Related
I am running CM6 A013 with oc-legend-cm-2.6.29.6 kernel. Everything seems to be working just fine except for the wifi. Has anyone gotten the wifi to work with the oc kernels?
I read in another thread that we could take the wlan.ko file from an old ROM. Does anyone have a copy of this file or would anyone be willing to pull the file so that I can test it? I really appreciate it.
same situation here. neither kernels work with cm6's wifi and hotspot. can someone fix this please! i really want my wifi back! i didnt do a backup before hand!
Im looking at this and it looks easier than just replacing the entire kernel like you guys did, read here from that guy's post above:
"How to do it for kernel_legend_13be9c9c:
At first, you should read zanfur's post and his patch.
I just modified two tables in acpuclock-arm11.c excluding his having written.
1. modify cpufreq.c to let SetCPU to access freq tables
2. modify acpuclock-arm11.c to let HTC Legend be able to overclocking
3. modify msm7227_defconfig to disable PERFLOCK [optional]
You might not need modify defconfig when you use SetCPU which can purchase in Android Market.
SetCPU can disable PERFLOCK by setting. ([menu] -> [Perflock Disabler])"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, with that said, I would take that file or file(s) and replace them with the ones in our current kernel made for our phone... might work and your wifi won't be broken.
You guys are running a kernel made for a different device.
could some one say in plain english the exact steps to get the old kernel back? the one from CM6
lilhaiti said:
I am running CM6 A013 with oc-legend-cm-2.6.29.6 kernel. Everything seems to be working just fine except for the wifi. Has anyone gotten the wifi to work with the oc kernels?
I read in another thread that we could take the wlan.ko file from an old ROM. Does anyone have a copy of this file or would anyone be willing to pull the file so that I can test it? I really appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That kernel is not built for our wifi chip. The kernel needs to be built for the BCM chipset and not the TI. Further, the wifi module needs to be in sync with the kernel build. Android 101.
I am not sure what we are going to gain from overclocking. There just doesn't seem to be any end goal, other than bragging rights on a benchmark where the Aria can only hope to be among the best of the mediocre CPUs. If it's for flash - forget it. We don't have the instruction set required in the CPU. The downside is the potential to add instability and confuse test results for mods that can actually increase functionality.
I like overclocking and running a couple benchmarks once in a while. For day to day use I'm more interested in downclocking but only if it can increase battery life.
Sent from my HTC Liberty using XDA App
the extra speed of the OC makes a big different on the games, that's the reason I like it... Games run smoother with the OC kernel.... do the test.. try to run Abduction with the stock Kernel for a while and then with the OC.. you'll see the difference... also Live Wallpapers with the stock kernel is choppy... it is smooth with the OC.
Hell my nexus one has been over clocked since the day I got it (rooted that same day ) not that a 1ghz phone really needs it. Well the Nexus One maybe for gaming but my Captivate and Vibrant on the other hand doesn't need it period. You won't get better performance gaming with any other android handset out there to date. Still my Captivate is over clocked to 1.2ghz lol. Like I say there's something fun about pushing the limits.
It really just another thing to tweak and play around with on your device. It's always fun to push the limits.
There are several reason why I would like to overclock. 1. The 3D photo gallery loads photos really slow with the stock kernel, but with an overclocked kernel the pics loaded very quickly. 2. It's nice to run a 3D game or two without chopping. Just to name a couple. It would be nice to have an Aria kernel that works with all of the phones hardware. And showing off benchmark number is nice as well.
This is a kernel based on Captivate (i897) KB1 source.
I consider this kernel still in beta as I haven't run it as a daily driver much yet. I did do some testing with it though and it's been stable so far.
Normal disclaimer about you flashing at your own risk <here>.
What's in it?
