Database Users

[B928] SIO scheduler + SmartassV2 & OndemandX

EDIT: Use these at your own risk! These modules are built from the U8860 source, which is almost the same as the U8800pro one but not quite. In theory corruption may occur as something else may be located at a certain position in memory where the module expects something else to be there. I have yet to notice anything on my phone, but the risk is still there.
EDIT 2: My phone randomly rebooted. I haven't yet determined if these modules were the cause, but, still.
Hi,
Since the SIO IO scheduler is the one I favourite, I built the module for the B928 U8800pro firmware (tested on bronxitas' CWM variant).
1. gunzip the attached sio-iosched.ko.gz in /system/lib/modules
2. chown root.root /system/lib/modules/sio-iosched.ko && chmod 644 /system/lib/modules/sio-iosched.ko
3. Add "insmod /system/lib/modules/sio-iosched.ko" to /system/etc/install-recovery.sh
4. Reboot (or insmod now :shrug and use SetCPU or No Frills CPU to change the IO scheduler.
If you want to use SmartassV2 and/or OndemandX, insmod symsearch.ko first and then the cpufreq modules. Thanks to AnDyX, Skrilax_CZ and whirleyes.

What Is This? Give Me Brief Detail What This Thing Do?

husen4u said:
What Is This? Give Me Brief Detail What This Thing Do?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1558153

qwerty12 said:
Hi,
Since the SIO IO scheduler is the one I favourite, I built the module for the B928 U8800pro firmware (tested on bronxitas' CWM variant).
1. gunzip the attached sio-iosched.ko.gz in /system/lib/modules
2. chown root.root /system/lib/modules/sio-iosched.ko && chmod 644 /system/lib/modules/sio-iosched.ko
3. Add "insmod /system/lib/modules/sio-iosched.ko" to /system/etc/install-recovery.sh
4. Reboot (or insmod now :shrug and use SetCPU or No Frills CPU to change the IO scheduler.
If you want to use SmartassV2 and/or OndemandX, insmod symsearch.ko first and then the cpufreq modules. Thanks to AnDyX, Skrilax_CZ and whirleyes.
EDIT: These were built from the U8860 3.0.8 kernel source which isn't the same as the U8800pro kernel, but close enough. Use at your own risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you use the honor kernel??cos geno release a 3.0.8 kernel from honor source and the usb didnt work and also it corrupt my sdcard...if you have knowlage release a proper kernel working with sio and o/c inside...until then this isnt much help!! :/

pikachukaki said:
Did you use the honor kernel??cos geno release a 3.0.8 kernel from honor source and the usb didnt work and also it corrupt my sdcard...if you have knowlage release a proper kernel working with sio and o/c inside...until then this isnt much help!! :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're modules - not an entire kernel - built from the Honor source, but tricked into loading on our original Huawei U8800pro 3.0.8 kernel...
It is possible that something can go wrong because this isn't built from the original source (you're not meant to do this - kernel structures in memory may be located somewhere else etc.), but I haven't noticed any corruption on the internal eMMC so far on my U8800pro with OndemandX governor and SIO I/O scheduler [and logcat kernel module built from this source] & USB is working fine

qwerty12 said:
They're modules - not an entire kernel - built from the Honor source, but tricked into loading on our original Huawei U8800pro 3.0.8 kernel...
It is possible that something can go wrong because this isn't built from the original source (you're not meant to do this - kernel structures in memory may be located somewhere else etc.), but I haven't noticed any corruption on the internal eMMC so far on my U8800pro with OndemandX governor and SIO I/O scheduler [and logcat kernel module built from this source] & USB is working fine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so you compile the honor source...add the modules and had a working kernel??so its easier to release the boot.img and if you can add o/c but its funny that geno compile honor source and it didnt work properly!!!

pikachukaki said:
so you compile the honor source...add the modules and had a working kernel??so its easier to release the boot.img and if you can add o/c but its funny that geno compile honor source and it didnt work properly!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, no! Genokolar actually did some proper work to try and get the Honor source working for the U8800pro but too much is missing (drivers that the U8800pro needs)
My approach was to take the Honor source and bastardize it into getting these modules built (files that let you introduce code into a running kernel after it's been built) and trick them into loading on the original kernel
This is a dangerous trick (there's a reason why the kernel checks to see if the version stored in the module matches your running kernel) because you're not meant to do this (corruption can occur) but so far everything has been working OK for me and I'd rather be using the phone with the modules as it feels a bit smoother. It is possible to add OC support through modules without having to replace the kernel (http://hex.ro/wp/blog/overclocking-an-android-phone-running-with-an-msm-core/) but it's harder to do and more dangerous to do with the Honor sources because it's not the original kernel source. Actually I should edit the first post...

