Hi.
Since many of us have some difficult to take some good quality photos please share your experience with your phone. You can upload photos and wrote about which options you chosen.
I'll share mine when i have time...
Cheers.
The camera quality depends on the ROM also, i think
IMO, Aurora v4 has a good camera even if in the low-light condition, but the shutter speed is not faster than v5.
You can't be serious.
You can do better photos and videos videos with official 2.2 (Froyo) than with Aurora, and I'm not being sarcastic. Its the honest truth. Test it! I did!
For me this is a key point when chosing a rom as I often need to take photos and videos with some quality.
I rather have batery drains, low speed etc etc but have good quality photos and videos and Aurora is a complete disgrace in this field.
At the moment theres no better and stable than MIUI V4.
Good quality photo, specially outside that are just excellent and great 720p videos, without being blury, pixelized and without FREEZES!
If you want good quality cam, then MIUI V4 is the best choice so far this is not questionable.
Some might say the libs from MIUI are the same from Aurora etc etc. This is just Bla bla bla from people that didn't even tested nor compared both, because if they did they would see differences, Huge differences
Djuganight said:
.Some might say the libs from MIUI are the same from Aurora etc etc. This is just Bla bla bla from people that didn't even tested nor compared both, because if they did they would see differences, Huge differences
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, exactly the same !!!
Tell me what's version of MIUI v4 you were mentioned !
my version of MIUI V4 PT 2.12.21
test it and put here the photos taken with the diferent roms
I want to see if they are exactly the same....
Did anyone change camera options? Specifically these ones: "Sharpness" and "Focus mode".
Off course.
But photos are just not vivid. Something is not right there
Djuganight said:
my version of MIUI V4 PT 2.12.21
test it and put here the photos taken with the diferent roms
I want to see if they are exactly the same....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ro.build.display.id=Aurora_5.0_u9 4.0.4 IMM76I eng.martin.20120605.162907 test-keys
ro.build.version.incremental=2.12.21
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, no need to test, the same !!
I also hope they are not the same, hope MIUI camera get better than Aurora, but ....:angel:
Ok keep the bicycle
Today I went to the park with the kids and took 2 backups with me, one for Aurora and one for Miui.
I have made a lot o photos with both roms testing lots of settings and 3 cam apps (native, cam360 and huawei cam).
Miui took beautiful and vivid photos while photos with Aurora where very clear look like the sun was immediately in front.
But one significant detail was, my son had a white hat and with Aurora the hat got a bluish tone looking like it's getting extreme white balance. If you understand about photos more white balancing the bluish the photo becomes.
Even reducing the white balancing the photos gets very dark.
Clear conclusion that is the libs are the same something is influencing a lot the quality of Aurora photos and it's a pleasure watch the outdoor photos and videos made with miui
Djuganight said:
Today I went to the park with the kids and took 2 backups with me, one for Aurora and one for Miui.
I have made a lot o photos with both roms testing lots of settings and 3 cam apps (native, cam360 and huawei cam).
Miui took beautiful and vivid photos while photos with Aurora where very clear look like the sun was immediately in front.
But one significant detail was, my son had a white hat and with Aurora the hat got a bluish tone looking like it's getting extreme white balance. If you understand about photos more white balancing the bluish the photo becomes.
Even reducing the white balancing the photos gets very dark.
Clear conclusion that is the libs are the same something is influencing a lot the quality of Aurora photos and it's a pleasure watch the outdoor photos and videos made with miui
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But is not possible we can change libs from one to another and then MIUI options can port to Aurora? Still both of them should have same quality i think...
AURORA PHOTOS
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
MIUI V4 PHOTOS
[URL=http://imageshack.us/photos/my-images/836/img20130427114138.jpg/]
Taken with the exact same specs.
Se the vivid and REAL colours of MIUI photos and see the extreme exposure + more dark colours of Aurora.
See the hat of the kid...
If you can't see the differences don't know what more can I do.
We can't contest true facts friend.
Now, I do believe that libs from MIUI are the same as Aurora but why the 8 to 80 difference?
Wow, love the kute baby
The exposure value seems to be changed by the light direction of your position. I'm not a photographer, just it's my experience.
Camera lib in aurora v5 seems to has some problem i thinks, it isn't good at the exposure capture (in auto mode), sometime it becomes crazy @@. And in this case, camera lib in Aurora v4 has done perfectly. I don't know dzo he has noticed about that or not, but i don't want to push him, he has alot work for other things. No big deal, it's enough for our phone.
And one more time, IMO, nothing difference bettwen Aurora vs MIUI v4 about camera libs.
O.M.G.......
Too much bright on Aurora photo you can see in park bench wood isn't brown. In MIUI photos have real color. Quality is same or both just some config on how camera holds contrast and brightness better on MIUI.
But MIUI v4 use libs from Aurora version 4 or 5?
not just the bench, see the baby hat is kinda blue tone....
these were photos taken with EXACT SAME SPECS with both rooms.
If you reduce brightness on Aurora than the Photos start to get very dark.