Boosted in call volume
Applied hardcore's mic bias tweaks
Jhash updated to jhash3
Lowmemorykiller upgraded for TinyRCU compatability from http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/common.git;a=commitdiff;h=5545554aac04918ece318270d63cbfcb015577a9
ext4 patched and upgraded from http://www2.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/tytso/ext4-patches/
Kernel hz set to 100
Tiny RCU patched and upgraded from http://android.git.kernel.org/?p=kernel/common.git;a=commit;h=9b1d82fa1611706fa7ee1505f290160a18caf95d
Supercurio's voodoo lagfix
Supercurio's voodoo sound v6
Neldar's backlighnotification 2.3 built in from https://github.com/project-voodoo/backlightnotification/tree/master/kernel_patches/
Compiled using codesourcery 2010.09.51 tool chain which should be faster and more battery efficient
Android_Logger (Logcat) disabled by default - enable via adding an empty file on the internal sd card named enable_debug
TUN support (needs tested)
CWM v2.5.1.3 (from voodoo lagfix)
10 point multi touch support
enabled CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT for fugu tweaks compatability
Memory configs:
CONFIG_ANDROID_PMEM_MEMSIZE_PMEM=2048
CONFIG_ANDROID_PMEM_MEMSIZE_PMEM_GPU1=4096
CONFIG_ANDROID_PMEM_MEMSIZE_PMEM_ADSP=1500
CONFIG_WLAN_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_BCM=256
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMC0=12288
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMC1=1024
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMC2=12288
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_MFC0=32768
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_MFC1=32768
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_TEXSTREAM=10240
CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_MEMSIZE_FIMD=3072
Source will be in github as soon as i can get it there.
Thanks to:
supercurio
chrisryn
existz
xcaliburinhand
hardcore
for either the help with source or the help with questions.
If I've missed anyone I apologize and will add you if you remind me.
One last thing I guess... I do this as a hobby, it's not my life.
Reserved for updates.
Was literally just about to reply in your other skullcap kernel thread that I'd be willing to check out your KB1 kernel. Figured I'd search your posts first and lo and behold...
Downloaded.
Definitely looks good, downloaded and will flash soon. I like it! Battery efficient?
Haloruler64 said:
Definitely looks good, downloaded and will flash soon. I like it! Battery efficient?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Should be, there are battery saving tweaks in the code and the init files.
Let me/us know how it does for you.
Flashed
Voodoo app says kernel doesn't support extended sound controls
Weird behavior in Quadrant: froze on CPU 0/12, jumped to 10/12 on first run (probably anomaly)
You might wanna remove the FPS cap, just because
Quadrant scores hover around 1450.. bit low. eXistZ gets 1500, OverStock 1600. Not important, more like IDGAF, just saying though
Phone got a bit laggy, not sure if it's the kernel though. Animations are laggy....
For now back to eXistZ for Voodoo Sound... will flash an update
Just tried flashing this, but when opening up Voodoo Control it says that the Kernel doesn't support Voodoo Sound.
Anyone else having this issue?
EDIT: ^ ^ must have been posting at the same time...
pinoymutt said:
Just tried flashing this, but when opening up Voodoo Control it says that the Kernel doesn't support Voodoo Sound.
Anyone else having this issue?
EDIT: ^ ^ must have been posting at the same time...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uh ohh..that may just be my inability to upload the right file
checking now
I cleared RAM, i had 155 used. Under eXistZ, I have 129MB RAM after clear. Just bringing this up.
Sorry x 1000 guys
I modified my build script while I was testing today and it wasn't updating the kernel in the flash.
The zip in the OP is the correct one WITH voodoo sound now.
Haloruler64 said:
I cleared RAM, i had 155 used. Under eXistZ, I have 129MB RAM after clear. Just bringing this up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I can take a look at what all is in mem and see what I can trim.
Thanks for your work man!
great kernel so far very smooth and great call quality. only bug i noticed is when i was in recovery i went to flash another kb1 build rom (fusion) i wiped dalvik and then i got a message my back button was disabled and also i could not highlight any options i had to 3 button back into recovery then all was well. not a big deal to me but it might freak some people out just letting u know. good work man
Nice work.. i'm currently running Existz kernel and get great results with it...
Does this kernel have Voodoo Color & Sharpness ? if not, any plans to put it in ?
second question, with Existz kernel that already has voodoo lagfix, i can just flash this kernel without disabling lagfix right ?
