Database Users

[AnTutu scores Lass ] After install Pure HD rom

help
when I use the original BTU room, I get a score of 15500, after installing the rom I Purelook HD v3.1 Galaxy S IV meet Xperia ZI [MAR 29] Life companion, this score drops to 13,300 why ?

aureliomilitao said:
help
when I use the original BTU room, I get a score of 15500, after installing the rom I Purelook HD v3.1 Galaxy S IV meet Xperia ZI [MAR 29] Life companion, this score drops to 13,300 why ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you want numbers to make you happy use the benchmark app Quadrant.

aureliomilitao said:
help
when I use the original BTU room, I get a score of 15500, after installing the rom I Purelook HD v3.1 Galaxy S IV meet Xperia ZI [MAR 29] Life companion, this score drops to 13,300 why ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks are of no use comparing roms . Roms are not made to increase benchmarks .
Ask the builder of the rom why .
Questions go in Q&A .
jje

An tu tu benchmark results

Hi guys...I've just tested my Samsung Galaxy S GT-I9000 with Super Nexus 2.0 BUILD 4 Rom (Jelly Bean 4.2.2) and Mackay Kernel 0.318 with An tutu Benchmark and I got this great result from the test: score 3441...I know that this is not huge result but compared with the stock Rom of this phone is a great improvement...The average score with stock rom is about 2158...So if you like to speed up your phone use the combination that I've just post it...
Regards to all of you

[Q] How is it possible to run Kitkat on a 290mb ram device?

I thought the minimum was 512mb, do you remove stuff under the hood or how is it done?
Also, how is it possible to run Kitkat on such low internal storage?
I remember a month ago nobody even thought of Kitkat but then androidarmv6 came in

Its possible
galaxyYtester said:
I thought the minimum was 512mb, do you remove stuff under the hood or how is it done?
Also, how is it possible to run Kitkat on such low internal storage?
I remember a month ago nobody even thought of Kitkat but then androidarmv6 came in
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of cource, it is possible! Our orginal RAM is 0.38 GB, but only 290 MB is user available! Even device than galaxy Y runs kitkat almost stable like Galaxy 5!
Infact, 500 MB RAM is used to run KK flawlesslt!

galaxyYtester said:
I thought the minimum was 512mb, do you remove stuff under the hood or how is it done?
Also, how is it possible to run Kitkat on such low internal storage?
I remember a month ago nobody even thought of Kitkat but then androidarmv6 came in
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think not
Android Jelly Bean Smartphone with 512MB of RAM can sometimes make the performance of the smartphone to be slow, let alone KitKat on 300MB RAM?
Sorry for bad english

I'm currently running KitKat on my TassVe, which is essentially a Totoro under a Galaxy Mini shell, and I can say that it's smooth most of the time. Typing can be a bit laggy, and some apps (such as Titanium Backup) can take a long time to boot. But overall still smooth enough for daily use. Only complaint is the epic power consumption of the ROM.
Oh and this is the experimental build. Before asking, no, I will not provide links to it.

Nexus 4 5.1 Kernel W/ Overclock possibilities?

I want to know if exists a kernel with good performance and reliability with overclock possibilities and DT2W on the "market" did anyone found a good one? i want a good kernel specially for gaming and reliability and DT2W if is possible , thank you very much !
EDIT: I tried a benchmark tool but i forgot to close ~6 Apps lol ,bellow is the result , good or not for 5.1 Stock W/ Stock kernel?

No one know a good kernel? come on guys , i trought you guys are specialists .. :silly:

Tried some kernels like AK kernel & franco kernel but both of them are unstable , at least on stock 5.1 ... can anyone please reccomend me a good , stable one ?

I'd suggest you Quanta kernel

TheGrinder77 said:
I'd suggest you Quanta kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply bud , i want to use a stable one with overclock possibilities , did you use/used it? could you overclock the device with the kernel installed? what about the battery life , i preffer to ask before installing one wich possibly could not be good for the device needs ..

Yeah I'm currently using it with chroma rom.. You can overclock up to 1728mhz but personally I prefer underclocking for great battery life (more than 5h SOT)

Ok , so i flashed the Quanta V3 then tuned with Kernel Adiutor , runned a AnTuTu benchmark , low score ( about 26.600 ) then Quadrant Standard ( 5.713 max ) then Vellamo ( 794 on multicore ) 891 on metal ... i don't know what's wrong .. i overclocked it , changed the governor to performance , locked the frequency , upvolting , nothing , maybe a bit higher score than previsourious ... the best performance i got was with the AK kernel ( see the pic below ) that's the highest score i ever got i don't know what's wrong , maybe because i'm using stock rom? i don't like custom roms not on this phone , at least ... should i use a stock based modified kernel for 5.1.0 ?

Just scored 29999 on antutu by only changing max frequency to 1728mhz and governor to interactive. If I remember correctly AK has higher overclock frequencies so that could be the reason for higher scores

TheGrinder77 said:
Just scored 29999 on antutu by only changing max frequency to 1728mhz and governor to interactive. If I remember correctly AK has higher overclock frequencies so that could be the reason for higher scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes , on AK you can overclock up to 1.944 ghz but it drains much more battery than Quanta , i think it doesen't exist a good kernel a reliable one ... for this momment i preffer stock kernel with stock rom , i don't like custom roms because them are so slow and unstable , the kernels eat to much battery , that's why stock is better here ...

Why don't we have CM11 for our LG G Pad 7?

Hi.. so I have been using my LG G Pad 7.0 v400 for the past 3 months and I would like to share my thoughts about what I have been using
My tablet came with stock 4.4.2 KitKat which is pretty good when it comes to features.. But speaking about performance.. It may not be the best out there..
I rooted it and modified it as much as I could.. Deleted so many stock not useful apps and installed Xposed with a lot of modules but it is still not as I expected.. I installed kernel auditor and put CPU and GPU governors as "performance".. It got better but then again.. Not as I expected..
Speaking about CM12.1 (CAF by SultanXDA) it was the best performance experience.. Very fast and smooth and it has almost no bugs at all.. Games are great and everything seemed to be amazing.. But the huge issue I faced was the internal memory.. ART uses so much more money than Dalvic (for example Facebook app is 225 MB in lollipop.. 35 MB in KitKat [on Dalvic]) so I had to go back to the laggy KikKat again..
I didn't try stock 5.0.2 well because it's not 5.1.1 and it has the same internal memory issue.. (same thing about CM13)
I know you can just say use Link2SD and move your apps.. Ok but that's not what I am looking for..
Why don't we have a stable CM11 (4.4.4) with great performance and enough internal memory? It may sound weird since we already have CM13 but I really think that CM11 will be the best experience for our lovely tablet..
Thanks for reading this.. Tell me what you think.. Have a good time