Let's get this party started! Post your Nexus 7 benchmarks and please state what Android and ROM version are you on.
Of course the good news is that the new Nexus 7, although listed as Qualcomm S4 Pro (APQ8064-1AA), it is actually more like an underclocked Snapdragon 600 according to AnandTech, as it sports 4 Krait 300 CPU cores and 2 gigs of LPDDR3L RAM, so it's gonna be fast yet clocked at 1.5GHz more battery friendly.
AndroidCommunity benchmarks:
http://androidcommunity.com/nexus-7-2013-review-20130728/
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Ubergizmo benchmarks
http://www.ubergizmo.com/2013/07/nexus-7-2-review/
Screen benchmarks from Anandtech:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/7176/nexus-7-2013-mini-review/2
Could someone run the nbench benchmark and post the results, here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1270596 preferably.
Nbench market link: http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench
Thanks.
Let's see some numbers folks!
Ars Technica benchmarks
http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013...-meet-the-new-standard-for-android-tablets/2/
And just a quick close-up on text sharpness, iPad Mini, Nexus 7 2012, Nexus 7 2013
FWIW, http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html
Nate2 said:
FWIW, http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That chart is crazy. I was getting a headache even trying to find the nex 7.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Richieboy67 said:
That chart is crazy. I was getting a headache even trying to find the nex 7.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the "Find on page" function of your browser for the word "Nexus".
Sent from my unrooted DroidX using Tapatalk 2
Nate2 said:
FWIW, http://www.androidbenchmark.net/cpumark_chart.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well the new Nexus isn't listed on that page. Though as a reference I scored 11,969 for my CPU with that app.
Nate2 said:
Could someone run the nbench benchmark and post the results, here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1270596 preferably.
Nbench market link: http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.drolez.nbench
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bump.
I'd really like to see if the 2013 Nexus 7 can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Thanks.
Nate2 said:
Bump.
I'd really like to see if the 2013 Nexus 7 can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is from mind using Jassy5 kernel @ 1782mhz stock rom.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium HD app
Nate2 said:
Bump.
I'd really like to see if the 2013 Nexus 7 can outperform the Samsung Galaxy S4, using nbench.
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here ya go... Faux kernel clocked at 1.7ghz.... stock rom
Edit: I probably should have ran it with "performance" governor...
I'm really interested in 1.7GHz clock benchmarks, stability tests and battery info.
Share some, lads!
Related
My score in linpack are now around 35 sin e I updated....that's a drop of 10 to 15 points from before the update. Anyone else notice a drop in linpack?
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Do you have flash installed?
Also, what app do you use to check the linpack? [edit] nevermind. I found it.
33.614.
3.0.1 with flash installed.
36.14 when I uninstalled flash.
I know it's the same range, but it's strange how everything seems faster without flash installed. I've uninstalled and reinstalled it twice today to see if it made a difference, and I think I'm going to leave it uninstalled until next week.
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
First thing I did was unistall flash and then reboot....no good. Then I unintalled most of my apps, reboot, retest, same results. Using linpack app from market.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Does your Linpack score somehow have something to do with how your Xoom performs, real world?
muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...
ilogik said:
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but that cannot be the only thing at work here. I mean the iPad2 is scoring 5x better than the Xoom in linpack. I highly doubt that the hardware is 5x better than the Xoom, especially when the iPad2's CPU is only clocked at 900mhz.
muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wth... just, wth.
That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Usmc7356 said:
That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anandtech. I would trust their numbers over any other site I can think of. They are legit. You can go check out the numbers in their preview of the iPad2.
Link to preview of iPad2:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2
link to relevant section:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2/2
I thought a benchmark Thread could be interesting, especially in the future when more roms will be available.
here's my actual with Stock rom @ Geekbench
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Wow! This kicks the iPhone 5 which has a score of 1601! My friend was boasting about it's benchmark score! :victory:
You should post your geekbench score. It does not seem to be updated here: http://browser.primatelabs.com/android-benchmarks
iPhone 5 .. is that something to eat?
Nice!!:good::good:
Whit antutu ?