Thanks !
TheGrub said:
Nice work.. i'm currently running Existz kernel and get great results with it...
Does this kernel have Voodoo Color & Sharpness ? if not, any plans to put it in ?
second question, with Existz kernel that already has voodoo lagfix, i can just flash this kernel without disabling lagfix right ?
Thanks !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do plan on taking a look at the color and sharpness. I just never "needed" it for myself so it was low on my list.
You don't have to disable lagfix. Since both kernels support it each one will recognize it no problem.
Cool... good to know as it does make a nice difference on our beautiful amoled screens!!
Looking forward to this new kernel!!
Thanks
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I896 using Tapatalk
Hey, so eXistZ kernel doesn't provide the best battery life, and I REALLY wanna hit up your kernel! Can you do me a favor and add a lower minimum brightness tweak? Also take a look at OverStock for FPS limit remover and such? OverStock seems to have great performance, and I haven't used your kernel enough to compare The min brightness tweak would make this a MUST have!
Also I know this is the wrong place for this, but does anyone know anything about something I heard about KB1 kernels being compatible with i9000 modems? You always needed to pair i9000 modem and kernel, but I heard somewhere you can use i9000 modems with KB1 kernels for some reason.
Haloruler64 said:
Hey, so eXistZ kernel doesn't provide the best battery life, and I REALLY wanna hit up your kernel! Can you do me a favor and add a lower minimum brightness tweak? Also take a look at OverStock for FPS limit remover and such? OverStock seems to have great performance, and I haven't used your kernel enough to compare The min brightness tweak would make this a MUST have!
Also I know this is the wrong place for this, but does anyone know anything about something I heard about KB1 kernels being compatible with i9000 modems? You always needed to pair i9000 modem and kernel, but I heard somewhere you can use i9000 modems with KB1 kernels for some reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for the minimum brightness tweak.
The Overstock 1.0 KB1 kernel had a bug that let it work with i9000 modems, but not Captivate modems. It was fixed in 1.1, but cmenard supposedly was researching to see if he could get it working with any modem. That was a while ago, haven't seen anything on it for almost 2 weeks.
Discontinued​Since we don't have any modules devs here, I'm sorry to say this project is discontinued.
If any devs want to develop on these 2 modules, PM me please
Sam.
Hi.
Intro:
This is base on X8 modules by doixanh(Thanks!)
Since X8 and Galaxy Ace are using same CPU(MSM7227), so we just need to recompile it to make it compatible to Ace.
*I'm not using Ace, so I can't test with your hardware.
However, I'm don't know how to modify this modules, so devs is needed.
Downloads:
Since it is under construction, so only there's original modules can be downloaded.
(See attachments below)
Requirements:
Rooted
Dare!
Installation:
TBA.
Disclaimers:
These modules is dangerous! It may cause severe damage to your hardware. I'm not responsible if this module kills your lovely phone. Use it at your own risk!
Thanks:
-doixanh for this x8oc/x8uv modules.
Reserve for Change Log
Humm Interesting!
samyeung97hk said:
Hi.
Intro:
This is base on X8 Overclock modules by doixanh(Thanks!)
Since X8 and Galaxy Ace are using same CPU(MSM7227), so we just need to recompile it to make it compatible to Ace.
However, I'm don't know how to modify this modules, so devs is needed.
Downloads:
Since it is under construction, so only there's x8oc.ko v004(original module) can be downloaded.
(See attachments below)
Requirements:
Rooted
Dare!
Installation:
TBA.
Disclaimers:
This modules is dangerous! It may cause severe damage to your hardware. I'm not responsible if this module kills your lovely phone. Use it at your own risk!
Thanks:
-doixanh for this x8oc modules.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you try already?
vlc_marcos said:
did you try already?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U read it?
Since X8 and Galaxy Ace are using same CPU(MSM7227), so we just need to recompile it to make it compatible to Ace.
vlc_marcos said:
did you try already?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, cause I don't have Ace (read the Intro please)
This requires a brave tester after the modules have been recompiled. I think volunteers may be hard to find provided the risk involved haha
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
Maybe for recompiling we can ask our hero Ketut.Kumajaya?
