I just what to watch some funny video,but I find this.
h t t p://player.youku.com/player.php/sid/XNTgzMjAwNDMy/v.swf
(I can't post outside links,copy it and delete the blanks)
maybe ads before the video,just ignore it.
when can nexus10 do this? is this something from google?
cenjiong said:
I just what to watch some funny video,but I find this.
h t t p://player.youku.com/player.php/sid/XNTgzMjAwNDMy/v.swf
(I can't post outside links,copy it and delete the blanks)
maybe ads before the video,just ignore it.
when can nexus10 do this? is this something from google?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mod will most likely delete. Your spamming.
DeadPhoenix said:
Mod will most likely delete. Your spamming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not a seller.I even don't know this device.I'm asking.
This is a product of Rockchip. That is a Rockchip device with Rockchip's version of Android OS 4.2.2.
You will not be seeing this on your device any time soon.
Related
http://www.addictivetips.com/mobile/nexus-one-froyo-ota-update-frf72/
already posted
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=700754
Whoooo... What a scoop...
flybyme said:
already posted
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=700754
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think this is needed. Its burried in the other one....
Keep this thread open mods.please
The other one does not have a link
LoL
Page 19, page 20 & more...
You guys do realize the other thread, the first 20 pages was people bashing/trolling the OP saying it was fake right?
So yeah, I have no issues with this thread, also those people who were denying it, especially wesbalmer should apologize LOL.
nxt said:
You guys do realize the other thread, the first 20 pages was people bashing/trolling the OP saying it was fake right?
So yeah, I have no issues with this thread, also those people who were denying it, especially wesbalmer should apologize LOL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly So lets not have that junk here. Unless in the other thread the OP is updated with links...
and maybe even update this thread once we get a "root" update.zip too
Will this one work with the AT&T phones? Or are we still outta luck?
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Simple thread does what it says on the tin!
has anyone found one difference with this new build?
gibosn6594 said:
has anyone found one difference with this new build?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The changelog states that there are only minor changes to the browser and flash support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have the changelog, but this is what I have read.
Markdental said:
I don't have the changelog, but this is what I have read.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, think I'll just wait for the OTA
I'm closing this thread and moving your attachment to the original FRF72 one. We won't want people looking into multiple threads for the same thing. Thanks
Look here. I have downloaded and tried it twice and can't get it to work.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BujRY_q53JI
It's a fake.
You should read other posts before falling for YouTube hokum.
cjmdaniels said:
It's a fake.
You should read other posts before falling for YouTube hokum.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know about the fake vids, but this has an application and everything. I didn't know this one was a fake. Did you want vid?
dubie76 said:
I know about the fake vids, but this has an application and everything. I didn't know this one was a fake. Did you want vid?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I watched it....fake imo
Ok, Cool. Mods close thread please...
this youtube video is worst fake ever. the links in the commentary redirect to some ad site.. please close this thread.
and yes android is possible now go check the real thread.
fake as hell... it re-directed me to some adware/spyware site
do you have the link to that thread?
Here you go sir.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=651632
dcordes said:
and yes android is possible now go check the real thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
snyper2k2 said:
Here you go sir.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=651632
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but before everyone dashes over there and starts posting 'how to instal android on my hd2' it doesn't work, yet, but it IS a massive step closer.
Cyanogen is saying its a bug. Tmo is saying its a feature. which one is correct?
If it is indeed a bug how would tmo go about fixing our phones? mass recall? sweep under the rug?
If its a feature, is it a precursor to what future phones will be?
Either outcome isnt very good for the consumer and may lead to lots of lost customers for tmo. Specially after tmo releasing a statement that its a feature of the phone.
I love this phone, the very first smartphone i ever had, and was really looking forward to hacking around with it but its hard to justify such a device that locks you out of such features. I hope cyanogen and all the other great devs work out a solution to this problem. I dont want to send it back.
looked for similar threads and couldnt find any.
info link:
h**p://phandroid.com/2010/10/11/cyanogen-calls-shenanigans-on-t-mobile-g2-root-fail-safe-mechanism/
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
d0nkey said:
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This......
SuperFly03 said:
This......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Absolutely this.
I read all post lol, but I need to do this question, Im always an Iphone user (tmobile network) I bought this G2, I keep reading that cant be root for now, I change it today because got blackout twices....
I dont know what the hell works the root thing.. Just an advices, should keep my G2? or wait for another android phone...
Still have 13 days for return
d0nkey said:
Read teh goddamn internets!
