Related
any way we can port tizen or web os to galaxy y???
both are open source
https://developer.tizen.org/
webos like feature is currently in devlopmnt.
I hav talked to evanlocked for a projct and webos feauture .he may hav a look into this mttr. :/
btw do any other Android devices have a working port of webos/tizen?
nikufellow said:
btw do any other Android devices have a working port of webos/tizen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no none other device have web os or tizen os
btw firefox os is also in the line
nikufellow said:
btw do any other Android devices have a working port of webos/tizen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes,
the galaxy nexus and samsung tab 2 has beta ports of webOS,
deathnotice01 said:
yes,
the galaxy nexus and samsung tab 2 has beta ports of webOS,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh okay
Dear Developers,
My Name is M.Waqar-ul-Hassan, i been using SGY s5360 since two years, and installed several Custom Roms by XDA (Thanks Alot !!).
but for i m searching is TABLET UI with in SGY s5360. i don't have ability to develop a ROM myself coz i don't know something about ROM development.
it is my Plea to all Developers in XDA to please develop an image like TABLET UI of SGY s5360.
Thanks and Good Luck.
M.Waqar-ul-hassan said:
Dear Developers,
My Name is M.Waqar-ul-Hassan, i been using SGY s5360 since two years, and installed several Custom Roms by XDA (Thanks Alot !!).
but for i m searching is TABLET UI with in SGY s5360. i don't have ability to develop a ROM myself coz i don't know something about ROM development.
it is my Plea to all Developers in XDA to please develop an image like TABLET UI of SGY s5360.
Thanks and Good Luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You want 7-inch tablet UI on 3-inch mobile.....lol
Yes dear brother
hmm... i think it is possible and it'll make more space on screen of SGY.! what do you think..
Galaxy y is cheap phone with little screen and old bcm chip,paranoid and other tablet for galaxy s3,htc one
Отправлено с моего GT-I9300 через Tapatalk
We can't lower the DPI anymore on galaxy y,
The 120 is the lowest possible for ldpi
Get any lower then the apps will crash and system will not function.
I tried it before, no use in trying again
This post is in compliance with the national potato safety regulation.
[Galaxy S 4 LTE]
Your poll is pointless. What you are asking doesnt depend on kernel.
Tablet UI , huh ?
You can install CM 7 and flash some enhancements (such as tablet tweaks)
or
You can install Paranoid Rom by evanlocked . But this rom is not suitable for daily use.
U u can wait for a rom that is coming with it...
Not mine
Pinadala galing sa aking MuffinS5360 gamit ang Tapatalk 2
Would be hard to navigate on the SGY's small screen (Devs even say its not possible)
IanDrexP said:
Would be hard to navigate on the SGY's small screen (Devs even say its not possible)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its already done...but no nav bar/on screen buttons
Pinadala galing sa aking MuffinS5360 gamit ang Tapatalk 2
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2134382
the best theme ever i have used, try it:silly:
Recently, a XDA member ported CM11 to galaxy ace! and heard that it will soon be available for other low end devices like Mini, Fit, etc!
So, I wonder if it is possible for Hi-Fi Devs to make CM11 just boot on our device (Just like CM9)?
lionelsuyog said:
Recently, a XDA member ported CM11 to galaxy ace! and heard that it will soon be available for other low end devices like Mini, Fit, etc!
So, I wonder if it is possible for Hi-Fi Devs to make CM11 just boot on our device (Just like CM9)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think no.
Sent from my GT-S5300 using Tapatalk 0.01a
1. Love doesn't need any reason.
2. Wanna speed up 3G (not 4G LTE)?
Here it is:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2586876
lionelsuyog said:
Recently, a XDA member ported CM11 to galaxy ace! and heard that it will soon be available for other low end devices like Mini, Fit, etc!
So, I wonder if it is possible for Hi-Fi Devs to make CM11 just boot on our device (Just like CM9)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its time wasting. We can't make it work and stable without drivers, so no need for it and we have to get satisfaction with with cm and half working cm
Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk 2
galaxy mini, gio and ace have cm11 but they are qualcom powered and not broadcom, so I think no...