Haha, we need a dev to recompile it first.
FINALLY! maybe with a modified from this module, galaxy ace can be undervolting instead overclocking?
I really want my ace battery lasting longer
Then we need the x8 underclock modules too for people who wants to uv without oc.
b00bs said:
FINALLY! maybe with a modified from this module, galaxy ace can be undervolting instead overclocking?
I really want my ace battery lasting longer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
X8 have an UV module too ! maYbe we can use that too.
consegregate said:
Then we need the x8 underclock modules too for people who wants to uv without oc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats exactly what i've been thinking of
i definitely doesnt want to overclock, but if undervolt, count me in
Yes, we could made a Undervolt module instead of overclock.
But there's an important problem: We need devs!
I wish coolya was here :'(
Sorry, but with this modules, we are as near as with Optimus One kernel patches.
This phone has a 800 MHz CPU and uses different clocking in order to work at such speed, while X8 and Optimus One have a 600 MHz CPU.
Lots of testing should be done in order to get the clocking specs that give stable overclocking on this phone, because I think it has not been done before on this CPU.
I've tried some hacks to get overclocking, but I only got bootloops and unstability. My sources for the kernel are on GitHub (see my signature), you may also find my tests on Overclocking in commit history.
Anyway, I'm not a kernel developer, so It would be great if someone with more experience could make some testing. Obviously, someone in possesion of this phone or one of the few that uses the same processor (MSM7227-Turbo).
Not interested in overclock, maybe undervoltage. Without overclock sometimes the back cover is hot, why people think to overclock?
answer to your question...
ketut.kumajaya said:
Not interested in overclock, maybe undervoltage. Without overclock sometimes the back cover is hot, why people think to overclock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think different users have different requirements as per their uses and if you think its useless doesn't means that it is actually useless...
you need battery life doesn't means that others too want it. maybe they want to run heavy applications smoother...
thats why they think to overclock.
guddu2011 said:
I think different users have different requirements as per their uses and if you think its useless doesn't means that it is actually useless...
you need battery life doesn't means that others too want it. maybe they want to run heavy applications smoother...
thats why they think to overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's just my opinion. If I need a performance beyond my device specification, I will buy a better product. Install a better software and safe tweaking on my existing device is another solution.
ketut.kumajaya said:
That's just my opinion. If I need a performance beyond my device specification, I will buy a better product. Install a better software and safe tweaking on my existing device is another solution.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but I don't think that all thinks like you, i think its their wish to choose what they want.
and yes, its their opinion.
Designed for honeycomb 3.2+ and Iconia a500 only.
Includes:
Sched autogroup
Undervolted & overclocked up to 1646mhz (is set at 1000mhz on boot overclock with setcpu as desired) sweet spot for max stability seems to be ~1504mhz.
GPU overclocked to 133% of stock
JCRU
VR io-scheduler (sio & bfq are included)
Option & cifs & tun & UTF8 are compiled in
Smartassv2 & lagfree gov (interactive as default)
Correctly reports sn & snid for full gameloft compatibility
Mass storage enabled (use script included)
Patched ufsd.ko (acer's ntfs module) for use with 2.6.36.4+ kernel
Most debugging is turned off
Wifi sleep of death is fixed
Many other performance and upstream tegra 2 patches see github for full list.
Suggestions for best performance:
In init.picasso.rc in boot.img's ramdisk make these modifications for best I/O performance on ext4
Code:
mount ext4 /dev/block/mmcblk0p3 /system wait ro noatime nodiratime
mount ext4 /dev/block/mmcblk0p8 /data wait noatime nosuid nodev nodiratime noauto_da_alloc
mount ext4 /dev/block/mmcblk0p4 /cache wait noatime nosuid nodev nodiratime noauto_da_alloc
mount ext4 /dev/block/mmcblk0p6 /system/vendor wait ro noatime nodiratime
The above could also be changed by an init.d script.