qwerty12 said:
No, no! Genokolar actually did some proper work to try and get the Honor source working for the U8800pro but too much is missing (drivers that the U8800pro needs)
My approach was to take the Honor source and bastardize it into getting these modules built (files that let you introduce code into a running kernel after it's been built) and trick them into loading on the original kernel
This is a dangerous trick (there's a reason why the kernel checks to see if the version stored in the module matches your running kernel) because you're not meant to do this (corruption can occur) but so far everything has been working OK for me and I'd rather be using the phone with the modules as it feels a bit smoother. It is possible to add OC support through modules without having to replace the kernel (http://hex.ro/wp/blog/overclocking-an-android-phone-running-with-an-msm-core/) but it's harder to do and more dangerous to do with the Honor sources because it's not the original kernel source. Actually I should edit the first post...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see that you have the knowlage...and also you can let us try if you want the kernel...but if you manage to o/c it this will be wonderful..and also there is a english word bastardize??? i willing to give your kernel a try although!!

pikachukaki said:
I see that you have the knowlage...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish I know only the basics - people like dzo and genokolar know what they're doing
and also you can let us try if you want the kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Honor kernel is useless - I don't think it would even boot... I just take the modules
...but if you manage to o/c it this will be wonderful..and also there is a english word bastardize???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would like to OC, I admit, but it's very risky to attempt when the person (me) is lacking a lot of knowledge about kernels, CPU clocks and assembly, and when the kernel source isn't the original - I'd have to attempt to guess things from the 2.6 source
And, yes, bastardize is a real word, meaning to corrupt, make illegitimate and reduce the quality of something. It's an apt word for the stuff in the first post!

qwerty12 said:
I wish I know only the basics - people like dzo and genokolar know what they're doing
The Honor kernel is useless - I don't think it would even boot... I just take the modules
I would like to OC, I admit, but it's very risky to attempt when the person (me) is lacking a lot of knowledge about kernels, CPU clocks and assembly, and when the kernel source isn't the original - I'd have to attempt to guess things from the 2.6 source
And, yes, bastardize is a real word, meaning to corrupt, make illegitimate and reduce the quality of something. It's an apt word for the stuff in the first post!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm at least you have some knowlage.. so you didnt edit the boot.img you edit sideways! hmm if you manage to play with this a bit it will be great....we also have the word basardise and i never heard of it until now...by bastardise (Bastarde) its a curse a "bad" word...we mean someone that isnt his parents child!

Honor boot.img works on our phone almost perfectly, phone boots but some diferent hardware (wifi, camera, bluetooth) doesn't work (ril OK). Cpu has clocked to 1,4GHz and works very stable. We find it moth ago, but with other hardware didn't work we dropped this work. Maybe you could find something usefull from that.
Sent from my ragelis

great job qwerty12!
Trust me what you've done needs more than just basic knowledge
I'll also tell that honor kernel boots up correctly on u8800pro(in my occasion touchscreen just didn't work, so I could only see a beautiful lockscreen there xD).
I think you should try also adding OC. Although I kinda understand you don't want to risk damaging your phone, but I'm pretty much sure that you'll manage to add OC correctly.
Anyways, keep it up!
Again great job and thanks!

Crazy talk...but we can't took rils from GB kernel...or even desire hd or some other similar phone and make our way??and geno again didnt release his honor/u8800+ source kernel code so someone can fix the sd bugs!!
also..good news everyone...(profesor furnworth) i found cm9 device tree for u8800+ dont know if its working properly but someone with linux can give it a try
https://github.com/ivan19871002/cm9_device_u8800pro
https://github.com/ivan19871002/cm9_vendor_u8800pro (Im not quite sure what this is but maybe its needed!)

