus based on 4.5.1-134_DFP-231. I came here by restoring PVL-StockPlus system over 4.5.1-134_DFP-231 modded by walter.
I have 4.5.3-109_DPP-11 kernel (I still here from MS2Ginger 3.0, that I had before these two).
Now, the problem is that I can't set custom overclock values. The cpu clock moves between 300mhz-600mhz-1000mhz regardless any overclock.conf setting.
Here is my overclock.conf
Code:
enable 1
load_all 1
scaling 2
clk1 300
clk2 600
clk3 850
clk4 1100
vsel1 20
vsel2 30
vsel3 45
vsel4 62
con_up_threshold 80
con_down_threshold 20
con_freq_step 5
con_sampling_rate 160000
int_min_sample_rate 50000
ond_up_threshold 86
ond_sampling_rate 50000
smt_min_cpu_load 20
smt_max_cpu_load 80
smt_awake_min_freq 200000
smt_sleep_max_freq 200000
smt_up_min_freq 1000000
smt_wakeup_freq 1000000
smt_ramp_up_step 200000
EDIT: The problem isn't go above 1000mhz, is with any setting. I try lowering vsel3 and vsel4 below 1000mhz and any cpu monitor shows 300-600-1000 frecuencies. I can't manage frecuencies and vsels. It's stuck at 300-600-1000.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried setVsel, good overclocking tool, worked for me on every rom.
defy @ 1200mHz 64vSel...

are you using recovery for overclocking, if yes then make sure that the first option is set to ENABLE or it will only use stock settings.also try setvsel.
Sent from my MB525 using xda premium

Watch this post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1645086
Sent from my MB526 using XDA

Power Profiles for FrancoKernel and Kernel Manager FK app

So I wanted a different thread to make a list of different Power Profiles from users of my custom Kernel. My threads are usually pretty big so it gets hard to manage and this is also a safe place for me to post the defaults I'm using.
I'll review each profile and include your Power Profiles in the app if they seem to make sense.
Please follow the template below when posting. Keep off-topic, requests, etas and useless conversations out of here.
FrancoKernel defaults:
Low Power Cluster
Max CPU freq: 1440000
Min CPU freq: 384000
Governor: interactive
Governor parameters:
above_hispeed_delay 0
go_hispeed_load 100
hispeed_freq 0
target_loads 85 600000:45 787200:50 960000:60 1248000:80
timer_rate 20000
min_sample_time 60000
ignore_hispeed_on_notif 1
max_freq_hysteresis 80000
timer_slack 30000
Max Power Cluster
Max CPU freq: 1824000
Min CPU freq: 633600
Governor: interactive
Governor parameters:
above_hispeed_delay 20000 960000:40000 1248000:20000
go_hispeed_load 90
hispeed_freq 960000
target_loads 90 1248000:95
timer_rate 30000
min_sample_time 20000
ignore_hispeed_on_notif 1
max_freq_hysteresis 80000
timer_slack 30000
Input boost frequency
Low power cluster: 1248000
Performance cluster: 768000
Input boost duration
1500
Join the beta here http://beta.franciscofranco.xyz and starting with the next beta8 profiles will be included and be available to apply in a single tap.
FrancoKernel thread: http://n5x.franciscofranco.xyz

Saved to post profiles from users.

Saved to post profiles from users.

What's your opinion on these?
I'm using the Glassfish 1.2 profile since 2 days with your latest kernel, seems to be working great, cannot give an elaborate opinion yet though, obviously.

sigurd_LU said:
What's your opinion on these?
I'm using the Glassfish 1.2 profile since 2 days with your latest kernel, seems to be working great, cannot give an elaborate opinion yet though, obviously.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think there's a lot overcomplication in all of those, but I'll include one or other because users like to play with 'em.