I have made all the possible combinations and just cant get the same output as MIUI.
So you can have na Idea, I have 2 batteries and I depleted both in aprox 2hours reboots, restire downlodas, vídeos, photos etc etc...
something is messing the photo output of Aurora and this what makes me completly crazy for not being able to use the rom.
Djuganight said:
not just the bench, see the baby hat is kinda blue tone....
these were photos taken with EXACT SAME SPECS with both rooms.
If you reduce brightness on Aurora than the Photos start to get very dark.
I have made all the possible combinations and just cant get the same output as MIUI.
So you can have na Idea, I have 2 batteries and I depleted both in aprox 2hours reboots, restire downlodas, vídeos, photos etc etc...
something is messing the photo output of Aurora and this what makes me completly crazy for not being able to use the rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! The hat is some blue lines
I love to test MIUI but unfortunately i don't have my phone is in service. And i think your MIUI V4 doesn't work on my u8800 because of atmel has i previous tried.
Hope dzo read this thread and do something changes on his rom.
Just flash normal Miui v4, from Miui PT for example. That will work in your device.
Mine won't work because the changes I have made mess with atmel screens
This morning I printed the media_profiles.xlm file, located in
/system/etc of both roms and confirm many differences between them.
Then I restore a Aurora backup and replaced this file with Miui and rebooted.
Made no difference at all and photo still come out extra white making it bluish looking.
Tried to decrease the white balance by -1 point and increase the saturation but the photos are bad the same way.
I do notice one thing intriguing. I would like you to test it to.
You need to pay attention to this, In Aurora note than when execute the cam app, immediately it starts the image is great but suddenly changes to that extra white and bluish tone. This happens on starting the app and in a fraction of a second. You need to pay attention!
I'm 99% sure that some setting in the system gets affected resulting in this change, and here lies the issue.
This doesn't happen in Miui.
I honestly think this is it, and worth looking after it specially if something can be done to correct this behaviour.
If the system gets changed this way, something acts different between these roms, causing conflict without causing error on Aurora.
Imagine this situation, look like each Rom uses a different colour pallet and colour spectrum, obviously resulting in photos with different colour schemes. Understand what I mean!
This is it for sure!!
Can you guys check these situations and can the devs look to please. Aurora could be even better!
Djuganight said:
This morning I printed the media_profiles.xlm file, located in
/system/etc of both roms and confirm many differences between them.
Then I restore a Aurora backup and replaced this file with Miui and rebooted.
Made no difference at all and photo still come out extra white making it bluish looking.
Tried to decrease the white balance by -1 point and increase the saturation but the photos are bad the same way.
I do notice one thing intriguing. I would like you to test it to.
You need to pay attention to this, In Aurora note than when execute the cam app, immediately it starts the image is great but suddenly changes to that extra white and bluish tone. This happens on starting the app and in a fraction of a second. You need to pay attention!
I'm 99% sure that some setting in the system gets affected resulting in this change, and here lies the issue.
This doesn't happen in Miui.
I honestly think this is it, and worth looking after it specially if something can be done to correct this behaviour.
If the system gets changed this way, something acts different between these roms, causing conflict without causing error on Aurora.
Imagine this situation, look like each Rom uses a different colour pallet and colour spectrum, obviously resulting in photos with different colour schemes. Understand what I mean!
This is it for sure!!
Can you guys check these situations and can the devs look to please. Aurora could be even better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I think Aurora v5 has the problem with the Exposure value (Iso:Auto and Scene Mode: Auto).
Did you check this in Aurora version 4 ?
Thanks for you post.
Related
I'm sure like me, many people here have installed the camera hotfix by now. is anyone else's flash super bright now after the second flash? taking pictures in the dark is near impossible now. all I get is a white blob of what should be the person I'm taking a picture of lol...
Yes mine is now super bright Ive not been able to tome it down yet
This problem has been discussed before on this forum (try searching for it) and has been a problem even before the hotfix. Looks like HTC will need to come out with a second hotfix.
Well, for me the hotfix worked realy well, and the flash now is better then ever.
RRibeiro said:
Well, for me the hotfix worked realy well, and the flash now is better then ever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try to take a picture of something close to you. Or in a dark environment, take a picture of a person sitting right across the table from you.
Yes, using flash on close-in objects is useless. All you get is a bright picture. This ain't good.
Here is a picture I just made with my HD2.
It was takem 20cm away with flash on.
EDIT: Sorry, my mistake. Now it's the photo with flash.
RRibeiro
Is that picture with the lights on or off?
Problem happens with flash on in dark environments.
Still it's not a good picture. Look at the bottom of the picture, not good. There's room for improvement IMO.
Not just in dark environments, see attached pictures of HTC Official Online Store discount card (for scale, it's about the size of a credit card) taken at my office (with rather bright ambient light).
I installed the hotfix and I'm loving the camera now. Better color, better overall image. And the strange hue is gone. Also tested the flash, it's not the best flash ever of course, but coming from a no-flash at all (HD), I'm satisfied enough. It does the job fine.
try taking a photo of yourself at arms length
you'll be blind for a bit, plus the photo will be way too bright
totally agree...the hot-fix has now ruined all close up flash photographs as it just burns out to a bright white blob. Very poor.