@pika
great news about cm9. I hope someone is gonna give it a shot and build it. Better post it on anzhi too.The more people see it, the better.
@qwerty12
I had an idea for OC in u8800 pro. The good thing about this one, is that I think is more safe to try out.
I think you can use dzo kernel source!
boot.img from latest dzo aurora works just fine on our phone(only bt + wifi don't work at all - camera works partially)
OC on dzo kernel also works correctly on u8800pro(personally tried this).
I think with your knowledge, you can just grab dzo kernel source and build the appropriate modules.
Please give it a try if you want to.
Again thanks for your great work.

the guy is chinese and he is known in anzhi i dont know why they arent compiling it... i try last night until 8 in the morning with no success! :/

Moihack said:
I had an idea for OC in u8800 pro. The good thing about this one, is that I think is more safe to try out.
I think you can use dzo kernel source!
boot.img from latest dzo aurora works just fine on our phone(only bt + wifi don't work at all - camera works partially)
OC on dzo kernel also works correctly on u8800pro(personally tried this).
I think with your knowledge, you can just grab dzo kernel source and build the appropriate modules.
Please give it a try if you want to.
Again thanks for your great work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is, (I/O) schedulers can be built as modules - load them, and you're adding new functionality. However, the difference with OC support: CPU regulation (probably the wrong term) is built into the kernel - it has to be. With dzo's kernel, overclocking works because the "CPU regulation" code has been directly modified to allow the user to support higher frequencies. With a module designed to enable overclocking for phones where you can, you don't add new functionality like with the schedulers - you're patching the kernel code in memory that controls the CPU.
I will look into it (people infinitely more clever than me have done it for other phones and produced code and, believe it or not, I do actually want to OC my U8800pro and I don't mind the risk personally), but it's unlikely I'll be able to come up with anything since:
I am not a proper programmer (this is probably reason enough to stay away )
Loading modules designed for another kernel is already risky enough, but even more so since I'm dealing with a kernel designed for another model so,
I'd have to look at the 2.6 kernel source to see what the frequencies etc. assigned to the U8800pro are and hope that Huawei didn't change anything for the 3.0 kernel

There is a ics boot.img with OC to 1.8GHz already, but needs to fix sd card mounting bug, on some phones sd card mounts normaly, on other ones didn't mount my phone no maunting sd
Sent from my ragelis

bronxitas said:
There is a ics boot.img with OC to 1.8GHz already, but needs to fix sd card mounting bug, on some phones sd card mounts normaly, on other ones didn't mount my phone no maunting sd
Sent from my ragelis
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And at mine scruew my sdcard (( it needed format after installing geno kernel
Sent from my U8800Pro using xda premium

Tomorow giris said that look at oc boot.img and will try to fix sd card mounting problem. The new OC boot.img is not geno's work we are in one step further than geno
Tommorow giris will upload to chinese developers my and kamatozko work and... i think that europeans are leaving china customers/developers behind in this situation
I can't upload here kamatozko OC boot.img because it is not finished yet and I even didn't asked his permissions to do that.
Sent from my ragelis

bronxitas said:
Tomorow giris said that look at oc boot.img and will try to fix sd card mounting problem. The new OC boot.img is not geno's work we are in one step further than geno
Tommorow giris will upload to chinese developers my and kamatozko work and... i think that europeans are leaving china customers/developers behind in this situation
I can't upload here kamatozko OC boot.img because it is not finished yet and I even didn't asked his permissions to do that.
Sent from my ragelis
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
chinese cant make nothing except for geno and geno took all the chinese he can get and make miui for them he just can't or won't work with our phone..anyway thats good news let hope more devs pop out!!for once in my life i want cm based rom!