Gesendet von meinem LG-P880 mit Tapatalk
Even Galaxy 5 which is less powerful than galaxy Y has CM10! I feel so sad of myself!
nbock97 said:
galaxy mini, gio and ace have cm11 but they are qualcom powered and not broadcom, so I think no...
Gesendet von meinem LG-P880 mit Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Broadcom distributed the driver for CM7! Now, lets force them to release drivers for CM11! :silly:
But How?
lionelsuyog said:
Broadcom distributed the driver for CM7! Now, lets force them to release drivers for CM11! :silly:
But How?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. The devs are forking the drivers from an Alcatel phone with BCM21553 SoC running vanila (AOSP) Android 2.3.7 .
Sent from HKV (allwinner a13) 7" tab using Tapatalk 4
luqman98 said:
No. The devs are forking the drivers from an Alcatel phone with BCM21553 SoC running vanila (AOSP) Android 2.3.7 .
Sent from HKV (allwinner a13) 7" tab using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder how many devs are still working on it?
HnnnnnnnnmnHmmmmmmmmGpuuuuuuuuuuuuu
DeniablySam said:
I wonder how many devs are still working on it?
HnnnnnnnnmnHmmmmmmmmGpuuuuuuuuuuuuu
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually,devs are working on it...I got a pm by lopicl.00 that he is building CMX for tassve and totoro as soon as he completes the builds he will give me for testing. Please be patient,if you cannot,buy a new device rather
And get a Stable CM11
Broadcom has cheated us too,the EGL Drivers which they gave us didn't worked..so devs working hard on it.Let them take their own time and let's be patient till then
Regards
lionelsuyog said:
Recently, a XDA member ported CM11 to galaxy ace! and heard that it will soon be available for other low end devices like Mini, Fit, etc!
So, I wonder if it is possible for Hi-Fi Devs to make CM11 just boot on our device (Just like CM9)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BAD IDEA!
lets first have stable & working cm7,9,10 on our device..... then we should go for CM 11 .....
link for CM11 for Galaxy Y:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2766229
NaDSJR said:
link for CM11 for Galaxy Y:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2766229
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, see the date of thread!
It was posted before CM11 development started on galaxy Y!
So, I want so much a new CyanogenMod port for the Galaxy Y
Can anyone port the new CMs (10.1, 10.2, 11) for the Galaxy Y ?
Please :X
Thanks!
--- Galaxy Y --- CM7 by PsychoGame
---Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 --- Stockrom v5
K3VYNC said:
So, I want so much a new CyanogenMod port for the Galaxy Y
Can anyone port the new CMs (10.1, 10.2, 11) for the Galaxy Y ?
Please :X
Thanks!
--- Galaxy Y --- CM7 by PsychoGame
---Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 --- Stockrom v5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are not possible as the broadcom is not releasing our device drivers.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using Tapatalk 2
K3VYNC said:
So, I want so much a new CyanogenMod port for the Galaxy Y
Can anyone port the new CMs (10.1, 10.2, 11) for the Galaxy Y ?
Please :X
Thanks!
--- Galaxy Y --- CM7 by PsychoGame
---Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 --- Stockrom v5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IF U WANT CYANOGEN MOD TO BE PORTED
U HAVE TO FORCE BROADCOM TO RELEASE DRIVERS
SIGN THIS PETITION FOR THIS AND ALSO SPREAD THE WORD
https://www.change.org/petitions/broadcom-release-the-driver-source-of-gpu-and-cpu-for-bcm21553-devices
Hopeless
abhishekr700 said:
IF U WANT CYANOGEN MOD TO BE PORTED
U HAVE TO FORCE BROADCOM TO RELEASE DRIVERS
SIGN THIS PETITION FOR THIS AND ALSO SPREAD THE WORD
https://www.change.org/petitions/broadcom-release-the-driver-source-of-gpu-and-cpu-for-bcm21553-devices
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think there will be no use even if Broadcom releases the driver sources.