Wtf people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
care to elaborate?
s30zgt said:
care to elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you? lol...
AndroidNoober said:
Can you? lol...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First off learn to type in a understandable format. your previous post just butchers the english language.
Second, i can see that this thread will go nowhere. Mod can you please close this thread?
s30zgt said:
First off learn to type in a understandable format. your previous post just butchers the english language.
Second, i can see that this thread will go nowhere. Mod can you please close this thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I know my English is bad.. Is my second language.. I just trying to understand a little bit about this.. Spanish pages are from Mexico or Spain, harder to understand!!!
Like I said, sorry about that.
s30zgt said:
care to elaborate?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, here: Read the ****ing internet.
krayshunist said:
Sure, here: Read the ****ing internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow thanks man lol. I don't need your asinine comments that bring nothing to this thread. Mods please close this thread.
Wow... ppl are such asses..i dont see anything in here that warrants the op to be cursed at...ridiculous
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
People are being jerks for sure, but OP, you should search better cuz your question has been answered in several threads. The short of it is NO. It is not a bug in the sense you are thinking. It is an intentional bug which tricks linux (android os) into thinking writes to the system files during root are being made when in actuality, the writes are only being written to cache. Once the cache is cleared during reboot the root access is erased because it wasn't actually written to the system in the first place. It's not a bug that needs to be fixed. It's a bug that was placed there to fool the system and make permanent root more...challenging.
Wiki
s30zgt said:
Cyanogen is saying its a bug. Tmo is saying its a feature. which one is correct?
If it is indeed a bug how would tmo go about fixing our phones? mass recall? sweep under the rug?
If its a feature, is it a precursor to what future phones will be?
Either outcome isnt very good for the consumer and may lead to lots of lost customers for tmo. Specially after tmo releasing a statement that its a feature of the phone.
I love this phone, the very first smartphone i ever had, and was really looking forward to hacking around with it but its hard to justify such a device that locks you out of such features. I hope cyanogen and all the other great devs work out a solution to this problem. I dont want to send it back.
looked for similar threads and couldnt find any.
info link:
h**p://phandroid.com/2010/10/11/cyanogen-calls-shenanigans-on-t-mobile-g2-root-fail-safe-mechanism/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a very informational Wiki out. Check it out. It will get you up to date with all the work that has been done towards root.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/wiki/index.php?title=HTC_Vision#Rooting_the_G2
The important part of the question.. for me.. is whether the Z has the same bugFeature.
I see one random user saying that they flashed a G2 rom on a Desire Z and nothing more. Have I missed something? Kinda hard to say yay or nay based solely on that.
"Intentional Bug" ????
If it's intentional, it's NOT a bug.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Thank you XfooYen for the info. I did a quick search before I posted(the posting page even searches similar post before you publish them) and found nothing similar. I will make sure to search more thoroughly next time.
I am familiar with the current situation with root, I just though that if a well known developer like cyanogen thinks that its a bug that maybe the readers of xda might want to discuss his possible ratonale for such a statement, then again that may not have been what he was trying to say and got it misrepresented by the media. Instead I saw nothing but irrelevent and pointless posts. For a second I thought this was gizmodo or engadget.
Thank you again. Its good to know that xda has readers who actually know what they are talking about and not just the average troll.
androidtoy09 said:
"Intentional Bug" ????
If it's intentional, it's NOT a bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, you're wrong.
RT @cyanogen: @garok89 yeah, and the statement tmobile made is technically wrong. theres nothing that restores the phone, its actually what i'd call a bug
greengoldmello said:
Wow... ppl are such asses..i dont see anything in here that warrants the op to be cursed at...ridiculous
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. This is XDA. In the years I've been here, there was never this much flaming and douchery as there has been lately.
I have a themed facebook app, and I want to have the official one to do something since it is a little hard to see things with this theme. The apps are seen to be the same by the phone.
Is there a way I can have both apps installed at the same time? If I renamed the current app would it still work? Or what if I made one a system app?
Come on guys: nobody?
Going to bump this again
I kinda need this answered. Can anyone help?