[Kernel] 308 Kernel for ICS

Here is something I have been working on and thought I would share.
It is a 3.08 kernel based on DZOs source and modified with some governer settings the way I like them, a bit of tuning of the voltages and cpu freqs, and a lot of cherry picks from different sources.
Sources:
Mine:
https://github.com/PaulMilbank/kernel_huawei.git
Build off the master branch with the u8800_defconfig if you want to compile yourself.
Where I borrowed from:
https://github.com/Blefish/android_kernel_huawei_u8800: Quite a few cherry picks from the ICS_Chocolate source.
https://github.com/virtuous/htc7x30-3.0.git: Mostly KGSL fixes from here.
https://github.com/ezeteze/u8800-kernel: Gave me an idea about how much to undervolt by.
https://github.com/dzo/kernel_huawei: Pulled some old fixes from the .35 ICS source
https://github.com/TomGiordano/kernel_huawei: Pulled some changes from the .35 ICS Source
Mostly these have been cherry picks that I integrated into my kernel and some tuning by me.
Also thanks to fjsferreira for his guide on compiling DZO source: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1577876
Everything that worked on DZOs kernel should work here and it should also fix a few annoying bugs.
Notes:
First Kernel:
The battery life is largely improved. I easily get 24 hours use and could probably get up to 2 days if I turned wifi off and turned mobile data off when I was not using it.
I have not seen the random text corruption on this kernel. I did see it a few times on the original aurora kernel.
It seems at least as smooth as the original Aurora kernel, maybe a bit smoother.
It should leak slightly less memory and handle kernel events better.
It is not magic though, you may still have the odd reboot and not everything is perfect. It should be at least as good as the original and hopefully a lot better.
Not so much distortion over back speaker.
Added SIO cpu scheduler.
07/10/2012 update kernel#22:
Swap and Zram enabled, need to test.
1.8ghz is back
368mhz minimum clock.
13/10/2012 update kernel #54
Some CAF and Huawei pro wifi code for testing.
Changed readahead (may need to wipe cache, dalvic cache for this, seems to cause some apps to force close without those wipes.)
Couple more KGSL tweaks
Couple of Bluetooth tweaks.
14/10/2012 update kernel #55
Revert most wifi changes, I am still getting wifi sticking on, will likely have another revert here too.
Reduce readahead some more, please wipe cache, dalvic cache and fix permissions when flashing after this change.
fix a line of code I forgot to add
Revert a franco change.
Boost lowmwmory killer values to hold a bit more ram free and kill appps/background processes a little earlier.
SuperStock Kernel
Test kernel for those with issues. Just latest DZO config, latest DZO source fresh from his github, no CAF or Franco changes
Undervolt from 308 Kernel
368mhz minimum, might need to set this to 245 to match DZO kernel
lowmemorykiller updated
swap and zram enabled.
Hopefully this should show where issues are occurring in my other kernel.
If you get a reboot, do the following from a terminal or over adb:
Code:
su
cat /dev/block/mmcblk0p7 > /sdcard/crash.txt
Then post the crash file (if it has anything in it) here.
Get it Here:
07/10/2012 Kernel #22: http://www.mediafire.com/?o5niwi1jb73j2jn
13/10/2012 update #54: http://www.mediafire.com/?ih5iy936irt326i
14/10/2012 update #55: http://www.mediafire.com/?u29faeh4v1l0sfw
SuperStock Kernel: http://www.mediafire.com/?67o0y9kc2956fy1
Works in Aurora and Miui, I tried it in AOKP, but it did not boot so something went wrong there, not sure what yet.
Will update here and on GitHub too as I make more changes.
Cheers
Paul

PaulMilbank said:
Here is something I have been working on and thought I would share.
It is a 3.08 kernel based on DZOs source and modified with some governer settings the way I like them, a bit of tuning of the voltages and cpu freqs, and a lot of cherry picks from different sources.
Sources:
Mine:
https://github.com/PaulMilbank/kernel_huawei.git
Build off the master branch with the u8800_defconfig if you want to compile yourself.
Where I copied from:
https://github.com/Blefish/android_kernel_huawei_u8800: Quite a few cherry picks from the ICS_Chocolate source
https://github.com/virtuous/htc7x30-3.0.git
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please can u explain the changes in more detail? and where is download link?

Sorry, posted instead of hitting the preview button. Everything up now.

Is it possible to provide only the Kernel update?

Can we undervolt even more?
Actually just noticed... since u modified only the kernel, why you post the whole ROM?
Sent from my U8800

firstly, thank you so much!
I just want to request a tuning in camera, cause camera on aurora 4.1a is a little bit slow (it's delay like 0.3s and blurry as hell:crying

AceDroidX said:
Can we undervolt even more?
Actually just noticed... since u modified only the kernel, why you post the whole ROM?
Sent from my U8800
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea, why is that?
EDIT
Ive just saw this
I will sort out an anykernel updater soon, but until then I have put it into Aurora 4.1 with all the updates applied and Geno's Miui 2.9.14.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Thanks to you, the screen tearing problem that I had on DZO's 4.1 ICS is gone.
Thank you!