It is too late. It is because people are migrating from Samsung Galaxy Y and buying some other device that has cool developments.
There are few chances that they will return to this device.
the_pirate_predator said:
I think there will be no use even if Broadcom releases the driver sources.
It is too late. It is because people are migrating from Samsung Galaxy Y and buying some other device that has cool developments.
There are few chances that they will return to this device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive built a solid concrete hope that they wont even care
HnnnnnnnnmnHmmmmmmmmGpuuuuuuuuuuuuu
All request worthless....I think Broadcom delete the source of driver from its DB.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2454937
Is this the latest drivers ?
Sent from my SM-T210 using xda app-developers app
K3VYNC said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2454937
Is this the latest drivers ?
Sent from my SM-T210 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they were test binaries that never worked properly
Answer
K3VYNC said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2454937
Is this the latest drivers ?
Sent from my SM-T210 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I need not reply for the post. The answer is in the same link that you have provided. Read the reply posts in that thread and you will come to know yourself!!
And to think that other companies are actually helping users, like Motorola releasing the source code of the RAZR D3.
And people are to blame Google because of fragmentation when companies themselves help fragmentation happen.
Galaxy Y can't receive real Jelly Bean. All ROMS you see like JellyBlast and Nemesis and many more are stock-based. The only different ROM that is different is CyanogenMod 7, which is actually 2.3.7 instead of stock 2.3.6 .
Galaxy Y cannot receive a Jelly Bean build. Even if it ever receives a ported build, it might be full of bugs. For example, CyanogenMod 9 is said to be real ICS but it's full of bugs.Most ROMS that appear as ICS+ are probably themed, or tweaked with build.prop editor
I wish the developers are doing the best in order to satisfy you and many other Galaxy Y users.
Sent from my P3110 using xda premium
Yes, I will not undo my galaxy y ... something like the specific kernel that uses biel in your CM9 Beta 1 may serve in the future. Galaxy Y has served for many entering the world of android and learn about the advanced, which can be used in future smartphones. One day will repeat a similar story that no one will want to support us.
Its long back since I forgot the dream of ICS+. People don't waste your time on such threads. Better get a new phone, never go for Broadcom. You will be happy and get every Android version update.
(Samsung Galaxy SL, released in 2011 like SGY, got stable Kitkat and not to forget nexus phones who have seen every android version)
We already have sent petition from change.org but
Broadcom will never release required Libraries (I wonder why people mistake and call it "drivers")
and no stable version will be possible.
I am not pessimist, neither I have lost hope (I am personally trying to fix things) but I am just being realistic.
Sent from my GT-S5360 Gadget of Mass Destruction by xda-app
using CWM........Busybox commands........ No I use my hands
Nah :/
K3VYNC said:
So, I want so much a new CyanogenMod port for the Galaxy Y
Can anyone port the new CMs (10.1, 10.2, 11) for the Galaxy Y ?
Please :X
Thanks!
--- Galaxy Y --- CM7 by PsychoGame
---Galaxy Tab 3 7.0 --- Stockrom v5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We dont even have stable CM 9 forget later CM's and we will not be having it until devs get libraries
ritikchanna said:
We dont even have stable CM 9 forget later CM's and we will not be having it until devs get libraries
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
devs get libraries ? haha the drivers come from broadcom and even the best devs in galaxy y section cant build it
so cm7 and AOSP is now all we have. dont set your hope too high on cm9 or later XD
Mranggapo said:
devs get libraries ? haha the drivers come from broadcom and even the best devs in galaxy y section cant build it
so cm7 and AOSP is now all we have. dont set your hope too high on cm9 or later XD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont underestimate the devs out there ..Few months back CM 7.2 was not stable but now is and so will be CM 9 if they get the drivers/libraries
ritikchanna said:
if they get the drivers/libraries
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's one very big if, bro.