Use of mass storage:
From a root # shell with terminal emulator or from adb shell:
Code:
mass_storage on -- to enable
mass_storage off -- to disable
Special Note:
Acer 3.2's kernel source has the "Insert Sim" warning on lock screen
It can be disabled by adding ro.carrier=wifi-only to your /system/build.prop
Kernel is packaged in koush's anykernel so it will replace the kernel & ko's only keeping your ramdisk unmodified for maximum compatibility with a wide variety of roms.
Special Thanks:
Richard Trip for his Iconia kernel source & overclocking code
Caz70 for the snid & sn framework (I made a small change to get it 100%)
GPL source use devel2 branch
Download section:
iconia_gnm_rc1.zip
md5sum e002e5b72478302551479a3a0353cb9b iconia_gnm_rc1.zip
iconia_gnm_rc2.zip
md5sum b7d5c7b7e518b07e5f213bc02ef17edc iconia_gnm_rc2.zip
Changelog
rc2
Updated drivers from a200 source
Fixed kernel crash from usb/ehci
Updated bcm4329 from a200 src now has wifi auto tx-power mode for power savings.
Fix potential null causing kernel crash.
Wifi will now fully power off after a few minutes if wifi-off when screen off is selected.
Fixed wired jack resume.
A pity we can't have some love for A501 tablet owners...
I used to use your Imagio Roms. Great to see you here. I still see some of those wm 6.5 features just making their way to Android.
Hmmmm.... I suppose this kernel will run on a 501 Dres? I know you said 500, but I suppose it's because you couldn't test it?
But it's going to depend on how low you under-volted the frequencies. If it's too low, it will freeze the 501 when on internal 3g.
So if you were to compare frequencies and voltage, which version of RTripp's kernel would you compare it with. As anything higher than his 3.4+, will freeze the 501 eventually.
But, it's damn nice to see a new kernel here at xda.
This looks great. How did you overclock the GPU?
Moscow Desire said:
Hmmmm.... I suppose this kernel will run on a 501 Dres? I know you said 500, but I suppose it's because you couldn't test it?
But it's going to depend on how low you under-volted the frequencies. If it's too low, it will freeze the 501 when on internal 3g.
So if you were to compare frequencies and voltage, which version of RTripp's kernel would you compare it with. As anything higher than his 3.4+, will freeze the 501 eventually.
But, it's damn nice to see a new kernel here at xda.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you give me the voltages @freqs from that kernel that work on a501. You can get them easily from setcpu voltage tab
drellisdee said:
Can you give me the voltages @freqs from that kernel that work on a501. You can get them easily from setcpu voltage tab
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, give me a little bit. Have to call parents on skype, then I will send you screen caps from RTripps 3.4+
Then, I will check your current kernel. I love kernels
MD
Screen Caps
Sorry for the delay. Family first, especially when they live on the other side of the world.
2 jpgs, taken from system tuner.
MD
The only diff in voltage is at 1.6. You run about 25mv higher than the 3.4+ kernel.
EDIT: After Antutu, I get 7375. About 40pts above my usual. Note that I am running daily driver.
I guess, I need to flash back to my base install to get a good reading. Also, fps was +1 on what I normally get.
I will need to have about 5 days though, under 3g only, to give my approval for the 501.
These are just first impressions. But so far, no issues with the 501.
I no nothing about kernels but i do overclock my tab and under volt so comparing thor's to this what benefits do we get?
please don't drag me backwards through broken glass for using his name here im just interested in a comparison.
joe9002 said:
I no nothing about kernels but i do overclock my tab and under volt so comparing thor's to this what benefits do we get?
please don't drag me backwards through broken glass for using his name here im just interested in a comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking more like "hot coals".... broken glass is so... superficial.
Here's the deal. Unless you haven't noticed, there are only 2 kernel Dev's. RichardTripp and Thor.
Of course they both have really good kernels. And they are both some of the best Devs. Nobody can argue that (and please, this is not the place for GPL arguements, so people, don't start it)
The issue, is that they developed these kernels, for the a500, because they don't have 501's. And in the quest for the maiximum undervoltage to extend battery life, they forgot about everything else. Like internal 3g for the 501's. Yes, 501's are very sensitive to this.