(and in doing so they only managed to reduce, not eliminate the pink blob without the flash)
double post due to Bad Gateway...
I don't see anything that was "ruined" by the hotfix, it was the same without it.
Response From [ Amany (South East EU Support (Tech)) ]
Thank you for contacting us,
Regarding your enquiry, kindly follow the steps below:
Start>Settings>System>Remove Programs
Please remove the update you have installed and check the performance of the device. Kindly install the update once again.
Please note that you can contact us via support line. For further details, please go to http://www.htc.com/europe/CA_Hotline.aspx
you'll find a toll free number that you can dial only from a landline.
Best Regards,
HTC Team
Working for me.
Fixed the bright flash issue... i just dont know how??
If this is a little late and the issue has already been addressed, then my apologies.
Anyway, Yesterday, i was becoming very annoyed with the sudden increase in flash power since the pink blob hotfix, so i started looking at what the problem might be.
Firstly it appeared that the problem was that the timing was slightly wrong with regards to the exposure. So i looked through all the settings and started switching features on and off in the hope that there might be an action that delayed the exposure long enough to get a good reading.
Basically this became boring very quickly as i was not getting any change in the result but while my attention lagged in the task, i must have made the essential change.
Now the flash works exactly as it did before the Hotfix!
Now the question is: who else still has this problem and would you be willing to try adjusting all the settings to achieve the same result... but this time with more attention to detail than i had.
As far as i can remember the setting i had adjusted were Shutter sound "ON" and wide-screen "ON", then went back and turned them off again.
Its a long shot, but something made it work.
For me, the flash is still too much bright. I have to disable it. And the HTC update didn't solve the pink blur at all. And i don't talk about the JPEG compression which is awful.
Well this camera is just a disaster ...
Lucius Snow said:
For me, the flash is still too much bright. I have to disable it. And the HTC update didn't solve the pink blur at all. And i don't talk about the JPEG compression which is awful.
Well this camera is just a disaster ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree about the flash power... only way for a hotfix to address that issue would be to decrease the duration of the flash when it fires.
Disagree about the camera being a disaster overall... with the hotfix and the settings tweaked (contrast +4, sat +3, sharpness +4), the HD2 camera takes pics that are pretty-much identical in overall quality to my Nokia N95 8GB.
ian_uk1975 said:
Agree about the flash power... only way for a hotfix to address that issue would be to decrease the duration of the flash when it fires.
Disagree about the camera being a disaster overall... with the hotfix and the settings tweaked (contrast +4, sat +3, sharpness +4), the HD2 camera takes pics that are pretty-much identical in overall quality to my Nokia N95 8GB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Compared to my previous phones (Asus P525 and P750), the quality is very bad when you look the picture at 100% of the real size. All JPEG artefacts are hudge. I prefer a medium resolution and good JPEG compression than high resolution and bad JPEG compression.
When I take photos with the camera, I am seeing a distinct magenta color cast in the center of the photo and green cast to the edges. Is seeing the same thing with their photos? The first image is of an off-white wall. The second is of beige carpeting. Both should have uniform color. I've tried various white balance settings and the cast remains. I get the same effect from video.
Since I don't notice this in any of the posted photos in the picture thread, I guess I have to assume my camera is tweaked. I really didn't want to RMA this otherwise stellar phone.
I mean seriously, I love this phone!
Edit: I am running CM 10.1 with pinky kernel. That wouldn't effect the camera app would it?
esoxx said:
When I take photos with the camera, I am seeing a distinct magenta color cast in the center of the photo and green cast to the edges. Is seeing the same thing with their photos? The first image is of an off-white wall. The second is of beige carpeting. Both should have uniform color. I've tried various white balance settings and the cast remains. I get the same effect from video.
Since I don't notice this in any of the posted photos in the picture thread, I guess I have to assume my camera is tweaked. I really didn't want to RMA this otherwise stellar phone.
I mean seriously, I love this phone!
Edit: I am running CM 10.1 with pinky kernel. That wouldn't effect the camera app would it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash a stock rom or another custom rom and see how the pictures look then. Or flash a different custom kernel with color control options like Faux, Franco kernel etc etc.
esoxx said:
When I take photos with the camera, I am seeing a distinct magenta color cast in the center of the photo and green cast to the edges. Is seeing the same thing with their photos? The first image is of an off-white wall. The second is of beige carpeting. Both should have uniform color. I've tried various white balance settings and the cast remains. I get the same effect from video.
Since I don't notice this in any of the posted photos in the picture thread, I guess I have to assume my camera is tweaked. I really didn't want to RMA this otherwise stellar phone.
I mean seriously, I love this phone!
Edit: I am running CM 10.1 with pinky kernel. That wouldn't effect the camera app would it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you UV? If so, try increasing by 50-100 mV and see if that fixes it.