Sorry guys, as it says, will sort out a kernel updater soon, just need a little time. I just already had the roms I had been testing with.
Sent from my U8800 using xda premium

Unicorn9x said:
firstly, thank you so much!
I just want to request a tuning in camera, cause camera on aurora 4.1a is a little bit slow (it's delay like 0.3s and blurry as hell:crying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this just on my kernel or the original Aurora too? have you tried tap to focus or holding the button down until the square goes green to show it is focussed? Should not be blurry if it is focussed correctly.

Anykernel updater posted.

can you try to compile JB source from code Aurora with this kernel. it might get quite stable now.

Thanks Paul your kernel + init.d tweaks = super silky smooth ui great work mate

Glad it is helping people. What init.d tweaks did you use?
Also I won't be compiling roms from source. I don't have the hardware to do it. Kernels are about my limit.

I get random touches in the right edge of the screen with this kernel. Synaptics digitizer.

PaulMilbank said:
Glad it is helping people. What init.d tweaks did you use?
Also I won't be compiling roms from source. I don't have the hardware to do it. Kernels are about my limit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used zephyr1988's one, I only just realized he updated it to work with the latest version of aurora
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=27398688&postcount=1

faekplastik3s said:
I get random touches in the right edge of the screen with this kernel. Synaptics digitizer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure about this, have not changed anything with the synaptics driver. If it worked in DZOs kernel, it should work here.

so if u want to use on aurore i only need to download the file on the first page and your kernel is already there?

Can I use this kernel on Elora ROM?

I was waiting for any kernel!!
Already testing and tearing screen problem gone, WiFi is super fast! You have done really great job!
Huawei u8800 - Tapatalked

[Q] Repencis kernel broken?!?

Hello Mr. Repencis, and congratulations for your work.
I used Repencis V3 pro rom for more than a year, and i was always satisfied. I chose it because it was the one that took up less ram than any other I've tried and also because it had amazing graphics and cool features (eg a2sd support).
I recently installed version 3.5 found on another website, because here all the links are broken and I was surprised by the amazing graphics and low memory usage.
The new kernel also supports scaling of the CPU, but is not really complete regarding available frequencies and governor.
So i'd like to install kernel 7 final or at least 6.3 because most complete functions and scaling governor available, but absolutely does not want to work.
I tried to install it on your rom and also in other roms (jellyblast and hyperion) but i had no success (bootloop or locked at samsung screen).
However I successfully tested kernel USSR (also supports a2sd) and also Savie kernel (fabulous for the cpu, but no a2sd support). Both works in repencis 3.5 rom and on Hyperion 8.
Now.. Can you give me a hand on how to install your kernel and, above all, can you give me a link that is safe? Your kernel has the perfect features that I want, but it seems i was completely unable to make it working.
I also tried the version 6.3 of the kernel without success.
I came to see the boot image and then reboot loop.
Thanks and goodbye.

Yes it is
Want To Ask Question? Ask Here
Thanks,
TechnoSavie

Repencis hasn't been round here since about half way through last year
Try hells fusion #50 - its the latest stable kernel around here

Thank you
This day i have installed merruk kernel, but it seems i have some problems because my phone shutdown.
Now i want to correct max frequancies but supersu doesn't work anymore. It seems a well known problem with merruk kernel.
I installed superuser and removed supersu and it seems ok!
I was interested in repencis kernel because i like to use as2d and i have only found Repencis and ussr kernel support a2sd.
But then i understood that a2sd have a problem preventing deep sleep mode. So maybe i need to convinc myself to use link2sd.
P.S. What do you think about savie kernel? Don't you think is better than hells?
PPS where can i find latest hells kernel?
Really really thanks and goodbye!

sercik said:
This day i have installed merruk kernel, but it seems i have some problems because my phone shutdown.
Now i want to correct max frequancies but supersu doesn't work anymore. It seems a well known problem with merruk kernel.
I installed superuser and removed supersu and it seems ok!
I was interested in repencis kernel because i like to use as2d and i have only found Repencis and ussr kernel support a2sd.
But then i understood that a2sd have a problem preventing deep sleep mode. So maybe i need to convinc myself to use link2sd.
P.S. What do you think about savie kernel? Don't you think is better than hells?
PPS where can i find latest hells kernel?
Really really thanks and goodbye!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both Davies and hells are quite complete and stable. Hells kernel can be found in the galaxy y's android development section. A search wouldn't harm I guess

serious problem with camera

hi
i've this problem with some kernels.. suddenly some graphical glitches appear in camera and also output picture
i thought it's because of undervolt.. but even overvolting didn't help.. what's the problem?