Also, it seems they forgot about GPU, although that technically, is a seperate area.
So when a Dev puts out a new kernel, it deserves to be tested. Perhaps there is something extra that other devs missed.
So the answer, is yes. It's a big deal.
MD
I will sit back and wait for some feed back then hoping for a comparison im hoping to learn some thing new im getting a bit fed up with my DHD.
joe9002 said:
I no nothing about kernels but i do overclock my tab and under volt so comparing thor's to this what benefits do we get?
please don't drag me backwards through broken glass for using his name here im just interested in a comparison.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to open a can of worms but I haven't used his kernel nor have I seen his source so I can't really compare it.
Moscow Desire said:
I was thinking more like "hot coals".... broken glass is so... superficial.
Here's the deal. Unless you haven't noticed, there are only 2 kernel Dev's. RichardTripp and Thor.
Of course they both have really good kernels. And they are both some of the best Devs. Nobody can argue that (and please, this is not the place for GPL arguements, so people, don't start it)
The issue, is that they developed these kernels, for the a500, because they don't have 501's. And in the quest for the maiximum undervoltage to extend battery life, they forgot about everything else. Like internal 3g for the 501's. Yes, 501's are very sensitive to this.
Also, it seems they forgot about GPU, although that technically, is a seperate area.
So when a Dev puts out a new kernel, it deserves to be tested. Perhaps there is something extra that other devs missed.
So the answer, is yes. It's a big deal.
MD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got the gpu oc from richard trip btw. The mass storage is new to iconia though and is also featured in my recovery. Does the sn & snid report correctly on an a501 also?
drellisdee said:
Not to open a can of worms but I haven't used his kernel nor have I seen his source so I can't really compare it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's ok dude. Nobody has seen his source, except Digitex. At least for the ICS.
As with your kernel, I can say this,
With benchmarks on my stock install, it's on par with RT's 3.4+ on wifi and 3g. Base install.
However, under load with apps installed, including 3BP Shell launcher, which is a big resource pig, it is consistantly about 40-50+ points overall. Running antutu benchmark. on 3g.
So something you did, gave it just a tad bit of boost, at least when under a load. Would be nice, if you could put the "death grip" on it, and squeeze just a touch more. Probably in the GPU area.
Nice job Dres....
Hi drellisdee, thanks a lot for your work.
My A501 (but I don't use 3G) don't boot with this kernel and civato's Rom.
In fact, boot stops at the first screen, the black one with the white inscription "ACER". Any idea?
Reno_kun said:
Hi drellisdee, thanks a lot for your work.
My A501 (but I don't use 3G) don't boot with this kernel and civato's Rom.
In fact, boot stops at the first screen, the black one with the white inscription "ACER". Any idea?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you do a Dalvik wipe before installing?
---------- Post added at 12:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 AM ----------
Here's what I know about Civato's rom. The Thor 3.9r3 kernel, is tied in with some other files that enable to give native NTFS support.
It's possible that Dres's kernel, may break that connection.
And that;s what gives you the stuck at acer screen.
Just a guess.
But try wiping dalvik. then install.
Yes, before and after to be sure
Moscow Desire said:
Did you do a Dalvik wipe before installing?
---------- Post added at 12:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:27 AM ----------
Here's what I know about Civato's rom. The Thor 3.9r3 kernel, is tied in with some other files that enable to give native NTFS support.
It's possible that Dres's kernel, may break that connection.
And that;s what gives you the stuck at acer screen.
Just a guess.
But try wiping dalvik. then install.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its doubtful that a module for ntfs could break booting. You will need to check the init.rc's for changes and also init.d scripts. If you could get a shell connection and do a dmesg & logcat that would be very usefull.
With that said this kernel is built from a500 source and I cannot support a 501 as I dont have one. If it works on some 501 setups thats a bonus but wasn't intended to work.
basicly you don't need to build your own gov inside your kernel unless you want to modify the script. savie have make it for us. its save, quick, and easy for anyone. btw, the list is on repencis and savies kernel.
kurotsugi said:
basicly you don't need to build your own gov inside your kernel unless you want to modify the script. savie have make it for us. its save, quick, and easy for anyone. btw, the list is on repencis and savies kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks.. hotplug works on our phone!!??