Sent by carrier pigeon
gee2012 said:
Flash a stock rom or another custom rom and see how the pictures look then. Or flash a different custom kernel with color control options like Faux, Franco kernel etc etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aren't the color control options intended for the display? This isn't a screen issue, it's a cast that is introduced by the camera.
klvnhng said:
Do you UV? If so, try increasing by 50-100 mV and see if that fixes it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not undervolting.
I'll try a different rom and see if it shows up there.
Thanks for the suggestions.
gee2012 said:
Flash a stock rom or another custom rom and see how the pictures look then. Or flash a different custom kernel with color control options like Faux, Franco kernel etc etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried the Franco kernel and as expected it had no effect on this. I went through some of the photos in the Post Your Pictures thread and it seems that many of the low light/no flash photos have similar color casts. You can't really expect great camera results in a phone at this price range, so I'm not disappointed. I just wanted to make sure that my camera wasn't broken. In full light, it's fine.
Hey,
Can I get some full quality pictures posted from the Note 4 Front Camera? Good & Bad lighting, With and Without Beautyface.
They don't need to be selfies, but I would like a few to be.
I noticed my Note 4 when taking front camera pictures and selfies suck compared to my Note 3.
I tried recreating the same pictures (same room, same lighting, same angle) I took with the Note 3 and the White Balance is way off, there are more artifacts, and distortion, and the pictures really are not in focus, especially at a minor distance on the Note 4. Even lights in pictures have an starburst/halo effect that others don't seem to get on the same shot.
I contacted Samsung and they had me pretty much clear app cache and data and factory reset the mobile. Not much help.
I wanted to see if this is just the norm for the Note 4 or if I have a bad cmos sensor or whatever before I send it for repair or exchange.
With full spectrum daylight led and cfl bulbs, all front pictures are yellow hueued. Adjusting the white balance helps, but shows more artifacts and can't be done in apps like snapchat, skype, google hangouts... pretty much anything you would use a front camera for that's not a camera app selfie. I even have a softbox setup with proper professional lighting and images show up with lots of artifacts and halos.
It's almost as if it's ever slightly out of focus and when the system API jpeg compresses it, it shows sloppy artifacts.
My cat took a selfie the other day! Lol! Not sure if this will get alot of replies. Most of us are too ugly for front camera shots
sino8r said:
My cat took a selfie the other day! Lol! Not sure if this will get alot of replies. Most of us are too ugly for front camera shots
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, they don't have to be face shots. Like point it at a bottle of something with text on it or pictures.
htmltag said:
Thanks, they don't have to be face shots. Like point it at a bottle of something with text on it or pictures.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I know. Couldn't resist though. Hehehehe! I'll play around with it some and see if I notice what you mentioned. What rom are you using? Have you tried the camera mod and talked to the guy who's been modifying the camera apk? Here's the link...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4/themes-apps/mod-camera-quality-mod-t2917502
sino8r said:
Yeah I know. Couldn't resist though. Hehehehe! I'll play around with it some and see if I notice what you mentioned. What rom are you using? Have you tried the camera mod and talked to the guy who's been modifying the camera apk? Here's the link...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4/themes-apps/mod-camera-quality-mod-t2917502
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm on Stock Rooted Rom.
I have used multiple apps with the same result.
Apps that allow you to adjust the exposure and white balance can compensate a little.
I have a feeling when Android 5.x is released for our phones, if Samsung updates the driver to allow raw images, things would get a lot better.
It would be nice if you could adjust camera variable defaults in the OS for applications that don't provide an interface to them.
I am definitely going to check out that modded camera app. Thanks for pointing me at it.
Even if it doesn't make a difference, "No audio interruption if listening to music" alone is worth it.
htmltag said:
I'm on Stock Rooted Rom.
I have used multiple apps with the same result.
Apps that allow you to adjust the exposure and white balance can compensate a little.
I have a feeling when Android 5.x is released for our phones, if Samsung updates the driver to allow raw images, things would get a lot better.
It would be nice if you could adjust camera variable defaults in the OS for applications that don't provide an interface to them.
I am definitely going to check out that modded camera app. Thanks for pointing me at it.
Even if it doesn't make a difference, "No audio interruption if listening to music" alone is worth it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah mine seems a little like that with the modded camera. I noticed the yellowed tint a little but it seems to be related to the lack of flash and it seems like it's being processed like it's in low light mode to make up for lack of a flash. Have you tried in day outside with alot of light? Might help a little. Not a fan of those low light/night modes. They are alway pixeled up and blurry. Look like sh!t most of the time. I've never used the front facing camera much on my phone or even on my computer. All my friends, family, and gf live here in town so I haven't had much need for it much. Sucks, I know, for those who need it. But!... Like you said, the lack of timer, audio interruptions and now that the camera works while on a phone call makes the camera mod worth it. Maybe the driver could be modded or at least the software related to it could be cleaned up by a dev or future updates might improve stuff some. You never know... Let us know if you think the camera mod helped any with the FFC at all. I just don't use it enough to know for sure. Thanks!