I think it's time to go looking somewhere else for this. Have you tried the android software general forum? This question isn't specific to the DX. Or you could just TRY it and let us know what happens...
mrkite38 said:
I think it's time to go looking somewhere else for this. Have you tried the android software general forum? This question isn't specific to the DX. Or you could just TRY it and let us know what happens...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeing as I did try it, and said so in the op (how else would I know they are seen as the same app?) I'm not sure where you're going with that. Also, admin or not, posting unhelpful is worse than not posting at all
Jmoney47 said:
Seeing as I did try it, and said so in the op (how else would I know they are seen as the same app?) I'm not sure where you're going with that. Also, admin or not, posting unhelpful is worse than not posting at all
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought he was being helpful. If you post this question in the General section for ALL Android apps (again, this is not specific to our phone), there would be a larger group of people viewing the question. And I think when he said to try it, he already knew you tried installing both. But have you tried your own suggestion by renaming or making one a system app?
Not trying to be a smartass, just giving my interpretation on mrkite's post. I hope you find your answer, though!
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
zwade01 said:
I thought he was being helpful. If you post this question in the General section for ALL Android apps (again, this is not specific to our phone), there would be a larger group of people viewing the question. And I think when he said to try it, he already knew you tried installing both. But have you tried your own suggestion by renaming or making one a system app?
Not trying to be a smartass, just giving my interpretation on mrkite's post. I hope you find your answer, though!
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The system app way still wouldn't work because android would still recognize them as the same app so it would not work
zwade01 said:
I thought he was being helpful. If you post this question in the General section for ALL Android apps (again, this is not specific to our phone), there would be a larger group of people viewing the question. And I think when he said to try it, he already knew you tried installing both. But have you tried your own suggestion by renaming or making one a system app?
Not trying to be a smartass, just giving my interpretation on mrkite's post. I hope you find your answer, though!
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What he said. It sounds like you're about out of options, though...
I think we should all take a look at this.
As always, good job we have the outstanding Chainfire on our side
He has made an app for us to disable the exploit, cheers CF.
It is the second article down.
http://www.xda-developers.com/tag/all-android/
Get fixin lads... (and girls)
MJ-12
We already aware of the same its an old story already a post on this, but thanks anyways
samir_a said:
We already aware of the same its an old story already a post on this, but thanks anyways
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't see it, and I couldn't know to search for such a thing.
Maybe this should be pinned???
MJ-12
MJ-12 said:
I didn't see it, and I couldn't know to search for such a thing.
Maybe this should be pinned???
MJ-12
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2051147
This is the thread
Sent from my GT-N8000 using xda app-developers app
MJ-12 said:
I didn't see it, and I couldn't know to search for such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anybody that reads a tech website knows about it. Samsung's already put out a press release acknowledging the problem. When it's fixed, I'm sure they'll know about it before we will and put out another press release. Nothing's going to hijack your device that you don't allow. Don't visit sketchy websites, download iffy apps with a low number of users, and don't accept certificates from website's you're not comfortable with. For the time being I'd disable "Unknown sources" in settings and enable "Certificates" in the browsers security settings. Samir pointed out earlier the naive could get in trouble accidentally. We here aren't naive.
May be i used the wrong word what i ment was an normal user who is a layman when it comes to tech and believe there are many on this site to who come for advice.
Will i still be able to update to the jellybean ota after this root method?
sent from my "Ur IPhone will never do this" Phone
BarryH_GEG said:
Anybody that reads a tech website knows about it. Samsung's already put out a press release acknowledging the problem. When it's fixed, I'm sure they'll know about it before we will and put out another press release. Nothing's going to hijack your device that you don't allow. Don't visit sketchy websites, download iffy apps with a low number of users, and don't accept certificates from website's you're not comfortable with. For the time being I'd disable "Unknown sources" in settings and enable "Certificates" in the browsers security settings. Samir pointed out earlier the naive could get in trouble accidentally. We here aren't naive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wtf are you rambling about....
The guy said that he hadn't seen a post in this section, so posted it...
We are not rambling if read the post carefully the replies have nothing to do with member posting the same topic again.
and the way i see it we are having a discussion not grumbling
samir_a said:
We are not rambling if read the post carefully the replies have nothing to do with member posting the same topic again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didn't quote you, i quoted barryH.... maybe its a bad day, but i found the reply slightly condesending towards the op
the thread said:
MJ12 said:
I think we should all take a look at this.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
samir_a said:
We already aware of the same its an old story already a post on this, but thanks anyways
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
MJ12 said:
I didn't see it, and I couldn't know to search for such a thing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BarryH said:
MJ12 said:
[highlight] I didn't see it, and I couldn't know to search for such a thing.[/highlight]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anybody that reads a tech website knows about it.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
samir_a said:
We already aware of the same its an old story already a post on this, but thanks anyways
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just want to say - this is the most civil 'there's already a thread on this' post I've seen in quite a while. Kudos.