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
thats depend on the source. some govs like sakuractive basicly only work on cpu with hotplug feature. some other govs like lulzactive won't work without proper modification. you don't know untill you tried. btw, some tips. you don't need to copy the files then edit your kconfig and makefile anytime. in kconfig, set the gov name "gov1, gov2, gov3, etc". you'll also have to rename the source to cpufreq_gov1.c, cpufreq_gov2.c etc. do the same thing in makefile. when you want to test a source code, you'll only need to replace the script inside cpufreq_gov1.c (and friends) with the scritpt from the gov you want to test. in this way, you don't need to edit kconfig and makefile anytime you want to test a gov. when you've finished, you can edit the gov description on kconfig.
So far 22gov.. Not try from ur info kuro-kun..
savie said:
So far 22gov.. Not try from ur info kuro-kun..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
22 gov but only a few useful
BTW Savie Rev 65 is so far so good:good:
@savie: only wheatley works on that github. sakuractive doesn't work. i've found some another "alien" govs but I'm just too lazy to test them. we only have 4 freq (3 really working) so no matter govs we us it won't show a significance performance differences.
Till now I have loaded 11 kernel in my kernel... I am free for testing any governor.
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
kurotsugi said:
@savie: only wheatley works on that github. sakuractive doesn't work. i've found some another "alien" govs but I'm just too lazy to test them. we only have 4 freq (3 really working) so no matter govs we us it won't show a significance performance differences.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dont know since when 468 working on 2freq 312-468 use interactive governor modified by irfan.. but i see when use that freq more than 30minuit.. at begining only show 468..
savie said:
Dont know since when 468 working on 2freq 312-468 use interactive governor modified by irfan.. but i see when use that freq more than 30minuit.. at begining only show 468..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i wish we know what is the 2/4 value so we can have 4 working freq....
our kernel partition size is limited. 11 is too much since basicly we only need three govs. 1 batt saving, 1 balanced, and 1 for performance stuff. we'd better to make use the space for different stuff like the driver or stuffs. I've found that our device is actually support v3d sync and framebuffer for better graphic quality. however, our kernel source is incomplete thus we can't use them properly (framebuffer is working but make the UI a lil bit slower-v3d sync couldn't compiled). we also have multimedia support for better video encode-decode and better sound quality. some of the wifi stuff isn't working but se still can use VLAN driver on it. the good news, all of them is working. you'll only need to add them to your kernel. the bad news, it takes more spaces. 1. it will be a burden for the ram if its too big. 2. we need more spacious room if we want to put cwm. thus, we must be wise with our kernel. for the additional govs I prefer to use modules since its is a good idea to make it easier and could give me more spaces.
kurotsugi said:
our kernel partition size is limited. 11 is too much since basicly we only need three govs. 1 batt saving, 1 balanced, and 1 for performance stuff. we'd better to make use the space for different stuff like the driver or stuffs. I've found that our device is actually support v3d sync and framebuffer for better graphic quality. however, our kernel source is incomplete thus we can't use them properly (framebuffer is working but make the UI a lil bit slower-v3d sync couldn't compiled). we also have multimedia support for better video encode-decode and better sound quality. some of the wifi stuff isn't working but se still can use VLAN driver on it. the good news, all of them is working. you'll only need to add them to your kernel. the bad news, it takes more spaces. 1. it will be a burden for the ram if its too big. 2. we need more spacious room if we want to put cwm. thus, we must be wise with our kernel. for the additional govs I prefer to use modules since its is a good idea to make it easier and could give me more spaces.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can I get modules of governor from??
Sent from my GT-S5360 using XDA
savie's thread. about gov and iosched modules
what about LionHeart?? How is it?
iPanther said:
what about LionHeart?? How is it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read this to clarify your doubts on governoers,ios and schedulers.