Selfie
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Thanks donnyp1, it appears you have Christmas spirits in there. You're in the spirit, you have spirits (drinks), and it looks like there is a Christmas Spirit hovering behind you guys.
All over it. This phone takes great selfies. This wasnt one of my better ones. Merry Christmas
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Representin'
I thought this might be appropriate...
The AT&T version never took sloppy shots. I'm experiencing a poor performing front facing camera on the T-Mobile Note 4 as well. Solution is, use the rear facing camera.
htmltag said:
Hey,
Can I get some full quality pictures posted from the Note 4 Front Camera? Good & Bad lighting, With and Without Beautyface.
They don't need to be selfies, but I would like a few to be.
I noticed my Note 4 when taking front camera pictures and selfies suck compared to my Note 3.
I tried recreating the same pictures (same room, same lighting, same angle) I took with the Note 3 and the White Balance is way off, there are more artifacts, and distortion, and the pictures really are not in focus, especially at a minor distance on the Note 4. Even lights in pictures have an starburst/halo effect that others don't seem to get on the same shot.
I contacted Samsung and they had me pretty much clear app cache and data and factory reset the mobile. Not much help.
I wanted to see if this is just the norm for the Note 4 or if I have a bad cmos sensor or whatever before I send it for repair or exchange.
With full spectrum daylight led and cfl bulbs, all front pictures are yellow hueued. Adjusting the white balance helps, but shows more artifacts and can't be done in apps like snapchat, skype, google hangouts... pretty much anything you would use a front camera for that's not a camera app selfie. I even have a softbox setup with proper professional lighting and images show up with lots of artifacts and halos.
It's almost as if it's ever slightly out of focus and when the system API jpeg compresses it, it shows sloppy artifacts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's an unfortunate answer.
I notice with face beauty set to 4 and up it creates a blur effect so I slide all the way off and my images are sharper but I haven't noticed and yellow tint that some of you are reporting.
So here comes a long post, sorry upfront
Being a professional (fashion) photographer, and personally a true lover of good photos and all that entails photo quality, the main thing I look for in a smartphone is the best possible camera. So after some reviews I decided to get the new Samsung S10+.
And I am not happy at all.
Problems:
1. There are only «natural» and «vivid» modes for the screen «calibration». Natural shows really flat tones and saturation, and vivid (with all the other adjustments) can't get anywhere close to render tones appropriately. It washes out all the highlights to blend them with those a bit darker - no depth; some colors pop out intensely (strong reds for example) while others don't match.
Along with that neither of the two modes helps to get the dark tones shown as dark as they really are, the shadows are always too bright, which adds to the washed out look of photos/low contrast.
This alone made me want to return it, until I figured out a way to make it better - by leaving it on Vivid, and turning on blue light filter on 0 - 15% opacity. Not sure why from the blue light filter, but the colors and white balance are all much more true this way than on either natural on vivid, and the contrast is better a bit, so I suggest you try it out
2. Software in the camera has an inexcusable bug (at least I hope it's a bug and it will be fixed with an update soon):
HDR is not selected, I take a photo, immediately go open it, get a spinning circle on the lower part of the screen for maybe a second, and the photo shifts in front of my eyes to an HDR kind of photo.. washes out all the highlights, pumps and fades the shadows, leaving really noticeable blotchy artifacts where there were shadows (being a professional photographer I spot that immediately, so maybe some of you haven't payed attention, but I promise you there are blotchy artifacts in brightened shadows on any S10+ camera). Obviously it does that via software in the second after the photo was taken, so you can notice it only if you open the photo from the camera app immediately after it was taken. If you continue shooting the same scene (same light), for the next immediate shot you won't see it changing, so it obviously remembers some «settings» it applies. Just mentioning this if you go try out, you can see that shift best while changing the scenes you take photos of (brighter, darker, etc).
SO - S10+ takes HDR photos, or makes HDR processing to photos, when HDR is not turned on!
And it does a lousy job at it, because the photos in general look really washed out - the are no whites, no blacks, no contrast or depth. They obviously look better on my calibrated desktop screen, because as I mentioned before, the screen on S10+ lacks in contrast of the shadows as well as in the photos, so putting those together - all the photos on S10+ screen look dull and without contrast. Other issue is that most of the times when I tried photographing the same scene with HDR on and HDR off, photos looked the same, and in some cases with HDR on it would do just a stronger HDR. Please, please, does anyone have any idea how to stop it from processing photos taken without HDR to make them look like I actually wanted that dullness?
P.s. today I did a test with Note9 and S9+, neither have that problem.
3. This is not just Samsung's problem, at least I know Huawei Mate 20Pro has the same problem - photo effects inside the camera and extra ones that you can get are so outdated that they are unusable. In today's world driven by instagram and all the apps for color «filters» (VSCO, Snapseed, etc), these on Samsung are prehistoric. I tried to find a way to make my own and load them somehow, but can't find a way. Any ideas?
4. Same scene photographed with S10+ is 3mb, and with my older Samsung S7 it's 4mb. How can that be? Why isn't there no more a setting in the camera app to choose resolution?