Inviato dal mio GT-I9000 con Tapatalk 2
Less than a day old. Stock.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda app-developers app
ShaKki said:
iPhone 5 .. is that something to eat?
Lol If it is, I doubt it would taste good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xenoism said:
ShaKki said:
iPhone 5 .. is that something to eat?
Lol If it is, I doubt it would taste good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It taste like failure
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Avatar said:
Xenoism said:
It taste like failure
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Spoiled apples :screwy::screwy:
-TeaM VeNuM Like A Boss
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best score I've seen yet
hanbaoquan15 said:
Best score I've seen yet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow did u overclock or something?? Im getting a score of 6015 +/- on the LJ1 update today
daraj said:
Wow did u overclock or something?? Im getting a score of 6015 +/- on the LJ1 update today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No overclock at all, Just ran it after I turned it on. It was on the XXALIE firmware.
here is my first test ever with my new Note II, all is factory stock:
Here is a second test showing that the first one was no coincidence:
hagba said:
Here is a second test showing that the first one was no coincidence:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very nice! this means the score will be even more impressive once overclocking kernel is out.
The Note II is the best smart phone ever!
Well very nice...
On the other hand my one is pathetic (similar to SGS3). I wonder is it a version of it or is it a firmware.
The CPU benchmark shows 5231 points other sections are similar to your tests guys. Any clue why?
Build XXALJ1
Regards,
R
Just amazing
Battery life is fantastic to my s3 would have been lower by now ...
Must admit im so impressed well worth the money
Well dobe sammy
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Look at this.. this before 2 test, from 6100 and 6600... two haves very similar points in all categories but not in I/O (7000 vs 10000)
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
My Quadrant says 6047 points.
I open a thread to compare our benchmark and so find the best adjustment for the razr i.
I do my bench with Quadrant Advanced and AnTuTu Benchmark.
Don't forget to post your phone spec.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
View attachment 1516904
Rom: 81.5.39001 Retail en GB
Build: 8.7.1.l.110_IFW-39
Envoyé depuis mon XT890
nice quadrant score... but unreal...
download the latest version for accurate results..
Check AnTuTu v3!
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
My Razr I AnTuTu
Similar results
Here's my score
Here's mine...
i m wrong, or this benchmarks are better than gs3 ecc?
Antutu v3 is using new methods for benchmarking... you shouldn't compare different versions between different phones...
Most certainly Galaxy S III and more powerfull phones will score higher now...
The Note 2 is a lot higher but Tegra 3 devices are now slower than the Razr i! That's the Transformer Prime and Nexus 7.
Guys, can you please post results from Nenamark 2?
Thanks!
Marcb said:
Guys, can you please post results from Nenamark 2?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure...
Here is my antutu score
all the best
Moley
sent from my screen to your screen using a Motorola RAZR I
Stock OS 4.0.4
16GB class 10 sd card
Phill_UK said:
Sure...
View attachment 1519499
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks...
39 fps seems to be a good score for a PowerVR 540.
Mine, latest gb update
Sent from my XT890 using xda premium
Here mine
Ics retail Brazil
Enviado desde el Razr con Intel
I ran a couple of tests and also found that GLBenchmark isn't fully compatible with our phones and crashes at some point.
In screenshot order: Quadrant Standard, AnTuTu, NenaMark2 and Vellamo (x2)
Mine is running 871.110.12008.XT890.Oi.en.BR
In the vellamo benchnark you are under the razr i test!! WT*?!
Sent from my XT890 using xda premium
PELLET Nolwenn said:
In the vellamo benchnark you are under the razr i test!! WT*?!
Sent from my XT890 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The difference is minimum, but yes still there.
Also if you check each parameter on AnTuTu and Quadrant each device is running differently.