Sent from my CM7 GT-S5570I
NightRaven49 said:
That's one very big if, bro.
Sent from my CM7 GT-S5570I
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but it is still a if .
Though chances are very low but there are still chances
ritikchanna said:
Dont underestimate the devs out there ..Few months back CM 7.2 was not stable but now is and so will be CM 9 if they get the drivers/libraries
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is like youre dreamin, most of our old devs were migrated to newer devices. Cm9 for galaxy Y is just like dream.
To the people who are going to port the Galaxy S8 and Note 8 to the Note 4. Please for the love of god do not integrate root in the ROMS so that we can use android pay and Pokemon go. Also leave instructions for us to customize the ROM from WIN-RAR so that we wont need to install root into our devices. Thank you
For the last time.. THE GALAXY NOTE 4 DOES NOT BECOME A NOUGAT UPDATE! You can NOT migrate 7.0 Firmeware to 6.0.1 if the hardware is different!
viewsfromthepi said:
To the people who are going to port the Galaxy S8 and Note 8 to the Note 4. Please for the love of god do not integrate root in the ROMS so that we can use android pay and Pokemon go. Also leave instructions for us to customize the ROM from WIN-RAR so that we wont need to install root into our devices. Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then don't bother yourself expecting bro
Sent from my SM-N9200 using Tapatalk
rbngio said:
For the last time.. THE GALAXY NOTE 4 DOES NOT BECOME A NOUGAT UPDATE! You can NOT migrate 7.0 Firmeware to 6.0.1 if the hardware is different!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im confused. If the Note 2 can get a port of Android N
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-2/orig-development/rom-cyanogenmod-14-0-n7100-t3487568
then how come the Note 4 wont get a ported Galaxy S8 or Note 8 ROM with Android N since they are porting them with Android M
viewsfromthepi said:
To the people who are going to port the Galaxy S8 and Note 8 to the Note 4. Please for the love of god do not integrate root in the ROMS so that we can use android pay and Pokemon go. Also leave instructions for us to customize the ROM from WIN-RAR so that we wont need to install root into our devices. Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do not post request in the development threads please. You are more than welcone to port the S8 and Note 8 when they are released yourself. Xda isn't a place to come and get free stuff to make your phone cool, it's a place for developers to come together and share idea's and work
Regards
Sawdoctor
viewsfromthepi said:
Im confused. If the Note 2 can get a port of Android N
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-2/orig-development/rom-cyanogenmod-14-0-n7100-t3487568
then how come the Note 4 wont get a ported Galaxy S8 or Note 8 ROM with Android N since they are porting them with Android M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AOSP roms are easy to port cause they are open source "Android Open Source Project" even the s4 has aosp android n. But touchwiz roms are a totally different story
vishudha98 said:
AOSP roms are easy to port cause they are open source "Android Open Source Project" even the s4 has aosp android n. But touchwiz roms are a totally different story
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then how the Note 3 has a Note 7 port based on android marshmallow when it's last update was lollipop? I don't see why this is different from that...
JuanWilliman said:
Then how the Note 3 has a Note 7 port based on android marshmallow when it's last update was lollipop? I don't see why this is different from that...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are right, it isnt completely impossible.
But if you observe, note 3 has more active developers than note 4.
The renowned darkera13 has been working on note 3since the very beginning, even aryamod.
As for note 4, the best is aurora and norma.
Anyways, even if someone is able to port it, forget about those stupid requests, that the OP
has made.
Reporting Via N910G.
yashthemw said:
You are right, it isnt completely impossible.
But if you observe, note 3 has more active developers than note 4.
The renowned darkera13 has been working on note 3since the very beginning, even aryamod.
As for note 4, the best is aurora and norma.
Anyways, even if someone is able to port it, forget about those stupid requests, that the OP
has made.
Reporting Via N910G.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Evidence shows that the migration to Note 4 (darkera13):fingers-crossed:
+ N910S/K/L
https://www.androidfilehost.com/?w=files&flid=80521