Looking forward to your thoughts! I love everything else about this phone, but can't stand those HDR photos from the get go, would hate to go return it just because of it..
Go to Camera, settings, save options, check if you have "HEIF pictures" enabled.
This is the same format iPhones use now if i'm not mistaken. This format saves the pictures in half size as compared to JPEG.
Unselect it and test new pictures if it improves to your picture taste.
Another option is to use GCAM (Google Camera) app. This app is directly from Google for the Pixel phones converted to use in our Galaxy S10 phones. You can get them here in XDA
HEIF pictures are not enabled.
I tried to find GCAM mod for Exynos S10+, but can't find one.. since you mentioned it, do you maybe know of one somewhere? Not sure if I'm missing something, new to XDA..
Thanks!
jbalic said:
So here comes a long post, sorry upfront
Being a professional (fashion) photographer, and personally a true lover of good photos and all that entails photo quality, the main thing I look for in a smartphone is the best possible camera. So after some reviews I decided to get the new Samsung S10+.
And I am not happy at all.
Problems:
1. There are only «natural» and «vivid» modes for the screen «calibration». Natural shows really flat tones and saturation, and vivid (with all the other adjustments) can't get anywhere close to render tones appropriately. It washes out all the highlights to blend them with those a bit darker - no depth; some colors pop out intensely (strong reds for example) while others don't match.
Along with that neither of the two modes helps to get the dark tones shown as dark as they really are, the shadows are always too bright, which adds to the washed out look of photos/low contrast.
This alone made me want to return it, until I figured out a way to make it better - by leaving it on Vivid, and turning on blue light filter on 0 - 15% opacity. Not sure why from the blue light filter, but the colors and white balance are all much more true this way than on either natural on vivid, and the contrast is better a bit, so I suggest you try it out
2. Software in the camera has an inexcusable bug (at least I hope it's a bug and it will be fixed with an update soon):
HDR is not selected, I take a photo, immediately go open it, get a spinning circle on the lower part of the screen for maybe a second, and the photo shifts in front of my eyes to an HDR kind of photo.. washes out all the highlights, pumps and fades the shadows, leaving really noticeable blotchy artifacts where there were shadows (being a professional photographer I spot that immediately, so maybe some of you haven't payed attention, but I promise you there are blotchy artifacts in brightened shadows on any S10+ camera). Obviously it does that via software in the second after the photo was taken, so you can notice it only if you open the photo from the camera app immediately after it was taken. If you continue shooting the same scene (same light), for the next immediate shot you won't see it changing, so it obviously remembers some «settings» it applies. Just mentioning this if you go try out, you can see that shift best while changing the scenes you take photos of (brighter, darker, etc).
SO - S10+ takes HDR photos, or makes HDR processing to photos, when HDR is not turned on!
And it does a lousy job at it, because the photos in general look really washed out - the are no whites, no blacks, no contrast or depth. They obviously look better on my calibrated desktop screen, because as I mentioned before, the screen on S10+ lacks in contrast of the shadows as well as in the photos, so putting those together - all the photos on S10+ screen look dull and without contrast. Other issue is that most of the times when I tried photographing the same scene with HDR on and HDR off, photos looked the same, and in some cases with HDR on it would do just a stronger HDR. Please, please, does anyone have any idea how to stop it from processing photos taken without HDR to make them look like I actually wanted that dullness?
P.s. today I did a test with Note9 and S9+, neither have that problem.
3. This is not just Samsung's problem, at least I know Huawei Mate 20Pro has the same problem - photo effects inside the camera and extra ones that you can get are so outdated that they are unusable. In today's world driven by instagram and all the apps for color «filters» (VSCO, Snapseed, etc), these on Samsung are prehistoric. I tried to find a way to make my own and load them somehow, but can't find a way. Any ideas?
4. Same scene photographed with S10+ is 3mb, and with my older Samsung S7 it's 4mb. How can that be? Why isn't there no more a setting in the camera app to choose resolution?
Looking forward to your thoughts! I love everything else about this phone, but can't stand those HDR photos from the get go, would hate to go return it just because of it..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
best camera phone?
Pixel3
Mate20Pro
Yes, I have a S10.
Its the second one, the first was so bad with the screen and with the camera.
Se Second one is good in camera and very good in the screen.
But it not compares with my Mate20Pro in the camera.
Well, Pixel3 and Mate20Pro were definitely top choices along with S10+, shades decided.. I have a week left to return it and go for either of these two if I don't find a way to resolve this, or decide to play lottery by waiting on a software upgrade which would fix it. And that doesn't seem like a good idea..
What was wrong with the screen and camera of your first S10? Mine feels very wrong, my first instinct was to go exchange it, but then I tried out others in different stores and got the same thing with them concerning screen and camera :/ stunned it could be this awful.
jbalic said:
Well, Pixel3 and Mate20Pro were definitely top choices along with S10+, shades decided.. I have a week left to return it and go for either of these two if I don't find a way to resolve this, or decide to play lottery by waiting on a software upgrade which would fix it. And that doesn't seem like a good idea..