Here's mine
Sent from my XT890 using xda app-developers app
Stock Kernel and Rom it looks, like the S4Pro is not far behind the 600? Just a little GPU enhancement - overclock and it would easily match the 22350 by the HTC One and not far behind Galaxy S4 either.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Nice score mate
Sent from my X909 using Tapatalk 2
my untutu score
Sent from my X909 using Tapatalk 2[/QUOTE]
mcf1 said:
View attachment 1835033
my untutu score
Sent from my X909 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[/QUOTE]
1st post on XDA and highest bench thus far.. well played sir
That inst mine I just saw it while I was looking at buying the phone awhile ago, I saw them as high as 22500 I think on AndroiAuthority or on a similar website. I get my Find 5 today and whatever, I'm going to push it to the limits every once in awhile, gaming benching etc. I want to do the same as I have my DNA. Mu CPU up to 1892 at 4 cores and 100 or 125 overclock GPU. I'm getting HTC One and close to the S4 Octa scores with it overclocked. These s4Pro's will go and they overclock well. On the CPU side I really don't see any reason to get much higher, I think most quad core phones now will run pretty much all the Apps that are out, But I would like to get the GPU up to where the Snapdragon 600 is running, I think the S4Pro is at 300 MHz and the 600 is clocked at 400MHz. So it shouldn't be to hard, they did it on the DNA pretty quick. Cant wait until DHL gets here, watch it will be like 6 0r 7pm. Oh well. I will just get all my Apps ready.
So do you guys have any tips before I start playing around with my OF5?
Please! No dead pixels or hardware faults
I'm getting just under 21k (20997) on stock ROM. I've seen Oppo Find 5's with 27k, so with the right tweaks this thing is a beast and just under the S4.
I got 22k with firefly and i think this is just awesome
Sent from my X909 using xda app-developers app
19633 with pac rom
Sent from my X909 using xda app-developers app
Never got over 20050 in Antutu, no matter what ROM I tried, midnight 32GB version.
My max antutu on stock (non-clean phone): 20702
Sent from my X909 using xda premium
try cm10
KaminoReal said:
Never got over 20050 in Antutu, no matter what ROM I tried, midnight 32GB version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try a cm10 or based cm10 rom.
So is it really the 20% cheating scandal? I don't think the difference in ram would be 5k but maybe I am wrong.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
TechSilver13 said:
So is it really the 20% cheating scandal? I don't think the difference in ram would be 5k but maybe I am wrong.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't rely on only one Benchmark Score.Try comparing in other apps also.
Btw does this benchmark tests really matter ?.
Many people just overclock their devices & ram and try to increase their scores and after test they again come back to normal one.
Hit Thanx If I helped U - Its frEE
Bootanimations-MDPI
Post Your DevicE History HerE.
Samsung did something to the note 3 to make sure it runs a 100% during benchmarks
http://gadgets.ndtv.com/mobiles/new...alaxy-note-3-to-boost-benchmark-scores-427161
Sent from my LG-D801 using xda app-developers app
TechSilver13 said:
So is it really the 20% cheating scandal? I don't think the difference in ram would be 5k but maybe I am wrong.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No brah. G2 will never have the lag of Crapwiz. Rest assured that Antutu doesn't mean anything.
Bro, Antutu is useless nowadays...so many fake device leakers and Samsung results that the test means literally nothing. And yes, the 20% cheating scandal probably had something to do with it.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
TechSilver13 said:
So is it really the 20% cheating scandal? I don't think the difference in ram would be 5k but maybe I am wrong.
Sent from my LG-D800 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have got 35k score before. But they vary.
What I'm curious about is if the extra gig of ram on the note if it will eat up more battery. Cuz this battery is just insane
2 benchmark in a row always get 36k
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app
Lol this is a funny thread. It is already known that Samsung is cheating the system with the Note 3 for benchmarks because the un-optimized joke of Touchlag wouldn't score in the range of other optimized Jelly Bean devices if they didn't cheat it.
Use the Touchlag UI on the Note 3 and compare it to the G2 and then tell me which one is faster in the real world.
Samsung has turned into Apple.... A joke.
Sent from my LG-D800 using xda premium
Evilmonstertruck said:
View attachment 2305380
I have got 35k score before. But they vary.
What I'm curious about is if the extra gig of ram on the note if it will eat up more battery. Cuz this battery is just insane
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow! What ROM were you running?
Thanks
its weird
I really find it odd that i sometimes get 35k max. But i just tested and look at this....
I only get like 30 thousand average on cm 10.2 you must have the furnace kernel
Sent from my VS980 4G using Tapatalk