Like you said I think it's just certain kernel incompatibilities. I had the same problem with Google Maps on AOKP M2 with Ziddeys kernel.

but there are many kernels with problem to me.. and when i asked in their thread, no one had this issue..

Plz help

Dark Fear said:
Plz help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anyone?

Dark Fear said:
anyone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, I give it a try. To start it would be good to know what your current setup is. Please post Android version, recovery, rom and kernel.
And in addition are u using an app to tweak the kernel u're using?

tnx dude
this problem exist in most 4.3 rom/kernels.. it's there in all undevolted kernels.. but overvolting won't fix this..
it's weird,, my cpu type is fast.. it should be bear much undervolting..
i've edited twrp recovery.. and using FauxClock

Dark Fear said:
tnx dude
this problem exist in most 4.3 rom/kernels.. it's there in all undevolted kernels.. but overvolting won't fix this..
it's weird,, my cpu type is fast.. it should be bear much undervolting..
i've edited twrp recovery.. and using FauxClock
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not that easy to say beeing on fast bin chip should allow much undervolting. Obviously you gone to far and getting glitches on camera.
First thing I'd do is clear data and uninstal fauxclock and reflash my current rom (wipe cache and dalvik). Now back on stock kernel (most likely since most roms using stock one) with stock ramdisk etc. I'd try camera and see if it is working without glitches. Then choose the kernel to go and I'd use the related tweaking app (Faux kernel = faux clock, semaphore = semaphore manager and so on) and undervolting step by step checking if camera works in between.
Check your kernel thread you might some posts of how much people undervolted.
A little bit informaion about undervolting can be found here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40243825&postcount=2

OhDae-su said:
not that easy to say beeing on fast bin chip should allow much undervolting. Obviously you gone to far and getting glitches on camera.
First thing I'd do is clear data and uninstal fauxclock and reflash my current rom (wipe cache and dalvik). Now back on stock kernel (most likely since most roms using stock one) with stock ramdisk etc. I'd try camera and see if it is working without glitches. Then choose the kernel to go and I'd use the related tweaking app (Faux kernel = faux clock, semaphore = semaphore manager and so on) and undervolting step by step checking if camera works in between.
Check your kernel thread you might some posts of how much people undervolted.
A little bit informaion about undervolting can be found here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=40243825&postcount=2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tnx very much..
if it's because of undervolting, why the problem exists even if i overvolt if?

Dark Fear said:
tnx very much..
if it's because of undervolting, why the problem exists even if i overvolt if?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By overvolting you mean going over the default voltages? I think this could be indeed result in the same issue as undervolting to much. But just a wild guess and I don't know why to overvolt at all.
Applying the default kernel voltages should solve your issue...does it?

OhDae-su said:
By overvolting you mean going over the default voltages? I think this could be indeed result in the same issue as undervolting to much. But just a wild guess and I don't know why to overvolt at all.
Applying the default kernel voltages should solve your issue...does it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no..!
that's the problem!!!!
even if i overvolt it (default google values) my problem doesn't solve
anyway.. thank you.. i'll give your solution a try :fingers-crossed:

{help}purekat rom

hello everyone
i want to know that can i use hells fusion #50 kernel with purekat rom
or i need to use percy and blackheart only
i am gonna flash this rom as soon as i get to know this................

kernel
abhishekr700 said:
hello everyone
i want to know that can i use hells fusion #50 kernel with purekat rom
or i need to use percy and blackheart only
i am gonna flash this rom as soon as i get to know this................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
purekat is build on base as AOSP..... so u will need to flash percy or black reactor since hell's fusion supports stock base roms:laugh:

abhishekr700 said:
hello everyone
i want to know that can i use hells fusion #50 kernel with purekat rom
or i need to use percy and blackheart only
i am gonna flash this rom as soon as i get to know this................
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not sure about purekat. I tried hells fusion on reincarnation (cm7). .device boots... but wifi & bluetooth won't work ... guess it's same for purekat

hells fusion #50 can boot cm7/aosp but it does not have the correct moduals for wifi/bluetooth for use on cm7/aosp therefore if you want a fully operational phone you need to use a kernel built for cm7/aosp like percys or black reactor

better to use cm kernel !!