What was wrong with the screen and camera of your first S10? Mine feels very wrong, my first instinct was to go exchange it, but then I tried out others in different stores and got the same thing with them concerning screen and camera :/ stunned it could be this awful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my first S10 was updated and the camera was very bad.
The screen was dull, with low brightness comparing with my Mate20Pro.
This one didn't update an the camera is soo much good but the detail that my Mate20Pro captures its insane.
And the screen its top notch!
I think I will not update the software... for now..
For me, its a display problem. I looked at this photo comparing the XS and the S10 https:// photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/30033-48976-iPhone-XS-Max-and-Samsung-Galaxy-S10-Plus-Human-Portrait-mode-l.jpg and compared it side to side from my s10 to my macbook and on the S10 its pale, like the guy is dead. What's the problem with the display?? I shouldnt have to activate color adjustment, no ?
Color Washed
Just a heads up to everyone who has the S10. The color saturation of the screen even when Vivid is enabled doesn't display the saturation correctly... To fix this "enable blue light filter" and set it at the lowest possible then go back and look at a picture you will see how it is no longer washed out. I assume they are going to fix this in a future update. Cheers ?
---------- Post added at 01:01 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:44 AM ----------
XDromeda said:
For me, its a display problem. I looked at this photo comparing the XS and the S10 https:// photos5.appleinsider.com/gallery/30033-48976-iPhone-XS-Max-and-Samsung-Galaxy-S10-Plus-Human-Portrait-mode-l.jpg and compared it side to side from my s10 to my macbook and on the S10 its pale, like the guy is dead. What's the problem with the display?? I shouldnt have to activate color adjustment, no ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turn on Blue Light Filter and set the effect to minimum. This will correct the "dull" look and restore the full color saturation
jbalic said:
Well, Pixel3 and Mate20Pro were definitely top choices along with S10+, shades decided.. I have a week left to return it and go for either of these two if I don't find a way to resolve this, or decide to play lottery by waiting on a software upgrade which would fix it. And that doesn't seem like a good idea..
What was wrong with the screen and camera of your first S10? Mine feels very wrong, my first instinct was to go exchange it, but then I tried out others in different stores and got the same thing with them concerning screen and camera :/ stunned it could be this awful.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turn on Blue light filter and set the effect to minimum, then go and check the color saturation ? I'm sure they will be fixing this in a future update.
dmdelgado said:
Turn on Blue light filter and set the effect to minimum, then go and check the color saturation I'm sure they will be fixing this in a future update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wrote in my original post that the best you can get out of this screen is by turning on blue light at minimum; managed to find that, helps at least 80%. But the camera HDR shadowless dimensionless photos - worst software processing of any Samsung phone up to date. I have 5 days to return it for full amount, so I'll do that, don't want to take chances on waiting for that update if it even comes.. Then I'll just wait a bit for either them to fix it and I buy it again (I am only sad to leave the superior battery and wide angle camera, that's it) or wait for a new Huawei or Pixel to see what they're up to.
dmdelgado said:
Turn on Blue light filter and set the effect to minimum, then go and check the color saturation I'm sure they will be fixing this in a future update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much!!! You made my day guys!
Professional photographer yet you don't know about HEIF?
As a professional fashion photographer you should also know that you shouldn't rely on what the picture looks like on the display because many different factors come into play. Some displays and brighter than others just like some are for saturated. As long as you know that you're lighting and exposure is correct you should be fine.
On another note you can also save a raw file of the image.
-Alan said:
As a professional fashion photographer you should also know that you shouldn't rely on what the picture looks like on the display because many different factors come into play. Some displays and brighter than others just like some are for saturated. As long as you know that you're lighting and exposure is correct you should be fine.
On another note you can also save a raw file of the image.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Corv0 said:
Professional photographer yet you don't know about HEIF?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@Corv0:
how can HEIF help me with lousy color and luminosity rendering (screen problem) and bad software processing (camera problem)?
@-Alan: maybe you should read my first post again? I already wrote that the screen on S10+ is poorly calibrated (no really dark tones = bad contrast, color shift, natural and vivid modes are both awful, blue light filter on low opacity saves it mostly, still not good enough compared to most other phone screens I used); and that photos look a bit better contrast wise on my calibrated desktop screen. That doesn't make it ok if I use a lousy screen on my phone all the time and look at photos on it which are miles away from saying "yeah, I know amoled phone screen can't be anywhere close to my Eizo but it's good enough for a phone".
There will always be compromises, but this is too big of a compromise if everything looks awful on the screen of a phone I use extensively every day.
That goes for the screen, and then there is the added problem of bad processing of photos from the camera, which I can't counteract on except shooting everything raw. So when you mention being ok with knowing the exposure is ok - for everyday use of phone camera I will never shoot anything in RAW because that would require spending extra hours and hours to postprocess everything on my own to usable jpegs, which is not why raw is there in phones in the first place. Camera in a phone like this should give you good enough starting point of their jpeg processing so you don't need to do it on your own to make it look ok for everyday stuff. This one doesn't. And if it forces users to shoot everything in RAW to make it look ok, that's a huge fail. On any professional SLR camera you will shoot RAW when it's important or desired to get the look of a jpeg better than the one the camera processes, but you can rely on mostly any SLR camera to give you a decent jpeg if your exposure is ok (shutter speed, aperture, WB, focus, ISO). S10+ simply does not produce a good enough jpeg to start with when the exposure is ok, because it processes that jpeg as a lousy HDR when HDR is off, and by lousy I mean shadowless, flat, wihout any depth and dimension. That is not my problem while taking photos (exposure wise), it's a software problem.
Well then either wait for updates or change phone Mr Photographer, I personally dont agree with you at any point so I can't provide any help either.
Corv0 said:
Well then either wait for updates or change phone Mr Photographer, I personally dont agree with you at any point so I can't provide any help either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lousy puns with no merit, but ok. Still didn't get a reply from you - how does HEIF help anything I outlined as issues on this phone? This MRS Photographer doesn't know so I'd be happy if you could enlighten me? Thanks.
jbalic said:
Lousy puns with no merit, but ok. Still didn't get a reply from you - how does HEIF help anything I outlined as issues on this phone? This MRS Photographer doesn't know so I'd be happy if you could enlighten me? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said HEIF is supposed to help anything.
jbalic said:
4. Same scene photographed with S10+ is 3mb, and with my older Samsung S7 it's 4mb. How can that be? Why isn't there no more a setting in the camera app to choose resolution?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just pointing out how this stupid question contradicts the rest of your boasting around, you should have studied that in your course.
But yes, you can change resolution by changing aspect ratio in the main interface, there's absolutely no other reason to provide multiple resolutions besides for ratio testing, if you are so worried about size you can digitally reduce the resolution in the post-processing phase.
*edited to remove accidental double post
Corv0 said:
I never said HEIF is supposed to help anything.
Just pointing out how this stupid question contradicts the rest of your boasting around, you should have studied that in your course.
But yes, you can change resolution by changing aspect ratio in the main interface, there's absolutely no other reason to provide multiple resolutions besides for ratio testing, if you are so worried about size you can digitally reduce the resolution in the post-processing phase.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are really trolling me here.. first you write "Professional photographer yet you don't know about HEIF?", than I ask what you meant by that since I never mentioned HEIF anywhere, besides answering a question of another poster if it was turned on maybe, and the answer was no. HEIF has no influence on any problem I wrote of. Trolling.
As for the resolution, it hardly underestimates my profession or knowledge, which, I assure you is vast on matters like this. Older Samsung phones had a choice between two resolutions for the same aspect ratio (for example 4:3 in Samsung S7 you can choose 12M, or 6.2M; for 16:9 9.1M or 3.7M etc.). On S10+ there is only one resolution for 4:3 or any ratio, and its low.
So I still see no merit to your undermining my knowledge in what I do professionally, except to troll or just be rude.
jbalic said:
You are really trolling me here.. first you write "Professional photographer yet you don't know about HEIF?", than I ask what you meant by that since I never mentioned HEIF anywhere, besides answering a question of another poster if it was turned on maybe, and the answer was no. HEIF has no influence on any problem I wrote of. Trolling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Boy, HEIF is why files of the same resolution and scene occupy less space, other users already explained that, you need to engage a few more brain cells before calling trolls.
No need to be hostile because you failed to prove yourself, move on with your life.
I read that the Open Beta updated the OOS Camera app
Some of you may know that the Camera app has an issue with an excessively strong noise filter that gives pictures a watercolor effect which destroys detail. Using GCam fixes that if you're rooted but I'd like to go back to stock for Android 10
So my question is have you noticed if the watercolor effect has been fixed? If possible, post sample photos! (comparing with GCam as well if you can!)
The effect is specially noticable in things with many tiny details like grass
revelbytes said:
I read that the Open Beta updated the OOS Camera app
Some of you may know that the Camera app has an issue with an excessively strong noise filter that gives pictures a watercolor effect which destroys detail. Using GCam fixes that if you're rooted but I'd like to go back to stock for Android 10
So my question is have you noticed if the watercolor effect has been fixed? If possible, post sample photos! (comparing with GCam as well if you can!)
The effect is specially noticable in things with many tiny details like grass
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if my standards are lower than yours, but here are some quick shots I took since the update to OB2.
The images are a little compressed so I can't tell with some of the finer details. However, the effect is so bad that it would be immediately noticeable and I don't see it in any of the pictures, so it must have been fixed.
Thank you very much!
revelbytes said:
The images are a little compressed so I can't tell with some of the finer details. However, the effect is so bad that it would be immediately noticeable and I don't see it in any of the pictures, so it must have been fixed.
Thank you very much!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. It looks pretty good to me, and I had a pixel XL in between my first OnePlus 5 that got drowned and the one I have now. The pixel was better but not by a huge amount imo.