Boot loop
NOPE ..... You can try Percy kernal but Hells fusion will Cause Boot loop

Sanjuujosephh said:
NOPE ..... You can try Percy kernal but Hells fusion will Cause Boot loop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hells fusion will not cause a boot loop - hells fusion can boot cm and aosp based roms but does not contain the moduals needed for wifi and bluetooth to work (it contains moduals for use on stock based only) hense why you need a cm/aosp kernel for full phone functions

I prefer u use BlackReactor . i have use it once .
[iPhone 6] or [Samsung Galaxy S5]
>>SG Y - Hyperion 8 Rom<<
>>SG S3 mini - Official Stock Rom<<

I think wifi and bluetooth dont work because oF drivers
Anyway tell me the correct procedure for flashing blackreactor kernel along with links
And yes if I just want to feel the rom not using wifi and bluetooth then can I flash rom on hells kernel

abhishekr700 said:
I think wifi and bluetooth dont work because oF drivers
Anyway tell me the correct procedure for flashing blackreactor kernel along with links
And yes if I just want to feel the rom not using wifi and bluetooth then can I flash rom on hells kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
like iv explained many times in this thread you cannot use hells fusion as it does not contain the wifi and bluetooth modual for use on cm7/aosp - that kernel is for stock roms only
hells fusion will boot it but you may find things start force closing on you and not work properly with not all phone functions working
you MUST use percys kernel or black reactor kernel if you are using cm7/aosp to get full phone functions - network wifi bluetooth etc
all kernels are in the dev section - a simple search and you will find it - in fact black reactor kernel is currently on page one of the dev thread so not really much searching required
and you just flash it in cwm with system mounted then reboot to recovery and format system data cache then mount system data cache then flash your rom zip

Go for Black Heart

marcussmith2626 said:
like iv explained many times in this thread you cannot use hells fusion as it does not contain the wifi and bluetooth modual for use on cm7/aosp - that kernel is for stock roms only
hells fusion will boot it but you may find things start force closing on you and not work properly with not all phone functions working
you MUST use percys kernel or black reactor kernel if you are using cm7/aosp to get full phone functions - network wifi bluetooth etc
all kernels are in the dev section - a simple search and you will find it - in fact black reactor kernel is currently on page one of the dev thread so not really much searching required
and you just flash it in cwm with system mounted then reboot to recovery and format system data cache then mount system data cache then flash your rom zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flashed blackreactor kernel through odin and phone does not boot past kernel logo even after 20 min
gonna try through cwm recovery....will update soon
and one more thing is v5 of blackreactor kerneel stable??

abhishekr700 said:
flashed blackreactor kernel through odin and phone does not boot past kernel logo even after 20 min
gonna try through cwm recovery....will update soon
and one more thing is v5 of blackreactor kerneel stable??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why are you using v5 of the kernel for cm/aosp rom?
please read the thread fully!!
v5 is for stock rom (doesnt work on all basebands so use v4)
cm is for cm roms and aosp
if you are using cm7 or an aosp rom you MUST use a cm kernel!!!

marcussmith2626 said:
why are you using v5 of the kernel for cm/aosp rom?
please read the thread fully!!
v5 is for stock rom (doesnt work on all basebands so use v4)
cm is for cm roms and aosp
if you are using cm7 or an aosp rom you MUST use a cm kernel!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so i can only use cm kernel not even v4 ?

abhishekr700 said:
so i can only use cm kernel not even v4 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will say it one last time
if you are using cm7/aosp you MUST use a kernel built for cm7/aosp
that means you cannot use a kernel built for stock (they use different mount systems hense non booting)
To make it clearer - no you cannot use v5 or v4 of black reactor kernel on cm/aosp as they are stock kernels
You MUST use the cm version of black reactor!

marcussmith2626 said:
I will say it one last time
if you are using cm7/aosp you MUST use a kernel built for cm7/aosp
that means you cannot use a kernel built for stock (they use different mount systems hense non booting)
To make it clearer - no you cannot use v5 or v4 of black reactor kernel on cm/aosp as they are stock kernels
You MUST use the cm version of black reactor!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lull, thats frustrating enough...
however,
Read the op carefully guys,
ops are written very carefully.
so,
CM version == ONLY AND ONLY CM/AOSP roms.
v5 and v4 == Only for stock based roms... (However, they can booth both aosp and cm7, but ur wifi or bluetooth wont work,) pick ur poison

AH..FINALLY
Ok
i got my answer
mods please close this thread